<p><SPAN name="link2H_4_0028" id="link2H_4_0028"></SPAN></p>
<h2> PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY AND MARY GODWIN </h2>
<p>A great deal has been said and written in favor of early marriage; and, in
a general way, early marriage may be an admirable thing. Young men and
young women who have no special gift of imagination, and who have
practically reached their full mental development at twenty-one or
twenty-two—or earlier, even in their teens—may marry safely;
because they are already what they will be. They are not going to
experience any growth upward and outward. Passing years simply bring them
more closely together, until they have settled down into a sort of
domestic unity, by which they think alike, act alike, and even gradually
come to look alike.</p>
<p>But early wedlock spells tragedy to the man or the woman of genius. In
their teens they have only begun to grow. What they will be ten years
hence, no one can prophesy. Therefore, to mate so early in life is to
insure almost certain storm and stress, and, in the end, domestic
wreckage.</p>
<p>As a rule, it is the man, and not the woman, who makes the false step;
because it is the man who elects to marry when he is still very young. If
he choose some ill-fitting, commonplace, and unresponsive nature to match
his own, it is he who is bound in the course of time to learn his great
mistake. When the splendid eagle shall have got his growth, and shall
begin to soar up into the vault of heaven, the poor little barn-yard fowl
that he once believed to be his equal seems very far away in everything.
He discovers that she is quite unable to follow him in his towering
flights.</p>
<p>The story of Percy Bysshe Shelley is a singular one. The circumstances of
his early marriage were strange. The breaking of his marriage-bond was
also strange. Shelley himself was an extraordinary creature. He was blamed
a great deal in his lifetime for what he did, and since then some have
echoed the reproach. Yet it would seem as if, at the very beginning of his
life, he was put into a false position against his will. Because of this
he was misunderstood until the end of his brief and brilliant and erratic
career.</p>
<p>SHELLEY AND MARY GODWIN</p>
<p>In 1792 the French Revolution burst into flame, the mob of Paris stormed
the Tuileries, the King of France was cast into a dungeon to await his
execution, and the wild sons of anarchy flung their gauntlet of defiance
into the face of Europe. In this tremendous year was born young Shelley;
and perhaps his nature represented the spirit of the time.</p>
<p>Certainly, neither from his father nor from his mother did he derive that
perpetual unrest and that frantic fondness for revolt which blazed out in
the poet when he was still a boy. His father, Mr. Timothy Shelley, was a
very usual, thick-headed, unromantic English squire. His mother—a
woman of much beauty, but of no exceptional traits—was the daughter
of another squire, and at the time of her marriage was simply one of ten
thousand fresh-faced, pleasant-spoken English country girls. If we look
for a strain of the romantic in Shelley's ancestry, we shall have to find
it in the person of his grandfather, who was a very remarkable and
powerful character.</p>
<p>This person, Bysshe Shelley by name, had in his youth been associated with
some mystery. He was not born in England, but in America—and in
those days the name "America" meant almost anything indefinite and
peculiar. However this might be, Bysshe Shelley, though a scion of a good
old English family, had wandered in strange lands, and it was whispered
that he had seen strange sights and done strange things. According to one
legend, he had been married in America, though no one knew whether his
wife was white or black, or how he had got rid of her.</p>
<p>He might have remained in America all his life, had not a small
inheritance fallen to his share. This brought him back to England, and he
soon found that England was in reality the place to make his fortune. He
was a man of magnificent physique. His rovings had given him ease and
grace, and the power which comes from a wide experience of life. He could
be extremely pleasing when he chose; and he soon won his way into the good
graces of a rich heiress, whom he married.</p>
<p>With her wealth he became an important personage, and consorted with
gentlemen and statesmen of influence, attaching himself particularly to
the Duke of Northumberland, by whose influence he was made a baronet. When
his rich wife died, Shelley married a still richer bride; and so this man,
who started out as a mere adventurer without a shilling to his name, died
in 1813, leaving more than a million dollars in cash, with lands whose
rent-roll yielded a hundred thousand dollars every year.</p>
<p>If any touch of the romantic which we find in Shelley is a matter of
heredity, we must trace it to this able, daring, restless, and magnificent
old grandfather, who was the beau ideal of an English squire—the
sort of squire who had added foreign graces to native sturdiness. But
young Shelley, the future poet, seemed scarcely to be English at all. As a
young boy he cared nothing for athletic sports. He was given to much
reading. He thought a good deal about abstractions with which most
schoolboys never concern themselves at all.</p>
<p>Consequently, both in private schools and afterward at Eton, he became a
sort of rebel against authority. He resisted the fagging-system. He spoke
contemptuously of physical prowess. He disliked anything that he was
obliged to do, and he rushed eagerly into whatever was forbidden.</p>
<p>Finally, when he was sent to University College, Oxford, he broke all
bounds. At a time when Tory England was aghast over the French Revolution
and its results, Shelley talked of liberty and equality on all occasions.
He made friends with an uncouth but able fellow student, who bore the
remarkable name of Thomas Jefferson Hogg—a name that seems rampant
with republicanism—and very soon he got himself expelled from the
university for publishing a little tract of an infidel character called "A
Defense of Atheism."</p>
<p>His expulsion for such a cause naturally shocked his father. It probably
disturbed Shelley himself; but, after all, it gave him some satisfaction
to be a martyr for the cause of free speech. He went to London with his
friend Hogg, and took lodgings there. He read omnivorously—Hogg says
as much as sixteen hours a day. He would walk through the most crowded
streets poring over a volume, while holding another under one arm.</p>
<p>His mind was full of fancies. He had begun what was afterward called "his
passion for reforming everything." He despised most of the laws of
England. He thought its Parliament ridiculous. He hated its religion. He
was particularly opposed to marriage. This last fact gives some point to
the circumstances which almost immediately confronted him.</p>
<p>Shelley was now about nineteen years old—an age at which most
English boys are emerging from the public schools, and are still in the
hobbledehoy stage of their formation. In a way, he was quite far from
boyish; yet in his knowledge of life he was little more than a mere child.
He knew nothing thoroughly—much less the ways of men and women. He
had no visible means of existence except a small allowance from his
father. His four sisters, who were at a boarding-school on Clapham Common,
used to save their pin-money and send it to their gifted brother so that
he might not actually starve. These sisters he used to call upon from time
to time, and through them he made the acquaintance of a sixteen-year-old
girl named Harriet Westbrook.</p>
<p>Harriet Westbrook was the daughter of a black-visaged keeper of a
coffee-house in Mount Street, called "Jew Westbrook," partly because of
his complexion, and partly because of his ability to retain what he had
made. He was, indeed, fairly well off, and had sent his younger daughter,
Harriet, to the school where Shelley's sisters studied.</p>
<p>Harriet Westbrook seems to have been a most precocious person. Any girl of
sixteen is, of course, a great deal older and more mature than a youth of
nineteen. In the present instance Harriet might have been Shelley's senior
by five years. There is no doubt that she fell in love with him; but,
having done so, she by no means acted in the shy and timid way that would
have been most natural to a very young girl in her first love-affair.
Having decided that she wanted him, she made up her mind to get Mm at any
cost, and her audacity was equaled only by his simplicity. She was rather
attractive in appearance, with abundant hair, a plump figure, and a
pink-and-white complexion. This description makes of her a rather
doll-like girl; but doll-like girls are just the sort to attract an
inexperienced young man who has yet to learn that beauty and charm are
quite distinct from prettiness, and infinitely superior to it.</p>
<p>In addition to her prettiness, Harriet Westbrook had a vivacious manner
and talked quite pleasingly. She was likewise not a bad listener; and she
would listen by the hour to Shelley in his rhapsodies about chemistry,
poetry, the failure of Christianity, the national debt, and human liberty,
all of which he jumbled up without much knowledge, but in a lyric strain
of impassioned eagerness which would probably have made the
multiplication-table thrilling.</p>
<p>For Shelley himself was a creature of extraordinary fascination, both then
and afterward. There are no likenesses of him that do him justice, because
they cannot convey that singular appeal which the man himself made to
almost every one who met him.</p>
<p>The eminent painter, Mulready, once said that Shelley was too beautiful
for portraiture; and yet the descriptions of him hardly seem to bear this
out. He was quite tall and slender, but he stooped so much as to make him
appear undersized. His head was very small-quite disproportionately so;
but this was counteracted to the eye by his long and tumbled hair which,
when excited, he would rub and twist in a thousand different directions
until it was actually bushy. His eyes and mouth were his best features.
The former were of a deep violet blue, and when Shelley felt deeply moved
they seemed luminous with a wonderful and almost unearthly light. His
mouth was finely chiseled, and might be regarded as representing
perfection.</p>
<p>One great defect he had, and this might well have overbalanced his
attractive face. The defect in question was his voice. One would have
expected to hear from him melodious sounds, and vocal tones both rich and
penetrating; but, as a matter of fact, his voice was shrill at the very
best, and became actually discordant and peacock-like in moments of
emotion.</p>
<p>Such, then, was Shelley, star-eyed, with the delicate complexion of a
girl, wonderfully mobile in his features, yet speaking in a voice high
pitched and almost raucous. For the rest, he arrayed himself with care and
in expensive clothing, even though he took no thought of neatness, so that
his garments were almost always rumpled and wrinkled from his frequent
writhings on couches and on the floor. Shelley had a strange and almost
primitive habit of rolling on the earth, and another of thrusting his
tousled head close up to the hottest fire in the house, or of lying in the
glaring sun when out of doors. It is related that he composed one of his
finest poems—"The Cenci"—in Italy, while stretched out with
face upturned to an almost tropical sun.</p>
<p>But such as he was, and though he was not yet famous, Harriet Westbrook,
the rosy-faced schoolgirl, fell in love with him, and rather plainly let
him know that she had done so. There are a thousand ways in which a woman
can convey this information without doing anything un-maidenly; and of all
these little arts Miss Westbrook was instinctively a mistress.</p>
<p>She played upon Shelley's feelings by telling him that her father was
cruel to her, and that he contemplated actions still more cruel. There is
something absurdly comical about the grievance which she brought to
Shelley; but it is much more comical to note the tremendous seriousness
with which he took it. He wrote to his friend Hogg:</p>
<p>Her father has persecuted her in a most horrible way, by endeavoring to
compel her to go to school. She asked my advice; resistance was the
answer. At the same time I essayed to mollify Mr. Westbrook, in vain! I
advised her to resist. She wrote to say that resistance was useless, but
that she would fly with me and throw herself on my protection.</p>
<p>Some letters that have recently come to light show that there was a
dramatic scene between Harriet Westbrook and Shelley—a scene in the
course of which she threw her arms about his neck and wept upon his
shoulder. Here was a curious situation. Shelley was not at all in love
with her. He had explicitly declared this only a short time before. Yet
here was a pretty girl about to suffer the "horrible persecution" of being
sent to school, and finding no alternative save to "throw herself on his
protection"—in other words, to let him treat her as he would, and to
become his mistress.</p>
<p>The absurdity of the situation makes one smile. Common sense should have
led some one to box Harriet's ears and send her off to school without a
moment's hesitation; while as for Shelley, he should have been told how
ludicrous was the whole affair. But he was only nineteen, and she was only
sixteen, and the crisis seemed portentous. Nothing could be more
flattering to a young man's vanity than to have this girl cast herself
upon him for protection. It did not really matter that he had not loved
her hitherto, and that he was already half engaged to another Harriet—his
cousin, Miss Grove. He could not stop and reason with himself. He must
like a true knight rescue lovely girlhood from the horrors of a school!</p>
<p>It is not unlikely that this whole affair was partly managed or
manipulated by the girl's father. Jew Westbrook knew that Shelley was
related to rich and titled people, and that he was certain, if he lived,
to become Sir Percy, and to be the heir of his grandfather's estates.
Hence it may be that Harriet's queer conduct was not wholly of her own
prompting.</p>
<p>In any case, however, it proved to be successful. Shelley's ardent and
impulsive nature could not bear to see a girl in tears and appealing for
his help. Hence, though in his heart she was very little to him, his
romantic nature gave up for her sake the affection that he had felt for
his cousin, his own disbelief in marriage, and finally the common sense
which ought to have told him not to marry any one on two hundred pounds a
year.</p>
<p>So the pair set off for Edinburgh by stagecoach. It was a weary and most
uncomfortable journey. When they reached the Scottish capital, they were
married by the Scottish law. Their money was all gone; but their landlord,
with a jovial sympathy for romance, let them have a room, and treated them
to a rather promiscuous wedding-banquet, in which every one in the house
participated.</p>
<p>Such is the story of Shelley's marriage, contracted at nineteen with a
girl of sixteen who most certainly lured him on against his own better
judgment and in the absence of any actual love.</p>
<p>The girl whom he had taken to himself was a well-meaning little thing. She
tried for a time to meet her husband's moods and to be a real companion to
him. But what could one expect from such a union? Shelley's father
withdrew the income which he had previously given. Jew Westbrook refused
to contribute anything, hoping, probably, that this course would bring the
Shelleys to the rescue. But as it was, the young pair drifted about from
place to place, getting very precarious supplies, running deeper into debt
each day, and finding less and less to admire in each other.</p>
<p>Shelley took to laudanum. Harriet dropped her abstruse studies, which she
had taken up to please her husband, but which could only puzzle her small
brain. She soon developed some of the unpleasant traits of the class to
which she belonged. In this her sister Eliza—a hard and grasping
middle-aged woman—had her share. She set Harriet against her
husband, and made life less endurable for both. She was so much older than
the pair that she came in and ruled their household like a typical
stepmother.</p>
<p>A child was born, and Shelley very generously went through a second form
of marriage, so as to comply with the English law; but by this time there
was little hope of righting things again. Shelley was much offended
because Harriet would not nurse the child. He believed her hard because
she saw without emotion an operation performed upon the infant.</p>
<p>Finally, when Shelley at last came into a considerable sum of money,
Harriet and Eliza made no pretense of caring for anything except the
spending of it in "bonnet-shops" and on carriages and display. In time—that
is to say, in three years after their marriage—Harriet left her
husband and went to London and to Bath, prompted by her elder sister.</p>
<p>This proved to be the end of an unfortunate marriage. Word was brought to
Shelley that his wife was no longer faithful to him. He, on his side, had
carried on a semi-sentimental platonic correspondence with a
schoolmistress, one Miss Hitchener. But until now his life had been one
great mistake—a life of restlessness, of unsatisfied longing, of a
desire that had no name. Then came the perhaps inevitable meeting with the
one whom he should have met before.</p>
<p>Shelley had taken a great interest in William Godwin, the writer and
radical philosopher. Godwin's household was a strange one. There was Fanny
Imlay, a child born out of wedlock, the offspring of Gilbert Imlay, an
American merchant, and of Mary Wollstonecraft, whom Godwin had
subsequently married. There was also a singularly striking girl who then
styled herself Mary Jane Clairmont, and who was afterward known as Claire
Clairmont, she and her brother being the early children of Godwin's second
wife.</p>
<p>One day in 1814, Shelley called on Godwin, and found there a beautiful
young girl in her seventeenth year, "with shapely golden head, a face very
pale and pure, a great forehead, earnest hazel eyes, and an expression at
once of sensibility and firmness about her delicately curved lips." This
was Mary Godwin—one who had inherited her mother's power of mind and
likewise her grace and sweetness.</p>
<p>From the very moment of their meeting Shelley and this girl were fated to
be joined together, and both of them were well aware of it. Each felt the
other's presence exert a magnetic thrill. Each listened eagerly to what
the other said. Each thought of nothing, and each cared for nothing, in
the other's absence. It was a great compelling elemental force which drove
the two together and bound them fast. Beside this marvelous experience,
how pale and pitiful and paltry seemed the affectations of Harriet
Westbrook!</p>
<p>In little more than a month from the time of their first meeting, Shelley
and Mary Godwin and Miss Clairmont left Godwin's house at four o 'clock in
the morning, and hurried across the Channel to Calais. They wandered
almost like vagabonds across France, eating black bread and the coarsest
fare, walking on the highways when they could not afford to ride, and
putting up with every possible inconvenience. Yet it is worth noting that
neither then nor at any other time did either Shelley or Mary regret what
they had done. To the very end of the poet's brief career they were
inseparable.</p>
<p>Later he was able to pension Harriet, who, being of a morbid disposition,
ended her life by drowning—not, it may be said, because of grief for
Shelley. It has been told that Fanny Imlay, Mary's sister, likewise
committed suicide because Shelley did not care for her, but this has also
been disproved. There was really nothing to mar the inner happiness of the
poet and the woman who, at the very end, became his wife. Living, as they
did, in Italy and Switzerland, they saw much of their own countrymen, such
as Landor and Leigh Hunt and Byron, to whose fascinations poor Miss
Clairmont yielded, and became the mother of the little girl Allegra.</p>
<p>But there could have been no truer union than this of Shelley's with the
woman whom nature had intended for him. It was in his love-life, far more
than in his poetry, that he attained completeness. When he died by
drowning, in 1822, and his body was burned in the presence of Lord Byron,
he was truly mourned by the one whom he had only lately made his wife. As
a poet he never reached the same perfection; for his genius was fitful and
uncertain, rare in its flights, and mingled always with that which
disappoints.</p>
<p>As the lover and husband of Mary Godwin, there was nothing left to wish.
In his verse, however, the truest word concerning him will always be that
exquisite sentence of Matthew Arnold:</p>
<p>"A beautiful and ineffectual angel beating his luminous wings against the
void in vain."</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />