<h2><SPAN name="XVIII" id="XVIII"></SPAN>XVIII</h2>
<h3>A BOTANOPHILIST'S JOURNAL</h3>
<blockquote><p>He was the attorney of the indigenous plants, and owned to a
preference of the weeds to the imported plants, as of the Indian to
the civilized man.—<span class="smcap">Emerson</span>. </p>
</blockquote>
<p><span class="smcap">I have</span> referred several times to Henry Thoreau, of Concord, in whose
<i>Journal</i> a great deal is said about wildflowers; and as the volumes are
not easily accessible to English readers it may be worth while to select
therefrom a few of the more interesting passages. In all that he wrote
on the subject Thoreau appears less as the botanist than the
flower-lover; indeed, he expressly observes that he himself comes under
the head of the "Botanophilists," as Linnæus termed them; viz. those who
record various facts about flowers, but not from a strictly scientific
standpoint. "I never studied botany," he said, "and do not to-day,
systematically; the most natural system is so artificial. I wanted to
know my neighbours, if possible; to get a little nearer to them." So
great was his zest in cultivating this floral acquaintance that, as he
tells us, he often visited a plant four or five miles from Concord<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_134" id="Page_134">[Pg 134]</SPAN></span> half
a dozen times within a fortnight, in order to note its time of
flowering.</p>
<p>Books he found, in general, unsatisfactory. "I asked a learned and
accurate naturalist," he says, "who is at the same time the courteous
guardian of a public library, to direct me to those works which
contained the more particular popular account, or <i>biography</i>, of
particular flowers—for I had trusted that each flower had had many
lovers and faithful describers in past times—but he informed me that I
had read all; that no one was acquainted with them, they were only
catalogued like his books." It was the human aspect of the flower that
Thoreau craved; and he was therefore disappointed when he saw "pages
about some fair flower's qualities as food or medicine, but perhaps not
a sentence about its significance to the eye; as if the cowslip were
better for 'greens' than for yellows." Thus he complained that botanies
are "the prose of flowers," instead of what they ought to be, the
poetry. He made an exception, however, in favour of old Gerarde's
<i>Herball</i>.</p>
<blockquote><p>His admirable though quaint descriptions are, to my mind, greatly
superior to the modern more scientific ones. He describes not
according to rule, but to his natural delight in the plants. He
brings them vividly before you, as one who has seen and delighted
in them. It is almost as good as to see the plants themselves. His
leaves are leaves; his flowers, flowers; his fruit, fruit. They are
green, and coloured, and fragrant. It is a man's knowledge added to
a child's delight. . . . How much better to describe your<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_135" id="Page_135">[Pg 135]</SPAN></span> object
in fresh English words rather than in these conventional
Latinisms!" </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Linnæus, too, "the man of flowers," as he calls him, is praised by
Thoreau. "If you would read books on botany, go to the fathers of the
science. Read Linnæus at once, and come down from him as far as you
please. I lost much time in reading the florists. It is remarkable how
little the mass of those interested in botany are acquainted with
Linnæus."</p>
<p>Thoreau's manner of botanizing was, like most of his habits, somewhat
singular. His vasculum was his straw-hat. "I never used any other," he
writes, "and when some whom I visited were evidently surprised at its
dilapidated look, as I deposited it on their front entry-table, I
assured them it was not so much my hat as my botany-box." With this
vasculum he professed himself more than content.</p>
<blockquote><p>I am inclined to think that my hat, whose lining is gathered in
midway so as to make a shelf, is about as good a botany-box as I
could have; and there is something in the darkness and the vapours
that arise from the head—at least, if you take a bath—which
preserves flowers through a long walk. Flowers will frequently come
fresh out of this botany-box at the end of the day, though they
have had no sprinkling. </p>
</blockquote>
<p>The joy of meeting with a new plant, a sensation known to all searchers
after flowers, is more than once mentioned in the <i>Journal</i>: the
discovery of a single flower hitherto unknown to him makes him feel as
if he were in a wealth of novelties. "By<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_136" id="Page_136">[Pg 136]</SPAN></span> the discovery of one new plant
all bounds seem to be infinitely removed." He notes, too, the not
uncommon experience, that a flower, once recognized, is likely soon to
be re-encountered. Seeing something blue, or glaucous, in a swamp, he
approaches it, and finds it to be the <i>Andromeda polifolia</i>, which had
been shown him, only a few days before, in Emerson's collection; now he
sees it in abundance. At times he adopts the method of sitting quietly
and looking around him, on the principle that "as it is best to sit in a
grove and let the birds come to you, so, as it were, even the flowers
will come."</p>
<p>Swamps were among Thoreau's favourite haunts: he thinks it would be a
luxury to stand in one, up to his chin, for a whole summer's day,
scenting the sweet-fern and bilberries. "That is a glorious swamp of
Miles's," he remarks; "the more open parts, where the dwarf andromeda
prevails. . . . These are the wildest and richest gardens that we have."
The fields were less trustworthy, because of the annual vandalism of the
mowing. "About these times," he writes in June, "some hundreds of men,
with freshly sharpened scythes, make an irruption into my garden when in
its rankest condition, and clip my herbs all as close as they can; and I
am restricted to the rough hedges and worn-out fields which had little
to attract them."</p>
<p>Among Thoreau's best-beloved flowers, if we may judge by certain
passages of the <i>Journal</i>, was the large white bindweed (<i>convolvulus
sepium</i>), or<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_137" id="Page_137">[Pg 137]</SPAN></span> "morning-glory." "It always refreshes me to see it," he
writes; "I associate it with holiest morning hours. It may preside over
my morning walks and thoughts." Not less worthily celebrated by him, in
another mood, are the wild rose and the water-lily.</p>
<blockquote><p>We now have roses on the land and lilies on the water—both land
and water have done their best—now, just after the longest day.
Nature says, "You behold the utmost I can do." The red rose, with
the intense colour of many suns concentrated, spreads its tender
petals perfectly fair, its flower not to be overlooked, modest yet
queenly, on the edges of shady copses and meadows.... And the
water-lily floats on the smooth surface of slow waters, amid
rounded shields of leaves, bucklers, red beneath, which simulate a
green field, perfuming the air. The highest, intensest colour
belongs to the land; the purest, perchance, to the water. </p>
</blockquote>
<p>It was not Thoreau's practice to pluck many flowers; he preferred, as a
rule, to leave them where they were; but he speaks of the fitness of
having "in a vase of water on your table the wildflowers of the season
which are just blossoming": thus in mid-June he brings home some
rosebuds ready to expand, "and the next morning they open and fill my
chamber with fragrance." At another time the grateful thought of the
calamint's scent suffices him: "I need not smell it; it is a balm to my
mind to remember its fragrance."</p>
<p>It was characteristic of Thoreau that he loved to renew his outdoor
pleasures in remembrance, by pondering over the beautiful things he had
witnessed, whether through sight or sound or scent. His mountain
excursions were not fully apprehended<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_138" id="Page_138">[Pg 138]</SPAN></span> by him, until he had afterwards
meditated on them. "It is after we get home," he says, "that we really
go over the mountain, if ever. What did the mountain say? What did the
mountain do?" So it was with his flowers: even in the long winter
evenings they were still his companions and friends.</p>
<p><span style="margin-left: 2em;">I have remembered, when the winter came,</span><br/>
<span style="margin-left: 2em;">High in my chamber in the frosty nights,</span></p>
<hr style="width: 15%; Margin-left: 3em; Margin-top: 1em; margin-bottom: 1em;" />
<p><span style="margin-left: 2em;">How, in the shimmering noon of summer past,</span><br/>
<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Some unrecorded beam slanted across</span><br/>
<span style="margin-left: 2em;">The upland pastures where the johnswort grew.</span><br/></p>
<p>On a January date we find him writing in his <i>Journal</i>: "Perhaps what
most moves us in winter is some reminiscence of far-off summer. How we
leap by the side of the open brooks! What life, what society! The cold
is merely superficial; it is summer still at the core." Thus, by memory,
his winters were turned into summers, and his flower-seasons were
continuous.<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_139" id="Page_139">[Pg 139]</SPAN></span></p>
<hr style="width: 65%;" />
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />