<h3><SPAN name="CHAPTER_XXI" id="CHAPTER_XXI"></SPAN>CHAPTER XXI</h3>
<h4>INFLUENCING BY NARRATION</h4>
<p>The art of narration is the art of writing in hooks and eyes.
The principle consists in making the appropriate thought follow
the appropriate thought, the proper fact the proper fact; in
first preparing the mind for what is to come, and then letting
it come.—<span class="smcap">Walter Bagehot</span>, <i>Literary Studies</i>.</p>
<p>Our very speech is curiously historical. Most men, you may
observe, speak only to narrate; not in imparting what they have
thought, which indeed were often a very small matter, but in
exhibiting what they have undergone or seen, which is a quite
unlimited one, do talkers dilate. Cut us off from Narrative, how
would the stream of conversation, even among the wisest,
languish into detached handfuls, and among the foolish utterly
evaporate! Thus, as we do nothing but enact History, we say
little but recite it.—<span class="smcap">Thomas Carlyle</span>, <i>On History</i>.</p>
<p>Only a small segment of the great field of narration offers its
resources to the public speaker, and that includes the anecdote,
biographical facts, and the narration of events in general.</p>
<p>Narration—more easily defined than mastered—is the recital of an
incident, or a group of facts and occurrences, in such a manner as to
produce a desired effect.</p>
<p>The laws of narration are few, but its successful practise involves more
of art than would at first appear—so much, indeed, that we cannot even
touch upon its technique here, but must content ourselves with an
examination of a few examples of narration as used in public speech.</p>
<p><SPAN name="Page_250" id="Page_250"></SPAN></p>
<p>In a preliminary way, notice how radically the public speaker's use of
narrative differs from that of the story-writer in the more limited
scope, absence of extended dialogue and character drawing, and freedom
from elaboration of detail, which characterize platform narrative. On
the other hand, there are several similarities of method: the frequent
combination of narration with exposition, description, argumentation,
and pleading; the care exercised in the arrangement of material so as to
produce a strong effect at the close (climax); the very general practise
of concealing the "point" (dénouement) of a story until the effective
moment; and the careful suppression of needless, and therefore hurtful,
details.</p>
<p>So we see that, whether for magazine or platform, the art of narration
involves far more than the recital of annals; the succession of events
recorded requires a <i>plan</i> in order to bring them out with real effect.</p>
<p>It will be noticed, too, that the literary style in platform narration
is likely to be either less polished and more vigorously dramatic than
in that intended for publication, or else more fervid and elevated in
tone. In this latter respect, however, the best platform speaking of
today differs from the models of the preceding generation, wherein a
highly dignified, and sometimes pompous, style was thought the only
fitting dress for a public deliverance. Great, noble and stirring as
these older masters were in their lofty and impassioned eloquence, we
are sometimes oppressed when we read their sounding periods for any
great length of time—even allowing for all that we lose by missing the
speaker's presence, voice, and fire. So let <SPAN name="Page_251" id="Page_251"></SPAN>us model our platform
narration, as our other forms of speech, upon the effective addresses of
the moderns, without lessening our admiration for the older school.</p>
<p><span class="u"><i>The Anecdote</i></span></p>
<p>An anecdote is a short narrative of a single event, told as being
striking enough to bring out a point. The keener the point, the more
condensed the form, and the more suddenly the application strikes the
hearer, the better the story.</p>
<p>To regard an anecdote as an illustration—an interpretive picture—will
help to hold us to its true purpose, for a purposeless story is of all
offenses on the platform the most asinine. A perfectly capital joke will
fall flat when it is dragged in by the nape without evident bearing on
the subject under discussion. On the other hand, an apposite anecdote
has saved many a speech from failure.</p>
<p>"There is no finer opportunity for the display of tact than in the
introduction of witty or humorous stories into a discourse. Wit is keen
and like a rapier, piercing deeply, sometimes even to the heart. Humor
is good-natured, and does not wound. Wit is founded upon the sudden
discovery of an unsuspected relation existing between two ideas. Humor
deals with things out of relation—with the incongruous. It was wit in
Douglass Jerrold to retort upon the scowl of a stranger whose shoulder
he had familiarly slapped, mistaking him for a friend: 'I beg your
pardon, I thought I knew you—but I'm glad I don't.' It was humor in the
Southern orator, John Wise, to liken the pleasure of spending an
<SPAN name="Page_252" id="Page_252"></SPAN>evening with a Puritan girl to that of sitting on a block of ice in
winter, cracking hailstones between his teeth."<SPAN name="FNanchor_24_25" id="FNanchor_24_25"></SPAN><SPAN href="#Footnote_24_25" class="fnanchor">[24]</SPAN></p>
<p>The foregoing quotation has been introduced chiefly to illustrate the
first and simplest form of anecdote—the single sentence embodying a
pungent saying.</p>
<p>Another simple form is that which conveys its meaning without need of
"application," as the old preachers used to say. George Ade has quoted
this one as the best joke he ever heard:</p>
<p>Two solemn-looking gentlemen were riding together in a railway
carriage. One gentleman said to the other: "Is your wife
entertaining this summer?" Whereupon the other gentleman
replied: "Not very."</p>
<p>Other anecdotes need harnessing to the particular truth the speaker
wishes to carry along in his talk. Sometimes the application is made
before the story is told and the audience is prepared to make the
comparison, point by point, as the illustration is told. Henry W. Grady
used this method in one of the anecdotes he told while delivering his
great extemporaneous address, "The New South."</p>
<p>Age does not endow all things with strength and virtue, nor are
all new things to be despised. The shoemaker who put over his
door, "John Smith's shop, founded 1760," was more than matched
by his young rival across the street who hung out this sign:
"Bill Jones. Established 1886. No old stock kept in this shop."</p>
<p>In two anecdotes, told also in "The New South," Mr. Grady illustrated
another way of enforcing the applica<SPAN name="Page_253" id="Page_253"></SPAN>tion: in both instances he split
the idea he wished to drive home, bringing in part before and part after
the recital of the story. The fact that the speaker misquoted the words
of Genesis in which the Ark is described did not seem to detract from
the burlesque humor of the story.</p>
<p>I bespeak the utmost stretch of your courtesy tonight. I am not
troubled about those from whom I come. You remember the man
whose wife sent him to a neighbor with a pitcher of milk, who,
tripping on the top step, fell, with such casual interruptions
as the landings afforded, into the basement, and, while picking
himself up, had the pleasure of hearing his wife call out:</p>
<p>"John, did you break the pitcher?</p>
<p>"No, I didn't," said John, "but I be dinged if I don't."</p>
<p>So, while those who call to me from behind may inspire me with
energy, if not with courage, I ask an indulgent hearing from
you. I beg that you will bring your full faith in American
fairness and frankness to judgment upon what I shall say. There
was an old preacher once who told some boys of the Bible lesson
he was going to read in the morning. The boys, finding the
place, glued together the connecting pages. The next morning he
read on the bottom of one page: "When Noah was one hundred and
twenty years old he took unto himself a wife, who was"—then
turning the page—"one hundred and forty cubits long, forty
cubits wide, built of gopher wood, and covered with pitch inside
and out." He was naturally puzzled at this. He read it again,
verified it, and then said, "My friends, this is the first time
I ever met this in the Bible, but I accept it as an evidence of
the assertion that we are fearfully and wonderfully made." If I
could get you to hold such faith to-night, I could proceed
cheerfully to the task I otherwise approach with a sense of
consecration.</p>
<p>Now and then a speaker will plunge without introduction into an
anecdote, leaving the application to follow. The following illustrates
this method:</p>
<p>A large, slew-footed darky was leaning against the corner of the
railroad station in a Texas town when the noon whistle in the
<SPAN name="Page_254" id="Page_254"></SPAN>canning factory blew and the hands hurried out, bearing their
grub buckets. The darky listened, with his head on one side
until the rocketing echo had quite died away. Then he heaved a
deep sigh and remarked to himself:</p>
<p>"Dar she go. Dinner time for some folks—but jes' 12 o'clock fur
me!"</p>
<p>That is the situation in thousands of American factories, large
and small, today. And why? etc., etc.</p>
<p>Doubtless the most frequent platform use of the anecdote is in the
pulpit. The sermon "illustration," however, is not always strictly
narrative in form, but tends to extended comparison, as the following
from Dr. Alexander Maclaren:</p>
<p>Men will stand as Indian fakirs do, with their arms above their
heads until they stiffen there. They will perch themselves upon
pillars like Simeon Stylites, for years, till the birds build
their nests in their hair. They will measure all the distance
from Cape Comorin to Juggernaut's temple with their bodies along
the dusty road. They will wear hair shirts and scourge
themselves. They will fast and deny themselves. They will build
cathedrals and endow churches. They will do as many of you do,
labor by fits and starts all thru your lives at the endless task
of making yourselves ready for heaven, and winning it by
obedience and by righteousness. They will do all these things
and do them gladly, rather than listen to the humbling message
that says, "You do not need to do anything—wash." Is it your
washing, or the water, that will clean you? Wash and be clean!
Naaman's cleaning was only a test of his obedience, and a token
that it was God who cleansed him. There was no power in Jordan's
waters to take away the taint of leprosy. Our cleansing is in
that blood of Jesus Christ that has the power to take away all
sin, and to make the foulest amongst us pure and clean.</p>
<p>One final word must be said about the introduction to the anecdote. A
clumsy, inappropriate introduction is <SPAN name="Page_255" id="Page_255"></SPAN>fatal, whereas a single apt or
witty sentence will kindle interest and prepare a favorable hearing. The
following extreme illustration, by the English humorist, Captain Harry
Graham, well satirizes the stumbling manner:</p>
<p>The best story that I ever heard was one that I was told once in
the fall of 1905 (or it may have been 1906), when I was visiting
Boston—at least, I think it was Boston; it may have been
Washington (my memory is so bad).</p>
<p>I happened to run across a most amusing man whose name I
forget—Williams or Wilson or Wilkins; some name like that—and
he told me this story while we were waiting for a trolley car.</p>
<p>I can still remember how heartily I laughed at the time; and
again, that evening, after I had gone to bed, how I laughed
myself to sleep recalling the humor of this incredibly humorous
story. It was really quite extraordinarily funny. In fact, I can
truthfully affirm that it is quite the most amusing story I have
ever had the privilege of hearing. Unfortunately, I've forgotten
it.</p>
<p><span class="u"><i>Biographical Facts</i></span></p>
<p>Public speaking has much to do with personalities; naturally, therefore,
the narration of a series of biographical details, including anecdotes
among the recital of interesting facts, plays a large part in the
eulogy, the memorial address, the political speech, the sermon, the
lecture, and other platform deliverances. Whole addresses may be made up
of such biographical details, such as a sermon on "Moses," or a lecture
on "Lee."</p>
<p>The following example is in itself an expanded anecdote, forming a link
in a chain:</p>
<p><i>MARIUS IN PRISON</i></p>
<p>The peculiar sublimity of the Roman mind does not express
itself, nor is it at all to be sought, in their poetry. Poetry,
accord<SPAN name="Page_256" id="Page_256"></SPAN>ing to the Roman ideal of it, was not an adequate organ
for the grander movements of the national mind. Roman sublimity
must be looked for in Roman acts, and in Roman sayings. Where,
again, will you find a more adequate expression of the Roman
majesty, than in the saying of Trajan—<i>Imperatorem oportere
stantem mori</i>—that Cæsar ought to die standing; a speech of
imperatorial grandeur! Implying that he, who was "the foremost
man of all this world,"—and, in regard to all other nations,
the representative of his own,—should express its
characteristic virtue in his farewell act—should die <i>in
procinctu</i>—and should meet the last enemy as the first, with a
Roman countenance and in a soldier's attitude. If this had an
imperatorial—what follows had a consular majesty, and is almost
the grandest story upon record.</p>
<p>Marius, the man who rose to be seven times consul, was in a
dungeon, and a slave was sent in with commission to put him to
death. These were the persons,—the two extremities of exalted
and forlorn humanity, its vanward and its rearward man, a Roman
consul and an abject slave. But their natural relations to each
other were, by the caprice of fortune, monstrously inverted: the
consul was in chains; the slave was for a moment the arbiter of
his fate. By what spells, what magic, did Marius reinstate
himself in his natural prerogatives? By what marvels drawn from
heaven or from earth, did he, in the twinkling of an eye, again
invest himself with the purple, and place between himself and
his assassin a host of shadowy lictors? By the mere blank
supremacy of great minds over weak ones. He <i>fascinated</i> the
slave, as a rattlesnake does a bird. Standing "like Teneriffe,"
he smote him with his eye, and said, "<i>Tune, homo, audes
occidere C. Marium?</i>"—"Dost thou, fellow, presume to kill Caius
Marius?" Whereat, the reptile, quaking under the voice, nor
daring to affront the consular eye, sank gently to the
ground—turned round upon his hands and feet—and, crawling out
of the prison like any other vermin, left Marius standing in
solitude as steadfast and immovable as the capitol.</p>
<p class='author'>—<span class="smcap">Thomas De Quincy</span>.</p>
<p>Here is a similar example, prefaced by a general his<SPAN name="Page_257" id="Page_257"></SPAN>torical statement
and concluding with autobiographical details:</p>
<p><i>A REMINISCENCE OF LEXINGTON</i></p>
<p>One raw morning in spring—it will be eighty years the 19th day
of this month—Hancock and Adams, the Moses and Aaron of that
Great Deliverance, were both at Lexington; they also had
"obstructed an officer" with brave words. British soldiers, a
thousand strong, came to seize them and carry them over sea for
trial, and so nip the bud of Freedom auspiciously opening in
that early spring. The town militia came together before
daylight, "for training." A great, tall man, with a large head
and a high, wide brow, their captain,—one who had "seen
service,"—marshalled them into line, numbering but seventy, and
bade "every man load his piece with powder and ball. I will
order the first man shot that runs away," said he, when some
faltered. "Don't fire unless fired upon, but if they want to
have a war, let it begin here."</p>
<p>Gentlemen, you know what followed; those farmers and mechanics
"fired the shot heard round the world." A little monument covers
the bones of such as before had pledged their fortune and their
sacred honor to the Freedom of America, and that day gave it
also their lives. I was born in that little town, and bred up
amid the memories of that day. When a boy, my mother lifted me
up, one Sunday, in her religious, patriotic arms, and held me
while I read the first monumental line I ever saw—"Sacred to
Liberty and the Rights of Mankind."</p>
<p>Since then I have studied the memorial marbles of Greece and
Rome, in many an ancient town; nay, on Egyptian obelisks have
read what was written before the Eternal raised up Moses to lead
Israel out of Egypt; but no chiseled stone has ever stirred me
to such emotion as these rustic names of men who fell "In the
Sacred Cause of God and their Country."</p>
<p>Gentlemen, the Spirit of Liberty, the Love of Justice, were
early fanned into a flame in my boyish heart. That monument
covers the bones of my own kinsfolk; it was their blood which
reddened the long, green grass at Lexington. It was my own name
which stands chiseled on that stone; the tall captain who
marshalled <SPAN name="Page_258" id="Page_258"></SPAN>his fellow farmers and mechanics into stern array,
and spoke such brave and dangerous words as opened the war of
American Independence,—the last to leave the field,—was my
father's father. I learned to read out of his Bible, and with a
musket he that day captured from the foe, I learned another
religious lesson, that "Rebellion to Tyrants is Obedience to
God." I keep them both "Sacred to Liberty and the Rights of
Mankind," to use them both "In the Sacred Cause of God and my
Country."—<span class="smcap">Theodore Parker</span>.</p>
<p><span class="u"><i>Narration of Events in General</i></span></p>
<p>In this wider, emancipated narration we find much mingling of other
forms of discourse, greatly to the advantage of the speech, for this
truth cannot be too strongly emphasized: The efficient speaker cuts
loose from form for the sake of a big, free effect. The present analyses
are for no other purpose than to <i>acquaint</i> you with form—do not allow
any such models to hang as a weight about your neck.</p>
<p>The following pure narration of events, from George William Curtis's
"Paul Revere's Ride," varies the biographical recital in other parts of
his famous oration:</p>
<p>That evening, at ten o'clock, eight hundred British troops,
under Lieutenant-Colonel Smith, took boat at the foot of the
Common and crossed to the Cambridge shore. Gage thought his
secret had been kept, but Lord Percy, who had heard the people
say on the Common that the troops would miss their aim,
undeceived him. Gage instantly ordered that no one should leave
the town. But as the troops crossed the river, Ebenezer Dorr,
with a message to Hancock and Adams, was riding over the Neck to
Roxbury, and Paul Revere was rowing over the river to
Charlestown, having agreed with his friend, Robert Newman, to
show lanterns from the belfry of the Old North Church—"One if
by land, and two if by sea"—as a signal of the march of the
British.</p>
<p><SPAN name="Page_259" id="Page_259"></SPAN></p>
<p>The following, from the same oration, beautifully mingles description
with narration:</p>
<p>It was a brilliant night. The winter had been unusually mild,
and the spring very forward. The hills were already green. The
early grain waved in the fields, and the air was sweet with the
blossoming orchards. Already the robins whistled, the bluebirds
sang, and the benediction of peace rested upon the landscape.
Under the cloudless moon the soldiers silently marched, and Paul
Revere swiftly rode, galloping through Medford and West
Cambridge, rousing every house as he went spurring for Lexington
and Hancock and Adams, and evading the British patrols who had
been sent out to stop the news.</p>
<p>In the succeeding extract from another of Mr. Curtis's addresses, we
have a free use of allegory as illustration:</p>
<p><i>THE LEADERSHIP OF EDUCATED MEN</i></p>
<p>There is a modern English picture which the genius of Hawthorne
might have inspired. The painter calls it, "How they met
themselves." A man and a woman, haggard and weary, wandering
lost in a somber wood, suddenly meet the shadowy figures of a
youth and a maid. Some mysterious fascination fixes the gaze and
stills the hearts of the wanderers, and their amazement deepens
into awe as they gradually recognize themselves as once they
were; the soft bloom of youth upon their rounded cheeks, the
dewy light of hope in their trusting eyes, exulting confidence
in their springing step, themselves blithe and radiant with the
glory of the dawn. Today, and here, we meet ourselves. Not to
these familiar scenes alone—yonder college-green with its
reverend traditions; the halcyon cove of the Seekonk, upon which
the memory of Roger Williams broods like a bird of calm; the
historic bay, beating forever with the muffled oars of Barton
and of Abraham Whipple; here, the humming city of the living;
there, the peaceful city of the dead;—not to these only or
chiefly do we return, but to ourselves as we once were. It is
not the smiling freshmen of the year, it is your own beardless
and unwrinkled faces, that are looking from the windows of
University<SPAN name="Page_260" id="Page_260"></SPAN> Hall and of Hope College. Under the trees upon the
hill it is yourselves whom you see walking, full of hopes and
dreams, glowing with conscious power, and "nourishing a youth
sublime;" and in this familiar temple, which surely has never
echoed with eloquence so fervid and inspiring as that of your
commencement orations, it is not yonder youths in the galleries
who, as they fondly believe, are whispering to yonder maids; it
is your younger selves who, in the days that are no more, are
murmuring to the fairest mothers and grandmothers of those
maids.</p>
<p>Happy the worn and weary man and woman in the picture could they
have felt their older eyes still glistening with that earlier
light, and their hearts yet beating with undiminished sympathy
and aspiration. Happy we, brethren, whatever may have been
achieved, whatever left undone, if, returning to the home of our
earlier years, we bring with us the illimitable hope, the
unchilled resolution, the inextinguishable faith of youth.</p>
<p class='author'>—<span class="smcap">George William Curtis</span>.</p>
<h3>QUESTIONS AND EXERCISES</h3>
<p>1. Clip from any source ten anecdotes and state what truths they may be
used to illustrate.</p>
<p>2. Deliver five of these in your own language, without making any
application.</p>
<p>3. From the ten, deliver one so as to make the application before
telling the anecdote.</p>
<p>4. Deliver another so as to split the application.</p>
<p>5. Deliver another so as to make the application after the narration.</p>
<p>6. Deliver another in such a way as to make a specific application
needless.</p>
<p>7. Give three ways of introducing an anecdote, by saying where you heard
it, etc.</p>
<p>8. Deliver an illustration that is not strictly an anecdote, in the
style of Curtis's speech on page <SPAN href='#Page_259'>259</SPAN>.</p>
<p><SPAN name="Page_261" id="Page_261"></SPAN></p>
<p>9. Deliver an address on any public character, using the forms
illustrated in this chapter.</p>
<p>10. Deliver an address on some historical event in the same manner.</p>
<p>11. Explain how the sympathies and viewpoint of the speaker will color
an anecdote, a biography, or a historical account.</p>
<p>12. Illustrate how the same anecdote, or a section of a historical
address, may be given two different effects by personal prejudice.</p>
<p>13. What would be the effect of shifting the viewpoint in the midst of a
narration?</p>
<p>14. What is the danger of using too much humor in an address? Too much
pathos?</p>
<h3>FOOTNOTES:</h3>
<p><SPAN name="Footnote_24_25" id="Footnote_24_25"></SPAN><SPAN href="#FNanchor_24_25"><span class="label">[24]</span></SPAN> <i>How to Attract and Hold an Audience</i>, J. Berg Esenwein.</p>
<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><SPAN name="Page_262" id="Page_262"></SPAN></p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />