<h2><SPAN name="CHAPTER_XVII" id="CHAPTER_XVII"></SPAN>CHAPTER XVII</h2>
<h2>CREATIVE INVOLUTION</h2>
<p>Israel Zangwill, in the papers he contributed
once upon a time to the <i>Strand Magazine</i>
and later reunited in a book bearing the happy
title Without Prejudice, spoke of women writers
as being significant chiefly in their self-revelation.
What they tell of themselves is of more
value than what they write about. Whether
Mr. Zangwill now believes this matters little
in the discussion of an unusual book by a woman.
Perhaps to-day he would open both eyes widely
after reading Creative Involution, by Cora L.
Williams, M. S., with an apposite introduction
by Edwin Markham. Miss Williams deals
with no less a bagatelle than the Fourth Dimension
of Space (what we do not know we
fear, and fear is always capitalised). Speculative
as is her work, she is not a New-Thoughter,
a Christian Scientist, or a member of any of
the other queer rag-tag and bobtail beliefs and
superstitions—fortune-telling, astrology, selling
"futures" in the next life, table-rapping, and
such like. Cora Lenore Williams is an authority
in mathematics, as was the brilliant, unhappy
Sonya Kovalevska. Her ideas, then,
are not verbal wind-pudding, but have a basis
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_196" id="Page_196">[Pg 196]</SPAN></span>
of mathematics and the investigations of the
laboratory, where "chemists and physicists are
finding that the conduct of certain molecules
and crystals is best explained as a fourth-dimensional
activity."</p>
<p>We have always enjoyed the idea of the
Fourth Spatial Dimension. The fact that it
is an <i>x</i> in the plotting of mathematicians in
general does not hinder it from being a fascinating
theme. J. K. F. Zoellner, of Leipsic, proved
to his own satisfaction the existence of a Fourth
Dimension when he turned an india-rubber
ball inside out without tearing it. Later he
became a victim to incurable melancholy.
No wonder. If you have read Cayley, or Abbot's
Flatland, or the ingenious speculations
of Simon Newcomb and W. K. Clifford, you
will learn the attractions of the subject. Perpetual
motion, squaring the circle, are only
variants of the alchemical pursuit of the philosopher's
stone, the transmutation of the baser
metals, the cabalistic Abracadabra, the quest
of the absolute. Man can't live on machinery
alone, and the underfed soul of the past period
of positivism craves more spiritual nourishment
to-day. Hasn't the remarkable mathematician
Henri Poincaré (author of Science and Hypothesis,
The Value of Science, Science and
Method) declared that between the construction
of the spirit and the absolute of truth there
is an abysm caused by free choice and the
voluntary elimination which have necessitated
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_197" id="Page_197">[Pg 197]</SPAN></span>
such inferences? Note the word "free"; free-will
is restored to its old and honourable estate
in the hierarchy of thought. The cast-iron
determinism of the seventies and eighties has
gone to join the materialistic ideas of Büchner
and Clifford. It is a pluralistic world now, and
lordly Intuition—a dangerous vocable—rules
over mere mental processes. (There is, as George
Henry Lewes asserted, profound truth in the
Cullen paradox: <i>i. e.</i>, there are more false facts
than false theories current.) Science only attains
the knowledge of the correspondence and
relativity of things—no mean intellectual
feat, by the way—but not of the things themselves;
one must join, adds Poincaré, to the
faculty of reasoning the gift of direct sympathy.
In a word, Intuition. Even mathematics
as an exact science is not immutable,
and the geometries of Lebatchevsky and Riemann
are as legitimate as Euclid's. And at
this point the earth beneath us begins to tremble
and the stars to totter in their spheres. Is the
age of miracles now?</p>
<p>Perhaps music is in the Fourth Dimension.
Time may be in two dimensions. Heraclitus
before Bergson compared Time to a river always
flowing, yet a permanent river: if we emerged
from this stream at a certain moment and entered
it an hour later, would it not signify that Time
has two dimensions. And where does music
stand in the eternal scheme of things? Are not
harmony with its vertical structure and melody
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_198" id="Page_198">[Pg 198]</SPAN></span>
with its horizontal flow proof that music is another
dimension in Time? Miss Williams's notion
of the Fourth Spatial Dimension is a spiritual
one. Creative Involution is to supersede the
Darwinian evolution. Again, the interior revolution
described for our salvation in the epistles
of the Apostle Paul. All roads lead to religion.
Expel religion forcibly and it returns under
strange disguises, usually as debasing superstitions.
Yet religion without dogma is like
a body without a skeleton—it can't be made
to stand upright.</p>
<p>Mathematicians are poets, and religion is
the poetry of the poor, just as philosophy is
the diversion of professors. Modern science,
said Mallock, put out the footlights of life's
stage when it denied religion. But matter, in
the light of recent experiment, is become spirit,
energy, anything but gross matter. Tyndall
might have to revise the conclusions of his
once famous Belfast address in the presence of
radium. Remy de Gourmont said that the
essential thing is to search the eternal in the
diverse and fleeting movements of form. From
a macrocosmic monster our gods are become
microcosmic; god may be a molecule, a cell.
A god to put in a phial; thus far has the zigzag
caprice of theory attained. And religion is
"a sum of scruples which impede the free exercise
of our faculties," says Salomon Reinach
in Orpheus. Bossuet did not write his Variations
in vain. All is vanity, even doctrinal
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_199" id="Page_199">[Pg 199]</SPAN></span>
fluctuations. Goethe has warned us that "Man
is not born to solve the mystery of Existence;
but he must nevertheless attempt it, in order
that he may learn how to keep within the limits
of the Knowable." Goethe detested all "thinking
about thought." Spinoza was his only philosophical
recreation.</p>
<p>Man must no longer be egocentric. The
collective soul is born. The psychology of the
mob, according to Professor Le Bon, is different
from the psychology of the individual.
We know this from the mental workings of a
jury. Twelve otherwise intelligent men put
in a jury-box contaminate each other's will
so that their united judgment is, as a rule, that
of a full-fledged imbecile. Mark Twain noted
this in his accustomed humorous (a mordant
humour) fashion, adding that trial by jury was
all very well in the time of Alfred the Great,
candle-clocks, and small communities. Miss
Williams, who sees salvation for the single
soul in the collective soul—not necessarily socialistic—nevertheless
warns parents against
the dangers in our public-school system, where
the individuality of the child is so often disturbed,
if not destroyed, by class teaching.
Mob psychology is always false psychology.
The crowd obliterates the ego. Yet to collective
consciousness may belong the future. It is
all very well for Mallock to call war the glorification,
the result, and the prop of limited class
interests. (This was years ago.) Stately,
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_200" id="Page_200">[Pg 200]</SPAN></span>
sedate, stable is the class that won't tolerate
war; a class of moral lollipops. War we must
have; it is one of the prime conditions of struggling
existence. As belief in some totem, fetich,
taboo is the basis of all superstitions, so the
superstition of yesterday builds the cathedrals
of faith to-day. (Read Frazer's Golden Bough—James
Frazer, who is the Darwin of Social
Anthropology.) Happiness requires limitations,
as a wine needs a glass to hold it; and if patriotism
is a crime of lèse-majesty against mankind,
then be it so. But like the poor, war
and patriotism are precious essences in the
scheme of life, and we shall always have them
with us. However, the warning of Miss Williams
is a timely one. At school our children's
souls are clogged with bricks and mortar, instead
of being buoyant and individual.</p>
<p>She quotes—and her little volume contains
a mosaic of apt quotations—with evident approbation
from Some Neglected Factors in
Evolution, by the late H. M. Bernard, an English
thinker: "Organic life is thus seen advancing
out of the dim past upon a series of
waves, each of which can be scanned in detail
until we come to that one on which we ourselves,
the organisms of to-day, and the human
societies to which we belong, are swept onward.
Here we must necessarily pause, but
can we doubt that the great organic rhythm
which has brought life so far will carry it on
to still greater heights in the unknown future?"
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_201" id="Page_201">[Pg 201]</SPAN></span>
Rhythm, measured flow, is the shibboleth.
Zarathustra tells us that man is a discord and
hybrid of plant and ghost. "I teach you Beyond-Man
(superman); Man is something that
will be surpassed ... once man was ape, and
is ape in a higher degree than any ape....
Man is a rope connecting animal and Beyond-Man."
"Believe that which thou seest not,"
cries Flaubert in his marvellous masque of
mythologies ancient and modern, The Temptation
of St. Anthony. Tertullian said the same
centuries before the Frenchman: Believe what
is impossible. We all do. Perhaps it is the
price we pay for cognition.</p>
<p>Miss Williams is not a Bergsonian, though
she appreciates his plastic theories. She has
a receptive mind. Henri Bergson is a mystagogue,
and all mystagogues are mythomaniacs.
He has yet to answer Professor Hugh S. R.
Elliott's three questions: "1. Bergson says,
'Time is a stuff both resistant and substantial.'
Where is the specimen on which this allegation
is founded? 2. Consciousness is to some extent
independent of cerebral structure. Professor
Bergson thinks he is disproving a crude theory
of localisation of mental qualities. Will he
furnish evidence of its existence apart from
local structure? 3. Instinct leads us to a comprehension
of life that intellect can never give.
Will Professor Bergson furnish instances of
the successes of instinct in biological inquiries
where intellect has failed?" (From Modern
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_202" id="Page_202">[Pg 202]</SPAN></span>
Science and the Illusions of Professor Bergson,
1912.) These "metaphysical curiosities,"
as they are rather contemptuously called by
Sir Ray Lankester in his preface to this solidly
reasoned confutation, are the pabulum of
numerous persons, dilettantes, with a craving
for an embellished theory of the Grand Perhaps.
Miss Williams is not the dupe of such
silken sophistries, and while her divagations
are sometimes in the air—which, like the earth,
hath bubbles, as was observed by the greatest
of poets—she plants her feet on tangible affirmations.
And to have faith we must admit
the Illative sense of John Henry Newman.
Thus "the wheel is come full circle." Creative
Involution will please mystics and mathematicians
alike. The author somersaults in
the vasty blue, but safely volplanes to mother
earth.</p>
<hr style="width: 65%;" />
<p ><span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_203" id="Page_203">[Pg 203]</SPAN></span></p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />