<p><SPAN name="link2H_4_0031" id="link2H_4_0031"></SPAN></p>
<br/>
<h2> BLESSED BE YE POOR. </h2>
<p>A leading London newspaper, the <i>Daily Chronicle</i>, has recently
opened it columns to a discussion of the question, "Is Christianity Played
Out?" Mr. Robert Buchanan thinks that it is, and we are of the same
opinion. But in a certain sense Christianity is <i>not</i> played out. To
use a common expression, "there's money in it." That is incontestable.
Despite the "poverty" of the "lower clergy," for whom so many appeals are
made, the clerical business beats all others, if we compare the amount of
investment with the size of the dividend. Relatively speaking, the profits
are magnificent. There are curates with only a workman's wages, and of
course they merit our deepest sympathy. It is quite shocking to think that
a disciple of the "<i>poor</i> Carpenter of Nazareth" has to subsist, and
support his ten children, on such a miserable pittance. It is a calamity
which calls for tears of blood. But, on the other hand, there are
Archbishops with princely incomes, Bishops with lordly revenues, Deans and
Canons with fine salaries and snug quarters; and between the two extremes
of the fat bishop and the lean curate is a long line of gradations, in
which, if we strike an average, the result is very far from despicable. It
may be added that while the leading Nonconformist ministers, at least in
England, do not rival the great Church dignitaries in the matter of
income, they often run up to a thousand a year and sometimes over it.
Taking the average of their incomes, we have no hesitation in saying it is
beyond what they would earn in the ordinary labor market. Still, so far as
they are not paid by the State, as the Church clergy <i>are</i>, we have
no personal reason for complaint. This is a free country—especially
for Christians; and if the lay disciples of the poor Carpenter like to pay
his professional apostles a fancy price for their work, it is no concern
of ours from a business point of view. Nevertheless, as the said apostles
are <i>public</i> men, who set up as other people's <i>teachers</i>, we
have a right to express an opinion as to the consistency between their
preaching and their practice.</p>
<p>Our gallant colleague, Joseph Symes, who is nobly upholding the
Freethought banner in Australia, once asked, "Who's to be Damned if
Christianity is True?" Certainly, he said, the clergy stand a fine chance.
They are more likely to go to Hades than the congregations they preach to.
On on average they are better off. They preach, or <i>should</i> preach,
the blessings of poverty, and the curse, nay, the damnableness, of wealth.
According to the teaching of Jesus, as we read it in the Sermon on the
Mount, and as we find it illustrated in the parable of Dives and Lazarus,
every pauper is pretty sure of a front seat in heaven; and every man of
property or good income is equally sure of warm quarters in hell. But you
do not meet parsons in workhouses, though some of them get a good deal of
outdoor relief. Go into a country parish and look for the clergyman's
house; you will not find it difficult to discover. The best residence is
the squire's, the next best is the parson's. Everywhere the clericals
appropriate as much as they can of the good things of this world. They
find it quite easy to worship God and Mammon together. The curate has his
eye on a vicarage; the vicar has his on a deanery; the dean has his on a
bishopric. The Dissenting minister is open to improve his position.
Sometimes he is invited to another church. He wrestles with the Lord, and
makes inquiries. If they prove satisfactory, he recognises "a call." Other
people, in ordinary business, would honestly say they were accepting a
better situation; but the man of God is above all that, so he obeys the
Lord's voice and goes to a position of "greater service," though it would
puzzle him to show an extra soul saved by the exchange. Yes, the poor
Carpenter's apostles strive to make the best of this world, and take their
chance of the next. They are wise in their generation; they resemble the
serpent in the text, however they neglect the dove. And for all these
things God shall bring them into account—that is, if the gospel be
true; for nothing is more certain, according to the gospel, than that the
poor will be saved, and those who are not poor will be damned.</p>
<p>Benjamin Disraeli called the Conservative government of Sir Robert Peel
"an organised hypocrisy." Modern Christianity appears to us to merit the
same description. The note of modern apologetics is the phrase of
"Christ-like." In one respect the gentlemen who strike this note <i>are</i>
Christ-like. They live on the gifts of the faithful, including those of
"rich women." But the likeness ends there. In other respects they are
dissimilar to their Master. He <i>died</i> upon the cross, and they <i>live</i>
upon the cross. Yes, and many of them get far more on the cross than they
would ever get on the square.</p>
<p>Doubtless we shall be censured in vigorous biblical language for speaking
so plainly. But we mean every word we say, and are prepared to make it
good in discussion. Men should practise what they preach. Those who teach
that poverty is a blessing should themselves be poor. Those who teach that
God Almighty cried "Woe unto you rich!" should avoid the curse of wealth.
If they do not, they are hypocrites. It is no use mincing the matter.
Plain speech is best on such occasions. When the great Dr. Abernethy told
a gouty, dyspeptic, rich patient to "live on sixpence a day and earn it,"
his advice was more wholesome than the most dexterous rigmarole.</p>
<p>Nothing could better show than the conduct of the clergy that Christianity
<i>is</i> played out, if it means the teaching of the Sermon on the Mount.
Those who preach it cannot practise it; what is more, they do not mean to.
The late Archbishop of York, while Bishop of Peterborough, wrote a
magazine article on this Sermon on the Mount, in which he urged that any
Society that was based upon it would go to ruin in a week. He was paid at
that time £4,500 a year to-preach this Sermon on the Mount, and he did so—in
the pulpit; then he mounted another rostrum, and cried, "For God's sake
don't practise it."</p>
<p>"Blessed be ye poor" and "Woe unto you rich" are texts with which the
Church has bamboozled the multitude in the interest of the privileged
classes. The disinherited sons of earth were promised all sorts of fine
compensations in Kingdom-Come; meanwhile kings, aristocrats, priests, and
all the rest of the juggling and appropriating tribe, battened on the
fruits of other men's labor. The poor were like the dog crossing the
stream, and seeing the big shadow of his piece of meat in the water.
"Seize the shadow!" the priests cried. The poor did so. But the
substance-was not lost. It was snapped up and shared by priestcraft and
privilege.</p>
<p>The people have been told that the gospel is a cheap thing—without
money and without price. That is the prospectus. But the gospel is
frightfully dear in reality. Religion costs more than education. England
spends more in preparing her sons and daughters for the next world than in
training them for this world. Yet the next world may be nothing but a
dream, and certainly we <i>know</i> nothing about it; while this world is
a solid and often a solemn fact, with its business as well as its
pleasures, its work as well as its enjoyments, its duties as well as its
privileges. To keep people out of hell, and guide them to heaven (places
that only exist in the map of faith), we spend over twenty millions a
year. This is a sum which, if wisely devoted, would remedy the worst evils
of human society in a single generation. It would found countless
institutions of culture and innocent recreation; and, by means of
experiments, it would solve a host of social problems. Instead of doing
this, we keep up a huge army of black-coats to fight an imaginary Devil;
yet we call ourselves a <i>practical</i> people. Christianity has it
roots-deep down in the <i>wealth</i> of England, and this is the secret of
its power, allied of course with its usurped authority over the minds of
little children. The-churches and chapels are mostly social institutions,
Sunday resorts of the "respectable" classes. For any purpose connected
with the real welfare of the people Christianity might just as well be
dead and buried—as it will be when the people see the truth.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />