<h2 id="sigil_toc_id_19">CHAPTER IX.</h2>
<h3 id="sigil_toc_id_20">THE QUESTION OF THE POWDERS.</h3>
<p>There remained for consideration merely the question of powders.
The public awaited with interest its final decision. The size of the
projectile, the length of the cannon being settled, what would be the
quantity of powder necessary to produce impulsion?</p>
<p>It is generally asserted that gunpowder was invented in the
fourteenth century by the monk Schwartz, who paid for his grand
discovery with his life. It is, however, pretty well proved that this
story ought to be ranked amongst the legends of the middle ages.
Gunpowder was not invented by any one; it was the lineal successor of
the Greek fire, which, like itself, was composed of sulphur and
saltpetre. Few persons are acquainted with the mechanical power of
gunpowder. Now this is precisely what is necessary to be understood
in order to comprehend the importance of the question submitted to
the committee.</p>
<p>A litre of gunpowder weighs about 2 lbs.; during combustion it
produces 400 litres of gas. This gas, on being liberated and acted
upon by a temperature raised to 2400 degrees, occupies a space of
4000 litres: consequently the volume of powder is to the volume of
gas produced by its combustion as 1 to 4000. One may judge,
therefore, of the tremendous pressure of this gas when compressed
within a space 4000 times too confined. All this was, of course, well
known to the members of the committee when they met on the following
evening.</p>
<p>The first speaker on this occasion was Major Elphinstone, who had
been the director of the gunpowder factories during the war.</p>
<div class="illus"><ANTIMG alt="Illustration: THE INVENTION OF GUNPOWDER BY THE MONK SCHWARTZ." id="gunpowder" src="images/gunpowder.jpg" /></div>
<div class="caption">THE INVENTION OF GUNPOWDER BY THE MONK
SCHWARTZ.</div>
<p>"Gentlemen," said this distinguished chemist, "I begin with some
figures which will serve as the basis of our calculation. The old
24-pounder shot required for its discharge 16 lbs. of powder."</p>
<p>"You are certain of the amount?" broke in Barbicane.</p>
<p>"Quite certain," replied the major. "The Armstrong cannon employs
only 75 lbs. of powder for a projectile of 800 lbs., and the Rodman
Columbiad uses only 160 lbs. of powder to send its half-ton shot a
distance of six miles. These facts cannot be called in question, for
I myself raised the point during the depositions taken before the
Committee of Artillery."</p>
<p>"Quite true," said the general.</p>
<p>"Well," replied the major, "these figures go to prove that the
quantity of powder is not increased with the weight of the shot; that
is to say, if a 24-pounder shot requires 16 lbs. of powder;—in other
words, if in ordinary guns we employ a quantity of powder equal to
two-thirds of the weight of the projectile, this proportion is not
constant. Calculate, and you will see that in place of 333 lbs. of
powder, the quantity is reduced to no more than 160 lbs."</p>
<p>"What are you aiming at?" asked the president.</p>
<p>"If you push your theory to extremes, my dear major," said J. T.
Maston, "you will get to this, that as soon as your shot becomes
sufficiently heavy you will not require any powder at all."</p>
<p>"Our friend Maston is always at his jokes, even in serious
matters," cried the major; "but let him make his mind easy, I am
going presently to propose gunpowder enough to satisfy his
artillerist's propensities. I only keep to statistical facts when I
say that during the war, and for the very largest guns, the weight of
powder was reduced, as the result of experience, to a tenth part of
the weight of the shot."</p>
<p>"Perfectly correct," said Morgan; "but before deciding the
quantity of powder necessary to give the impulse, I think it would be
as well—"</p>
<p>"We shall have to employ a large-grained powder," continued the
major, "its combustion is more rapid than that of the small."</p>
<p>"No doubt about that," replied Morgan, "but it is very
destructive, and ends by enlarging the bore of the pieces."</p>
<p>"Granted; but that which is injurious to a gun destined to perform
long service is not so to our Columbiad. We shall run no danger of an
explosion; and it is necessary that our powder should take fire
instantaneously in order that its mechanical effect may be
complete."</p>
<p>"We must have," said Maston, "several touch-holes, so as to fire
it at different points at the same time."</p>
<p>"Certainly," replied Elphinstone; "but that will render the
working of the piece more difficult. I return then to my
large-grained powder, which removes those difficulties. In his
Columbiad charges Rodman employed a powder as large as chestnuts,
made of willow charcoal, simply dried in cast-iron pans. This powder
was hard and glittering, left no trace upon the hand, contained
hydrogen and oxygen in large proportion, took fire instantaneously,
and, though very destructive, did not sensibly injure the
mouth-piece."</p>
<p>Up to this point Barbicane had kept aloof from the discussion; he
left the others to speak while he himself listened; he had evidently
got an idea. He now simply said, "Well, my friends, what quantity of
powder do you propose?"</p>
<p>The three members look at one another.</p>
<p>"Two hundred thousand pounds," at last said Morgan.</p>
<p>"Five hundred thousand," added the major.</p>
<p>"Eight hundred thousand," screamed Maston.</p>
<p>A moment of silence followed this triple proposal; it was at last
broken by the president.</p>
<p>"Gentlemen," he quietly said, "I start from this principle, that
the resistance of a gun, constructed under the given conditions, is
unlimited. I shall surprise our friend Maston, then, by stigmatizing
his calculations as timid; and I propose to double his 800,000 lbs.
of powder."</p>
<p>"Sixteen hundred thousand pounds?" shouted Maston, leaping from
his seat.</p>
<p>"Just so."</p>
<p>"We shall have to come then to my ideal of a cannon half a mile
long; for you see 1,600,000 lbs. will occupy a space of about 20,000
cubic feet; and since the contents of your cannon do not exceed
54,000 cubic feet, it would be half full; and the bore will not be
more than long enough for the gas to communicate to the projectile
sufficient impulse."</p>
<p>"Nevertheless," said the president, "I hold to that quantity of
powder. Now, 1,600,000 lbs. of powder will create 6,000,000,000 of
litres of gas. Six thousand millions! You quite understand?"</p>
<p>"What is to be done then?" said the general.</p>
<p>"The thing is very simple; we must reduce this enormous quantity
of powder, while preserving to it its mechanical power."</p>
<p>"Good; but by what means?"</p>
<p>"I am going to tell you," replied Barbicane quietly. "Nothing is
more easy than to reduce this mass to one quarter of its bulk. You
know that curious cellular matter which constitutes the elementary
tissues of vegetables? This substance is found quite pure in many
bodies, especially in cotton, which is nothing more than the down of
the seeds of the cotton plant. Now cotton, combined with cold nitric
acid, becomes transformed into a substance eminently insoluble,
combustible, and explosive. It was first discovered in 1832, by
Braconnot, a French chemist, who called it xyloidine. In 1838 another
Frenchman, Pelouze, investigated its different properties, and
finally, in 1846, Schonbein, Professor of Chemistry at Bâle, proposed
its employment for purposes of war. This powder, now called pyroxyle,
or fulminating cotton, is prepared with great facility by simply
plunging cotton for fifteen minutes in nitric acid, then washing it
in water, then drying it, and it is ready for use."</p>
<p>"Nothing could be more simple," said Morgan.</p>
<p>"Moreover, pyroxyle is unaltered by moisture—a valuable property
to us, inasmuch as it would take several days to charge the cannon.
It ignites at 170 degrees in place of 240, and its combustion is so
rapid that one may set light to it on the top of ordinary powder,
without the latter having time to ignite."</p>
<p>"Perfect!" exclaimed the major.</p>
<p>"Only it is more expensive."</p>
<p>"What matter?" cried J. T. Maston.</p>
<p>"Finally, it imparts to projectiles a velocity four times superior
to that of gunpowder. I will even add, that if we mix with it
one-eighth of its own weight of nitrate of potass, its expansive
force is again considerably augmented."</p>
<p>"Will that be necessary?" asked the major.</p>
<p>"I think not," replied Barbicane. "So, then, in place of 1,600,000
lbs. of powder, we shall have but 400,000 lbs. of fulminating cotton;
and since we can, without danger, compress 500 lbs. of cotton into 27
cubic feet, the whole quantity will not occupy a height of more than
180 feet within the bore of the Columbiad. In this way the shot will
have more than 700 feet of bore to traverse under a force of
6,000,000,000 litres of gas before taking its flight towards the
moon."</p>
<p>At this junction J. T. Maston could not repress his emotion; he
flung himself into the arms of his friend with the violence of a
projectile, and Barbicane would have been stove in if he had not been
bomb-proof.</p>
<p>This incident terminated the third meeting of the Committee.</p>
<p>Barbicane and his bold colleagues, to whom nothing seemed
impossible, had succeeded in solving the complex problems of
projectile, cannon, and powder. Their plan was drawn up, and it only
remained to put it in execution.</p>
<p>"A mere matter of detail, a bagatelle," said J. T. Maston.</p>
<div class="illus"><ANTIMG alt="Illustration: CAPTAIN NICHOLL" id="nicholl" src="images/nicholl.jpg" /></div>
<div class="caption">CAPTAIN NICHOLL</div>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />