<h2><SPAN name="page49"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span>CHAPTER VI</h2>
<p class="gutsumm">Shakespeare’s
Birthplace—Restoration, of sorts—The business of the
Showman—The Birthplace Museum—The Shakespearean
garden.</p>
<p><span class="smcap">To</span> Henley Street most visitors to
Stratford-on-Avon first turn their steps; a little disappointed
to discover that it is by no means the best street in the town
and must have been rather a poor outskirt at the time when John
Shakespeare came in from Snitterfield, to set up business in a
small way. There is, as the sentimental pilgrim will very
soon discover for himself, a plentiful lack of sentiment nowadays
in the business of showing Shakespeare’s Birthplace.
For it is a business, and conducted as it is on extremely
hard-headed lines, yields a considerable profit; a profit
disposed of strictly according to the terms on which the
Shakespeare’s Birthplace Trust is defined in its
Parliamentary powers. Enough has already been said to show
the sensitive soul that his sensibilities are apt to be extremely
tried when he comes this way; but then, to be sure, there can be
but a small proportion of such among the 40,000 persons who
annually pay their sixpences (and another to see the Birthplace
Museum next door). Sometimes, when the dog-star rages and
tourists most do gad about, a solid phalanx of visitors, each
provided with his ticket from the office down the street, will be
found lined up, waiting, like the queues outside the London
theatres, for earlier arrivals to be quickly disposed of.
The bloom of sentiment, as delicate as that upon a plum or peach,
is rudely rubbed off by these things, by rules and regulations
and the numbered ticket; but the very fame of Shakespeare and the
increasing number of visitors who have, or think they
have—or at the very least of it think they ought to
have—an intelligent interest in a great man’s
birthplace brings about this horrid nemesis of the professional
showman.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><SPAN name="page50"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span>
<SPAN href="images/p50.jpg">
<ANTIMG alt="Shakespeare’s Birthplace" title= "Shakespeare’s Birthplace" src="images/p50.jpg" /></SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN name="page51"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span>If you
be a little exacting, and would keep the full freshness, the
sweetest savour of hero-worship, be content not to see the
Birthplace, and especially not that garden at the back of
it. It was not, you know it quite well, in the least like
this when John Shakespeare lived here and had his wool-store next
door, where the Birthplace Museum is now, and sometimes bought
and sold corn or carried on the trade of glover. The place
has had so many changes of fortune, the appearance of the
exterior itself has been so utterly changed and so conjecturally
restored, that the thinking man loses a good deal of
confidence. And the interior: the rooms without furniture
or sign of habitation are like a body whence the soul has
fled.</p>
<p>The building did not, for one thing, stand alone as it does
now, the houses on either side having been pulled down after it
was purchased in 1848; with the, of course, entirely admirable
idea of the better lessening its risk from fire. The
effect, and that of the hedges with their hairpin railings, is to
give the place the very superior appearance of a private
house. If old John Shakespeare could be summoned back and
taken for a walk along Henley Street, he would be surprised at
many things, but by none more than by the odd disappearance of
every man’s midden and the altered appearance of his own
house. He would wonder what had become of his shop, and
assume no doubt that the occupier had made his fortune and
retired into private life. He would <SPAN name="page52"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span>not know that
it is still a place of business, and among the best-paying ones
in Stratford, too.</p>
<p>William Shakespeare succeeded to the property of his father,
and in his turn willed this Henley Street dwelling-house to his
sister, Joan Hart, for life. She had become a widow a few
days only before his death, but herself survived until
1646. The woolshop—now the Museum part—he left
to his daughter Susanna, who on the death of her aunt came into
possession of all the building. At her decease, being the
last descendant of her father, she willed it to Thomas Hart, the
grandson of her aunt, Joan Hart. From him it descended to
his brother George, who in his own lifetime gave it to his son,
Shakespeare Hart, whose widow passed it on to another George
Hart, nephew of her late husband. In 1778 George was
gathered to his fathers and Thomas, his son, reigned in his
stead; in 1793 leaving what had been the woolshop to his son John
and the Birthplace to his son Thomas, who three years later made
over his share to his brother John. On the death of this
person in 1800 the property passed to his wife for the remainder
of her life, and then to his three children, as
co-partners. Since early in the eighteenth century it had
been mortgaged up to the hilt, and the three partners were
practically obliged to sell in 1806. Thus the last remote
link with Shakespeare’s kin was severed. Thomas
Court, the purchaser, died in 1818, and on the death of his wife
in 1847 the house was purchased by public subscription, on behalf
of the nation. This transaction was completed in the
following year, at a cost of £3000, the purchase being in
1866 handed over to the Corporation of Stratford-on-Avon, who
held it in trust until the incorporation of the Shakespeare
Birthplace Trust in 1891.</p>
<p>In all this time the structure suffered many changes, the
former woolshop being opened as an inn, the <SPAN name="page53"></SPAN><span class="pagenum">p.
53</span>“Maidenhead,” even in Shakespeare’s
own time, 1603. Later it became the “Swan and
Maidenhead,” and had its front new-faced with brick in
1808. Meanwhile, the Birthplace had in 1784 become a
butcher’s shop, hanging out the sign board “The
immortal Shakespeare was born in this house.” In the
course of these changes the dormer windows had disappeared, about
1800, and the whole was in a very dilapidated state. The
restoration work of 1857–58, renewing the vanished dormers
in the roof, pulling down the brick front and reinstating a
timber-framed elevation, and generally placing the building again
in a weather-proof condition, cost nearly a further
£3000.</p>
<p>Photographs scarcely give a correct impression of the exterior
as thus restored. They reproduce the form, but not the true
tone and quality of the timber and plaster, and in truth they
make the house look better than it is. The quality of the
exterior materials is not convincing and makes the house look
very unauthentically new. The timbers and the plaster may
be even better than they were in John Shakespeare’s time,
but we do not wish them to be, and there is a spruceness and a
kind of parlourmaidenly neatness about the place which we feel
quite sure the man who was fined for having a muck-heap in front
of his house, and for not keeping his gutter clean never
knew. Painted woodwork, mathematically true, and the kind
of plaster facing we see here were unknown in the fifteenth and
sixteenth centuries. Roughly split oak formed both interior
and exterior framing to John Shakespeare’s house, and the
houses of his neighbours, and it was only in Victorian times that
the neatness and the soullessness expressed here became the
obsession of craftsmen. In short, they do these things much
more convincingly to-day at Earl’s Court.</p>
<p>Mr. Andrew Carnegie, who is a very much greater <SPAN name="page54"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span>person than
Columbus and discovered America in the monetary sense, while
Columbus only added to his geographical knowledge and not to his
wealth, has also discovered Stratford-on-Avon, and has generously
given the town a public library and the Trustees of the
Birthplace two old cottages, all in Henley Street. At the
offices you purchase tickets for the Birthplace and the
Birthplace Museum, and may well, before doing so, look into that
public library, formed out of one of those ancient timber-framed
houses Stratford is fortunate enough to possess in
profusion. It is a charmingly remodelled building, very
well worth inspection.</p>
<p style="text-align: center">
<SPAN href="images/p54.jpg">
<ANTIMG alt="The Kitchen, Shakespeare’s Birthplace" title= "The Kitchen, Shakespeare’s Birthplace" src="images/p54.jpg" /></SPAN></p>
<p>But let us to the Birthplace. At the door we are met by
a caretaker. If it be late in the day he will be a little,
or possibly very, husky. In any case he is hurried.
He hastens us into a stone-floored room in <SPAN name="page55"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span>which a
multitude of people are already waiting. They look as if
they were attending an inquest, or, at the best of it, a seance,
and expected every moment to be called upon to view the body, or
to hear knockings or see ghostly shapes. He shuts the
door. It is a solemn moment, and in the passing of it we do
actually hear knockings, loud and impatient—but they are
not spirits from the vasty deep: only other and impatient
visitors who have paid their sixpences. But they must
wait.</p>
<p>“This is the house where Shakespeare was born. You
will be shown presently the actual room where he was born,
upstairs.”</p>
<p>“It became a butcher’s shop afterwards,
didn’t it?” asks some one. The showman looks
grieved: the interruption throws him out of gear, like a bent
penny in a slot machine. Besides, it isn’t in the
programme. “You must excuse me, sir, and not keep
people waiting. This was the living room. The chimney
corner remains exactly as it was when Shakespeare was a
boy. Have you tickets for the Museum? Those who have
will go through that door to the right. This room at the
back is the kitchen. If you will ascend the staircase, you
will be shown the birth-room. Mind the step.”</p>
<p>A dark steep climb, and a narrow passage leads into the former
front bedroom. It is almost entirely bare, only an old
chair or two and an old coffer emphasising its nakedness.
The rough plaster walls and the ceiling are appallingly dirty;
Mrs. Shakespeare would be thoroughly ashamed of it, if she could
but revisit her home. A plaster cast of the inevitable
Shakespeare bust stands in the room, sometimes on the coffer, and
sometimes on a spindly-legged table, and looks with serene
amusement upon the proceedings. The old person who used to
show the birth-room has apparently been superseded. She
used to patronise the bust, and afforded some people <SPAN name="page56"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span>much secret
amusement. “Plenty room ’ere for the mighty
brain,” she would say, drawing her hand across that broad
and lofty brow; “there will never be more than one
Shakespeare, sir.”</p>
<p style="text-align: center">
<SPAN href="images/p56.jpg">
<ANTIMG alt="The Room in which Shakespeare was born" title= "The Room in which Shakespeare was born" src="images/p56.jpg" /></SPAN></p>
<p>The present attendants have less time for that kind of thing,
and hurry on with their mechanical tale. Why don’t
the Trustees economise, and get a gramophone? “This
is the room where Shakespeare was born. The furniture you
see does not belong to his time. Some of the glass in the
window is original; you can tell it by the green tint. Them
laths, sir, in the ceiling? They’re iron, and put up
to preserve the original ceiling. No one is allowed in the
room above. The ceiling and the walls, as you will observe,
are covered with names. Before visitors’ books were
provided, visitors were invited to write their names here.
You will see that they have fully availed themselves of the
privilege, and those who had diamond <SPAN name="page57"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span>rings have scratched theirs on the
window-panes. Here you will see the signature of General
Tom Thumb, who visited the Birthplace with his wife. His
name was Stratton. Its position, not very much higher than
the skirting-board, shows his height. Helen Faucit’s
name appears on the beam overhead. Sir Walter Scott’s
name, and Thomas Carlyle’s will be seen on the
window.”</p>
<p>We take these and all other signatures on trust, for they are
nearly every one terrible scrawls, and are all so extremely
crowded together, and the plaster is so dirty, and the glass so
nearly opaque that with this and with that they are hardly ever
legible.</p>
<p>In a back room hangs an oil portrait of Shakespeare: the
so-called “Stratford” portrait, bought in 1860 by
William Hunt, the town clerk, together with the old house in
which it then hung. It has been cleaned and restored and
elaborately framed, and it will be observed that it is further
guarded by being enclosed in a steel safe: extraordinary
precautions in behalf of a work which is almost certainly
spurious.</p>
<p>And so we descend and sign the visitors’ book. A
very bulky volume is filled in less than a year, and still the
number grows. There were 27,038 visitors in 1896, and
49,117 in 1910. The extremely fine and lengthy summer of
1911 did not, as might have been supposed, bring a record
return. On the contrary, the numbers fell in that year to
40,300.</p>
<p>Returning to the kitchen, where in the yawning chimney-place a
bacon cupboard will be noticed, we leave by the garden at the
back. But meanwhile the Birthplace Museum has been left
undescribed. Visitors who have sprung a sixpence for that
are taken through from the front room, the living-room.
Here are kept many and various articles more or less associated
with Shakespeare, and some that have no connection with <SPAN name="page58"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span>him at
all. The most interesting are the documents relating to
this house; the original letter written by Richard Quincy to
Shakespeare in 1598; and a deed with the signature of
Shakespeare’s brother Gilbert, who was a draper or
haberdasher in London, dated 1609. A desk from the Grammar
School, the chair from the “Falcon” at Bidford, in
which Shakespeare is supposed to have sat, portraits, prints; a
perfect copy of the 1623 First Folio edition of the plays,
purchased at the Ashburnham Sale in 1898, and other rare
editions, make up the collection, together with a sword said to
have been Shakespeare’s, and an interesting gold
signet-ring, with the initials “W. S.” entwined with
a true-lover’s knot, found in a field outside the town,
near the church, early in the nineteenth century. It is
said to have been Shakespeare’s ring, but scarcely
sufficient stress seems to be laid upon the undoubted
authenticity of it. Shakespeare’s will, drafted in
January 1616, originally bore the concluding words: “In
witness whereof I have hereunto put my seale,” but this was
afterwards altered to “hand,” the assumption being
that it was the loss of this signet ring which necessitated the
alteration.</p>
<p style="text-align: center">
<SPAN href="images/p58.jpg">
<ANTIMG alt="Shakespeare’s Signet-Ring" title= "Shakespeare’s Signet-Ring" src="images/p58.jpg" /></SPAN></p>
<p>Haydon, the painter, wrote to Keats in 1818, about the
discovery, “My dear Keats, I shall go mad! In a field
at Stratford-on-Avon, that belonged to Shakespeare, they have
found a gold ring and seal with the initials ‘W.S.,’
and a true-lover’s knot between. If this is not
Shakespeare’s whose is it? I saw an impression
to-day, and am to have one as soon as possible: as sure as you
live and breathe, and that he was the first of beings, the seal
belonged to him, O, Lord!”</p>
<p><SPAN name="page59"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span>Among
the exhibits in the Museum are the town weights and measures, the
sword of state, and altogether some fine miscellaneous feeding
for the curio-fancier.</p>
<p>The cellars under the building are not shown, nor is the
western part of it, where the town archives are stored.</p>
<p>The garden at the back is laid out in beds planted with the
flowers mentioned by Shakespeare in his works, and in the middle
of the well-kept gravelled path is the base of the ancient town
cross which formerly stood at the intersection of Bridge Street
and High Street. It is a pleasant place, and its present
condition is the result of care, the outcome of much pious
thought. But we may declare with all the emphatic language
at our command, that when William Shakespeare and his brothers
Gilbert, Richard and Edmund, and his sister Joan played out here
in the back yard, it was very little of a garden, and not at all
tidy unless they were angel-children, which we have no occasion
to suppose. It seems to have been originally an orchard,
but no doubt Mr. John Shakespeare put it to some use in
connection with the several trades he followed.</p>
<p>The piety is undoubted, but it is a little overdone, and
everything is in sample. They are not very good specimens
of marigolds we see here, but still they are obviously marigolds,
and we do not—no really we don’t—need the label
that identifies them and the other flowers. We can quite
easily recognise the winking Mary-bud, that beautiful flower
whose golden eyes are among the loveliest blossoms in an
old-fashioned garden; we know the rose, the jasmine, the
gillyflower, the sunflower, the stock, the ladysmock, and the
whole delightful posy, and wonder who and what those folk may be
who cannot recognise them, and require these cast-iron labels for
their information.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />