<p><SPAN name="link2H_4_0025" id="link2H_4_0025"></SPAN></p>
<br/>
<h2> WHO ARE THE BLASPHEMERS? </h2>
<p>Atheists are often charged with blasphemy, but it is a crime they cannot
commit. God is to them merely a word, expressing all sorts of ideas, and
not a person. It is, properly speaking, a general term, which includes all
that there is in common among the various deities of the world. The idea
of the supernatural embodies itself in a thousand ways. Truth is always
simple and the same, but error is infinitely diverse. Jupiter, Jehovah,
and Mumbo-Jumbo are alike creations of human fancy, the products of
ignorance and wonder. Which is <i>the</i> God is not yet settled. When the
sects have decided this point, the question may take a fresh turn; but
until then <i>god</i> must be considered as a generic term, like <i>tree</i>
or <i>horse or man</i>; with just this difference, however, that while the
words tree, horse, and man express the general qualities of visible
objects, the word god expresses only the imagined qualities of something
that nobody has ever seen.</p>
<p>When the Atheist examines, denounces, or satirises the gods, he is not
dealing with persons but with ideas. He is incapable of insulting God, for
he does not admit the existence of any such being.</p>
<p>Ideas of god may be good or bad, beautiful or ugly; and according as he
finds them the Atheist treats them. If we lived in Turkey, we should deal
with the god of the Koran; but as we live in England, we deal with the god
of the Bible. We speak of that god as a being, just for convenience sake,
and not from conviction. At bottom, we admit nothing but the mass of
contradictory notions between Genesis and Revelation. We attack not a
person but a belief, not a being but an idea, not a fact but a fancy.</p>
<p>Lord Brougham long ago pointed out, in his <i>Life of Voltaire</i>, that
the great French heretic was not guilty of blasphemy, as his enemies
alleged; since he had no belief in the actual existence of tne god he
dissected, analysed, and laughed at. Mr. Ruskin very eloquently defends
Byron from the same charge. In <i>Cain</i> and elsewhere, the great poet
does not impeach God; he merely impeaches the orthodox creed. We may sum
up the whole matter briefly. No man satirises the god he believes in, and
no man believes in the god he satirises.</p>
<p>We shall not, therefore, be deterred by the cry of "blasphemy!" which is
exactly what the Jewish priests shouted against Jesus Christ. If there is
a God, he cannot be half such a fool and blackguard as the Bible declares.
In destroying the counterfeit we do not harm the reality. And as it is
better, in the words of Plutarch, to have no notion of the gods than to
have notions which dishonor them, we are satisfied that the Lord (if he
exist) will never burn us in hell for denying a few lies told in his name.</p>
<p>The real blasphemers are those who believe in God and blacken his
character; who credit him with less knowledge than a child, and less
intelligence than an idiot; who make him quibble, deceive, and lie; who
represent him as indecent, cruel, and revengeful; who give him the heart
of a savage and the brain of a fool. These are the blasphemers.</p>
<p>When the priest steps between husband and wife, with the name of God on
his lips, he blasphemes. When, in the name of God, he resists education
and science, he blasphemes. When, in the name of God, he opposes freedom
of thought and liberty of conscience, he blasphemes. When, in the name of
God, he robs, tortures, and kills those who differ from him, he
blasphemes. When, in the name of God, he opposes the equal rights of all,
he blasphemes. When, in the name of God, he preaches content to the poor
and oppressed, flatters the rich and powerful, and makes religious tyranny
the handmaiden of political privilege, he blasphemes. And when he takes
the Bible in his hand, and says it was written by the inspiration of God,
he blasphemes almost beyond forgiveness.</p>
<p>Who are the blasphemers? Not we who preach freedom and progress for all
men; but those who try to bind the world with chains of dogma, to burden
it, in God's name, with all the foul superstitions of its ignorant past.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />