<p><SPAN name="link2HCH0022" id="link2HCH0022"> </SPAN></p>
<br/>
<h2> CHAPTER XXII. The Old Fleet Prison. </h2>
<p>Mention is made of a prison-house standing near the River Fleet as early
as the reign of Richard I.; and this was one of the oldest jails in
London, as its first wardens, whose names are on record, Nathaniel de
Leveland, and Robert his son, paid, in 1198, a fine of sixty marks for its
custody; affirming "that it had been their inheritance ever since the
Conquest, and praying that they might not be hindered therein by the
counter-fine of Osbert de Longchamp," to whom it had been granted by the
lion-hearted monarch.</p>
<p>The next warden of the Fleet, in the days of John, was Simon Fitz-Robert,
Archdeacon of Wells,—probably a near relative of Robert de Leveland,
as the wardship of the daughter of the said Robert, as well as the custody
of the jail, was also committed to him. The freehold of the prison
continued in the Leveland family for upwards of three centuries; until, in
the reign of Philip and Mary it was, sold to John Heath for £2300—a
large sum in those days, but not more than the value of the property,
which from the way it was managed produced a large revenue to its
possessor.</p>
<p>The joint wardens of the Fleet at the time of our history were Sir Henry
Lello and John Eldred; but their office was executed by deputy in the
person of Joachim Tunstall, by whom it was rented. As will naturally be
supposed, it was the object of every deputy-warden to make as much as he
could out of the unfortunate individuals committed to his charge; and some
idea of the infamous practices of those persons may be gathered, from a
petition presented to the Lords of the Council in 1586 by the then
prisoners of the Fleet. In this it is stated that the warden had "let and
set to farm the victualling and lodging of all the house and prison of the
Fleet to one John Harvey, and the other profits of the said Fleet he had
let to one Thomas Newport, the deputy there under the warden; and these
being very poor men, having neither land nor any trade to live by, nor any
certain wages of the said warden, and being also greedy of gain, did live
by bribing and extortion. That they did most shamefully extort and exact
from the prisoners, raising new customs, fines, and payments, for their
own advantage. That they cruelly used them, shutting them up in close
prisons when they found fault with their wicked dealings; not suffering
them to come and go as they ought to do; with other abominable
misdemeanours, which, without reformation, might be the poor prisoners'
utter undoing."</p>
<p>In consequence of this petition, a commission of inquiry into the alleged
abuses was appointed; but little good was effected by it, for only seven
years later further complaints were made against the warden, charging him
with "murders and other grave misdemeanours." Still no redress was
obtained; nor was it likely it would be, when the cries of the victims of
this abominable system of oppression were so easily stifled. The most
arbitrary measures were resorted to by the officers of the prison, and
carried out with perfect impunity. Their authority was not to be disputed;
and it has been shown how obedience was enforced. Fines were inflicted and
payment made compulsory, so that the wealthy prisoner was soon reduced to
beggary. Resistance to the will of the jailers, and refusal to submit to
their exactions, were severely punished. Loaded with fetters, and almost
deprived of food, the miserable captive was locked up in a noisome
subterranean dungeon; and, if he continued obstinate, was left to rot
there. When he expired, his death was laid to the jail-fever. Rarely were
these dark prison secrets divulged, though frequently hinted at.</p>
<p>The moral condition of the prisoners was frightful. As the greater portion
of them consisted of vicious and disorderly characters, these contaminated
the whole mass, so that the place became a complete sink of abomination.
Drunkenness, smoking, dicing, card-playing, and every kind of licence were
permitted, or connived at; and the stronger prisoners were allowed to
plunder the weaker. Such was the state of things in the Fleet Prison at
the period of our history, when its misgovernment was greater than it had
ever previously been, and the condition of its inmates incomparably worse.</p>
<p>During the rebellion of Wat Tyler, the greater part of the buildings
constituting the ancient prison were burnt down, and otherwise destroyed;
and, when rebuilt, the jail was strengthened and considerably enlarged.
Its walls were of stone, now grim and hoary with age; and on the side next
to the Fleet there was a large square structure, resembling Traitor's Gate
at the Tower, and forming the sole entrance to the prison. To this gate
state-offenders were brought by water after committal by the Council of
the Star-Chamber.</p>
<p>Nothing could be sterner or gloomier than the aspect of the prison on this
side—gray and frowning walls, with a few sombre buildings peeping
above them, and a black gateway, with a yawning arch, as if looking ready
to devour the unfortunate being who approached it. Passing through a
wicket, contrived in the ponderous door, a second gate was arrived at, and
this brought the captive to the porter's lodge, where he was delivered up
to the jailers, and assigned a room in one of the wards, according to his
means of paying for it. The best of these lodgings were but indifferent;
and the worst were abominable and noisome pits.</p>
<p>On entering the outer ward, a strange scene presented itself to the view.
Motley groups were scattered about—most of the persons composing
them being clad in threadbare doublets and tattered cloaks, and wearing
caps, from which the feathers and ornaments had long since disappeared;
but there were a few—probably new coiners—in somewhat better
attire. All these wore debtors. Recklessness and effrontery were displayed
in their countenances, and their discourse was full of ribaldry and
profanity. At one side of this ward there was a large kitchen, where
eating and drinking were constantly going forward at little tables, as at
a tavern or cookshop, and where commons were served out to the poorer
prisoners.</p>
<p>Near this was a large hall, which served as the refectory of the prisoners
for debt. It was furnished with side benches of oak, and had two long
tables of the same wood; but both benches and tables were in a filthy
state, and the floor was never cleansed. Indeed, every part of the prison
was foul enough to breed a pestilence; and the place was seldom free from
fever in consequence. The upper part of the refectory was traversed by a
long corridor, on either side of which were the dormitories.</p>
<p>The arrangements of the inner ward were nearly similar, and differed only
from the outer, in so far that the accommodations were superior, as they
had need to be, considering the price asked for them; but even here
nothing like cleanliness could be found. In this ward was the chapel. At a
grated window in the gate stood the poor debtors rattling their
begging-boxes, and endeavouring by their cries to obtain alms from the
passers-by.</p>
<p>Below the warden's lodgings, which adjoined the gate, and which were now
occupied by the deputy, Joachim Tunstall, was a range of subterranean
dungeons, built below the level of the Fleet. Frequently flooded by the
river, these dungeons were exceedingly damp and unwholesome; and they were
reserved for such prisoners as had incurred the censure of the inexorable
Court of Star-Chamber. It was in one of the deepest and most dismal of
these cells that the unfortunate Sir Ferdinando Mounchensey breathed his
last.</p>
<p>Allusion has been previously made to the influence exercised within the
Fleet by Sir Giles Mompesson. Both the wardens were his friends, and ever
ready to serve him; their deputy was his creature, and subservient to his
will in all things; while the jailers and their assistants took his
orders, whatever they might be, as if from a master. Thus he was enabled
to tyrannize over the objects of his displeasure, who could never be
secure from his malice.</p>
<p>By the modes of torture he adopted through his agents, he could break the
most stubborn spirit, and subdue the strongest. It was matter of savage
satisfaction to him to witness the sufferings of his victims; and he never
ceased from persecution till he had obtained whatever he desired. The
barbarities carried out in pursuance of the atrocious sentences of the
Court of Star-Chamber were to him pleasant spectacles; and the bleeding
and mutilated wretches, whom his accusations had conducted to the pillory,
when brought back to their dungeons, could not escape his hateful presence—worse
to them, from his fiendish derision of their agonies, than that of the
executioner.</p>
<p><br/><br/></p>
<hr />
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />