<h2>A WOMAN IN GREY</h2>
<p>The mothers of Professors were indulged in the practice of jumping
at conclusions, and were praised for their impatience of the slow process
of reason.</p>
<p>Professors have written of the mental habits of women as though they
accumulated generation by generation upon women, and passed over their
sons. Professors take it for granted, obviously by some process
other than the slow process of reason, that women derive from their
mothers and grandmothers, and men from their fathers and grandfathers.
This, for instance, was written lately: “This power [it matters
not what] would be about equal in the two sexes but for the influence
of heredity, which turns the scale in favour of the woman, as for long
generations the surroundings and conditions of life of the female sex
have developed in her a greater degree of the power in question than
circumstances have required from men.” “Long generations”
of subjection are, strangely enough, held to excuse the timorousness
and the shifts of women to-day. But the world, unknowing, tampers
with the courage of its sons by such a slovenly indulgence. It
tampers with their intelligence by fostering the ignorance of women.</p>
<p>And yet Shakespeare confessed the participation of man and woman
in their common heritage. It is Cassius who speaks:</p>
<blockquote><p>“Have you not love enough to bear with me<br/>
When that rash humour which my mother gave me<br/>
Makes me forgetful?”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>And Brutus who replies:</p>
<blockquote><p>“Yes, Cassius, and from henceforth<br/>
When you are over-earnest with your Brutus<br/>
He’ll think your mother chides, and leave you so.”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Dryden confessed it also in his praises of Anne Killigrew:</p>
<blockquote><p>“If by traduction came thy mind,<br/>
Our wonder is the less to find<br/>
A soul so charming from a stock so good.<br/>
Thy father was transfused into thy blood.”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The winning of Waterloo upon the Eton playgrounds is very well; but
there have been some other, and happily minor, fields that were not
won—that were more or less lost. Where did this loss take
place, if the gains were secured at football? This inquiry is
not quite so cheerful as the other. But while the victories were
once going forward in the playground, the defeats or disasters were
once going forward in some other place, presumably. And this was
surely the place that was not a playground, the place where the future
wives of the football players were sitting still while their future
husbands were playing football.</p>
<p>This is the train of thought that followed the grey figure of a woman
on a bicycle in Oxford Street. She had an enormous and top-heavy
omnibus at her back. All the things on the near side of the street—the
things going her way—were going at different paces, in two streams,
overtaking and being overtaken. The tributary streets shot omnibuses
and carriages, cabs and carts—some to go her own way, some with
an impetus that carried them curving into the other current, and other
some making a straight line right across Oxford Street into the street
opposite. Besides all the unequal movement, there were the stoppings.
It was a delicate tangle to keep from knotting. The nerves of
the mouths of horses bore the whole charge and answered it, as they
do every day.</p>
<p>The woman in grey, quite alone, was immediately dependent on no nerves
but her own, which almost made her machine sensitive. But this
alertness was joined to such perfect composure as no flutter of a moment
disturbed. There was the steadiness of sleep, and a vigilance
more than that of an ordinary waking.</p>
<p>At the same time, the woman was doing what nothing in her youth could
well have prepared her for. She must have passed a childhood unlike
the ordinary girl’s childhood, if her steadiness or her alertness
had ever been educated, if she had been rebuked for cowardice, for the
egoistic distrust of general rules, or for claims of exceptional chances.
Yet here she was, trusting not only herself but a multitude of other
people; taking her equal risk; giving a watchful confidence to averages—that
last, perhaps, her strangest and greatest success.</p>
<p>No exceptions were hers, no appeals, and no forewarnings. She
evidently had not in her mind a single phrase, familiar to women, made
to express no confidence except in accidents, and to proclaim a prudent
foresight of the less probable event. No woman could ride a bicycle
along Oxford Street with any such baggage as that about her.</p>
<p>The woman in grey had a watchful confidence not only in a multitude
of men but in a multitude of things. And it is very hard for any
untrained human being to practise confidence in things in motion—things
full of force, and, what is worse, of forces. Moreover, there
is a supreme difficulty for a mind accustomed to search timorously for
some little place of insignificant rest on any accessible point of stable
equilibrium; and that is the difficulty of holding itself nimbly secure
in an equilibrium that is unstable. Who can deny that women are
generally used to look about for the little stationary repose just described?
Whether in intellectual or in spiritual things, they do not often live
without it.</p>
<p>She, none the less, fled upon unstable equilibrium, escaped upon
it, depended upon it, trusted it, was ’ware of it, was on guard
against it, as she sped amid her crowd her own unstable equilibrium,
her machine’s, that of the judgment, the temper, the skill, the
perception, the strength of men and horses.</p>
<p>She had learnt the difficult peace of suspense. She had learnt
also the lowly and self-denying faith in common chances. She had
learnt to be content with her share—no more—in common security,
and to be pleased with her part in common hope. For all this,
it may be repeated, she could have had but small preparation.
Yet no anxiety was hers, no uneasy distrust and disbelief of that human
thing—an average of life and death.</p>
<p>To this courage the woman in grey had attained with a spring, and
she had seated herself suddenly upon a place of detachment between earth
and air, freed from the principal detentions, weights, and embarrassments
of the usual life of fear. She had made herself, as it were, light,
so as not to dwell either in security or danger, but to pass between
them. She confessed difficulty and peril by her delicate evasions,
and consented to rest in neither. She would not owe safety to
the mere motionlessness of a seat on the solid earth, but she used gravitation
to balance the slight burdens of her wariness and her confidence.
She put aside all the pride and vanity of terror, and leapt into an
unsure condition of liberty and content.</p>
<p>She leapt, too, into a life of moments. No pause was possible
to her as she went, except the vibrating pause of a perpetual change
and of an unflagging flight. A woman, long educated to sit still,
does not suddenly learn to live a momentary life without strong momentary
resolution. She has no light achievement in limiting not only
her foresight, which must become brief, but her memory, which must do
more; for it must rather cease than become brief. Idle memory
wastes time and other things. The moments of the woman in grey
as they dropped by must needs disappear, and be simply forgotten, as
a child forgets. Idle memory, by the way, shortens life, or shortens
the sense of time, by linking the immediate past clingingly to the present.
Here may possibly be found one of the reasons for the length of a child’s
time, and for the brevity of the time that succeeds. The child
lets his moments pass by and quickly become remote through a thousand
little successive oblivions. He has not yet the languid habit
of recall.</p>
<p>“Thou art my warrior,” said Volumnia. “I
holp to frame thee.”</p>
<p>Shall a man inherit his mother’s trick of speaking, or her
habit and attitude, and not suffer something, against his will, from
her bequest of weakness, and something, against his heart, from her
bequest of folly? From the legacies of an unlessoned mind, a woman’s
heirs-male are not cut off in the Common Law of the generations of mankind.
Brutus knew that the valour of Portia was settled upon his sons.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />