<p><SPAN name="link132HCH0010" id="link132HCH0010">
<!-- h3 anchor --> </SPAN></p>
<h3> CHAPTER 10. How Upon The Quarrel Between Antiochus Grypus And Antiochus Cyzicenus About The Kingdom Hyrcanus Tooksamaria, And Utterly Demolished It; And How Hyrcaus Joined Himself To The Sect Of The Sadducees, And Left That Of The Pharisees. </h3>
<p>1. When Antiochus had taken the kingdom, he was afraid to make war against
Judea, because he heard that his brother by the same mother, who was also
called Antiochus, was raising an army against him out of Cyzicum; so he
staid in his own land, and resolved to prepare himself for the attack he
expected from his brother, who was called Cyzicenus, because he had been
brought up in that city. He was the son of Antiochus that was called
Soter, who died in Parthia. He was the brother of Demetrius, the father of
Grypus; for it had so happened, that one and the same Cleopatra was
married to two who were brethren, as we have related elsewhere. But
Antiochus Cyzicenus coming into Syria, continued many years at war with
his brother. Now Hyrcanus lived all this while in peace; for after the
death of Antlochus, he revolted from the Macedonians, <SPAN href="#link13note-27" name="link13noteref-27" id="link13noteref-27"><small>27</small></SPAN>
nor did he any longer pay them the least regard, either as their subject
or their friend; but his affairs were in a very improving and flourishing
condition in the times of Alexander Zebina, and especially under these
brethren, for the war which they had with one another gave Hyrcanus the
opportunity of enjoying himself in Judea quietly, insomuch that he got an
immense quantity of money. How ever, when Antiochus Cyzicenus distressed
his land, he then openly showed what he meant. And when he saw that
Antiochus was destitute of Egyptian auxiliaries, and that both he and his
brother were in an ill condition in the struggles they had one with
another, he despised them both.</p>
<p>2. So he made an expedition against Samaria which was a very strong city;
of whose present name Sebaste, and its rebuilding by Herod, we shall speak
at a proper time; but he made his attack against it, and besieged it with
a great deal of pains; for he was greatly displeased with the Samaritans
for the injuries they had done to the people of Merissa, a colony of the
Jews, and confederate with them, and this in compliance to the kings of
Syria. When he had therefore drawn a ditch, and built a double wall round
the city, which was fourscore furlongs long, he set his sons Antigonus and
Arisrobulna over the siege; which brought the Samaritans to that great
distress by famine, that they were forced to eat what used not to be
eaten, and to call for Antiochus Cyzicenus to help them, who came readily
to their assistance, but was beaten by Aristobulus; and when he was
pursued as far as Scythopolis by the two brethren, he got away. So they
returned to Samaria, and shut them again within the wall, till they were
forced to send for the same Antiochus a second time to help them, who
procured about six thousand men from Ptolemy Lathyrus, which were sent
them without his mother's consent, who had then in a manner turned him out
of his government. With these Egyptians Antiochus did at first overrun and
ravage the country of Hyrcanus after the manner of a robber, for he durst
not meet him in the face to fight with him, as not having an army
sufficient for that purpose, but only from this supposal, that by thus
harassing his land he should force Hyrcanus to raise the siege of Samaria;
but because he fell into snares, and lost many of his soldiers therein, he
went away to Tripoli, and committed the prosecution of the war against the
Jews to Callimander and Epicrates.</p>
<p>3. But as to Callimander, he attacked the enemy too rashly, and was put to
flight, and destroyed immediately; and as to Epicrates, he was such a
lover of money, that he openly betrayed Scythopolis, and other places near
it, to the Jews, but was not able to make them raise the siege of Samaria.
And when Hyrcanus had taken that city, which was not done till after a
year's siege, he was not contented with doing that only, but he demolished
it entirely, and brought rivulets to it to drown it, for he dug such
hollows as might let the water run under it; nay, he took away the very
marks that there had ever been such a city there. Now a very surprising
thing is related of this high priest Hyrcanus, how God came to discourse
with him; for they say that on the very same day on which his sons fought
with Antiochus Cyzicenus, he was alone in the temple, as high priest,
offering incense, and heard a voice, that his sons had just then overcome
Antiochus. And this he openly declared before all the multitude upon his
coming out of the temple; and it accordingly proved true; and in this
posture were the affairs of Hyrcanus.</p>
<p>4. Now it happened at this time, that not only those Jews who were at
Jerusalem and in Judea were in prosperity, but also those of them that
were at Alexandria, and in Egypt and Cyprus; for Cleopatra the queen was
at variance with her son Ptolemy, who was called Lathyrus, and appointed
for her generals Chelcias and Ananias, the sons of that Onias who built
the temple in the prefecture of Heliopolis, like to that at Jerusalem, as
we have elsewhere related. Cleopatra intrusted these men with her army,
and did nothing without their advice, as Strabo of Cappadocia attests,
when he saith thus, "Now the greater part, both those that came to Cyprus
with us, and those that were sent afterward thither, revolted to Ptolemy
immediately; only those that were called Onias's party, being Jews,
continued faithful, because their countrymen Chelcias and Ananias were in
chief favor with the queen." These are the words of Strabo.</p>
<p>5. However, this prosperous state of affairs moved the Jews to envy
Hyrcanus; but they that were the worst disposed to him were the Pharisees,
<SPAN href="#link13note-28" name="link13noteref-28" id="link13noteref-28"><small>28</small></SPAN>
who were one of the sects of the Jews, as we have informed you already.
These have so great a power over the multitude, that when they say any
thing against the king, or against the high priest, they are presently
believed. Now Hyrcanus was a disciple of theirs, and greatly beloved by
them. And when he once invited them to a feast, and entertained them very
kindly, when he saw them in a good humor, he began to say to them, that
they knew he was desirous to be a righteous man, and to do all things
whereby he might please God, which was the profession of the Pharisees
also. However, he desired, that if they observed him offending in any
point, and going out of the right way, they would call him back and
correct him. On which occasion they attested to his being entirely
virtuous; with which commendation he was well pleased. But still there was
one of his guests there, whose name was Eleazar, a man of an ill temper,
and delighting in seditious practices. This man said, "Since thou desirest
to know the truth, if thou wilt be righteous in earnest, lay down the high
priesthood, and content thyself with the civil government of the people,"
And when he desired to know for what cause he ought to lay down the high
priesthood, the other replied, "We have heard it from old men, that thy
mother had been a captive under the reign of Antiochus Epiphanes. <SPAN href="#link13note-29" name="link13noteref-29" id="link13noteref-29"><small>29</small></SPAN>"
This story was false, and Hyrcanus was provoked against him; and all the
Pharisees had a very great indignation against him.</p>
<p>6. Now there was one Jonathan, a very great friend of Hyrcanus's, but of
the sect of the Sadducees, whose notions are quite contrary to those of
the Pharisees. He told Hyrcanus that Eleazar had cast such a reproach upon
him, according to the common sentiments of all the Pharisees, and that
this would be made manifest if he would but ask them the question, What
punishment they thought this man deserved? for that he might depend upon
it, that the reproach was not laid on him with their approbation, if they
were for punishing him as his crime deserved. So the Pharisees made
answer, that he deserved stripes and bonds, but that it did not seem right
to punish reproaches with death. And indeed the Pharisees, even upon other
occasions, are not apt to be severe in punishments. At this gentle
sentence, Hyrcanus was very angry, and thought that this man reproached
him by their approbation. It was this Jonathan who chiefly irritated him,
and influenced him so far, that he made him leave the party of the
Pharisees, and abolish the decrees they had imposed on the people, and to
punish those that observed them. From this source arose that hatred which
he and his sons met with from the multitude: but of these matters we shall
speak hereafter. What I would now explain is this, that the Pharisees have
delivered to the people a great many observances by succession from their
fathers, which are not written in the laws of Moses; and for that reason
it is that the Sadducees reject them, and say that we are to esteem those
observances to be obligatory which are in the written word, but are not to
observe what are derived from the tradition of our forefathers. And
concerning these things it is that great disputes and differences have
arisen among them, while the Sadducees are able to persuade none but the
rich, and have not the populace obsequious to them, but the Pharisees have
the multitude on their side. But about these two sects, and that of the
Essens, I have treated accurately in the second book of Jewish affairs.</p>
<p>7. But when Hyrcanus had put an end to this sedition, he after that lived
happily, and administered the government in the best manner for thirty-one
years, and then died, <SPAN href="#link13note-30" name="link13noteref-30" id="link13noteref-30"><small>30</small></SPAN> leaving behind him five sons.
He was esteemed by God worthy of three of the greatest privileges,—the
government of his nation, the dignity of the high priesthood, and
prophecy; for God was with him, and enabled him to know futurities; and to
foretell this in particular, that, as to his two eldest sons, he foretold
that they would not long continue in the government of public affairs;
whose unhappy catastrophe will be worth our description, that we may
thence learn how very much they were inferior to their father's happiness.</p>
<p><SPAN name="link132HCH0011" id="link132HCH0011">
<!-- h3 anchor --> </SPAN></p>
<h3> CHAPTER 11. How Aristobulus, When He Had Taken The Government First Of All Put A Diadem On His Head, And Was Most Barbarously Cruel To His Mother And His Brethren; And How, After He Had Slain Antigonus, He Himself Died. </h3>
<p>1. Now when their father Hyrcanus was dead, the eldest son Aristobulus,
intending to change the government into a kingdom, for so he resolved to
do, first of all put a diadem on his head, four hundred eighty and one
years and three months after the people had been delivered from the
Babylonish slavery, and were returned to their own country again. This
Aristobulus loved his next brother Antigonus, and treated him as his
equal; but the others he held in bonds. He also cast his mother into
prison, because she disputed the government with him; for Hyrcanus had
left her to be mistress of all. He also proceeded to that degree of
barbarity, as to kill her in prison with hunger; nay, he was alienated
from his brother Antigonus by calumnies, and added him to the rest whom he
slew; yet he seemed to have an affection for him, and made him above the
rest a partner with him in the kingdom. Those calumnies he at first did
not give credit to, partly because he loved him, and so did not give heed
to what was said against him, and partly because he thought the reproaches
were derived from the envy of the relaters. But when Antigonus was once
returned from the army, and that feast was then at hand when they make
tabernacles to [the honor of God,] it happened that Arlstobulus was fallen
sick, and that Antigonus went up most splendidly adorned, and with his
soldiers about him in their armor, to the temple to celebrate the feast,
and to put up many prayers for the recovery of his brother, when some
wicked persons, who had a great mind to raise a difference between the
brethren, made use of this opportunity of the pompous appearance of
Antigonus, and of the great actions which he had done, and went to the
king, and spitefully aggravated the pompous show of his at the feast, and
pretended that all these circumstances were not like those of a private
person; that these actions were indications of an affectation of royal
authority; and that his coming with a strong body of men must be with an
intention to kill him; and that his way of reasoning was this: That it was
a silly thing in him, while it was in his power to reign himself, to look
upon it as a great favor that he was honored with a lower dignity by his
brother.</p>
<p>2. Aristobulus yielded to these imputations, but took care both that his
brother should not suspect him, and that he himself might not run the
hazard of his own safety; so he ordered his guards to lie in a certain
place that was under ground, and dark; [he himself then lying sick in the
tower which was called Antonia;] and he commanded them, that in case
Antigonus came in to him unarmed, they should not touch any body, but if
armed, they should kill him; yet did he send to Antigonus, and desired
that he would come unarmed; but the queen, and those that joined with her
in the plot against Antigonus, persuaded the messenger to tell him the
direct contrary: how his brother had heard that he had made himself a fine
suit of armor for war, and desired him to come to him in that armor, that
he might see how fine it was. So Antigonus suspecting no treachery, but
depending on the good-will of his brother, came to Aristobulus armed, as
he used to be, with his entire armor, in order to show it to him; but when
he was come to a place which was called Strato's Tower, where the passage
happened to be exceeding dark, the guards slew him; which death of his
demonstrates that nothing is stronger than envy and calumny, and that
nothing does more certainly divide the good-will and natural affections of
men than those passions. But here one may take occasion to wonder at one
Judas, who was of the sect of the Essens, <SPAN href="#link13note-31"
name="link13noteref-31" id="link13noteref-31"><small>31</small></SPAN> and
who never missed the truth in his predictions; for this man, when he saw
Antigonus passing by the temple, cried out to his companions and friends,
who abode with him as his scholars, in order to learn the art of
foretelling things to come? "That it was good for him to die now, since he
had spoken falsely about Antigonus, who is still alive, and I see him
passing by, although he had foretold he should die at the place called
Strato's Tower that very day, while yet the place is six hundred furlongs
off, where he had foretold he should be slain; and still this day is a
great part of it already past, so that he was in danger of proving a false
prophet." As he was saying this, and that in a melancholy mood, the news
came that Antigonus was slain in a place under ground, which itself was
called also Strato's Tower, or of the same name with that Cesarea which is
seated at the sea. This event put the prophet into a great disorder.</p>
<p>3. But Aristobulus repented immediately of this slaughter of his brother;
on which account his disease increased upon him, and he was disturbed in
his mind, upon the guilt of such wickedness, insomuch that his entrails
were corrupted by his intolerable pain, and he vomited blood: at which
time one of the servants that attended upon him, and was carrying his
blood away, did, by Divine Providence, as I cannot but suppose, slip down,
and shed part of his blood at the very place where there were spots of
Antigonus's blood, there slain, still remaining; and when there was a cry
made by the spectators, as if the servant had on purpose shed the blood on
that place, Aristobulus heard it, and inquired what the matter was; and as
they did not answer him, he was the more earnest to know what it was, it
being natural to men to suspect that what is thus concealed is very bad:
so upon his threatening, and forcing them by terrors to speak, they at
length told him the truth; whereupon he shed many tears, in that disorder
of mind which arose from his consciousness of what he had done, and gave a
deep groan, and said, "I am not therefore, I perceive, to be concealed
from God, in the impious and horrid crimes I have been guilty of; but a
sudden punishment is coming upon me for the shedding the blood of my
relations. And now, O thou most impudent body of mine, how long wilt thou
retain a soul that ought to die, in order to appease the ghosts of my
brother and my mother? Why dost thou not give it all up at once? And why
do I deliver up my blood drop by drop to those whom I have so wickedly
murdered?" In saying which last words he died, having reigned a year. He
was called a lover of the Grecians; and had conferred many benefits on his
own country, and made war against Iturea, and added a great part of it to
Judea, and compelled the inhabitants, if they would continue in that
country, to be circumcised, and to live according to the Jewish laws. He
was naturally a man of candor, and of great modesty, as Strabo bears
witness, in the name of Timagenes; who says thus: "This man was a person
of candor, and very serviceable to the Jews; for he added a country to
them, and obtained a part of the nation of the Itureans for them, and
bound them to them by the bond of the circumcision of their genitals."</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />