<h2><SPAN name="chap36.3"></SPAN> Chapter XXXVI: Total Extinction Of The Western Empire.—Part III. </h2>
<p>Without the help of a personal interview, Genseric was sufficiently
acquainted with the genius and designs of his adversary. He practiced his
customary arts of fraud and delay, but he practiced them without success.
His applications for peace became each hour more submissive, and perhaps
more sincere; but the inflexible Majorian had adopted the ancient maxim,
that Rome could not be safe, as long as Carthage existed in a hostile
state. The king of the Vandals distrusted the valor of his native
subjects, who were enervated by the luxury of the South; <SPAN href="#linknote-36.51" name="linknoteref-36.51" id="linknoteref-36.51">51</SPAN>
he suspected the fidelity of the vanquished people, who abhorred him as an
Arian tyrant; and the desperate measure, which he executed, of reducing
Mauritania into a desert, <SPAN href="#linknote-36.52" name="linknoteref-36.52" id="linknoteref-36.52">52</SPAN> could not defeat the operations of the Roman
emperor, who was at liberty to land his troops on any part of the African
coast. But Genseric was saved from impending and inevitable ruin by the
treachery of some powerful subjects, envious, or apprehensive, of their
master’s success. Guided by their secret intelligence, he surprised the
unguarded fleet in the Bay of Carthagena: many of the ships were sunk, or
taken, or burnt; and the preparations of three years were destroyed in a
single day. <SPAN href="#linknote-36.53" name="linknoteref-36.53" id="linknoteref-36.53">53</SPAN> After this event, the behavior of the two
antagonists showed them superior to their fortune. The Vandal, instead of
being elated by this accidental victory, immediately renewed his
solicitations for peace. The emperor of the West, who was capable of
forming great designs, and of supporting heavy disappointments, consented
to a treaty, or rather to a suspension of arms; in the full assurance
that, before he could restore his navy, he should be supplied with
provocations to justify a second war. Majorian returned to Italy, to
prosecute his labors for the public happiness; and, as he was conscious of
his own integrity, he might long remain ignorant of the dark conspiracy
which threatened his throne and his life. The recent misfortune of
Carthagena sullied the glory which had dazzled the eyes of the multitude;
almost every description of civil and military officers were exasperated
against the Reformer, since they all derived some advantage from the
abuses which he endeavored to suppress; and the patrician Ricimer impelled
the inconstant passions of the Barbarians against a prince whom he
esteemed and hated. The virtues of Majorian could not protect him from the
impetuous sedition, which broke out in the camp near Tortona, at the foot
of the Alps. He was compelled to abdicate the Imperial purple: five days
after his abdication, it was reported that he died of a dysentery; <SPAN href="#linknote-36.54" name="linknoteref-36.54" id="linknoteref-36.54">54</SPAN>
and the humble tomb, which covered his remains, was consecrated by the
respect and gratitude of succeeding generations. <SPAN href="#linknote-36.55"
name="linknoteref-36.55" id="linknoteref-36.55">55</SPAN> The private character
of Majorian inspired love and respect. Malicious calumny and satire
excited his indignation, or, if he himself were the object, his contempt;
but he protected the freedom of wit, and, in the hours which the emperor
gave to the familiar society of his friends, he could indulge his taste
for pleasantry, without degrading the majesty of his rank. <SPAN href="#linknote-36.56" name="linknoteref-36.56" id="linknoteref-36.56">56</SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN name="linknote-36.51" id="linknote-36.51">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
51 (<SPAN href="#linknoteref-36.51">return</SPAN>)<br/> [</p>
<p>Spoliisque potitus<br/>
Immensis, robux luxu jam perdidit omne,<br/>
Quo valuit dum pauper erat.<br/>
—Panegyr. Majorian, 330.<br/></p>
<p class="foot">
He afterwards applies to Genseric, unjustly, as it should seem, the vices
of his subjects.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="linknote-36.52" id="linknote-36.52">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
52 (<SPAN href="#linknoteref-36.52">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ He burnt the villages,
and poisoned the springs, (Priscus, p. 42.) Dubos (Hist. Critique, tom. i.
p. 475) observes, that the magazines which the Moors buried in the earth
might escape his destructive search. Two or three hundred pits are
sometimes dug in the same place; and each pit contains at least four
hundred bushels of corn Shaw’s Travels, p. 139.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="linknote-36.53" id="linknote-36.53">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
53 (<SPAN href="#linknoteref-36.53">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Idatius, who was safe
in Gallicia from the power of Recimer boldly and honestly declares,
Vandali per proditeres admoniti, &c: i. e. dissembles, however, the
name of the traitor.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="linknote-36.54" id="linknote-36.54">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
54 (<SPAN href="#linknoteref-36.54">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Procop. de Bell.
Vandal. l. i. i. c. 8, p. 194. The testimony of Idatius is fair and
impartial: “Majorianum de Galliis Romam redeuntem, et Romano imperio vel
nomini res necessarias ordinantem; Richimer livore percitus, et invidorum
consilio fultus, fraude interficit circumventum.” Some read Suevorum, and
I am unwilling to efface either of the words, as they express the
different accomplices who united in the conspiracy against Majorian.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="linknote-36.55" id="linknote-36.55">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
55 (<SPAN href="#linknoteref-36.55">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ See the Epigrams of
Ennodius, No. cxxxv. inter Sirmond. Opera, tom. i. p. 1903. It is flat and
obscure; but Ennodius was made bishop of Pavia fifty years after the death
of Majorian, and his praise deserves credit and regard.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="linknote-36.56" id="linknote-36.56">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
56 (<SPAN href="#linknoteref-36.56">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Sidonius gives a
tedious account (l. i. epist. xi. p. 25-31) of a supper at Arles, to which
he was invited by Majorian, a short time before his death. He had no
intention of praising a deceased emperor: but a casual disinterested
remark, “Subrisit Augustus; ut erat, auctoritate servata, cum se
communioni dedisset, joci plenus,” outweighs the six hundred lines of his
venal panegyric.]</p>
<p>It was not, perhaps, without some regret, that Ricimer sacrificed his
friend to the interest of his ambition: but he resolved, in a second
choice, to avoid the imprudent preference of superior virtue and merit. At
his command, the obsequious senate of Rome bestowed the Imperial title on
Libius Severus, who ascended the throne of the West without emerging from
the obscurity of a private condition. History has scarcely deigned to
notice his birth, his elevation, his character, or his death. Severus
expired, as soon as his life became inconvenient to his patron; <SPAN href="#linknote-36.57" name="linknoteref-36.57" id="linknoteref-36.57">57</SPAN>
and it would be useless to discriminate his nominal reign in the vacant
interval of six years, between the death of Majorian and the elevation of
Anthemius. During that period, the government was in the hands of Ricimer
alone; and, although the modest Barbarian disclaimed the name of king, he
accumulated treasures, formed a separate army, negotiated private
alliances, and ruled Italy with the same independent and despotic
authority, which was afterwards exercised by Odoacer and Theodoric. But
his dominions were bounded by the Alps; and two Roman generals,
Marcellinus and Aegidius, maintained their allegiance to the republic, by
rejecting, with disdain, the phantom which he styled an emperor.
Marcellinus still adhered to the old religion; and the devout Pagans, who
secretly disobeyed the laws of the church and state, applauded his
profound skill in the science of divination. But he possessed the more
valuable qualifications of learning, virtue, and courage; <SPAN href="#linknote-36.58" name="linknoteref-36.58" id="linknoteref-36.58">58</SPAN>
the study of the Latin literature had improved his taste; and his military
talents had recommended him to the esteem and confidence of the great
Ætius, in whose ruin he was involved. By a timely flight, Marcellinus
escaped the rage of Valentinian, and boldly asserted his liberty amidst
the convulsions of the Western empire. His voluntary, or reluctant,
submission to the authority of Majorian, was rewarded by the government of
Sicily, and the command of an army, stationed in that island to oppose, or
to attack, the Vandals; but his Barbarian mercenaries, after the emperor’s
death, were tempted to revolt by the artful liberality of Ricimer. At the
head of a band of faithful followers, the intrepid Marcellinus occupied
the province of Dalmatia, assumed the title of patrician of the West,
secured the love of his subjects by a mild and equitable reign, built a
fleet which claimed the dominion of the Adriatic, and alternately alarmed
the coasts of Italy and of Africa. <SPAN href="#linknote-36.59"
name="linknoteref-36.59" id="linknoteref-36.59">59</SPAN> Aegidius, the
master-general of Gaul, who equalled, or at least who imitated, the heroes
of ancient Rome, <SPAN href="#linknote-36.60" name="linknoteref-36.60" id="linknoteref-36.60">60</SPAN> proclaimed his immortal resentment against
the assassins of his beloved master. A brave and numerous army was
attached to his standard: and, though he was prevented by the arts of
Ricimer, and the arms of the Visigoths, from marching to the gates of
Rome, he maintained his independent sovereignty beyond the Alps, and
rendered the name of Aegidius, respectable both in peace and war. The
Franks, who had punished with exile the youthful follies of Childeric,
elected the Roman general for their king: his vanity, rather than his
ambition, was gratified by that singular honor; and when the nation, at
the end of four years, repented of the injury which they had offered to
the Merovingian family, he patiently acquiesced in the restoration of the
lawful prince. The authority of Aegidius ended only with his life, and the
suspicions of poison and secret violence, which derived some countenance
from the character of Ricimer, were eagerly entertained by the passionate
credulity of the Gauls. <SPAN href="#linknote-36.61" name="linknoteref-36.61" id="linknoteref-36.61">61</SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN name="linknote-36.57" id="linknote-36.57">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
57 (<SPAN href="#linknoteref-36.57">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Sidonius (Panegyr.
Anthem. 317) dismisses him to heaven:—Auxerat Augustus naturae lege
Severus—Divorum numerum. And an old list of the emperors, composed
about the time of Justinian, praises his piety, and fixes his residence at
Rome, (Sirmond. Not. ad Sidon. p. 111, 112.)]</p>
<p><SPAN name="linknote-36.58" id="linknote-36.58">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
58 (<SPAN href="#linknoteref-36.58">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Tillemont, who is
always scandalized by the virtues of infidels, attributes this
advantageous portrait of Marcellinus (which Suidas has preserved) to the
partial zeal of some Pagan historian, (Hist. des Empereurs. tom. vi. p.
330.)]</p>
<p><SPAN name="linknote-36.59" id="linknote-36.59">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
59 (<SPAN href="#linknoteref-36.59">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Procopius de Bell.
Vandal. l. i. c. 6, p. 191. In various circumstances of the life of
Marcellinus, it is not easy to reconcile the Greek historian with the
Latin Chronicles of the times.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="linknote-36.60" id="linknote-36.60">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
60 (<SPAN href="#linknoteref-36.60">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ I must apply to
Aegidius the praises which Sidonius (Panegyr Majorian, 553) bestows on a
nameless master-general, who commanded the rear-guard of Majorian.
Idatius, from public report, commends his Christian piety; and Priscus
mentions (p. 42) his military virtues.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="linknote-36.61" id="linknote-36.61">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
61 (<SPAN href="#linknoteref-36.61">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Greg. Turon. l. ii. c.
12, in tom. ii. p. 168. The Pere Daniel, whose ideas were superficial and
modern, has started some objections against the story of Childeric, (Hist.
de France, tom. i. Preface Historique, p. lxxvii., &c.:) but they have
been fairly satisfied by Dubos, (Hist. Critique, tom. i. p. 460-510,) and
by two authors who disputed the prize of the Academy of Soissons, (p.
131-177, 310-339.) With regard to the term of Childeric’s exile, it is
necessary either to prolong the life of Aegidius beyond the date assigned
by the Chronicle of Idatius or to correct the text of Gregory, by reading
quarto anno, instead of octavo.]</p>
<p>The kingdom of Italy, a name to which the Western empire was gradually
reduced, was afflicted, under the reign of Ricimer, by the incessant
depredations of the Vandal pirates. <SPAN href="#linknote-36.62"
name="linknoteref-36.62" id="linknoteref-36.62">62</SPAN> In the spring of each
year, they equipped a formidable navy in the port of Carthage; and
Genseric himself, though in a very advanced age, still commanded in person
the most important expeditions. His designs were concealed with
impenetrable secrecy, till the moment that he hoisted sail. When he was
asked, by his pilot, what course he should steer, “Leave the determination
to the winds, (replied the Barbarian, with pious arrogance;) they will
transport us to the guilty coast, whose inhabitants have provoked the
divine justice;” but if Genseric himself deigned to issue more precise
orders, he judged the most wealthy to be the most criminal. The Vandals
repeatedly visited the coasts of Spain, Liguria, Tuscany, Campania,
Lucania, Bruttium, Apulia, Calabria, Venetia, Dalmatia, Epirus, Greece,
and Sicily: they were tempted to subdue the Island of Sardinia, so
advantageously placed in the centre of the Mediterranean; and their arms
spread desolation, or terror, from the columns of Hercules to the mouth of
the Nile. As they were more ambitious of spoil than of glory, they seldom
attacked any fortified cities, or engaged any regular troops in the open
field. But the celerity of their motions enabled them, almost at the same
time, to threaten and to attack the most distant objects, which attracted
their desires; and as they always embarked a sufficient number of horses,
they had no sooner landed, than they swept the dismayed country with a
body of light cavalry. Yet, notwithstanding the example of their king, the
native Vandals and Alani insensibly declined this toilsome and perilous
warfare; the hardy generation of the first conquerors was almost
extinguished, and their sons, who were born in Africa, enjoyed the
delicious baths and gardens which had been acquired by the valor of their
fathers. Their place was readily supplied by a various multitude of Moors
and Romans, of captives and outlaws; and those desperate wretches, who had
already violated the laws of their country, were the most eager to promote
the atrocious acts which disgrace the victories of Genseric. In the
treatment of his unhappy prisoners, he sometimes consulted his avarice,
and sometimes indulged his cruelty; and the massacre of five hundred noble
citizens of Zant or Zacynthus, whose mangled bodies he cast into the
Ionian Sea, was imputed, by the public indignation, to his latest
posterity.</p>
<p><SPAN name="linknote-36.62" id="linknote-36.62">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
62 (<SPAN href="#linknoteref-36.62">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ The naval war of
Genseric is described by Priscus, (Excerpta Legation. p. 42,) Procopius,
(de Bell. Vandal. l. i. c. 5, p. 189, 190, and c. 22, p. 228,) Victor
Vitensis, (de Persecut. Vandal. l. i. c. 17, and Ruinart, p. 467-481,) and
in three panegyrics of Sidonius, whose chronological order is absurdly
transposed in the editions both of Savaron and Sirmond. (Avit. Carm. vii.
441-451. Majorian. Carm. v. 327-350, 385-440. Anthem. Carm. ii. 348-386)
In one passage the poet seems inspired by his subject, and expresses a
strong idea by a lively image:—</p>
<p>Hinc Vandalus hostis<br/>
Urget; et in nostrum numerosa classe quotannis<br/>
Militat excidium; conversoque ordine Fati<br/>
Torrida Caucaseos infert mihi Byrsa furores]<br/></p>
<p>Such crimes could not be excused by any provocations; but the war, which
the king of the Vandals prosecuted against the Roman empire was justified
by a specious and reasonable motive. The widow of Valentinian, Eudoxia,
whom he had led captive from Rome to Carthage, was the sole heiress of
the Theodosian house; her elder daughter, Eudocia, became the reluctant
wife of Hunneric, his eldest son; and the stern father, asserting a legal
claim, which could not easily be refuted or satisfied, demanded a just
proportion of the Imperial patrimony. An adequate, or at least a
valuable, compensation, was offered by the Eastern emperor, to purchase a
necessary peace. Eudoxia and her younger daughter, Placidia, were
honorably restored, and the fury of the Vandals was confined to the
limits of the Western empire. The Italians, destitute of a naval force,
which alone was capable of protecting their coasts, implored the aid of
the more fortunate nations of the East; who had formerly acknowledged, in
peace and war, the supremacy of Rome. But the perpetual divisions of the
two empires had alienated their interest and their inclinations; the
faith of a recent treaty was alleged; and the Western Romans, instead of
arms and ships, could only obtain the assistance of a cold and
ineffectual mediation. The haughty Ricimer, who had long struggled with
the difficulties of his situation, was at length reduced to address the
throne of Constantinople, in the humble language of a subject; and Italy
submitted, as the price and security of the alliance, to accept a master
from the choice of the emperor of the East. <SPAN href="#linknote-36.63" name="linknoteref-36.63" id="linknoteref-36.63">63</SPAN>
It is not the purpose of the present chapter, or even of the present
volume, to continue the distinct series of the Byzantine history; but a
concise view of the reign and character of the emperor Leo, may explain
the last efforts that were attempted to save the falling empire of the
West. <SPAN href="#linknote-36.64" name="linknoteref-36.64" id="linknoteref-36.64">64</SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN name="linknote-36.63" id="linknote-36.63">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
63 (<SPAN href="#linknoteref-36.63">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ The poet himself is
compelled to acknowledge the distress of Ricimer:—</p>
<p>Præterea invictus Ricimer, quem publica fata<br/>
Respiciunt, proprio solas vix Marte repellit<br/>
Piratam per rura vagum.<br/></p>
<p class="foot">
Italy addresses her complaint to the Tyber, and Rome, at the solicitation
of the river god, transports herself to Constantinople, renounces her
ancient claims, and implores the friendship of Aurora, the goddess of the
East. This fabulous machinery, which the genius of Claudian had used and
abused, is the constant and miserable resource of the muse of Sidonius.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="linknote-36.64" id="linknote-36.64">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
64 (<SPAN href="#linknoteref-36.64">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ The original authors of
the reigns of Marcian, Leo, and Zeno, are reduced to some imperfect
fragments, whose deficiencies must be supplied from the more recent
compilations of Theophanes, Zonaras, and Cedrenus.]</p>
<p>Since the death of the younger Theodosius, the domestic repose of
Constantinople had never been interrupted by war or faction. Pulcheria had
bestowed her hand, and the sceptre of the East, on the modest virtue of
Marcian: he gratefully reverenced her august rank and virgin chastity;
and, after her death, he gave his people the example of the religious
worship that was due to the memory of the Imperial saint. <SPAN href="#linknote-36.65" name="linknoteref-36.65" id="linknoteref-36.65">65</SPAN>
Attentive to the prosperity of his own dominions, Marcian seemed to
behold, with indifference, the misfortunes of Rome; and the obstinate
refusal of a brave and active prince, to draw his sword against the
Vandals, was ascribed to a secret promise, which had formerly been exacted
from him when he was a captive in the power of Genseric. <SPAN href="#linknote-36.66" name="linknoteref-36.66" id="linknoteref-36.66">66</SPAN>
The death of Marcian, after a reign of seven years, would have exposed the
East to the danger of a popular election; if the superior weight of a
single family had not been able to incline the balance in favor of the
candidate whose interest they supported. The patrician Aspar might have
placed the diadem on his own head, if he would have subscribed the Nicene
creed. <SPAN href="#linknote-36.67" name="linknoteref-36.67" id="linknoteref-36.67">67</SPAN> During three generations, the armies of the
East were successively commanded by his father, by himself, and by his son
Ardaburius; his Barbarian guards formed a military force that overawed the
palace and the capital; and the liberal distribution of his immense
treasures rendered Aspar as popular as he was powerful. He recommended the
obscure name of Leo of Thrace, a military tribune, and the principal
steward of his household. His nomination was unanimously ratified by the
senate; and the servant of Aspar received the Imperial crown from the
hands of the patriarch or bishop, who was permitted to express, by this
unusual ceremony, the suffrage of the Deity. <SPAN href="#linknote-36.68"
name="linknoteref-36.68" id="linknoteref-36.68">68</SPAN> This emperor, the
first of the name of Leo, has been distinguished by the title of the
Great; from a succession of princes, who gradually fixed in the opinion of
the Greeks a very humble standard of heroic, or at least of royal,
perfection. Yet the temperate firmness with which Leo resisted the
oppression of his benefactor, showed that he was conscious of his duty and
of his prerogative. Aspar was astonished to find that his influence could
no longer appoint a praefect of Constantinople: he presumed to reproach
his sovereign with a breach of promise, and insolently shaking his purple,
“It is not proper, (said he,) that the man who is invested with this
garment, should be guilty of lying.” “Nor is it proper, (replied Leo,)
that a prince should be compelled to resign his own judgment, and the
public interest, to the will of a subject.”<SPAN href="#linknote-36.69"
name="linknoteref-36.69" id="linknoteref-36.69">69</SPAN> After this
extraordinary scene, it was impossible that the reconciliation of the
emperor and the patrician could be sincere; or, at least, that it could be
solid and permanent. An army of Isaurians <SPAN href="#linknote-36.70"
name="linknoteref-36.70" id="linknoteref-36.70">70</SPAN> was secretly levied,
and introduced into Constantinople; and while Leo undermined the
authority, and prepared the disgrace, of the family of Aspar, his mild and
cautious behavior restrained them from any rash and desperate attempts,
which might have been fatal to themselves, or their enemies. The measures
of peace and war were affected by this internal revolution. As long as
Aspar degraded the majesty of the throne, the secret correspondence of
religion and interest engaged him to favor the cause of Genseric. When Leo
had delivered himself from that ignominious servitude, he listened to the
complaints of the Italians; resolved to extirpate the tyranny of the
Vandals; and declared his alliance with his colleague, Anthemius, whom he
solemnly invested with the diadem and purple of the West.</p>
<p><SPAN name="linknote-36.65" id="linknote-36.65">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
65 (<SPAN href="#linknoteref-36.65">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ St. Pulcheria died A.D.
453, four years before her nominal husband; and her festival is celebrated
on the 10th of September by the modern Greeks: she bequeathed an immense
patrimony to pious, or, at least, to ecclesiastical, uses. See Tillemont,
Mémoires Eccles. tom. xv p. 181-184.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="linknote-36.66" id="linknote-36.66">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
66 (<SPAN href="#linknoteref-36.66">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ See Procopius, de Bell.
Vandal. l. i. c. 4, p. 185.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="linknote-36.67" id="linknote-36.67">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
67 (<SPAN href="#linknoteref-36.67">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ From this disability of
Aspar to ascend the throne, it may be inferred that the stain of Heresy
was perpetual and indelible, while that of Barbarism disappeared in the
second generation.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="linknote-36.68" id="linknote-36.68">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
68 (<SPAN href="#linknoteref-36.68">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Theophanes, p. 95. This
appears to be the first origin of a ceremony, which all the Christian
princes of the world have since adopted and from which the clergy have
deduced the most formidable consequences.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="linknote-36.69" id="linknote-36.69">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
69 (<SPAN href="#linknoteref-36.69">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Cedrenus, (p. 345,
346,) who was conversant with the writers of better days, has preserved
the remarkable words of Aspar.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="linknote-36.70" id="linknote-36.70">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
70 (<SPAN href="#linknoteref-36.70">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ The power of the
Isaurians agitated the Eastern empire in the two succeeding reigns of Zeno
and Anastasius; but it ended in the destruction of those Barbarians, who
maintained their fierce independences about two hundred and thirty years.]</p>
<p>The virtues of Anthemius have perhaps been magnified, since the Imperial
descent, which he could only deduce from the usurper Procopius, has been
swelled into a line of emperors. <SPAN href="#linknote-36.71"
name="linknoteref-36.71" id="linknoteref-36.71">71</SPAN> But the merit of his
immediate parents, their honors, and their riches, rendered Anthemius one
of the most illustrious subjects of the East. His father, Procopius,
obtained, after his Persian embassy, the rank of general and patrician;
and the name of Anthemius was derived from his maternal grandfather, the
celebrated praefect, who protected, with so much ability and success, the
infant reign of Theodosius. The grandson of the praefect was raised above
the condition of a private subject, by his marriage with Euphemia, the
daughter of the emperor Marcian. This splendid alliance, which might
supersede the necessity of merit, hastened the promotion of Anthemius to
the successive dignities of count, of master-general, of consul, and of
patrician; and his merit or fortune claimed the honors of a victory, which
was obtained on the banks of the Danube, over the Huns. Without indulging
an extravagant ambition, the son-in-law of Marcian might hope to be his
successor; but Anthemius supported the disappointment with courage and
patience; and his subsequent elevation was universally approved by the
public, who esteemed him worthy to reign, till he ascended the throne. <SPAN href="#linknote-36.72" name="linknoteref-36.72" id="linknoteref-36.72">72</SPAN>
The emperor of the West marched from Constantinople, attended by several
counts of high distinction, and a body of guards almost equal to the
strength and numbers of a regular army: he entered Rome in triumph, and
the choice of Leo was confirmed by the senate, the people, and the
Barbarian confederates of Italy. <SPAN href="#linknote-36.73"
name="linknoteref-36.73" id="linknoteref-36.73">73</SPAN> The solemn
inauguration of Anthemius was followed by the nuptials of his daughter and
the patrician Ricimer; a fortunate event, which was considered as the
firmest security of the union and happiness of the state. The wealth of
two empires was ostentatiously displayed; and many senators completed
their ruin, by an expensive effort to disguise their poverty. All serious
business was suspended during this festival; the courts of justice were
shut; the streets of Rome, the theatres, the places of public and private
resort, resounded with hymeneal songs and dances: and the royal bride,
clothed in silken robes, with a crown on her head, was conducted to the
palace of Ricimer, who had changed his military dress for the habit of a
consul and a senator. On this memorable occasion, Sidonius, whose early
ambition had been so fatally blasted, appeared as the orator of Auvergne,
among the provincial deputies who addressed the throne with
congratulations or complaints. <SPAN href="#linknote-36.74"
name="linknoteref-36.74" id="linknoteref-36.74">74</SPAN> The calends of
January were now approaching, and the venal poet, who had loved Avitus,
and esteemed Majorian, was persuaded by his friends to celebrate, in
heroic verse, the merit, the felicity, the second consulship, and the
future triumphs, of the emperor Anthemius. Sidonius pronounced, with
assurance and success, a panegyric which is still extant; and whatever
might be the imperfections, either of the subject or of the composition,
the welcome flatterer was immediately rewarded with the praefecture of
Rome; a dignity which placed him among the illustrious personages of the
empire, till he wisely preferred the more respectable character of a
bishop and a saint. <SPAN href="#linknote-36.75" name="linknoteref-36.75" id="linknoteref-36.75">75</SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN name="linknote-36.71" id="linknote-36.71">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
71 (<SPAN href="#linknoteref-36.71">return</SPAN>)<br/> [</p>
<p>Tali tu civis ab urbe<br/>
Procopio genitore micas; cui prisca propago<br/>
Augustis venit a proavis.<br/></p>
<p class="foot">
The poet (Sidon. Panegyr. Anthem. 67-306) then proceeds to relate the
private life and fortunes of the future emperor, with which he must have
been imperfectly acquainted.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="linknote-36.72" id="linknote-36.72">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
72 (<SPAN href="#linknoteref-36.72">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Sidonius discovers,
with tolerable ingenuity, that this disappointment added new lustre to the
virtues of Anthemius, (210, &c.,) who declined one sceptre, and
reluctantly accepted another, (22, &c.)]</p>
<p><SPAN name="linknote-36.73" id="linknote-36.73">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
73 (<SPAN href="#linknoteref-36.73">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ The poet again
celebrates the unanimity of all orders of the state, (15-22;) and the
Chronicle of Idatius mentions the forces which attended his march.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="linknote-36.74" id="linknote-36.74">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
74 (<SPAN href="#linknoteref-36.74">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Interveni autem nuptiis
Patricii Ricimeris, cui filia perennis Augusti in spem publicae
securitatis copulabator. The journey of Sidonius from Lyons, and the
festival of Rome, are described with some spirit. L. i. epist. 5, p. 9-13,
epist. 9, p. 21.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="linknote-36.75" id="linknote-36.75">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
75 (<SPAN href="#linknoteref-36.75">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Sidonius (l. i. epist.
9, p. 23, 24) very fairly states his motive, his labor, and his reward.
“Hic ipse Panegyricus, si non judicium, certa eventum, boni operis,
accepit.” He was made bishop of Clermont, A.D. 471. Tillemont, Mem.
Eccles. tom. xvi. p. 750.]</p>
<p>The Greeks ambitiously commend the piety and catholic faith of the emperor
whom they gave to the West; nor do they forget to observe, that when he
left Constantinople, he converted his palace into the pious foundation of
a public bath, a church, and a hospital for old men. <SPAN href="#linknote-36.76" name="linknoteref-36.76" id="linknoteref-36.76">76</SPAN>
Yet some suspicious appearances are found to sully the theological fame of
Anthemius. From the conversation of Philotheus, a Macedonian sectary, he
had imbibed the spirit of religious toleration; and the Heretics of Rome
would have assembled with impunity, if the bold and vehement censure which
Pope Hilary pronounced in the church of St. Peter, had not obliged him to
abjure the unpopular indulgence. <SPAN href="#linknote-36.77"
name="linknoteref-36.77" id="linknoteref-36.77">77</SPAN> Even the Pagans, a
feeble and obscure remnant, conceived some vain hopes, from the
indifference, or partiality, of Anthemius; and his singular friendship for
the philosopher Severus, whom he promoted to the consulship, was ascribed
to a secret project, of reviving the ancient worship of the gods. <SPAN href="#linknote-36.78" name="linknoteref-36.78" id="linknoteref-36.78">78</SPAN>
These idols were crumbled into dust: and the mythology which had once been
the creed of nations, was so universally disbelieved, that it might be
employed without scandal, or at least without suspicion, by Christian
poets. <SPAN href="#linknote-36.79" name="linknoteref-36.79" id="linknoteref-36.79">79</SPAN> Yet the vestiges of superstition were not
absolutely obliterated, and the festival of the Lupercalia, whose origin
had preceded the foundation of Rome, was still celebrated under the reign
of Anthemius. The savage and simple rites were expressive of an early
state of society before the invention of arts and agriculture. The rustic
deities who presided over the toils and pleasures of the pastoral life,
Pan, Faunus, and their train of satyrs, were such as the fancy of
shepherds might create, sportive, petulant, and lascivious; whose power
was limited, and whose malice was inoffensive. A goat was the offering the
best adapted to their character and attributes; the flesh of the victim
was roasted on willow spits; and the riotous youths, who crowded to the
feast, ran naked about the fields, with leather thongs in their hands,
communicating, as it was supposed, the blessing of fecundity to the women
whom they touched. <SPAN href="#linknote-36.80" name="linknoteref-36.80" id="linknoteref-36.80">80</SPAN> The altar of Pan was erected, perhaps by
Evander the Arcadian, in a dark recess in the side of the Palantine hill,
watered by a perpetual fountain, and shaded by a hanging grove. A
tradition, that, in the same place, Romulus and Remus were suckled by the
wolf, rendered it still more sacred and venerable in the eyes of the
Romans; and this sylvan spot was gradually surrounded by the stately
edifices of the Forum. <SPAN href="#linknote-36.81" name="linknoteref-36.81" id="linknoteref-36.81">81</SPAN> After the conversion of the Imperial city,
the Christians still continued, in the month of February, the annual
celebration of the Lupercalia; to which they ascribed a secret and
mysterious influence on the genial powers of the animal and vegetable
world.</p>
<p>The bishops of Rome were solicitous to abolish a profane custom, so
repugnant to the spirit of Christianity; but their zeal was not supported
by the authority of the civil magistrate: the inveterate abuse subsisted
till the end of the fifth century, and Pope Gelasius, who purified the
capital from the last stain of idolatry, appeased by a formal apology, the
murmurs of the senate and people. <SPAN href="#linknote-36.82"
name="linknoteref-36.82" id="linknoteref-36.82">82</SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN name="linknote-36.76" id="linknote-36.76">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
76 (<SPAN href="#linknoteref-36.76">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ The palace of Anthemius
stood on the banks of the Propontis. In the ninth century, Alexius, the
son-in-law of the emperor Theophilus, obtained permission to purchase the
ground; and ended his days in a monastery which he founded on that
delightful spot. Ducange Constantinopolis Christiana, p. 117, 152.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="linknote-36.77" id="linknote-36.77">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
77 (<SPAN href="#linknoteref-36.77">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Papa Hilarius... apud
beatum Petrum Apostolum, palam ne id fieret, clara voce constrinxit, in
tantum ut non ea facienda cum interpositione juramenti idem promitteret
Imperator. Gelasius Epistol ad Andronicum, apud Baron. A.D. 467, No. 3.
The cardinal observes, with some complacency, that it was much easier to
plant heresies at Constantinople, than at Rome.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="linknote-36.78" id="linknote-36.78">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
78 (<SPAN href="#linknoteref-36.78">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Damascius, in the life
of the philosopher Isidore, apud Photium, p. 1049. Damascius, who lived
under Justinian, composed another work, consisting of 570 praeternatural
stories of souls, daemons, apparitions, the dotage of Platonic Paganism.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="linknote-36.79" id="linknote-36.79">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
79 (<SPAN href="#linknoteref-36.79">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ In the poetical works
of Sidonius, which he afterwards condemned, (l. ix. epist. 16, p. 285,)
the fabulous deities are the principal actors. If Jerom was scourged by
the angels for only reading Virgil, the bishop of Clermont, for such a
vile imitation, deserved an additional whipping from the Muses.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="linknote-36.80" id="linknote-36.80">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
80 (<SPAN href="#linknoteref-36.80">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Ovid (Fast. l. ii.
267-452) has given an amusing description of the follies of antiquity,
which still inspired so much respect, that a grave magistrate, running
naked through the streets, was not an object of astonishment or laughter.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="linknote-36.81" id="linknote-36.81">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
81 (<SPAN href="#linknoteref-36.81">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ See Dionys. Halicarn.
l. i. p. 25, 65, edit. Hudson. The Roman antiquaries Donatus (l. ii. c.
18, p. 173, 174) and Nardini (p. 386, 387) have labored to ascertain the
true situation of the Lupercal.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="linknote-36.82" id="linknote-36.82">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
82 (<SPAN href="#linknoteref-36.82">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Baronius published,
from the MSS. of the Vatican, this epistle of Pope Gelasius, (A.D. 496,
No. 28-45,) which is entitled Adversus Andromachum Senatorem, caeterosque
Romanos, qui Lupercalia secundum morem pristinum colenda constituebant.
Gelasius always supposes that his adversaries are nominal Christians, and,
that he may not yield to them in absurd prejudice, he imputes to this
harmless festival all the calamities of the age.]</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />