<h2 id="sigil_toc_id_15">CHAPTER VII.</h2>
<h3 id="sigil_toc_id_16">THE HYMN OF THE CANNON-BALL.</h3>
<p>The Observatory of Cambridge in its memorable letter had treated
the question from a purely astronomical point of view. The mechanical
part still remained.</p>
<p>President Barbicane had, without loss of time, nominated a Working
Committee of the Gun Club. The duty of this Committee was to resolve
the three grand questions of the cannon, the projectile, and the
powder. It was composed of four members of great technical knowledge,
Barbicane (with a casting vote in case of equality), General Morgan,
Major Elphinstone, and J. T. Maston, to whom were confided the
functions of secretary. On the 8th of October the Committee met at
the house of President Barbicane, 3, Republican Street. The meeting
was opened by the president himself.</p>
<p>"Gentlemen," said he, "we have to resolve one of the most
important problems in the whole of the noble science of gunnery. It
might appear, perhaps, the most logical course to devote our first
meeting to the discussion of the engine to be employed. Nevertheless,
after mature consideration, it has appeared to me that the question
of the projectile must take precedence of that of the cannon, and
that the dimensions of the latter must necessarily depend upon those
of the former."</p>
<p>"Suffer me to say a word," here broke in J. T. Maston. Permission
having been granted, "Gentlemen," said he, with an inspired accent,
"our president is right in placing the question of the projectile
above all others. The ball we are about to discharge at the moon is
our ambassador to her, and I wish to consider it from a moral point
of view. The cannon-ball, gentlemen, to my mind, is the most
magnificent manifestation of human power. If Providence has created
the stars and the planets, man has called the cannon-ball into
existence. Let Providence claim the swiftness of electricity and of
light, of the stars, the comets, and the planets, of wind and
sound—we claim to have invented the swiftness of the cannon-ball, a
hundred times superior to that of the swiftest horses or railway
train. How glorious will be the moment when, infinitely exceeding all
hitherto attained velocities, we shall launch our new projectile with
the rapidity of seven miles a second! Shall it not, gentlemen—shall
it not be received up there with the honours due to a terrestrial
ambassador?"</p>
<p>Overcome with emotion the orator sat down and applied himself to a
huge plate of sandwiches before him.</p>
<p>"And now," said Barbicane, "let us quit the domain of poetry and
come direct to the question."</p>
<p>"By all means," replied the members, each with his mouth full of
sandwich.</p>
<p>"The problem before us," continued the president, "is how to
communicate to a projectile a velocity of 12,000 yards per second.
Let us at present examine the velocities hitherto attained. General
Morgan will be able to enlighten us on this point."</p>
<p>"And the more easily," replied the general, "that during the war I
was a member of the Committee of experiments. I may say, then, that
the 100-pounder Dahlgrens, which carried a distance of 5000 yards,
impressed upon their projectile an initial velocity of 500 yards a
second. The Rodman Columbiad threw a shot weighing half a ton a
distance of six miles, with a velocity of 800 yards per second—a
result which Armstrong and Palisser have never obtained in
England."</p>
<p>"This," replied Barbicane, "is, I believe, the maximum velocity
ever attained?"</p>
<p>"It is so," replied the general.</p>
<div class="illus"><ANTIMG alt="Illustration: THE RODMAN COLUMBIAD." id="columbiad" src="images/columbiad.jpg" /></div>
<div class="caption">THE RODMAN COLUMBIAD.</div>
<p>"Ah!" groaned J. T. Maston, "if my mortar had not burst—"</p>
<p>"Yes," quietly replied Barbicane, "but it did burst. We must take,
then, for our starting-point this velocity of 800 yards. We must
increase it twenty-fold. Now, reserving for another discussion the
means of producing this velocity, I will call your attention to the
dimensions which it will be proper to assign to the shot. You
understand that we have nothing to do here with projectiles weighing
at most but half a ton."</p>
<p>"Why not?" demanded the major.</p>
<p>"Because the shot," quickly replied J. T. Maston, "must be big
enough to attract the attention of the inhabitants of the moon, if
there are any?"</p>
<p>"Yes," replied Barbicane, "and for another reason more important
still."</p>
<p>"What mean you?" asked the major.</p>
<p>"I mean that it is not enough to discharge a projectile, and then
take no further notice of it; we must follow it throughout its
course, up to the moment when it shall reach its goal."</p>
<p>"What?" shouted the general and the major in great surprise.</p>
<p>"Undoubtedly," replied Barbicane composedly, "or our experiment
would produce no result."</p>
<p>"But then," replied the major, "you will have to give this
projectile enormous dimensions."</p>
<p>"No! Be so good as to listen. You know that optical instruments
have acquired great perfection; with certain telescopes we have
succeeded in obtaining enlargements of 6000 times and reducing the
moon to within forty miles' distance. Now, at this distance, any
objects sixty feet square would be perfectly visible. If, then, the
penetrative power of telescopes has not been further increased, it is
because that power detracts from their light; and the moon, which is
but a reflecting mirror, does not give back sufficient light to
enable us to perceive objects of lesser magnitude."</p>
<p>"Well, then, what do you propose to do?" asked the general. "Would
you give your projectile a diameter of sixty feet?"</p>
<p>"Not so."</p>
<p>"Do you intend, then, to increase the luminous power of the
moon?"</p>
<p>"Exactly so. If I can succeed in diminishing the density of the
atmosphere through which the moon's light has to travel I shall have
rendered her light more intense. To effect that object it will be
enough to establish a telescope on some elevated mountain. That is
what we will do."</p>
<p>"I give it up," answered the major. "You have such a way of
simplifying things. And what enlargement do you expect to obtain in
this way?"</p>
<p>"One of 48,000 times, which should bring the moon within an
apparent distance of five miles; and, in order to be visible, objects
need not have a diameter of more than nine feet."</p>
<p>"So, then," cried J. T. Maston, "our projectile need not be more
than nine feet in diameter."</p>
<p>"Let me observe, however," interrupted Major Elphinstone, "this
will involve a weight such as—"</p>
<p>"My dear major," replied Barbicane, "before discussing its weight,
permit me to enumerate some of the marvels which our ancestors have
achieved in this respect. I don't mean to pretend that the science of
gunnery has not advanced, but it is as well to bear in mind that
during the middle ages they obtained results more surprising, I will
venture to say, than ours. For instance, during the siege of
Constantinople by Mahomet II., in 1453, stone shot of 1900 lbs.
weight were employed. At Malta, in the time of the knights, there was
a gun of the fortress of St. Elmo which threw a projectile weighing
2500 lbs. And, now, what is the extent of what we have seen
ourselves? Armstrong guns discharging shot of 500 lbs., and the
Rodman guns projectiles of half a ton! It seems, then, that if
projectiles have gained in range, they have lost far more in weight.
Now, if we turn our efforts in that direction, we ought to arrive,
with the progress of science, at ten times the weight of the shot of
Mahomet II. and the Knights of Malta."</p>
<div class="illus"><ANTIMG alt="Illustration: CANNON AT MALTA IN THE TIME OF THE KNIGHTS." id="malta" src="images/malta.jpg" /></div>
<div class="caption">CANNON AT MALTA IN THE TIME OF THE
KNIGHTS.</div>
<p>"Clearly," replied the major; "but what metal do you calculate
upon employing?"</p>
<p>"Simply cast iron," said General Morgan.</p>
<p>"But," interrupted the major, "since the weight of a shot is
proportionate to its volume, an iron ball of nine feet in diameter
would be of tremendous weight."</p>
<p>"Yes, if it were solid, not if it were hollow."</p>
<p>"Hollow? then it would be a shell?"</p>
<p>"Yes, a shell," replied Barbicane; "decidedly it must be. A solid
shot of 108 inches would weigh more than 200,000 lbs., a weight
evidently far too great. Still, as we must reserve a certain
stability for our projectile, I propose to give it a weight of 20,000
lbs."</p>
<p>"What, then, will be the thickness of the sides?" asked the
major.</p>
<p>"If we follow the usual proportion," replied Morgan, "a diameter
of 108 inches would require sides of two feet thickness, or
less."</p>
<p>"That would be too much," replied Barbicane; "for you will observe
that the question is not that of a shot intended to pierce an iron
plate: it will suffice, therefore, to give it sides strong enough to
resist the pressure of the gas. The problem, therefore, is this—What
thickness ought a cast-iron shell to have in order not to weigh more
than 20,000 lbs.? Our clever secretary will soon enlighten us upon
this point."</p>
<p>"Nothing easier," replied the worthy secretary of the Committee;
and, rapidly tracing a few algebraical formulæ upon paper, among
which <i>n</i>² and <i>x</i>² frequently appeared, he presently
said,—</p>
<p>"The sides will require a thickness of less than two inches."</p>
<p>"Will that be enough?" asked the major doubtfully.</p>
<p>"Clearly not!" replied the president.</p>
<p>"What is to be done, then?" said Elphinstone, with a puzzled
air.</p>
<p>"Employ another metal instead of iron."</p>
<p>"Copper?" said Morgan.</p>
<p>"No; that would be too heavy. I have better than that to
offer."</p>
<p>"What then?" asked the major.</p>
<p>"Aluminium!" replied Barbicane.</p>
<p>"Aluminium?" cried his three colleagues in chorus.</p>
<p>"Unquestionably, my friends. This valuable metal possesses the
whiteness of silver, the indestructibility of gold, the tenacity of
iron, the fusibility of copper, the lightness of glass. It is easily
wrought, is very widely distributed, forming the base of most of the
rocks, is three times lighter than iron, and seems to have been
created for the express purpose of furnishing us with the material
for our projectile."</p>
<p>"But, my dear president," said the major, "is not the cost price
of aluminium extremely high?"</p>
<p>"It was so at its first discovery, but it has fallen now to nine
dollars the pound."</p>
<p>"But still, nine dollars the pound!" replied the major, who was
not willing readily to give in; "even that is an enormous price."</p>
<p>"Undoubtedly, my dear major; but not beyond our reach."</p>
<p>"What will the projectile weigh then?" asked Morgan.</p>
<p>"Here is the result of my calculations," replied Barbicane. "A
shot of 108 inches in diameter, and 12 inches in thickness, would
weigh, in cast-iron, 67,440 lbs.; cast in aluminium, its weight will
be reduced to 19,250 lbs."</p>
<p>"Capital!" cried the major; "but do you know that, at nine dollars
the pound, this projectile will cost—"</p>
<p>"One hundred and seventy-three thousand and fifty dollars
($173,050). I know it quite well. But fear not, my friends; the money
will not be wanting for our enterprise, I will answer for it. Now
what say you to aluminium, gentlemen?"</p>
<p>"Adopted!" replied the three members of the Committee. So ended
the first meeting. The question of the projectile was definitively
settled.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />