<h2 name="CHAPTER_IX">CHAPTER IX</h2>
<h3>STYLE</h3>
<h4>
Diction—Purity—Propriety—Precision.</h4></center>
<p>It is the object of every writer to put his thoughts into as
effective form as possible so as to make a good impression on the
reader. A person may have noble thoughts and ideas but be unable to
express them in such a way as to appeal to others, consequently he
cannot exert the full force of his intellectuality nor leave the
imprint of his character upon his time, whereas many a man but
indifferently gifted may wield such a facile pen as to attract
attention and win for himself an envious place among his
contemporaries.</p>
<p>In everyday life one sees illustrations of men of excellent
mentality being cast aside and ones of mediocre or in some cases,
little, if any, ability chosen to fill important places. The former
are unable to impress their personality; they have great thoughts,
great ideas, but these thoughts and ideas are locked up in their
brains and are like prisoners behind the bars struggling to get
free. The key of language which would open the door is wanting,
hence they have to remain locked up.</p>
<p>Many a man has to pass through the world unheard of and of
little benefit to it or himself, simply because he cannot bring out
what is in him and make it subservient to his will. It is the duty
of every one to develop his best, not only for the benefit of
himself but for the good of his fellow men. It is not at all
necessary to have great learning or acquirements, the laborer is as
useful in his own place as the philosopher in his; nor is it
necessary to have many talents. One talent rightly used is much
better than ten wrongly used. Often a man can do more with one than
his contemporary can do with ten, often a man can make one dollar
go farther than twenty in the hands of his neighbor, often the poor
man lives more comfortably than the millionaire. All depends upon
the individual himself. If he make right use of what the Creator
has given him and live according to the laws of God and nature he
is fulfilling his allotted place in the universal scheme of
creation, in other words, when he does his best, he is living up to
the standard of a useful manhood.</p>
<p>Now in order to do his best a man of ordinary intelligence and
education should be able to express himself correctly both in
speaking and writing, that is, he should be able to convey his
thoughts in an intelligent manner which the simplest can
understand. The manner in which a speaker or writer conveys his
thoughts is known as his Style. In other words <i>Style</i> may be
defined as the peculiar manner in which a man expresses his
conceptions through the medium of language. It depends upon the
choice of words and their arrangement to convey a meaning. Scarcely
any two writers have exactly the same style, that is to say,
express their ideas after the same peculiar form, just as no two
mortals are fashioned by nature in the same mould, so that one is
an exact counterpart of the other.</p>
<p>Just as men differ in the accent and tones of their voices, so
do they differ in the construction of their language.</p>
<p>Two reporters sent out on the same mission, say to report a
fire, will verbally differ in their accounts though materially both
descriptions will be the same as far as the leading facts are
concerned. One will express himself in a style <i>different</i>
from the other.</p>
<p>If you are asked to describe the dancing of a red-haired lady at
the last charity ball you can either say—"The ruby Circe,
with the Titian locks glowing like the oriflamme which surrounds
the golden god of day as he sinks to rest amid the crimson glory of
the burnished West, gave a divine exhibition of the Terpsichorean
art which thrilled the souls of the multitude" or, you can simply
say—"The red-haired lady danced very well and pleased the
audience."</p>
<p>The former is a specimen of the ultra florid or bombastic style
which may be said to depend upon the pomposity of verbosity for its
effect, the latter is a specimen of simple <i>natural</i> Style.
Needless to say it is to be preferred. The other should be avoided.
It stamps the writer as a person of shallowness, ignorance and
inexperience. It has been eliminated from the newspapers. Even the
most flatulent of yellow sheets no longer tolerate it in their
columns. Affectation and pedantry in style are now universally
condemned.</p>
<p>It is the duty of every speaker and writer to labor after a
pleasing style. It gains him an entrance where he would otherwise
be debarred. Often the interest of a subject depends as much on the
way it is presented as on the subject itself. One writer will make
it attractive, another repulsive. For instance take a passage in
history. Treated by one historian it is like a desiccated mummy,
dry, dull, disgusting, while under the spell of another it is, as
it were, galvanized into a virile living thing which not only
pleases but captivates the reader.</p>
<h3>DICTION</h3>
<p>The first requisite of style is <i>choice</i> of <i>words</i>,
and this comes under the head of <i>Diction</i>, the property of
style which has reference to the words and phrases used in speaking
and writing. The secret of literary skill from any standpoint
consists in putting the right word in the right place. In order to
do this it is imperative to know the meaning of the words we use,
their exact literal meaning. Many synonymous words are seemingly
interchangeable and appear as if the same meaning were applicable
to three or four of them at the same time, but when all such words
are reduced to a final analysis it is clearly seen that there is a
marked difference in their meaning. For instance <i>grief</i> and
<i>sorrow</i> seem to be identical, but they are not. <i>Grief</i>
is active, <i>sorrow</i> is more or less passive; <i>grief</i> is
caused by troubles and misfortunes which come to us from the
outside, while <i>sorrow</i> is often the consequence of our own
acts. <i>Grief</i> is frequently loud and violent, <i>sorrow</i> is
always quiet and retiring. <i>Grief</i> shouts, <i>Sorrow</i>
remains calm.</p>
<p>If you are not sure of the exact meaning of a word look it up
immediately in the dictionary. Sometimes some of our great scholars
are puzzled over simple words in regard to meaning, spelling or
pronunciation. Whenever you meet a strange word note it down until
you discover its meaning and use. Read the best books you can get,
books written by men and women who are acknowledged masters of
language, and study how they use their words, where they place them
in the sentences, and the meanings they convey to the readers.</p>
<p>Mix in good society. Listen attentively to good talkers and try
to imitate their manner of expression. If a word is used you do not
understand, don't be ashamed to ask its meaning.</p>
<p>True, a small vocabulary will carry you through, but it is an
advantage to have a large one. When you live alone a little pot
serves just as well as a large one to cook your victuals and it is
handy and convenient, but when your friends or neighbors come to
dine with you, you will need a much larger pot and it is better to
have it in store, so that you will not be put to shame for your
scantiness of furnishings.</p>
<p>Get as many words as you possibly can—if you don't need
them now, pack them away in the garrets of your brain so that you
can call upon them if you require them.</p>
<p>Keep a note book, jot down the words you don't understand or
clearly understand and consult the dictionary when you get
time.</p>
<h3>PURITY</h3>
<p><i>Purity</i> of style consists in using words which are
reputable, national and present, which means that the words are in
current use by the best authorities, that they are used throughout
the nation and not confined to one particular part, and that they
are words in constant use at the present time.</p>
<p>There are two guiding principles in the choice of
words,—<i>good use</i> and <i>good taste</i>. <i>Good use</i>
tells us whether a word is right or wrong; <i>good taste,</i>
whether it is adapted to our purpose or not.</p>
<p>A word that is obsolete or too new to have gained a place in the
language, or that is a provincialism, should not be used.</p>
<p>Here are the Ten Commandments of English style:</p>
<ol>
<li>
<p>Do not use foreign words.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Do not use a long word when a short one will serve your purpose.
<i>Fire</i> is much better than <i>conflagration</i>.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Do not use technical words, or those understood only by
specialists in their respective lines, except when you are writing
especially for such people.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Do not use slang.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Do not use provincialisms, as "I guess" for "I think"; "I
reckon" for "I know," etc.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Do not in writing prose, use poetical or antiquated words: as
"lore, e'er, morn, yea, nay, verily, peradventure."</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Do not use trite and hackneyed words and expressions; as, "on
the job," "up and in"; "down and out."</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Do not use newspaper words which have not established a place in
the language as "to bugle"; "to suicide," etc.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Do not use ungrammatical words and forms; as, "I ain't;" "he
don't."</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Do not use ambiguous words or phrases; as—"He showed me
all about the house."</p>
</li></ol>
<p>Trite words, similes and metaphors which have become hackneyed
and worn out should be allowed to rest in the oblivion of past
usage. Such expressions and phrases as "Sweet sixteen" "the
Almighty dollar," "Uncle Sam," "On the fence," "The Glorious
Fourth," "Young America," "The lords of creation," "The rising
generation," "The weaker sex," "The weaker vessel," "Sweetness long
drawn out" and "chief cook and bottle washer," should be put on the
shelf as they are utterly worn out from too much usage.</p>
<p>Some of the old similes which have outlived their usefulness and
should be pensioned off, are "Sweet as sugar," "Bold as a lion,"
"Strong as an ox," "Quick as a flash," "Cold as ice," "Stiff as a
poker," "White as snow," "Busy as a bee," "Pale as a ghost," "Rich
as Croesus," "Cross as a bear" and a great many more far too
numerous to mention.</p>
<p>Be as original as possible in the use of expression. Don't
follow in the old rut but try and strike out for yourself. This
does not mean that you should try to set the style, or do anything
outlandish or out of the way, or be an innovator on the prevailing
custom. In order to be original there is no necessity for you to
introduce something novel or establish a precedent. The probability
is you are not fit to do either, by education or talent. While
following the style of those who are acknowledged leaders you can
be original in your language. Try and clothe an idea different from
what it has been clothed and better. If you are speaking or writing
of dancing don't talk or write about "tripping the light fantastic
toe." It is over two hundred years since Milton expressed it that
way in "<i>L'Allegro</i>." You're not a Milton and besides over a
million have stolen it from Milton until it is now no longer worth
stealing.</p>
<p>Don't resurrect obsolete words such as <i>whilom</i>,
<i>yclept</i>, <i>wis</i>, etc., and be careful in regard to
obsolescent words, that is, words that are at the present time
gradually passing from use such as <i>quoth, trow, betwixt,
amongst, froward</i>, etc.</p>
<p>And beware of new words. Be original in the construction and
arrangement of your language, but don't try to originate words.
Leave that to the Masters of language, and don't be the first to
try such words, wait until the chemists of speech have tested them
and passed upon their merits.</p>
<p>Quintilian said—"Prefer the oldest of the new and the
newest of the old." Pope put this in rhyme and it still holds
good:</p>
<p>In words, as fashions, the same rule will hold, Alike fantastic,
if too new or old: Be not the first by whom the new are tried, Nor
yet the last to lay the old aside.</p>
<h3>PROPRIETY</h3>
<p><i>Propriety</i> of style consists in using words in their
proper sense and as in the case of purity, good usage is the
principal test. Many words have acquired in actual use a meaning
very different from what they once possessed. "Prevent" formerly
meant to go before, and that meaning is implied in its Latin
derivation. Now it means to put a stop to, to hinder. To attain
propriety of style it is necessary to avoid confounding words
derived from the same root; as <i>respectfully</i> and
<i>respectively</i>; it is necessary to use words in their accepted
sense or the sense which everyday use sanctions.</p>
<h3>SIMPLICITY</h3>
<p><i>Simplicity</i> of style has reference to the choice of simple
words and their unaffected presentation. Simple words should always
be used in preference to compound, and complicated ones when they
express the same or almost the same meaning. The Anglo-Saxon
element in our language comprises the simple words which express
the relations of everyday life, strong, terse, vigorous, the
language of the fireside, street, market and farm. It is this style
which characterizes the Bible and many of the great English
classics such as the "Pilgrim's Progress," "Robinson Crusoe," and
"Gulliver's Travels."</p>
<h3>CLEARNESS</h3>
<p><i>Clearness</i> of style should be one of the leading
considerations with the beginner in composition. He must avoid all
obscurity and ambiguous phrases. If he write a sentence or phrase
and see that a meaning might be inferred from it otherwise than
intended, he should re-write it in such a way that there can be no
possible doubt. Words, phrases or clauses that are closely related
should be placed as near to each other as possible that their
mutual relation may clearly appear, and no word should be omitted
that is necessary to the complete expression of thought.</p>
<h3>UNITY</h3>
<p><i>Unity</i> is that property of style which keeps all parts of
a sentence in connection with the principal thought and logically
subordinate to it. A sentence may be constructed as to suggest the
idea of oneness to the mind, or it may be so loosely put together
as to produce a confused and indefinite impression. Ideas that have
but little connection should be expressed in separate sentences,
and not crowded into one.</p>
<p>Keep long parentheses out of the middle of your sentences and
when you have apparently brought your sentences to a close don't
try to continue the thought or idea by adding supplementary
clauses.</p>
<h3>STRENGTH</h3>
<p><i>Strength</i> is that property of style which gives animation,
energy and vivacity to language and sustains the interest of the
reader. It is as necessary to language as good food is to the body.
Without it the words are weak and feeble and create little or no
impression on the mind. In order to have strength the language must
be concise, that is, much expressed in little compass, you must hit
the nail fairly on the head and drive it in straight. Go critically
over what you write and strike out every word, phrase and clause
the omission of which impairs neither the clearness nor force of
the sentence and so avoid redundancy, tautology and circumlocution.
Give the most important words the most prominent places, which, as
has been pointed out elsewhere, are the beginning and end of the
sentence.</p>
<h3>HARMONY</h3>
<p><i>Harmony</i> is that property of style which gives a
smoothness to the sentence, so that when the words are sounded
their connection becomes pleasing to the ear. It adapts sound to
sense. Most people construct their sentences without giving thought
to the way they will sound and as a consequence we have many
jarring and discordant combinations such as "Thou strengthenedst
thy position and actedst arbitrarily and derogatorily to my
interests."</p>
<p>Harsh, disagreeable verbs are liable to occur with the Quaker
form <i>Thou</i> of the personal pronoun. This form is now nearly
obsolete, the plural <i>you</i> being almost universally used. To
obtain harmony in the sentence long words that are hard to
pronounce and combinations of letters of one kind should be
avoided.</p>
<h3>EXPRESSIVE OF WRITER</h3>
<p>Style is expressive of the writer, as to who he is and what he
is. As a matter of structure in composition it is the indication of
what a man can do; as a matter of quality it is an indication of
what he is.</p>
<h3>KINDS OF STYLE</h3>
<p>Style has been classified in different ways, but it admits of so
many designations that it is very hard to enumerate a table. In
fact there are as many styles as there are writers, for no two
authors write <i>exactly</i> after the same form. However, we may
classify the styles of the various authors in broad divisions as
(1) dry, (2) plain, (3) neat, (4) elegant, (5) florid, (6)
bombastic.</p>
<p>The <i>dry</i> style excludes all ornament and makes no effort
to appeal to any sense of beauty. Its object is simply to express
the thoughts in a correct manner. This style is exemplified by
Berkeley.</p>
<p>The <i>plain</i> style does not seek ornamentation either, but
aims to make clear and concise statements without any elaboration
or embellishment. Locke and Whately illustrate the plain style.</p>
<p>The <i>neat</i> style only aspires after ornament sparingly. Its
object is to have correct figures, pure diction and clear and
harmonious sentences. Goldsmith and Gray are the acknowledged
leaders in this kind of style.</p>
<p>The <i>elegant</i> style uses every ornament that can beautify
and avoids every excess which would degrade. Macaulay and Addison
have been enthroned as the kings of this style. To them all writers
bend the knee in homage.</p>
<p>The <i>florid</i> style goes to excess in superfluous and
superficial ornamentation and strains after a highly colored
imagery. The poems of Ossian typify this style.</p>
<p>The <i>bombastic</i> is characterized by such an excess of
words, figures and ornaments as to be ridiculous and disgusting. It
is like a circus clown dressed up in gold tinsel Dickens gives a
fine example of it in Sergeant Buzfuz' speech in the "Pickwick
Papers." Among other varieties of style may be mentioned the
colloquial, the laconic, the concise, the diffuse, the abrupt the
flowing, the quaint, the epigrammatic, the flowery, the feeble, the
nervous, the vehement, and the affected. The manner of these is
sufficiently indicated by the adjective used to describe them.</p>
<p>In fact style is as various as character and expresses the
individuality of the writer, or in other words, as the French
writer Buffon very aptly remarks, "the style is the man
himself."</p>
<center>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />