<p><SPAN name="link2HCH0004" id="link2HCH0004"></SPAN></p>
<br/>
<h2> CHAPTER IV. LARVAL DIMORPHISM </h2>
<p>If the reader has paid any attention to the story of the Anthrax, he must
have perceived that my narrative is incomplete. The fox in the fable saw
how the lion's visitors entered his den, but did not see how they went
out. With us, it is the converse: we know the way out of the mason bee's
fortress, but we do not know the way in. To leave the cell of which he has
eaten the owner, the Anthrax becomes a perforating machine, a living tool
from which our own industry might take a hint if it required new drills
for boring rocks. When the exit tunnel is opened, this tool splits like a
pod bursting in the sun; and from the stout framework there escapes a
dainty fly, a velvety flake, a soft fluff that astounds us by its contrast
with the roughness of the depths whence it ascends. On this point, we know
pretty well what there is to know. There remains the entrance into the
cell, a puzzle that has kept me on the alert for a quarter of a century.</p>
<p>To begin with, it is evident that the mother cannot lodge her egg in the
cell of the mason bee, which has been long closed and barricaded with a
cement wall by the time that the Anthrax makes her appearance. To
penetrate it, she would have to become an excavating tool once more and
resume the cast-off rags which she left behind in the exit window; she
would have to retrace her steps, to be reborn a pupa; and life knows none
of these retrogressions. The full grown insect, if endowed with claws,
mandibles and plenty of perseverance, might at a pinch force the mortar
casket; but the fly is not so endowed. Her slender legs would be strained
and deformed by merely sweeping away a little dust; her mouth is a sucker
for gathering the sugary exudations of the flowers and not the solid
pincers needed for the crumbling of cement. There is no auger either, no
bore copied from that of the Leucospis, no implement of any kind that can
work its way into the thickness of the wall and dispatch the egg to its
destination. In short, the mother is absolutely incapable of settling her
eggs in the chamber of the Mason bee.</p>
<p>Can it be the grub that makes its own way into the storeroom, that same
grub which we have seen draining the Chalicodoma with its leech-like
kisses? Let us call the creature to mind: a little oily sausage, which
stretches and curls up just where it lies, without being able to shift its
position. Its body is a smooth cylinder; its mouth simply a circular lip.
Not one ambulatory organ does it possess; not even hairs, protuberances or
wrinkles to enable it to crawl. The animal is made for digestion and
immobility. Its organization is incompatible with movement; everything
tells us so in the clearest fashion. No, this grub is even less able than
the mother to make its way unaided into the mason's dwelling. And yet the
provisions are there; those provisions must be reached: it is a matter of
life or death; to be or not to be. Then how does the fly set about it? It
would be vain for me to question probabilities, too often illusory; to
obtain a reply of any value, I have but one resource; I must attempt the
nearly impossible and watch the Anthrax from the egg onwards.</p>
<p>Although Anthrax flies are fairly common, in the sense of there being
several different species, they are not plentiful when it is a case of
wanting a colony populous enough to admit of continuous observation. I see
them, now here, now there, in the fiercely sun-scorched places, flitting
hither and thither on the old walls, the slopes and the sand, sometimes in
small platoons, most often singly. I can expect nothing of those
vagabonds, who are here today and gone tomorrow, for I know nothing of
their settlements. To keep a watch on them, one by one, in the blazing
heat, is very painful and very unfruitful, as the swift-winged insect has
a habit of disappearing one knows not whither just when a prospect of
capturing its secret begins to offer. I have wasted many a patient hour at
this pursuit, without the least result.</p>
<p>There might be some chance of success with Anthrax flies whose home was
known to us beforehand, especially if insects of the same species formed a
pretty numerous colony. The inquiries begun with one would be continued
with a second and with more, until a complete verdict was forthcoming.
Now, in the course of my long entomological career, I have met with but
two species of Anthrax that fulfilled this condition and were to be found
regularly: one at Carpentras; the other at Serignan. The first, Anthrax
sinuata, FALLEN, lives in the cocoons of Osmia tricornis, who herself
builds her nest in the old galleries of the hairy-footed Anthophora; the
second, Anthrax trifasciata, MEIGEN, exploits the Chalicodoma of the
Sheds. I will consult both.</p>
<p>Once more, here am I, somewhat late in life, at Carpentras, whose rude
Gallic name sets the fool smiling and the scholar thinking. Dear little
town where I spent my twentieth year and left the first bits of my fleece
upon life's bushes, my visit of today is a pilgrimage; I have come to lay
my eyes once more upon the place which saw the birth of the liveliest
impressions of my early days. I bow, in passing, to the old college where
I tried my prentice hand as a teacher. Its appearance is unchanged; it
still looks like a penitentiary. Those were the views of our mediaeval
educational system. To the gaiety and activity of boyhood, which were
considered unwholesome, it applied the remedy of narrowness, melancholy
and gloom. Its houses of instruction were, above all, houses of
correction. The freshness of Virgil was interpreted in the stifling
atmosphere of a prison. I catch a glimpse of a yard between four high
walls, a sort of bear pit, where the scholars fought for room for their
games under the spreading branches of a plane tree. All around were cells
that looked like horse boxes, without light or air; those were the
classrooms. I speak in the past tense, for doubtless the present day has
seen the last of this academic destitution.</p>
<p>Here is the tobacco shop where, on Wednesday evening, coming out of the
college, I would buy on credit the wherewithal to fill my pipe and thus to
celebrate on the eve the joys of the morrow, that blessed Thursday [the
weekly half-holiday in French schools] which I considered so well employed
in solving hard equations, experimenting with new chemical reagents,
collecting and identifying my plants. I would make my timid request,
pretending to have come out without my money, for it is hard for a
self-respecting man to admit that he is penniless. My candor appears to
have inspired some little confidence; and I obtained credit, an
unprecedented thing, with the representative of the revenue. [The
government in France has the sole control of the tobacco trade, which
forms an important branch of the inland revenue.] Ah, why did not I open a
shop and expose for sale some packets of candles, a dozen dried cod, a
barrel of sardines and a few cakes of soap! I am no more of a fool nor any
less industrious than another; and I should have made my way. But, as it
was, what could I expect? As an accoucheur of brains, a molder of
intellects, I had no claim even to bread and cheese.</p>
<p>Here is my former habitation, occupied since by droning monks. In the
embrasure of that window, sheltered from profane hands, between the closed
outer shutters and the panes, I used to keep my chemicals, bought for a
few sous cheated out of the weekly budget in the early days of our
housekeeping. The bowl of a pipe was my crucible, a sweet jar my retort,
mustard pots my receptacles for oxides and sulfides. My experiments,
harmless or dangerous, were made on a corner of the fire beside the
simmering broth.</p>
<p>How I should love to see that room again where I pored over differentials
and integrals, where I calmed my poor burning head by gazing at Mont
Ventoux, whose summit held in store for my coming expedition' those
denizens of arctic climes, the saxifrage and the poppy! And to see my
familiar friend, the blackboard which I hired at five francs a year from a
crusty joiner, that board whose value I paid many times over, though I.
could never buy it outright, for want of the necessary cash! The conic
sections which I described on that blackboard, the learned hieroglyphics!</p>
<p>Though all my efforts, which were the more deserving because I had to work
alone, led to almost nothing in that congenial calling, I would begin it
all over again if I could. I should love to be conversing for the first
time with Leibnitz and Newton, with Laplace and Lagrange, with Cuvier and
Jussieu, even if I had afterwards to solve that other arduous problem: how
to procure one's daily bread. Ah, young men, my successors, what an easy
time you have of it today! If you don't know it, then let me tell you so
by means of these few pages from the life of one of your elders.</p>
<p>But let us not forget our insects, while listening to the echoes of
illusions and difficulties roused in my memories by the cupboard window
and the hired blackboard. Let us go back to the sunken roads of the Legue,
which have become classic, so they say, since the appearance of my notes
on the Oil beetles. Ye illustrious ravines, with your sun-baked slopes, if
I have contributed a little to your fame, you, in your turn, have given me
many fair hours of forgetfulness in the happiness of learning. You, at
least, did not lure me with vain hopes; all that you promised you gave me
and often a hundredfold. You are my promised land, where I would have
sought at the last to pitch my observer's tent. My wish was not to be
realized. Let me, at least, in passing, greet my beloved animals of the
old days.</p>
<p>I raise my hat to Cerceris tuberculata, whom I see engaged on that slant,
storing her Cleonus [a large species of weevil]. As I saw her then, so I
see her now: the same staggering attempts to hoist the prey to the mouth
of the burrow; the same brawls between males watching in the brushwood of
the kermes oak. The sight of them sends a younger blood coursing through
my veins; I receive as it were the breath of a new springtime of life.
Time presses; let us pass on.</p>
<p>Another bow on this side. I hear buzzing up above, on that ledge, a colony
of Sphex wasps, stabbing their crickets. We will give them a friendly
glance, but no more. My acquaintances here are too numerous; I have not
the leisure to renew my former relations with all of them. Without
stopping, a wave of the hat to the Philanthi [bee-hunting wasps] who send
the long avalanches of rubbish streaming down from their nests; and to
Stizus ruficornis, [a hunting wasp] who stacks her praying mantises
between two flakes of sandstone; and to the silky Ammophila [a digger
wasp] with the red legs, who collects an underground store of loopers
[also known as measuring worms, the larvae or caterpillars of the
geometrid moth] and to the Tachtyti [hunting wasps], devourers of locusts;
and to the Eumenes, builders of clay cupolas on a bough.</p>
<p>Here we are at last. This high, perpendicular rock, facing the south to a
length of some hundreds of yards and riddled with holes like a monstrous
sponge, is the time-honored dwelling place of the hairy-footed Anthophora
and of her rent free tenant, the three-horned Osmia. Here also swarm their
exterminators: the Sitaris beetle, the parasite of the Anthophora; the
Anthrax fly, the murderer of the Osmia. Ill informed as to the proper
period, I have come rather late, on the 10th of September. I should have
been here a month ago, or even by the end of July, to watch the fly's
operations. My journey threatens to be fruitless: I see but a few rare
Anthrax flies, hovering round the face of the cliff. We will not despair,
however, and we will begin by consulting the locality.</p>
<p>The Anthophora's cells contain this bee in the larval stage. Some of them
provide me with the oil beetle and the Sitaris, rare finds at one time,
today of no use to me. Others contain the Melecta [a parasitic bee] in the
form of a highly colored pupa, or even in that of the full grown insect.
The Osmia, still more precocious, though dating from the same period,
shows herself exclusively in the adult form, a bad omen for my
investigations, for what the Anthrax demands is the larva and not the
perfect insect. The fly's grub doubles my apprehensions. Its development
is complete, the larva on which it feeds is consumed, perhaps several
weeks ago. I no longer doubt but that I have come too late to see what
happens in the Osmia's cocoons.</p>
<p>Is the game lost? Not yet. My notes contain evidence of Anthrax flies
hatching in the latter half of September. Besides, those whom I now see
exploring the rock are not there to take exercise: their preoccupation is
the settling of the family. These belated ones cannot tackle the Osmia,
who, with her firm, adult flesh, would not suit the nursling's delicate
needs and who, moreover, powerful as she is, would offer resistance. But
in autumn a less numerous colony of honey gatherers takes the place, upon
the slope, of the spring colony, from which it differs in species. In
particular, I see the Diadem Anthidium [a clothier bee who lines her nest
with wool and cotton] at work, entering her galleries at one time with her
harvest of pollen dust and at another with her little bale of cotton.
Might not these autumnal Bees be themselves exploited by the Anthrax, the
same that selected the Osmia as her victim a couple of months earlier?
This would explain the presence of the Anthrax flies whom I now see
fussing about.</p>
<p>A little reassured by this conjecture, I take my stand at the foot of the
rock, under a broiling sun; and, for half a day, I follow the evolutions
of my flies. They flit quietly in front of the slope, at a few inches from
the earthy covering. They go from one orifice to the next, but without
even penetrating. For that matter, their big wings, extended crosswise
even when at rest, would resist their entrance into a gallery, which is
too narrow to admit those spreading sails. And so they explore the cliff,
going to and fro and up and down, with a flight that is now sudden, now
smooth and slow. From time to time, I see the Anthrax quickly approach the
wall and lower her abdomen as though to touch the earth with the end of
her ovipositor. This proceeding takes no longer than the twinkling of an
eye. When it is done, the insect alights elsewhere and rests. Then it
resumes its sober flight, its long investigations and its sudden blows
with the tip of its belly against the layer of earth. The Bombylii [bee
flies] observe similar tactics when soaring at a short height above the
ground.</p>
<p>I at once rushed to the spot touched, lens in hand, in the hope of finding
the egg which everything told me was laid during that tap of the abdomen.
I could distinguish nothing, in spite of the closest attention. It is true
that my exhaustion, together with the blinding light and scorching heat,
made examination very difficult. Afterwards, when I made the acquaintance
of the tiny thing that issues from that egg, my failure no longer
surprised me. In the leisure of my study, with my eyes rested and with my
most powerful glasses held in a hand no longer shaking with excitement and
fatigue, I have the very greatest difficulty in finding the infinitesimal
creature, though I know exactly where it lies. Then how could I see the
egg, worn out as I was under the sun-baked cliff, how discover the precise
spot of a laying performed in a moment by an insect seen only at a
distance? In the painful conditions wherein I found myself, failure was
inevitable.</p>
<p>Despite my negative attempts, therefore, I remain convinced that the
Anthrax flies strew their eggs one by one, on the spots frequented by
those bees who suit their grubs. Each of their sudden strokes with the tip
of the abdomen represents a laying. They take no precaution to place the
germ under cover; for that matter, any such precaution would be rendered
impossible by the mother's structure. The egg, that delicate object, is
laid roughly in the blazing sun, between grains of sand, in some wrinkle
of the calcined chalk. That summary installation is sufficient, provided
the coveted larva be near at hand. It is for the young grub now to manage
as best it can at its own risk and peril.</p>
<p>Though the sunken roads of the Legue did not tell me all that I wished to
know, they at least made it very probable that the coming grub must reach
the victualled cell by its own efforts. But the grub which we know, the
one that drains the bag of fat which may be a Chalicodoma larva or an
Osmia larva, cannot move from its place, still less indulge in journeys of
discovery through the thickness of a wall and the web of a cocoon. So an
imperative necessity presents itself: there must perforce be an initial
larva form, capable of moving and organized for searching, a form under
which the grub would attain its end. The Anthrax would thus possess two
larval states: one to penetrate to the provisions; the other to consume
them. I allow myself to be convinced by the logic of it all; I already see
in my mind's eye the wee animal coming out of the egg, endowed with
sufficient power of motion not to dread a walk and with sufficient
slenderness to glide into the smallest crevices. Once in the presence of
the larva on which it is to feed, it doffs its travelling dress and
becomes the obese animal whose one duty it is to grow big and fat in
immobility. This is all very coherent; it is all deduced like a
geometrical proposition. But to the wings of imagination, however smooth
their flight, we must prefer the sandals of observed facts, the slow
sandals with the leaden soles. Thus shod, I proceed.</p>
<p>Next year, I resume my investigations, this time on the Anthrax of the
Chalicodoma, who is my neighbor in the surrounding wastelands and will
allow me to repeat my visits daily, morning and evening if need be. Taught
by my earlier studies, I now know the exact period of the Bee's hatching
and therefore of the Anthrax' laying, which must take place soon after.
Anthrax trifasciata settles her family in July, or in August at latest.
Every morning, at nine o'clock, when the heat begins to be unendurable and
when, to use [the author's gardener and factotum] Favier's expression, an
extra log is flung on the bonfire of the sun, I take the field, prepared
to come back with my head aching from the glare, provided that I bring
home the solution of my puzzle. A man must have the devil in him to leave
the shade at this time of the year. And what for, pray? To write the story
of a fly! The greater the heat, the better my chance of success. What
causes me to suffer torture fills the insect with delight; what prostrates
me braces the fly. Come along!</p>
<p>The road shimmers like a sheet of molten steel. From the dusty and
melancholy olive trees rises a mighty, throbbing hum, a great andante
whose executants have the whole sweep of woods for their orchestra. 'Tis
the concert of the Cicada, whose bellies sway and rustle with increasing
frenzy as the temperature rises. The strident scrapings of the Cicada of
the Ash, the Carcan of the district, lend their rhythm to the one note
symphony of the common cicada. This is the moment: come along! And, for
five or six weeks, oftenest in the morning, sometimes in the afternoon, I
set myself to explore the flinty plateau.</p>
<p>The Chalicodoma's nests abound, but I cannot see a single Anthrax make a
black speck upon their surface. Not one, busy with her laying, settles in
front of me. At most, from time to time, I can just see one passing far
away, with an impetuous rush. I lose her in the distance; and that is all.
It is impossible to be present at the laying of the egg. I know the little
that I learnt from the cliffs in the Legue and nothing more.</p>
<p>As soon as I recognize the difficulty, I hasten to enlist assistants.
Shepherds—mere small boys—keep the sheep in these stony
meadows, where the flocks graze, to the greater glory of our local mutton,
on the camphor saturated badafo, that is to say, spike lavender. I explain
as well as I can the object of my search; I talk to them of a big black
Fly and the nests on which she ought to settle, the clay nests so well
known to those who have learnt how to extract the honey with a straw in
springtime and spread it on a crust of bread. They are to watch that fly
and take good note of the nests on which they may see her alight; and, on
the same evening, when they bring their flocks back to the village, they
are to tell me the result of their day's work. On receiving their
favorable report, I will go with them, next day, to continue the
observations. They shall be paid for their trouble, of course. These
latter day Corydons have not the manners of antiquity: they reck little of
the seven holed flute cemented with wax, or of the beechen bowl,
preferring the coppers that will take them to the village inn on Sunday. A
reward in ready money is promised for each nest that fulfils the desired
conditions; and the bargain is enthusiastically accepted.</p>
<p>There are three of them; and I make a fourth. Shall we manage it, among us
all? I thought so. By the end of August, however, my last illusions were
dispelled. Not one of us had succeeded in seeing the big black Fly
perching on the dome of the mason bee.</p>
<p>Our failure, it seems to me, can be explained thus: outside the spacious
front of the Anthophora's settlement, the Anthrax is in permanent
residence. She visits, on the wing, every nook and corner, without moving
away from the native cliff, because it would be useless to go farther.
There is board and lodging here, indefinitely, for all her family. When
some spot is deemed favorable, she hovers round inspecting it, then comes
up suddenly and strikes it with the tip of her abdomen. The thing is done,
the egg is laid. So I picture it, at least. Within a radius of a few yards
and in a flight broken by short intervals of rest in the sun, she carries
on her search of likely places for the laying and dissemination of her
eggs. The insect's assiduous attendance upon the same slope is caused by
the inexhaustible wealth of the locality exploited.</p>
<p>The Anthrax of the Chalicodoma labors under very different conditions.
Stay-at-home habits would be detrimental to her. With her rushing flight,
made easy by the long and powerful spread of her wings, she must travel
far and wide if she would found a colony. The bee's nests are not
discovered in groups, but occur singly on their pebbles, scattered more or
less everywhere over acres of ground. To find a single one is not enough
for the fly: on account of the many parasites, not all the cells, by a
long way, contain the desired larva; others, too well protected, would not
allow of access to the provisions. Very many nests are necessary, perhaps,
for the eggs of one alone; and the finding of them calls for long
journeys.</p>
<p>I therefore picture the Anthrax coming and going in every direction across
the stony plain. Her practiced eye requires no slackened flight to
distinguish the earthen dome which she is seeking. Having found it, she
inspects it from above, still on the wing; she taps it once and yet once
again with the tip of her ovipositor and forthwith makes off, without
having set foot on the ground. Should she take a rest, it will be
elsewhere, no matter where, on the soil, on a stone, on a tuft of lavender
or thyme. Given these habits—and my observations in the Carpentras
roads make them seem exceedingly probable—it is small wonder that
the perspicacity of my young shepherds and myself should have come to
naught. I was expecting the impossible: the Anthrax does not halt on the
mason bee's nest to proceed with her laying in a methodical fashion; she
merely pays a flying visit.</p>
<p>And so I develop my theory of a primary larval form, differing in every
way from the one which I know. The organization of the Anthrax must be
such, at the beginning, as to permit of its moving on the surface of the
dome where the egg has been dropped so carelessly; the nascent grub must
be supplied with tools to pierce the concrete wall and enter the Bee's
cell through some cranny. The fly grub, perhaps dragging the remnants of
the egg behind it, must set out in quest of board and lodging almost as
soon as it is born. It will succeed under the guidance of instinct, that
faculty which waits not to number the days and which is as far seeing at
the moment of hatching as after the trials of a busy life. This primary
grub does not seem to me outside the limits of possibility; I see it, if
not in the body, at least in its actions, as plainly as though it were
really under the lens. It exists, if reason be not a vain and empty guide;
I must find it; I shall find it. Never in the history of my investigations
has the logic of things been more insistent; never has it directed me with
greater certainty towards a magnificent biological theory.</p>
<p>While vainly trying to witness the laying of the eggs, I inquire, at the
same time, into the contents of the Mason bee's nests, in quest of the
grub just issued from the egg. My own harvest and that of my young
shepherds, whose zeal I employ in a task less difficult than the first,
procure me heaps of nests, enough to fill baskets and baskets. These are
all inspected at leisure, on my work table, with the excitement which the
certainty of an approaching fine discovery never fails to give. The
Mason's cocoons are taken from the cells, inspected without, opened and
inspected within. My lens explores their innermost recesses; speck by
speck, it explores the Chalicodoma's slumbering larva; it explores the
inner walls of the cells. Nothing, nothing, nothing! For a fortnight and
more, nests were rejected and heaped up in a corner; my study was crammed
with them. What hecatombs of unfortunate sleepers removed from their
silken bags and doomed, for the most part, to a wretched end, despite the
care which I took to put them in a place of safety, where the work of the
transformation might be pursued! Curiosity makes us cruel. I continue to
rip up cocoons. And nothing, nothing! It needed the sturdiest faith to
make me persevere. That faith I possessed; and well for me that I did.</p>
<p>On the 25th of July—the date deserves to be recorded—I saw, or
rather seemed to see, something move on the Chalicodoma's larva. Was it an
illusion born of my hopes? Was it a bit of diaphanous down stirred by my
breath? It was not an illusion, it was not a bit of down, it was really
and truly a grub. What a moment, followed by what perplexities! The thing
has nothing in common with the larva of the Anthrax, it suggests rather
some microscopic Thread worm that, by accident, has made its way through
the skin of its host and come to enjoy itself outside. I do not reckon my
discovery as of much value, because I am so greatly puzzled by the
creature's appearance. No matter: we will take a small glass tube and
place inside it the Chalicodoma grub and the mysterious thing wriggling on
the surface. Suppose it should be what I am looking for? Who knows?</p>
<p>Once warned of the probable difficulty of seeing the animalcule for which
I am hunting, I redouble my attention, so much so that, in a couple of
days, I am the owner of half a score of tiny worms similar to the one
which caused me such excitement. Each of them is lodged in a glass tube
with its Chalicodoma grub. The infinitesimal thing is so small, so
diaphanous, blends to such good purpose with its host that the least fold
of skin conceals it from my view. After watching it one day through the
lens, I sometimes fail to find it again on the morrow. I think that I have
lost it, that it has perished under the weight of the overturned larva and
returned to that nothing to which it was so closely akin. Then it moves
and I see it again. For a whole fortnight, there was no limit to my
perplexity. Was it really the original larva of the Anthrax? Yes, for I at
last saw my bantlings transform themselves into the larva previously
described and make their first start at draining their victims with
kisses. A few moments of satisfaction like those which I then enjoyed make
up for many a weary hour.</p>
<p>Let us resume the story of the wee animal, now recognized as the genuine
origin of the Anthrax. It is a tiny worm about a millimeter long and
almost as slender as a hair. It is very difficult to see because of its
transparency. When tucked away in a fold of the skin of its fostering
larva, an excessively fine skin, it remains undiscoverable to the lens.
But the feeble creature is very active: it tramps over the sides of the
rich morsel, walks all round it. It covers the ground pretty quickly,
buckling and unbuckling by turns, very much after the manner of the looper
caterpillar. Its two extremities are its chief points of support. When at
a standstill, it moves its front half in every direction, as though to
explore the space around it; when walking, it swells out, magnifies its
segments and then looks like a bit of knotted string.</p>
<p>The microscope shows us thirteen rings, including the head. This head is
small, slightly horny, as is proved by its amber color, and bristles in
front with a small number of short, stiff hairs. On each of the three
segments of the thorax there are two long hairs, fixed to the lower
surface; and there are two similar and still longer hairs at the end of
the terminal ring. These four pairs of bristles, three in front and one
behind, are the locomotory organs, to which we must add the hairy edge of
the head and also the anal button, a sustaining base which might very well
work with the aid of a certain stickiness, as happens with the primary
larva of the Sitaris [a Parasitic Beetle noted for the multiplicity of
transformations undergone by the grub]. We see, through the transparent
skin, two long air tubes running parallel to each other from the first
thoracic segment to the last abdominal segment but one. They ought to end
in two pairs of breathing holes which I have not succeeded in
distinguishing quite plainly. Those two big respiratory vessels are
characteristic of the grubs of flies. Their mouths correspond exactly with
the points at which the two sets of stigmata open in the Anthrax larva in
its second form.</p>
<p>For a fortnight, the feeble grub remains in the condition which I have
described, without growing and very probably also without nourishment.
Assiduous though my visits be, I never perceive it taking any refreshment.
Besides, what would it eat? In the cocoon invaded there is nothing but the
larva of the mason bee; and the worm cannot make use of this before
acquiring the sucker that comes with the second form. Nevertheless, this
life of abstinence is not a life of idleness. The animalcule explores its
dish, now here, now elsewhere; it runs all over it with looper strides; it
pries into the neighborhood by lifting and shaking its head.</p>
<p>I see a need for this long wait under a transitory form that requires no
feeding. The egg is laid by the mother on the surface of the nest,
somewhere near a suitable cell, I dare say, but still at a distance from
the fostering larva, which is protected by a thick rampart. It is for the
new born grub to make its own way to the provisions, not by violence and
house breaking, of which it is incapable, but by patiently slipping
through a maze of cracks, first tried, then abandoned, then tried again.
It is a very difficult task, even for this most slender worm, for the
bee's masonry is exceedingly compact. There are no chinks due to bad
building; no fissures due to the weather; nothing but an apparently
impenetrable homogeneity. I see but one weak part and that only in a few
nests: it is the line where the dome joins the surface of the stone. An
imperfect soldering between two materials of different nature, cement and
flint, may leave a breach wide enough to admit besiegers as thin as a
hair. Nevertheless, the lens is far from always finding an inlet of this
kind on the nests occupied by Anthrax flies.</p>
<p>And so I am ready to allow that the animalcule wandering in search of its
cell has the whole area of the dome at its disposal when selecting an
entrance. Where the line auger of the Leucospis can enter, is there not
room enough for the even slimmer Anthrax grub? True, the Leucospis
possesses muscular force and a hard boring tool. The Anthrax is extremely
weak and has nothing but invincible patience. It does at great length of
time what the other, furnished with superior implements, accomplishes in
three hours. This explains the fortnight spent by the Anthrax under the
initial form, the object of which is to overcome the obstacle of the
mason's wall, to pierce through the texture of the cocoon and to reach the
victuals.</p>
<p>I even believe that it takes longer. The work is so laborious and the
worker so feeble! I cannot tell how long it is since my bantlings attained
their object. Perhaps, aided by easy roads, they had reached their
fostering larvae long before the completion of their first babyhood, the
end of which they were spending before my eyes, with no apparent purpose,
in exploring their provisions. The time had not yet come for them to
change their skins and take their seats at the table. Their fellows must
still, for the most part, be wandering through the pores of the masonry;
and this was what made my search so vain at the start.</p>
<p>A few facts seem to suggest that the entrance into the cell may be delayed
for several months by the difficulty of the passages. There are a few
Anthrax grubs beside the remains of pupae not far removed from the final
metamorphosis; there are others, but very rarely, on Mason bees already in
the perfect state. These grubs are sickly and appear to be ailing; the
provisions are too solid and do not lend themselves to the delicate
suckling of the worms. Who can these laggards be but animalcules that have
roamed too long in the walls of the nest? Failing to make their entrance
at the proper time, they no longer find viands to suit them. The primary
larva of the Sitaris continues from the autumn to the following spring.
Even so the initial form of the Anthrax might well continue, not in
inactivity, but in stubborn attempts to overcome the thick bulwark.</p>
<p>My young worms, when transferred with their provisions into tubes,
remained stationary, on the average, for a couple of weeks. At last, I saw
them shrink and then rid themselves of their epidermis and become the grub
which I was so anxiously expecting as the final reply to all my doubts. It
was indeed, from the first, the grub of the Anthrax, the cream-colored
cylinder with the little button of a head, followed by a hump. Applying
its cupping glass to the mason bee, the worm, without delay, began its
meal, which lasts another fortnight. The reader knows the rest.</p>
<p>Before taking leave of the animalcule, let us devote a few lines to its
instinct. It has just awakened to life under the fierce kisses of the sun.
The bare stone is its cradle, the rough clay its welcomer, as it makes its
entrance into the world, a poor thread of scarce cohering albumen. But
safety lies within; and behold the atom of animated glair embarking on its
struggle with the flint. Obstinately, it sounds each pore; it slips in,
crawls on, retreats, begins again. The radical of the germinating seed is
no more persevering in its efforts to descend into the cool earth than is
the Anthrax grub in creeping into the lump of mortar. What inspiration
urges it towards its food at the bottom of the clod, what compass guides
it? What does it know of those depths, of what lies therein or where?
Nothing. What does the root know of the earth's fruitfulness? Again
nothing. Yet both make for the nourishing spot. Theories are put forward,
most learned theories, introducing capillary action, osmosis and cellular
imbibition, to explain why the caulicle ascends and the radical descends.
Shall physical or chemical forces explain why the animalcule digs into the
hard clay? I bow profoundly, without understanding or even trying to
understand. The question is far above, our inane means.</p>
<p>The biography of the Anthrax is now complete, save for the details
relating to the egg, as yet unknown. In the vast majority of insects
subject to metamorphoses, the hatching yields the larval form which will
remain unchanged until the nymphosis. By virtue of a remarkable variation,
revealing a new vein of observation to the entomologist, the Anthrax
flies, in the larval state, assume two successive shapes, differing
greatly one from the other, both in structure and in the part which they
are called upon to play. I will describe this double stage of the organism
by the phrase 'larval dimorphism.' The initial form, that issuing from the
egg, I will call 'the primary larva;' the second form shall be 'the
secondary larva.' Among the Anthrax flies, the function of the primary
larva is to reach the provisions, on which the mother is unable to lay her
egg. It is capable of moving and endowed with ambulatory bristles, which
allow the slim creature to glide through the smallest interstices in the
wall of a Bee's nest, to slip through the woof of the cocoon and to make
its way to the larva intended for its successor's food. When this object
is attained, its part is played. Then appears the secondary larva,
deprived of any means of progression. Relegated to the inside of the
invaded cell, as incapable of leaving it by its own efforts as it was of
entering, this one has no mission in life but that of eating. It is a
stomach that loads itself, digests and goes on adding to its reserves.
Next comes the pupa, armed for the exit even as the primary larva was
equipped for entering. When the deliverance is accomplished, the perfect
insect appears, busy with its laying. The Anthrax cycle is thus divided
into four periods, each of which corresponds with special forms and
functions. The primary larva enters the casket containing provisions; the
secondary larva consumes these provisions; the pupa brings the insect to
light by boring through the enclosing wall; the perfect insect strews its
eggs; and the cycle starts afresh.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />