<p>As with our colleges, so with a hundred "modern improvements"; there is an
illusion about them; there is not always a positive advance. The devil
goes on exacting compound interest to the last for his early share and
numerous succeeding investments in them. Our inventions are wont to be
pretty toys, which distract our attention from serious things. They are
but improved means to an unimproved end, an end which it was already but
too easy to arrive at; as railroads lead to Boston or New York. We are in
great haste to construct a magnetic telegraph from Maine to Texas; but
Maine and Texas, it may be, have nothing important to communicate. Either
is in such a predicament as the man who was earnest to be introduced to a
distinguished deaf woman, but when he was presented, and one end of her
ear trumpet was put into his hand, had nothing to say. As if the main
object were to talk fast and not to talk sensibly. We are eager to tunnel
under the Atlantic and bring the Old World some weeks nearer to the New;
but perchance the first news that will leak through into the broad,
flapping American ear will be that the Princess Adelaide has the whooping
cough. After all, the man whose horse trots a mile in a minute does not
carry the most important messages; he is not an evangelist, nor does he
come round eating locusts and wild honey. I doubt if Flying Childers ever
carried a peck of corn to mill.</p>
<p>One says to me, "I wonder that you do not lay up money; you love to
travel; you might take the cars and go to Fitchburg today and see the
country." But I am wiser than that. I have learned that the swiftest
traveller is he that goes afoot. I say to my friend, Suppose we try who
will get there first. The distance is thirty miles; the fare ninety cents.
That is almost a day's wages. I remember when wages were sixty cents a day
for laborers on this very road. Well, I start now on foot, and get there
before night; I have travelled at that rate by the week together. You will
in the meanwhile have earned your fare, and arrive there some time
tomorrow, or possibly this evening, if you are lucky enough to get a job
in season. Instead of going to Fitchburg, you will be working here the
greater part of the day. And so, if the railroad reached round the world,
I think that I should keep ahead of you; and as for seeing the country and
getting experience of that kind, I should have to cut your acquaintance
altogether.</p>
<p>Such is the universal law, which no man can ever outwit, and with regard
to the railroad even we may say it is as broad as it is long. To make a
railroad round the world available to all mankind is equivalent to grading
the whole surface of the planet. Men have an indistinct notion that if
they keep up this activity of joint stocks and spades long enough all will
at length ride somewhere, in next to no time, and for nothing; but though
a crowd rushes to the depot, and the conductor shouts "All aboard!" when
the smoke is blown away and the vapor condensed, it will be perceived that
a few are riding, but the rest are run over—and it will be called,
and will be, "A melancholy accident." No doubt they can ride at last who
shall have earned their fare, that is, if they survive so long, but they
will probably have lost their elasticity and desire to travel by that
time. This spending of the best part of one's life earning money in order
to enjoy a questionable liberty during the least valuable part of it
reminds me of the Englishman who went to India to make a fortune first, in
order that he might return to England and live the life of a poet. He
should have gone up garret at once. "What!" exclaim a million Irishmen
starting up from all the shanties in the land, "is not this railroad which
we have built a good thing?" Yes, I answer, comparatively good, that is,
you might have done worse; but I wish, as you are brothers of mine, that
you could have spent your time better than digging in this dirt.</p>
<p><br/></p>
<p>Before I finished my house, wishing to earn ten or twelve dollars by some
honest and agreeable method, in order to meet my unusual expenses, I
planted about two acres and a half of light and sandy soil near it chiefly
with beans, but also a small part with potatoes, corn, peas, and turnips.
The whole lot contains eleven acres, mostly growing up to pines and
hickories, and was sold the preceding season for eight dollars and eight
cents an acre. One farmer said that it was "good for nothing but to raise
cheeping squirrels on." I put no manure whatever on this land, not being
the owner, but merely a squatter, and not expecting to cultivate so much
again, and I did not quite hoe it all once. I got out several cords of
stumps in plowing, which supplied me with fuel for a long time, and left
small circles of virgin mould, easily distinguishable through the summer
by the greater luxuriance of the beans there. The dead and for the most
part unmerchantable wood behind my house, and the driftwood from the pond,
have supplied the remainder of my fuel. I was obliged to hire a team and a
man for the plowing, though I held the plow myself. My farm outgoes for
the first season were, for implements, seed, work, etc., $14.72-1/2. The
seed corn was given me. This never costs anything to speak of, unless you
plant more than enough. I got twelve bushels of beans, and eighteen
bushels of potatoes, beside some peas and sweet corn. The yellow corn and
turnips were too late to come to anything. My whole income from the farm
was</p>
<p>$ 23.44<br/>
Deducting the outgoes............ 14.72-1/2<br/>
————<br/>
There are left.................. $ 8.71-1/2<br/></p>
<p class="nind">
beside produce consumed and on hand at the time this estimate was made of
the value of $4.50—the amount on hand much more than balancing a
little grass which I did not raise. All things considered, that is,
considering the importance of a man's soul and of today, notwithstanding
the short time occupied by my experiment, nay, partly even because of its
transient character, I believe that that was doing better than any farmer
in Concord did that year.</p>
<p>The next year I did better still, for I spaded up all the land which I
required, about a third of an acre, and I learned from the experience of
both years, not being in the least awed by many celebrated works on
husbandry, Arthur Young among the rest, that if one would live simply and
eat only the crop which he raised, and raise no more than he ate, and not
exchange it for an insufficient quantity of more luxurious and expensive
things, he would need to cultivate only a few rods of ground, and that it
would be cheaper to spade up that than to use oxen to plow it, and to
select a fresh spot from time to time than to manure the old, and he could
do all his necessary farm work as it were with his left hand at odd hours
in the summer; and thus he would not be tied to an ox, or horse, or cow,
or pig, as at present. I desire to speak impartially on this point, and as
one not interested in the success or failure of the present economical and
social arrangements. I was more independent than any farmer in Concord,
for I was not anchored to a house or farm, but could follow the bent of my
genius, which is a very crooked one, every moment. Beside being better off
than they already, if my house had been burned or my crops had failed, I
should have been nearly as well off as before.</p>
<p>I am wont to think that men are not so much the keepers of herds as herds
are the keepers of men, the former are so much the freer. Men and oxen
exchange work; but if we consider necessary work only, the oxen will be
seen to have greatly the advantage, their farm is so much the larger. Man
does some of his part of the exchange work in his six weeks of haying, and
it is no boy's play. Certainly no nation that lived simply in all
respects, that is, no nation of philosophers, would commit so great a
blunder as to use the labor of animals. True, there never was and is not
likely soon to be a nation of philosophers, nor am I certain it is
desirable that there should be. However, <i>I</i> should never have broken
a horse or bull and taken him to board for any work he might do for me,
for fear I should become a horseman or a herdsman merely; and if society
seems to be the gainer by so doing, are we certain that what is one man's
gain is not another's loss, and that the stable-boy has equal cause with
his master to be satisfied? Granted that some public works would not have
been constructed without this aid, and let man share the glory of such
with the ox and horse; does it follow that he could not have accomplished
works yet more worthy of himself in that case? When men begin to do, not
merely unnecessary or artistic, but luxurious and idle work, with their
assistance, it is inevitable that a few do all the exchange work with the
oxen, or, in other words, become the slaves of the strongest. Man thus not
only works for the animal within him, but, for a symbol of this, he works
for the animal without him. Though we have many substantial houses of
brick or stone, the prosperity of the farmer is still measured by the
degree to which the barn overshadows the house. This town is said to have
the largest houses for oxen, cows, and horses hereabouts, and it is not
behindhand in its public buildings; but there are very few halls for free
worship or free speech in this county. It should not be by their
architecture, but why not even by their power of abstract thought, that
nations should seek to commemorate themselves? How much more admirable the
Bhagvat-Geeta than all the ruins of the East! Towers and temples are the
luxury of princes. A simple and independent mind does not toil at the
bidding of any prince. Genius is not a retainer to any emperor, nor is its
material silver, or gold, or marble, except to a trifling extent. To what
end, pray, is so much stone hammered? In Arcadia, when I was there, I did
not see any hammering stone. Nations are possessed with an insane ambition
to perpetuate the memory of themselves by the amount of hammered stone
they leave. What if equal pains were taken to smooth and polish their
manners? One piece of good sense would be more memorable than a monument
as high as the moon. I love better to see stones in place. The grandeur of
Thebes was a vulgar grandeur. More sensible is a rod of stone wall that
bounds an honest man's field than a hundred-gated Thebes that has wandered
farther from the true end of life. The religion and civilization which are
barbaric and heathenish build splendid temples; but what you might call
Christianity does not. Most of the stone a nation hammers goes toward its
tomb only. It buries itself alive. As for the Pyramids, there is nothing
to wonder at in them so much as the fact that so many men could be found
degraded enough to spend their lives constructing a tomb for some
ambitious booby, whom it would have been wiser and manlier to have drowned
in the Nile, and then given his body to the dogs. I might possibly invent
some excuse for them and him, but I have no time for it. As for the
religion and love of art of the builders, it is much the same all the
world over, whether the building be an Egyptian temple or the United
States Bank. It costs more than it comes to. The mainspring is vanity,
assisted by the love of garlic and bread and butter. Mr. Balcom, a
promising young architect, designs it on the back of his Vitruvius, with
hard pencil and ruler, and the job is let out to Dobson & Sons,
stonecutters. When the thirty centuries begin to look down on it, mankind
begin to look up at it. As for your high towers and monuments, there was a
crazy fellow once in this town who undertook to dig through to China, and
he got so far that, as he said, he heard the Chinese pots and kettles
rattle; but I think that I shall not go out of my way to admire the hole
which he made. Many are concerned about the monuments of the West and the
East—to know who built them. For my part, I should like to know who
in those days did not build them—who were above such trifling. But
to proceed with my statistics.</p>
<p>By surveying, carpentry, and day-labor of various other kinds in the
village in the meanwhile, for I have as many trades as fingers, I had
earned $13.34. The expense of food for eight months, namely, from July 4th
to March 1st, the time when these estimates were made, though I lived
there more than two years—not counting potatoes, a little green
corn, and some peas, which I had raised, nor considering the value of what
was on hand at the last date—was</p>
<p>Rice.................... $ 1.73-1/2<br/>
Molasses................. 1.73 Cheapest form of the<br/>
saccharine.<br/>
Rye meal................. 1.04-3/4<br/>
Indian meal.............. 0.99-3/4 Cheaper than rye.<br/>
Pork..................... 0.22<br/>
All experiments which failed:<br/>
Flour.................... 0.88 Costs more than Indian meal,<br/>
both money and trouble.<br/>
Sugar.................... 0.80<br/>
Lard..................... 0.65<br/>
Apples................... 0.25<br/>
Dried apple.............. 0.22<br/>
Sweet potatoes........... 0.10<br/>
One pumpkin.............. 0.06<br/>
One watermelon........... 0.02<br/>
Salt..................... 0.03<br/></p>
<p class="nind">
Yes, I did eat $8.74, all told; but I should not thus unblushingly publish
my guilt, if I did not know that most of my readers were equally guilty
with myself, and that their deeds would look no better in print. The next
year I sometimes caught a mess of fish for my dinner, and once I went so
far as to slaughter a woodchuck which ravaged my bean-field—effect
his transmigration, as a Tartar would say—and devour him, partly for
experiment's sake; but though it afforded me a momentary enjoyment,
notwithstanding a musky flavor, I saw that the longest use would not make
that a good practice, however it might seem to have your woodchucks ready
dressed by the village butcher.</p>
<p>Clothing and some incidental expenses within the same dates, though little
can be inferred from this item, amounted to</p>
<p>$8.40-3/4<br/>
Oil and some household utensils........ 2.00<br/></p>
<p class="nind">
So that all the pecuniary outgoes, excepting for washing and mending,
which for the most part were done out of the house, and their bills have
not yet been received—and these are all and more than all the ways
by which money necessarily goes out in this part of the world—were</p>
<p>House................................. $ 28.12-1/2<br/>
Farm one year........................... 14.72-1/2<br/>
Food eight months....................... 8.74<br/>
Clothing, etc., eight months............ 8.40-3/4<br/>
Oil, etc., eight months................. 2.00<br/>
——————<br/>
In all............................ $ 61.99-3/4<br/></p>
<p class="nind">
I address myself now to those of my readers who have a living to get. And
to meet this I have for farm produce sold</p>
<p>$23.44<br/>
Earned by day-labor.................... 13.34<br/>
————<br/>
In all............................. $36.78,<br/></p>
<p class="nind">
which subtracted from the sum of the outgoes leaves a balance of
$25.21-3/4 on the one side—this being very nearly the means with
which I started, and the measure of expenses to be incurred—and on
the other, beside the leisure and independence and health thus secured, a
comfortable house for me as long as I choose to occupy it.</p>
<p>These statistics, however accidental and therefore uninstructive they may
appear, as they have a certain completeness, have a certain value also.
Nothing was given me of which I have not rendered some account. It appears
from the above estimate, that my food alone cost me in money about
twenty-seven cents a week. It was, for nearly two years after this, rye
and Indian meal without yeast, potatoes, rice, a very little salt pork,
molasses, and salt; and my drink, water. It was fit that I should live on
rice, mainly, who love so well the philosophy of India. To meet the
objections of some inveterate cavillers, I may as well state, that if I
dined out occasionally, as I always had done, and I trust shall have
opportunities to do again, it was frequently to the detriment of my
domestic arrangements. But the dining out, being, as I have stated, a
constant element, does not in the least affect a comparative statement
like this.</p>
<p>I learned from my two years' experience that it would cost incredibly
little trouble to obtain one's necessary food, even in this latitude; that
a man may use as simple a diet as the animals, and yet retain health and
strength. I have made a satisfactory dinner, satisfactory on several
accounts, simply off a dish of purslane (<i>Portulaca oleracea</i>) which
I gathered in my cornfield, boiled and salted. I give the Latin on account
of the savoriness of the trivial name. And pray what more can a reasonable
man desire, in peaceful times, in ordinary noons, than a sufficient number
of ears of green sweet corn boiled, with the addition of salt? Even the
little variety which I used was a yielding to the demands of appetite, and
not of health. Yet men have come to such a pass that they frequently
starve, not for want of necessaries, but for want of luxuries; and I know
a good woman who thinks that her son lost his life because he took to
drinking water only.</p>
<p>The reader will perceive that I am treating the subject rather from an
economic than a dietetic point of view, and he will not venture to put my
abstemiousness to the test unless he has a well-stocked larder.</p>
<p>Bread I at first made of pure Indian meal and salt, genuine hoe-cakes,
which I baked before my fire out of doors on a shingle or the end of a
stick of timber sawed off in building my house; but it was wont to get
smoked and to have a piny flavor. I tried flour also; but have at last
found a mixture of rye and Indian meal most convenient and agreeable. In
cold weather it was no little amusement to bake several small loaves of
this in succession, tending and turning them as carefully as an Egyptian
his hatching eggs. They were a real cereal fruit which I ripened, and they
had to my senses a fragrance like that of other noble fruits, which I kept
in as long as possible by wrapping them in cloths. I made a study of the
ancient and indispensable art of bread-making, consulting such authorities
as offered, going back to the primitive days and first invention of the
unleavened kind, when from the wildness of nuts and meats men first
reached the mildness and refinement of this diet, and travelling gradually
down in my studies through that accidental souring of the dough which, it
is supposed, taught the leavening process, and through the various
fermentations thereafter, till I came to "good, sweet, wholesome bread,"
the staff of life. Leaven, which some deem the soul of bread, the <i>spiritus</i>
which fills its cellular tissue, which is religiously preserved like the
vestal fire—some precious bottleful, I suppose, first brought over
in the Mayflower, did the business for America, and its influence is still
rising, swelling, spreading, in cerealian billows over the land—this
seed I regularly and faithfully procured from the village, till at length
one morning I forgot the rules, and scalded my yeast; by which accident I
discovered that even this was not indispensable—for my discoveries
were not by the synthetic but analytic process—and I have gladly
omitted it since, though most housewives earnestly assured me that safe
and wholesome bread without yeast might not be, and elderly people
prophesied a speedy decay of the vital forces. Yet I find it not to be an
essential ingredient, and after going without it for a year am still in
the land of the living; and I am glad to escape the trivialness of
carrying a bottleful in my pocket, which would sometimes pop and discharge
its contents to my discomfiture. It is simpler and more respectable to
omit it. Man is an animal who more than any other can adapt himself to all
climates and circumstances. Neither did I put any sal-soda, or other acid
or alkali, into my bread. It would seem that I made it according to the
recipe which Marcus Porcius Cato gave about two centuries before Christ.
"Panem depsticium sic facito. Manus mortariumque bene lavato. Farinam in
mortarium indito, aquae paulatim addito, subigitoque pulchre. Ubi bene
subegeris, defingito, coquitoque sub testu." Which I take to mean,—"Make
kneaded bread thus. Wash your hands and trough well. Put the meal into the
trough, add water gradually, and knead it thoroughly. When you have
kneaded it well, mould it, and bake it under a cover," that is, in a
baking kettle. Not a word about leaven. But I did not always use this
staff of life. At one time, owing to the emptiness of my purse, I saw none
of it for more than a month.</p>
<p>Every New Englander might easily raise all his own breadstuffs in this
land of rye and Indian corn, and not depend on distant and fluctuating
markets for them. Yet so far are we from simplicity and independence that,
in Concord, fresh and sweet meal is rarely sold in the shops, and hominy
and corn in a still coarser form are hardly used by any. For the most part
the farmer gives to his cattle and hogs the grain of his own producing,
and buys flour, which is at least no more wholesome, at a greater cost, at
the store. I saw that I could easily raise my bushel or two of rye and
Indian corn, for the former will grow on the poorest land, and the latter
does not require the best, and grind them in a hand-mill, and so do
without rice and pork; and if I must have some concentrated sweet, I found
by experiment that I could make a very good molasses either of pumpkins or
beets, and I knew that I needed only to set out a few maples to obtain it
more easily still, and while these were growing I could use various
substitutes beside those which I have named. "For," as the Forefathers
sang,—</p>
<p>"we can make liquor to sweeten our lips<br/>
Of pumpkins and parsnips and walnut-tree chips."<br/></p>
<p class="nind">
Finally, as for salt, that grossest of groceries, to obtain this might be
a fit occasion for a visit to the seashore, or, if I did without it
altogether, I should probably drink the less water. I do not learn that
the Indians ever troubled themselves to go after it.</p>
<p>Thus I could avoid all trade and barter, so far as my food was concerned,
and having a shelter already, it would only remain to get clothing and
fuel. The pantaloons which I now wear were woven in a farmer's family—thank
Heaven there is so much virtue still in man; for I think the fall from the
farmer to the operative as great and memorable as that from the man to the
farmer;—and in a new country, fuel is an encumbrance. As for a
habitat, if I were not permitted still to squat, I might purchase one acre
at the same price for which the land I cultivated was sold—namely,
eight dollars and eight cents. But as it was, I considered that I enhanced
the value of the land by squatting on it.</p>
<p>There is a certain class of unbelievers who sometimes ask me such
questions as, if I think that I can live on vegetable food alone; and to
strike at the root of the matter at once—for the root is faith—I
am accustomed to answer such, that I can live on board nails. If they
cannot understand that, they cannot understand much that I have to say.
For my part, I am glad to hear of experiments of this kind being tried; as
that a young man tried for a fortnight to live on hard, raw corn on the
ear, using his teeth for all mortar. The squirrel tribe tried the same and
succeeded. The human race is interested in these experiments, though a few
old women who are incapacitated for them, or who own their thirds in
mills, may be alarmed.</p>
<p><br/></p>
<p>My furniture, part of which I made myself—and the rest cost me
nothing of which I have not rendered an account—consisted of a bed,
a table, a desk, three chairs, a looking-glass three inches in diameter, a
pair of tongs and andirons, a kettle, a skillet, and a frying-pan, a
dipper, a wash-bowl, two knives and forks, three plates, one cup, one
spoon, a jug for oil, a jug for molasses, and a japanned lamp. None is so
poor that he need sit on a pumpkin. That is shiftlessness. There is a
plenty of such chairs as I like best in the village garrets to be had for
taking them away. Furniture! Thank God, I can sit and I can stand without
the aid of a furniture warehouse. What man but a philosopher would not be
ashamed to see his furniture packed in a cart and going up country exposed
to the light of heaven and the eyes of men, a beggarly account of empty
boxes? That is Spaulding's furniture. I could never tell from inspecting
such a load whether it belonged to a so-called rich man or a poor one; the
owner always seemed poverty-stricken. Indeed, the more you have of such
things the poorer you are. Each load looks as if it contained the contents
of a dozen shanties; and if one shanty is poor, this is a dozen times as
poor. Pray, for what do we <i>move</i> ever but to get rid of our
furniture, our <i>exuviœ</i>: at last to go from this world to
another newly furnished, and leave this to be burned? It is the same as if
all these traps were buckled to a man's belt, and he could not move over
the rough country where our lines are cast without dragging them—dragging
his trap. He was a lucky fox that left his tail in the trap. The muskrat
will gnaw his third leg off to be free. No wonder man has lost his
elasticity. How often he is at a dead set! "Sir, if I may be so bold, what
do you mean by a dead set?" If you are a seer, whenever you meet a man you
will see all that he owns, ay, and much that he pretends to disown, behind
him, even to his kitchen furniture and all the trumpery which he saves and
will not burn, and he will appear to be harnessed to it and making what
headway he can. I think that the man is at a dead set who has got through
a knot-hole or gateway where his sledge load of furniture cannot follow
him. I cannot but feel compassion when I hear some trig, compact-looking
man, seemingly free, all girded and ready, speak of his "furniture," as
whether it is insured or not. "But what shall I do with my furniture?"—My
gay butterfly is entangled in a spider's web then. Even those who seem for
a long while not to have any, if you inquire more narrowly you will find
have some stored in somebody's barn. I look upon England today as an old
gentleman who is travelling with a great deal of baggage, trumpery which
has accumulated from long housekeeping, which he has not the courage to
burn; great trunk, little trunk, bandbox, and bundle. Throw away the first
three at least. It would surpass the powers of a well man nowadays to take
up his bed and walk, and I should certainly advise a sick one to lay down
his bed and run. When I have met an immigrant tottering under a bundle
which contained his all—looking like an enormous wen which had grown
out of the nape of his neck—I have pitied him, not because that was
his all, but because he had all <i>that</i> to carry. If I have got to
drag my trap, I will take care that it be a light one and do not nip me in
a vital part. But perchance it would be wisest never to put one's paw into
it.</p>
<p>I would observe, by the way, that it costs me nothing for curtains, for I
have no gazers to shut out but the sun and moon, and I am willing that
they should look in. The moon will not sour milk nor taint meat of mine,
nor will the sun injure my furniture or fade my carpet; and if he is
sometimes too warm a friend, I find it still better economy to retreat
behind some curtain which nature has provided, than to add a single item
to the details of housekeeping. A lady once offered me a mat, but as I had
no room to spare within the house, nor time to spare within or without to
shake it, I declined it, preferring to wipe my feet on the sod before my
door. It is best to avoid the beginnings of evil.</p>
<p>Not long since I was present at the auction of a deacon's effects, for his
life had not been ineffectual:—</p>
<p>"The evil that men do lives after them."<br/></p>
<p class="nind">
As usual, a great proportion was trumpery which had begun to accumulate in
his father's day. Among the rest was a dried tapeworm. And now, after
lying half a century in his garret and other dust holes, these things were
not burned; instead of a <i>bonfire</i>, or purifying destruction of them,
there was an <i>auction</i>, or increasing of them. The neighbors eagerly
collected to view them, bought them all, and carefully transported them to
their garrets and dust holes, to lie there till their estates are settled,
when they will start again. When a man dies he kicks the dust.</p>
<p>The customs of some savage nations might, perchance, be profitably
imitated by us, for they at least go through the semblance of casting
their slough annually; they have the idea of the thing, whether they have
the reality or not. Would it not be well if we were to celebrate such a
"busk," or "feast of first fruits," as Bartram describes to have been the
custom of the Mucclasse Indians? "When a town celebrates the busk," says
he, "having previously provided themselves with new clothes, new pots,
pans, and other household utensils and furniture, they collect all their
worn out clothes and other despicable things, sweep and cleanse their
houses, squares, and the whole town of their filth, which with all the
remaining grain and other old provisions they cast together into one
common heap, and consume it with fire. After having taken medicine, and
fasted for three days, all the fire in the town is extinguished. During
this fast they abstain from the gratification of every appetite and
passion whatever. A general amnesty is proclaimed; all malefactors may
return to their town."</p>
<p>"On the fourth morning, the high priest, by rubbing dry wood together,
produces new fire in the public square, from whence every habitation in
the town is supplied with the new and pure flame."</p>
<p>They then feast on the new corn and fruits, and dance and sing for three
days, "and the four following days they receive visits and rejoice with
their friends from neighboring towns who have in like manner purified and
prepared themselves."</p>
<p>The Mexicans also practised a similar purification at the end of every
fifty-two years, in the belief that it was time for the world to come to
an end.</p>
<p>I have scarcely heard of a truer sacrament, that is, as the dictionary
defines it, "outward and visible sign of an inward and spiritual grace,"
than this, and I have no doubt that they were originally inspired directly
from Heaven to do thus, though they have no Biblical record of the
revelation.</p>
<p><br/></p>
<p>For more than five years I maintained myself thus solely by the labor of
my hands, and I found that, by working about six weeks in a year, I could
meet all the expenses of living. The whole of my winters, as well as most
of my summers, I had free and clear for study. I have thoroughly tried
school-keeping, and found that my expenses were in proportion, or rather
out of proportion, to my income, for I was obliged to dress and train, not
to say think and believe, accordingly, and I lost my time into the
bargain. As I did not teach for the good of my fellow-men, but simply for
a livelihood, this was a failure. I have tried trade but I found that it
would take ten years to get under way in that, and that then I should
probably be on my way to the devil. I was actually afraid that I might by
that time be doing what is called a good business. When formerly I was
looking about to see what I could do for a living, some sad experience in
conforming to the wishes of friends being fresh in my mind to tax my
ingenuity, I thought often and seriously of picking huckleberries; that
surely I could do, and its small profits might suffice—for my
greatest skill has been to want but little—so little capital it
required, so little distraction from my wonted moods, I foolishly thought.
While my acquaintances went unhesitatingly into trade or the professions,
I contemplated this occupation as most like theirs; ranging the hills all
summer to pick the berries which came in my way, and thereafter carelessly
dispose of them; so, to keep the flocks of Admetus. I also dreamed that I
might gather the wild herbs, or carry evergreens to such villagers as
loved to be reminded of the woods, even to the city, by hay-cart loads.
But I have since learned that trade curses everything it handles; and
though you trade in messages from heaven, the whole curse of trade
attaches to the business.</p>
<p>As I preferred some things to others, and especially valued my freedom, as
I could fare hard and yet succeed well, I did not wish to spend my time in
earning rich carpets or other fine furniture, or delicate cookery, or a
house in the Grecian or the Gothic style just yet. If there are any to
whom it is no interruption to acquire these things, and who know how to
use them when acquired, I relinquish to them the pursuit. Some are
"industrious," and appear to love labor for its own sake, or perhaps
because it keeps them out of worse mischief; to such I have at present
nothing to say. Those who would not know what to do with more leisure than
they now enjoy, I might advise to work twice as hard as they do—work
till they pay for themselves, and get their free papers. For myself I
found that the occupation of a day-laborer was the most independent of
any, especially as it required only thirty or forty days in a year to
support one. The laborer's day ends with the going down of the sun, and he
is then free to devote himself to his chosen pursuit, independent of his
labor; but his employer, who speculates from month to month, has no
respite from one end of the year to the other.</p>
<p>In short, I am convinced, both by faith and experience, that to maintain
one's self on this earth is not a hardship but a pastime, if we will live
simply and wisely; as the pursuits of the simpler nations are still the
sports of the more artificial. It is not necessary that a man should earn
his living by the sweat of his brow, unless he sweats easier than I do.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />