<h2><SPAN name="page238"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span>CHAPTER XXIV</h2>
<p style="text-align: center" class="gutsumm">Welcombe—Snitterfield—Warwick—Leicester’s
Hospital—St. Mary’s Church and the Beauchamp
Chapel.</p>
<p><span class="smcap">The</span> distance between Stratford and
Warwick is eight miles, and the road, the broad highway, runs
direct. It is an excellent road, but for those who do not
care overmuch for main routes, however beautiful, in these times,
a more excellent way, for a portion of the journey at any rate,
is by Snitterfield. You turn off to the left from the
tree-bordered main road at a point a mile and a half from
Stratford, well in view of the lofty obelisk on the hillside at
Welcombe which was built in 1873 to perpetuate the memory of the
obscure person, a certain Mark Phillips, who had erected the
mansion of Welcombe Lodge in 1869. Without the aid of this
monument he would by now have been completely forgotten; but it
is 120 feet in height and prominently visible from amazing
distances, and so its object is attained. Not perhaps
exactly in the way originally intended, for being in a district
where most things are associated in some way with Shakespeare, it
is generally supposed to be one of them, and when the
disappointed stranger finds himself thus deluded, he usually
reflects upon Mark Phillips in the most scathing terms.</p>
<p>Up at Welcombe are those Dingles already referred to.
The way to Snitterfield takes you uphill, past lands that once
belonged to Shakespeare, and by a pond which is all that is left
of the lake of Snitterfield Hall, a mansion demolished in
1820. Here the road has reached a considerable height,
commanding beautiful views down over the valley of the Avon at
Hampton Lucy and Charlecote.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><SPAN name="page239"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span>
<SPAN href="images/p239.jpg">
<ANTIMG alt="Leicester’s Hospital, Warwick" title= "Leicester’s Hospital, Warwick" src="images/p239.jpg" /></SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN name="page240"></SPAN><span class="pagenum">p.
240</span>Snitterfield village is embowered amid elms. The
church is a rustic building in the Decorated style, with
seventeenth-century pulpit and enriched woodwork of the same
period furnishing the altar-rails. Here the Rev. Richard
Jago was vicar for twenty years, dying in 1781. His duties
did not bear heavily upon him, and he occupied most of his time
in writing a long poem, “Edgehill, or the Rural Prospect
Delineated and Moralised,” a published work which no one
ever reads, the prospect of moralising held forth on the
title-page scaring the timid. His vicarage remains, and on
its lawn are still the three silver birches planted by his three
daughters. There are some beautiful lime-trees and an
ancient yew in the churchyard. No relic of Henry
Shakespeare, William Shakespeare’s uncle, or of his father
or grandfather, who lived at Snitterfield, now remains.</p>
<p>The road now trends to the right, and, steeply descending,
regains the main route into Warwick. The town of Warwick
looms nobly before the traveller approaching from the west.
The broad level highway makes direct for it, and over the trees
that border the road you see, as a first glimpse of the historic
place, the lofty tower of St. Mary’s church, rising
apparently an enormous height, and looking a most worshipful
specimen of architecture. On a nearer approach it sinks
into less prominence, and, passing through an old suburb, with a
porch-house on the right, formerly the “Malt-Shovel”
inn, the West Gate of the town, with its chapel above it, takes
prominence.</p>
<p style="text-align: center">
<SPAN href="images/p240.jpg">
<ANTIMG alt="Leicester’s Hospital: The Courtyard" title= "Leicester’s Hospital: The Courtyard" src="images/p240.jpg" /></SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN name="page241"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span>The
West Gate is one of the two surviving ancient gateways of Warwick
and leads steeply up into the town beneath a rude-ribbed arch of
great massiveness, based sturdily upon the dull red sandstone
rock. It is a very picturesque and in every way striking
composition, and if it were not for the even more picturesque
scene provided by Leicester’s Hospital, just within the
gate, would be often illustrated. But the nodding black and
white gables of that almshouse effectually attract the greater
notice. The West Gate, with the chapel above, dates from
about 1360. Nowadays it is almost only the curious visitor
who passes through the long, tunnel-like arch, gazing with
astonishment at the sudden outcrop of rock on which the building
stands, and at the ribbed stone roof supporting the chapel.
A roadway has been made to the right of the gate, through the
town walls, and the traffic goes that way by choice, obscuring
the ancient defensive function and importance of this entrance to
the town. A chapel also occupies the like position over the
East Gate, and shows that the people of Warwick prayed as well as
watched.</p>
<p>The Leicester Hospital, so-called because founded by Robert
Dudley, Earl of Leicester, looks down with admirable effect from
its elevated position on the left hand, as you come up into the
town; but it would look even better if it were properly
kept. It very urgently needs a thorough overhauling, not in
the necessity for any structural repairs, but with the object of
treating the buildings in a sympathetic and cultured way.
There is a vast difference between photographic views of what is
called, in the Wardour Street way,
“Leycester’s” Hospital, and the actual effect
of looking upon the place with one’s own eyes. The
Hospital, in fact, looks very much better in photographs than it
reveals itself to the disappointed gaze: simply because those
responsible for the upkeep of it do not understand <SPAN name="page242"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span>how to
treat the old timbers, and have smeared them over with black
paint.</p>
<p>This Hospital or Almshouse occupies the site of the ancient
united religious and charitable guilds of Holy Trinity and St.
George-the-Martyr, with some of their surviving buildings.
These united fraternities had numerous activities. They
supported the priests who served in the chapels over East and
West gates, and contributed towards the keep of others in the
parish church; being also largely responsible for the maintenance
of the great bridge, now and for long past in ruins, which
carried the Banbury road across the Avon, in front of Warwick
Castle. They also supported eight poor persons of the
Guild. In common with all other religious, or
semi-religious institutions, the Guild was dissolved in the time
of Henry the Eighth, and its buildings were granted by Edward the
Sixth to Sir Nicholas le Strange, from whom Dudley acquired them;
or, according to another version of these transactions, Dudley
had a gift of them direct from the town of Warwick, to which the
Guild had voluntarily transferred its property. This gift
to the magnificent Dudley, the newly-created Earl of Leicester
and possessor of vast wealth and power, was not for his own
personal advantage, but for the purpose of helping him to
establish an almshouse, which he at once proceeded to do, in the
interest of “twelve impotent persons, not having above
£5 per annum of their own, and such as either had been, or
should be maimed in the warrs of the Queen, her service, her
heirs and successors, especially under the conduct of the said
Earl or his heirs, or had been tenants to him and his heirs, and
born in the Counties of Warwick or Gloucester, or having their
dwelling there for five years before; and in case there happen to
be none such hurt in the Warrs, then other poor of Kenilworth, <SPAN name="page243"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span>Warwick,
Stratford super Avon in this county, or of Wootton under Edge or
Erlingham in Gloucestershire, to be recommended by the Minister
and Churchwardens where they last had their aboad; which poor men
are to have Liveries (viz. Gowns of blew cloth, with a Ragged
Staff embroydered on the left sleeve) and not to go into the Town
without them.”</p>
<p>Leicester and his magnificence, and all the direct lineage of
the Dudleys have disappeared long ago. Leicester himself,
and after him his brother Ambrose, died childless, and the
patronage of the Hospital passed to their sister Mary, who
married Sir Henry Sidney of Penshurst. Thence it has
descended to Lord de L’isle and Dudley, the present
representative of the Dudleys and the Sidneys.</p>
<p>The entrance is by a stone gateway bearing the inscription
“Hospitivm Collegiatvm Roberti Dvdlei Comitis
Leycestriæ 1571.” The great Dudley’s
picturesque buildings deserve to be better kept, for they are
among the daintiest examples of highly enriched half-timbering in
England. Passing beneath an archway with a sundial
overhead, you enter a small quadrangle with a quaint staircase on
one side, and gables with elaborate pierced verge-boards looking
down upon the scene. The famous Warwick badge of the Bear
and Ragged Staff surmounts the finials and lurks under the eaves,
in frequent repetition, together with the Porcupine, that of the
Sidneys. On the further side, over the windows of the
Master’s Lodge, is the painted inscription, “Honour
all men; love the brotherhood; fear God; and honour the
King,” a quadripartite injunction which we may confidently
affirm, no man ever yet observed. Our own—but much
more other people’s—natures will have to be very
greatly amended before we are prepared to “honour all
men.”</p>
<p><SPAN name="page244"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span>You
pay sixpence to be shown over the Hospital, and one of the twelve
bedesmen acts as guide to the buildings and the very
miscellaneous collections accumulated in them. Nowadays the
“blue gown” has become black, and the Bear and Ragged
Staff badge is in silver, instead of embroidery. A welcome
change has come over their headgear. Instead of the more or
less rusty silk hats they wore during the greater part of the
nineteenth century, they have now a “beefeater” hat
similar to those worn by the Tower warders in London, but wholly
in black. The bedesmen no longer dine together as once they
did, but each separately in his own quarters, because they could
not always obey the injunction to “love the
brotherhood,” and grew cantankerous in company, and
quarrelled; but here is still the kitchen they have in common,
containing many other things one does not expect to find in
kitchens; an odd assortment, a Malay kris, a Russian helmet from
the stricken fields of the Crimea, an oak cabinet from Kenilworth
Castle, and a framed piece of needlework said to have been
executed by Lady Robert Dudley, whom “historians”
will persist in styling either by her maiden name, Amy Robsart,
or else by the title of Countess of Leicester, she having died or
been murdered many years before her husband became an Earl.
Perhaps we had better emphasise the word <i>said</i>.
Beneath that framed piece of needlework is a Saxon—more or
less Saxon—chair. A piece of Gibraltar rock,
polished, is a further item displaying the catholicity of taste
displayed here, together with the muskets with which the inmates
of the Hospital were armed when the Chartist rising was supposed
to threaten the security of Warwick.</p>
<p style="text-align: center">
<SPAN href="images/p244.jpg">
<ANTIMG alt="Leicester’s Hospital: One of the Brethren" title= "Leicester’s Hospital: One of the Brethren" src="images/p244.jpg" /></SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN name="page245"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span>The
banqueting hall, a surviving portion of the old Guild buildings,
very greatly needs restoration. It has been grossly used
and subdivided, the Minstrel Gallery having been taken out of it
in order to provide a fine additional room for the Master’s
residence; the Master being, of course, a clergyman with a fine
fat stipend: the person who has the very best of it at
Leicester’s Hospital. In this once-beautiful
banqueting hall, with its noble roof of Spanish chestnut,
whitened with age, James the First was entertained by Fulke
Greville in 1617. Coal-bins and wash-houses now subdivide
it.</p>
<p>Flights of stone stairs lead up from the Hospital over the
West Gate and into the chapel, a fine spacious building where the
twelve old men have to attend every week-day morning at ten
o’clock and listen to the perfunctory service read by the
Master. In addition to this spiritual treat, they attend
service at the parish church on Sundays. There is nothing
to say about the interior of the chapel; it was
“restored” by Sir Gilbert Scott, and so there would
not be.</p>
<p>For dulness and pretentious ugliness combined, the town of
Warwick would be difficult to match; and the ugliest and dullest
part of it is that main street called Jury Street, stretching
between the West Gate and the East. The ugliness is due to
the great fire of 1694, which destroyed a great part of the town
and necessitated a rebuilding at a period when architects were
obsessed with the idea of designing “stately”
buildings. What they considered stately we nowadays look
upon with a shudder and style heavy and unimaginative.</p>
<p>But the weirdest building in the town is that parish church of
St. Mary whose tower looks in the distance so stately.
There were once ten churches in Warwick and there are now but
two. St. Mary’s was almost entirely destroyed in the
great fire, in consequence of the frightened townsfolk storing
their furniture in it, for safety. The church itself was
not threatened, <SPAN name="page246"></SPAN><span class="pagenum">p.
246</span>but some of the articles hurriedly placed in it were
alight, and thus it shared the fate of much else.</p>
<p>The rebuilding of St. Mary’s was completed in 1704, as
an inscription on the tower informs us. I think those who
placed that inscription here intended a Latin pun, a play upon
the name of Queen Anne and the word anno, for “year”;
for thus it runs: “Annaeauspiciis A° memorabili
1704.” One scarcely knows which is the more
deplorable, the building or the pun; the first, probably, because
not every one can see the play upon words, but the tower is an
outrage impossible to escape.</p>
<p>The bulk and loftiness of it are majestic, but its classic
details in a Gothic framework have a curious effect on the
beholder. They seem, those unhallowed pagan alcoves,
mounting stage by stage toward the skies, like some blasphemous
insinuation. The nave and transepts, rebuilt at the same
time, are, oddly enough, not nearly so offensive, and it is
rather a handsome as well as imposing interior that meets the
stranger’s gaze. It may be that it seems so much
better because, warned by the outside, one expects so much
worse. That familiar ornament in classic architecture, the
“egg and dart,” is an incongruous detail when worked
into the capitals of columns in which the Gothic feeling
predominates, and it sounds quite shocking when described; but
here it comes with a pleasing, if scarcely ecclesiastical effect
in this fine and well-proportioned interior.</p>
<p style="text-align: center">
<SPAN href="images/p246.jpg">
<ANTIMG alt="The Beauchamp Chapel, Warwick" title= "The Beauchamp Chapel, Warwick" src="images/p246.jpg" /></SPAN></p>
<p>The chancel of St. Mary’s, together with the
chapter-house on the north side of it and the Beauchamp Chapel on
the south, escaped the fire, and remain uninjured to this
day. It is possible to peer through the locked iron gates
of the chancel from the nave, which is the only portion of the
church that is to be seen without payment, but to see the
chapter-house, and the <SPAN name="page247"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span>Beauchamp Chapel, to descend to the
crypt and to mount the tower, you must pay and pay and pay
again. The clergy in all the wide radius of the Shakespeare
Country have the keenest scent for sixpences, and would make
excellent business men. Better business men than clergymen,
for all I know. They have long since learnt to charge and
to keep their doors locked until their charges are satisfied; and
none understand the business better than those who have the
keeping of St. Mary’s at Warwick. But, when you have
paid for this and for that and for t’other, and are resting
and reading, and possibly making notes in the nave, it is gross,
I say, and offensive and blackguardly to be followed up and spied
upon and to be asked if you are sketching! “Because
if you are it will be half-a-crown.” I will now leave
this unsavoury subject, wishing the clergy and churchwardens of
St. Mary’s more enlightenment and the people they employ
better discretion.</p>
<p>The chancel, or choir, founded by Thomas Beauchamp, twelfth
Earl of Warwick, who died 1369, is a stately Perpendicular work,
with the altar-tomb of the founder and his wife Katharine, who
died the same year, in the middle. His armoured effigy,
with crosses crosslet displayed on the breastplate, rests its
feet upon a bear, and at the feet of his wife is a lamb. He
holds his wife’s hand.</p>
<p>Around the tomb, in niches, are small figures representing
members of the family, thirty-six in all. In a grave near
by, unmarked by any monument or inscription, lies William Parr,
brother of Katharine Parr, last and surviving wife of Henry the
Eighth. He was created Marquis of Northampton, and died in
1571, sunk to such poverty that no money was forthcoming to bury
him. A few years later, Queen Elizabeth found <SPAN name="page248"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span>a trifle,
and he was decently interred, but no one ever thought it worth
while to mark his resting-place.</p>
<p>Passing the greatly-enriched Easter Sepulchre in the north
wall, the Chapter House is entered by a corridor. In the
centre of this building stands the enormous monument to Fulke
Greville, Lord Brooke, who was murdered by his man-servant in
1628. “Delaying to reward one Hayward, an antient
servant that had spent the most of his time in attendance upon
him,” says Dugdale, “he received a mortall stab in
the back by the same man, then private with him in his
bed-chamber at Brooke House in London, 30th Sept. ann. 1628, who,
to consummate the tragedy, went into another room, and, having
lockit the dore, pierced his own bowells with a sword.”</p>
<p>The crypt is the oldest part of St. Mary’s, with Norman
pillars. It contains the old ducking-stool for scolding
women.</p>
<p>The entrance to that most gorgeous relic of old St.
Mary’s, the Beauchamp Chapel, which is the principal item
in the list of these ecclesiastical showmen, is on the east side
of the south transept. The mortuary magnificence of the
Beauchamps obscures the dedication of the Chapel to Our Lady, and
the generations that have passed since the building of it between
the years 1443 and 1464, and its final consecration in 1475, have
rightly agreed to style it by the name by which it now, and
always has been, popularly known. It reminds one very
keenly of the insincere modern cant phrase which forms the
dedication of memorial stained-glass windows. “To the
Glory of God and to the memory of —,” a shabby sop to
the Almighty at which the soul revolts. The very entrance
is obviously proprietary, and shows us that this is really the
Beauchamp mausoleum.</p>
<p style="text-align: center">
<SPAN href="images/p248.jpg">
<ANTIMG alt="The Crypt of St. Mary’s, Warwick" title= "The Crypt of St. Mary’s, Warwick" src="images/p248.jpg" /></SPAN></p>
<p>It is a magnificent entrance, a very highly-enriched work in
<SPAN name="page249"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span>panelled
and sculptured stone, with the Warwick Bear and Ragged Staff on
either side, facing the Beauchamp shield of crosses
crosslet. Near it, on the wall, and green with neglect, is
the fine brass to Thomas Beauchamp, thirteenth Earl of Warwick,
who died in 1401, and of his wife Margaret, who died 1406.
It seems strange that out of all the money contributed by
visitors, and chiefly on account of the Beauchamp monuments,
there cannot be some small surplus set aside for a restoration of
the altar-tomb on which these figures were placed up to that time
when the great fire destroyed it and much of the church. It
is not well that so fine an example should remain on a wall; the
most unsuitable position for a monumental brass. The Earl,
who is given the old original name of the Norman Beauchamps who
came over with the Conqueror—“Bellocampo,”
meaning “fair field”—is in complete armour,
which has, besides the crosses crosslet of the family arms, a
decorative border of ragged staves around his helmet. The
Countess is habited in an heraldic mantle of crosses
crosslet.</p>
<p>This Thomas Beauchamp was not so great or distinguished a man
as his son, in whose honour the Beauchamp Chapel was erected.</p>
<p>The Beauchamp Chapel is slightly below the level of the south
transept and is entered down a flight of steps. Photographs
give an exaggerated idea of its size, but scarcely do justice to
its beauty and the extreme richness of its details, still
remarkable, although the ancient coloured glass has been mostly
destroyed and the golden images of the altar have
disappeared. It is indeed due to the second Lord Brooke,
who although a partisan of the Cromwellian side during the Civil
War, was naturally keen to preserve the glories of Warwick, that
the Chapel was not wholly destroyed in that age of tumults.
Lord Brooke was the son of that Sir Fulke <SPAN name="page250"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span>Greville,
first Baron Brooke, to whom James the First had granted Warwick
Castle in 1605, and he no doubt looked upon the Beauchamps as
ancestors, although there was never the remotest connection
between that ancient martial family and his own, the Grevels, or
Grevilles, who descend from the old wool-merchants of the name at
Chipping Campden and elsewhere in the Cotswolds. He adopted
them, and took them over, so to speak, with the Castle; and a
good thing too, for these old monuments, that they had so
fortunate an adoption.</p>
<p>The building is in the middle period of the Perpendicular
style, that last manifestation of the Gothic spirit and the
feudal ages, and is elaborately groined in stone. The great
Richard Beauchamp, who lies here in these gorgeous surroundings,
directed by will the building of the Chapel and the erection of
his monument. He was the greatest as yet of his name, and
appears to have been perfectly conscious of it, if we may judge
by the state in which he ordained to lie. He was also to
prove the greatest to all time, for although his son Henry who
succeeded him at his death in 1439 was created Duke of Warwick,
his career was undistinguished and soon ended, for he died in
1445. With him ended the long line of his race.</p>
<p>Richard Beauchamp, fourteenth Earl of Warwick, whose effigy
lies here in lonely magnificence on the altar-tomb he directed to
be made, as though he were too great a personage to have his wife
beside him, was holder of the greatest offices of State of his
period. The long inscription round his tomb tells us of
some of these responsible posts—</p>
<blockquote><p>“Preieth devoutly for the Sowel whom god
assoille of one of the moost worshipful Knights in his dayes of
monhode and conning Richard Beauchamp, late Earl <SPAN name="page251"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span>of
Warrewik, lord Despenser of Bergevenny and of mony other grete
lordships whos body resteth here vnder this tumbe in a fulfeire
vout of stone set on the bare rooch the whuch visited with longe
siknes in the Castel of Roan therinne decessed ful cristenly the
last day of April the yer of oure lord god A mccccxxix, he being
at that tyme Lieutenant gen’al and governer of the Roialme
of ffraunce and of the Duchie of Normandie by sufficient Autorite
of oure Sou’aigne lord the King Harry the vi., the whuch
body with grete deliberacon’ and ful worshipful conduit Bi
See And by lond was broght to Warrewik the iiii day of October
the yer aboueseide and was leide with ful solemn exequies in a
feir chest made of stone in this Chirche afore the west dore of
this Chapel according to his last wille and Testament therin to
rest til this Chapel by him devised i’ his liff were made
Al the whuche Chapel founded on the Rooch And alle the membres
thereof his Executours dede fully make and Apparaille By the
Auctorite of his Seide last Wille and Testament And therafter By
the same Auctorite Theydide Translate fful worshipfully the seide
Body into the vout abouseide, Honured be god therfore.”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>History comes in few places with such vivid reality to the
modern person as it does here. Unmoved, because too often
without the mental agility to perceive the significance of it, we
look upon the old royal arms of England as they were for
centuries, until the time of George the Third, and see the
quartering of the Lions of England with the Lilies of France;
that proud boast, an idle pretension long before Calais, the
final French possession of England, was lost, in the reign of
Queen Mary. But standing before the tomb of the great
Beauchamp, and reading his sounding titles, no mere ornamental
designations, but the veritable responsible offices of State, as
“Lieutenant-General and Governor <SPAN name="page252"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span>of the
Realm of France and the Duchy of Normandy,” we live again
in tremendous days. No tomb of King or Emperor impresses me
as does that of this puissant representative and viceroy of such
sovereignty.</p>
<p>Beneath a hooped frame or “hearse” of gilded brass
which formed the support for a gorgeous pall of crimson velvet
lies the effigy of this great soldier and statesman, also in
brass, once highly gilt. His bared head rests upon his
helmet and his feet upon a griffin and a muzzled bear, and the
Garter is on his left leg. The arms are raised in the usual
attitude of prayer, but the hands themselves are not joined, as
usual. They are, instead, represented apart, in the
priestly pose during the celebration of mass.</p>
<p>The rich crimson velvet pall that covered the effigy and was
lifted for its inspection by every visitor, was at last removed,
on the plea of the injury it was supposed to be causing the
figure, and has now unaccountably disappeared.</p>
<p>In niches around the altar-tomb are little figures
representing his family, and sons- and daughters-in-law: fourteen
in all; such great names as Henry Beauchamp, his son and
successor, with his wife Cicely; Richard Neville, Earl of
Salisbury and his wife Alice; Richard Neville, afterwards Earl of
Warwick and his wife Anne; Edmund Beaufort, Duke of Somerset, and
his wife Eleanor; Humphrey Stafford, Duke of Buckingham, and his
wife Anne; John Talbot, Earl of Shrewsbury, and his wife
Margaret; and George Neville, Lord Latimer, with his wife
Elizabeth.</p>
<p>Against the north wall of the Chapel is the costly and
ostentatious monument of Robert Dudley, Earl of Leicester, rising
in lofty stages of coloured marbles; a vulgar piece of
work. The effigies of Dudley and his wife Lætitia,
who survived him forty-six years and <SPAN name="page253"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span>died in 1634, are gorgeously robed
and painted in lifelike fashion. The mantle of the Order of
the Garter covers his armour, and the Garter itself is shown on
his leg. It is with surpassing interest that one looks upon
the chief of these figures; that Dudley who came near being
King-Consort of Elizabeth, and died in 1588, at the comparatively
early age of fifty-four; the vain and magnificent creature
suspected of the murder of his first wife and traditionally
poisoned by his last, who is said to have given him the lethal
cup he had intended for herself. A long Latin epitaph
sonorously recounts his many titles and honours, with the hardy
belief in “a certain hope of his resurrection in
Christ.”</p>
<p>Against the opposite wall is the altar-tomb of that
“noble Impe, Robert of Dudley,” infant son of the
last, who died in his fourth year, 1584. A circlet round
the brow of the little figure bears the Leicester badge, the
cinquefoil. Last of the Dudley monuments, is the altar-tomb
of Ambrose, styled the “good Earl,” in tacit
contradistinction from his brother Robert, the wicked one.
The good Ambrose was not given length of days, for he died the
year after his brother. He also is shown in armour and
wears a coronet and the Garter. How he was given the post
of “Mayster of the Ordinaunce,” made Chief Butler of
England, and was altogether a personage of many offices, his
epitaph tells. With him and the “noble Impe,”
his brother’s infant son, the legitimate race of the
Dudleys died.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />