<p><SPAN name="link2H_4_0197" id="link2H_4_0197"></SPAN></p>
<h2> LETTER CXCV </h2>
<h3> LONDON, February 12, 1754. </h3>
<p>MY DEAR FRIEND: I take my aim, and let off this letter at you at Berlin; I
should be sorry it missed you, because I believe you will read it with as
much pleasure as I write it. It is to inform you, that, after some
difficulties and dangers, your seat in the new parliament is at last
absolutely secured, and that without opposition, or the least necessity of
your personal trouble or appearance. This success, I must further inform
you, is in a great degree owing to Mr. Eliot's friendship to us both; for
he brings you in with himself at his surest borough. As it was impossible
to act with more zeal and friendship than Mr. Eliot has acted in this
whole affair, I desire that you will, by the very next post, write him a
letter of thanks, warm and young thanks, not old and cold ones. You may
inclose it in yours to me, and, I will send it to him, for he is now in
Cornwall.</p>
<p>Thus, sure of being a senator, I dare say you do not propose to be one of
the 'pedarii senatores, et pedibus ire in sententiam; for, as the House of
Commons is the theatre where you must make your fortune and figure in the
world, you must resolve to be an actor, and not a 'persona muta', which is
just equivalent to a candle snuffer upon other theatres. Whoever does not
shine there, is obscure, insignificant and contemptible; and you cannot
conceive how easy it is for a man of half your sense and knowledge to
shine there if he pleases. The receipt to make a speaker, and an applauded
one too, is short and easy.—Take of common sense 'quantum sufcit',
add a little application to the rules and orders of the House, throw
obvious thoughts in a new light, and make up the whole with a large
quantity of purity, correctness, and elegance of style. Take it for
granted, that by far the greatest part of mankind do neither analyze nor
search to the bottom; they are incapable of penetrating deeper than the
surface. All have senses to be gratified, very few have reason to be
applied to. Graceful utterance and action please their eyes, elegant
diction tickles their ears; but strong reason would be thrown away upon
them. I am not only persuaded by theory, but convinced by my experience,
that (supposing a certain degree of common sense) what is called a good
speaker is as much a mechanic as a good shoemaker; and that the two trades
are equally to be learned by the same degree of application. Therefore,
for God's sake, let this trade be the principal object of your thoughts;
never lose sight of it. Attend minutely to your style, whatever language
you speak or write in; seek for the best words, and think of the best
turns. Whenever you doubt of the propriety or elegance of any word, search
the dictionary or some good author for it, or inquire of somebody, who is
master of that language; and, in a little time, propriety and elegance of
diction will become so habitual to you, that they will cost you no more
trouble. As I have laid this down to be mechanical and attainable by
whoever will take the necessary pains, there will be no great vanity in my
saying, that I saw the importance of the object so early, and attended to
it so young, that it would now cost me more trouble to speak or write
ungrammatically, vulgarly, and inelegantly, than ever it did to avoid
doing so. The late Lord Bolingbroke, without the least trouble, talked all
day long, full as elegantly as he wrote. Why? Not by a peculiar gift from
heaven; but, as he has often told me himself, by an early and constant
attention to his style. The present Solicitor-General, Murray,—[Created
Lord Mansfield in the year 1756.]—has less law than many lawyers,
but has more practice than any; merely upon account of his eloquence, of
which he has a never-failing stream. I remember so long ago as when I was
at Cambridge, whenever I read pieces of eloquence (and indeed they were my
chief study) whether ancient or modern, I used to write down the shining
passages, and then translate them, as well and as elegantly as ever I
could; if Latin or French, into English; if English, into French. This,
which I practiced for some years, not only improved and formed my style,
but imprinted in my mind and memory the best thoughts of the best authors.
The trouble was little, but the advantage I have experienced was great.
While you are abroad, you can neither have time nor opportunity to read
pieces of English or parliamentary eloquence, as I hope you will carefully
do when you return; but, in the meantime, whenever pieces of French
eloquence come in your way, such as the speeches of persons received into
the Academy, 'orasions funebres', representations of the several
parliaments to the King, etc., read them in that view, in that spirit;
observe the harmony, the turn and elegance of the style; examine in what
you think it might have been better; and consider in what, had you written
it yourself; you might have done worse. Compare the different manners of
expressing the same thoughts in different authors; and observe how
differently the same things appear in different dresses. Vulgar, coarse,
and ill-chosen words, will deform and degrade the best thoughts as much as
rags and dirt will the best figure. In short, you now know your object;
pursue it steadily, and have no digressions that are not relative to, and
connected with, the main action. Your success in parliament will
effectually remove all OTHER OBJECTIONS; either a foreign or a domestic
destination will no longer be refused you, if you make your way to it
through Westminster.</p>
<p>I think I may now say, that I am quite recovered from my late illness,
strength and spirits excepted, which are not yet restored. Aix-la-Chapelle
and Spa will, I believe, answer all my purposes.</p>
<p>I long to hear an account of your reception at Berlin, which I fancy will
be a most gracious one. Adieu.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />