<h2>CHAPTER XXX.</h2>
</center>
<center>
<h3>THE CAMPAIGN AGAINST VICKSBURG—EMPLOYING THE FREEDMEN—OCCUPATION OF HOLLY SPRINGS—SHERMAN ORDERED TO MEMPHIS—SHERMAN'S MOVEMENTS DOWN THE MISSISSIPPI—VAN DORN CAPTURES HOLLY SPRINGS—COLLECTING FORAGE AND FOOD.</h3>
</center>
<br/>
<p>Vicksburg was important to the enemy because it occupied the
first high ground coming close to the river below Memphis. From
there a railroad runs east, connecting with other roads leading to
all points of the Southern States. A railroad also starts from the
opposite side of the river, extending west as far as Shreveport,
Louisiana. Vicksburg was the only channel, at the time of the
events of which this chapter treats, connecting the parts of the
Confederacy divided by the Mississippi. So long as it was held by
the enemy, the free navigation of the river was prevented. Hence
its importance. Points on the river between Vicksburg and Port
Hudson were held as dependencies; but their fall was sure to follow
the capture of the former place.</p>
<p>The campaign against Vicksburg commenced on the 2d of November
as indicated in a dispatch to the general-in-chief in the following
words: "I have commenced a movement on Grand Junction, with three
divisions from Corinth and two from Bolivar. Will leave here
[Jackson, Tennessee] to-morrow, and take command in person. If
found practicable, I will go to Holly Springs, and, may be,
Grenada, completing railroad and telegraph as I go."</p>
<p>At this time my command was holding the Mobile and Ohio railroad
from about twenty-five miles south of Corinth, north to Columbus,
Kentucky; the Mississippi Central from Bolivar north to its
junction with the Mobile and Ohio; the Memphis and Charleston from
Corinth east to Bear Creek, and the Mississippi River from Cairo to
Memphis. My entire command was no more than was necessary to hold
these lines, and hardly that if kept on the defensive. By moving
against the enemy and into his unsubdued, or not yet captured,
territory, driving their army before us, these lines would nearly
hold themselves; thus affording a large force for field operations.
My moving force at that time was about 30,000 men, and I estimated
the enemy confronting me, under Pemberton, at about the same
number. General McPherson commanded my left wing and General C. S.
Hamilton the centre, while Sherman was at Memphis with the right
wing. Pemberton was fortified at the Tallahatchie, but occupied
Holly Springs and Grand Junction on the Mississippi Central
railroad. On the 8th we occupied Grand Junction and La Grange,
throwing a considerable force seven or eight miles south, along the
line of the railroad. The road from Bolivar forward was repaired
and put in running order as the troops advanced.</p>
<p>Up to this time it had been regarded as an axiom in war that
large bodies of troops must operate from a base of supplies which
they always covered and guarded in all forward movements. There was
delay therefore in repairing the road back, and in gathering and
forwarding supplies to the front.</p>
<p>By my orders, and in accordance with previous instructions from
Washington, all the forage within reach was collected under the
supervision of the chief quartermaster and the provisions under the
chief commissary, receipts being given when there was any one to
take them; the supplies in any event to be accounted for as
government stores. The stock was bountiful, but still it gave me no
idea of the possibility of supplying a moving column in an enemy's
country from the country itself.</p>
<p>It was at this point, probably, where the first idea of a
"Freedman's Bureau" took its origin. Orders of the government
prohibited the expulsion of the negroes from the protection of the
army, when they came in voluntarily. Humanity forbade allowing them
to starve. With such an army of them, of all ages and both sexes,
as had congregated about Grand Junction, amounting to many
thousands, it was impossible to advance. There was no special
authority for feeding them unless they were employed as teamsters,
cooks and pioneers with the army; but only able-bodied young men
were suitable for such work. This labor would support but a very
limited percentage of them. The plantations were all deserted; the
cotton and corn were ripe: men, women and children above ten years
of age could be employed in saving these crops. To do this work
with contrabands, or to have it done, organization under a
competent chief was necessary. On inquiring for such a man Chaplain
Eaton, now and for many years the very able United States
Commissioner of Education, was suggested. He proved as efficient in
that field as he has since done in his present one. I gave him all
the assistants and guards he called for. We together fixed the
prices to be paid for the negro labor, whether rendered to the
government or to individuals. The cotton was to be picked from
abandoned plantations, the laborers to receive the stipulated price
(my recollection is twelve and a half cents per pound for picking
and ginning) from the quartermaster, he shipping the cotton north
to be sold for the benefit of the government. Citizens remaining on
their plantations were allowed the privilege of having their crops
saved by freedmen on the same terms.</p>
<p>At once the freedmen became self-sustaining. The money was not
paid to them directly, but was expended judiciously and for their
benefit. They gave me no trouble afterwards.</p>
<p>Later the freedmen were engaged in cutting wood along the
Mississippi River to supply the large number of steamers on that
stream. A good price was paid for chopping wood used for the supply
of government steamers (steamers chartered and which the government
had to supply with fuel). Those supplying their own fuel paid a
much higher price. In this way a fund was created not only
sufficient to feed and clothe all, old and young, male and female,
but to build them comfortable cabins, hospitals for the sick, and
to supply them with many comforts they had never known before.</p>
<p>At this stage of the campaign against Vicksburg I was very much
disturbed by newspaper rumors that General McClernand was to have a
separate and independent command within mine, to operate against
Vicksburg by way of the Mississippi River. Two commanders on the
same field are always one too many, and in this case I did not
think the general selected had either the experience or the
qualifications to fit him for so important a position. I feared for
the safety of the troops intrusted to him, especially as he was to
raise new levies, raw troops, to execute so important a trust. But
on the 12th I received a dispatch from General Halleck saying that
I had command of all the troops sent to my department and
authorizing me to fight the enemy where I pleased. The next day my
cavalry was in Holly Springs, and the enemy fell back south of the
Tallahatchie.</p>
<p>Holly Springs I selected for my depot of supplies and munitions
of war, all of which at that time came by rail from Columbus,
Kentucky, except the few stores collected about La Grange and Grand
Junction. This was a long line (increasing in length as we moved
south) to maintain in an enemy's country. On the 15th of November,
while I was still at Holly Springs, I sent word to Sherman to meet
me at Columbus. We were but forty-seven miles apart, yet the most
expeditious way for us to meet was for me to take the rail to
Columbus and Sherman a steamer for the same place. At that meeting,
besides talking over my general plans I gave him his orders to join
me with two divisions and to march them down the Mississippi
Central railroad if he could. Sherman, who was always prompt, was
up by the 29th to Cottage Hill, ten miles north of Oxford. He
brought three divisions with him, leaving a garrison of only four
regiments of infantry, a couple of pieces of artillery and a small
detachment of cavalry. Further reinforcements he knew were on their
way from the north to Memphis. About this time General Halleck
ordered troops from Helena, Arkansas (territory west of the
Mississippi was not under my command then) to cut the road in
Pemberton's rear. The expedition was under Generals Hovey and C. C.
Washburn and was successful so far as reaching the railroad was
concerned, but the damage done was very slight and was soon
repaired.</p>
<p>The Tallahatchie, which confronted me, was very high, the
railroad bridge destroyed and Pemberton strongly fortified on the
south side. A crossing would have been impossible in the presence
of an enemy. I sent the cavalry higher up the stream and they
secured a crossing. This caused the enemy to evacuate their
position, which was possibly accelerated by the expedition of Hovey
and Washburn. The enemy was followed as far south as Oxford by the
main body of troops, and some seventeen miles farther by
McPherson's command. Here the pursuit was halted to repair the
railroad from the Tallahatchie northward, in order to bring up
supplies. The piles on which the railroad bridge rested had been
left standing. The work of constructing a roadway for the troops
was but a short matter, and, later, rails were laid for cars.</p>
<p>During the delay at Oxford in repairing railroads I learned that
an expedition down the Mississippi now was inevitable and, desiring
to have a competent commander in charge, I ordered Sherman on the
8th of December back to Memphis to take charge. The following were
his orders:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Headquarters 13th Army Corps,<br/>
Department of the Tennessee.<br/>
OXFORD, MISSISSIPPI, December 8,1862.</p>
<p>MAJOR-GENERAL W. T. SHERMAN,<br/>
Commanding Right Wing:</p>
<p>You will proceed, with as little delay as possible, to Memphis,
Tennessee, taking with you one division of your present command. On
your arrival at Memphis you will assume command of all the troops
there, and that portion of General Curtis's forces at present east
of the Mississippi River, and organize them into brigades and
divisions in your own army. As soon as possible move with them down
the river to the vicinity of Vicksburg, and with the co-operation
of the gunboat fleet under command of Flag-officer Porter proceed
to the reduction of that place in such a manner as circumstances,
and your own judgment, may dictate.</p>
<p>The amount of rations, forage, land transportation, etc.,
necessary to take, will be left entirely with yourself. The
Quartermaster at St. Louis will be instructed to send you
transportation for 30,000 men; should you still find yourself
deficient, your quartermaster will be authorized to make up the
deficiency from such transports as may come into the port of
Memphis.</p>
<p>On arriving in Memphis, put yourself in communication with
Admiral Porter, and arrange with him for his co-operation.</p>
<p>Inform me at the earliest practicable day of the time when you
will embark, and such plans as may then be matured. I will hold the
forces here in readiness to co-operate with you in such manner as
the movements of the enemy may make necessary.</p>
<p>Leave the District of Memphis in the command of an efficient
officer, and with a garrison of four regiments of infantry, the
siege guns, and whatever cavalry may be there.</p>
<p>U. S. GRANT,<br/>
Major-General.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This idea had presented itself to my mind earlier, for on the 3d
of December I asked Halleck if it would not be well to hold the
enemy south of the Yallabusha and move a force from Helena and
Memphis on Vicksburg. On the 5th again I suggested, from Oxford, to
Halleck that if the Helena troops were at my command I though it
would be possible to take them and the Memphis forces south of the
mouth of the Yazoo River, and thus secure Vicksburg and the State
of Mississippi. Halleck on the same day, the 5th of December,
directed me not to attempt to hold the country south of the
Tallahatchie, but to collect 25,000 troops at Memphis by the 20th
for the Vicksburg expedition. I sent Sherman with two divisions at
once, informed the general-in-chief of the fact, and asked whether
I should command the expedition down the river myself or send
Sherman. I was authorized to do as I though best for the
accomplishment of the great object in view. I sent Sherman and so
informed General Halleck.</p>
<p>As stated, my action in sending Sherman back was expedited by a
desire to get him in command of the forces separated from my direct
supervision. I feared that delay might bring McClernand, who was
his senior and who had authority from the President and Secretary
of War to exercise that particular command,—and
independently. I doubted McClernand's fitness; and I had good
reason to believe that in forestalling him I was by no means giving
offence to those whose authority to command was above both him and
me.</p>
<p>Neither my orders to General Sherman, nor the correspondence
between us or between General Halleck and myself, contemplated at
the time my going further south than the Yallabusha. Pemberton's
force in my front was the main part of the garrison of Vicksburg,
as the force with me was the defence of the territory held by us in
West Tennessee and Kentucky. I hoped to hold Pemberton in my front
while Sherman should get in his rear and into Vicksburg. The
further north the enemy could be held the better.</p>
<p>It was understood, however, between General Sherman and myself
that our movements were to be co-operative; if Pemberton could not
be held away from Vicksburg I was to follow him; but at that time
it was not expected to abandon the railroad north of the
Yallabusha. With that point as a secondary base of supplies, the
possibility of moving down the Yazoo until communications could be
opened with the Mississippi was contemplated.</p>
<p>It was my intention, and so understood by Sherman and his
command, that if the enemy should fall back I would follow him even
to the gates of Vicksburg. I intended in such an event to hold the
road to Grenada on the Yallabusha and cut loose from there,
expecting to establish a new base of supplies on the Yazoo, or at
Vicksburg itself, with Grenada to fall back upon in case of
failure. It should be remembered that at the time I speak of it had
not been demonstrated that an army could operate in an enemy's
territory depending upon the country for supplies. A halt was
called at Oxford with the advance seventeen miles south of there,
to bring up the road to the latter point and to bring supplies of
food, forage and munitions to the front.</p>
<p>On the 18th of December I received orders from Washington to
divide my command into four army corps, with General McClernand to
command one of them and to be assigned to that part of the army
which was to operate down the Mississippi. This interfered with my
plans, but probably resulted in my ultimately taking the command in
person. McClernand was at that time in Springfield, Illinois. The
order was obeyed without any delay. Dispatches were sent to him the
same day in conformity.</p>
<p>On the 20th General Van Dorn appeared at Holly Springs, my
secondary base of supplies, captured the garrison of 1,500 men
commanded by Colonel Murphy, of the 8th Wisconsin regiment, and
destroyed all our munitions of war, food and forage. The capture
was a disgraceful one to the officer commanding but not to the
troops under him. At the same time Forrest got on our line of
railroad between Jackson, Tennessee, and Columbus, Kentucky, doing
much damage to it. This cut me off from all communication with the
north for more than a week, and it was more than two weeks before
rations or forage could be issued from stores obtained in the
regular way. This demonstrated the impossibility of maintaining so
long a line of road over which to draw supplies for an army moving
in an enemy's country. I determined, therefore, to abandon my
campaign into the interior with Columbus as a base, and returned to
La Grange and Grand Junction destroying the road to my front and
repairing the road to Memphis, making the Mississippi river the
line over which to draw supplies. Pemberton was falling back at the
same time.</p>
<p>The moment I received the news of Van Dorn's success I sent the
cavalry at the front back to drive him from the country. He had
start enough to move north destroying the railroad in many places,
and to attack several small garrisons intrenched as guards to the
railroad. All these he found warned of his coming and prepared to
receive him. Van Dorn did not succeed in capturing a single
garrison except the one at Holly Springs, which was larger than all
the others attacked by him put together. Murphy was also warned of
Van Dorn's approach, but made no preparations to meet him. He did
not even notify his command.</p>
<p>Colonel Murphy was the officer who, two months before, had
evacuated Iuka on the approach of the enemy. General Rosecrans
denounced him for the act and desired to have him tried and
punished. I sustained the colonel at the time because his command
was a small one compared with that of the enemy—not one-tenth
as large—and I thought he had done well to get away without
falling into their hands. His leaving large stores to fall into
Price's possession I looked upon as an oversight and excused it on
the ground of inexperience in military matters. He should, however,
have destroyed them. This last surrender demonstrated to my mind
that Rosecrans' judgment of Murphy's conduct at Iuka was correct.
The surrender of Holly Springs was most reprehensible and showed
either the disloyalty of Colonel Murphy to the cause which he
professed to serve, or gross cowardice.</p>
<p>After the war was over I read from the diary of a lady who
accompanied General Pemberton in his retreat from the Tallahatchie,
that the retreat was almost a panic. The roads were bad and it was
difficult to move the artillery and trains. Why there should have
been a panic I do not see. No expedition had yet started down the
Mississippi River. Had I known the demoralized condition of the
enemy, or the fact that central Mississippi abounded so in all army
supplies, I would have been in pursuit of Pemberton while his
cavalry was destroying the roads in my rear.</p>
<p>After sending cavalry to drive Van Dorn away, my next order was
to dispatch all the wagons we had, under proper escort, to collect
and bring in all supplies of forage and food from a region of
fifteen miles east and west of the road from our front back to
Grand Junction, leaving two months' supplies for the families of
those whose stores were taken. I was amazed at the quantity of
supplies the country afforded. It showed that we could have
subsisted off the country for two months instead of two weeks
without going beyond the limits designated. This taught me a lesson
which was taken advantage of later in the campaign when our army
lived twenty days with the issue of only five days' rations by the
commissary. Our loss of supplies was great at Holly Springs, but it
was more than compensated for by those taken from the country and
by the lesson taught.</p>
<p>The news of the capture of Holly Springs and the destruction of
our supplies caused much rejoicing among the people remaining in
Oxford. They came with broad smiles on their faces, indicating
intense joy, to ask what I was going to do now without anything for
my soldiers to eat. I told them that I was not disturbed; that I
had already sent troops and wagons to collect all the food and
forage they could find for fifteen miles on each side of the road.
Countenances soon changed, and so did the inquiry. The next was,
"What are WE to do?" My response was that we had endeavored to feed
ourselves from our own northern resources while visiting them; but
their friends in gray had been uncivil enough to destroy what we
had brought along, and it could not be expected that men, with arms
in their hands, would starve in the midst of plenty. I advised them
to emigrate east, or west, fifteen miles and assist in eating up
what we left.</p>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<SPAN name="ch31" id="ch31"></SPAN>
<center>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />