<p><SPAN name="link2H_4_0029" id="link2H_4_0029"></SPAN></p>
<h2> Of the True Greatness Of Kingdoms And Estates </h2>
<p>THE speech of Themistocles the Athenian, which was haughty and arrogant,
in taking so much to himself, had been a grave and wise observation and
censure, applied at large to others. Desired at a feast to touch a lute,
he said, He could not fiddle, but yet he could make a small town, a great
city. These words (holpen a little with a metaphor) may express two
differing abilities, in those that deal in business of estate. For if a
true survey be taken of counsellors and statesmen, there may be found
(though rarely) those which can make a small state great, and yet cannot
fiddle; as on the other side, there will be found a great many, that can
fiddle very cunningly, but yet are so far from being able to make a small
state great, as their gift lieth the other way; to bring a great and
flourishing estate, to ruin and decay. And certainly whose degenerate arts
and shifts, whereby many counsellors and governors gain both favor with
their masters, and estimation with the vulgar, deserve no better name than
fiddling; being things rather pleasing for the time, and graceful to
themselves only, than tending to the weal and advancement of the state
which they serve. There are also (no doubt) counsellors and governors
which may be held sufficient (negotiis pares), able to manage affairs, and
to keep them from precipices and manifest inconveniences; which
nevertheless are far from the ability to raise and amplify an estate in
power, means, and fortune. But be the workmen what they may be, let us
speak of the work; that is, the true greatness of kingdoms and estates,
and the means thereof. An argument fit for great and mighty princes to
have in their hand; to the end that neither by over-measuring their
forces, they leese themselves in vain enterprises; nor on the other side,
by undervaluing them, they descend to fearful and pusillanimous counsels.</p>
<p>The greatness of an estate, in bulk and territory, doth fall under
measure; and the greatness of finances and revenue, doth fall under
computation. The population may appear by musters; and the number and
greatness of cities and towns by cards and maps. But yet there is not any
thing amongst civil affairs more subject to error, than the right
valuation and true judgment concerning the power and forces of an estate.
The kingdom of heaven is compared, not to any great kernel or nut, but to
a grain of mustard-seed: which is one of the least grains, but hath in it
a property and spirit hastily to get up and spread. So are there states,
great in territory, and yet not apt to enlarge or command; and some that
have but a small dimension of stem, and yet apt to be the foundations of
great monarchies.</p>
<p>Walled towns, stored arsenals and armories, goodly races of horse,
chariots of war, elephants, ordnance, artillery, and the like; all this is
but a sheep in a lion's skin, except the breed and disposition of the
people, be stout and warlike. Nay, number (itself) in armies importeth not
much, where the people is of weak courage; for (as Virgil saith) It never
troubles a wolf, how many the sheep be. The army of the Persians, in the
plains of Arbela, was such a vast sea of people, as it did somewhat
astonish the commanders in Alexander's army; who came to him therefore,
and wished him to set upon them by night; and he answered, He would not
pilfer the victory. And the defeat was easy. When Tigranes the Armenian,
being encamped upon a hill with four hundred thousand men, discovered the
army of the Romans, being not above fourteen thousand, marching towards
him, he made himself merry with it, and said, Yonder men are too many for
an embassage, and too few for a fight. But before the sun set, he found
them enow to give him the chase with infinite slaughter. Many are the
examples of the great odds, between number and courage; so that a man may
truly make a judgment, that the principal point of greatness in any state,
is to have a race of military men. Neither is money the sinews of war (as
it is trivially said), where the sinews of men's arms, in base and
effeminate people, are failing. For Solon said well to Croesus (when in
ostentation he showed him his gold), Sir, if any other come, that hath
better iron, than you, he will be master of all this gold. Therefore let
any prince or state think solely of his forces, except his militia of
natives be of good and valiant soldiers. And let princes, on the other
side, that have subjects of martial disposition, know their own strength;
unless they be otherwise wanting unto themselves. As for mercenary forces
(which is the help in this case), all examples show, that whatsoever
estate or prince doth rest upon them, he may spread his feathers for a
time, but he will mew them soon after.</p>
<p>The blessing of Judah and Issachar will never meet; that the same people,
or nation, should be both the lion's whelp and the ass between burthens;
neither will it be, that a people overlaid with taxes, should ever become
valiant and martial. It is true that taxes levied by consent of the
estate, do abate men's courage less: as it hath been seen notably, in the
excises of the Low Countries; and, in some degree, in the subsidies of
England. For you must note, that we speak now of the heart, and not of the
purse. So that although the same tribute and tax, laid by consent or by
imposing, be all one to the purse, yet it works diversely upon the
courage. So that you may conclude, that no people overcharged with
tribute, is fit for empire.</p>
<p>Let states that aim at greatness, take heed how their nobility and
gentlemen do multiply too fast. For that maketh the common subject, grow
to be a peasant and base swain, driven out of heart, and in effect but the
gentleman's laborer. Even as you may see in coppice woods; if you leave
your staddles too thick, you shall never have clean underwood, but shrubs
and bushes. So in countries, if the gentlemen be too many, the commons
will be base; and you will bring it to that, that not the hundred poll,
will be fit for an helmet; especially as to the infantry, which is the
nerve of an army; and so there will be great population, and little
strength. This which I speak of, hath been nowhere better seen, than by
comparing of England and France; whereof England, though far less in
territory and population, hath been (nevertheless) an overmatch; in regard
the middle people of England make good soldiers, which the peasants of
France do not. And herein the device of king Henry the Seventh (whereof I
have spoken largely in the History of his Life) was profound and
admirable; in making farms and houses of husbandry of a standard; that is,
maintained with such a proportion of land unto them, as may breed a
subject to live in convenient plenty and no servile condition; and to keep
the plough in the hands of the owners, and not mere hirelings. And thus
indeed you shall attain to Virgil's character which he gives to ancient
Italy:</p>
<p>Terra potens armis atque ubere glebae.</p>
<p>Neither is that state (which, for any thing I know, is almost peculiar to
England, and hardly to be found anywhere else, except it be perhaps in
Poland) to be passed over; I mean the state of free servants, and
attendants upon noblemen and gentlemen; which are no ways inferior unto
the yeomanry for arms. And therefore out of all questions, the splendor
and magnificence, and great retinues and hospitality, of noblemen and
gentlemen, received into custom, doth much conduce unto martial greatness.
Whereas, contrariwise, the close and reserved living of noblemen and
gentlemen, causeth a penury of military forces.</p>
<p>By all means it is to be procured, that the trunk of Nebuchadnezzar's tree
of monarchy, be great enough to bear the branches and the boughs; that is,
that the natural subjects of the crown or state, bear a sufficient
proportion to the stranger subjects, that they govern. Therefore all
states that are liberal of naturalization towards strangers, are fit for
empire. For to think that an handful of people can, with the greatest
courage and policy in the world, embrace too large extent of dominion, it
may hold for a time, but it will fail suddenly. The Spartans were a nice
people in point of naturalization; whereby, while they kept their compass,
they stood firm; but when they did spread, and their boughs were becomen
too great for their stem, they became a windfall, upon the sudden. Never
any state was in this point so open to receive strangers into their body,
as were the Romans. Therefore it sorted with them accordingly; for they
grew to the greatest monarchy. Their manner was to grant naturalization
(which they called jus civitatis), and to grant it in the highest degree;
that is, not only jus commercii, jus connubii, jus haereditatis; but also
jus suffragii, and jus honorum. And this not to singular persons alone,
but likewise to whole families; yea to cities, and sometimes to nations.
Add to this their custom of plantation of colonies; whereby the Roman
plant was removed into the soil of other nations. And putting both
constitutions together, you will say that it was not the Romans that
spread upon the world, but it was the world that spread upon the Romans;
and that was the sure way of greatness. I have marvelled, sometimes, at
Spain, how they clasp and contain so large dominions, with so few natural
Spaniards; but sure the whole compass of Spain, is a very great body of a
tree; far above Rome and Sparta at the first. And besides, though they
have not had that usage, to naturalize liberally, yet they have that which
is next to it; that is, to employ, almost indifferently, all nations in
their militia of ordinary soldiers; yea, and sometimes in their highest
commands. Nay, it seemeth at this instant they are sensible, of this want
of natives; as by the Pragmatical Sanction, now published, appeareth.</p>
<p>It is certain that sedentary, and within-door arts, and delicate
manufactures (that require rather the finger than the arm), have, in their
nature, a contrariety to a military disposition. And generally, all
warlike people are a little idle, and love danger better than travail.
Neither must they be too much broken of it, if they shall be preserved in
vigor. Therefore it was great advantage, in the ancient states of Sparta,
Athens, Rome, and others, that they had the use of slaves, which commonly
did rid those manufactures. But that is abolished, in greatest part, by
the Christian law. That which cometh nearest to it, is to leave those arts
chiefly to strangers (which, for that purpose, are the more easily to be
received), and to contain the principal bulk of the vulgar natives, within
those three kinds,—tillers of the ground; free servants; and
handicraftsmen of strong and manly arts, as smiths, masons, carpenters,
etc.; not reckoning professed soldiers.</p>
<p>But above all, for empire and greatness, it importeth most, that a nation
do profess arms, as their principal honor, study, and occupation. For the
things which we formerly have spoken of, are but habilitations towards
arms; and what is habilitation without intention and act? Romulus, after
his death (as they report or feign), sent a present to the Romans, that
above all, they should intend arms; and then they should prove the
greatest empire of the world. The fabric of the state of Sparta was wholly
(though not wisely) framed and composed, to that scope and end. The
Persians and Macedonians had it for a flash. The Gauls, Germans, Goths,
Saxons, Normans, and others, had it for a time. The Turks have it at this
day, though in great declination. Of Christian Europe, they that have it
are, in effect, only the Spaniards. But it is so plain, that every man
profiteth in that, he most intendeth, that it needeth not to be stood
upon. It is enough to point at it; that no nation which doth not directly
profess arms, may look to have greatness fall into their mouths. And on
the other side, it is a most certain oracle of time, that those states
that continue long in that profession (as the Romans and Turks principally
have done) do wonders. And those that have professed arms but for an age,
have, notwithstanding, commonly attained that greatness, in that age,
which maintained them long after, when their profession and exercise of
arms hath grown to decay.</p>
<p>Incident to this point is, for a state to have those laws or customs,
which may reach forth unto them just occasions (as may be pretended) of
war. For there is that justice, imprinted in the nature of men, that they
enter not upon wars (whereof so many calamities do ensue) but upon some,
at the least specious, grounds and quarrels. The Turk hath at hand, for
cause of war, the propagation of his law or sect; a quarrel that he may
always command. The Romans, though they esteemed the extending the limits
of their empire, to be great honor to their generals, when it was done,
yet they never rested upon that alone, to begin a war. First, therefore,
let nations that pretend to greatness have this; that they be sensible of
wrongs, either upon borderers, merchants, or politic ministers; and that
they sit not too long upon a provocation. Secondly, let them be prest, and
ready to give aids and succors, to their confederates; as it ever was with
the Romans; insomuch, as if the confederate had leagues defensive, with
divers other states, and, upon invasion offered, did implore their aids
severally, yet the Romans would ever be the foremost, and leave it to none
other to have the honor. As for the wars which were anciently made, on the
behalf of a kind of party, or tacit conformity of estate, I do not see how
they may be well justified: as when the Romans made a war, for the liberty
of Grecia; or when the Lacedaemonians and Athenians, made wars to set up
or pull down democracies and oligarchies; or when wars were made by
foreigners, under the pretence of justice or protection, to deliver the
subjects of others, from tyranny and oppression; and the like. Let it
suffice, that no estate expect to be great, that is not awake upon any
just occasion of arming.</p>
<p>No body can be healthful without exercise, neither natural body nor
politic; and certainly to a kingdom or estate, a just and honorable war,
is the true exercise. A civil war, indeed, is like the heat of a fever;
but a foreign war is like the heat of exercise, and serveth to keep the
body in health; for in a slothful peace, both courages will effeminate,
and manners corrupt. But howsoever it be for happiness, without all
question, for greatness, it maketh to be still for the most part in arms;
and the strength of a veteran army (though it be a chargeable business)
always on foot, is that which commonly giveth the law, or at least the
reputation, amongst all neighbor states; as may well be seen in Spain,
which hath had, in one part or other, a veteran army almost continually,
now by the space of six score years.</p>
<p>To be master of the sea, is an abridgment of a monarchy. Cicero, writing
to Atticus of Pompey his preparation against Caesar, saith, Consilium
Pompeii plane Themistocleum est; putat enim, qui mari potitur, eum rerum
potiri. And, without doubt, Pompey had tired out Caesar, if upon vain
confidence, he had not left that way. We see the great effects of battles
by sea. The battle of Actium, decided the empire of the world. The battle
of Lepanto, arrested the greatness of the Turk. There be many examples,
where sea-fights have been final to the war; but this is when princes or
states have set up their rest, upon the battles. But thus much is certain,
that he that commands the sea, is at great liberty, and may take as much,
and as little, of the war as he will. Whereas those that be strongest by
land, are many times nevertheless in great straits. Surely, at this day,
with us of Europe, the vantage of strength at sea (which is one of the
principal dowries of this kingdom of Great Britain) is great; both because
most of the kingdoms of Europe, are not merely inland, but girt with the
sea most part of their compass; and because the wealth of both Indies
seems in great part, but an accessory to the command of the seas.</p>
<p>The wars of latter ages seem to be made in the dark, in respect of the
glory, and honor, which reflected upon men from the wars, in ancient time.
There be now, for martial encouragement, some degrees and orders of
chivalry; which nevertheless are conferred promiscuously, upon soldiers
and no soldiers; and some remembrance perhaps, upon the scutcheon; and
some hospitals for maimed soldiers; and such like things. But in ancient
times, the trophies erected upon the place of the victory; the funeral
laudatives and monuments for those that died in the wars; the crowns and
garlands personal; the style of emperor, which the great kings of the
world after borrowed; the triumphs of the generals, upon their return; the
great donatives and largesses, upon the disbanding of the armies; were
things able to inflame all men's courages. But above all, that of the
triumph, amongst the Romans, was not pageants or gaudery, but one of the
wisest and noblest institutions, that ever was. For it contained three
things: honor to the general; riches to the treasury out of the spoils;
and donatives to the army. But that honor, perhaps were not fit for
monarchies; except it be in the person of the monarch himself, or his
sons; as it came to pass in the times of the Roman emperors, who did
impropriate the actual triumphs to themselves, and their sons, for such
wars as they did achieve in person; and left only, for wars achieved by
subjects, some triumphal garments and ensigns to the general.</p>
<p>To conclude: no man can by care taking (as the Scripture saith) add a
cubit to his stature, in this little model of a man's body; but in the
great frame of kingdoms and commonwealths, it is in the power of princes
or estates, to add amplitude and greatness to their kingdoms; for by
introducing such ordinances, constitutions, and customs, as we have now
touched, they may sow greatness to their posterity and succession. But
these things are commonly not observed, but left to take their chance.</p>
<p><SPAN name="link2H_4_0030" id="link2H_4_0030"></SPAN></p>
<h2> Of Regiment Of Health </h2>
<p>THERE is a wisdom in this; beyond the rules of physic: a man's own
observation, what he finds good of, and what he finds hurt of, is the best
physic to preserve health. But it is a safer conclusion to say, This
agreeth not well with me, therefore, I will not continue it; than this, I
find no offence of this, therefore I may use it. For strength of nature in
youth, passeth over many excesses, which are owing a man till his age.
Discern of the coming on of years, and think not to do the same things
still; for age will not be defied. Beware of sudden change, in any great
point of diet, and, if necessity enforce it, fit the rest to it. For it is
a secret both in nature and state, that it is safer to change many things,
than one. Examine thy customs of diet, sleep, exercise, apparel, and the
like; and try, in any thing thou shalt judge hurtful, to discontinue it,
by little and little; but so, as if thou dost find any inconvenience by
the change, thou come back to it again: for it is hard to distinguish that
which is generally held good and wholesome, from that which is good
particularly, and fit for thine own body. To be free-minded and cheerfully
disposed, at hours of meat, and of sleep, and of exercise, is one of the
best precepts of long lasting. As for the passions, and studies of the
mind; avoid envy, anxious fears; anger fretting inwards; subtle and knotty
inquisitions; joys and exhilarations in excess; sadness not communicated.
Entertain hopes; mirth rather than joy; variety of delights, rather than
surfeit of them; wonder and admiration, and therefore novelties; studies
that fill the mind with splendid and illustrious objects, as histories,
fables, and contemplations of nature. If you fly physic in health
altogether, it will be too strange for your body, when you shall need it.
If you make it too familiar, it will work no extraordinary effect, when
sickness cometh. I commend rather some diet for certain seasons, than
frequent use of physic, except it be grown into a custom. For those diets
alter the body more, and trouble it less. Despise no new accident in your
body, but ask opinion of it. In sickness, respect health principally; and
in health, action. For those that put their bodies to endure in health,
may in most sicknesses, which are not very sharp, be cured only with diet,
and tendering. Celsus could never have spoken it as a physician, had he
not been a wise man withal, when he giveth it for one of the great
precepts of health and lasting, that a man do vary, and interchange
contraries, but with an inclination to the more benign extreme: use
fasting and full eating, but rather full eating; watching and sleep, but
rather sleep; sitting and exercise, but rather exercise; and the like. So
shall nature be cherished, and yet taught masteries. Physicians are, some
of them, so pleasing and conformable to the humor of the patient, as they
press not the true cure of the disease; and some other are so regular, in
proceeding according to art for the disease, as they respect not
sufficiently the condition of the patient. Take one of a middle temper; or
if it may not be found in one man, combine two of either sort; and forget
not to call as well, the best acquainted with your body, as the best
reputed of for his faculty.</p>
<p><SPAN name="link2H_4_0031" id="link2H_4_0031"></SPAN></p>
<h2> Of Suspicion </h2>
<p>SUSPICIONS amongst thoughts, are like bats amongst birds, they ever fly by
twilight. Certainly they are to be repressed, or at least well guarded:
for they cloud the mind; they leese friends; and they check with business,
whereby business cannot go on currently and constantly. They dispose kings
to tyranny, husbands to jealousy, wise men to irresolution and melancholy.
They are defects, not in the heart, but in the brain; for they take place
in the stoutest natures; as in the example of Henry the Seventh of
England. There was not a more suspicious man, nor a more stout. And in
such a composition they do small hurt. For commonly they are not admitted,
but with examination, whether they be likely or no. But in fearful natures
they gain ground too fast. There is nothing makes a man suspect much, more
than to know little; and therefore men should remedy suspicion, by
procuring to know more, and not to keep their suspicions in smother. What
would men have? Do they think, those they employ and deal with, are
saints? Do they not think, they will have their own ends, and be truer to
themselves, than to them? Therefore there is no better way, to moderate
suspicions, than to account upon such suspicions as true, and yet to
bridle them as false. For so far a man ought to make use of suspicions, as
to provide, as if that should be true, that he suspects, yet it may do him
no hurt. Suspicions that the mind of itself gathers, are but buzzes; but
suspicions that are artificially nourished, and put into men's heads, by
the tales and whisperings of others, have stings. Certainly, the best
mean, to clear the way in this same wood of suspicions, is frankly to
communicate them with the party, that he suspects; for thereby he shall be
sure to know more of the truth of them, than he did before; and withal
shall make that party more circumspect, not to give further cause of
suspicion. But this would not be done to men of base natures; for they, if
they find themselves once suspected, will never be true. The Italian says,
Sospetto licentia fede; as if suspicion, did give a passport to faith; but
it ought, rather, to kindle it to discharge itself.</p>
<p><SPAN name="link2H_4_0032" id="link2H_4_0032"></SPAN></p>
<h2> Of Discourse </h2>
<p>SOME, in their discourse, desire rather commendation of wit, in being able
to hold all arguments, than of judgment, in discerning what is true; as if
it were a praise, to know what might be said, and not, what should be
thought. Some have certain common places, and themes, wherein they are
good and want variety; which kind of poverty is for the most part tedious,
and when it is once perceived, ridiculous. The honorablest part of talk,
is to give the occasion; and again to moderate, and pass to somewhat else;
for then a man leads the dance. It is good, in discourse and speech of
conversation, to vary and intermingle speech of the present occasion, with
arguments, tales with reasons, asking of questions, with telling of
opinions, and jest with earnest: for it is a dull thing to tire, and, as
we say now, to jade, any thing too far. As for jest, there be certain
things, which ought to be privileged from it; namely, religion, matters of
state, great persons, any man's present business of importance, and any
case that deserveth pity. Yet there be some, that think their wits have
been asleep, except they dart out somewhat that is piquant, and to the
quick. That is a vein which would be bridled:</p>
<p>Parce, puer, stimulis, et fortius utere loris.</p>
<p>And generally, men ought to find the difference, between saltness and
bitterness. Certainly, he that hath a satirical vein, as he maketh others
afraid of his wit, so he had need be afraid of others' memory. He that
questioneth much, shall learn much, and content much; but especially, if
he apply his questions to the skill of the persons whom he asketh; for he
shall give them occasion, to please themselves in speaking, and himself
shall continually gather knowledge. But let his questions not be
troublesome; for that is fit for a poser. And let him be sure to leave
other men, their turns to speak. Nay, if there be any, that would reign
and take up all the time, let him find means to take them off, and to
bring others on; as musicians use to do, with those that dance too long
galliards. If you dissemble, sometimes, your knowledge of that you are
thought to know, you shall be thought, another time, to know that you know
not. Speech of a man's self ought to be seldom, and well chosen. I knew
one, was wont to say in scorn, He must needs be a wise man, he speaks so
much of himself: and there is but one case, wherein a man may commend
himself with good grace; and that is in commending virtue in another;
especially if it be such a virtue, whereunto himself pretendeth. Speech of
touch towards others, should be sparingly used; for discourse ought to be
as a field, without coming home to any man. I knew two noblemen, of the
west part of England, whereof the one was given to scoff, but kept ever
royal cheer in his house; the other would ask, of those that had been at
the other's table, Tell truly, was there never a flout or dry blow given?
To which the guest would answer, Such and such a thing passed. The lord
would say, I thought, he would mar a good dinner. Discretion of speech, is
more than eloquence; and to speak agreeably to him, with whom we deal, is
more than to speak in good words, or in good order. A good continued
speech, without a good speech of interlocution, shows slowness: and a good
reply or second speech, without a good settled speech, showeth shallowness
and weakness. As we see in beasts, that those that are weakest in the
course, are yet nimblest in the turn; as it is betwixt the greyhound and
the hare. To use too many circumstances, ere one come to the matter, is
wearisome; to use none at all, is blunt.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />