<h2><SPAN name="XXXII" id="XXXII"></SPAN>XXXII</h2>
<br/>
<p><i>The Bogus Proclamation—The Wade-Davis
Manifesto—Resignation of Mr.
Chase—Fessenden Succeeds Him—The Greeley
Peace Conference—Jaquess-Gilmore
Mission—Letter of Raymond—Bad Outlook for
the Election—Mr. Lincoln on the Issues of the
Campaign</i> —<i>President's Secret
Memorandum—Meeting of Democratic National
Convention—McClellan Nominated—His
Letter of Acceptance—Lincoln
Reëlected—His Speech on Night of
Election—The Electoral Vote—Annual
Message of December 6, 1864—Resignation of McClellan
from the Army</i></p>
<br/>
<br/>
<p>The seizure of the New York "Journal of Commerce" and New York
"World," in May, 1864, for publishing a forged proclamation calling
for four hundred thousand more troops, had caused great excitement
among the critics of Mr. Lincoln's administration. The terrible
slaughter of Grant's opening campaign against Richmond rendered the
country painfully sensitive to such news at the moment; and the
forgery, which proved to be the work of two young Bohemians of the
press, accomplished its purpose of raising the price of gold, and
throwing the Stock Exchange into a temporary fever. Telegraphic
announcement of the imposture soon quieted the flurry, and the
quick detection of the guilty parties reduced the incident to its
true rank; but the fact that the fiery Secretary of War had
meanwhile issued orders for the suppression of both newspapers and
the arrest of their editors was <SPAN name="page454" id="page454"></SPAN> neither forgiven nor
forgotten. The editors were never incarcerated, and the journals
resumed publication after an interval of only two days, but the
incident was vigorously employed during the entire summer as a
means of attack upon the administration.</p>
<p>Violent opposition to Mr. Lincoln came also from those members
of both Houses of Congress who disapproved his attitude on
reconstruction. Though that part of his message of December 8,
1863, relating to the formation of loyal State governments in
districts which had been in rebellion at first received
enthusiastic commendation from both conservatives and radicals, it
was soon evident that the millennium had not yet arrived, and that
in a Congress composed of men of such positive convictions and
vehement character, there were many who would not submit
permanently to the leadership of any man, least of all to that of
one so reasonable, so devoid of malice, as the President.</p>
<p>Henry Winter Davis at once moved that that part of the message
be referred to a special committee of which he was chairman, and on
February 15 reported a bill whose preamble declared the Confederate
States completely out of the Union; prescribing a totally different
method of reëstablishing loyal State governments, one of the
essentials being the prohibition of slavery. Congress rejected the
preamble, but after extensive debate accepted the bill, which
breathed the same spirit throughout. The measure was also finally
acceded to in the Senate, and came to Mr. Lincoln for signature in
the closing hours of the session. He laid it aside and went on with
other business, despite the evident anxiety of several friends, who
feared his failure to indorse it would lose the Republicans many
votes in the Northwest. In stating his attitude to his cabinet he
said:<SPAN name="page455" id="page455"></SPAN></p>
<p>"This bill and the position of these gentlemen seem to me, in
asserting that the insurrectionary States are no longer in the
Union, to make the fatal admission that States, whenever they
please, may of their own motion dissolve their connection with the
Union. Now we cannot survive that admission, I am convinced. If
that be true, I am not President; these gentlemen are not Congress.
I have laboriously endeavored to avoid that question ever since it
first began to be mooted, and thus to avoid confusion and
disturbance in our own councils. It was to obviate this question
that I earnestly favored the movement for an amendment to the
Constitution abolishing slavery, which passed the Senate and failed
in the House. I thought it much better, if it were possible, to
restore the Union without the necessity of a violent quarrel among
its friends as to whether certain States have been in or out of the
Union during the war—a merely metaphysical question and one
unnecessary to be forced into discussion."</p>
<p>But though every member of the cabinet agreed with him, he
foresaw the importance of the step he had resolved to take, and its
possible disastrous consequences to himself. When some one said
that the threats of the radicals were without foundation, and that
the people would not bolt their ticket on a question of
metaphysics, he answered:</p>
<p>"If they choose to make a point upon this, I do not doubt that
they can do harm. They have never been friendly to me. At all
events, I must keep some consciousness of being somewhere near
right. I must keep some standard or principle fixed within
myself."</p>
<p>Convinced, after fullest deliberation, that the bill was too
restrictive in its provisions, and yet unwilling to reject whatever
of practical good might be <SPAN name="page456" id="page456"></SPAN>accomplished by it, he
disregarded precedents, and acting on his lifelong rule of taking
the people into his confidence, issued a proclamation on July 8,
giving a copy of the bill of Congress, reciting the circumstances
under which it was passed, and announcing that while he was
unprepared by formal approval of the bill to be inflexibly
committed to any single plan of restoration, or to set aside the
free-State governments already adopted in Arkansas and Louisiana,
or to declare that Congress was competent to decree the abolishment
of slavery; yet he was fully satisfied with the plan as one very
proper method of reconstruction, and promised executive aid to any
State that might see fit to adopt it.</p>
<p>The great mass of Republican voters, who cared little for the
"metaphysics" of the case, accepted this proclamation, as they had
accepted that issued six months before, as the wisest and most
practicable method of handling the question; but among those
already hostile to the President, and those whose devotion to the
cause of freedom was so ardent as to make them look upon him as
lukewarm, the exasperation which was already excited increased. The
indignation of Mr. Davis and of Mr. Wade, who had called the bill
up in the Senate, at seeing their work thus brought to nothing,
could not be restrained; and together they signed and published in
the New York "Tribune" of August 5 the most vigorous attack ever
directed against the President from his own party; insinuating that
only the lowest motives dictated his action, since by refusing to
sign the bill he held the electoral votes of the rebel States at
his personal dictation; calling his approval of the bill of
Congress as a very proper plan for any State choosing to adopt it,
a "studied outrage"; and admonishing the people to "consider the
remedy of these <SPAN name="page457" id="page457"></SPAN>usurpations, and, having found it," to
"fearlessly execute it."</p>
<p>Congress had already repealed the fugitive-slave law, and to the
voters at large, who joyfully accepted the emancipation
proclamation, it mattered very little whether the "institution"
came to its inevitable end, in the fragments of territory where it
yet remained, by virtue of congressional act or executive decree.
This tempest over the method of reconstruction had, therefore,
little bearing on the presidential campaign, and appealed more to
individual critics of the President than to the mass of the
people.</p>
<p>Mr. Chase entered in his diary: "The President pocketed the
great bill.... He did not venture to veto, and so put it in his
pocket. It was a condemnation of his amnesty proclamation and of
his general policy of reconstruction, rejecting the idea of
possible reconstruction with slavery, which neither the President
nor his chief advisers have, in my opinion, abandoned." Mr. Chase
was no longer one of the chief advisers. After his withdrawal from
his hopeless contest for the presidency, his sentiments toward Mr.
Lincoln took on a tinge of bitterness which increased until their
friendly association in the public service became no longer
possible; and on June 30 he sent the President his resignation,
which was accepted. There is reason to believe that he did not
expect such a prompt severing of their official relations, since
more than once, in the months of friction which preceded this
culmination, he had used a threat to resign as means to carry some
point in controversy.</p>
<p>Mr. Lincoln, on accepting his resignation, sent the name of
David Tod of Ohio to the Senate as his successor; but, receiving a
telegram from Mr. Tod declining on the plea of ill health,
substituted that of<SPAN name="page458" id="page458"></SPAN> William Pitt Fessenden, chairman of the
Senate Committee on Finance, whose nomination was instantly
confirmed and commanded general approval.</p>
<p>Horace Greeley, editor of the powerful New York "Tribune," had
become one of those patriots whose discouragement and discontent
led them, during the summer of 1864, to give ready hospitality to
any suggestions to end the war. In July he wrote to the President,
forwarding the letter of one "Wm. Cornell Jewett of Colorado,"
which announced the arrival in Canada of two ambassadors from
Jefferson Davis with full powers to negotiate a peace. Mr. Greeley
urged, in his over-fervid letter of transmittal, that the President
make overtures on the following plan of adjustment: First. The
Union to be restored and declared perpetual. Second. Slavery to be
utterly and forever abolished. Third. A complete amnesty for all
political offenses. Fourth. Payment of four hundred million dollars
to the slave States, pro rata, for their slaves. Fifth. Slave
States to be represented in proportion to their total population.
Sixth. A national convention to be called at once.</p>
<p>Though Mr. Lincoln had no faith in Jewett's story, and doubted
whether the embassy had any existence, he determined to take
immediate action on this proposition. He felt the unreasonableness
and injustice of Mr. Greeley's letter, which in effect charged his
administration with a cruel disinclination to treat with the
rebels, and resolved to convince him at least, and perhaps others,
that there was no foundation for these reproaches. So he arranged
that the witness of his willingness to listen to any overtures that
might come from the South should be Mr. Greeley himself, and
answering his letter at once on July 9, said:</p>
<p>"If you can find any person, anywhere, professing <SPAN name="page459" id="page459"></SPAN>to have
any proposition of Jefferson Davis in writing, for peace, embracing
the restoration of the Union and abandonment of slavery, whatever
else it embraces, say to him he may come to me with you, and that
if he really brings such proposition he shall at the least have
safe conduct with the paper (and without publicity, if he chooses)
to the point where you shall have met him. The same if there be two
or more persons."</p>
<p>This ready acquiescence evidently surprised and somewhat
embarrassed Mr. Greeley, who replied by several letters of
different dates, but made no motion to produce his commissioners.
At last, on the fifteenth, to end a correspondence which promised
to be indefinitely prolonged, the President telegraphed him: "I was
not expecting you to send me a letter, but to bring me a man or
men." Mr. Greeley then went to Niagara, and wrote from there to the
alleged commissioners, Clement C. Clay and James P. Holcombe,
offering to conduct them to Washington, but neglecting to mention
the two conditions—restoration of the Union and abandonment
of slavery—laid down in Mr. Lincoln's note of the ninth and
repeated by him on the fifteenth. Even with this great advantage,
Clay and Holcombe felt themselves too devoid of credentials to
accept Mr. Greeley's offer, but replied that they could easily get
credentials, or that other agents could be accredited, if they
could be sent to Richmond armed with "the circumstances disclosed
in this correspondence."</p>
<p>This, of course, meant that Mr. Lincoln should take the
initiative in suing the Richmond authorities for peace on terms
proposed by them. The essential impossibility of these terms was
not, however, apparent to Mr. Greeley, who sent them on to
Washington, soliciting fresh instructions. With unwearied
patience,<SPAN name="page460" id="page460"></SPAN> Mr. Lincoln drew up a final paper, "To
Whom it may Concern," formally restating his position, and
despatched Major Hay with it to Niagara. This ended the conference;
the Confederates charging the President through the newspapers with
a "sudden and entire change of views"; while Mr. Greeley, being
attacked by his colleagues of the press for his action, could
defend himself only by implied censure of the President, utterly
overlooking the fact that his own original letter had contained the
identical propositions Mr. Lincoln insisted upon.</p>
<p>The discussion grew so warm that both he and his assailants at
last joined in a request to Mr. Lincoln to permit the publication
of the correspondence. This was, of course, an excellent
opportunity for the President to vindicate his own proceeding. But
he rarely looked at such matters from the point of view of personal
advantage, and he feared that the passionate, almost despairing
appeals of the most prominent Republican editor of the North for
peace at any cost, disclosed in the correspondence, would deepen
the gloom in the public mind and have an injurious effect upon the
Union cause. The spectacle of the veteran journalist, who was
justly regarded as the leading controversial writer on the
antislavery side, ready to sacrifice everything for peace, and
frantically denouncing the government for refusing to surrender the
contest, would have been, in its effect upon public opinion, a
disaster equal to the loss of a great battle. He therefore proposed
to Mr. Greeley, in case the letters were published, to omit some of
the most vehement passages; and took Mr. Greeley's refusal to
assent to this as a veto on their publication.</p>
<p>It was characteristic of him that, seeing the temper in which
Mr. Greeley regarded the transaction, he <SPAN name="page461" id="page461"></SPAN> dropped
the matter and submitted in silence to the misrepresentations to
which he was subjected by reason of it. Some thought he erred in
giving any hearing to the rebels; some criticized his choice of a
commissioner; and the opposition naturally made the most of his
conditions of negotiation, and accused him of embarking in a war of
extermination in the interests of the negro. Though making no
public effort to set himself right, he was keenly alive to their
attitude. To a friend he wrote:</p>
<p>"Saying reunion and abandonment of slavery would be considered,
if offered, is not saying that nothing else or less would be
considered, if offered.... Allow me to remind you that no one,
having control of the rebel armies, or, in fact, having any
influence whatever in the rebellion, has offered, or intimated, a
willingness to a restoration of the Union, in any event, or on any
condition whatever.... If Jefferson Davis wishes for himself, or
for the benefit of his friends at the North, to know what I would
do if he were to offer peace and reunion, saying nothing about
slavery, let him try me."</p>
<p>If the result of Mr. Greeley's Niagara efforts left any doubt
that peace was at present unattainable, the fact was demonstrated
beyond question by the published report of another unofficial and
volunteer negotiation which was proceeding at the same time. In
May, 1863, James F. Jaquess, D.D., a Methodist clergyman of piety
and religious enthusiasm, who had been appointed by Governor Yates
colonel of an Illinois regiment, applied for permission to go
South, urging that by virtue of his church relations he could,
within ninety days, obtain acceptable terms of peace from the
Confederates. The military superiors to whom he submitted the
request forwarded it to Mr.<SPAN name="page462" id="page462"></SPAN> Lincoln with a favorable indorsement;
and the President replied, consenting that they grant him a
furlough, if they saw fit, but saying:</p>
<p>"He cannot go with any government authority whatever. This is
absolute and imperative."</p>
<p>Eleven days later he was back again within Union lines, claiming
to have valuable "unofficial" proposals for peace. President
Lincoln paid no attention to his request for an interview, and in
course of time he returned to his regiment. Nothing daunted,
however, a year later he applied for and received permission to
repeat his visit, this time in company with J.R. Gilmore, a
lecturer and writer, but, as before, expressly without instruction
or authority from Mr. Lincoln. They went to Richmond, and had an
extended interview with Mr. Davis, during which they proposed to
him a plan of adjustment as visionary as it was unauthorized, its
central feature being a general election to be held over the whole
country, North and South, within sixty days, on the two
propositions,—peace with disunion and Southern independence,
or peace with Union, emancipation, no confiscation, and universal
amnesty,—the majority vote to decide, and the governments at
Washington and Richmond to be finally bound by the decision.</p>
<p>The interview resulted in nothing but a renewed declaration from
Mr. Davis that he would fight for separation to the bitter
end—a declaration which, on the whole, was of service to the
Union cause, since, to a great extent, it stopped the clamor of the
peace factionists during the presidential campaign. Not entirely,
however. There was still criticism enough to induce Henry J.
Raymond, chairman of the executive committee of the Republican
party, to write a letter on August 22, suggesting to Mr. Lincoln
that he ought <SPAN name="page463" id="page463"></SPAN> to appoint a commission in due form to
make proffers of peace to Davis on the sole condition of
acknowledging the supremacy of the Constitution; all other
questions to be settled in a convention of the people of all the
States.</p>
<p>Mr. Lincoln answered this patiently and courteously, framing, to
give point to his argument, an experimental draft of instructions
with which he proposed, in case such proffers were made, to send
Mr. Raymond himself to the rebel authorities. On seeing these in
black and white, Raymond, who had come to Washington to urge his
project, readily agreed with the President and Secretaries Seward,
Stanton, and Fessenden, that to carry it out would be worse than
losing the presidential contest: it would be ignominiously
surrendering it in advance.</p>
<p>"Nevertheless," wrote an inmate of the White House, "the visit
of himself and committee here did great good. They found the
President and cabinet much better informed than themselves, and
went home encouraged and cheered."</p>
<p>The Democratic managers had called the national convention of
their party to meet on the fourth of July, 1864; but after the
nomination of Frémont at Cleveland, and of Lincoln at
Baltimore, it was thought prudent to postpone it to a later date,
in the hope that something in the chapter of accidents might arise
to the advantage of the opposition. It appeared for a while as if
this manoeuver were to be successful. The military situation was
far from satisfactory. The terrible fighting of Grant's army in
Virginia had profoundly shocked and depressed the country; and its
movement upon Petersburg, so far without decisive results, had
contributed little hope or encouragement. The campaign of Sherman
in Georgia gave as yet no <SPAN name="page464" id="page464"></SPAN>positive assurance of the
brilliant results it afterward attained. The Confederate raid into
Maryland and Pennsylvania in July was the cause of great annoyance
and exasperation.</p>
<p>This untoward state of things in the field of military
operations found its exact counterpart in the political campaign.
Several circumstances contributed to divide and discourage the
administration party. The resignation of Mr. Chase had seemed to
not a few leading Republicans a presage of disintegration in the
government. Mr. Greeley's mission at Niagara Falls had unsettled
and troubled the minds of many. The Democrats, not having as yet
appointed a candidate or formulated a platform, were free to devote
all their leisure to attacks upon the administration. The rebel
emissaries in Canada, being in thorough concert with the leading
peace men of the North, redoubled their efforts to disturb the
public tranquility, and not without success. In the midst of these
discouraging circumstances the manifesto of Wade and Davis had
appeared to add its depressing influence to the general gloom.</p>
<p>Mr. Lincoln realized to the full the tremendous issues of the
campaign. Asked in August by a friend who noted his worn looks, if
he could not go away for a fortnight's rest, he replied:</p>
<p>"I cannot fly from my thoughts—my solicitude for this
great country follows me wherever I go. I do not think it is
personal vanity or ambition, though I am not free from these
infirmities, but I cannot but feel that the weal or woe of this
great nation will be decided in November. There is no program
offered by any wing of the Democratic party, but that must result
in the permanent destruction of the Union."</p>
<p>"But, Mr. President," his friend objected, "General<SPAN name="page465" id="page465"></SPAN> McClellan
is in favor of crushing out this rebellion by force. He will be the
Chicago candidate."</p>
<p>"Sir, the slightest knowledge of arithmetic will prove to any
man that the rebel armies cannot be destroyed by Democratic
strategy. It would sacrifice all the white men of the North to do
it. There are now in the service of the United States nearly one
hundred and fifty thousand able-bodied colored men, most of them
under arms, defending and acquiring Union territory. The Democratic
strategy demands that these forces be disbanded, and that the
masters be conciliated by restoring them to slavery.... You cannot
conciliate the South if you guarantee to them ultimate success; and
the experience of the present war proves their successes inevitable
if you fling the compulsory labor of millions of black men into
their side of the scale.... Abandon all the posts now garrisoned by
black men, take one hundred and fifty thousand men from our side
and put them in the battle-field or corn-field against us, and we
would be compelled to abandon the war in three weeks.... My enemies
pretend I am now carrying on this war for the sole purpose of
abolition. So long as I am President it shall be carried on for the
sole purpose of restoring the Union. But no human power can subdue
this rebellion without the use of the emancipation policy and every
other policy calculated to weaken the moral and physical forces of
the rebellion.... Let my enemies prove to the country that the
destruction of slavery is not necessary to a restoration of the
Union. I will abide the issue."</p>
<p>The political situation grew still darker. When at last, toward
the end of August, the general gloom had enveloped even the
President himself, his action was most original and characteristic.
Feeling that the <SPAN name="page466" id="page466"></SPAN> campaign was going against him, he made
up his mind deliberately as to the course he should pursue, and
laid down for himself the action demanded by his conviction of
duty. He wrote on August 23 the following memorandum:</p>
<p>"This morning, as for some days past, it seems exceedingly
probable that this administration will not be reëlected. Then
it will be my duty to so coöperate with the President-elect as
to save the Union between the election and the inauguration, as he
will have secured his election on such ground that he cannot
possibly save it afterwards."</p>
<p>He then folded and pasted the sheet in such manner that its
contents could not be read, and as the cabinet came together he
handed this paper to each member successively, requesting them to
write their names across the back of it. In this peculiar fashion
he pledged himself and the administration to accept loyally the
anticipated verdict of the people against him, and to do their
utmost to save the Union in the brief remainder of his term of
office. He gave no intimation to any member of his cabinet of the
nature of the paper they had signed until after his
reëlection.</p>
<p>The Democratic convention was finally called to meet in Chicago
on August 29. Much had been expected by the peace party from the
strength and audacity of its adherents in the Northwest; and,
indeed, the day of the meeting of the convention was actually the
date appointed by rebel emissaries in Canada for an outbreak which
should effect that revolution in the northwestern States which had
long been their chimerical dream. This scheme of the American
Knights, however, was discovered and guarded against through the
usual treachery of some of their members; and it <SPAN name="page467" id="page467"></SPAN> is
doubtful if the Democrats reaped any real, permanent advantage from
the delay of their convention.</p>
<p>On coming together, the only manner in which the peace men and
war Democrats could arrive at an agreement was by mutual deception.
The war Democrats, led by the delegation from New York, were
working for a military candidate; while the peace Democrats, under
the leadership of Vallandigham, who had returned from Canada and
was allowed to remain at large through the half-contemptuous and
half-calculated leniency of the government he defied, bent all
their energies to a clear statement of their principles in the
platform.</p>
<p>Both got what they desired. General McClellan was nominated on
the first ballot, and Vallandigham wrote the only plank worth
quoting in the platform. It asserted: "That after four years of
failure to restore the Union by the experiment of war, during which
... the Constitution itself has been disregarded in every part,"
public welfare demands "that immediate efforts be made for a
cessation of hostilities." It is altogether probable that this
distinct proposition of surrender to the Confederates might have
been modified or defeated in full convention if the war Democrats
had had the courage of their convictions; but they were so intent
upon the nomination of McClellan, that they considered the platform
of secondary importance, and the fatal resolutions were adopted
without debate.</p>
<p>Mr. Vallandigham, having thus taken possession of the
convention, next adopted the candidate, and put the seal of his
sinister approval on General McClellan by moving that his
nomination be made unanimous, which was done amid great cheering.
George H. Pendleton was nominated for Vice-President, and the
<SPAN name="page468" id="page468"></SPAN> convention adjourned—not <i>sine
die</i>, as is customary, but "subject to be called at any time and
place the executive national committee shall designate." The
motives of this action were not avowed, but it was taken as a
significant warning that the leaders of the Democratic party held
themselves ready for any extraordinary measures which the
exigencies of the time might provoke or invite.</p>
<p>The New-Yorkers, however, had the last word, for Governor
Seymour, in his letter as chairman of the committee to inform
McClellan of his nomination, assured him that "those for whom we
speak were animated with the most earnest, devoted, and prayerful
desire for the salvation of the American Union"; and the general,
knowing that the poison of death was in the platform, took occasion
in his letter of acceptance to renew his assurances of devotion to
the Union, the Constitution, the laws, and the flag of his country.
After having thus absolutely repudiated the platform upon which he
was nominated, he coolly concluded:</p>
<p>"Believing that the views here expressed are those of the
convention and the people you represent, I accept the
nomination."</p>
<p>His only possible chance of success lay, of course, in his war
record. His position as a candidate on a platform of dishonorable
peace would have been no less desperate than ridiculous. But the
stars in their courses fought against the Democratic candidates.
Even before the convention that nominated them, Farragut had won
the splendid victory of Mobile Bay; during the very hours when the
streets of Chicago were blazing with Democratic torches, Hood was
preparing to evacuate Atlanta; and the same newspaper that printed
Vallandigham's peace platform announced Sherman's entrance into the
manufacturing metropolis of Georgia.<SPAN name="page469" id="page469"></SPAN> The darkest hour had
passed; dawn was at hand, and amid the thanksgivings of a grateful
people, and the joyful salutes of great guns, the presidential
campaign began.</p>
<p>When the country awoke to the true significance of the Chicago
platform, the successes of Sherman excited the enthusiasm of the
people, and the Unionists, arousing from their midsummer languor,
began to show their confidence in the Republican candidate, the
hopelessness of all efforts to undermine him became evident.</p>
<p>The electoral contest began with the picket firing in Vermont
and Maine in September, was continued in what might be called the
grand guard fighting in October in the great States of
Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Indiana, and the final battle took place
all along the line on November 8. To Mr. Lincoln this was one of
the most solemn days of his life. Assured of his personal success,
and made devoutly confident by the military successes of the last
few weeks that the day of peace and the reëstablishment of the
Union was at hand, he felt no elation, and no sense of triumph over
his opponents. The thoughts that filled his mind were expressed in
the closing sentences of the little speech he made in response to a
group of serenaders that greeted him when, in the early morning
hours, he left the War Department, where he had gone on the evening
of election to receive the returns:</p>
<p>"I am thankful to God for this approval of the people; but,
while deeply grateful for this mark of their confidence in me, if I
know my heart, my gratitude is free from any taint of personal
triumph. I do not impugn the motives of any one opposed to me. It
is no pleasure to me to triumph over any one, but I give thanks to
the Almighty for this evidence of the <SPAN name="page470" id="page470"></SPAN>people's
resolution to stand by free government and the rights of
humanity."</p>
<p>Lincoln and Johnson received a popular majority of 411,281, and
two hundred and twelve out of two hundred and thirty-three
electoral votes, only those of New Jersey, Delaware, and Kentucky,
twenty-one in all, being cast for McClellan. In his annual message
to Congress, which met on December 5, President Lincoln gave the
best summing up of the results of the election that has ever been
written:</p>
<p>"The purpose of the people within the loyal States to maintain
the integrity of the Union was never more firm nor more nearly
unanimous than now.... No candidate for any office whatever, high
or low, has ventured to seek votes on the avowal that he was for
giving up the Union. There have been much impugning of motives and
much heated controversy as to the proper means and best mode of
advancing the Union cause; but on the distinct issue of Union or no
Union the politicians have shown their instinctive knowledge that
there is no diversity among the people. In affording the people the
fair opportunity of showing one to another and to the world this
firmness and unanimity of purpose, the election has been of vast
value to the national cause."</p>
<p>On the day of election General McClellan resigned his commission
in the army, and the place thus made vacant was filled by the
appointment of General Philip H. Sheridan, a fit type and
illustration of the turn in the tide of affairs, which was to sweep
from that time rapidly onward to the great decisive national
triumph.</p>
<hr style="width: 65%;" />
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<SPAN name="page471" id="page471"></SPAN>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />