<p><SPAN name="link2H_4_0158" id="link2H_4_0158"></SPAN></p>
<h2> LETTER CLVI </h2>
<p>LONDON, January 6, O. S. 1752. MY DEAR FRIEND</p>
<p>I recommended to you, in my last, some inquiries into the constitution of
that famous society the Sorbonne; but as I cannot wholly trust to the
diligence of those inquiries, I will give you here the outlines of that
establishment; which may possibly excite you to inform yourself of
particulars, which you are more 'a portee' to know than I am.</p>
<p>It was founded by Robert de Sorbon, in the year 1256 for sixteen poor
scholars in divinity; four of each nation, of the university of which it
made a part; since that it hath been much extended and enriched,
especially by the liberality and pride of Cardinal Richelieu; who made it
a magnificent building for six-and-thirty doctors of that society to live
in; besides which, there are six professors and schools for divinity. This
society has long been famous for theological knowledge and exercitations.
There unintelligible points are debated with passion, though they can
never be determined by reason. Logical subtilties set common sense at
defiance; and mystical refinements disfigure and disguise the native
beauty and simplicity of true natural religion; wild imaginations form
systems, which weak minds adopt implicitly, and which sense and reason
oppose in vain; their voice is not strong enough to be heard in schools of
divinity. Political views are by no means neglected in those sacred
places; and questions are agitated and decided, according to the degree of
regard, or rather submission, which the Sovereign is pleased to show the
Church. Is the King a slave to the Church, though a tyrant to the laity?
The least resistance to his will shall be declared damnable. But if he
will not acknowledge the superiority of their spiritual over his temporal,
nor even admit their 'imperium in imperio', which is the least they will
compound for, it becomes meritorious not only to resist, but to depose
him. And I suppose that the bold propositions in the thesis you mention,
are a return for the valuation of 'les biens du Clerge'.</p>
<p>I would advise you, by all means, to attend to two or three of their
public disputations, in order to be informed both of the manner and the
substance of those scholastic exercises. Pray remember to go to all those
kind of things. Do not put it off, as one is too apt to do those things
which one knows can be done every day, or any day; for one afterward
repents extremely, when too late, the not having done them.</p>
<p>But there is another (so-called) religious society, of which the minutest
circumstance deserves attention, and furnishes great matter for useful
reflections. You easily guess that I mean the society of 'les R. R. P. P.
Jesuites', established but in the year 1540, by a Bull of Pope Paul III.
Its progress, and I may say its victories, were more rapid than those of
the Romans; for within the same century it governed all Europe; and, in
the next, it extended its influence over the whole world. Its founder was
an abandoned profligate Spanish officer, Ignatius Loyola; who, in the year
1521, being wounded in the leg at the 'siege of Pampeluna, went mad from
the smart of his wound, the reproaches of his conscience, and his
confinement, during which he read the lives of the Saints. Consciousness
of guilt, a fiery temper, and a wild imagination, the common ingredients
of enthusiasm, made this madman devote himself to the particular service
of the Virgin Mary; whose knight-errant he declared himself, in the very
same form in which the old knight-errants in romances used to declare
themselves the knights and champions of certain beautiful and incomparable
princesses, whom sometimes they had, but oftener had not, seen. For
Dulcinea del Toboso was by no means the first princess whom her faithful
and valorous knight had never seen in his life. The enthusiast went to the
Holy Land, from whence he returned to Spain, where he began to learn Latin
and philosophy at three-and-thirty years old, so that no doubt but he made
great progress in both. The better to carry on his mad and wicked designs,
he chose four disciples, or rather apostles, all Spaniards, viz, Laynes,
Salmeron, Bobadilla, and Rodriguez. He then composed the rules and
constitutions of his order; which, in the year 1547, was called the order
of Jesuits, from the church of Jesus in Rome, which was given them.
Ignatius died in 1556, aged sixty-five, thirty-five years after his
conversion, and sixteen years after the establishment of his society. He
was canonized in the year 1609, and is doubtless now a saint in heaven.</p>
<p>If the religious and moral principles of this society are to be detested,
as they justly are, the wisdom of their political principles is as justly
to be admired. Suspected, collectively as an order, of the greatest
crimes, and convicted of many, they have either escaped punishment, or
triumphed after it; as in France, in the reign of Henry IV. They have,
directly or indirectly, governed the consciences and the councils of all
the Catholic princes in Europe; they almost governed China in the reign of
Cangghi; and they are now actually in possession of the Paraguay in
America, pretending, but paying no obedience to the Crown of Spain. As a
collective body they are detested, even by all the Catholics, not
excepting the clergy, both secular and regular, and yet, as individuals,
they are loved, respected, and they govern wherever they are.</p>
<p>Two things, I believe, contribute to their success. The first, that
passive, implicit, unlimited obedience to their General (who always
resides at Rome), and to the superiors of their several houses, appointed
by him. This obedience is observed by them all to a most astonishing
degree; and, I believe, there is no one society in the world, of which so
many individuals sacrifice their private interest to the general one of
the society itself. The second is the education of youth, which they have
in a manner engrossed; there they give the first, and the first are the
lasting impressions; those impressions are always calculated to be
favorable to the society. I have known many Catholics, educated by the
Jesuits, who, though they detested the society, from reason and knowledge,
have always remained attached to it, from habit and prejudice. The Jesuits
know, better than any set of people in the world, the importance of the
art of pleasing, and study it more; they become all things to all men in
order to gain, not a few, but many. In Asia, Africa, and America they
become more than half pagans, in order to convert the pagans to be less
than half Christians. In private families they begin by insinuating
themselves as friends, they grow to be favorites, and they end DIRECTORS.
Their manners are not like those of any other regulars in the world, but
gentle, polite, and engaging. They are all carefully bred up to that
particular destination, to which they seem to have a natural turn; for
which reason one sees most Jesuits excel in some particular thing. They
even breed up some for martyrdom in case of need; as the superior of a
Jesuit seminary at Rome told Lord Bolingbroke. 'E abbiamo anche martiri
per il martirio, se bisogna'.</p>
<p>Inform yourself minutely of everything concerning this extraordinary
establishment; go into their houses, get acquainted with individuals, hear
some of them preach. The finest preacher I ever heard in my life is le
Pere Neufville, who, I believe, preaches still at Paris, and is so much in
the best company, that you may easily get personally acquainted with him.</p>
<p>If you would know their 'morale' read Pascal's 'Lettres Provinciales', in
which it is very truly displayed from their own writings.</p>
<p>Upon the whole, this is certain, that a society of which so little good is
said, and so much ill believed, and that still not only subsists, but
flourishes, must be a very able one. It is always mentioned as a proof of
the superior abilities of the Cardinal Richelieu, that, though hated by
all the nation, and still more by his master, he kept his power in spite
of both.</p>
<p>I would earnestly wish you to do everything now, which I wish, that I had
done at your age, and did not do. Every country has its peculiarities,
which one can be much better informed of during one's residence there,
than by reading all the books in the world afterward. While you are in
Catholic countries, inform yourself of all the forms and ceremonies of
that tawdry church; see their converts both of men and women, know their
several rules and orders, attend their most remarkable ceremonies; have
their terms of art explained to you, their 'tierce, sexte, nones, matines;
vepres, complies'; their 'breviares, rosaires, heures, chapelets, agnus',
etc., things that many people talk of from habit, though few people know
the true meaning of anyone of them. Converse with, and study the
characters of some of those incarcerated enthusiasts. Frequent some
'parloirs', and see the air and manners of those Recluse, who are a
distinct nation themselves, and like no other.</p>
<p>I dined yesterday with Mrs. F——d, her mother and husband. He
is an athletic Hibernian, handsome in his person, but excessively awkward
and vulgar in his air and manner. She inquired much after you, and, I
thought, with interest. I answered her as a 'Mezzano' should do: 'Et je
pronai votre tendresse, vos soins, et vos soupirs'.</p>
<p>When you meet with any British returning to their own country, pray send
me by them any little 'brochures, factums, theses', etc., 'qui font du
bruit ou du plaisir a Paris'. Adieu, child.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />