<p><SPAN name="link2HCH0025" id="link2HCH0025"></SPAN></p>
<h2> CHAPTER 25. </h2>
<p>Archelaus Procures A Reconciliation Between Alexander<br/>
Pheroras, And Herod.<br/></p>
<p>1. Now as to Alexander, since he perceived it impossible to persuade his
father [that he was innocent], he resolved to meet his calamities, how
severe soever they were; so he composed four books against his enemies,
and confessed that he had been in a plot; but declared withal that the
greatest part [of the courtiers] were in a plot with him, and chiefly
Pheroras and Salome; nay, that Salome once came and forced him to lie with
her in the night time, whether he would or no. These books were put into
Herod's hands, and made a great clamor against the men in power. And now
it was that Archelaus came hastily into Judea, as being affrighted for his
son-in-law and his daughter; and he came as a proper assistant, and in a
very prudent manner, and by a stratagem he obliged the king not to execute
what he had threatened; for when he was come to him, he cried out, "Where
in the world is this wretched son-in-law of mine? Where shall I see the
head of him which contrived to murder his father, which I will tear to
pieces with my own hands? I will do the same also to my daughter, who hath
such a fine husband; for although she be not a partner in the plot, yet,
by being the wife of such a creature, she is polluted. And I cannot but
admire at thy patience, against whom this plot is laid, if Alexander be
still alive; for as I came with what haste I could from Cappadocia, I
expected to find him put to death for his crimes long ago; but still, in
order to make an examination with thee about my daughter, whom, out of
regard to thee and by dignity, I had espoused to him in marriage; but now
we must take counsel about them both; and if thy paternal affection be so
great, that thou canst not punish thy son, who hath plotted against thee,
let us change our right hands, and let us succeed one to the other in
expressing our rage upon this occasion."</p>
<p>2. When he had made this pompous declaration, he got Herod to remit of his
anger, though he were in disorder, who thereupon gave him the books which
Alexander had composed to be read by him; and as he came to every head, he
considered of it, together with Herod. So Archelaus took hence the
occasion for that stratagem which he made use of, and by degrees he laid
the blame on those men whose names were in these books, and especially
upon Pheroras; and when he saw that the king believed him [to be in
earnest], he said, "We must consider whether the young man be not himself
plotted against by such a number of wicked wretches, and not thou plotted
against by the young man; for I cannot see any occasion for his falling
into so horrid a crime, since he enjoys the advantages of royalty already,
and has the expectation of being one of thy successors; I mean this,
unless there were some persons that persuade him to it, and such persons
as make an ill use of the facility they know there is to persuade young
men; for by such persons, not only young men are sometimes imposed upon,
but old men also, and by them sometimes are the most illustrious families
and kingdoms overturned."</p>
<p>3. Herod assented to what he had said, and, by degrees, abated of his
anger against Alexander, but was more angry at Pheroras; for the principal
subject of the four books was Pheroras; who perceiving that the king's
inclinations changed on a sudden, and that Archelaus's friendship could do
every thing with him, and that he had no honorable method of preserving
himself, he procured his safety by his impudence. So he left Alexander,
and had recourse to Archelaus, who told him that he did not see how he
could get him excused, now he was directly caught in so many crimes,
whereby it was evidently demonstrated that he had plotted against the
king, and had been the cause of those misfortunes which the young man was
now under, unless he would moreover leave off his cunning knavery, and his
denials of what he was charged withal, and confess the charge, and implore
pardon of his brother, who still had a kindness for him; but that if he
would do so, he would afford him all the assistance he was able.</p>
<p>4. With this advice Pheroras complied, and putting himself into such a
habit as might most move compassion, he came with black cloth upon his
body, and tears in his eyes, and threw himself down at Herod's feet, and
begged his pardon for what he had done, and confessed that he had acted
very wickedly, and was guilty of every thing that he had been accused of,
and lamented that disorder of his mind, and distraction which his love to
a woman, he said, had brought him to. So when Archelaus had brought
Pheroras to accuse and bear witness against himself, he then made an
excuse for him, and mitigated Herod's anger towards him, and this by using
certain domestical examples; for that when he had suffered much greater
mischiefs from a brother of his own, he prefered the obligations of nature
before the passion of revenge; because it is in kingdoms as it is in gross
bodies, where some member or other is ever swelled by the body's weight,
in which case it is not proper to cut off such member, but to heal it by a
gentle method of cure.</p>
<p>5. Upon Arehelaus's saying this, and much more to the same purpose,
Herod's displeasure against Pheroras was mollified; yet did he persevere
in his own indignation against Alexander, and said he would have his
daughter divorced, and taken away from him, and this till he had brought
Herod to that pass, that, contrary to his former behavior to him, he
petitioned Archelaus for the young man, and that he would let his daughter
continue espoused to him: but Archelaus made him strongly believe that he
would permit her to be married to any one else, but not to Alexander,
because he looked upon it as a very valuable advantage, that the relation
they had contracted by that affinity, and the privileges that went along
with it, might be preserved. And when the king said that his son would
take it for a great favor to him, if he would not dissolve that marriage,
especially since they had already children between the young man and her,
and since that wife of his was so well beloved by him, and that as while
she remains his wife she would be a great preservative to him, and keep
him from offending, as he had formerly done; so if she should be once torn
away from him, she would be the cause of his falling into despair, because
such young men's attempts are best mollified when they are diverted from
them by settling their affections at home. So Arehelaus complied with what
Herod desired, but not without difficulty, and was both himself reconciled
to the young man, and reconciled his father to him also. However, he said
he must, by all means, be sent to Rome to discourse with Caesar, because
he had already written a full account to him of this whole matter.</p>
<p>6. Thus a period was put to Archelaus's stratagem, whereby he delivered
his son-in-law out of the dangers he was in; but when these
reconciliations were over, they spent their time in feastings and
agreeable entertainments. And when Archelaus was going away, Herod made
him a present of seventy talents, with a golden throne set with precious
stones, and some eunuchs, and a concubine who was called Pannychis. He
also paid due honors to every one of his friends according to their
dignity. In like manner did all the king's kindred, by his command, make
glorious presents to Archelaus; and so he was conducted on his way by
Herod and his nobility as far as Antioch.</p>
<p><SPAN name="link2HCH0026" id="link2HCH0026"></SPAN></p>
<h2> CHAPTER 26. </h2>
<p>How Eurycles <SPAN href="#linknote-40" name="linknoteref-40"<br/> id="linknoteref-40">40</SPAN> Calumniated The Sons Of Mariamne; And How<br/>
Euaratus Of Cos's Apology For Them Had No Effect.<br/></p>
<p>1. Now a little afterward there came into Judea a man that was much
superior to Arehelaus's stratagems, who did not only overturn that
reconciliation that had been so wisely made with Alexander, but proved the
occasion of his ruin. He was a Lacedemonian, and his name was Eurycles. He
was so corrupt a man, that out of the desire of getting money, he chose to
live under a king, for Greece could not suffice his luxury. He presented
Herod with splendid gifts, as a bait which he laid in order to compass his
ends, and quickly received them back again manifold; yet did he esteem
bare gifts as nothing, unless he imbrued the kingdom in blood by his
purchases. Accordingly, he imposed upon the king by flattering him, and by
talking subtlely to him, as also by the lying encomiums which he made upon
him; for as he soon perceived Herod's blind side, so he said and did every
thing that might please him, and thereby became one of his most intimate
friends; for both the king and all that were about him had a great regard
for this Spartan, on account of his country. <SPAN href="#linknote-41"
name="linknoteref-41" id="linknoteref-41">41</SPAN></p>
<p>2. Now as soon as this fellow perceived the rotten parts of the family,
and what quarrels the brothers had one with another, and in what
disposition the father was towards each of them, he chose to take his
lodging at the first in the house of Antipater, but deluded Alexander with
a pretense of friendship to him, and falsely claimed to be an old
acquaintance of Archelaus; for which reason he was presently admitted into
Alexander's familiarity as a faithful friend. He also soon recommended
himself to his brother Aristobulus. And when he had thus made trial of
these several persons, he imposed upon one of them by one method, and upon
another by another. But he was principally hired by Antipater, and so
betrayed Alexander, and this by reproaching Antipater, because, while he
was the eldest son he overlooked the intrigues of those who stood in the
way of his expectations; and by reproaching Alexander, because he who was
born of a queen, and was married to a king's daughter, permitted one that
was born of a mean woman to lay claim to the succession, and this when he
had Archelaus to support him in the most complete manner. Nor was his
advice thought to be other than faithful by the young man, because of his
pretended friendship with Archelaus; on which account it was that
Alexander lamented to him Antipater's behavior with regard to himself, and
this without concealing any thing from him; and how it was no wonder if
Herod, after he had killed their mother, should deprive them of her
kingdom. Upon this Eurycles pretended to commiserate his condition, and to
grieve with him. He also, by a bait that he laid for him, procured
Aristobulus to say the same things. Thus did he inveigle both the brothers
to make complaints of their father, and then went to Antipater, and
carried these grand secrets to him. He also added a fiction of his own, as
if his brothers had laid a plot against him, and were almost ready to come
upon him with their drawn swords. For this intelligence he received a
great sum of money, and on that account he commended Antipater before his
father, and at length undertook the work of bringing Alexander and
Aristobulus to their graves, and accused them before their father. So he
came to Herod, and told him that he would save his life, as a requital for
the favors he had received from him, and would preserve his light [of
life] by way of retribution for his kind entertainment; for that a sword
had been long whetted, and Alexander's right hand had been long stretched
out against him; but that he had laid impediments in his way, prevented
his speed, and that by pretending to assist him in his design: how
Alexander said that Herod was not contented to reign in a kingdom that
belonged to others, and to make dilapidations in their mother's government
after he had killed her; but besides all this, that he introduced a
spurious successor, and proposed to give the kingdom of their ancestors to
that pestilent fellow Antipater:—that he would now appease the
ghosts of Hyrcanus and Mariamne, by taking vengeance on him; for that it
was not fit for him to take the succession to the government from such a
father without bloodshed: that many things happen every day to provoke him
so to do, insomuch that he can say nothing at all, but it affords occasion
for calumny against him; for that if any mention be made of nobility of
birth, even in other cases, he is abused unjustly, while his father would
say that nobody, to be sure, is of noble birth but Alexander, and that his
father was inglorious for want of such nobility. If they be at any time
hunting, and he says nothing, he gives offense; and if he commends any
body, they take it in way of jest. That they always find their father
unmercifully severe, and have no natural affection for any of them but for
Antipater; on which accounts, if this plot does not take, he is very
willing to die; but that in case he kill his father, he hath sufficient
opportunities for saving himself. In the first place, he hath Archelaus
his father-in-law to whom he can easily fly; and in the next place, he
hath Caesar, who had never known Herod's character to this day; for that
he shall not appear then before him with that dread he used to do when his
father was there to terrify him; and that he will not then produce the
accusations that concerned himself alone, but would, in the first place,
openly insist on the calamities of their nation, and how they are taxed to
death, and in what ways of luxury and wicked practices that wealth is
spent which was gotten by bloodshed; what sort of persons they are that
get our riches, and to whom those cities belong upon whom he bestows his
favors; that he would have inquiry made what became of his grandfather
[Hyrcanus], and his mother [Mariamne], and would openly proclaim the gross
wickedness that was in the kingdom; on which accounts he should not be
deemed a parricide.</p>
<p>3. When Eurycles had made this portentous speech, he greatly commended
Antipater, as the only child that had an affection for his father, and on
that account was an impediment to the other's plot against him. Hereupon
the king, who had hardly repressed his anger upon the former accusations,
was exasperated to an incurable degree. At which time Antipater took
another occasion to send in other persons to his father to accuse his
brethren, and to tell him that they had privately discoursed with Jucundus
and Tyrannus, who had once been masters of the horse to the king, but for
some offenses had been put out of that honorable employment. Herod was in
a very great rage at these informations, and presently ordered those men
to be tortured; yet did not they confess any thing of what the king had
been informed; but a certain letter was produced, as written by Alexander
to the governor of a castle, to desire him to receive him and Aristobulus
into the castle when he had killed his father, and to give them weapons,
and what other assistance he could, upon that occasion. Alexander said
that this letter was a forgery of Diophantus. This Diophantus was the
king's secretary, a bold man, and cunning in counterfeiting any one's
hand; and after he had counterfeited a great number, he was at last put to
death for it. Herod did also order the governor of the castle to be
tortured, but got nothing out of him of what the accusations suggested.</p>
<p>4. However, although Herod found the proofs too weak, he gave order to
have his sons kept in custody; for till now they had been at liberty. He
also called that pest of his family, and forger of all this vile
accusation, Eurycles, his savior and benefactor, and gave him a reward of
fifty talents. Upon which he prevented any accurate accounts that could
come of what he had done, by going immediately into Cappadocia, and there
he got money of Archelaus, having the impudence to pretend that he had
reconciled Herod to Alexander. He thence passed over into Greece, and used
what he had thus wickedly gotten to the like wicked purposes. Accordingly,
he was twice accused before Caesar, that he had filled Achaia with
sedition, and had plundered its cities; and so he was sent into
banishment. And thus was he punished for what wicked actions he had been
guilty of about Aristobulus and Alexander.</p>
<p>5. But it will now be worth while to put Euaratus of Cos in opposition to
this Spartan; for as he was one of Alexander's most intimate friends, and
came to him in his travels at the same time that Eurycles came; so the
king put the question to him, whether those things of which Alexander was
accused were true? He assured him upon oath that he had never heard any
such things from the young men; yet did this testimony avail nothing for
the clearing those miserable creatures; for Herod was only disposed and
most ready to hearken to what made against them, and every one was most
agreeable to him that would believe they were guilty, and showed their
indignation at them.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />