<h2>CHAPTER XVIII<br/> <span class="GutSmall">CONCLUDING REMARKS</span></h2>
<p><span class="smcap">There</span> are many passages in this
book, where I have been at some pains to resist the temptation of
troubling my readers with my own deductions and conclusions:
preferring that they should judge for themselves, from such
premises as I have laid before them. My only object in the
outset, was, to carry them with me faithfully wheresoever I went:
and that task I have discharged.</p>
<p>But I may be pardoned, if on such a theme as the general
character of the American people, and the general character of
their social system, as presented to a stranger’s eyes, I
desire to express my own opinions in a few words, before I bring
these volumes to a close.</p>
<p>They are, by nature, frank, brave, cordial, hospitable, and
affectionate. Cultivation and refinement seem but to
enhance their warmth of heart and ardent enthusiasm; and it is
the possession of these latter qualities in a most remarkable
degree, which renders an educated American one of the most
endearing and most generous of friends. I never was so won
upon, as by this class; never yielded up my full confidence and
esteem so readily and pleasurably, as to them; never can make
again, in half a year, so many friends for whom I seem to
entertain the regard of half a life.</p>
<p>These qualities are natural, I implicitly believe, to the
whole people. That they are, however, sadly sapped and
blighted in their growth among the mass; and that there are
influences at work which endanger them still more, and give but
little present promise of their healthy restoration; is a truth
that ought to be told.</p>
<p>It is an essential part of every national character to pique
itself mightily upon its faults, and to deduce tokens of its
virtue or its wisdom from their very exaggeration. One
great blemish in the popular mind of America, and the prolific
parent of an innumerable brood of evils, is Universal
Distrust. Yet the American citizen plumes himself upon this
spirit, even when he is sufficiently dispassionate to perceive
the ruin it works; and will often adduce it, in spite of his own
reason, as an instance of the great sagacity and acuteness of the
people, and their superior shrewdness and independence.</p>
<p>‘You carry,’ says the stranger, ‘this
jealousy and distrust into every transaction of public
life. By repelling worthy men from your legislative
assemblies, it has bred up a class of candidates for the
suffrage, who, in their very act, disgrace your Institutions and
your people’s choice. It has rendered you so fickle,
and so given to change, that your inconstancy has passed into a
proverb; for you no sooner set up an idol firmly, than you are
sure to pull it down and dash it into fragments: and this,
because directly you reward a benefactor, or a public servant,
you distrust him, merely because he is rewarded; and immediately
apply yourselves to find out, either that you have been too
bountiful in your acknowledgments, or he remiss in his
deserts. Any man who attains a high place among you, from
the President downwards, may date his downfall from that moment;
for any printed lie that any notorious villain pens, although it
militate directly against the character and conduct of a life,
appeals at once to your distrust, and is believed. You will
strain at a gnat in the way of trustfulness and confidence,
however fairly won and well deserved; but you will swallow a
whole caravan of camels, if they be laden with unworthy doubts
and mean suspicions. Is this well, think you, or likely to
elevate the character of the governors or the governed, among
you?’</p>
<p>The answer is invariably the same: ‘There’s
freedom of opinion here, you know. Every man thinks for
himself, and we are not to be easily overreached.
That’s how our people come to be suspicious.’</p>
<p>Another prominent feature is the love of ‘smart’
dealing: which gilds over many a swindle and gross breach of
trust; many a defalcation, public and private; and enables many a
knave to hold his head up with the best, who well deserves a
halter; though it has not been without its retributive operation,
for this smartness has done more in a few years to impair the
public credit, and to cripple the public resources, than dull
honesty, however rash, could have effected in a century.
The merits of a broken speculation, or a bankruptcy, or of a
successful scoundrel, are not gauged by its or his observance of
the golden rule, ‘Do as you would be done by,’ but
are considered with reference to their smartness. I
recollect, on both occasions of our passing that ill-fated Cairo
on the Mississippi, remarking on the bad effects such gross
deceits must have when they exploded, in generating a want of
confidence abroad, and discouraging foreign investment: but I was
given to understand that this was a very smart scheme by which a
deal of money had been made: and that its smartest feature was,
that they forgot these things abroad, in a very short time, and
speculated again, as freely as ever. The following dialogue
I have held a hundred times: ‘Is it not a very disgraceful
circumstance that such a man as So-and-so should be acquiring a
large property by the most infamous and odious means, and
notwithstanding all the crimes of which he has been guilty,
should be tolerated and abetted by your Citizens? He is a
public nuisance, is he not?’ ‘Yes,
sir.’ ‘A convicted liar?’
‘Yes, sir.’ ‘He has been kicked, and
cuffed, and caned?’ ‘Yes, sir.’
‘And he is utterly dishonourable, debased, and
profligate?’ ‘Yes, sir.’ ‘In
the name of wonder, then, what is his merit?’
‘Well, sir, he is a smart man.’</p>
<p>In like manner, all kinds of deficient and impolitic usages
are referred to the national love of trade; though, oddly enough,
it would be a weighty charge against a foreigner that he regarded
the Americans as a trading people. The love of trade is
assigned as a reason for that comfortless custom, so very
prevalent in country towns, of married persons living in hotels,
having no fireside of their own, and seldom meeting from early
morning until late at night, but at the hasty public meals.
The love of trade is a reason why the literature of America is to
remain for ever unprotected ‘For we are a trading people,
and don’t care for poetry:’ though we <i>do</i>, by
the way, profess to be very proud of our poets: while healthful
amusements, cheerful means of recreation, and wholesome fancies,
must fade before the stern utilitarian joys of trade.</p>
<p>These three characteristics are strongly presented at every
turn, full in the stranger’s view. But, the foul
growth of America has a more tangled root than this; and it
strikes its fibres, deep in its licentious Press.</p>
<p>Schools may be erected, East, West, North, and South; pupils
be taught, and masters reared, by scores upon scores of
thousands; colleges may thrive, churches may be crammed,
temperance may be diffused, and advancing knowledge in all other
forms walk through the land with giant strides: but while the
newspaper press of America is in, or near, its present abject
state, high moral improvement in that country is hopeless.
Year by year, it must and will go back; year by year, the tone of
public feeling must sink lower down; year by year, the Congress
and the Senate must become of less account before all decent men;
and year by year, the memory of the Great Fathers of the
Revolution must be outraged more and more, in the bad life of
their degenerate child.</p>
<p>Among the herd of journals which are published in the States,
there are some, the reader scarcely need be told, of character
and credit. From personal intercourse with accomplished
gentlemen connected with publications of this class, I have
derived both pleasure and profit. But the name of these is
Few, and of the others Legion; and the influence of the good, is
powerless to counteract the moral poison of the bad.</p>
<p>Among the gentry of America; among the well-informed and
moderate: in the learned professions; at the bar and on the
bench: there is, as there can be, but one opinion, in reference
to the vicious character of these infamous journals. It is
sometimes contended—I will not say strangely, for it is
natural to seek excuses for such a disgrace—that their
influence is not so great as a visitor would suppose. I
must be pardoned for saying that there is no warrant for this
plea, and that every fact and circumstance tends directly to the
opposite conclusion.</p>
<p>When any man, of any grade of desert in intellect or
character, can climb to any public distinction, no matter what,
in America, without first grovelling down upon the earth, and
bending the knee before this monster of depravity; when any
private excellence is safe from its attacks; when any social
confidence is left unbroken by it, or any tie of social decency
and honour is held in the least regard; when any man in that free
country has freedom of opinion, and presumes to think for
himself, and speak for himself, without humble reference to a
censorship which, for its rampant ignorance and base dishonesty,
he utterly loathes and despises in his heart; when those who most
acutely feel its infamy and the reproach it casts upon the
nation, and who most denounce it to each other, dare to set their
heels upon, and crush it openly, in the sight of all men: then, I
will believe that its influence is lessening, and men are
returning to their manly senses. But while that Press has
its evil eye in every house, and its black hand in every
appointment in the state, from a president to a postman; while,
with ribald slander for its only stock in trade, it is the
standard literature of an enormous class, who must find their
reading in a newspaper, or they will not read at all; so long
must its odium be upon the country’s head, and so long must
the evil it works, be plainly visible in the Republic.</p>
<p>To those who are accustomed to the leading English journals,
or to the respectable journals of the Continent of Europe; to
those who are accustomed to anything else in print and paper; it
would be impossible, without an amount of extract for which I
have neither space nor inclination, to convey an adequate idea of
this frightful engine in America. But if any man desire
confirmation of my statement on this head, let him repair to any
place in this city of London, where scattered numbers of these
publications are to be found; and there, let him form his own
opinion. <SPAN name="citation206"></SPAN><SPAN href="#footnote206" class="citation">[206]</SPAN></p>
<p>It would be well, there can be no doubt, for the American
people as a whole, if they loved the Real less, and the Ideal
somewhat more. It would be well, if there were greater
encouragement to lightness of heart and gaiety, and a wider
cultivation of what is beautiful, without being eminently and
directly useful. But here, I think the general
remonstrance, ‘we are a new country,’ which is so
often advanced as an excuse for defects which are quite
unjustifiable, as being, of right, only the slow growth of an old
one, may be very reasonably urged: and I yet hope to hear of
there being some other national amusement in the United States,
besides newspaper politics.</p>
<p>They certainly are not a humorous people, and their
temperament always impressed me is being of a dull and gloomy
character. In shrewdness of remark, and a certain cast-iron
quaintness, the Yankees, or people of New England, unquestionably
take the lead; as they do in most other evidences of
intelligence. But in travelling about, out of the large
cities—as I have remarked in former parts of these
volumes—I was quite oppressed by the prevailing seriousness
and melancholy air of business: which was so general and
unvarying, that at every new town I came to, I seemed to meet the
very same people whom I had left behind me, at the last.
Such defects as are perceptible in the national manners, seem, to
me, to be referable, in a great degree, to this cause: which has
generated a dull, sullen persistence in coarse usages, and
rejected the graces of life as undeserving of attention.
There is no doubt that Washington, who was always most scrupulous
and exact on points of ceremony, perceived the tendency towards
this mistake, even in his time, and did his utmost to correct
it.</p>
<p>I cannot hold with other writers on these subjects that the
prevalence of various forms of dissent in America, is in any way
attributable to the non-existence there of an established church:
indeed, I think the temper of the people, if it admitted of such
an Institution being founded amongst them, would lead them to
desert it, as a matter of course, merely because it <i>was</i>
established. But, supposing it to exist, I doubt its
probable efficacy in summoning the wandering sheep to one great
fold, simply because of the immense amount of dissent which
prevails at home; and because I do not find in America any one
form of religion with which we in Europe, or even in England, are
unacquainted. Dissenters resort thither in great numbers,
as other people do, simply because it is a land of resort; and
great settlements of them are founded, because ground can be
purchased, and towns and villages reared, where there were none
of the human creation before. But even the Shakers
emigrated from England; our country is not unknown to Mr. Joseph
Smith, the apostle of Mormonism, or to his benighted disciples; I
have beheld religious scenes myself in some of our populous towns
which can hardly be surpassed by an American camp-meeting; and I
am not aware that any instance of superstitious imposture on the
one hand, and superstitious credulity on the other, has had its
origin in the United States, which we cannot more than parallel
by the precedents of Mrs. Southcote, Mary Tofts the
rabbit-breeder, or even Mr. Thorn of Canterbury: which latter
case arose, some time after the dark ages had passed away.</p>
<p>The Republican Institutions of America undoubtedly lead the
people to assert their self-respect and their equality; but a
traveller is bound to bear those Institutions in his mind, and
not hastily to resent the near approach of a class of strangers,
who, at home, would keep aloof. This characteristic, when
it was tinctured with no foolish pride, and stopped short of no
honest service, never offended me; and I very seldom, if ever,
experienced its rude or unbecoming display. Once or twice
it was comically developed, as in the following case; but this
was an amusing incident, and not the rule, or near it.</p>
<p>I wanted a pair of boots at a certain town, for I had none to
travel in, but those with the memorable cork soles, which were
much too hot for the fiery decks of a steamboat. I
therefore sent a message to an artist in boots, importing, with
my compliments, that I should be happy to see him, if he would do
me the polite favour to call. He very kindly returned for
answer, that he would ‘look round’ at six
o’clock that evening.</p>
<p>I was lying on the sofa, with a book and a wine-glass, at
about that time, when the door opened, and a gentleman in a stiff
cravat, within a year or two on either side of thirty, entered,
in his hat and gloves; walked up to the looking-glass; arranged
his hair; took off his gloves; slowly produced a measure from the
uttermost depths of his coat-pocket; and requested me, in a
languid tone, to ‘unfix’ my straps. I complied,
but looked with some curiosity at his hat, which was still upon
his head. It might have been that, or it might have been
the heat—but he took it off. Then, he sat himself
down on a chair opposite to me; rested an arm on each knee; and,
leaning forward very much, took from the ground, by a great
effort, the specimen of metropolitan workmanship which I had just
pulled off: whistling, pleasantly, as he did so. He turned
it over and over; surveyed it with a contempt no language can
express; and inquired if I wished him to fix me a boot like
<i>that</i>? I courteously replied, that provided the boots
were large enough, I would leave the rest to him; that if
convenient and practicable, I should not object to their bearing
some resemblance to the model then before him; but that I would
be entirely guided by, and would beg to leave the whole subject
to, his judgment and discretion. ‘You an’t
partickler, about this scoop in the heel, I suppose then?’
says he: ‘we don’t foller that, here.’ I
repeated my last observation. He looked at himself in the
glass again; went closer to it to dash a grain or two of dust out
of the corner of his eye; and settled his cravat. All this
time, my leg and foot were in the air. ‘Nearly ready,
sir?’ I inquired. ‘Well, pretty nigh,’ he
said; ‘keep steady.’ I kept as steady as I
could, both in foot and face; and having by this time got the
dust out, and found his pencil-case, he measured me, and made the
necessary notes. When he had finished, he fell into his old
attitude, and taking up the boot again, mused for some
time. ‘And this,’ he said, at last, ‘is
an English boot, is it? This is a London boot,
eh?’ ‘That, sir,’ I replied, ‘is a
London boot.’ He mused over it again, after the
manner of Hamlet with Yorick’s skull; nodded his head, as
who should say, ‘I pity the Institutions that led to the
production of this boot!’; rose; put up his pencil, notes,
and paper—glancing at himself in the glass, all the
time—put on his hat—drew on his gloves very slowly;
and finally walked out. When he had been gone about a
minute, the door reopened, and his hat and his head
reappeared. He looked round the room, and at the boot
again, which was still lying on the floor; appeared thoughtful
for a minute; and then said ‘Well, good
arternoon.’ ‘Good afternoon, sir,’ said
I: and that was the end of the interview.</p>
<p>There is but one other head on which I wish to offer a remark;
and that has reference to the public health. In so vast a
country, where there are thousands of millions of acres of land
yet unsettled and uncleared, and on every rood of which,
vegetable decomposition is annually taking place; where there are
so many great rivers, and such opposite varieties of climate;
there cannot fail to be a great amount of sickness at certain
seasons. But I may venture to say, after conversing with
many members of the medical profession in America, that I am not
singular in the opinion that much of the disease which does
prevail, might be avoided, if a few common precautions were
observed. Greater means of personal cleanliness, are
indispensable to this end; the custom of hastily swallowing large
quantities of animal food, three times a-day, and rushing back to
sedentary pursuits after each meal, must be changed; the gentler
sex must go more wisely clad, and take more healthful exercise;
and in the latter clause, the males must be included also.
Above all, in public institutions, and throughout the whole of
every town and city, the system of ventilation, and drainage, and
removal of impurities requires to be thoroughly revised.
There is no local Legislature in America which may not study Mr.
Chadwick’s excellent Report upon the Sanitary Condition of
our Labouring Classes, with immense advantage.</p>
<div class="gapshortline"> </div>
<p>I <span class="smcap">have</span> now arrived at the close of
this book. I have little reason to believe, from certain
warnings I have had since I returned to England, that it will be
tenderly or favourably received by the American people; and as I
have written the Truth in relation to the mass of those who form
their judgments and express their opinions, it will be seen that
I have no desire to court, by any adventitious means, the popular
applause.</p>
<p>It is enough for me, to know, that what I have set down in
these pages, cannot cost me a single friend on the other side of
the Atlantic, who is, in anything, deserving of the name.
For the rest, I put my trust, implicitly, in the spirit in which
they have been conceived and penned; and I can bide my time.</p>
<p>I have made no reference to my reception, nor have I suffered
it to influence me in what I have written; for, in either case, I
should have offered but a sorry acknowledgment, compared with
that I bear within my breast, towards those partial readers of my
former books, across the Water, who met me with an open hand, and
not with one that closed upon an iron muzzle.</p>
<div class="gapspace"> </div>
<p style="text-align: center"><span class="GutSmall">THE
END</span></p>
<div class="gapspace"> </div>
<h2>POSTSCRIPT</h2>
<p><span class="smcap">At</span> a Public Dinner given to me on
Saturday the 18th of April, 1868, in the City of New York, by two
hundred representatives of the Press of the United States of
America, I made the following observations among others:</p>
<p>‘So much of my voice has lately been heard in the land,
that I might have been contented with troubling you no further
from my present standing-point, were it not a duty with which I
henceforth charge myself, not only here but on every suitable
occasion, whatsoever and wheresoever, to express my high and
grateful sense of my second reception in America, and to bear my
honest testimony to the national generosity and
magnanimity. Also, to declare how astounded I have been by
the amazing changes I have seen around me on every
side,—changes moral, changes physical, changes in the
amount of land subdued and peopled, changes in the rise of vast
new cities, changes in the growth of older cities almost out of
recognition, changes in the graces and amenities of life, changes
in the Press, without whose advancement no advancement can take
place anywhere. Nor am I, believe me, so arrogant as to
suppose that in five and twenty years there have been no changes
in me, and that I had nothing to learn and no extreme impressions
to correct when I was here first. And this brings me to a
point on which I have, ever since I landed in the United States
last November, observed a strict silence, though sometimes
tempted to break it, but in reference to which I will, with your
good leave, take you into my confidence now. Even the
Press, being human, may be sometimes mistaken or misinformed, and
I rather think that I have in one or two rare instances observed
its information to be not strictly accurate with reference to
myself. Indeed, I have, now and again, been more surprised
by printed news that I have read of myself, than by any printed
news that I have ever read in my present state of
existence. Thus, the vigour and perseverance with which I
have for some months past been collecting materials for, and
hammering away at, a new book on America has much astonished me;
seeing that all that time my declaration has been perfectly well
known to my publishers on both sides of the Atlantic, that no
consideration on earth would induce me to write one. But
what I have intended, what I have resolved upon (and this is the
confidence I seek to place in you) is, on my return to England,
in my own person, in my own journal, to bear, for the behoof of
my countrymen, such testimony to the gigantic changes in this
country as I have hinted at to-night. Also, to record that
wherever I have been, in the smallest places equally with the
largest, I have been received with unsurpassable politeness,
delicacy, sweet temper, hospitality, consideration, and with
unsurpassable respect for the privacy daily enforced upon me by
the nature of my avocation here and the state of my health.
This testimony, so long as I live, and so long as my descendants
have any legal right in my books, I shall cause to be
republished, as an appendix to every copy of those two books of
mine in which I have referred to America. And this I will
do and cause to be done, not in mere love and thankfulness, but
because I regard it as an act of plain justice and
honour.’</p>
<p>I said these words with the greatest earnestness that I could
lay upon them, and I repeat them in print here with equal
earnestness. So long as this book shall last, I hope that
they will form a part of it, and will be fairly read as
inseparable from my experiences and impressions of America.</p>
<p style="text-align: right"><span class="smcap">Charles
Dickens</span>.</p>
<p><i>May</i>, 1868.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />