<h2><SPAN name="CHAPTER_IV" id="CHAPTER_IV"></SPAN>CHAPTER IV.</h2>
<h3>MUSIC IN INDIA, CHINA AND JAPAN.</h3>
<hr style="width: 15%;" />
<h3>I.</h3>
<p><ANTIMG src="images/capv.png" width-obs="127" height-obs="100" alt="V" title="V" class="floatl" />ERY important developments of the art of music took place in India
from a remote period, but dates are entirely uncertain. When the hymns
of the Rig-Veda were collected into their present form, which appears
to have been about 1500 B.C., music was highly esteemed. It was in
India that the art of inciting vibrations of a string by means of a
bow was discovered; and our violin had its origin there, but the date
is entirely unknown. The primitive violin was the ravanastron, which
the Ceylonese claim to have been invented by one of their kings, who
reigned about 5000 B.C. The form of this instrument is given in Fig.
16. It must have been some time before the Mohammedan invasion, for
they brought a rude violin back to Arabia, from whence it came into
Europe after the crusades. They had many forms of guitar, instruments
of percussion, and the varieties of viol, as well as trumpets and the
like. The national instrument was the vina. This was a sort of guitar,
its body made of a strip of bamboo about eight inches wide and four
feet long. Near each end a large gourd was fixed, for reinforcing the
resonance. In playing, it was held obliquely in front of the player,
like a guitar, one gourd<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_71" id="Page_71">[Pg 71]</SPAN></span> resting upon the left shoulder, the other
under the right arm. It was strung with six strings of silk and wire,
and had a very elaborate apparatus of frets, much higher than those of
a guitar, many of them movable, in order to permit modulation into any
of the twenty-four Hindoo "modes." The instrument had a light, thin
tone, not unpleasing. A fine specimen is figured in "Hipkins' Plates
of Rare Instruments" in the South Kensington Museum, a copy of which
may be seen in the Newberry Library.</p>
<p> </p>
<p style="text-align: center"><SPAN name="FIG_15">
<ANTIMG src="images/fig15.png" width-obs="300" height-obs="248" alt="Fig. 15" title="Fig. 15" /></SPAN></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><b>Fig. 15.</b></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><b>JIWAN CHAH.</b></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><b>[Portrait of Jiwan Chah, one of the latest
masters of the vina. He died about 1790.]</b></p>
<p> </p>
<p>The Hindoos carried the theory of music to an extremely fine point,
having many curious scales, some of them with twenty-four divisions in
an octave. Twenty-two was the usual number. The pitch of each note in<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_72" id="Page_72">[Pg 72]</SPAN></span>
every mode was accurately calculated mathematically, and the frets of
the vina located thereby, according to very old theoretical works by
one Soma, written in Sanskrit at least as early as 1500 B.C. When this
work first became known to Europeans, its elaboration led it to be
regarded as a purely theoretical fancy piece, and it was thought to be
impossible that practical musicians could have been governed by
theories apparently so fine-drawn. A study of the structure of the
vina, however, perfectly adapted to these theories, set all doubts at
rest. None of the intervals of the Hindoo scale exactly correspond to
our own. Harmony they never conceived. Well sounding chords are
impossible in their scales. All their music was monodic—one-voiced.</p>
<p> </p>
<p style="text-align: center">
<SPAN name="FIG_16">
<ANTIMG src="images/fig16.png" width-obs="128" height-obs="300" alt="Fig. 16" title="Fig. 16" /></SPAN></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><b>Fig. 16.</b></p>
<p><span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_73" id="Page_73">[Pg 73]</SPAN></span></p>
<p> </p>
<p>There was a curious development of the musical drama in India about
300 B.C., having certain of the traits of modern opera. Several of
these ancient pieces have come down to us, but without the musical
notes. They are long, consisting of as many as eleven acts, part of
them sung, part spoken. Curiously enough, the different acts are not
all in the same dialect. The musical acts are in Sanskrit, which had
then ceased to be a spoken language for at least 500 years; the spoken
acts were in Pakrit, a dialect of Sanskrit, which likewise had ceased
to be spoken for several centuries. A fuller account of the Hindoo
drama is given in Wilson's "Theater of the Hindoos." The curious
circumstance of the drama of the Hindoos of this epoch is that it was
contemporaneous with another very celebrated development of musical
drama in Greece.</p>
<p>Besides the primitive form of the bowed instrument, the ravanastron
(<SPAN href="#FIG_16">Fig. 16</SPAN>), many forms more advanced are figured among the instruments
from India in European museums, but as they are all of absurd and
impossible acoustical conception, besides being most likely of
comparatively modern origin, we do not present them at this point.
Later, in the history of the violin, one or two of the most curious
will be given.</p>
<h3>II.</h3>
<p>China has had an art of music from extremely remote periods, and
singularly sagacious ideas concerning the art were advanced there very
long ago, at a time when Europe and most other parts of the world were
still in the darkness of barbarism. For example: There is a saying of
the Emperor Tschun, about 2300 B.C., "Teach the children of the great;
thereby reached through thy<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_74" id="Page_74">[Pg 74]</SPAN></span> care they will become mild and
reasonable, and the unmanageable ones able to receive dignities
without arrogance or assumption. This teaching must thou embody in
poems, and sing them therewith to suitable melodies and with the play
of instrumental accompaniment. The music must follow the sense of the
words; if they are simple and natural then also must the music be
easy, unforced and without pretension. Music is the expression of
soul-feeling. If now the soul of the musician be virtuous, so also
will his music become noble and full of virtuous expression, and will
set the souls of men in union with those of the spirits in heaven."
(Quoted by Ambros.)</p>
<p> </p>
<p style="text-align: center"><SPAN name="FIG_17">
<ANTIMG src="images/fig17.png" width-obs="400" height-obs="85" alt="Fig. 17" title="Fig. 17" /></SPAN></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><b>Fig. 17.</b></p>
<p> </p>
<p>The principal instruments of Chinese music are the Kin and the Ke. The
former is a sort of guitar, of which no illustration has come to hand.
The main instrument of their culture-music is the ke, a stringed
instrument entirely unlike any other of which we have accounts, saving
the Japanese ko-ko, which was most likely derived from it. The ke is
strung with fifty strings of silk. Originally it had but twenty-five,
but in the reign of Hoang-Ti, about 2637 B.C., it is said to have been
enlarged to its present dimensions and compass. The appearance of the
ke and the arrangement of its bridges are shown in <SPAN href="#FIG_17">Fig. 17</SPAN>. The
strings were plucked with the fingers.</p>
<p>In the earlier times the Chinese had the pentatonic scale,
approximately the same as that of the black keys<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_75" id="Page_75">[Pg 75]</SPAN></span> of the piano. Later
it was enlarged to seven notes in the octave, and it is claimed by
some that long before the Christian era they had a complete chromatic
scale of twelve tones in the octave. The evidence upon this point,
however, is insufficient. And even if they had this musical resource
at so early a period the fact counts very little to their credit,
since at best the chromatic scale is only an impure harmonic
compromise, which they have never learned to use understandingly.
Chinese music has always been monodic, and they use a great variety of
melodic shadings composed of intervals of small fractions of a step.
These they call lu. There are movable bridges which can be placed in
such way as to divide the strings of the ke at proper proportions of
its length for producing the lu. The places for the fingers upon the
finger board are marked by small brass points. Besides the intonations
due to stopping the strings, the players upon the ke are in the habit
of adding expression in a manner analogous to that of the <i>tremolo</i> of
the modern violinist. With the left hand he touches the string beyond
the bridge and pulls it slightly, thus imparting to the tone a sliding
intonation upward or downward, familiar to all who have experimented
with strings. This habit the Japanese still have in playing their
ko-ko, and the results are said to be not unpleasing. The volume of
tone in the ke is very light, but the quality is sweet.</p>
<p>As a natural consequence of the long existence of this nation and
their commercial relations to the other parts of the world, which with
all their care they have never been able wholly to avoid, the Chinese
have many other varieties of instruments, including many trumpets; an
unexampled wealth of instruments of percussion, and a<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_76" id="Page_76">[Pg 76]</SPAN></span> few of the
ruder types of the violin kind, which seem to have come in from India
or Thibet by the way of the Buddhist monks. The ravanastron is a
common instrument with the mendicant friars of this order. The
characteristic instrument of the Chinese, however, the one which
stands as the representative of all their higher musical culture, is
the ke.</p>
<p>In common with all other nations of antiquity, and with some of the
present day, the Chinese have always held strong conservative
opinions. The principle has been held among them from the earliest
times that the pattern of a good thing, whether a religion, an art or
a mechanism, having once been found satisfactory, should be made
official and never afterward changed. This principle, taken in
connection with the limited powers of their chief instrument, accounts
for the small progress they have made in music within the past 2000
years. It must be remembered, however, that our knowledge of the music
of this country is still far from perfect, the travelers and
missionaries from whom it has reached us not having been practical
musicians, nor having had sufficiently long opportunities for
mastering musical systems so different from what they had previously
known, and so contrary to all their inherited percepts of tone.</p>
<p> </p>
<p style="text-align: center"><SPAN name="FIG_18">
<ANTIMG src="images/fig18.png" width-obs="400" height-obs="84" alt="Fig. 18" title="Fig. 18" /></SPAN></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><b>Fig. 18.</b></p>
<p> </p>
<p><span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_77" id="Page_77">[Pg 77]</SPAN></span></p>
<p>The Japanese are a very musical people in their way. The chief
instrument of their culture is the ko-ko. (See <SPAN href="#FIG_18">Fig. 18</SPAN>.)</p>
<p>In structure it much resembles the Chinese ke. They have also many
other instruments, especially various kinds of imperfect guitars, a
few rude violins, and the usual outfit of trumpets, reed pipes and
instruments of percussion. Like all the other barbarous nations, they
have never had harmony until since they began to learn it from the
Europeans.</p>
<p> </p>
<p style="text-align: center">
<ANTIMG src="images/deco3.png" width-obs="73" height-obs="75" alt="decoration" title="decoration" /></p>
<hr style="width: 65%;" />
<p><span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_79" id="Page_79">[Pg 79]</SPAN></span></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><SPAN name="Book_Second" id="Book_Second"></SPAN>
<ANTIMG src="images/book2.png" width-obs="200" height-obs="34" alt="Book Second." title="Book Second." /></p>
<hr style="width: 15%;" />
<h3>THE</h3>
<h1>Apprentice Period of Modern Music.</h1>
<hr style="width: 15%;" />
<h3>THE DEVELOPMENT OF HARMONY, TONALITY,<br/> CANONIC IMITATION AND POLYPHONY.</h3>
<h3>THE GENERAL POPULARIZATION<br/> OF THE ART OF MUSIC IN<br/> EVERY DIRECTION.</h3>
<hr style="width: 65%;" />
<p><span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_81" id="Page_81">[Pg 81]</SPAN></span></p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />