<p><SPAN name="link2HCH0002" id="link2HCH0002"></SPAN></p>
<br/>
<h2> CHAPTER II. THE ANTHRAX </h2>
<p>I made the acquaintance of the Anthrax in 1855 at Carpentras, at the time
when the life history of the oil beetles was causing me to search the tall
slopes beloved of the Anthophora bees [mason bees]. Her curious pupae, so
powerfully equipped to force an outlet for the perfect insect incapable of
the least effort, those pupae armed with a multiple plowshare at the fore,
a trident at the rear and rows of harpoons on the back wherewith to rip
open the Osmia bee's cocoon and break through the hard crust of the
hillside, betokened a field that was worth cultivating. The little that I
said about her at the time brought me urgent entreaties: I was asked for a
circumstantial chapter on the strange fly. The stern necessities of life
postponed to an ever retreating future my beloved investigations, so
miserably stifled. Thirty years have passed; at last, a little leisure is
at hand; and here, in the harmas of my village, with an ardor that has in
no wise grown old, I have resumed my plans of yore, still alive like the
coal smoldering under the ashes. The Anthrax has told me her secrets,
which I in my turn am going to divulge. Would that I could address all
those who cheered me on this path, including first and foremost the
revered Master of the Landes [Leon Dufour]. But the ranks have thinned,
many have been promoted to another world and their disciple lagging behind
them can but record, in memory of those who are no more, the story of the
insect clad in deepest mourning.</p>
<p>In the course of July, let us give a few sideward knocks to the bracing
pebbles and detach the nests of the Chalicodoma of the Walls [a mason bee]
from their supports. Loosened by the shock, the dome comes off cleanly,
all in one piece. Moreover—and this is a great advantage—the
cells come into view wide open on the base of the exposed nest, for at
this point they have no other wall than the surface of the pebble. In this
way, without any scraping, which would be wearisome work for the operator
and dangerous to the inhabitants of the dome, we have all the cells before
our eyes, together with their contents, consisting of a silky,
amber-yellow cocoon, as delicate and translucent as an onion peeling. Let
us split the dainty wrapper with the scissors, chamber by chamber, nest by
nest. If fortune be at all propitious, as it always is to the persevering,
we shall end by finding that the cocoons harbor two larvae together, one
more or less faded in appearance, the other fresh and plump. We shall also
find some, no less plentiful, in which the withered larva is accompanied
by a family of little grubs wriggling uneasily around it.</p>
<p>Examination at once reveals the tragedy that is happening under the cover
of the cocoon. The flacid and faded larva is the mason bee's. A month ago,
in June, having finished its mess of honey, it wove its silken sheath for
a bedchamber wherein to take the long sleep which is the prelude to the
metamorphosis. Bulging with fat, it is a rich and defenseless morsel for
whoever is able to reach it. Then, in spite of apparently insurmountable
obstacles, the mortar wall and the tent without an opening, the
flesh-eating larvae appeared in the secret retreat and are now glutting
themselves on the sleeper. Three different species take part in the
carnage, often in the same nest, in adjoining cells. The diversity of
shapes informs us of the presence of more than one enemy; the final stage
of the creatures will tell us the names and qualities of the three
invaders.</p>
<p>Forestalling the secrets of the future for the sake of greater clearness,
I will anticipate the actual facts and come at once to the results
produced. When it is by itself on the body of the mason bee's larva, the
murderous grub belongs either to Anthrax trifasciata, MEIGEN, or to
Leucospis gigas, FAB. But, if numerous little worms, often a score and
more, swarm around the victim, then it is a Chalcidid's family which we
have before us. Each of these ravagers shall have its biography. Let us
begin with the Anthrax.</p>
<p>And first the grub, as it is after consuming its victim, when it remains
the sole occupant of the mason bee's cocoon. It is a naked worm, smooth,
legless and blind, of a creamy dead white, each segment a perfect ring,
very much curved when at rest, but with the tendency to become almost
straight when disturbed. Through the diaphanous skin, the lens
distinguishes patches of fat, which are the cause of its characteristic
coloring. When younger, as a tiny grub a few millimeters long, it is
streaked with two different kinds of stains, some white, opaque and of a
creamy tint, others translucent and of the palest amber. The former come
from adipose masses in course of formation; the second from the nourishing
fluid or from the blood which laves those masses.</p>
<p>Including the head, I count thirteen segments. In the middle of the body
these segments are well marked, being separated by a slight groove; but in
the forepart they are difficult to count. The head is small and is soft,
like the rest of the body, with no sign of any mouth parts even under the
close scrutiny of the lens. It is a white globule, the size of a tiny
pin's head and continued at the back by a pad a little larger, from which
it is separated by a scarcely appreciable crease. The whole is a sort of
nipple swelling slightly on the upper surface; and its double structure is
so difficult to perceive that at first we take it for the animal's head
alone, though it includes both the head and the prothorax, or first
segment of the thorax.</p>
<p>The mesothorax, or middle segment of the thorax, which is two or three
times larger in diameter, is flattened in front and separated from the
nipple formed by the prothorax and the head by a deep, narrow, curved
fissure. On its front surface are two pale red stigmata, or respiratory
orifices, placed pretty close together. The metathorax, or last segment of
the thorax, is a little larger still in diameter and protrudes. These
abrupt increases in circumference result in a marked hump, sloping sharply
towards the front. The nipple of which the head forms part is set at the
bottom of this hump.</p>
<p>After the metathorax, the shape becomes regular and cylindrical, while
decreasing slightly in girth in the last two or three segments. Close to
the line of separation of the last two rings, I am able to distinguish,
not without difficulty, two very small stigmata, just a little darker in
color. They belong to the last segment. In all, four respiratory orifices,
two in front and two behind, as is the rule among Flies. The length of the
full sized larva is 15 to 20 millimeters and its breadth 5 to 6.</p>
<p>Remarkable in the first place by the protuberance of its thorax and the
smallness of its head, the grub of the Anthrax acquires exceptional
interest by its manner of feeding. Let us begin by observing that,
deprived of all, even the most rudimentary walking apparatus, the animal
is absolutely incapable of shifting its position. If I disturb its rest,
it curves and straightens itself in turns by a series of contractions, it
tosses about violently where it lies, but does not manage to progress. It
fidgets and gets no farther. We shall see later the magnificent problem
raised by this inertness.</p>
<p>For the moment, a most unexpected fact claims all our attention. I refer
to the extreme readiness with which the Anthrax' larva quits and returns
to the Chalicodoma grub on which it is feeding. After witnessing flesh
eating larvae at hundreds and hundreds of meals, I suddenly find myself
confronted with a manner of eating that bears no relation to anything
which I have seen before. I feel myself in a world that baffles my old
experience. Let us recall the table manners of a larva living on prey, the
Ammophila's for instance, when devouring its caterpillar. A hole is made
in the victim's side; and the head and neck of the nursling dive deep into
the wound, to root luxuriously among the entrails. There is never a
withdrawal from the gnawed belly, never a recoil to interrupt the feast
and to take breath awhile. The vivacious animal always goes forward,
chewing, swallowing, digesting, until the caterpillar's skin is emptied of
its contents. Once seated at table, it does not budge as long as the
victuals last. To tease it with a straw is not always enough to induce it
to withdraw its head outside the wound; I have to use violence. When
removed by force and then left to its own devices, the creature hesitates
for a long time, stretches itself and mouths around, without trying to
open a passage through a new wound. It needs the attacking point that has
just been abandoned. If it finds the spot, it makes its way in and resumes
the work of eating; but its future is jeopardized from this time forward,
for the game, now perhaps tackled at inopportune points, is liable to go
bad.</p>
<p>With the Anthrax' grub, there is none of this mangling, none of this
persistent clinging to the entrance wound. I have but to tease it with the
tip of a hair pencil and forthwith it retires; and the lens reveals no
wound at the abandoned spot, no such effusion of blood as there would be
if the skin were perforated. When its sense of security is restored, the
grub once more applies its pimple head to the fostering larva, at any
point, no matter where; and, so long as my curiosity does not prevent it,
keeps itself fixed there, without the least effort, or the least
perceptible movement that could account for the adhesion. If I repeat the
touch with the pencil, I see the same sudden retreat and, soon after, the
same contact just as readily renewed.</p>
<p>This facility for gripping, quitting and regripping, now here, now there
and always without a wound, the part of the victim whence the nourishment
is drawn tells us of itself that the mouth of the Anthrax is not armed
with mandibular fangs capable of digging into the skin and tearing it. If
the flesh were gashed by any such pincers, one or two attempts would be
necessary before they could be released or reapplied; besides, each point
bitten would display a lesion. Well, there is nothing of the kind: a
conscientious examination through the magnifying glass shows conclusively
that the skin is intact; the grub glues its mouth to its prey or withdraws
it with an ease that can only be explained by a process of simple contact.
This being so, the Anthrax does not chew its food as do the other
carnivorous grubs; it does not eat, it inhales.</p>
<p>This method of taking nourishment implies an exceptional apparatus of the
mouth, into which it behooves us to inquire before continuing. My most
powerful magnifying glass at last discovers, at the center of the pimple
head, a small spot of an amber-russet color; and that is all. For a more
exhaustive examination we will employ the microscope. I cut off the
strange pimple with the scissors, wash it in a drop of water and place it
on the object slide. The mouth now stands revealed as a round spot which,
for hue and for the smallness of its size, may be compared with the front
stigmata. It is a small conical crater, with sides of a pale yellowish-red
and with faint, more or less concentric lines. At the bottom of this
funnel is the opening of the gullet, itself tinted red in front and
promptly spreading into a cone at the back. There is not the slightest
trace of mandibular fangs, of jaws, of mouth parts for seizing and
grinding. Everything is reduced to the bowl shaped opening, with a
delicate lining of horny texture, as is shown by the amber hue and the
concentric streaks. When I look for some term to designate this digestive
entrance, of which so far I know no other example, I can find only that of
a sucker or cupping glass. Its attack is a mere kiss, but what a
perfidious kiss!</p>
<p>We know the machine; now let us see the working. To facilitate
observation, I shifted the newborn Anthrax grub, together with the
Chalicodoma grub, its wet nurse, from the natal cell into a glass tube. I
was thus able, by employing as many tubes as I wanted, to follow from
start to finish, in all its most intimate details, the strange repast
which I am going to describe.</p>
<p>The worm is fixed by its sucker to any convenient part of the nurse, plump
and fat as butter. It is ready to break off its kiss suddenly, should
anything disquiet it, and to resume it as easily when tranquillity is
restored. No Lamb enjoys greater liberty with its mother's teat. After
three or four days of this contact of the nurse and nursling, the former,
at first replete and endowed with the glossy skin that is a sign of
health, begins to assume a withered aspect. Her sides fall in, her fresh
color fades, her skin becomes covered with little folds and gives evidence
of an appreciable shrinking in this breast which, instead of milk, yields
fat and blood. A week is hardly past before the progress of the exhaustion
becomes startlingly rapid. The nurse is flabby and wrinkled, as though
borne down by her own weight, like a very slack object. If I move her from
her place, she flops and sprawls like a half-filled water bottle over the
new supporting plane. But the Anthrax' kiss goes on emptying her: soon she
is but a sort of shriveled lard bag, decreasing from hour to hour, from
which the sucker draws a few last oily drains. At length, between the
twelfth and the fifteenth day, all that remains of the larva of the mason
bee is a white granule, hardly as large as a pin's head.</p>
<p>This granule is the water bottle drained to the last drop, is the nurse's
breast emptied of all its contents. I soften the meager remnant in water;
then, keeping it still immersed, I blow into it through an extremely
attenuated glass tube. The skin fills out, distends and resumes the shape
of the larva, without there being an outlet anywhere for the compressed
air. It is intact, therefore; it is free of any perforation, which would
be forthwith revealed under the water by an escape of gas. And so, under
the Anthrax' cupping glass, the oily bottle has been drained by a simple
transpiration through the membrane; the substance of the nurse grub has
been transfused into the body of the nursling by a process akin to that
known in physics as endosmosis. What should we say to a method of being
suckled by the mere application of the mouth to a teatless breast? What we
see here may be compared with that: without any outlet, the milk of the
Chalicodoma grub passes into the stomach of the Anthrax' larva.</p>
<p>Is it really an instance of endosmosis? Might it not rather be atmospheric
pressure that stimulates the flow of nourishing fluids and distils them
into the Anthrax' cup-shaped mouth, working, in order to create a vacuum,
almost like the suckers of the Cuttlefish? All this is possible, but I
shall refrain from deciding, preferring to assign a large share to the
unknown in this extraordinary method of nutrition. It ought, I think, to
provide physiologists with a field of research in which new views on the
hydrodynamics of live fluids might well be gleaned; and this field
trenches upon others that would also yield rich harvests. The brief span
of my days compels me to set the problem without seeking to solve it.</p>
<p>And the second problem is this: the Chalicodoma grub destined to feed the
Anthrax is without a wound of any kind. The mother of the tiny larva is a
feeble Fly deprived of whatsoever weapon capable of injuring her
offspring's prey. Moreover, she is absolutely powerless to penetrate the
mason bee's fortress, powerless as a fluff of down against a rock. On this
point there is no doubt: the future wet nurse of the Anthrax has not been
paralyzed as are the live provisions collected by the Hunting Wasps; she
has received no bite nor scratch nor contusion of any sort; she has
experienced nothing out of the common: in short, she is in her normal
state. The billeted nursling arrives, we shall presently see how; he
arrives, scarcely visible, almost defying the scrutiny of the lens; and,
having made his preparations, he installs himself, he, the atom, upon the
monstrous nurse, whom he is to drain to the very husk. And she, not
paralyzed by a preliminary vivisection, endowed with all her normal
vitality, lets him have his way, lets herself be sucked dry, with the
utmost apathy. Not a tremor in her outraged flesh, not a quiver of
resistance. No corpse could show greater indifference to the bite which it
receives.</p>
<p>Ah, but the maggot has chosen the hour of attack with traitorous cunning!
Had it appeared upon the scene earlier, when the larva was consuming its
store of honey, things of a surety would have gone badly with it. The
assaulted one, feeling herself bled to death by that ravenous kiss, would
have protested with much wriggling of body and grinding of mandibles. The
position would have ceased to be tenable and the intruder would have
perished. But at this hour all danger has disappeared. Enclosed in its
silken tent, the larva is seized with the lethargy that precedes the
metamorphosis. Its condition is not death, but neither is it life. It is
an intermediary condition; it is almost the latent vitality of grain or
egg. Therefore there is no sign of irritation on the larva's part under
the needle with which I stir it and still less under the sucker of the
Anthrax grub, which is able to drain the affluent breast in perfect
safety.</p>
<p>This lack of resistance, induced by the torpor of the transformation,
appears to me necessary, in view of the weakness of the nursling as it
leaves the egg, whenever the mother is herself incapable of depriving the
victim of the power of self defense. And so the nonparalyzed larvae are
attacked during the period of the nymphosis. We shall soon see other
instances of this.</p>
<p>Motionless though it be, the Chalicodoma grub is none the less alive. The
primrose tint and the glossy skin are unequivocal signs of health: Were it
really dead, it would, in less than twenty-four hours, turn a dirty brown
and, soon after, decompose into a fluid putrescence. Now here is the
marvelous thing: during the fortnight, roughly, that the Anthrax' meal
lasts, the butter color of the larva, an unfailing symptom of the presence
of life, continues unaltered and does not change into brown, the sign of
putrefaction, until hardly anything remains; and even then the brown hue
is often absent. As a rule, the look of live flesh is preserved until the
final pellet, formed of the skin, the sole residue, makes its appearance.
This pellet is white, with not a speck of tainted matter, proving that
life persists until the body is reduced to nothing.</p>
<p>We here witness the transfusion of one animal into another, the change of
Chalicodoma substance into Anthrax substance; and, as long as the
transfusion is not complete, as long as the eaten has not disappeared
altogether and become the eater, the ruined organism fights against
destruction. What manner of life is this, which may be compared with the
life of a night light whose extinction is not accomplished until the last
drop of oil has burnt away? How is any creature able to fight against the
final tragedy of corruption up to the last moment in which a nucleus of
matter remains as the seat of vital energy? The forces of the living
creature are here dissipated not through any disturbance of the
equilibrium of those forces, but for the want of any point of application
for them: the larva dies because materially there is no more of it.</p>
<p>Can we be in the presence of the diffusive life of the plant, a life which
persists in a fragment? By no means: the grub is a more delicate organic
structure. There is unity between the several parts; and none of them can
be jeopardized without involving the ruin of the others. If I myself give
the larva a wound, if I bruise it, the whole body very soon turns brown
and begins to rot. It dies and decomposes by the mere prick of a needle;
it keeps alive, or at least preserves the freshness of the live tissues,
so long as it is not entirely emptied by the Anthrax' sucker. A nothing
kills it; an atrocious wasting does not. No, I fail to understand the
problem; and I bequeath it to others.</p>
<p>All that I can see by way of a glimpse—and even then I put forward
my suspicions with extreme reserve—all that I am permitted to
surmise is reduced to this: the substance of the sleeping larva as yet has
no very definite static existence; it is like the raw materials collected
for a building; it is waiting for the elaboration that is to make a bee of
it. To mould those shapeless lumps of the future insect, the air, that
prime adjuster of living things, circulates among them, passing through a
network of ducts. To organize them, to direct the placing of them, the
nervous system, the embryo of the animal, distributes its ramifications
over them. Nerve and air duct, therefore, are the essentials; the rest is
so much material in reserve for the process of the metamorphosis. As long
as that material is not employed, as long as it has not acquired its final
equilibrium, it can grow less and less; and life, though languishing, will
continue all the same on the express condition that the respiratory organs
and the nervous filaments be respected. It is as it were the flame of the
lamp, which, whether full or empty, continues to give light so long as the
wick is soaked in oil. Nothing but fluids, the plastic materials held in
reserve, can be distilled by the Anthrax' sucker through the unpierced
skin of the grub; no part of the respiratory and nervous systems passes.
As the two essential functions remain unscathed, life goes on until
exhaustion is completed. On the other hand, if I myself injure the larva,
I disturb the nervous or air conducting filaments; and the bruised part
spreads a taint, followed by putrefaction, all over the body.</p>
<p>I have elsewhere, speaking of the Scolia [a digger wasp] devouring the
Cetonia grub, enlarged upon this refined art of eating which consists in
consuming the prey while killing it only at the last mouthfuls. The
Anthrax has the same requirements as his competitors who dine off fresh
viands. He needs meat of that day, taken from a single joint that has to
last a fortnight without going bad. His method of consuming reaches the
highest level of art: he does not cut into his prey, he sips it little by
little through his sucker. In this way, any dangerous risk is averted.
Whether he imbibe at this spot or at that, even if he abandon the sucking
process and resume it later, by no accident can he ever attack that which
it is incumbent upon him to respect lest corruption supervene. The others
have a fixed position on the victim, a place at which their mandibles have
to bite and enter. If they move away from it, if they miss the appointed
path, they imperil their existence. The Anthrax, more highly favored, puts
his mouth where it suits him; he leaves off when he pleases and when he
pleases starts again.</p>
<p>Unless I labor under a delusion, I think that I see the necessity for this
privilege. The egg of the carnivorous burrower is firmly fixed on the
victim at a point which varies considerably, it is true, according to the
nature of the prey, but which is uniform for the same species of prey;
moreover—and this is an important condition—the point of
adhesion of that egg is always the head, whereas the egg of a bee, of the
Osmia, for instance, is fixed to the mess of honey by the hinder end. When
hatched, the new born Wasp grub has not to choose for itself, at its risk
and peril, the suitable point at which to take the first cut in the quarry
without fear of killing it too quickly: all that it need do is to bite at
the spot where it has just been born. The mother, with her unfailing
instinct, has already made the dangerous choice; she has stuck her egg on
the propitious spot and, by the very act of doing so, marked out the
course for the inexperienced grub to follow. The tact of ripe age here
guides the young larva's behavior at table.</p>
<p>The conditions are very different in the Anthrax' case. The egg is not
placed upon the victuals, it is not even laid in the mason bee's cell.
This is the natural consequence of the mother's feeble frame and of her
lack of any instrument, such as a probe or auger, capable of piercing the
mortar wall. It is for the newly hatched grub to make its own way into the
dwelling. It enters, finds itself in the presence of ample provisions, the
larva of the mason bee. Free of its actions, it is at liberty to attack
the prey where it chooses; or rather the attacking point will be decided
at haphazard by the first contact of the mouth in quest of food. Grant
this mouth a set of carving tools, jaws and mandibles; in short, suppose
the grub of the Fly to possess a manner of eating similar to that of the
other carnivorous larvae; and the nursling is at once threatened with a
speedy death. He will split open his nurse's belly, he will dig without
any rule to guide him, he will bite at random, essentials as well as
accessories; and, from one day to the next, he will set up gangrene in the
violated mass, even as I myself do when I give it a wound. For the lack of
an attacking point prescribed for him at birth, he will perish on the
damaged provisions. His freedom of action will have killed him.</p>
<p>Certainly, liberty is a noble attribute, even in an insignificant grub;
but it also has its dangers everywhere. The Anthrax escapes the peril only
on the condition of being, so to speak, muzzled. His mouth is not a fierce
forceps that tears asunder; it is a sucker that exhausts but does not
wound. Thus restrained by this safety appliance, which changes the bite
into a kiss, the grub has fresh victuals until it has finished growing,
although it knows nothing of the rules of methodical consumption at a
fixed point and in a predetermined direction.</p>
<p>The considerations which I have set forth seem to me strictly logical: the
Anthrax, owing to the very fact that he is free to take his nourishment
where he pleases on the body of the fostering larva, must, for his own
protection, be made incapable of opening his victim's body. I am so
utterly convinced of this harmonious relation between the eater and the
eaten that I do not hesitate to set it up as a principle. I will therefore
say this: whenever the egg of any kind of insect is not fastened to the
larva destined for its food, the young grub, free to select the attacking
point and to change it at will, is as it were muzzled and consumes its
provisions by a sort of suction, without inflicting any appreciable wound.
This restriction is essential to the maintenance of the victuals in good
condition. My principle is already supported by examples many and various,
whose depositions are all to the same effect. The witnesses include, after
the Anthrax, the Leucospis [a parasitic insect] and his rivals, whose
evidence we shall hear presently; the Ephialtes mediator [an Ichneumon
fly], who feeds, in the dry brambles, on the larva of the Black Psen [a
digger wasp]; the Myodites, that strange, fly-shaped beetle whose grub
consumes the larva of the cockchafer. All—flies, ichneumon flies and
beetles—scrupulously spare their foster mother; they are careful not
to tear her skin, so that the vessel may keep its liquid good to the last.</p>
<p>The wholesomeness of the victuals is not the only condition imposed: I
find a second, which is no less essential. The substance of the fostering
larva must be sufficiently fluid to ooze through the unbroken skin under
the action of the sucker. Well, the necessary fluidity is realized as the
time of the metamorphosis draws near. When they wished Medea to restore
Pelias to the vigor of youth, his daughters cut the old king's body to
pieces and boiled it in a cauldron, for there can be no new existence
without a prior dissolution. We must pull down before we can rebuild; the
analysis of death is the first step towards the synthesis of life. The
substance of the grub that is to be transformed into a bee begins,
therefore, by disintegrating and dissolving into a fluid broth. The
materials of the future insect are obtained by a general recasting. Even
as the founder puts his old bronzes into the melting pot in order
afterwards to cast them in a mould whence the metal will issue in a
different shape, so life liquefies the grub, a mere digesting machine, now
thrown aside, and out of its running matter produces the perfect insect,
bee, butterfly or beetle, the final manifestation of the living creature.</p>
<p>Let us open a Chalicodoma grub under the microscope, during the period of
torpor. Its contents consists almost entirely of a liquid broth, in which
swim numberless oily globules and a fine dust of uric acid, a sort of
off-throw of the oxidized tissues. A flowing thing, shapeless and
nameless, is all that the animal is, if we add abundant ramified air
ducts, some nervous filaments and, under the skin, a thin layer of
muscular fibers. A condition of this kind accounts for a fatty
transpiration through the skin when the Anthrax' sucker is at work. At any
other time, when the larva is in the active period or else when the insect
has reached the perfect stage, the firmness of the tissues would resist
the transfusion and the suckling of the Anthrax would become a difficult
matter, or even impossible. In point of fact, I find the grub of the fly
established, in the vast majority of cases, on the sleeping larva and
sometimes, but rarely, on the pupa. Never do I see it on the vigorous
larva eating its honey; and hardly ever on the insect brought to
perfection, as we find it enclosed in its cell all through the autumn and
winter. And we can say the same of the other grub eaters that drain their
victims without wounding them: all are engaged in their death dealing work
during the period of torpor, when the tissues are fluidified. They empty
their patient, who has become a bag of running grease with a diffused
life; but not one, among those I know, reaches the Anthrax' perfection in
the art of extraction.</p>
<p>Nor can any be compared with the Anthrax as regards the means brought into
play in order to leave the cell. These others, when they become perfect
insects, have implements for sapping and demolishing, stout mandibles,
capable of digging the ground, of pulling down clay partition walls and
even of reducing the mason bee's tough cement to powder. The Anthrax, in
her final form, has nothing like this. Her mouth is a short, soft
proboscis, good at most for soberly licking the sugary exudations of the
flowers; her slim legs are so feeble that to move a grain of sand were an
excessive task for them, enough to strain every joint; her great, stiff
wings, which must remain full spread, do not allow her to slip through a
narrow passage; her delicate suit of downy velvet, from which you take the
bloom by merely breathing on it, could not withstand the rough contact of
the gallery of a mine. Unable herself to enter the Mason bee's cell to lay
her egg, she cannot leave it either, when the time comes to free herself
and appear in broad daylight in her wedding dress. The larva, on its side,
is powerless to prepare the way for the coming flight. That buttery little
cylinder, owning no tools but a sucker so flimsy that it barely arrives at
substance and so small that it is almost a geometrical point, is even
weaker than the adult insect, which at least flies and walks. The Mason
bee's cell represents to it a granite cave. How to get out? The problem
would be insoluble to those two incapables, if nothing else played its
part.</p>
<p>Among insects, the nymph, or pupa, the transition stage between the larval
and the adult form, is generally a striking picture of every weakness of a
budding organism. A sort of mummy tight bound in swaddling clothes,
motionless and impassive, it awaits the resurrection. Its tender tissues
flow in every direction; its limbs, transparent as crystal, are held fixed
in their place, along the side, lest a movement should disturb the
exquisite delicacy of the work in course of accomplishment. Even so, to
secure his recovery, is a broken boned patient held captive in the
surgeon's bandages. Absolute stillness is necessary in both cases, lest
they be crippled or even die.</p>
<p>Well, here, by a strange inversion that confuses all our views on life, a
Cyclopean task is laid upon the nymph of the Anthrax. It is the nymph that
has to toil, to strive, to exhaust itself in efforts to burst the wall and
open the way out. To the embryo falls the desperate duty, which shows no
mercy to the nascent flesh; to the adult insect the joy of resting in the
sun. This transposition of functions has as its result a well sinker's
equipment in the nymph, an eccentric, complicated equipment which nothing
suggested in the larva and which nothing recalls in the perfect insect.
The set of tools includes an assortment of plowshares, gimlets, hooks and
spears and of other implements that are not found in our trades nor named
in our dictionaries. Let us do our best to describe the strange piercing
gear.</p>
<p>In a fortnight at most, the Anthrax has consumed the Chalicodoma grub,
whereof naught remains but the skin, gathered into a white granule. By the
time that July is nearly over, it becomes rare to find any nurslings left
upon their nurses. From this period until the following May, nothing fresh
happens. The Anthrax retains its larval shape without any appreciable
change and lies motionless in the mason bee's cocoon, beside the pellet
remains. When the fine days of May arrive, the grub shrivels and casts its
skin and the nymph appears, fully clad in a stout, reddish, horny hide.</p>
<p>The head is round and large, separated from the thorax by a strangulated
furrow, crowned on top and in front with a sort of diadem of six hard,
sharp, black spikes, arranged in a semicircle whose concave side faces
downward. These spikes decrease slightly in length from the summit to the
ends of the arch. Taken together, they suggest the radial crowns which we
see the Roman emperors of the Decadence wear on the medals. This six-fold
plowshare is the chief excavating tool. Lower down, on the median line,
the instrument is finished off with a separate group of two small black
spikes, placed close together.</p>
<p>The thorax is smooth, the wing cases large, folded under the body like a
scarf and coming almost to the middle of the abdomen. This has nine
segments, of which four, starting with the second, are armed, on the back,
down the middle, with a belt of little horny arches, pale brown in color,
drawn up parallel to one another, set in the skin by their convex surfaces
and finishing at both ends with a hard, black point. Altogether, the belt
thus forms a double row of little thorns, with a hollow in between. I
count about twenty-five twin-toothed arches to one segment, which gives a
total of two hundred spikes for the four rings thus armed.</p>
<p>The use of this rasp, or grater, is obvious: it gives the nymph a purchase
on the wall of its gallery as the work proceeds. Thus anchored on a host
of points, the stern pioneer is able to hit the obstacle harder with its
diadem of awls. Moreover, to make it more difficult for the instrument to
recoil, long, stiff bristles, pointing backwards, are scattered here and
there among the climbing belts. There are some besides on the other
segments, both on the ventral and the dorsal surface. On the flanks, they
are thicker and arranged as it were in clusters.</p>
<p>The sixth segment carries a similar belt, but a much less powerful one,
consisting of a single row of unassuming thorns. The belt is weaker still
on the seventh segment; lastly, on the eighth, it is reduced to a mere
rough brown shading. Commencing with the sixth, the rings decrease in
width and the abdomen ends in a cone, the extremity of which, formed of
the ninth segment, constitutes a weapon of a new kind. It is a sheaf of
eight brown spikes. The last two exceed the others in length and stand out
from the group in a double terminal plowshare.</p>
<p>There is a round air hole in front, on either side of the thorax, and
similar stigmata on the flanks of each of the first seven abdominal
segments. When at rest, the nymph is curved into a bow. When about to act,
it suddenly unbends and straightens itself. It measures 15 to 20
millimeters long and 4 to 5 millimeters across.</p>
<p>Such is the strange perforating machine that is to prepare an outlet for
the feeble Anthrax through the Mason bee's cement. The structural details,
so difficult to explain in words, may be summed up as follows: in front,
on the forehead, a diadem of spikes, the ramming and digging tool; behind,
a many bladed plowshare which fits into a socket and allows the pupa to
slacken suddenly in readiness for an attack on the barrier which has to be
demolished; on the back, four climbing belts, or graters, which keep the
animal in position by biting on the walls of the tunnel with their
hundreds of teeth; and, all over the body, long, stiff bristles, pointing
backwards, to prevent falls or recoils.</p>
<p>A similar structure exists in the other species of Anthrax with slight
variations of detail. I will confine myself to one instance, that of
Anthrax sinuata, who thrives at the cost of Osmia tricornis. Her nymph
differs from that of Anthrax trifasciata, the Anthrax of the mason bee, in
possessing less powerful armor. Its four climbing belts consist of only
fifteen to seventeen double spiked arches, instead of twenty-five; also,
the abdominal segments, from the sixth onwards, are supplied merely with
stiff bristles, without a trace of horny spikes. If the evolution of the
various Anthrax flies were better known to us, the number of these arches
would, I believe, be of great service to entomology in the differentiation
of species. I see it remaining constant for any given species, with marked
variations between one species and another. But this is not my business: I
merely call the attention of the classifiers to this field of study and
pass on.</p>
<p>About the end of May, the coloring of the nymph, hitherto a light red,
alters greatly and forecasts the coming transformation. The head, the
thorax and the scarf formed by the wings become a handsome, shiny black. A
dark band shows on the back of the four segments with their two rows of
spikes; three spots appear on the two next rings; the anal armor becomes
darker. In this manner we foresee the black livery of the coming insect.
The time has arrived for the pupa to work at the exit gallery.</p>
<p>I was anxious to see it in action, not under natural conditions, which
would be impracticable, but in a glass tube in which I confine it between
two thick stoppers of sorghum pith. The space thus marked off is about the
same size as the natal cell. The partitions front and back, although not
so stout as the Chalicodoma's masonry, are nevertheless firm enough not to
yield except to prolonged efforts; on the other hand, the side walls are
smooth and the toothed belts will not be able to grip them: a most
unfavorable condition for the worker. No matter: in the space of a single
day, the pupa pierces the front partition, three quarters of an inch
thick. I see it fixing its double plowshare against the back partition,
arching into a bow and then suddenly releasing itself and striking the
plug in front of it with its barbed forehead. Under the impact of the
spikes, the sorghum slowly crumbles to pieces. It is slow in coming away;
but it comes away all the same, atom by atom. At long intervals, the
method changes. With its crown of awls driven into the pith, the animal
frets and fidgets, sways on the pivot of its anal armor. The work of the
auger follows that of the pickaxe. Then the blows recommence, interspersed
with periods of rest to recover from the fatigue. At last, the hole is
made. The pupa slips into it, but does not pass through entirely: the head
and thorax appear outside; the abdomen remains held in the gallery.</p>
<p>The glass cell, with its lack of supports at the side, has certainly
perplexed my subject, which does not seem to have made use of all its
methods. The hole through the sorghum is wide and irregular; it is a
clumsy breach and not a gallery. When made through the mason bee's walls,
it is cylindrical, fairly neat and exactly of the animal's diameter. So I
hope that, under natural conditions, the pupa does not give quite so many
blows with the pickaxe and prefers to work with the drill.</p>
<p>Narrowness and evenness in the exit tunnel are necessary to it. It always
remains half caught in it and even pretty securely fixed by the graters on
its back. Only the head and thorax emerge into the outer air. This is a
last precaution for the final deliverance. A fixed support is, in fact,
indispensable to the Anthrax for issuing from her horny sheath, unfurling
her great wings and extricating her slender legs from their scabbards. All
this very delicate work would be endangered by any lack of steadiness.</p>
<p>The pupa, therefore, remains fixed by the graters of its back in the
narrow exit gallery and thus supplies the stable equilibrium essential to
the new birth. All is ready. It is time now for the great act. A
transversal cleft makes its appearance on the forehead, at the bottom of
the perforating diadem; a second, but longitudinal slit divides the skull
in two and extends down the thorax. Through this cross-shaped opening, the
Anthrax suddenly appears, all moist with the humors of life's laboratory.
She steadies herself upon her trembling legs, dries her wings and takes to
flight, leaving at the window of the cell her nymphal slough, which keeps
intact for a very long period. The sand-colored fly has five or six weeks
before her, wherein to explore the clay nests amid the thyme and to take
her small share of the joys of life. In July, we shall see her once more,
busy this time with the entrance into the cell, which is even stranger
than the exit.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />