<p><SPAN name="link2H_4_0216" id="link2H_4_0216"></SPAN></p>
<h2> LETTER CCXIV </h2>
<h3> BATH, November 26, 1757 </h3>
<p>MY DEAR FRIEND: I received by the last mail your short account of the King
of Prussia's victory; which victory, contrary to custom, turns out more
complete than it was at first reported to be. This appears by an
intercepted letter from Monsieur de St. Germain to Monsieur d'Affry, at
The Hague, in which he tells him, 'Cette arme est entierement fondue', and
lays the blame, very strongly, upon Monsieur de Soubize. But, be it
greater or be it less, I am glad of it; because the King of Prussia (whom
I honor and almost adore) I am sure is. Though 'd'ailleurs', between you
and me, 'ou est-ce que cela mene'? To nothing, while that formidable union
of three great Powers of Europe subsists against him, could that be any
way broken, something might be done; without which nothing can. I take it
for granted that the King of Prussia will do all he can to detach France.
Why should not we, on our part, try to detach Russia? At least, in our
present distress, 'omnia tentanda', and sometimes a lucky and unexpected
hit turns up. This thought came into my head this morning; and I give it
to you, not as a very probable scheme, but as a possible one, and
consequently worth trying. The year of the Russian subsidies (nominally
paid by the Court of Vienna, but really by France) is near expired. The
former probably cannot, and perhaps the latter will not, renew them. The
Court of Petersburg is beggarly, profuse, greedy, and by no means
scrupulous. Why should not we step in there, and out-bid them? If we
could, we buy a great army at once; which would give an entire new turn to
the affairs of that part of the world at least. And if we bid handsomely,
I do not believe the 'bonne foi' of that Court would stand in the way.
Both our Court and our parliament would, I am very sure, give a very great
sum, and very cheerfully, for this purpose. In the next place, Why should
not you wriggle yourself, if possible, into so great a scheme? You are, no
doubt, much acquainted with the Russian Resident, Soltikow; Why should you
not sound him, as entirely from yourself, upon this subject? You may ask
him, What, does your Court intend to go on next year in the pay of France,
to destroy the liberties of all Europe, and throw universal monarchy into
the hands of that already great and always ambitious Power? I know you
think, or at least call yourselves, the allies of the Empress Queen; but
is it not plain that she will be, in the first place, and you in the next,
the dupes of France? At this very time you are doing the work of France
and Sweden: and that for some miserable subsidies, much inferior to those
which I am sure you might have, in a better cause, and more consistent
with the true interest of Russia. Though not empowered, I know the manner
of thinking of my own Court so well upon this subject, that I will venture
to promise you much better terms than those you have now, without the
least apprehensions of being disavowed. Should he listen to this, and what
more may occur to you to say upon this subject, and ask you, 'En ecrirai
je d ma cour? Answer him, 'Ecrivez, ecrivex, Monsieur hardiment'. Je
prendrai tout cela sur moi'. Should this happen, as perhaps, and as I
heartily wish it may, then write an exact relation of it to your own
Court. Tell them that you thought the measure of such great importance,
that you could not help taking this little step toward bringing it about;
but that you mentioned it only as from yourself, and that you have not in
the least committed them by it. If Soltikow lends himself in any degree to
this, insinuate that, in the present situation of affairs, and
particularly of the King's Electoral dominions, you are very sure that his
Majesty would have 'une reconnoissance sans bornes' for ALL those by whose
means so desirable a revival of an old and long friendship should be
brought about. You will perhaps tell me that, without doubt, Mr. Keith's
instructions are to the same effect: but I will answer you, that you can,
IF YOU PLEASE, do it better than Mr. Keith; and in the next place that, be
all that as it will, it must be very advantageous to you at home, to show
that you have at least a contriving head, and an alertness in business.</p>
<p>I had a letter by the last post, from the Duke of Newcastle, in which he
congratulates me, in his own name and in Lord Hardwicke's, upon the
approbation which your dispatches give, not only to them two, but to
OTHERS. This success, so early, should encourage your diligence and rouse
your ambition if you have any; you may go a great way, if you desire it,
having so much time before you.</p>
<p>I send you here inclosed the copy of the Report of the three general
officers, appointed to examine previously into the conduct of General M——t;
it is ill written, and ill spelled, but no matter; you will decipher it.
You will observe, by the tenor of it, that it points strongly to a
court-martial; which, no doubt, will soon be held upon him. I presume
there will be no shooting in the final sentence; but I do suppose there
will be breaking, etc.</p>
<p>I have had some severe returns of my old complaints last week, and am
still unwell; I cannot help it.</p>
<p>A friend of yours arrived here three days ago; she seems to me to be a
serviceable strong-bodied bay mare, with black mane and tail; you easily
guess who I mean. She is come with mamma, and without 'caro sposo'.</p>
<p>Adieu! my head will not let me go on longer.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />