<h2><SPAN name="Letter_18" id="Letter_18"></SPAN>Letter 18.</h2>
<p class="right"><span class="smcap">London.</span></p>
<p><span class="smcap">Dear Charley</span>:—</p>
<p class="text">It was a fine, clear morning when we started
for Windsor by railroad, a distance of twenty-one
miles. The country is fine; but our thoughts were
on the castle. At Slough we took an omnibus, and
rode into the town. It is a pretty, quiet place, of
about ten thousand inhabitants. There are some
six or seven streets, and they present but few attractions.
The castle is every thing. You know
this has been the favorite residence of most of the
English monarchs, and the scene of many a tournament
in the days of chivalry. The castle was the
work of William the Conqueror. John lived at
Windsor while Magna Charta was extorted from
him by his barons at Runnymede. Henry III. did
a great deal to the castle, but Edward III. invested
it with its great glory. This was his native place.
The architect he employed was the famous William
of Wykeham, Bishop of Winchester, a man of great
genius. He built the noble round tower. This
was in 1315. Wykeham built him a palace worthy
of the hero and his noble son, the Black Prince.
Edward IV. built St. George's Chapel, and Henry
VII. and Henry VIII. both made important additions
<span class='pagenum'><SPAN class="page" name="Page_128" id="Page_128" title="128"></SPAN></span>to the fortress. Young Edward VI. resided here,
and did not like its retirement and gloom. Elizabeth
made the terrace and other improvements.
When Charles II. was restored, he brought a foreign
taste to the improvement of the castle, and a
great deal of elegancy was attempted, but which
poorly harmonized with the Gothic, baronial style
of Wykeham's works.</p>
<p class="text">George IV. was a man of exquisite taste, and he
employed Sir Jeffry Wyatville to carry out the plans
of Edward III. and his architect. This was in
1824, and his immense labors have been successful.
These improvements cost two million pounds sterling.
I ought to say that Windsor Castle was the
favorite home of George III., who died here. This
palace stands on a lofty chalk hill, and commands
the valley of the Thames. Around it is the finest,
terrace in the world, the descent from which is faced
with a rampart of freestone extending about seventeen
hundred feet. The whole building occupies
about twelve acres.</p>
<p class="text">I shall not describe all the towers, for there are
some dozen or fifteen. The round tower of Edward
III. is the chief one. Here he revived the
round table of King Arthur, and established the
Order of the Garter. From the battlements of this
strong fortress you gaze upon no less than twelve
counties. Prince Albert is constable of this tower.
<span class='pagenum'><SPAN class="page" name="Page_129" id="Page_129" title="129"></SPAN></span>This was the old prison, or donjon of the castle.
Here James I. of Scotland was a prisoner, and here
he wrote his sweet verses and celebrated Nature's
beauties and the praises of his lady-love, Jane Beaufort.
Here, too, Henry Howard, Earl of Surrey,
long suffered, and sung the sweetest lays. We had
a ticket to see the state apartments. Suffice it to
say that we went through the Queen's Audience
Chamber, the Vandyke Room, the Queen's State
Drawing Boom or Zuccharelle Room, the State
Ante-Room, the Grand Staircase and Vestibule, the
Waterloo Chamber, the Grand Ball Room, St.
George's Hall, the Guard Chamber, the Queen's
Presence Chamber. All these are very, very beautiful.
I was delighted with the Vandyke Room.
Here are twenty-two undoubted productions of
this greatest of portrait painters. Charles I. and
Henrietta were favorite subjects with the artist.
Here are several of them and their children, and
they are to be found elsewhere. The equestrian
portrait of Charles I. is a truly grand picture. You
know the beautiful old copy, of a cabinet size, which
we have in the study at home: it will please me
more than ever, since I know how faithful it is.
That queen of Charles's who made him so much
trouble with her Popery and temper was a wonderfully
beautiful woman. I should not soon be weary
looking at her portrait. She was daughter of
<span class='pagenum'><SPAN class="page" name="Page_130" id="Page_130" title="130"></SPAN></span>Henry IV. of France. Her fortune was hard, to
lose a father by an assassin, and a husband by the
executioner. The Gobelin tapestry, illustrating the
life of Esther, in the Audience Room, is very rich.
In the State Ante-Room are the most wonderful
carvings of fowl, fish, fruit, and flowers, by Grinling
Gibbons. They are thought to be unsurpassed in
this department of art. On the Great Staircase is
a noble colossal marble statue, of that excellent sovereign,
but bad man, George IV. It is by Chantrey.
The Waterloo Chamber is adorned with thirty-eight
portraits of men connected with Waterloo, and
twenty-nine of them are by Sir Thomas Lawrence.
St. George's Hall is two hundred feet long, thirty-four
wide, thirty-two high, and contains some fine
portraits of sovereigns by Vandyke, Lely, Kneller,
Gainsborough, and Lawrence. On twenty-four shields
are the arms of each sovereign of the Order of the
Garter, from Edward III. to William IV. The
Guard Chamber is a noble room, eighty feet in
length. Immediately on entering, we were struck
with the colossal bust of Nelson by Chantrey, A
piece of the mast of the Victory, shot through by a
cannon ball, forms its fitting pedestal. Here, too,
we saw the busts of the great Duke of Marlborough
by Rysbach, and the Duke of Wellington by Chantrey,
and their two banners, by the annual presentation
of which to the reigning sovereign, on the
<span class='pagenum'><SPAN class="page" name="Page_131" id="Page_131" title="131"></SPAN></span>anniversaries of Blenheim and Waterloo, they hold
the estates of Blenheim and Strathfieldsaye. There
are figures in armor representing the Duke of
Brunswick, 1530; Lord Howard, 1588; Earl of
Essex, 1596; Charles I., when Prince of Wales, 1620;
and Prince Rupert, 1635. These suits of armor are
the genuine ones which were worn by these characters
in their lifetime. One thing greatly delighted me—it
was the gorgeous shield, executed by Benvenuto Cellini,
and presented by Francis I. to Henry VIII. at the
Field of the Cloth of Gold. The workmanship is
entirely beyond anything I had imagined possible
for delicacy of finish. I hardly wonder that kings
used to quarrel for the residence of this artist.</p>
<p class="text">I know, Charley, you are impatient to hear about
St. George's Chapel, of which you have so often
expressed your admiration, when we have looked at
the beautiful engravings of its interior, at home. It
is very fine, and should be seen to be comprehended.
It is of what is called the perpendicular Gothic
style. The interior is divided by a screen and organ
gallery, into the body of the church, and the choir.
These have side aisles, and in these are five separate
little chapels. Two of these make up the place of
transepts, and the other three, and the chapter
house, form abutments at each angle of the chapel.
Now, I think, you can't fail to get an idea of the
building.</p>
<p class="text"><span class='pagenum'><SPAN class="page" name="Page_132" id="Page_132" title="132"></SPAN></span>The choir is filled with the stalls and banners of
the knights of the garter. Each knight has his
banner, helmet, crest, and sword.</p>
<p class="text">The great pointed window was <i>designed</i> by our
countryman, Benjamin West. The altar-piece was
painted by West. Here is the tomb of Edward IV.,
1483. He lies under a slab of black marble. In
1789, some workmen discovered his lead coffin, and
it was opened, and the skeleton was in good preservation,
and measured seven feet in length. Horace
Walpole obtained a lock of his hair at this time.
Here are the graves of Henry VI., and of Henry
VIII. and his queen, Jane Seymour. Also of
Charles I.</p>
<p class="text">Lord Byron says of Henry VIII.'s tomb,</p>
<div class="poem"><div class="stanza">
<span class="i0">"Famed for contemptuous breach of sacred ties,<br/></span>
<span class="i0">By headless Charles, see heartless Henry lies"<br/></span></div>
</div>
<p class="text">On the 1st of April, 1813, the coffin of Charles I.
was found in Henry VIII.'s tomb; and I think you
will be pleased with an account of what, transpired.
I shall, therefore, copy a paper which is authentic:</p>
<p class="text">"On completing the mausoleum which his present
majesty has built in the Tomb House, as it is called,
it was necessary to form a passage to it from under
the choir of St George's Chapel. In constructing
this passage, an aperture was made accidentally, in
one of the walls of the vault of King Henry
<span class='pagenum'><SPAN class="page" name="Page_133" id="Page_133" title="133"></SPAN></span>VIII., through which the workmen were enabled to
see, not only the two coffins which were supposed to
contain the bodies of King Henry VIII. and Queen
Jane Seymour, but a third also, covered with a
black velvet pall, which, from Mr. Herbert's narrative,
might fairly be presumed to hold the remains
of King Charles I.</p>
<p class="text">"On representing the circumstance to the Prince
Regent, his Royal Highness perceived at once that a
doubtful point in history might be cleared up by
opening this vault; and, accordingly, his Royal Highness
ordered an examination to be made on the first
convenient opportunity. This was done on the 1st
of April last, 1813,—the day after the funeral of the
Duchess of Brunswick,—in the presence of his
Royal Highness himself; who guarantied, thereby,
the most respectful care and attention to the remains
of the dead during the inquiry. His Royal Highness
was accompanied by his Royal Highness the Duke of
Cumberland, Count Munster, the Dean of Windsor,
Benjamin Charles Stevenson, Esq., and Sir Henry
Halford.</p>
<p class="text">"The vault is covered by an arch half a breadth
in thickness; is seven feet two inches in width, nine
feet six inches in length, and four feet ten inches in
height, and <i>is situated in the centre of the choir, opposite
the eleventh knight's stall, on the sovereign's side</i>.</p>
<p class="text">"On removing the pall, a plain leaden coffin, with
<span class='pagenum'><SPAN class="page" name="Page_134" id="Page_134" title="134"></SPAN></span>no appearance of ever having been enclosed in
wood, and bearing an inscription, 'King Charles,
1648,' in large, legible characters, on a scroll of lead
encircling it, immediately presented itself to the
view. A square opening was then made in the
upper part of the lid, of such dimensions as to admit a
clear insight into its contents. These were an internal
wooden coffin, very much decayed, and the body
carefully wrapped up in cerecloth, into the folds of
which a quantity of unctuous or greasy matter, mixed
with resin, as it seemed, had been melted, so as to
exclude, as effectually as possible, the external air.
The coffin was completely full, and, from-the tenacity
of the cerecloth, great difficulty was experienced in
detaching it successfully from the parts which it developed.
Wherever the unctuous matter had insinuated
itself, the separation of the cerecloth was easy;
and when it came off, a correct impression of the
features to which it had been applied was observed
in the unctuous substance. At length the whole face
was disengaged from its covering. The complexion of
the skin of it was dark and discolored. The
forehead and temples had lost little or nothing of
their muscular substance. The cartilage of the nose
was gone, but the left eye, in the first moment of
exposure, was open and full, though it vanished
almost immediately; and the pointed beard, so
characteristic of the reign of King Charles, was
<span class='pagenum'><SPAN class="page" name="Page_135" id="Page_135" title="135"></SPAN></span>perfect The shape of the face was a long oval.
Many of the teeth remained, and the left ear, in
consequence of the interposition of some unctuous
matter between it and the cerecloth, was found
entire. It was difficult at this moment to withhold
a declaration, that, notwithstanding its disfigurement,
the countenance did bear a strong resemblance
to the coins, the busts, and especially to the picture
of King Charles I. by Vandyke, by which it had
been made familiar to us. It is true that the minds
of the spectators of this interesting sight were well
prepared to receive this impression; but it is also
certain that such a facility of belief had been occasioned
by the simplicity and truth of Mr. Herbert's
narrative, every part of which had been confirmed
by the investigation, so far as it had advanced; and
it will not be denied that the shape of the face, the
forehead, an eye, and the beard, are the most important
features by which resemblance is determined.
When the head had been entirely disengaged from
the attachments which confined it; it was found to be
loose, and without any difficulty was taken up and
held to view. It was quite <i>wet</i>, and gave a greenish-red
tinge to paper and linen which touched it. The
back part of the scalp was entirely perfect, and had
a remarkably fresh appearance—the pores of the
skin being more distinct, as they usually are when
soaked in moisture, and the tendons and ligaments
<span class='pagenum'><SPAN class="page" name="Page_136" id="Page_136" title="136"></SPAN></span>of the neck were of considerable substance and
firmness. The hair was thick at the back part of
the head, and, in appearance, nearly black. A portion
of it, which has since been cleaned and dried,
is of a beautiful dark-brown color. That of the
beard was of a redder brown. On the back part of
the head it was about an inch in length, and had
probably been cut so short for the convenience of
the executioner, or, perhaps, in order to furnish
memorials of the unhappy king. On holding up
the head to examine the place of separation from
the body, the muscles of the neck had evidently
retracted themselves considerably, and the fourth
cervical vertebra was found to be cut through its
substance transversely, leaving the surfaces of the
divided portions perfectly smooth and even; an appearance
which could only have been produced by a
heavy blow, inflicted with a very sharp instrument,
and which furnished the last proof wanting to
identify Charles I. After this examination, which
served every purpose in view, and without examining
the body below the neck; it was immediately restored
to its situation, the coffin was soldered up
again, and the vault closed."</p>
<p class="text">This state of things precisely tallied with the account
which Herbert, the faithful servant of Charles,
had given as to the place of his sepulture.</p>
<p class="text">In this chapel, too, is the cenotaph of the late
<span class='pagenum'><SPAN class="page" name="Page_137" id="Page_137" title="137"></SPAN></span>Princess Charlotte, who was wife to Leopold, now
King of Belgium. I do not much admire it.</p>
<p class="text">The exquisite beauty of the windows, and the
gorgeous splendor of the roof, will always make
this place live in my memory. The terraces are
very beautiful walks; and from Queen Elizabeth's
terrace you have a noble view of Eton College.
Of course, we were pleased to see "the distant spires
and antique towers" which are so celebrated in the
lines of Gray. The college looms up finely, and
greatly adds to the prospect. Eton was founded in
1440, by Henry VI. The number of scholars is
about eight hundred and fifty. This college has
produced some of the greatest men in England, and
the young nobility are generally educated here. The
college has two quadrangles, and the chapel is a fine
Gothic building. All this region is beautified by the
Thames winding through the valley. Here is the
gem of villages, Datchett, where Sir Henry Wotton
and Izaak Walton used to enjoy the rod and line.
No one who has any taste can come to Windsor and
not think of the immortal bard who has made so
much capital out of this place. At all events, we
wanted to see Herne's Oak.</p>
<p class="text">We took a carriage and passed the day in riding
through the great park, and took our way through
the well-known avenue, called the Long Walk. This
is three miles in length, and has a double row of
<span class='pagenum'><SPAN class="page" name="Page_138" id="Page_138" title="138"></SPAN></span>magnificent elms. It is directly in front of the
south side of the castle, and terminates in a colossal
equestrian statue of George III., standing on an
immense pedestal of blocks of granite. Nothing
can exceed in beauty the beeches of this park,
which contains three thousand acres. Immense
herds of deer are seen under the trees. Nowhere
have I seen such fine old trees. Here is a beech-tree
thirty-six feet round, seven feet from the ground!
One oak of similar size is called William the Conqueror's
Oak. We went to Virginia Water, the
largest sheet of water—that is, artificial—in Great
Britain. We saw the little cottage where George
IV. passed so much of his time. It is a pretty place,
but it only shows that the mind is more likely to be
pleased with the simple than the grand.</p>
<p class="text">The gardener at the cottage—which I think is
called Cumberland Lodge—showed us through the
conservatory. We did not much admire the Fishing
Temple, or the floating miniature navy. The scenery
is charming, and worthy of Poussin. The
walk by the water, to the tavern, cannot be surpassed.
On our return we passed Frogmore, the
residence of the Duchess of Kent; it seems a pretty,
unpretending place.</p>
<p class="text">Nothing would repay the tourist better than to
pass three or four days, in this vicinity. Village
after village, and villa after villa, claims the admiration
<span class='pagenum'><SPAN class="page" name="Page_139" id="Page_139" title="139"></SPAN></span>of the traveller; and perhaps England has no more
beautiful rural scenery than may here be found.
We had seven or eight hours of perfect delight upon
our ride; and when we reached the White Hart, at
Windsor, we were well prepared for doing justice to
an excellent dinner. Our pleasure at Windsor was
much increased by the company of a gentleman of
high literary reputation, and who is distinguished as
the author of several successful works.</p>
<p class="center">Affectionately yours,</p>
<p class="right"><span class="smcap">weld</span></p>
<hr style="width: 65%;" />
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />