<p><SPAN name="link2H_4_0037" id="link2H_4_0037"></SPAN></p>
<br/>
<h2> LETTER XXXVII </h2>
<p>MR. LOVELACE, TO JOHN BELFORD, ESQ. FRIDAY NIGHT, MAY 19.</p>
<p>When I have opened my view to thee so amply as I have done in my former
letters; and have told thee, that my principal design is but to bring
virtue to a trial, that, if virtue, it need not be afraid of; and that the
reward of it will be marriage (that is to say, if, after I have carried my
point, I cannot prevail upon her to live with me the life of honour;* for
that thou knowest is the wish of my heart); I am amazed at the repetition
of thy wambling nonsense.</p>
<p>* See Vol. III. Letter XVIII.</p>
<p>I am of opinion with thee, that some time hence, when I am grown wiser, I
shall conclude, that there is nothing but vanity, conceit, and nonsense,
in my present wild schemes. But what is this saying, but that I must be
first wiser?</p>
<p>I do not intend to let this matchless creature slide through my fingers.</p>
<p>Art thou able to say half the things in her praise, that I have said, and
am continually saying or writing?</p>
<p>Her gloomy father cursed the sweet creature, because she put it out of his
wicked power to compel her to have the man she hated. Thou knowest how
little merit she has with me on this score.—And shall I not try the
virtue I intended, upon full proof, to reward, because her father is a
tyrant?—Why art thou thus eternally reflecting upon so excellent a
woman, as if thou wert assured she would fail in the trial?—Nay,
thou declarest, every time thou writest on the subject, that she will,
that she must yield, entangled as she is: and yet makest her virtue the
pretence of thy solicitude for her.</p>
<p>An instrument of the vile James Harlowe, dost thou call me?—O Jack!
how could I curse thee!—I am instrument of that brother! of that
sister! But mark the end—and thou shalt see what will become of that
brother, and of that sister!</p>
<p>Play not against me my own acknowledged sensibilities, I desire thee.
Sensibilities, which at the same time that they contradict thy charge of
an adamantine heart in thy friend, thou hadst known nothing of, had I not
communicated them to thee.</p>
<p>If I ruin such a virtue, sayest thou!—Eternal monotonist!—Again;
the most immaculate virtue may be ruined by men who have no regard to
their honour, and who make a jest of the most solemn oaths, &c. What
must be the virtue that will be ruined without oaths? Is not the world
full of these deceptions? And are not lovers' oaths a jest of hundreds of
years' standing? And are not cautions against the perfidy of our sex a
necessary part of the female education?</p>
<p>I do intend to endeavour to overcome myself; but I must first try, if I
cannot overcome this lady. Have I not said, that the honour of her sex is
concerned that I should try?</p>
<p>Whenever thou meetest with a woman of but half her perfections, thou wilt
marry—Do, Jack.</p>
<p>Can a girl be degraded by trials, who is not overcome?</p>
<p>I am glad that thou takest crime to thyself, for not endeavouring to
convert the poor wretches whom others have ruined. I will not recriminate
upon thee, Belford, as I might, when thou flatterest thyself that thou
never ruinedst the morals of any young creature, who otherwise would not
have been corrupted—the palliating consolation of an Hottentot
heart, determined rather to gluttonize on the garbage of other foul
feeders than to reform.—But tell me, Jack, wouldst thou have spared
such a girl as my Rosebud, had I not, by my example, engaged thy
generosity? Nor was my Rosebud the only girl I spared:—When my power
was acknowledged, who more merciful than thy friend?</p>
<p>It is resistance that inflames desire,<br/>
Sharpens the darts of love, and blows its fire.<br/>
Love is disarm'd that meets with too much ease;<br/>
He languishes, and does not care to please.<br/></p>
<p>The women know this as well as the men. They love to be addressed with
spirit:</p>
<p>And therefore 'tis their golden fruit they guard<br/>
With so much care, to make profession hard.<br/></p>
<p>Whence, for a by-reflection, the ardent, the complaisant gallant is so
often preferred to the cold, the unadoring husband. And yet the sex do not
consider, that variety and novelty give the ardour and the obsequiousness;
and that, were the rake as much used to them as the husband is, he would
be [and is to his own wife, if married] as indifferent to their favours,
as their husbands are; and the husband, in his turn, would, to another
woman, be the rake. Let the women, upon the whole, take this lesson from a
Lovelace—'Always to endeavour to make themselves as new to a
husband, and to appear as elegant and as obliging to him, as they are
desirous to appear to a lover, and actually were to him as such; and then
the rake, which all women love, will last longer in the husband, than it
generally does.'</p>
<p>But to return:—If I have not sufficiently cleared my conduct to thee
in the above; I refer thee once more to mine of the 13th of last month.*
And pr'ythee, Jack, lay me not under a necessity to repeat the same things
so often. I hope thou readest what I write more than once.</p>
<p>* See Vol. II. Letter XIV.</p>
<p>I am not displeased that thou art so apprehensive of my resentment, that I
cannot miss a day without making thee uneasy. Thy conscience, 'tis plain,
tells thee, that thou has deserved my displeasure: and if it has convinced
thee of that, it will make thee afraid of repeating thy fault. See that
this be the consequence. Else, now that thou hast told me how I can punish
thee, it is very likely that I do punish thee by my silence, although I
have as much pleasure in writing on this charming subject, as thou canst
have in reading what I write.</p>
<p>When a boy, if a dog ran away from me through fear, I generally looked
about for a stone, or a stick; and if neither offered to my hand, I
skinned my hat after him to make him afraid for something. What signifies
power, if we do not exert it?</p>
<p>Let my Lord know, that thou hast scribbled to me. But give him not the
contents of thy epistle. Though a parcel of crude stuff, he would think
there was something in it. Poor arguments will do, when brought in favour
of what we like. But the stupid peer little thinks that this lady is a
rebel to Love. On the contrary, not only he, but all the world believe her
to be a volunteer in his service.—So I shall incur blame, and she
will be pitied, if any thing happen amiss.</p>
<p>Since my Lord's heart is set upon this match, I have written already to
let him know, 'That my unhappy character had given my beloved an
ungenerous diffidence of me. That she is so mother-sick and father-fond,
that she had rather return to Harlowe-place than marry. That she is even
apprehensive that the step she has taken of going off with me will make
the ladies of a family of such rank and honour as ours think slightly of
her. That therefore I desire his Lordship (though this hint, I tell him,
must be very delicately touched) to write me such a letter as I can shew
her; (let him treat me in it ever so freely, I shall not take it amiss, I
tell him, because I know his Lordship takes pleasure in writing to me in a
corrective style). That he may make what offers he pleases on the
marriage. That I desire his presence at the ceremony; that I may take from
his hand the greatest blessing that mortal man can give me.'</p>
<p>I have not absolutely told the lady that I would write to his Lordship to
this effect; yet have given her reason to think I will. So that without
the last necessity I shall not produce the answer I expect from him: for I
am very loth, I own, to make use of any of my family's names for the
furthering of my designs. And yet I must make all secure, before I pull
off the mask. Was not this my motive for bringing her hither?</p>
<p>Thus thou seest that the old peer's letter came very seasonably. I thank
thee for that. But as to his sentences, they cannot possibly do me good. I
was early suffocated with his wisdom of nations. When a boy, I never asked
anything of him, but out flew a proverb; and if the tendency of that was
to deny me, I never could obtain the least favour. This gave me so great
an aversion to the very word, that, when a child, I made it a condition
with my tutor, who was an honest parson, that I would not read my Bible at
all, if he would not excuse me one of the wisest books in it: to which,
however, I had no other objection, than that it was called The Proverbs.
And as for Solomon, he was then a hated character with me, not because of
his polygamy, but because I had conceived him to be such another musty old
fellow as my uncle.</p>
<p>Well, but let us leave old saws to old me. What signifies thy tedious
whining over thy departing relation? Is it not generally agreed that he
cannot recover? Will it not be kind in thee to put him out of his misery?
I hear that he is pestered still with visits from doctors, and
apothecaries, and surgeons; that they cannot cut so deep as the
mortification has gone; and that in every visit, in every scarification,
inevitable death is pronounced upon him. Why then do they keep tormenting
him? Is it not to take away more of his living fleece than of his dead
flesh?—When a man is given over, the fee should surely be refused.
Are they not now robbing his heirs?—What has thou to do, if the will
be as thou'dst have it?—He sent for thee [did he not?] to close his
eyes. He is but an uncle, is he?</p>
<p>Let me see, if I mistake not, it is in the Bible, or some other good book:
can it be in Herodotus?—O I believe it is in Josephus, a half-
sacred, and half-profane author. He tells us of a king of Syria put out of
his pain by his prime minister, or one who deserved to be so for his
contrivance. The story says, if I am right, that he spread a wet cloth
over his face, which killing him, he reigned in his place. A notable
fellow! Perhaps this wet cloth in the original, is what we now call
laudanum; a potion that overspreads the faculties, as the wet cloth did
the face of the royal patient; and the translator knew not how to render
it.</p>
<p>But how like forlorn varlet thou subscribest, 'Thy melancholy friend, J.
BELFORD!' Melancholy! For what? To stand by, and see fair play between an
old man and death? I thought thou hadst been more of a man; that thou art
not afraid of an acute death, a sword's point, to be so plaugily hip'd at
the consequences of a chronical one!—What though the scarificators
work upon him day by day? It's only upon a caput mortuum: and pr'ythee go
to, to use the stylum veterum, and learn of the royal butchers; who, for
sport, (an hundred times worse men than thy Lovelace,) widow ten thousand
at a brush, and make twice as many fatherless—learn of them, I say,
how to support a single death.</p>
<p>But art thou sure, Jack, it is a mortification?—My uncle once gave
promises of such a root-and-branch distemper: but, alas! it turned to a
smart gout-fit; and I had the mortification instead of him.—I have
heard that bark, in proper doses, will arrest a mortification in its
progress, and at last cure it. Let thy uncle's surgeon know, that it is
worth more than his ears, if he prescribe one grain of the bark.</p>
<p>I wish my uncle had given me the opportunity of setting thee a better
example: thou shouldst have seen what a brave fellow I had been. And had I
had occasion to write, my conclusion would have been this: 'I hope the old
Trojan's happy. In that hope, I am so; and</p>
<p>'Thy rejoicing friend, 'R. LOVELACE.'</p>
<p>Dwell not always, Jack, upon one subject. Let me have poor Belton's<br/>
story. The sooner the better. If I can be of service to him, tell<br/>
him he may command me either in purse or person. Yet the former with<br/>
a freer will than the latter; for how can I leave my goddess? But<br/>
I'll issue my commands to my other vassals to attend thy summons.<br/></p>
<p>If ye want head, let me know. If not, my quota, on this occasion, is<br/>
money.<br/></p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />