<SPAN name="link2H_4_0002" id="link2H_4_0002"></SPAN>
<h2> AUTHOR'S NOTE </h2>
<p>On approaching the task of writing this Note for Victory, the first thing
I am conscious of is the actual nearness of the book, its nearness to me
personally, to the vanished mood in which it was written, and to the mixed
feelings aroused by the critical notices the book obtained when first
published almost exactly a year after the beginning of the war. The
writing of it was finished in 1914 long before the murder of an Austrian
Archduke sounded the first note of warning for a world already full of
doubts and fears.</p>
<p>The contemporaneous very short Author's Note which is preserved in this
edition bears sufficient witness to the feelings with which I consented to
the publication of the book. The fact of the book having been published in
the United States early in the year made it difficult to delay its
appearance in England any longer. It came out in the thirteenth month of
the war, and my conscience was troubled by the awful incongruity of
throwing this bit of imagined drama into the welter of reality, tragic
enough in all conscience, but even more cruel than tragic and more
inspiring than cruel. It seemed awfully presumptuous to think there would
be eyes to spare for those pages in a community which in the crash of the
big guns and in the din of brave words expressing the truth of an
indomitable faith could not but feel the edge of a sharp knife at its
throat.</p>
<p>The unchanging Man of history is wonderfully adaptable both by his power
of endurance and in his capacity for detachment. The fact seems to be that
the play of his destiny is too great for his fears and too mysterious for
his understanding. Were the trump of the Last Judgement to sound suddenly
on a working day the musician at his piano would go on with his
performance of Beethoven's sonata and the cobbler at his stall stick to
his last in undisturbed confidence in the virtues of the leather. And with
perfect propriety. For what are we to let ourselves be disturbed by an
angel's vengeful music too mighty for our ears and too awful for our
terrors? Thus it happens to us to be struck suddenly by the lightning of
wrath. The reader will go on reading if the book pleases him and the
critic will go on criticizing with that faculty of detachment born perhaps
from a sense of infinite littleness and which is yet the only faculty that
seems to assimilate man to the immortal gods.</p>
<p>It is only when the catastrophe matches the natural obscurity of our fate
that even the best representative of the race is liable to lose his
detachment. It is very obvious that on the arrival of the gentlemanly Mr.
Jones, the single-minded Ricardo, and the faithful Pedro, Heyst, the man
of universal detachment, loses his mental self-possession, that fine
attitude before the universally irremediable which wears the name of
stoicism. It is all a matter of proportion. There should have been a
remedy for that sort of thing. And yet there is no remedy. Behind this
minute instance of life's hazards Heyst sees the power of blind destiny.
Besides, Heyst in his fine detachment had lost the habit of asserting
himself. I don't mean the courage of self-assertion, either moral or
physical, but the mere way of it, the trick of the thing, the readiness of
mind and the turn of the hand that come without reflection and lead the
man to excellence in life, in art, in crime, in virtue, and, for the
matter of that, even in love. Thinking is the great enemy of perfection.
The habit of profound reflection, I am compelled to say, is the most
pernicious of all the habits formed by the civilized man.</p>
<p>But I wouldn't be suspected even remotely of making fun of Axel Heyst. I
have always liked him. The flesh-and-blood individual who stands behind
the infinitely more familiar figure of the book I remember as a mysterious
Swede right enough. Whether he was a baron, too, I am not so certain. He
himself never laid claim to that distinction. His detachment was too great
to make any claims, big or small, on one's credulity. I will not say where
I met him because I fear to give my readers a wrong impression, since a
marked incongruity between a man and his surroundings is often a very
misleading circumstance. We became very friendly for a time, and I would
not like to expose him to unpleasant suspicions though, personally, I am
sure he would have been indifferent to suspicions as he was indifferent to
all the other disadvantages of life. He was not the whole Heyst of course;
he is only the physical and moral foundation of my Heyst laid on the
ground of a short acquaintance. That it was short was certainly not my
fault for he had charmed me by the mere amenity of his detachment which,
in this case, I cannot help thinking he had carried to excess. He went
away from his rooms without leaving a trace. I wondered where he had gone
to—but now I know. He vanished from my ken only to drift into this
adventure that, unavoidable, waited for him in a world which he persisted
in looking upon as a malevolent shadow spinning in the sunlight. Often in
the course of years an expressed sentiment, the particular sense of a
phrase heard casually, would recall him to my mind so that I have fastened
on to him many words heard on other men's lips and belonging to other
men's less perfect, less pathetic moods.</p>
<p>The same observation will apply mutatis mutandis to Mr. Jones, who is
built on a much slenderer connection. Mr. Jones (or whatever his name was)
did not drift away from me. He turned his back on me and walked out of the
room. It was in a little hotel in the island of St. Thomas in the West
Indies (in the year '75) where we found him one hot afternoon extended on
three chairs, all alone in the loud buzzing of flies to which his
immobility and his cadaverous aspect gave a most gruesome significance.
Our invasion must have displeased him because he got off the chairs
brusquely and walked out, leaving with me an indelibly weird impression of
his thin shanks. One of the men with me said that the fellow was the most
desperate gambler he had ever come across. I said: "A professional
sharper?" and got for an answer: "He's a terror; but I must say that up to
a certain point he will play fair. . . ." I wonder what the point was. I
never saw him again because I believe he went straight on board a
mail-boat which left within the hour for other ports of call in the
direction of Aspinall. Mr. Jones's characteristic insolence belongs to
another man of a quite different type. I will say nothing as to the
origins of his mentality because I don't intend to make any damaging
admissions.</p>
<p>It so happened that the very same year Ricardo—the physical Ricardo—was
a fellow passenger of mine on board an extremely small and extremely dirty
little schooner, during a four days' passage between two places in the
Gulf of Mexico whose names don't matter. For the most part he lay on deck
aft as it were at my feet, and raising himself from time to time on his
elbow would talk about himself and go on talking, not exactly to me or
even at me (he would not even look up but kept his eyes fixed on the deck)
but more as if communing in a low voice with his familiar devil. Now and
then he would give me a glance and make the hairs of his stiff little
moustache stir quaintly. His eyes were green and every cat I see to this
day reminds me of the exact contour of his face. What he was travelling
for or what was his business in life he never confided to me. Truth to
say, the only passenger on board that schooner who could have talked
openly about his activities and purposes was a very snuffy and
conversationally delightful friar, the superior of a convent, attended by
a very young lay brother, of a particularly ferocious countenance. We had
with us also, lying prostrate in the dark and unspeakable cuddy of that
schooner, an old Spanish gentleman, owner of much luggage and, as Ricardo
assured me, very ill indeed. Ricardo seemed to be either a servant or the
confidant of that aged and distinguished-looking invalid, who early on the
passage held a long murmured conversation with the friar, and after that
did nothing but groan feebly, smoke cigarettes, and now and then call for
Martin in a voice full of pain. Then he who had become Ricardo in the book
would go below into that beastly and noisome hole, remain there
mysteriously, and coming up on deck again with a face on which nothing
could be read, would as likely as not resume for my edification the
exposition of his moral attitude towards life illustrated by striking
particular instances of the most atrocious complexion. Did he mean to
frighten me? Or seduce me? Or astonish me? Or arouse my admiration? All he
did was to arouse my amused incredulity. As scoundrels go he was far from
being a bore. For the rest my innocence was so great then that I could not
take his philosophy seriously. All the time he kept one ear turned to the
cuddy in the manner of a devoted servant, but I had the idea that in some
way or other he had imposed the connection on the invalid for some end of
his own. The reader, therefore, won't be surprised to hear that one
morning I was told without any particular emotion by the padrone of the
schooner that the "rich man" down there was dead: He had died in the
night. I don't remember ever being so moved by the desolate end of a
complete stranger. I looked down the skylight, and there was the devoted
Martin busy cording cowhide trunks belonging to the deceased whose white
beard and hooked nose were the only parts I could make out in the dark
depths of a horrible stuffy bunk.</p>
<p>As it fell calm in the course of the afternoon and continued calm during
all that night and the terrible, flaming day, the late "rich man" had to
be thrown overboard at sunset, though as a matter of fact we were in sight
of the low pestilential mangrove-lined coast of our destination. The
excellent Father Superior mentioned to me with an air of immense
commiseration: "The poor man has left a young daughter." Who was to look
after her I don't know, but I saw the devoted Martin taking the trunks
ashore with great care just before I landed myself. I would perhaps have
tracked the ways of that man of immense sincerity for a little while, but
I had some of my own very pressing business to attend to, which in the end
got mixed up with an earthquake and so I had no time to give to Ricardo.
The reader need not be told that I have not forgotten him, though.</p>
<p>My contact with the faithful Pedro was much shorter and my observation of
him was less complete but incomparably more anxious. It ended in a sudden
inspiration to get out of his way. It was in a hovel of sticks and mats by
the side of a path. As I went in there only to ask for a bottle of
lemonade I have not to this day the slightest idea what in my appearance
or actions could have roused his terrible ire. It became manifest to me
less than two minutes after I had set eyes on him for the first time, and
though immensely surprised of course I didn't stop to think it out I took
the nearest short cut—through the wall. This bestial apparition and
a certain enormous buck nigger encountered in Haiti only a couple of
months afterwards, have fixed my conception of blind, furious, unreasoning
rage, as manifested in the human animal, to the end of my days. Of the
nigger I used to dream for years afterwards. Of Pedro never. The
impression was less vivid. I got away from him too quickly.</p>
<p>It seems to me but natural that those three buried in a corner of my
memory should suddenly get out into the light of the world—so
natural that I offer no excuse for their existence, They were there, they
had to come out; and this is a sufficient excuse for a writer of tales who
had taken to his trade without preparation, or premeditation, and without
any moral intention but that which pervades the whole scheme of this world
of senses.</p>
<p>Since this Note is mostly concerned with personal contacts and the origins
of the persons in the tale, I am bound also to speak of Lena, because if I
were to leave her out it would look like a slight; and nothing would be
further from my thoughts than putting a slight on Lena. If of all the
personages involved in the "mystery of Samburan" I have lived longest with
Heyst (or with him I call Heyst) it was at her, whom I call Lena, that I
have looked the longest and with a most sustained attention. This
attention originated in idleness for which I have a natural talent. One
evening I wandered into a cafe, in a town not of the tropics but of the
South of France. It was filled with tobacco smoke, the hum of voices, the
rattling of dominoes, and the sounds of strident music. The orchestra was
rather smaller than the one that performed at Schomberg's hotel, had the
air more of a family party than of an enlisted band, and, I must confess,
seemed rather more respectable than the Zangiacomo musical enterprise. It
was less pretentious also, more homely and familiar, so to speak, insomuch
that in the intervals when all the performers left the platform one of
them went amongst the marble tables collecting offerings of sous and
francs in a battered tin receptacle recalling the shape of a sauceboat. It
was a girl. Her detachment from her task seems to me now to have equalled
or even surpassed Heyst's aloofness from all the mental degradations to
which a man's intelligence is exposed in its way through life. Silent and
wide-eyed she went from table to table with the air of a sleep-walker and
with no other sound but the slight rattle of the coins to attract
attention. It was long after the sea-chapter of my life had been closed
but it is difficult to discard completely the characteristics of half a
lifetime, and it was in something of the Jack-ashore spirit that I dropped
a five-franc piece into the sauceboat; whereupon the sleep-walker turned
her head to gaze at me and said "Merci, Monsieur" in a tone in which there
was no gratitude but only surprise. I must have been idle indeed to take
the trouble to remark on such slight evidence that the voice was very
charming and when the performers resumed their seats I shifted my position
slightly in order not to have that particular performer hidden from me by
the little man with the beard who conducted, and who might for all I know
have been her father, but whose real mission in life was to be a model for
the Zangiacomo of Victory. Having got a clear line of sight I naturally
(being idle) continued to look at the girl through all the second part of
the programme. The shape of her dark head inclined over the violin was
fascinating, and, while resting between the pieces of that interminable
programme she was, in her white dress and with her brown hands reposing in
her lap, the very image of dreamy innocence. The mature, bad-tempered
woman at the piano might have been her mother, though there was not the
slightest resemblance between them. All I am certain of in their personal
relation to each other is that cruel pinch on the upper part of the arm.
That I am sure I have seen! There could be no mistake. I was in too idle a
mood to imagine such a gratuitous barbarity. It may have been playfulness,
yet the girl jumped up as if she had been stung by a wasp. It may have
been playfulness. Yet I saw plainly poor "dreamy innocence" rub gently the
affected place as she filed off with the other performers down the middle
aisle between the marble tables in the uproar of voices, the rattling of
dominoes through a blue atmosphere of tobacco smoke. I believe that those
people left the town next day.</p>
<p>Or perhaps they had only migrated to the other big cafe, on the other side
of the Place de la Comedie. It is very possible. I did not go across to
find out. It was my perfect idleness that had invested the girl with a
peculiar charm, and I did not want to destroy it by any superfluous
exertion. The receptivity of my indolence made the impression so permanent
that when the moment came for her meeting with Heyst I felt that she would
be heroically equal to every demand of the risky and uncertain future. I
was so convinced of it that I let her go with Heyst, I won't say without a
pang but certainly without misgivings. And in view of her triumphant end
what more could I have done for her rehabilitation and her happiness?</p>
<p>1920. J. C. <br/> <br/></p>
<hr />
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />