<p><SPAN name="link2HCH0025" id="link2HCH0025"></SPAN></p>
<h2> CHAPTER XXV </h2>
<p><i>Twentieth and Twenty-first Years of the War—Intrigues of
Alcibiades—Withdrawal of the Persian Subsidies—Oligarchical
Coup d'Etat at Athens—Patriotism of the Army at Samos</i></p>
<p>The Peloponnesians now determined to sail to Rhodes, upon the invitation
of some of the principal men there, hoping to gain an island powerful by
the number of its seamen and by its land forces, and also thinking that
they would be able to maintain their fleet from their own confederacy,
without having to ask for money from Tissaphernes. They accordingly at
once set sail that same winter from Cnidus, and first put in with
ninety-four ships at Camirus in the Rhodian country, to the great alarm of
the mass of the inhabitants, who were not privy to the intrigue, and who
consequently fled, especially as the town was unfortified. They were
afterwards, however, assembled by the Lacedaemonians together with the
inhabitants of the two other towns of Lindus and Ialysus; and the Rhodians
were persuaded to revolt from the Athenians and the island went over to
the Peloponnesians. Meanwhile the Athenians had received the alarm and set
sail with the fleet from Samos to forestall them, and came within sight of
the island, but being a little too late sailed off for the moment to
Chalce, and from thence to Samos, and subsequently waged war against
Rhodes, issuing from Chalce, Cos, and Samos.</p>
<p>The Peloponnesians now levied a contribution of thirty-two talents from
the Rhodians, after which they hauled their ships ashore and for eighty
days remained inactive. During this time, and even earlier, before they
removed to Rhodes, the following intrigues took place. After the death of
Chalcideus and the battle at Miletus, Alcibiades began to be suspected by
the Peloponnesians; and Astyochus received from Lacedaemon an order from
them to put him to death, he being the personal enemy of Agis, and in
other respects thought unworthy of confidence. Alcibiades in his alarm
first withdrew to Tissaphernes, and immediately began to do all he could
with him to injure the Peloponnesian cause. Henceforth becoming his
adviser in everything, he cut down the pay from an Attic drachma to three
obols a day, and even this not paid too regularly; and told Tissaphernes
to say to the Peloponnesians that the Athenians, whose maritime experience
was of an older date than their own, only gave their men three obols, not
so much from poverty as to prevent their seamen being corrupted by being
too well off, and injuring their condition by spending money upon
enervating indulgences, and also paid their crews irregularly in order to
have a security against their deserting in the arrears which they would
leave behind them. He also told Tissaphernes to bribe the captains and
generals of the cities, and so to obtain their connivance—an
expedient which succeeded with all except the Syracusans, Hermocrates
alone opposing him on behalf of the whole confederacy. Meanwhile the
cities asking for money Alcibiades sent off, by roundly telling them in
the name of Tissaphernes that it was great impudence in the Chians, the
richest people in Hellas, not content with being defended by a foreign
force, to expect others to risk not only their lives but their money as
well in behalf of their freedom; while the other cities, he said, had had
to pay largely to Athens before their rebellion, and could not justly
refuse to contribute as much or even more now for their own selves. He
also pointed out that Tissaphernes was at present carrying on the war at
his own charges, and had good cause for economy, but that as soon as he
received remittances from the king he would give them their pay in full
and do what was reasonable for the cities.</p>
<p>Alcibiades further advised Tissaphernes not to be in too great a hurry to
end the war, or to let himself be persuaded to bring up the Phoenician
fleet which he was equipping, or to provide pay for more Hellenes, and
thus put the power by land and sea into the same hands; but to leave each
of the contending parties in possession of one element, thus enabling the
king when he found one troublesome to call in the other. For if the
command of the sea and land were united in one hand, he would not know
where to turn for help to overthrow the dominant power; unless he at last
chose to stand up himself, and go through with the struggle at great
expense and hazard. The cheapest plan was to let the Hellenes wear each
other out, at a small share of the expense and without risk to himself.
Besides, he would find the Athenians the most convenient partners in
empire as they did not aim at conquests on shore, and carried on the war
upon principles and with a practice most advantageous to the King; being
prepared to combine to conquer the sea for Athens, and for the King all
the Hellenes inhabiting his country, whom the Peloponnesians, on the
contrary, had come to liberate. Now it was not likely that the
Lacedaemonians would free the Hellenes from the Hellenic Athenians,
without freeing them also from the barbarian Mede, unless overthrown by
him in the meanwhile. Alcibiades therefore urged him to wear them both out
at first, and, after docking the Athenian power as much as he could,
forthwith to rid the country of the Peloponnesians. In the main
Tissaphernes approved of this policy, so far at least as could be
conjectured from his behaviour; since he now gave his confidence to
Alcibiades in recognition of his good advice, and kept the Peloponnesians
short of money, and would not let them fight at sea, but ruined their
cause by pretending that the Phoenician fleet would arrive, and that they
would thus be enabled to contend with the odds in their favour, and so
made their navy lose its efficiency, which had been very remarkable, and
generally betrayed a coolness in the war that was too plain to be
mistaken.</p>
<p>Alcibiades gave this advice to Tissaphernes and the King, with whom he
then was, not merely because he thought it really the best, but because he
was studying means to effect his restoration to his country, well knowing
that if he did not destroy it he might one day hope to persuade the
Athenians to recall him, and thinking that his best chance of persuading
them lay in letting them see that he possessed the favour of Tissaphernes.
The event proved him to be right. When the Athenians at Samos found that
he had influence with Tissaphernes, principally of their own motion
(though partly also through Alcibiades himself sending word to their chief
men to tell the best men in the army that, if there were only an oligarchy
in the place of the rascally democracy that had banished him, he would be
glad to return to his country and to make Tissaphernes their friend), the
captains and chief men in the armament at once embraced the idea of
subverting the democracy.</p>
<p>The design was first mooted in the camp, and afterwards from thence
reached the city. Some persons crossed over from Samos and had an
interview with Alcibiades, who immediately offered to make first
Tissaphernes, and afterwards the King, their friend, if they would give up
the democracy and make it possible for the King to trust them. The higher
class, who also suffered most severely from the war, now conceived great
hopes of getting the government into their own hands, and of triumphing
over the enemy. Upon their return to Samos the emissaries formed their
partisans into a club, and openly told the mass of the armament that the
King would be their friend, and would provide them with money, if
Alcibiades were restored and the democracy abolished. The multitude, if at
first irritated by these intrigues, were nevertheless kept quiet by the
advantageous prospect of the pay from the King; and the oligarchical
conspirators, after making this communication to the people, now
re-examined the proposals of Alcibiades among themselves, with most of
their associates. Unlike the rest, who thought them advantageous and
trustworthy, Phrynichus, who was still general, by no means approved of
the proposals. Alcibiades, he rightly thought, cared no more for an
oligarchy than for a democracy, and only sought to change the institutions
of his country in order to get himself recalled by his associates; while
for themselves their one object should be to avoid civil discord. It was
not the King's interest, when the Peloponnesians were now their equals at
sea, and in possession of some of the chief cities in his empire, to go
out of his way to side with the Athenians whom he did not trust, when he
might make friends of the Peloponnesians who had never injured him. And as
for the allied states to whom oligarchy was now offered, because the
democracy was to be put down at Athens, he well knew that this would not
make the rebels come in any the sooner, or confirm the loyal in their
allegiance; as the allies would never prefer servitude with an oligarchy
or democracy to freedom with the constitution which they actually enjoyed,
to whichever type it belonged. Besides, the cities thought that the
so-called better classes would prove just as oppressive as the commons, as
being those who originated, proposed, and for the most part benefited from
the acts of the commons injurious to the confederates. Indeed, if it
depended on the better classes, the confederates would be put to death
without trial and with violence; while the commons were their refuge and
the chastiser of these men. This he positively knew that the cities had
learned by experience, and that such was their opinion. The propositions
of Alcibiades, and the intrigues now in progress, could therefore never
meet with his approval.</p>
<p>However, the members of the club assembled, agreeably to their original
determination, accepted what was proposed, and prepared to send Pisander
and others on an embassy to Athens to treat for the restoration of
Alcibiades and the abolition of the democracy in the city, and thus to
make Tissaphernes the friend of the Athenians.</p>
<p>Phrynichus now saw that there would be a proposal to restore Alcibiades,
and that the Athenians would consent to it; and fearing after what he had
said against it that Alcibiades, if restored, would revenge himself upon
him for his opposition, had recourse to the following expedient. He sent a
secret letter to the Lacedaemonian admiral Astyochus, who was still in the
neighbourhood of Miletus, to tell him that Alcibiades was ruining their
cause by making Tissaphernes the friend of the Athenians, and containing
an express revelation of the rest of the intrigue, desiring to be excused
if he sought to harm his enemy even at the expense of the interests of his
country. However, Astyochus, instead of thinking of punishing Alcibiades,
who, besides, no longer ventured within his reach as formerly, went up to
him and Tissaphernes at Magnesia, communicated to them the letter from
Samos, and turned informer, and, if report may be trusted, became the paid
creature of Tissaphernes, undertaking to inform him as to this and all
other matters; which was also the reason why he did not remonstrate more
strongly against the pay not being given in full. Upon this Alcibiades
instantly sent to the authorities at Samos a letter against Phrynichus,
stating what he had done, and requiring that he should be put to death.
Phrynichus distracted, and placed in the utmost peril by the denunciation,
sent again to Astyochus, reproaching him with having so ill kept the
secret of his previous letter, and saying that he was now prepared to give
them an opportunity of destroying the whole Athenian armament at Samos;
giving a detailed account of the means which he should employ, Samos being
unfortified, and pleading that, being in danger of his life on their
account, he could not now be blamed for doing this or anything else to
escape being destroyed by his mortal enemies. This also Astyochus revealed
to Alcibiades.</p>
<p>Meanwhile Phrynichus having had timely notice that he was playing him
false, and that a letter on the subject was on the point of arriving from
Alcibiades, himself anticipated the news, and told the army that the
enemy, seeing that Samos was unfortified and the fleet not all stationed
within the harbour, meant to attack the camp, that he could be certain of
this intelligence, and that they must fortify Samos as quickly as
possible, and generally look to their defences. It will be remembered that
he was general, and had himself authority to carry out these measures.
Accordingly they addressed themselves to the work of fortification, and
Samos was thus fortified sooner than it would otherwise have been. Not
long afterwards came the letter from Alcibiades, saying that the army was
betrayed by Phrynichus, and the enemy about to attack it. Alcibiades,
however, gained no credit, it being thought that he was in the secret of
the enemy's designs, and had tried to fasten them upon Phrynichus, and to
make out that he was their accomplice, out of hatred; and consequently far
from hurting him he rather bore witness to what he had said by this
intelligence.</p>
<p>After this Alcibiades set to work to persuade Tissaphernes to become the
friend of the Athenians. Tissaphernes, although afraid of the
Peloponnesians because they had more ships in Asia than the Athenians, was
yet disposed to be persuaded if he could, especially after his quarrel
with the Peloponnesians at Cnidus about the treaty of Therimenes. The
quarrel had already taken place, as the Peloponnesians were by this time
actually at Rhodes; and in it the original argument of Alcibiades touching
the liberation of all the towns by the Lacedaemonians had been verified by
the declaration of Lichas that it was impossible to submit to a convention
which made the King master of all the states at any former time ruled by
himself or by his fathers.</p>
<p>While Alcibiades was besieging the favour of Tissaphernes with an
earnestness proportioned to the greatness of the issue, the Athenian
envoys who had been dispatched from Samos with Pisander arrived at Athens,
and made a speech before the people, giving a brief summary of their
views, and particularly insisting that, if Alcibiades were recalled and
the democratic constitution changed, they could have the King as their
ally, and would be able to overcome the Peloponnesians. A number of
speakers opposed them on the question of the democracy, the enemies of
Alcibiades cried out against the scandal of a restoration to be effected
by a violation of the constitution, and the Eumolpidae and Ceryces
protested in behalf of the mysteries, the cause of his banishment, and
called upon the gods to avert his recall; when Pisander, in the midst of
much opposition and abuse, came forward, and taking each of his opponents
aside asked him the following question: In the face of the fact that the
Peloponnesians had as many ships as their own confronting them at sea,
more cities in alliance with them, and the King and Tissaphernes to supply
them with money, of which the Athenians had none left, had he any hope of
saving the state, unless someone could induce the King to come over to
their side? Upon their replying that they had not, he then plainly said to
them: "This we cannot have unless we have a more moderate form of
government, and put the offices into fewer hands, and so gain the King's
confidence, and forthwith restore Alcibiades, who is the only man living
that can bring this about. The safety of the state, not the form of its
government, is for the moment the most pressing question, as we can always
change afterwards whatever we do not like."</p>
<p>The people were at first highly irritated at the mention of an oligarchy,
but upon understanding clearly from Pisander that this was the only
resource left, they took counsel of their fears, and promised themselves
some day to change the government again, and gave way. They accordingly
voted that Pisander should sail with ten others and make the best
arrangement that they could with Tissaphernes and Alcibiades. At the same
time the people, upon a false accusation of Pisander, dismissed Phrynichus
from his post together with his colleague Scironides, sending Diomedon and
Leon to replace them in the command of the fleet. The accusation was that
Phrynichus had betrayed Iasus and Amorges; and Pisander brought it because
he thought him a man unfit for the business now in hand with Alcibiades.
Pisander also went the round of all the clubs already existing in the city
for help in lawsuits and elections, and urged them to draw together and to
unite their efforts for the overthrow of the democracy; and after taking
all other measures required by the circumstances, so that no time might be
lost, set off with his ten companions on his voyage to Tissaphernes.</p>
<p>In the same winter Leon and Diomedon, who had by this time joined the
fleet, made an attack upon Rhodes. The ships of the Peloponnesians they
found hauled up on shore, and, after making a descent upon the coast and
defeating the Rhodians who appeared in the field against them, withdrew to
Chalce and made that place their base of operations instead of Cos, as
they could better observe from thence if the Peloponnesian fleet put out
to sea. Meanwhile Xenophantes, a Laconian, came to Rhodes from Pedaritus
at Chios, with the news that the fortification of the Athenians was now
finished, and that, unless the whole Peloponnesian fleet came to the
rescue, the cause in Chios must be lost. Upon this they resolved to go to
his relief. In the meantime Pedaritus, with the mercenaries that he had
with him and the whole force of the Chians, made an assault upon the work
round the Athenian ships and took a portion of it, and got possession of
some vessels that were hauled up on shore, when the Athenians sallied out
to the rescue, and first routing the Chians, next defeated the remainder
of the force round Pedaritus, who was himself killed, with many of the
Chians, a great number of arms being also taken.</p>
<p>After this the Chians were besieged even more straitly than before by land
and sea, and the famine in the place was great. Meanwhile the Athenian
envoys with Pisander arrived at the court of Tissaphernes, and conferred
with him about the proposed agreement. However, Alcibiades, not being
altogether sure of Tissaphernes (who feared the Peloponnesians more than
the Athenians, and besides wished to wear out both parties, as Alcibiades
himself had recommended), had recourse to the following stratagem to make
the treaty between the Athenians and Tissaphernes miscarry by reason of
the magnitude of his demands. In my opinion Tissaphernes desired this
result, fear being his motive; while Alcibiades, who now saw that
Tissaphernes was determined not to treat on any terms, wished the
Athenians to think, not that he was unable to persuade Tissaphernes, but
that after the latter had been persuaded and was willing to join them,
they had not conceded enough to him. For the demands of Alcibiades,
speaking for Tissaphernes, who was present, were so extravagant that the
Athenians, although for a long while they agreed to whatever he asked, yet
had to bear the blame of failure: he required the cession of the whole of
Ionia, next of the islands adjacent, besides other concessions, and these
passed without opposition; at last, in the third interview, Alcibiades,
who now feared a complete discovery of his inability, required them to
allow the King to build ships and sail along his own coast wherever and
with as many as he pleased. Upon this the Athenians would yield no
further, and concluding that there was nothing to be done, but that they
had been deceived by Alcibiades, went away in a passion and proceeded to
Samos.</p>
<p>Tissaphernes immediately after this, in the same winter, proceeded along
shore to Caunus, desiring to bring the Peloponnesian fleet back to
Miletus, and to supply them with pay, making a fresh convention upon such
terms as he could get, in order not to bring matters to an absolute breach
between them. He was afraid that if many of their ships were left without
pay they would be compelled to engage and be defeated, or that their
vessels being left without hands the Athenians would attain their objects
without his assistance. Still more he feared that the Peloponnesians might
ravage the continent in search of supplies. Having calculated and
considered all this, agreeably to his plan of keeping the two sides equal,
he now sent for the Peloponnesians and gave them pay, and concluded with
them a third treaty in words following:</p>
<p>In the thirteenth year of the reign of Darius, while Alexippidas was ephor
at Lacedaemon, a convention was concluded in the plain of the Maeander by
the Lacedaemonians and their allies with Tissaphernes, Hieramenes, and the
sons of Pharnaces, concerning the affairs of the King and of the
Lacedaemonians and their allies.</p>
<p>1. The country of the King in Asia shall be the King's, and the King shall
treat his own country as he pleases.</p>
<p>2. The Lacedaemonians and their allies shall not invade or injure the
King's country: neither shall the King invade or injure that of the
Lacedaemonians or of their allies. If any of the Lacedaemonians or of
their allies invade or injure the King's country, the Lacedaemonians and
their allies shall prevent it: and if any from the King's country invade
or injure the country of the Lacedaemonians or of their allies, the King
shall prevent it.</p>
<p>3. Tissaphernes shall provide pay for the ships now present, according to
the agreement, until the arrival of the King's vessels: but after the
arrival of the King's vessels the Lacedaemonians and their allies may pay
their own ships if they wish it. If, however, they choose to receive the
pay from Tissaphernes, Tissaphernes shall furnish it: and the
Lacedaemonians and their allies shall repay him at the end of the war such
moneys as they shall have received.</p>
<p>4. After the vessels have arrived, the ships of the Lacedaemonians and of
their allies and those of the King shall carry on the war jointly,
according as Tissaphernes and the Lacedaemonians and their allies shall
think best. If they wish to make peace with the Athenians, they shall make
peace also jointly.</p>
<p>This was the treaty. After this Tissaphernes prepared to bring up the
Phoenician fleet according to agreement, and to make good his other
promises, or at all events wished to make it appear that he was so
preparing.</p>
<p>Winter was now drawing towards its close, when the Boeotians took Oropus
by treachery, though held by an Athenian garrison. Their accomplices in
this were some of the Eretrians and of the Oropians themselves, who were
plotting the revolt of Euboea, as the place was exactly opposite Eretria,
and while in Athenian hands was necessarily a source of great annoyance to
Eretria and the rest of Euboea. Oropus being in their hands, the Eretrians
now came to Rhodes to invite the Peloponnesians into Euboea. The latter,
however, were rather bent on the relief of the distressed Chians, and
accordingly put out to sea and sailed with all their ships from Rhodes.
Off Triopium they sighted the Athenian fleet out at sea sailing from
Chalce, and, neither attacking the other, arrived, the latter at Samos,
the Peloponnesians at Miletus, seeing that it was no longer possible to
relieve Chios without a battle. And this winter ended, and with it ended
the twentieth year of this war of which Thucydides is the historian.</p>
<p>Early in the spring of the summer following, Dercyllidas, a Spartan, was
sent with a small force by land to the Hellespont to effect the revolt of
Abydos, which is a Milesian colony; and the Chians, while Astyochus was at
a loss how to help them, were compelled to fight at sea by the pressure of
the siege. While Astyochus was still at Rhodes they had received from
Miletus, as their commander after the death of Pedaritus, a Spartan named
Leon, who had come out with Antisthenes, and twelve vessels which had been
on guard at Miletus, five of which were Thurian, four Syracusans, one from
Anaia, one Milesian, and one Leon's own. Accordingly the Chians marched
out in mass and took up a strong position, while thirty-six of their ships
put out and engaged thirty-two of the Athenians; and after a tough fight,
in which the Chians and their allies had rather the best of it, as it was
now late, retired to their city.</p>
<p>Immediately after this Dercyllidas arrived by land from Miletus; and
Abydos in the Hellespont revolted to him and Pharnabazus, and Lampsacus
two days later. Upon receipt of this news Strombichides hastily sailed
from Chios with twenty-four Athenian ships, some transports carrying heavy
infantry being of the number, and defeating the Lampsacenes who came out
against him, took Lampsacus, which was unfortified, at the first assault,
and making prize of the slaves and goods restored the freemen to their
homes, and went on to Abydos. The inhabitants, however, refusing to
capitulate, and his assaults failing to take the place, he sailed over to
the coast opposite, and appointed Sestos, the town in the Chersonese held
by the Medes at a former period in this history, as the centre for the
defence of the whole Hellespont.</p>
<p>In the meantime the Chians commanded the sea more than before; and the
Peloponnesians at Miletus and Astyochus, hearing of the sea-fight and of
the departure of the squadron with Strombichides, took fresh courage.
Coasting along with two vessels to Chios, Astyochus took the ships from
that place, and now moved with the whole fleet upon Samos, from whence,
however, he sailed back to Miletus, as the Athenians did not put out
against him, owing to their suspicions of one another. For it was about
this time, or even before, that the democracy was put down at Athens. When
Pisander and the envoys returned from Tissaphernes to Samos they at once
strengthened still further their interest in the army itself, and
instigated the upper class in Samos to join them in establishing an
oligarchy, the very form of government which a party of them had lately
risen to avoid. At the same time the Athenians at Samos, after a
consultation among themselves, determined to let Alcibiades alone, since
he refused to join them, and besides was not the man for an oligarchy; and
now that they were once embarked, to see for themselves how they could
best prevent the ruin of their cause, and meanwhile to sustain the war,
and to contribute without stint money and all else that might be required
from their own private estates, as they would henceforth labour for
themselves alone.</p>
<p>After encouraging each other in these resolutions, they now at once sent
off half the envoys and Pisander to do what was necessary at Athens (with
instructions to establish oligarchies on their way in all the subject
cities which they might touch at), and dispatched the other half in
different directions to the other dependencies. Diitrephes also, who was
in the neighbourhood of Chios, and had been elected to the command of the
Thracian towns, was sent off to his government, and arriving at Thasos
abolished the democracy there. Two months, however, had not elapsed after
his departure before the Thasians began to fortify their town, being
already tired of an aristocracy with Athens, and in daily expectation of
freedom from Lacedaemon. Indeed there was a party of them (whom the
Athenians had banished), with the Peloponnesians, who with their friends
in the town were already making every exertion to bring a squadron, and to
effect the revolt of Thasos; and this party thus saw exactly what they
most wanted done, that is to say, the reformation of the government
without risk, and the abolition of the democracy which would have opposed
them. Things at Thasos thus turned out just the contrary to what the
oligarchical conspirators at Athens expected; and the same in my opinion
was the case in many of the other dependencies; as the cities no sooner
got a moderate government and liberty of action, than they went on to
absolute freedom without being at all seduced by the show of reform
offered by the Athenians.</p>
<p>Pisander and his colleagues on their voyage alongshore abolished, as had
been determined, the democracies in the cities, and also took some heavy
infantry from certain places as their allies, and so came to Athens. Here
they found most of the work already done by their associates. Some of the
younger men had banded together, and secretly assassinated one Androcles,
the chief leader of the commons, and mainly responsible for the banishment
of Alcibiades; Androcles being singled out both because he was a popular
leader and because they sought by his death to recommend themselves to
Alcibiades, who was, as they supposed, to be recalled, and to make
Tissaphernes their friend. There were also some other obnoxious persons
whom they secretly did away with in the same manner. Meanwhile their cry
in public was that no pay should be given except to persons serving in the
war, and that not more than five thousand should share in the government,
and those such as were most able to serve the state in person and in
purse.</p>
<p>But this was a mere catchword for the multitude, as the authors of the
revolution were really to govern. However, the Assembly and the Council of
the Bean still met notwithstanding, although they discussed nothing that
was not approved of by the conspirators, who both supplied the speakers
and reviewed in advance what they were to say. Fear, and the sight of the
numbers of the conspirators, closed the mouths of the rest; or if any
ventured to rise in opposition, he was presently put to death in some
convenient way, and there was neither search for the murderers nor justice
to be had against them if suspected; but the people remained motionless,
being so thoroughly cowed that men thought themselves lucky to escape
violence, even when they held their tongues. An exaggerated belief in the
numbers of the conspirators also demoralized the people, rendered helpless
by the magnitude of the city, and by their want of intelligence with each
other, and being without means of finding out what those numbers really
were. For the same reason it was impossible for any one to open his grief
to a neighbour and to concert measures to defend himself, as he would have
had to speak either to one whom he did not know, or whom he knew but did
not trust. Indeed all the popular party approached each other with
suspicion, each thinking his neighbour concerned in what was going on, the
conspirators having in their ranks persons whom no one could ever have
believed capable of joining an oligarchy; and these it was who made the
many so suspicious, and so helped to procure impunity for the few, by
confirming the commons in their mistrust of one another.</p>
<p>At this juncture arrived Pisander and his colleagues, who lost no time in
doing the rest. First they assembled the people, and moved to elect ten
commissioners with full powers to frame a constitution, and that when this
was done they should on an appointed day lay before the people their
opinion as to the best mode of governing the city. Afterwards, when the
day arrived, the conspirators enclosed the assembly in Colonus, a temple
of Poseidon, a little more than a mile outside the city; when the
commissioners simply brought forward this single motion, that any Athenian
might propose with impunity whatever measure he pleased, heavy penalties
being imposed upon any who should indict for illegality, or otherwise
molest him for so doing. The way thus cleared, it was now plainly declared
that all tenure of office and receipt of pay under the existing
institutions were at an end, and that five men must be elected as
presidents, who should in their turn elect one hundred, and each of the
hundred three apiece; and that this body thus made up to four hundred
should enter the council chamber with full powers and govern as they
judged best, and should convene the five thousand whenever they pleased.</p>
<p>The man who moved this resolution was Pisander, who was throughout the
chief ostensible agent in putting down the democracy. But he who concerted
the whole affair, and prepared the way for the catastrophe, and who had
given the greatest thought to the matter, was Antiphon, one of the best
men of his day in Athens; who, with a head to contrive measures and a
tongue to recommend them, did not willingly come forward in the assembly
or upon any public scene, being ill looked upon by the multitude owing to
his reputation for talent; and who yet was the one man best able to aid in
the courts, or before the assembly, the suitors who required his opinion.
Indeed, when he was afterwards himself tried for his life on the charge of
having been concerned in setting up this very government, when the Four
Hundred were overthrown and hardly dealt with by the commons, he made what
would seem to be the best defence of any known up to my time. Phrynichus
also went beyond all others in his zeal for the oligarchy. Afraid of
Alcibiades, and assured that he was no stranger to his intrigues with
Astyochus at Samos, he held that no oligarchy was ever likely to restore
him, and once embarked in the enterprise, proved, where danger was to be
faced, by far the staunchest of them all. Theramenes, son of Hagnon, was
also one of the foremost of the subverters of the democracy—a man as
able in council as in debate. Conducted by so many and by such sagacious
heads, the enterprise, great as it was, not unnaturally went forward;
although it was no light matter to deprive the Athenian people of its
freedom, almost a hundred years after the deposition of the tyrants, when
it had been not only not subject to any during the whole of that period,
but accustomed during more than half of it to rule over subjects of its
own.</p>
<p>The assembly ratified the proposed constitution, without a single opposing
voice, and was then dissolved; after which the Four Hundred were brought
into the council chamber in the following way. On account of the enemy at
Decelea, all the Athenians were constantly on the wall or in the ranks at
the various military posts. On that day the persons not in the secret were
allowed to go home as usual, while orders were given to the accomplices of
the conspirators to hang about, without making any demonstration, at some
little distance from the posts, and in case of any opposition to what was
being done, to seize the arms and put it down. There were also some
Andrians and Tenians, three hundred Carystians, and some of the settlers
in Aegina come with their own arms for this very purpose, who had received
similar instructions. These dispositions completed, the Four Hundred went,
each with a dagger concealed about his person, accompanied by one hundred
and twenty Hellenic youths, whom they employed wherever violence was
needed, and appeared before the Councillors of the Bean in the council
chamber, and told them to take their pay and be gone; themselves bringing
it for the whole of the residue of their term of office, and giving it to
them as they went out.</p>
<p>Upon the Council withdrawing in this way without venturing any objection,
and the rest of the citizens making no movement, the Four Hundred entered
the council chamber, and for the present contented themselves with drawing
lots for their Prytanes, and making their prayers and sacrifices to the
gods upon entering office, but afterwards departed widely from the
democratic system of government, and except that on account of Alcibiades
they did not recall the exiles, ruled the city by force; putting to death
some men, though not many, whom they thought it convenient to remove, and
imprisoning and banishing others. They also sent to Agis, the
Lacedaemonian king, at Decelea, to say that they desired to make peace,
and that he might reasonably be more disposed to treat now that he had
them to deal with instead of the inconstant commons.</p>
<p>Agis, however, did not believe in the tranquillity of the city, or that
the commons would thus in a moment give up their ancient liberty, but
thought that the sight of a large Lacedaemonian force would be sufficient
to excite them if they were not already in commotion, of which he was by
no means certain. He accordingly gave to the envoys of the Four Hundred an
answer which held out no hopes of an accommodation, and sending for large
reinforcements from Peloponnese, not long afterwards, with these and his
garrison from Decelea, descended to the very walls of Athens; hoping
either that civil disturbances might help to subdue them to his terms, or
that, in the confusion to be expected within and without the city, they
might even surrender without a blow being struck; at all events he thought
he would succeed in seizing the Long Walls, bared of their defenders.
However, the Athenians saw him come close up, without making the least
disturbance within the city; and sending out their cavalry, and a number
of their heavy infantry, light troops, and archers, shot down some of his
soldiers who approached too near, and got possession of some arms and
dead. Upon this Agis, at last convinced, led his army back again and,
remaining with his own troops in the old position at Decelea, sent the
reinforcement back home, after a few days' stay in Attica. After this the
Four Hundred persevering sent another embassy to Agis, and now meeting
with a better reception, at his suggestion dispatched envoys to Lacedaemon
to negotiate a treaty, being desirous of making peace.</p>
<p>They also sent ten men to Samos to reassure the army, and to explain that
the oligarchy was not established for the hurt of the city or the
citizens, but for the salvation of the country at large; and that there
were five thousand, not four hundred only, concerned; although, what with
their expeditions and employments abroad, the Athenians had never yet
assembled to discuss a question important enough to bring five thousand of
them together. The emissaries were also told what to say upon all other
points, and were so sent off immediately after the establishment of the
new government, which feared, as it turned out justly, that the mass of
seamen would not be willing to remain under the oligarchical constitution,
and, the evil beginning there, might be the means of their overthrow.</p>
<p>Indeed at Samos the question of the oligarchy had already entered upon a
new phase, the following events having taken place just at the time that
the Four Hundred were conspiring. That part of the Samian population which
has been mentioned as rising against the upper class, and as being the
democratic party, had now turned round, and yielding to the solicitations
of Pisander during his visit, and of the Athenians in the conspiracy at
Samos, had bound themselves by oaths to the number of three hundred, and
were about to fall upon the rest of their fellow citizens, whom they now
in their turn regarded as the democratic party. Meanwhile they put to
death one Hyperbolus, an Athenian, a pestilent fellow that had been
ostracized, not from fear of his influence or position, but because he was
a rascal and a disgrace to the city; being aided in this by Charminus, one
of the generals, and by some of the Athenians with them, to whom they had
sworn friendship, and with whom they perpetrated other acts of the kind,
and now determined to attack the people. The latter got wind of what was
coming, and told two of the generals, Leon and Diomedon, who, on account
of the credit which they enjoyed with the commons, were unwilling
supporters of the oligarchy; and also Thrasybulus and Thrasyllus, the
former a captain of a galley, the latter serving with the heavy infantry,
besides certain others who had ever been thought most opposed to the
conspirators, entreating them not to look on and see them destroyed, and
Samos, the sole remaining stay of their empire, lost to the Athenians.
Upon hearing this, the persons whom they addressed now went round the
soldiers one by one, and urged them to resist, especially the crew of the
Paralus, which was made up entirely of Athenians and freemen, and had from
time out of mind been enemies of oligarchy, even when there was no such
thing existing; and Leon and Diomedon left behind some ships for their
protection in case of their sailing away anywhere themselves. Accordingly,
when the Three Hundred attacked the people, all these came to the rescue,
and foremost of all the crew of the Paralus; and the Samian commons gained
the victory, and putting to death some thirty of the Three Hundred, and
banishing three others of the ringleaders, accorded an amnesty to the
rest, and lived together under a democratic government for the future.</p>
<p>The ship Paralus, with Chaereas, son of Archestratus, on board, an
Athenian who had taken an active part in the revolution, was now without
loss of time sent off by the Samians and the army to Athens to report what
had occurred; the fact that the Four Hundred were in power not being yet
known. When they sailed into harbour the Four Hundred immediately arrested
two or three of the Parali and, taking the vessel from the rest, shifted
them into a troopship and set them to keep guard round Euboea. Chaereas,
however, managed to secrete himself as soon as he saw how things stood,
and returning to Samos, drew a picture to the soldiers of the horrors
enacting at Athens, in which everything was exaggerated; saying that all
were punished with stripes, that no one could say a word against the
holders of power, that the soldiers' wives and children were outraged, and
that it was intended to seize and shut up the relatives of all in the army
at Samos who were not of the government's way of thinking, to be put to
death in case of their disobedience; besides a host of other injurious
inventions.</p>
<p>On hearing this the first thought of the army was to fall upon the chief
authors of the oligarchy and upon all the rest concerned. Eventually,
however, they desisted from this idea upon the men of moderate views
opposing it and warning them against ruining their cause, with the enemy
close at hand and ready for battle. After this, Thrasybulus, son of Lycus,
and Thrasyllus, the chief leaders in the revolution, now wishing in the
most public manner to change the government at Samos to a democracy, bound
all the soldiers by the most tremendous oaths, and those of the
oligarchical party more than any, to accept a democratic government, to be
united, to prosecute actively the war with the Peloponnesians, and to be
enemies of the Four Hundred, and to hold no communication with them. The
same oath was also taken by all the Samians of full age; and the soldiers
associated the Samians in all their affairs and in the fruits of their
dangers, having the conviction that there was no way of escape for
themselves or for them, but that the success of the Four Hundred or of the
enemy at Miletus must be their ruin.</p>
<p>The struggle now was between the army trying to force a democracy upon the
city, and the Four Hundred an oligarchy upon the camp. Meanwhile the
soldiers forthwith held an assembly, in which they deposed the former
generals and any of the captains whom they suspected, and chose new
captains and generals to replace them, besides Thrasybulus and Thrasyllus,
whom they had already. They also stood up and encouraged one another, and
among other things urged that they ought not to lose heart because the
city had revolted from them, as the party seceding was smaller and in
every way poorer in resources than themselves. They had the whole fleet
with which to compel the other cities in their empire to give them money
just as if they had their base in the capital, having a city in Samos
which, so far from wanting strength, had when at war been within an ace of
depriving the Athenians of the command of the sea, while as far as the
enemy was concerned they had the same base of operations as before.
Indeed, with the fleet in their hands, they were better able to provide
themselves with supplies than the government at home. It was their
advanced position at Samos which had throughout enabled the home
authorities to command the entrance into Piraeus; and if they refused to
give them back the constitution, they would now find that the army was
more in a position to exclude them from the sea than they were to exclude
the army. Besides, the city was of little or no use towards enabling them
to overcome the enemy; and they had lost nothing in losing those who had
no longer either money to send them (the soldiers having to find this for
themselves), or good counsel, which entitles cities to direct armies. On
the contrary, even in this the home government had done wrong in
abolishing the institutions of their ancestors, while the army maintained
the said institutions, and would try to force the home government to do so
likewise. So that even in point of good counsel the camp had as good
counsellors as the city. Moreover, they had but to grant him security for
his person and his recall, and Alcibiades would be only too glad to
procure them the alliance of the King. And above all if they failed
altogether, with the navy which they possessed, they had numbers of places
to retire to in which they would find cities and lands.</p>
<p>Debating together and comforting themselves after this manner, they<br/>
pushed on their war measures as actively as ever; and the ten envoys<br/>
sent to Samos by the Four Hundred, learning how matters stood while they<br/>
were still at Delos, stayed quiet there. About this time a cry arose a<br/>
Peloponnesian fleet at Miletus that Astyochus and Tissaphernes<br/>
were ruining their cause. Astyochus had not been willing to fight at<br/>
sea—either before, while they were still in full vigour and the<br/>
fleet of the Athenians small, or now, when the enemy was, as they were<br/>
informed, in a state of sedition and his ships not yet united—but kept<br/>
them waiting for the Phoenician fleet from Tissaphernes, which had only<br/>
a nominal existence, at the risk of wasting away in inactivity. While<br/>
Tissaphernes not only did not bring up the fleet in question, but was<br/>
ruining their navy by payments made irregularly, and even then not made<br/>
in full. They must therefore, they insisted, delay no longer, but fight<br/>
a decisive naval engagement. The Syracusans were the most urgent of any.<br/></p>
<p>The confederates and Astyochus, aware of these murmurs, had already
decided in council to fight a decisive battle; and when the news reached
them of the disturbance at Samos, they put to sea with all their ships,
one hundred and ten in number, and, ordering the Milesians to move by land
upon Mycale, set sail thither. The Athenians with the eighty-two ships
from Samos were at the moment lying at Glauce in Mycale, a point where
Samos approaches near to the continent; and, seeing the Peloponnesian
fleet sailing against them, retired into Samos, not thinking themselves
numerically strong enough to stake their all upon a battle. Besides, they
had notice from Miletus of the wish of the enemy to engage, and were
expecting to be joined from the Hellespont by Strombichides, to whom a
messenger had been already dispatched, with the ships that had gone from
Chios to Abydos. The Athenians accordingly withdrew to Samos, and the
Peloponnesians put in at Mycale, and encamped with the land forces of the
Milesians and the people of the neighbourhood. The next day they were
about to sail against Samos, when tidings reached them of the arrival of
Strombichides with the squadron from the Hellespont, upon which they
immediately sailed back to Miletus. The Athenians, thus reinforced, now in
their turn sailed against Miletus with a hundred and eight ships, wishing
to fight a decisive battle, but, as no one put out to meet them, sailed
back to Samos.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />