<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_VI">CHAPTER VI</h2>
<h3>COLD AND ICE ON THE EARTH</h3></div>
<p>The astronomers who look at the planet Mars tell
us that at the Northern and Southern Poles there
are great areas of snow, very much greater than
the arctic regions of the earth, for the south polar area
alone occupies 11,330,000 square miles. But the geological
records of the earth show that our own arctic
regions once extended very much farther than they do
at present, a fact which need not in any way surprise
us, for as we have already remarked, snow and ice are
very largely a matter of the nearness of the sea to the
land. We may put the same thing in another way by
saying that winter cold and summer heat depend largely
on the distribution of sea and land. Thus Venice, which
is not very much farther from the North Pole than
Vladivostok, has an altogether different climate, and inhabitants
of the Shetland Isles have a very different kind
of climatic experience from those who delve by the
frozen Yukon. There is another consideration which is
sometimes overlooked. We do not think of the earth
as a very warm body. But at its very coldest part, where
the thermometer goes down to seventy or ninety degrees
<span class="pagenum" id="Page_68">-68-</span>
below freezing, it is several hundreds of degrees warmer
than the space outside the earth. Midway between
the earth and the moon the temperature must be 430° F.
below freezing; so that if we take the surface of the
earth as a whole we may say that it is between four
hundred and five hundred degrees warmer than the space
by which it is surrounded. Every one knows what is
happening when he warms his hands at a fire. The fire
being hotter than its surroundings is giving out heat
towards them, and the hands catch some of this radiated
heat. Similarly the earth is radiating heat, and the
atmosphere round the earth catches some of it. So also
do the seas. While therefore it is certain that the heat
of the sun warms the earth and the air and the sea, and
so gives rise to currents of air and perhaps of water, so
also is it likely that the heat of the earth causes warm
air to rise, and so plays its part in forming the winds,
the currents of air, and the currents of water. When
the earth was warmer than it is now it had more and
greater effects in this direction. It caused more evaporation
of the water, more clouds, and therefore more rain,
and in winter more snow.</p>
<p>Suppose, then, a period when there was very much
more snow in winter than now. As the snow accumulated
layer on layer the lower part would become squeezed into a
mass half ice, half snow; and it is quite likely that the
heat of the summer sun (especially if, as we have supposed,
the atmosphere was much cloudier then than now) would
be unable to dissolve it. Thus the snow age would
gradually merge into an ice age, and we can imagine a
<span class="pagenum" id="Page_69">-69-</span>
period when a great deal of Europe was covered with
snow or ice as Greenland is to-day. What records would
it leave behind? Now, on slopes the sheet of snow would
tend to slip just as it slips from sloping house-roofs. In
doing so it would push before it any loose material which
lay in front of it; and trees or bushes, stone or soil,
would be gradually pushed downhill. If the slopes were
steep enough the snow-sheets would occasionally break off
and sweep down as avalanches. Sometimes these great
masses are many thousands of square yards in area and
fifty feet thick, and in the late winter and early spring
often do immense damage, carrying away houses, trees,
and great masses of rocks in their progress. They
leave their imprint not only in ground swept bare,
but in huge mounds of debris piled up in the valleys
below.</p>
<p>But when the snow has taken the form of a glacier its
record is left in more unmistakable characters. Imagine
a great mass of snow and ice descending between the clefts
of mountains to lower levels. As it slips slowly down its
valley, like a very slow river—slower than a river of
thickest mud or pitch or lava would be—earth, sand, mud,
gravel, boulders, and masses of rock sometimes are washed
down on its surface from the slopes on either side.
Avalanches will occasionally bring other contributions.
Nearly all this rubbish accumulates on the edges of the
glacier nearest the slopes, and it is slowly borne to the
journey's end on the glacier's shoulders. Some of it falls
into rents or crevasses in the ice, and may be imprisoned
there and carried down as an inside passenger, or it may
<span class="pagenum" id="Page_70">-70-</span>
reach the rocky floor over which the ice is sliding. Its
progress then resembles that of the Irish gentleman who
was travelling in a Sedan chair out of which the seat and
the bottom had fallen, and who said that if 'twere not for
the fashion of the thing he'd as lief walk. The rubbish
borne onward on the surface of the glacier is known as
<i>moraine-stuff</i>, and the mounds of it at the edge of the
glacier are called <i>lateral moraines</i>. Where two glaciers
unite like two rivers, their moraines, right-hand and left-hand,
will join, and in the new glacier a new moraine will
appear running down the middle, and so called a <i>medial
moraine</i>. Where a glacier has many tributaries bearing
a good deal of moraine-stuff, its surface may be like a
bare plain so covered with stones that the ice beneath can
hardly be discerned except here and there. At the end
of the glacier where the ice melts, the heaps of stones,
ever adding to their numbers, are deposited in heaps, to
which are given the name of the <i>terminal moraine</i>.</p>
<p>With such tokens of their existence as this, glaciers, as
will readily be understood, leave visiting-cards in history
that cannot easily be mistaken. Even existing glaciers
tell strange stories. Nowadays glaciers are carefully measured
and examined both in Switzerland and in Canada.
During the last decade of the nineteenth century and the
first decade of the twentieth the Swiss glaciers were found
to show signs of receding farther up their valleys. The
same thing has been observed about some of the Canadian
glaciers. There are several plausible reasons for this.
Professor Schaeberle says that the earth is growing cooler,
and that in the temperate regions the winter rainfall
<span class="pagenum" id="Page_71">-71-</span>
(which would turn to falls of snow in the mountains) is
less than it has been. It is certain that a shortage of
winter rain over a number of years in succession would
account for the shrinkage of the glaciers, but it is not by
any means certain that a number of dry winters will not
be followed by wet ones, in which case the glaciers would
increase again. Some of the glaciers show that during
their existence they have shrunk and lengthened alternately
like gutta-percha in a variable climate. How do we
know that they have shrunk and lengthened? The
<i>moraines</i> of which we have spoken give us the testimony.
As a glacier shrinks either in length or in breadth and
depth it leaves the blocks of rock at its edges stranded on
the sides of the valley. Such perched blocks or <i>erratics</i>
are the best of glacier marks, and their great size, some of
them as large as a cheap villa residence, is such that no
current of water could have brought them there. They
are often poised on the tops of crags, on the very edges of
precipices, or on steep slopes, where they could never have
been left by any flood, even had the flood been able to
move them. The only thing that could have carried
them must have been a vehicle that moved very, very
slowly and deposited them very, very gently—in fact,
glacier ice. We can see blocks like this on the glaciers
now, and others stranded at the sides. In the Swiss
valleys the scattered ice-borne boulders may be seen by
hundreds far above the glaciers and far beyond the places
where the glaciers end. We <i>know</i> they must have been
left by glaciers, and by inference we surmise that when we
find a valley filled with them, then, though the valley
<span class="pagenum" id="Page_72">-72-</span>
may have no glacier now, it must have once been occupied
by one.</p>
<p>These erratic blocks, now found all over Europe, tell
us a good deal about the ice on which they were transported.
The blocks that fall on the edges of the glacier
remain on the side where they descend. Hence, if there
is any notable difference in the composition of the rocks
on either side of the valley, the existence of this difference
will be preserved in the <i>moraines</i>. If, therefore, in a
country where the glaciers have disappeared we can trace
the scattered blocks up to their sources among the
mountains, we can say what was the track followed by
the prehistoric glaciers. In Europe there are several
examples of the uses of this detective evidence. Thus
the peculiar blocks of the Valais mountains can be
traced right on to Lyons; and this shows us that the
glacier from which the River Rhone sprang extended
once right across the east of France to Lyons, and
probably farther. It was therefore once at least 170
miles longer. Similarly, blocks which are exactly like
the characteristic rocks peculiar to Southern Scandinavia
are found in Northern Germany, Belgium, and East
Anglia; and we therefore believe that a great sheet of
ice once filled up the Baltic and the German Ocean,
carrying with it immense numbers of northern "erratics."
In our own country, in fact, glacier boulders are found in
nearly every county, and show that once the greater part
of the country was buried under ice.</p>
<p>But, as we have said, it is not only on its shoulders, but
in its interior and beneath its base that a glacier rolls
<span class="pagenum" id="Page_73">-73-</span>
and pushes its rubbish along. It is not all stones.
Clay and earth mingle with it, often enclosing the stones;
and the debris left by extinct glaciers of ages ago is sometimes
called the boulder-clay. This is the deposit, earthy
and stony, that the glacier leaves on the floor of the
valley as it shrinks—unless the river which usually
springs from the end of glaciers sweeps it away. Most
of the stones thus left are smoothed or polished and
covered with scratches or ruts, such as would be made
by rubbing against other hard pointed fragments of stone.
This is to be explained by the fact that these stones
as they were carried on by the glacier were rubbed on
the floor of rock over which the glacier was slipping.
If their journey was long enough, they stood a chance
of being rubbed away altogether and of finishing their
existence as sand or mud. What the valley did to the
glacier's stones, the stones did to the valley. They
scratched it and scored it. Every promontory of rock
which stood in the path of the ice had its angles and
corners ground away. The polish and the directions of
the scratches are especially remarkable, because, whether
the marks are mere lines or deep-worn ruts, they are
all on smooth surfaces, and they all run one way. That
way is the direction in which the glacier moved. How
high a degree of polish or how deep the markings may
be depends a good deal on the kind of rock over which
the glacier moved. Tough, close-grained rocks, such as
hard limestone, are sometimes polished to look like
marble. But there is a great deal of difference between
the smoothing effected by a river or a torrent and that
<span class="pagenum" id="Page_74">-74-</span>
which is produced by a glacier, because the river tosses the
rocks and stones in all directions, polishes them on every
side, and leaves no distinctive parallel scratches or grooves
on them. That can only be done by glaciers which hold
the rocks, the rubbers and the rubbed, pressed firmly
together and grind them continually in the same way.</p>
<p>These scratchings or striations of rocks, the smoothed
and grooved surfaces, and the deposited boulder-clay and
boulders enable us to trace the march of great ice-sheets
over regions of the earth which are now of totally
different aspect. From this kind of evidence we have
been able to find that the whole of Northern Europe was
once buried under a great expanse of snow and ice. The
sheet was, as we should expect, thickest in the north and
west, and thinned away southward and eastward. Over
Scandinavia it was between 6000 and 7000 feet in
thickness—as we can tell from the scratches on the sides
of the high mountains. Similar marks 3000 feet above
the sea-level in the Scottish Highlands lead us to believe
that over Scotland the glaciers were 5000 feet thick, and
even as far south as the Hartz Mountains in Germany
it could not have been far short of 1500 feet in thickness.
Imagine this great mass of ice ever slowly moving and
ever creeping solemnly down to the sea. By the markings
it left we can trace where the greater glaciers slid grandly
along. In Scandinavia it swept westwards to the Atlantic
and eastwards to the Gulf of Bothnia, then frozen as
solid as the Pole. Southward the ice ground its way
across Denmark to the Low Countries and North Germany.
The Baltic was choked with ice, and so was the
<span class="pagenum" id="Page_75">-75-</span>
North Sea as far south as London. Ice in that day
flowed in glaciers from the British Isles, eastwards from
Scotland into the hollow of the North Sea, and westwards
down all the clefts of the mountains, burying the western
isles and breaking off in icebergs that drifted far into
the Atlantic. Sir Archibald Geikie says that the
western margin of the ice-fields from the south-west of
Ireland to the North Cape of Norway must have presented
a vast wall of ice 1200 to 1500 miles long and
hundreds of feet high—like that great barrier which the
Antarctic explorers tell us frown on the waters that lap
the boundaries of the south polar land. Northern Europe
must have been like North Greenland of to-day. The
rock scratches tell us (since even the southern coast of
Ireland is intensely ice-worn) that the edge of ice must
have extended some distance beyond Cape Clear, rising
out of the sea with a precipitous front that faced to the
south. Thence the ice-cliff swung eastwards, passing
probably along the line of the British Channel and keeping
to the north of the valley of the Thames. Its
southern margin ran across what is now Holland and
skirted the high grounds of Westphalia, Hanover, and the
Hartz Mountains—which probably barred its further
progress southward. "There is evidence that the ice
swept round into the lowlands of Saxony up to the chain
of the Erz, Riesen, and Sudenten Mountains, whence its
southern limit turned eastward across Silesia, Poland, and
Galicia, and then swung round to the north, passing
across Russia by way of Kieff and Nijni Novgorod to the
Arctic Ocean."</p>
<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_76">-76-</span></p>
<p>In North America there are similar traces of the great
ice-sheet, one of the branches of which streamed southward
into the basin of the Mississippi, the second moving westward
from Hudson Bay to the Rockies, and southward to
Iowa, and the third setting out from the great mountain
ranges of British Columbia. Right across North America
to-day for thousands of miles stretch accumulations and
mounds of rock which were pushed forward by the ice, and
were dropped by the glaciers when they reached "farthest
south." These accumulations are called, from their
origin, the great "terminal moraines" of the North
American Ice Age.</p>
<p>It must not be thought that these great ice-sheets of
both hemispheres remained constant in extent and thickness.
There were periods of retreat and advance, of progress
and shrinking, and the shrinkings of these took
place on a large scale, and perhaps lasted for hundreds or
thousands of years; so that mixed with the strata of
boulder-clay, which are the characteristic strata of the
glacial periods, are other strata of sand, ordinary clay,
and even peat. Remains of plants and animals are found
in these strata, showing that sometimes the glaciers
retreated so far and for so long that vegetation sprang
up and animals lived on the ground that they had
covered—in the intervals when the cold of centuries was
replaced by other centuries of mild and equable climate.</p>
<p>At last, after many of these swallow-like retreats and
advances, the warmer climate at length came to stay,
and the ice retreated farther and farther to the north.
It still remained among the mountains, so that we might
<span class="pagenum" id="Page_77">-77-</span>
describe the glaciers of the Alps and of the Canadian
Rockies as the last relics existing to-day of the great Ice
Age of the past. The retreat to the Arctic Circle left
many other relics behind it, the great lakes, for example,
like Winnipeg and Manitoba, and the Great Salt
Lake of Utah. All were once mightier sheets, because
during the Ice Age their waters were held back. Other
smaller lakes formed by the dumping-heaps or terminal
moraines of the glaciers still exist, and are especially
noticeable in Finland. During the later stages of the Ice
Age the level of the land was lower than it is now in
Western Europe. When the ground began to rise—in
slow upheavals with long pauses for rest—it left its impress
in raised beaches, which can be seen on both sides
of Scotland and on the Norwegian coast. The climate
grew gradually milder, the animals and the plants
followed in the train of the retreating ice, and even the
traces of man's existence began to appear. The change
was not sudden; it was so gradual that the Ice Age
slipped as imperceptibly as its own glaciers into the age
in which Man's activities in Europe began.</p>
<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop" />
<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_78">-78-</span></p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />