<SPAN name="CH19"><!-- CH19 --></SPAN>
<h2> CHAPTER XIX </h2>
<h3> A STRANGE SYMPOSIUM </h3>
<p>It came upon me with something of a shock of surprise
to find the scrap of paper still tacked to the oak of
Thorndyke's chambers. So much had happened since I
had last looked on it that it seemed to belong to another
epoch of my life. I removed it thoughtfully and picked
out the tack before entering, and then, closing the
inner door, but leaving the oak open, I lit the gas and
fell to pacing the room.</p>
<p>What a wonderful episode it had been! How the
whole aspect of the world had been changed in a moment
by Thorndyke's revelation! At another time,
curiosity would have led me to endeavour to trace back
the train of reasoning by which the subtle brain of my
teacher had attained this astonishing conclusion. But
now my own happiness held exclusive possession of my
thoughts. The image of Ruth filled the field of my
mental vision. I saw her again as I had seen her in
the cab with her sweet, pensive face and downcast eyes;
I felt again the touch of her soft cheek and the parting
kiss by the gate, so frank and simple, so intimate and
final.</p>
<p>I must have waited quite a long time, though the
golden minutes sped unreckoned, for when my two
colleagues arrived they tendered needless apologies.</p>
<p>"And I suppose," said Thorndyke, "you have been
wondering what I wanted you for."</p>
<p>I had not, as a matter of fact, given the matter a
moment's consideration.</p>
<p>"We are going to call on Mr. Jellicoe," Thorndyke
explained. "There is something behind this affair,
and until I have ascertained what it is, the case is not
complete from my point of view."</p>
<p>"Wouldn't it have done as well to-morrow?" I
asked.</p>
<p>"It might; and then it might not. There is an old
saying as to catching a weasel asleep. Mr. Jellicoe is
a somewhat wide-awake person, and I think it best to
introduce him to Inspector Badger at the earliest possible
moment."</p>
<p>"The meeting of a weasel and a badger suggests a
sporting interview," remarked Jervis. "But you don't
expect Jellicoe to give himself away, do you?"</p>
<p>"He can hardly do that, seeing that there is nothing
to give away. But I think he may make a statement.
There were some exceptional circumstances, I feel
sure."</p>
<p>"How long have you known that the body was in
the Museum?" I asked.</p>
<p>"About thirty or forty seconds longer than you
have, I should say."</p>
<p>"Do you mean," I exclaimed, "that you didn't
know until the negative was developed?"</p>
<p>"My dear fellow," he replied, "do you suppose that,
if I had had certain knowledge where the body was, I
should have allowed that noble girl to go on dragging
out a lingering agony of suspense that I could have cut
short in a moment? Or that I should have made these
humbugging pretences of scientific experiments if a
more dignified course had been open to me?"</p>
<p>"As to the experiments," said Jervis, "Norbury
could hardly have refused if you had taken him into
your confidence."</p>
<p>"Indeed he could, and probably would. My 'confidence'
would have involved a charge of murder against
a highly respectable gentleman who was well known to
him. He would probably have referred me to the police,
and then what could I have done? I had plenty of
suspicions, but not a single solid fact."</p>
<p>Our discussion was here interrupted by hurried footsteps
on the stairs and a thundering rat-tat on our
knocker.</p>
<p>As Jervis opened the door, Inspector Badger burst
into the room in a highly excited state.</p>
<p>"What is all this, Doctor Thorndyke?" he asked.
"I see you've sworn an information against Mr. Jellicoe,
and I have a warrant to arrest him; but before anything
is done I think it right to tell you that we have
more evidence than is generally known pointing to
quite a different quarter."</p>
<p>"Derived from Mr. Jellicoe's information," said
Thorndyke. "But the fact is that I have just examined
and identified the body at the British Museum,
where it was deposited by Mr. Jellicoe. I don't say
that he murdered John Bellingham—though that is
what the appearances suggest—but I do say that he
will have to account for his secret disposal of the
body."</p>
<p>Inspector Badger was thunderstruck. Also he was
visibly annoyed. The salt which Mr. Jellicoe had so
adroitly sprinkled on the constabulary tail appeared
to develop irritating properties, for when Thorndyke
had given him a brief outline of the facts he stuck his
hands in his pockets and exclaimed gloomily:</p>
<p>"Well, I'm hanged! And to think of all the time
and trouble I've spent on those damned bones! I suppose
they were just a plant?"</p>
<p>"Don't let us disparage them," said Thorndyke.
"They have played a useful part. They represent the
inevitable mistake that every criminal makes sooner or
later. The murderer will always do a little too much.
If he would only lie low and let well alone, the detective
might whistle for a clue. But it is time we were starting."</p>
<p>"Are we all going?" asked the inspector, looking
at me in particular with no very gracious recognition.</p>
<p>"We will all come with you," said Thorndyke; "but
you will, naturally, make the arrest in the way that
seems best to you."</p>
<p>"It's a regular procession," grumbled the inspector;
but he made no more definite objection, and we started
forth on our quest.</p>
<p>The distance from the Temple to Lincoln's Inn is
not great. In five minutes we were at the gateway in
Chancery Lane, and a couple of minutes later saw us
gathered round the threshold of the stately old house
in New Square.</p>
<p>"Seems to be a light in the first floor front," said
Badger. "You'd better move away before I ring the
bell."</p>
<p>But the precaution was unnecessary. As the inspector
advanced to the bell-pull a head was thrust out of
the open window immediately above the street door.</p>
<p>"Who are you?" inquired the owner of the head
in a voice which I recognised as that of Mr. Jellicoe.</p>
<p>"I am Inspector Badger, of the Criminal Investigation
Department. I wish to see Mr. Arthur Jellicoe."</p>
<p>"Then look at me. I am Mr. Arthur Jellicoe."</p>
<p>"I hold a warrant for your arrest, Mr. Jellicoe. You
are charged with the murder of Mr. John Bellingham,
whose body has just been discovered in the British
Museum."</p>
<p>"By whom?"</p>
<p>"By Doctor Thorndyke."</p>
<p>"Indeed," said Mr. Jellicoe. "Is he here?"</p>
<p>"Yes."</p>
<p>"Ha! And you wish to arrest me, I presume?"</p>
<p>"Yes. That is what I am here for."</p>
<p>"Well, I will agree to surrender myself subject to
certain conditions."</p>
<p>"I can't make any conditions, Mr. Jellicoe."</p>
<p>"No. I will make them, and you will accept them.
Otherwise you will not arrest me."</p>
<p>"It's no use for you to talk like that," said Badger.
"If you don't let me in I shall have to break in. And
I may as well tell you," he added mendaciously, "that
the house is surrounded."</p>
<p>"You may accept my assurance," Mr. Jellicoe replied
calmly, "that you will not arrest me if you do
not accept my conditions."</p>
<p>"Well, what are your conditions?" demanded
Badger impatiently.</p>
<p>"I desire to make a statement," said Mr. Jellicoe.</p>
<p>"You can do that, but I must caution you that
anything you say may be used in evidence against
you."</p>
<p>"Naturally. But I wish to make the statement in
the presence of Doctor Thorndyke, and I desire to hear
a statement from him of the method of investigation
by which he discovered the whereabouts of the body.
That is to say, if he is willing."</p>
<p>"If you mean that we should mutually enlighten
one another, I am very willing indeed," said Thorndyke.</p>
<p>"Very well. Then my conditions, Inspector, are
that I shall hear Doctor Thorndyke's statement and
that I shall be permitted to make a statement myself,
and that until those statements are completed, with
any necessary interrogation and discussion, I shall remain
at liberty and shall suffer no molestation or interference
of any kind. And I agree that, on the conclusion
of the said proceedings, I will submit without resistance
to any course that you may adopt."</p>
<p>"I can't agree to that," said Badger.</p>
<p>"Can't you?" said Mr. Jellicoe coldly; and, after
a pause, he added: "Don't be hasty. I have given
you full warning."</p>
<p>There was something in Mr. Jellicoe's passionless
tone that disturbed the inspector exceedingly, for he
turned to Thorndyke and said in a low tone:</p>
<p>"I wonder what his game is? He can't get away,
you know."</p>
<p>"There are several possibilities," said Thorndyke.</p>
<p>"M'yes," said Badger, stroking his chin perplexedly.</p>
<p>"After all, is there any objection? His statement
might save trouble, and you'd be on the safe side. It
would take you some time to break in."</p>
<p>"Well," said Mr. Jellicoe, with his hand on the
window, "do you agree—yes or no?"</p>
<p>"All right," said Badger sulkily. "I agree."</p>
<p>"You promise not to molest me in any way until I
have quite finished?"</p>
<p>"I promise."</p>
<p>Mr. Jellicoe's head disappeared and the window
closed. After a short interval we heard the jar of
massive bolts and the clank of a chain, and, as the
heavy door swung open, Mr. Jellicoe stood revealed,
calm and impassive, with an old-fashioned office candlestick
in his hand.</p>
<p>"Who are the others?" he inquired, peering out
sharply through his spectacles.</p>
<p>"O, they are nothing to do with me," replied
Badger.</p>
<p>"They are Doctor Berkeley and Doctor Jervis,"
said Thorndyke.</p>
<p>"Ha!" said Mr. Jellicoe; "very kind and attentive
of them to call. Pray come in, gentlemen. I am sure
you will be interested to hear our little discussion."</p>
<p>He held the door open with a certain stiff courtesy,
and we all entered the hall led by Inspector Badger.
He closed the door softly and preceded us up the stairs
and into the apartment from the window of which he
had dictated the terms of surrender. It was a fine old
room, spacious, lofty, and dignified, with panelled walls
and a carved mantelpiece, the central escutcheon of
which bore the initials "J.W.P." with the date
"1671." A large writing-table stood at the farther
end, and behind it an iron safe.</p>
<p>"I have been expecting this visit," Mr. Jellicoe remarked
tranquilly as he placed four chairs opposite the
table.</p>
<p>"Since when?" asked Thorndyke.</p>
<p>"Since last Monday evening, when I had the pleasure
of seeing you conversing with my friend Doctor Berkeley
at the Inner Temple gate, and then inferred that
you were retained in the case. That was a circumstance
that had not been fully provided for. May I
offer you gentlemen a glass of sherry?" As he spoke
he placed on the table a decanter and a tray of glasses,
and looked at us interrogatively with his hand on the
stopper.</p>
<p>"Well, I don't mind if I do, Mr. Jellicoe," said
Badger, on whom the lawyer's glance had finally
settled. Mr. Jellicoe filled a glass and handed it to
him with a stiff bow; then, with the decanter still in his
hand, he said persuasively: "Doctor Thorndyke, pray
allow me to fill you a glass?"</p>
<p>"No, thank you," said Thorndyke, in a tone so decided
that the inspector looked round at him quickly.
And as Badger caught his eye, the glass which he was
about to raise to his lips became suddenly arrested and
was slowly returned to the table untasted.</p>
<p>"I don't want to hurry you, Mr. Jellicoe," said the
inspector, "but it's rather late, and I should like to
get this business settled. What is it that you wish
to do?"</p>
<p>"I desire," replied Mr. Jellicoe, "to make a detailed
statement of the events that have happened, and I
wish to hear from Doctor Thorndyke precisely how he
arrived at his very remarkable conclusion. When this
has been done I shall be entirely at your service; and
I suggest that it would be more interesting if Doctor
Thorndyke would give us his statement before I furnish
you with the actual facts."</p>
<p>"I am entirely of your opinion," said Thorndyke.</p>
<p>"Then in that case," said Mr. Jellicoe, "I suggest
that you disregard me, and address your remarks to
your friends as if I were not present."</p>
<p>Thorndyke acquiesced with a bow, and Mr. Jellicoe,
having seated himself in his elbow-chair behind the
table, poured himself out a glass of water, selected a
cigarette from a neat silver case, lighted it deliberately,
and leaned back to listen at his ease.</p>
<p>"My first acquaintance with this case," Thorndyke
began without preamble, "was made through the
medium of the daily papers about two years ago; and
I may say that, although I had no interest in it beyond
the purely academic interest of a specialist in a case
that lies in his particular specialty, I considered it with
deep attention. The newspaper reports contained no
particulars of the relations of the parties that could
furnish any hints as to motives on the part of any of
them, but merely a bare statement of the events. And
this was a distinct advantage, inasmuch as it left one
to consider the facts of the case without regard to
motive—to balance the <i>prima facie</i> probabilities with
an open mind. And it may surprise you to learn that
those <i>prima facie</i> probabilities pointed from the very
first to that solution which has been put to the test of
experiment this evening. Hence it will be well for me
to begin by giving the conclusions that I reached by
reasoning from the facts set forth in the newspapers
before any of the further facts came to my knowledge.</p>
<p>"From the facts as stated in the newspaper reports
it is obvious that there were four possible explanations
of the disappearance.</p>
<p>"1. The man might be alive and in hiding. This
was highly improbable, for the reasons that were stated
by Mr. Loram at the late hearing of the application,
and for a further reason that I shall mention presently.</p>
<p>"2. He might have died by accident or disease, and
his body failed to be identified. This was even more
improbable, seeing that he carried on his person abundant
means of identification, including visiting cards.</p>
<p>"3. He might have been murdered by some stranger
for the sake of his portable property. This was highly
improbable for the same reason: his body could hardly
have failed to be identified.</p>
<p>"These three explanations are what we may call the
outside explanations. They touched none of the parties
mentioned; they were all obviously improbable on general
grounds; and to all of them there was one conclusive
answer—the scarab which was found in Godfrey
Bellingham's garden. Hence I put them aside and
gave my attention to the fourth explanation. This
was that the missing man had been made away with by
one of the parties mentioned in the report. But, since
the reports mentioned three parties, it was evident that
there was a choice of three hypotheses, namely:</p>
<p>"(<i>a</i>) That John Bellingham had been made away
with by Hurst; or (<i>b</i>) by the Bellinghams; or (<i>c</i>) by
Mr. Jellicoe.</p>
<p>"Now, I have constantly impressed on my pupils
that the indispensable question that must be asked at
the outset of such an inquiry as this is, 'When was the
missing person last undoubtedly seen or known to be
alive?' That is the question that I asked myself after
reading the newspaper report; and the answer was,
that he was last certainly seen alive on the fourteenth
of October, nineteen hundred and two, at 141 Queen
Square, Bloomsbury. Of the fact that he was alive
at that time and place there could be no doubt whatever;
for he was seen at the same moment by two
persons, both of whom were intimately acquainted with
him, and one of whom, Doctor Norbury, was apparently
a disinterested witness. After that date he was never
seen, alive or dead, by any person who knew him and
was able to identify him. It was stated that he had
been seen on the twenty-third of November following
by the housemaid of Mr. Hurst; but as this person
was unacquainted with him, it was uncertain whether
the person whom she saw was or was not John Bellingham.</p>
<p>"Hence the disappearance dated, not from the
twenty-third of November, as everyone seems to have
assumed, but from the fourteenth of October; and the
question was not, 'What became of John Bellingham
after he entered Mr. Hurst's house?' but, 'What became
of him after his interview in Queen Square?'</p>
<p>"But as soon as I had decided that that interview
must form the real starting-point of the inquiry, a most
striking set of circumstances came into view. It became
obvious that if Mr. Jellicoe had had any reason
for wishing to make away with John Bellingham, he
had such an opportunity as seldom falls to the lot of
an intending murderer.</p>
<p>"Just consider the conditions. John Bellingham was
known to be setting out alone upon a journey beyond
the sea. His exact destination was not stated. He
was to be absent for an undetermined period, but at
least three weeks. His disappearance would occasion
no comment; his absence would lead to no inquiries,
at least for several weeks, during which the murderer
would have leisure quietly to dispose of the body and
conceal all traces of the crime. The conditions were,
from a murderer's point of view, ideal.</p>
<p>"But that was not all. During that very period of
John Bellingham's absence Mr. Jellicoe was engaged to
deliver to the British Museum what was admittedly a
dead human body; and that body was to be enclosed
in a sealed case. Could any more perfect or secure
method of disposing of a body be devised by the most
ingenious murderer? The plan would have had only
one weak point: the mummy would be known to have
left Queen Square <i>after</i> the disappearance of John
Bellingham, and suspicion might in the end have arisen.
To this point I shall return presently; meanwhile we
will consider the second hypothesis—that the missing
man was made away with by Mr. Hurst.</p>
<p>"Now, there seemed to be no doubt that some person,
purporting to be John Bellingham, did actually visit
Mr. Hurst's house; and he must either have left that
house or remained in it. If he left, he did so surreptitiously;
if he remained, there could be no reasonable
doubt that he had been murdered and that his body
had been concealed. Let us consider the probabilities
in each case.</p>
<p>"Assuming—as everyone seems to have done—that
the visitor was really John Bellingham, we are dealing
with a responsible, middle-aged gentleman, and the idea
that such a person would enter a house, announce his
intention of staying, and then steal away unobserved
is very difficult to accept. Moreover, he would appear
to have come down to Eltham by rail immediately on
landing in England, leaving his luggage in the cloak-room
at Charing Cross. This pointed to a definiteness
of purpose quite inconsistent with his casual disappearance
from the house.</p>
<p>"On the other hand, the idea that he might have
been murdered by Hurst was not inconceivable. The
thing was physically possible. If Bellingham had really
been in the study when Hurst came home, the murder
could have been committed—by appropriate means—and
the body temporarily concealed in the cupboard or
elsewhere. But, although possible, it was not at all
probable. There was no real opportunity. The risk
and the subsequent difficulties would be very great;
there was not a particle of positive evidence that a
murder had occurred; and the conduct of Hurst in
immediately leaving the house in possession of the servants
is quite inconsistent with the supposition that there
was a body concealed in it. So that, while it is almost
impossible to believe that John Bellingham left the
house of his own accord, it is equally difficult to believe
that he did not leave it.</p>
<p>"But there is a third possibility, which, strange to
say, no one seems to have suggested. Supposing that
the visitor was not John Bellingham at all, but someone
who was personating him? That would dispose of
the difficulties completely. The strange disappearance
ceases to be strange, for a personator would necessarily
make off before Mr. Hurst should arrive and discover
the imposture. But if we accept this supposition, we
raise two further questions: 'Who was the personator?'
and 'What was the object of the personation?'</p>
<p>"Now, the personator was clearly not Hurst himself,
for he would have been recognised by his housemaid;
he was therefore either Godfrey Bellingham or
Mr. Jellicoe or some other person; and as no other
person was mentioned in the newspaper reports I confined
my speculations to these two.</p>
<p>"And, first, as to Godfrey Bellingham. It did not
appear whether he was or was not known to the housemaid,
so I assumed—wrongly, as it turns out—that he
was not. Then he might have been the personator.
But why should he have personated his brother? He
could not have already committed the murder. There
had not been time enough. He would have had to leave
Woodford before John Bellingham had set out from
Charing Cross. And even if he had committed the
murder, he would have had no object in raising this
commotion. His cue would have been to remain quiet
and know nothing. The probabilities were all against
the personator being Godfrey Bellingham.</p>
<p>"Then could it be Mr. Jellicoe? The answer to this
question is contained in the answer to the further
question: What could have been the object of the
personation?</p>
<p>"What motive could this unknown person have had
in appearing, announcing himself as John Bellingham,
and forthwith vanishing? There could only have been
one motive: that, namely, of fixing the date of John
Bellingham's disappearance—of furnishing a definite
moment at which he was last seen alive.</p>
<p>"But who was likely to have had such a motive?
Let us see.</p>
<p>"I said just now that if Mr. Jellicoe had murdered
John Bellingham and disposed of the body in the
mummy-case, he would have been absolutely safe for
the time being. But there would be a weak spot in
his armour. For a month or more the disappearance
of his client would occasion no remark. But presently,
when he failed to return, inquiries would be set on foot;
and then it would appear that no one had seen him
since he left Queen Square. Then it would be noted
that the last person with whom he was seen was Mr.
Jellicoe. It might, further, be remembered that the
mummy had been delivered to the Museum some time
<i>after</i> the missing man was last seen alive. And so
suspicion might arise and be followed by disastrous
investigations. But supposing it should be made to
appear that John Bellingham had been seen alive more
than a month after his interview with Mr. Jellicoe and
some weeks after the mummy had been deposited in
the Museum? Then Mr. Jellicoe would cease to be
in any way connected with the disappearance, and
henceforth would be absolutely safe.</p>
<p>"Hence, after carefully considering this part of the
newspaper report, I came to the conclusion that the
mysterious occurrence at Mr. Hurst's house had only
one reasonable explanation, namely, that the visitor
was not John Bellingham, but someone personating him;
and that that someone was Mr. Jellicoe.</p>
<p>"It remains to consider the case of Godfrey Bellingham
and his daughter, though I cannot understand
how any sane person can have seriously suspected
either" (here Inspector Badger smiled a sour smile).
"The evidence against them was negligible, for there
was nothing to connect them with the affair save the
finding of the scarab on their premises; and that event,
which might have been highly suspicious under other
circumstances, was robbed of any significance by the
fact that the scarab was found on a spot which had
been passed a few minutes previously by the other
suspected party, Hurst. The finding of the scarab
did, however, establish two important conclusions;
namely, that John Bellingham had probably met with
foul play, and that of the four persons present when
it was found, one at least had had possession of the
body. As to which of the four was the one, the circumstances
furnished only a hint, which was this: If
the scarab had been purposely dropped, the most likely
person to find it was the one who dropped it. And the
person who discovered it was Mr. Jellicoe.</p>
<p>"Following up this hint, if we ask ourselves what
motive Mr. Jellicoe could have had for dropping it—assuming
him to be the murderer—the answer is
obvious. It would not be his policy to fix the crime
on any particular person, but rather to set up a complication
of conflicting evidence which would occupy
the attention of investigators and divert it from himself.</p>
<p>"Of course, if Hurst had been the murderer, he
would have had a sufficient motive for dropping the
scarab, so that the case against Mr. Jellicoe was not
conclusive; but the fact that it was he who found it
was highly significant.</p>
<p>"This completes the analysis of the evidence contained
in the original newspaper report describing the
circumstances of the disappearance. The conclusions
that followed from it were, as you will have seen:</p>
<p>"1. That the missing man was almost certainly dead,
as proved by the finding of the scarab after his disappearance.</p>
<p>"2. That he had probably been murdered by one or
more of four persons, as proved by the finding of the
scarab on the premises occupied by two of them and
accessible to the others.</p>
<p>"3. That, of those four persons, one—Mr. Jellicoe—was
the last person who was known to have been in
the company of the missing man; had had an exceptional
opportunity for committing the murder; and
was known to have delivered a dead body to the Museum
subsequently to the disappearance.</p>
<p>"4. That the supposition that Mr. Jellicoe had committed
the murder rendered all the other circumstances
of the disappearance clearly intelligible, whereas on
any other supposition they were quite inexplicable.</p>
<p>"The evidence of the newspaper report, therefore,
clearly pointed to the probability that John Bellingham
had been murdered by Mr. Jellicoe and his body concealed
in the mummy-case.</p>
<p>"I do not wish to give you the impression that I,
then and there, believed that Mr. Jellicoe was the murderer.
I did not. There was no reason to suppose
that the report contained all the essential facts, and I
merely considered it speculatively as a study in probabilities.
But I did decide that that was the only probable
conclusion from the facts that were given.</p>
<p>"Nearly two years passed before I heard anything
more of the case. Then it was brought to my notice
by my friend, Doctor Berkeley, and I became acquainted
with certain new facts, which I will consider
in the order in which they became known to me.</p>
<p>"The first new light on the case came from the will.
As soon as I had read that document I felt convinced
that there was something wrong. The testator's evident
intention was that his brother should inherit the
property, whereas the construction of the will was such
as almost certainly to defeat that intention. The devolution
of the property depended on the burial clause—clause
two; but the burial arrangements would ordinarily
be decided by the executor, who happened to be
Mr. Jellicoe. Thus the will left the disposition of the
property under the control of Mr. Jellicoe, though his
action could have been contested.</p>
<p>"Now, this will, although drawn up by John Bellingham,
was executed in Mr. Jellicoe's office, as is proved
by the fact that it was witnessed by two of his clerks.
He was the testator's lawyer, and it was his duty to
insist on the will being properly drawn. Evidently he
did nothing of the kind, and this fact strongly suggested
some kind of collusion on his part with Hurst,
who stood to benefit by the miscarriage of the will.
And this was the odd feature in the case; for whereas
the party responsible for the defective provisions was
Mr. Jellicoe, the party who benefited was Hurst.</p>
<p>"But the most startling peculiarity of the will was
the way in which it fitted the circumstances of the disappearance.
It looked as if clause two had been drawn
up with those very circumstances in view. Since, however,
the will was ten years old, this was impossible.
But if clause two could not have been devised to fit
the disappearance, could the disappearance have been
devised to fit clause two? That was by no means impossible:
under the circumstances it looked rather
probable. And if it had been so contrived, who was
the agent in that contrivance? Hurst stood to benefit,
but there was no evidence that he even knew the contents
of the will. There remained only Mr. Jellicoe,
who had certainly connived at the misdrawing of the
will for some purpose of his own—some dishonest
purpose.</p>
<p>"The evidence of the will, then, pointed to Mr.
Jellicoe as the agent in the disappearance, and, after
reading it, I definitely suspected him of the crime.</p>
<p>"Suspicion, however, is one thing and proof is another.
I had not nearly enough evidence to justify me
in laying an information, and I could not approach the
Museum officials without making a definite accusation.
The great difficulty of the case was that I could discover
no motive. I could not see any way in which
Mr. Jellicoe would benefit by the disappearance. His
own legacy was secure, whenever and however the testator
died. The murder and concealment apparently
benefited Hurst alone; and, in the absence of any
plausible motive, the facts required to be much more
conclusive than they were."</p>
<p>"Did you form absolutely no opinion as to motive?"
asked Mr. Jellicoe.</p>
<p>He put the question in a quiet, passionless tone, as
if he were discussing some <i>cause célèbre</i> in which he
had nothing more than a professional interest. Indeed,
the calm, impersonal interest that he displayed in
Thorndyke's analysis, his unmoved attention, punctuated
by little nods of approval at each telling point in
the argument, were the most surprising features of this
astounding interview.</p>
<p>"I did form an opinion," replied Thorndyke, "but
it was merely speculative, and I was never able to confirm
it. I discovered that about ten years ago Mr.
Hurst had been in difficulties and that he had suddenly
raised a considerable sum of money, no one knew how
or on what security. I observed that this event coincided
in time with the execution of the will, and I surmised
that there might be some connection between
them. But that was only a surmise; and, as the proverb
has it, 'He discovers who proves.' I could prove
nothing, so that I never discovered Mr. Jellicoe's motive,
and I don't know it now."</p>
<p>"Don't you, really?" said Mr. Jellicoe, in something
approaching a tone of animation. He laid down the
end of his cigarette, and, as he selected another from
the silver case, he continued: "I think that is the most
interesting feature of your really remarkable analysis.
It does you great credit. The absence of motive would
have appeared to most persons a fatal objection to the
theory of, what I may call, the prosecution. Permit
me to congratulate you on the consistency and tenacity
with which you have pursued the actual, visible facts."</p>
<p>He bowed stiffly to Thorndyke (who returned his
bow with equal stiffness), lighted the fresh cigarette,
and once more leaned back in his chair with the calm,
attentive manner of a man who is listening to a lecture
or a musical performance.</p>
<p>"The evidence, then, being insufficient to act upon,"
Thorndyke resumed, "there was nothing for it but to
wait for some new facts. Now, the study of a large
series of carefully conducted murders brings into view
an almost invariable phenomenon. The cautious murderer,
in his anxiety to make himself secure, does too
much; and it is this excess of precaution that leads
to detection. It happens constantly; indeed, I may
say that it always happens—in those murders that are
detected; of those that are not we say nothing—and
I had strong hopes that it would happen in this case.
And it did.</p>
<p>"At the very moment when my client's case seemed
almost hopeless, some human remains were discovered
at Sidcup. I read the account of the discovery in the
evening paper, and, scanty as the report was, it recorded
enough facts to convince me that the inevitable
mistake had been made."</p>
<p>"Did it, indeed?" said Mr. Jellicoe. "A mere, inexpert,
hearsay report! I should have supposed it to
be quite valueless from a scientific point of view."</p>
<p>"So it was," said Thorndyke. "But it gave the
date of the discovery and the locality, and it also mentioned
what bones had been found. Which were all
vital facts. Take the question of time. These remains,
after lying <i>perdu</i> for two years, suddenly come to light
just as the parties—who have also been lying <i>perdu</i>—have
begun to take action in respect of the will; in
fact, within a week or two of the hearing of the application.
It was certainly a remarkable coincidence.
And when the circumstances that occasioned the discovery
were considered, the coincidence became still
more remarkable. For these remains were found on
land actually belonging to John Bellingham, and their
discovery resulted from certain operations (the clearing
of the watercress-beds) carried out on behalf of the
absent landlord. But by whose orders were those works
undertaken? Clearly by the orders of the landlord's
agent. But the landlord's agent was known to be Mr.
Jellicoe. Therefore these remains were brought to light
at this peculiarly opportune moment by the action of
Mr. Jellicoe. The coincidence, I say again, was very
remarkable.</p>
<p>"But what instantly arrested my attention on reading
the newspaper report was the unusual manner in
which the arm had been separated; for, besides the
bones of the arm proper, there were those of what
anatomists call the 'shoulder-girdle'—the shoulder-blade
and collar-bone. This was very remarkable. It
seemed to suggest a knowledge of anatomy, and yet
no murderer, even if he possessed such knowledge, would
make a display of it on such an occasion. It seemed
to me that there must be some other explanation.
Accordingly, when other remains had come to light and
all had been collected at Woodford, I asked my friend
Berkeley to go down there and inspect them. He did
so, and this is what he found:</p>
<p>"Both arms had been detached in the same peculiar
manner; both were complete, and all the bones were
from the same body. The bones were quite clean—of
soft structures, I mean. There were no cuts, scratches,
or marks on them. There was not a trace of adipocere—the
peculiar waxy soap that forms in bodies that
decay in water or in a damp situation. The right hand
had been detached at the time the arm was thrown
into the pond, and the left ring finger had been
separated and had vanished. This latter fact had attracted
my attention from the first, but I will leave its
consideration for the moment and return to it later."</p>
<p>"How did you discover that the hand had been
detached?" Mr. Jellicoe asked.</p>
<p>"By the submersion marks," replied Thorndyke.
"It was lying on the bottom of the pond in a position
which would have been impossible if it had been
attached to the arm."</p>
<p>"You interest me exceedingly," said Mr. Jellicoe.
"It appears that a medico-legal expert finds 'books
in the running brooks, sermons in bones, and
evidence in everything.' But don't let me interrupt
you."</p>
<p>"Doctor Berkeley's observations," Thorndyke resumed,
"together with the medical evidence at the inquest,
led me to certain conclusions.</p>
<p>"Let me first state the facts which were disclosed.</p>
<p>"The remains which had been assembled formed a
complete human skeleton with the exception of the
skull, one finger, and the legs from knee to ankle, including
both knee-caps. This was a very impressive
fact; for the bones that were missing included all those
which could have been identified as belonging or not
belonging to John Bellingham; and the bones that were
present were the unidentifiable remainder.</p>
<p>"It had a suspicious appearance of selection.</p>
<p>"But the parts that were present were also curiously
suggestive. In all cases the mode of dismemberment
was peculiar; for an ordinary person would have divided
the knee-joint leaving the knee-cap attached to the
thigh, whereas it had evidently been left attached to
the shin-bone; and the head would most probably have
been removed by cutting through the neck instead of
being neatly detached from the spine. And all these
bones were also entirely free from marks or scratches
such as would naturally occur in an ordinary dismemberment,
and all were quite free from adipocere.
And now as to the conclusions which I drew from these
facts. First, there was the peculiar grouping of the
bones. What was the meaning of that? Well, the
idea of a punctilious anatomist was obviously absurd,
and I put it aside. But was there any other explanation?
Yes, there was. The bones had appeared in the
natural groups that are held together by ligaments;
and they had separated at points where they were
attached principally by muscles. The knee-cap, for
instance, which really belongs to the thigh, is attached
to it by muscle, but to the shin-bone by a stout ligament.
And so with the bones of the arm; they are connected
to one another by ligaments; but to the trunk
only by muscle, excepting at one end of the collar-bone.</p>
<p>"But this was a very significant fact. Ligament
decays much more slowly than muscle, so that in a
body of which the muscles had largely decayed the
bones might still be held together by ligament. The
peculiar grouping therefore suggested that the body
had been partly reduced to a skeleton before it was
dismembered; that it had then been merely pulled apart
and not divided with a knife.</p>
<p>"This suggestion was remarkably confirmed by the
total absence of knife-cuts or scratches.</p>
<p>"Then there was the fact that all the bones were
quite free from adipocere. Now, if an arm or a thigh
should be deposited in water and left undisturbed to
decay, it is certain that large masses of adipocere would
be formed. Probably more than half of the flesh would
be converted into this substance. The absence of adipocere
therefore proved that the bulk of the flesh had
disappeared or been removed from the bones before
they were deposited in the pond. That, in fact, it was
not a body, but a skeleton, that had been deposited.</p>
<p>"But what kind of skeleton? If it was the recent
skeleton of a murdered man, then the bones had been
carefully stripped of flesh so as to leave the ligaments
intact. But this was highly improbable; for there could
be no object in preserving the ligaments. And the
absence of scratches was against this view.</p>
<p>"Then they did not appear to be graveyard bones.
The collection was too complete. It is very rare to find
a graveyard skeleton of which many of the small bones
are not missing. And such bones are usually more or
less weathered and friable.</p>
<p>"They did not appear to be bones such as may be
bought at an osteological dealer's, for these usually
have perforations to admit the macerating fluid to the
marrow cavities. Dealers' bones, too, are very seldom
all from the same body; and the small bones of the
hand are drilled with holes to enable them to be strung
on catgut.</p>
<p>"They were not dissecting-room bones, as there was
no trace of red-lead in the openings for the nutrient
arteries.</p>
<p>"What the appearances did suggest was that these
were parts of a body which had decayed in a very dry
atmosphere (in which no adipocere would be formed),
and which had been pulled or broken apart. Also that
the ligaments which held the body—or rather skeleton—together
were brittle and friable, as suggested by the
detached hand, which had probably broken off accidentally.
But the only kind of body that completely
answers this description is an Egyptian mummy. A
mummy, it is true, has been more or less preserved;
but on exposure to the air of such a climate as ours it
perishes rapidly, the ligaments being the last of the
soft parts to disappear.</p>
<p>"The hypothesis that these bones were parts of a
mummy naturally suggested Mr. Jellicoe. If he had
murdered John Bellingham and concealed his body in
the mummy-case, he would have a spare mummy on
his hands, and that mummy would have been exposed
to the air and to somewhat rough handling.</p>
<p>"A very interesting circumstance connected with
these remains was that the ring finger was missing.
Now, fingers have on sundry occasions been detached
from dead hands for the sake of the rings on them.
But in such cases the object has been to secure a valuable
ring uninjured. If this hand was the hand of
John Bellingham, there was no such object. The purpose
was to prevent identification; and that purpose
would have been more easily, and much more completely,
achieved by sacrificing the ring, by filing through it or
breaking it off the finger. The appearances, therefore,
did not quite agree with the apparent purpose.</p>
<p>"Then, could there be any other purpose with which
they agreed better? Yes, there could.</p>
<p>"If it had happened that John Bellingham were
known to have worn a ring on that finger, and especially
if that ring fitted tightly, the removal of the finger
would serve a very useful purpose. It would create
an impression that the finger had been removed on
account of a ring, to prevent identification; which impression
would, in turn, produce a suspicion that the
hand was that of John Bellingham. And yet it would
not be evidence that could be used to establish identity.
Now, if Mr. Jellicoe were the murderer and had the
body hidden elsewhere, vague suspicion would be precisely
what he would desire, and positive evidence what
he would wish to avoid.</p>
<p>"It transpired later that John Bellingham did wear
a ring on that finger and that the ring fitted very
tightly. Whence it followed that the absence of the
finger was an additional point tending to implicate Mr.
Jellicoe.</p>
<p>"And now let us briefly review this mass of evidence.
You will see that it consists of a multitude of items,
each either trivial or speculative. Up to the time of
the actual discovery I had not a single crucial fact,
nor any clue as to motive. But, slight as the individual
points of evidence were, they pointed with impressive
unanimity to one person—Mr. Jellicoe. Thus:</p>
<p>"The person who had the opportunity to commit the
murder and dispose of the body was Mr. Jellicoe.</p>
<p>"The deceased was last certainly seen alive with
Mr. Jellicoe.</p>
<p>"An unidentified human body was delivered to the
Museum by Mr. Jellicoe.</p>
<p>"The only person who could have a motive for
personating the deceased was Mr. Jellicoe.</p>
<p>"The only known person who could possibly have
done so was Mr. Jellicoe.</p>
<p>"One of the two persons who could have had a
motive for dropping the scarab was Mr. Jellicoe. The
person who found that scarab was Mr. Jellicoe,
although, owing to his defective eyesight and his
spectacles, he was the most unlikely person of those present
to find it.</p>
<p>"The person who was responsible for the execution
of the defective will was Mr. Jellicoe.</p>
<p>"Then as to the remains. They were apparently
not those of John Bellingham, but parts of a particular
kind of body. But the only person who was known
to have had such a body in his possession was Mr.
Jellicoe.</p>
<p>"The only person who could have had any motive
for substituting those remains for the remains of the
deceased was Mr. Jellicoe.</p>
<p>"Finally, the person who caused the discovery of
those remains at that singularly opportune moment was
Mr. Jellicoe.</p>
<p>"This was the sum of the evidence that was in my
possession up to the time of the hearing, and, indeed,
for some time after, and it was not enough to act
upon. But when the case had been heard in Court, it
was evident either that the proceedings would be abandoned—which
was unlikely—or that there would be
new developments.</p>
<p>"I watched the progress of events with profound
interest. An attempt had been made (by Mr. Jellicoe
or some other person) to get the will administered without
producing the body of John Bellingham; and that
attempt had failed. The coroner's jury had refused to
identify the remains; the Probate Court had refused
to presume the death of the testator. As affairs stood,
the will could not be administered.</p>
<p>"What would be the next move?</p>
<p>"It was virtually certain that it would consist in
the production of something which would identify the
unrecognised remains as those of the testator.</p>
<p>"But what would that something be?</p>
<p>"The answer to that question would contain the
answer to another question: Was my solution of the
mystery the true solution?</p>
<p>"If I was wrong, it was possible that some of the
undoubtedly genuine bones of John Bellingham might
presently be discovered; for instance, the skull, the
knee-cap, or the left fibula, by any of which the remains
could be positively identified.</p>
<p>"If I was right, only one thing could possibly happen.
Mr. Jellicoe would have to play the trump card
that he had been holding back in case the Court should
refuse the application; a card that he was evidently reluctant
to play.</p>
<p>"He would have to produce the bones of the
mummy's finger, together with John Bellingham's ring.
No other course was possible.</p>
<p>"But not only would the bones and the ring have
to be found together. They would have to be found
in a place which was accessible to Mr. Jellicoe, and so
far under his control that he could determine the exact
time when the discovery should be made.</p>
<p>"I waited patiently for the answer to my question.
Was I right or was I wrong?</p>
<p>"And in due course, the answer came.</p>
<p>"The bones and the ring were discovered in the well
in the grounds of Godfrey Bellingham's late house.
That house was the property of John Bellingham. Mr.
Jellicoe was John Bellingham's agent. Hence it was
practically certain that the date on which the well was
emptied was settled by Mr. Jellicoe.</p>
<p>"The Oracle had spoken.</p>
<p>"The discovery proved conclusively that the bones
were not those of John Bellingham (for if they had
been the ring would have been unnecessary for
identification). But if the bones were not John Bellingham's,
the ring was; from which followed the important
corollary that whoever had deposited those bones in
the well had had possession of the body of John
Bellingham. And there could be no doubt that that person
was Mr. Jellicoe.</p>
<p>"On receiving this final confirmation of my
conclusions, I applied forthwith to Doctor Norbury for
permission to examine the mummy of Sebek-hotep, with
the result that you are already acquainted with."</p>
<p>As Thorndyke concluded, Mr. Jellicoe regarded him
thoughtfully for a moment, and then said: "You have
given us a most complete and lucid exposition of your
method of investigation, sir. I have enjoyed it exceedingly,
and should have profited by it hereafter—under
other circumstances. Are you sure you won't allow
me to fill your glass?" He touched the stopper of
the decanter, and Inspector Badger ostentatiously consulted
his watch.</p>
<p>"Time is running on, I fear," said Mr. Jellicoe.</p>
<p>"It is, indeed," Badger assented emphatically.</p>
<p>"Well, I need not detain you long," said the lawyer.
"My statement is a mere narration of events. But I
desire to make it, and you, no doubt, will be interested
to hear it."</p>
<p>He opened the silver case and selected a fresh cigarette,
which, however, he did not light. Inspector
Badger produced a funereal notebook, which he laid
open on his knee; and the rest of us settled ourselves
in our chairs with no little curiosity to hear Mr. Jellicoe's
statement.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />