<SPAN name="ch16"><!--Marker--></SPAN>
<h2> CHAPTER XVI </h2>
<h3> OLD WILTSHIRE DAYS </h3>
<blockquote>
Old memories—Hindon as a borough and as a
village—The Lamb Inn and its birds—The "mob" at
Hindon—The blind smuggler—Rawlings of Lower
Pertwood Farm—Reed, the thresher and
deer-stealer—He leaves a fortune—Devotion to
work—Old Father Time—Groveley Wood and the
people's rights—Grace Reed and the Earl of
Pembroke—An illusion of the very
aged—Sedan-chairs in Bath—Stick-gathering by the
poor—Game-preserving
</blockquote>
<p>The incident of the unhappy young man who was transported to
Australia or Tasmania, which came out in the shepherd's
history of the Ellerby family, put it in my mind to look up
some of the very aged people of the downland villages, whose
memories could go back to the events of eighty years ago. I
found a few, "still lingering here," who were able to recall
that miserable and memorable year of 1830 and had witnessed
the doings of the "mobs." One was a woman, my old friend of
Fonthill Bishop, now aged ninety-four, who was in her teens
when the poor labourers, "a thousand strong," some say, armed
with cudgels, hammers, and axes, visited her village and
broke up the thrashing machines they found there.</p>
<p>Another person who remembered that time was an old but
remarkably well-preserved man of eighty-nine at Hindon, a
village a couple of miles distant from Fonthill Bishop.
Hindon is a delightful little village, so rustic and pretty
amidst its green, swelling downs, with great woods crowning
the heights beyond, that one can hardly credit the fact that
it was formerly an important market and session town and a
Parliamentary borough returning two members; also that it
boasted among other greatnesses thirteen public-houses. Now
it has two, and not flourishing in these tea- and
mineral-water drinking days. Naturally it was an exceeedingly
corrupt little borough, where free beer for all was the order
of the day for a period of four to six weeks before an
election, and where every householder with a vote looked to
receive twenty guineas from the candidate of his choice. It
is still remembered that when a householder in those days was
very hard up, owing, perhaps, to his too frequent visits to
the thirteen public-houses, he would go to some substantial
tradesman in the place and pledge his twenty guineas, due at
the next election! In due time, after the Reform Bill, it was
deprived of its glory, and later when the South-Western
Railway built their line from Salisbury to Yeovil and left
Hindon some miles away, making their station at Tisbury, it
fell into decay, dwindling to the small village it now is;
and its last state, sober and purified, is very much better
than the old. For although sober, it is contented and even
merry, and exhibits such a sweet friendliness toward the
stranger within its gates as to make him remember it with
pleasure and gratitude.</p>
<p>What a quiet little place Hindon has become, after its old
noisy period, the following little bird story will show. For
several weeks during the spring and summer of 1909 my home
was at the Lamb Inn, a famous posting-house of the great old
days, and we had three pairs of birds—throstle, pied
wagtail, and flycatcher—breeding in the ivy covering
the wall facing the village street, just over my window. I
watched them when building, incubating, feeding their young,
and bringing their young off. The villagers, too, were
interested in the sight, and sometimes a dozen or more men
and boys would gather and stand for half an hour watching the
birds flying in and out of their nests when feeding their
young. The last to come off were the flycatchers, on 18th
June. It was on the morning of the day I left, and one of the
little things flitted into the room where I was having my
breakfast. I succeeded in capturing it before the cats found
out, and put it back on the ivy. There were three young
birds; I had watched them from the time they hatched, and
when I returned a fortnight later, there were the three,
still being fed by their parents in the trees and on the
roof, their favourite perching-place being on the swinging
sign of the "Lamb." Whenever an old bird darted at and
captured a fly the three young would flutter round it like
three butterflies to get the fly. This continued until 18th
July, after which date I could not detect their feeding the
young, although the hunger-call was occasionally heard.</p>
<p>If the flycatcher takes a month to teach its young to catch
their own flies, it is not strange that it breeds but once in
the year. It is a delicate art the bird practises and takes
long to learn, but how different with the martin, which
dismisses its young in a few days and begins breeding again,
even to the third time!</p>
<p>These three broods over my window were not the only ones in
the place; there were at least twenty other pairs in the
garden and outhouses of the inn—sparrows, thrushes,
blackbirds, dunnocks, wrens, starlings, and swallows. Yet the
inn was in the very centre of the village, and being an inn
was the most frequented and noisiest spot.</p>
<p>To return to my old friend of eighty-nine. He was but a small
boy, attending the Hindon school, when the rioters appeared
on the scene, and he watched their entry from the schoolhouse
window. It was market-day, and the market was stopped by the
invaders, and the agricultural machines brought for sale and
exhibition were broken up. The picture that remains in his
mind is of a great excited crowd in which men and cattle and
sheep were mixed together in the wide street, which was the
market-place, and of shouting and noise of smashing
machinery, and finally of the mob pouring forth over the down
on its way to the next village, he and other little boys
following their march.</p>
<p>The smuggling trade flourished greatly at that period, and
there were receivers and distributors of smuggled wine,
spirits, and other commodities in every town and in very many
villages throughout the county in spite of its distance from
the sea-coast. One of his memories is of a blind man of the
village, or town as it was then, who was used as an assistant
in this business. He had lost his sight in childhood, one eye
having been destroyed by a ferret which got into his cradle;
then, when he was about six years old he was running across
the room one day with a fork it his hand when he stumbled,
and falling on the floor had the other eye pierced by the
prongs. But in spite of his blindness he became a good
worker, and could make a fence, reap, trim hedges, feed the
animals, and drive a horse as well as any man. His father had
a small farm and was a carrier as well, a quiet, sober,
industrious man who was never suspected by his neighbours of
being a smuggler, for he never left his house and work, but
from time to time he had little consignments of rum and
brandy in casks received on a dark night and carefully stowed
away in his manure heap and in a pit under the floor of his
pigsty. Then the blind son would drive his old mother in the
carrier's cart to Bath and call at a dozen or twenty private
houses, leaving parcels which had been already ordered and
paid for—a gallon of brandy at one, two or four gallons
of rum at another, and so on, until all was got rid of, and
on the following day they would return with goods to Hindon.
This quiet little business went on satisfactorily for some
years, during which the officers of the excise had stared a
thousand times with their eagle's eyes at the quaint old
woman in her poke bonnet and shawl, driven by a blind man
with a vacant face, and had suspected nothing, when a little
mistake was made and a jar of brandy delivered at a wrong
address. The recipient was an honest gentleman, and in his
anxiety to find the rightful owner of the brandy made
extensive inquiries in his neighbourhood, and eventually the
excisemen got wind of the affair, and on the very next visit
of the old woman and her son to Bath they were captured.
After an examination before a magistrate the son was
discharged on account of his blindness, but the cart and
horses, as well as the smuggled spirits, were confiscated,
and the poor blind man had to make his way on foot to Hindon.</p>
<p>Another of his recollections is of a family named Rawlings,
tenants of Lower Pertwood Farm, near Hindon, a lonely,
desolate-looking house hidden away in a deep hollow among the
high downs. The Farmer Rawlings of seventy or eighty years
ago was a man of singular ideas, and that he was permitted to
put them in practice shows that severe as was the law in
those days, and dreadful the punishments inflicted on
offenders, there was a kind of liberty which does not exist
now—the liberty a man had of doing just what he thought
proper in his own house. This Rawlings had a numerous family,
and some died at home and others lived to grow up and go out
into the world under strange names—Faith, Hope, and
Charity were three of his daughters, and Justice, Morality,
and Fortitude three of his sons. Now, for some reason
Rawlings objected to the burial of his dead in the churchyard
of the nearest village—Monkton Deverill, and the story
is that he quarrelled with the rector over the question of
the church bell being tolled for the funeral. He would have
no bell tolled, he swore, and the rector would bury no one
without the bell. Thereupon Rawlings had the coffined corpse
deposited on a table in an outhouse and the door made fast.
Later there was another death, then a third, and all three
were kept in the same place for several years, and although
it was known to the whole countryside no action was taken by
the local authorities.</p>
<p>My old informant says that he was often at the farm when he
was a young man, and he used to steal round to the "Dead
House," as it was called, to peep through a crack in the door
and see the three coffins resting on the table in the dim
interior.</p>
<p>Eventually the dead disappeared a little while before the
Rawlings gave up the farm, and it was supposed that the old
farmer had buried them in the night-time in one of the
neighbouring chalk-pits, but the spot has never been
discovered.</p>
<p>One of the stories of the old Wiltshire days I picked up was
from an old woman, aged eighty-seven, in the Wilton
workhouse. She has a vivid recollection of a labourer named
Reed, in Odstock, a village on the Ebble near Salisbury, a
stern, silent man, who was a marvel of strength and
endurance. The work in which he most delighted was precisely
that which most labourers hated, before threshing machines
came in despite the action of the "mobs"—threshing out
corn with the flail. From earliest dawn till after dark he
would sit or stand in a dim, dusty barn, monotonously
pounding away, without an interval to rest, and without
dinner, and with no food but a piece of bread and a pinch of
salt. Without the salt he would not eat the bread. An hour
after all others had ceased from work he would put on his
coat and trudge home to his wife and family.</p>
<p>The woman in the workhouse remembers that once, when Reed was
a very old man past work, he came to their cottage for
something, and while he stood waiting at the entrance, a
little boy ran in and asked his mother for a piece of bread
and butter with sugar on it. Old Reed glared at him, and
shaking his big stick, exclaimed, "I'd give you sugar with
this if you were my boy!" and so terrible did he look in his
anger at the luxury of the times, that the little boy burst
out crying and ran away!</p>
<p>What chiefly interested me about this old man was that he was
a deer-stealer of the days when that offence was common in
the country. It was not so great a crime as sheep-stealing,
for which men were hanged; taking a deer was punished with
nothing worse than hard labour, as a rule. But Reed was never
caught; he would labour his full time and steal away after
dark over the downs, to return in the small hours with a deer
on his back. It was not for his own consumption; he wanted
the money for which he sold it in Salisbury; and it is
probable that he was in league with other poachers, as it is
hard to believe that he could capture the animals
single-handed.</p>
<p>After his death it was found that old Reed had left a hundred
pounds to each of his two surviving daughters, and it was a
wonder to everybody how he had managed not only to bring up a
family and keep himself out of the workhouse to the end of
his long life, but to leave so large a sum of money. One can
only suppose that he was a rigid economist and never had a
week's illness, and that by abstaining from beer and tobacco
he was able to save a couple of shillings each week out of
his wages of seven or eight shillings; this, in forty years,
would make the two hundred pounds with something over.</p>
<p>It is not a very rare thing to find a farm-labourer like old
Reed of Odstock, with not only a strong preference for a
particular kind of work, but a love of it as compelling as
that of an artist for his art. Some friends of mine whom I
went to visit over the border in Dorset told me of an
enthusiast of this description who had recently died in the
village. "What a pity you did not come sooner," they said.
Alas! it is nearly always so; on first coming to stay at a
village one is told that it has but just lost its oldest and
most interesting inhabitant—a relic of the olden time.</p>
<p>This man had taken to the scythe as Reed had to the flail,
and was never happy unless he had a field to mow. He was a
very tall old man, so lean that he looked like a skeleton,
the bones covered with a skin as brown as old leather, and he
wore his thin grey hair and snow-white beard very long. He
rode on a white donkey, and was usually seen mounted
galloping down the village street, hatless, his old brown,
bare feet and legs drawn up to keep them from the ground, his
scythe over his shoulder. "Here comes old Father Time," they
would cry, as they called him, and run to the door to gaze
with ever fresh delight at the wonderful old man as he rushed
by, kicking and shouting at his donkey to make him go faster.
He was always in a hurry, hunting for work with furious zeal,
and when he got a field to mow so eager was he that he would
not sleep at home, even if it was close by, but would lie
down on the grass at the side of the field and start working
at dawn, between two and three o'clock, quite three hours
before the world woke up to its daily toil.</p>
<p>The name of Reed, the zealous thresher with the flail, serves
to remind me of yet another Reed, a woman who died a few
years ago aged ninety-four, and whose name should be
cherished in one of the downland villages. She was a native
of Barford St. Martin on the Nadder, one of two villages, the
other being Wishford, on the Wylye river, the inhabitants of
which have the right to go into Groveley Wood, an immense
forest on the Wilton estate, to obtain wood for burning, each
person being entitled to take home as much wood as he or she
can carry. The people of Wishford take green wood, but those
of Barford only dead, they having bartered their right at a
remote period to cut growing trees for a yearly sum of five
pounds, which the lord of the manor still pays to the
village, and, in addition, the right to take dead wood.</p>
<p>It will be readily understood that this right possessed by
the people of two villages, both situated within a mile of
the forest, has been a perpetual source of annoyance to the
noble owners in modern times, since the strict preservation
of game, especially of pheasants, has grown to be almost a
religion to the landowners. Now it came to pass that about
half a century or longer ago, the Pembroke of that time made
the happy discovery, as he imagined, that there was nothing
to show that the Barford people had any right to the dead
wood. They had been graciously allowed to take it, as was the
case all over the country at that time, and that was all. At
once he issued an edict prohibiting the taking of dead wood
from the forest by the villagers, and great as the loss was
to them they acquiesced; not a man of Barford St. Martin
dared to disobey the prohibition or raise his voice against
it. Grace Reed then determined to oppose the mighty earl, and
accompanied by four other women of the village boldly went to
the wood and gathered their sticks and brought them home.
They were summoned before the magistrates and fined, and on
their refusal to pay were sent to prison; but the very next
day they were liberated and told that a mistake had been
made, that the matter had been inquired into, and it had been
found that the people of Barford did really have the right
they had exercised so long to take dead wood from the forest.</p>
<p>As a result of the action of these women the right has not
been challenged since, and on my last visit to Barford, a few
days before writing this chapter, I saw three women coming
down from the forest with as much dead wood as they could
carry on their heads and backs. But how near they came to
losing their right! It was a bold, an unheard-of thing which
they did, and if there had not been a poor cottage woman with
the spirit to do it at the proper moment the right could
never have been revived.</p>
<p>Grace Reed's children's children are living at Barford now;
they say that to the very end of her long life she preserved
a very clear memory of the people and events of the village
in the old days early in the last century. They say, too,
that in recalling the far past, the old people and scenes
would present themselves so vividly to her mind that she
would speak of them as of recent things, and would say to
some one fifty years younger than herself, "Can't you
remember it? Surely you haven't forgotten it when 'twas the
talk of the village!"</p>
<p>It is a common illusion of the very aged, and I had an
amusing instance of it in my old Hindon friend when he gave
me his first impressions of Bath as he saw it about the year
1835. What astonished him most were the sedan-chairs, for he
had never even heard of such a conveyance, but here in this
city of wonders you met them in every street. Then he added,
"But you've been to Bath and of course you've seen them, and
know all about it."</p>
<p>About firewood-gathering by the poor in woods and forests, my
old friend of Fonthill Bishop says that the people of the
villages adjacent to the Fonthill and Great Ridge Woods were
allowed to take as much dead wood as they wanted from those
places. She was accustomed to go to the Great Ridge Wood,
which was even wilder and more like a natural forest in those
days than it is now. It was fully two miles from her village,
a longish distance to carry a heavy load, and it was her
custom after getting the wood out to bind it firmly in a
large barrel-shaped bundle or faggot, as in that way she
could roll it down the smooth steep slopes of the down and so
get her burden home without so much groaning and sweating.
The great wood was then full of hazel-trees, and produced
such an abundance of nuts that from mid-July to September
people flocked to it for the nutting from all the country
round, coming even from Bath and Bristol to load their carts
with nuts in sacks for the market. Later, when the wood began
to be more strictly preserved for sporting purposes, the
rabbits were allowed to increase excessively, and during the
hard winters they attacked the hazel-trees, gnawing off the
bark, until this most useful and profitable wood the forest
produced—the scrubby oaks having little value—was
well-nigh extirpated. By and by pheasants as well as rabbits
were strictly preserved, and the firewood-gatherers were
excluded altogether. At present you find dead wood lying
about all over the place, abundantly as in any primitive
forest, where trees die of old age or disease, or are blown
down or broken off by the winds and are left to rot on the
ground, overgrown with ivy and brambles. But of all this dead
wood not a stick to boil a kettle may be taken by the
neighbouring poor lest the pheasants should be disturbed or a
rabbit be picked up.</p>
<p>Some more of the old dame's recollections will be given in
the next chapter, showing what the condition of the people
was in this district about the year 1830, when the poor
farm-labourers were driven by hunger and misery to revolt
against their masters—the farmers who were everywhere
breaking up the downs with the plough to sow more and still
more corn, who were growing very fat and paying higher and
higher rents to their fat landlords, while the wretched men
that drove the plough had hardly enough to satisfy their
hunger.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />