<p><SPAN name="link482HCH0002" id="link482HCH0002"></SPAN></p>
<h2> Chapter XLVIII: Succession And Characters Of The Greek Emperors.—Part II. </h2>
<p>In rewarding his allies, and recalling his wife, Justinian displayed some
sense of honor and gratitude; <SPAN href="#link48note-1114"
name="link48noteref-1114" id="link48noteref-1114">1114</SPAN> and Terbelis
retired, after sweeping away a heap of gold coin, which he measured with
his Scythian whip. But never was vow more religiously performed than the
sacred oath of revenge which he had sworn amidst the storms of the Euxine.
The two usurpers (for I must reserve the name of tyrant for the conqueror)
were dragged into the hippodrome, the one from his prison, the other from
his palace. Before their execution, Leontius and Apsimar were cast
prostrate in chains beneath the throne of the emperor; and Justinian,
planting a foot on each of their necks, contemplated above an hour the
chariot-race, while the inconstant people shouted, in the words of the
Psalmist, "Thou shalt trample on the asp and basilisk, and on the lion and
dragon shalt thou set thy foot!" The universal defection which he had once
experienced might provoke him to repeat the wish of Caligula, that the
Roman people had but one head. Yet I shall presume to observe, that such a
wish is unworthy of an ingenious tyrant, since his revenge and cruelty
would have been extinguished by a single blow, instead of the slow variety
of tortures which Justinian inflicted on the victims of his anger. His
pleasures were inexhaustible: neither private virtue nor public service
could expiate the guilt of active, or even passive, obedience to an
established government; and, during the six years of his new reign, he
considered the axe, the cord, and the rack, as the only instruments of
royalty. But his most implacable hatred was pointed against the
Chersonites, who had insulted his exile and violated the laws of
hospitality. Their remote situation afforded some means of defence, or at
least of escape; and a grievous tax was imposed on Constantinople, to
supply the preparations of a fleet and army. "All are guilty, and all must
perish," was the mandate of Justinian; and the bloody execution was
intrusted to his favorite Stephen, who was recommended by the epithet of
the savage. Yet even the savage Stephen imperfectly accomplished the
intentions of his sovereign. The slowness of his attack allowed the
greater part of the inhabitants to withdraw into the country; and the
minister of vengeance contented himself with reducing the youth of both
sexes to a state of servitude, with roasting alive seven of the principal
citizens, with drowning twenty in the sea, and with reserving forty-two in
chains to receive their doom from the mouth of the emperor. In their
return, the fleet was driven on the rocky shores of Anatolia; and
Justinian applauded the obedience of the Euxine, which had involved so
many thousands of his subjects and enemies in a common shipwreck: but the
tyrant was still insatiate of blood; and a second expedition was commanded
to extirpate the remains of the proscribed colony. In the short interval,
the Chersonites had returned to their city, and were prepared to die in
arms; the khan of the Chozars had renounced the cause of his odious
brother; the exiles of every province were assembled in Tauris; and
Bardanes, under the name of Philippicus, was invested with the purple. The
Imperial troops, unwilling and unable to perpetrate the revenge of
Justinian, escaped his displeasure by abjuring his allegiance: the fleet,
under their new sovereign, steered back a more auspicious course to the
harbors of Sinope and Constantinople; and every tongue was prompt to
pronounce, every hand to execute, the death of the tyrant. Destitute of
friends, he was deserted by his Barbarian guards; and the stroke of the
assassin was praised as an act of patriotism and Roman virtue. His son
Tiberius had taken refuge in a church; his aged grandmother guarded the
door; and the innocent youth, suspending round his neck the most
formidable relics, embraced with one hand the altar, with the other the
wood of the true cross. But the popular fury that dares to trample on
superstition, is deaf to the cries of humanity; and the race of Heraclius
was extinguished after a reign of one hundred years</p>
<p><SPAN name="link48note-1114" id="link48note-1114">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
1114 (<SPAN href="#link48noteref-1114">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Of fear rather than
of more generous motives. Compare Le Beau vol. xii. p. 64.—M.]</p>
<p>Between the fall of the Heraclian and the rise of the Isaurian dynasty, a
short interval of six years is divided into three reigns. Bardanes, or
Philippicus, was hailed at Constantinople as a hero who had delivered his
country from a tyrant; and he might taste some moments of happiness in the
first transports of sincere and universal joy. Justinian had left behind
him an ample treasure, the fruit of cruelty and rapine: but this useful
fund was soon and idly dissipated by his successor. On the festival of his
birthday, Philippicus entertained the multitude with the games of the
hippodrome; from thence he paraded through the streets with a thousand
banners and a thousand trumpets; refreshed himself in the baths of
Zeuxippus, and returning to the palace, entertained his nobles with a
sumptuous banquet. At the meridian hour he withdrew to his chamber,
intoxicated with flattery and wine, and forgetful that his example had
made every subject ambitious, and that every ambitious subject was his
secret enemy. Some bold conspirators introduced themselves in the disorder
of the feast; and the slumbering monarch was surprised, bound, blinded,
and deposed, before he was sensible of his danger. Yet the traitors were
deprived of their reward; and the free voice of the senate and people
promoted Artemius from the office of secretary to that of emperor: he
assumed the title of Anastasius the Second, and displayed in a short and
troubled reign the virtues both of peace and war. But after the extinction
of the Imperial line, the rule of obedience was violated, and every change
diffused the seeds of new revolutions. In a mutiny of the fleet, an
obscure and reluctant officer of the revenue was forcibly invested with
the purple: after some months of a naval war, Anastasius resigned the
sceptre; and the conqueror, Theodosius the Third, submitted in his turn to
the superior ascendant of Leo, the general and emperor of the Oriental
troops. His two predecessors were permitted to embrace the ecclesiastical
profession: the restless impatience of Anastasius tempted him to risk and
to lose his life in a treasonable enterprise; but the last days of
Theodosius were honorable and secure. The single sublime word, "Health,"
which he inscribed on his tomb, expresses the confidence of philosophy or
religion; and the fame of his miracles was long preserved among the people
of Ephesus. This convenient shelter of the church might sometimes impose a
lesson of clemency; but it may be questioned whether it is for the public
interest to diminish the perils of unsuccessful ambition.</p>
<p>I have dwelt on the fall of a tyrant; I shall briefly represent the
founder of a new dynasty, who is known to posterity by the invectives of
his enemies, and whose public and private life is involved in the
ecclesiastical story of the Iconoclasts. Yet in spite of the clamors of
superstition, a favorable prejudice for the character of Leo the Isaurian
may be reasonably drawn from the obscurity of his birth, and the duration
of his reign.—I. In an age of manly spirit, the prospect of an
Imperial reward would have kindled every energy of the mind, and produced
a crowd of competitors as deserving as they were desirous to reign. Even
in the corruption and debility of the modern Greeks, the elevation of a
plebeian from the last to the first rank of society, supposes some
qualifications above the level of the multitude. He would probably be
ignorant and disdainful of speculative science; and, in the pursuit of
fortune, he might absolve himself from the obligations of benevolence and
justice; but to his character we may ascribe the useful virtues of
prudence and fortitude, the knowledge of mankind, and the important art of
gaining their confidence and directing their passions. It is agreed that
Leo was a native of Isauria, and that Conon was his primitive name. The
writers, whose awkward satire is praise, describe him as an itinerant
pedler, who drove an ass with some paltry merchandise to the country
fairs; and foolishly relate that he met on the road some Jewish
fortune-tellers, who promised him the Roman empire, on condition that he
should abolish the worship of idols. A more probable account relates the
migration of his father from Asia Minor to Thrace, where he exercised the
lucrative trade of a grazier; and he must have acquired considerable
wealth, since the first introduction of his son was procured by a supply
of five hundred sheep to the Imperial camp. His first service was in the
guards of Justinian, where he soon attracted the notice, and by degrees
the jealousy, of the tyrant. His valor and dexterity were conspicuous in
the Colchian war: from Anastasius he received the command of the Anatolian
legions, and by the suffrage of the soldiers he was raised to the empire
with the general applause of the Roman world.—II. In this dangerous
elevation, Leo the Third supported himself against the envy of his equals,
the discontent of a powerful faction, and the assaults of his foreign and
domestic enemies. The Catholics, who accuse his religious innovations, are
obliged to confess that they were undertaken with temper and conducted
with firmness. Their silence respects the wisdom of his administration and
the purity of his manners. After a reign of twenty-four years, he
peaceably expired in the palace of Constantinople; and the purple which he
had acquired was transmitted by the right of inheritance to the third
generation. <SPAN href="#link48note-1115" name="link48noteref-1115" id="link48noteref-1115">1115</SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN name="link48note-1115" id="link48note-1115">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
1115 (<SPAN href="#link48noteref-1115">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ During the latter
part of his reign, the hostilities of the Saracens, who invested a
Pergamenian, named Tiberius, with the purple, and proclaimed him as the
son of Justinian, and an earthquake, which destroyed the walls of
Constantinople, compelled Leo greatly to increase the burdens of taxation
upon his subjects. A twelfth was exacted in addition to every aurena as a
wall tax. Theophanes p. 275 Schlosser, Bilder eturmeud Kaiser, p. 197.—M.]</p>
<p>In a long reign of thirty-four years, the son and successor of Leo,
Constantine the Fifth, surnamed Copronymus, attacked with less temperate
zeal the images or idols of the church. Their votaries have exhausted the
bitterness of religious gall, in their portrait of this spotted panther,
this antichrist, this flying dragon of the serpent's seed, who surpassed
the vices of Elagabalus and Nero. His reign was a long butchery of
whatever was most noble, or holy, or innocent, in his empire. In person,
the emperor assisted at the execution of his victims, surveyed their
agonies, listened to their groans, and indulged, without satiating, his
appetite for blood: a plate of noses was accepted as a grateful offering,
and his domestics were often scourged or mutilated by the royal hand. His
surname was derived from his pollution of his baptismal font. The infant
might be excused; but the manly pleasures of Copronymus degraded him below
the level of a brute; his lust confounded the eternal distinctions of sex
and species, and he seemed to extract some unnatural delight from the
objects most offensive to human sense. In his religion the Iconoclast was
a Heretic, a Jew, a Mahometan, a Pagan, and an Atheist; and his belief of
an invisible power could be discovered only in his magic rites, human
victims, and nocturnal sacrifices to Venus and the daemons of antiquity.
His life was stained with the most opposite vices, and the ulcers which
covered his body, anticipated before his death the sentiment of
hell-tortures. Of these accusations, which I have so patiently copied, a
part is refuted by its own absurdity; and in the private anecdotes of the
life of the princes, the lie is more easy as the detection is more
difficult. Without adopting the pernicious maxim, that where much is
alleged, something must be true, I can however discern, that Constantine
the Fifth was dissolute and cruel. Calumny is more prone to exaggerate
than to invent; and her licentious tongue is checked in some measure by
the experience of the age and country to which she appeals. Of the bishops
and monks, the generals and magistrates, who are said to have suffered
under his reign, the numbers are recorded, the names were conspicuous, the
execution was public, the mutilation visible and permanent. <SPAN href="#link48note-1116" name="link48noteref-1116" id="link48noteref-1116">1116</SPAN>
The Catholics hated the person and government of Copronymus; but even
their hatred is a proof of their oppression. They dissembled the
provocations which might excuse or justify his rigor, but even these
provocations must gradually inflame his resentment and harden his temper
in the use or the abuse of despotism. Yet the character of the fifth
Constantine was not devoid of merit, nor did his government always deserve
the curses or the contempt of the Greeks. From the confession of his
enemies, I am informed of the restoration of an ancient aqueduct, of the
redemption of two thousand five hundred captives, of the uncommon plenty
of the times, and of the new colonies with which he repeopled
Constantinople and the Thracian cities. They reluctantly praise his
activity and courage; he was on horseback in the field at the head of his
legions; and, although the fortune of his arms was various, he triumphed
by sea and land, on the Euphrates and the Danube, in civil and Barbarian
war. Heretical praise must be cast into the scale to counterbalance the
weight of orthodox invective. The Iconoclasts revered the virtues of the
prince: forty years after his death they still prayed before the tomb of
the saint. A miraculous vision was propagated by fanaticism or fraud: and
the Christian hero appeared on a milk-white steed, brandishing his lance
against the Pagans of Bulgaria: "An absurd fable," says the Catholic
historian, "since Copronymus is chained with the daemons in the abyss of
hell."</p>
<p><SPAN name="link48note-1116" id="link48note-1116">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
1116 (<SPAN href="#link48noteref-1116">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ He is accused of
burning the library of Constantinople, founded by Julian, with its
president and twelve professors. This eastern Sorbonne had discomfited the
Imperial theologians on the great question of image worship. Schlosser
observes that this accidental fire took place six years after the emperor
had laid the question of image-worship before the professors. Bilder
sturmand Kaiser, p. 294. Compare Le Heau. vol. xl. p. 156.—M.]</p>
<p>Leo the Fourth, the son of the fifth and the father of the sixth
Constantine, was of a feeble constitution both of mind <SPAN href="#link48note-1117" name="link48noteref-1117" id="link48noteref-1117">1117</SPAN>
and body, and the principal care of his reign was the settlement of the
succession. The association of the young Constantine was urged by the
officious zeal of his subjects; and the emperor, conscious of his decay,
complied, after a prudent hesitation, with their unanimous wishes. The
royal infant, at the age of five years, was crowned with his mother Irene;
and the national consent was ratified by every circumstance of pomp and
solemnity, that could dazzle the eyes or bind the conscience of the
Greeks. An oath of fidelity was administered in the palace, the church,
and the hippodrome, to the several orders of the state, who adjured the
holy names of the Son, and mother of God. "Be witness, O Christ! that we
will watch over the safety of Constantine the son of Leo, expose our lives
in his service, and bear true allegiance to his person and posterity."
They pledged their faith on the wood of the true cross, and the act of
their engagement was deposited on the altar of St. Sophia. The first to
swear, and the first to violate their oath, were the five sons of
Copronymus by a second marriage; and the story of these princes is
singular and tragic. The right of primogeniture excluded them from the
throne; the injustice of their elder brother defrauded them of a legacy of
about two millions sterling; some vain titles were not deemed a sufficient
compensation for wealth and power; and they repeatedly conspired against
their nephew, before and after the death of his father. Their first
attempt was pardoned; for the second offence <SPAN href="#link48note-1118"
name="link48noteref-1118" id="link48noteref-1118">1118</SPAN> they were
condemned to the ecclesiastical state; and for the third treason,
Nicephorus, the eldest and most guilty, was deprived of his eyes, and his
four brothers, Christopher, Nicetas, Anthemeus, and Eudoxas, were
punished, as a milder sentence, by the amputation of their tongues. After
five years' confinement, they escaped to the church of St. Sophia, and
displayed a pathetic spectacle to the people. "Countrymen and Christians,"
cried Nicephorus for himself and his mute brethren, "behold the sons of
your emperor, if you can still recognize our features in this miserable
state. A life, an imperfect life, is all that the malice of our enemies
has spared. It is now threatened, and we now throw ourselves on your
compassion." The rising murmur might have produced a revolution, had it
not been checked by the presence of a minister, who soothed the unhappy
princes with flattery and hope, and gently drew them from the sanctuary to
the palace. They were speedily embarked for Greece, and Athens was
allotted for the place of their exile. In this calm retreat, and in their
helpless condition, Nicephorus and his brothers were tormented by the
thirst of power, and tempted by a Sclavonian chief, who offered to break
their prison, and to lead them in arms, and in the purple, to the gates of
Constantinople. But the Athenian people, ever zealous in the cause of
Irene, prevented her justice or cruelty; and the five sons of Copronymus
were plunged in eternal darkness and oblivion.</p>
<p><SPAN name="link48note-1117" id="link48note-1117">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
1117 (<SPAN href="#link48noteref-1117">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Schlosser thinks
more highly of Leo's mind; but his only proof of his superiority is the
successes of his generals against the Saracens, Schlosser, p. 256.—M.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link48note-1118" id="link48note-1118">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
1118 (<SPAN href="#link48noteref-1118">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ The second offence
was on the accession of the young Constantine—M.]</p>
<p>For himself, that emperor had chosen a Barbarian wife, the daughter of the
khan of the Chozars; but in the marriage of his heir, he preferred an
Athenian virgin, an orphan, seventeen years old, whose sole fortune must
have consisted in her personal accomplishments. The nuptials of Leo and
Irene were celebrated with royal pomp; she soon acquired the love and
confidence of a feeble husband, and in his testament he declared the
empress guardian of the Roman world, and of their son Constantine the
Sixth, who was no more than ten years of age. During his childhood, Irene
most ably and assiduously discharged, in her public administration, the
duties of a faithful mother; and her zeal in the restoration of images has
deserved the name and honors of a saint, which she still occupies in the
Greek calendar. But the emperor attained the maturity of youth; the
maternal yoke became more grievous; and he listened to the favorites of
his own age, who shared his pleasures, and were ambitious of sharing his
power. Their reasons convinced him of his right, their praises of his
ability, to reign; and he consented to reward the services of Irene by a
perpetual banishment to the Isle of Sicily. But her vigilance and
penetration easily disconcerted their rash projects: a similar, or more
severe, punishment was retaliated on themselves and their advisers; and
Irene inflicted on the ungrateful prince the chastisement of a boy. After
this contest, the mother and the son were at the head of two domestic
factions; and instead of mild influence and voluntary obedience, she held
in chains a captive and an enemy. The empress was overthrown by the abuse
of victory; the oath of fidelity, which she exacted to herself alone, was
pronounced with reluctant murmurs; and the bold refusal of the Armenian
guards encouraged a free and general declaration, that Constantine the
Sixth was the lawful emperor of the Romans. In this character he ascended
his hereditary throne, and dismissed Irene to a life of solitude and
repose. But her haughty spirit condescended to the arts of dissimulation:
she flattered the bishops and eunuchs, revived the filial tenderness of
the prince, regained his confidence, and betrayed his credulity. The
character of Constantine was not destitute of sense or spirit; but his
education had been studiously neglected; and the ambitious mother exposed
to the public censure the vices which she had nourished, and the actions
which she had secretly advised: his divorce and second marriage offended
the prejudices of the clergy, and by his imprudent rigor he forfeited the
attachment of the Armenian guards. A powerful conspiracy was formed for
the restoration of Irene; and the secret, though widely diffused, was
faithfully kept above eight months, till the emperor, suspicious of his
danger, escaped from Constantinople, with the design of appealing to the
provinces and armies. By this hasty flight, the empress was left on the
brink of the precipice; yet before she implored the mercy of her son,
Irene addressed a private epistle to the friends whom she had placed about
his person, with a menace, that unless they accomplished, she would
reveal, their treason. Their fear rendered them intrepid; they seized the
emperor on the Asiatic shore, and he was transported to the porphyry
apartment of the palace, where he had first seen the light. In the mind of
Irene, ambition had stifled every sentiment of humanity and nature; and it
was decreed in her bloody council, that Constantine should be rendered
incapable of the throne: her emissaries assaulted the sleeping prince, and
stabbed their daggers with such violence and precipitation into his eyes
as if they meant to execute a mortal sentence. An ambiguous passage of
Theophanes persuaded the annalist of the church that death was the
immediate consequence of this barbarous execution. The Catholics have been
deceived or subdued by the authority of Baronius; and Protestant zeal has
reechoed the words of a cardinal, desirous, as it should seem, to favor
the patroness of images. <SPAN href="#link48note-1119"
name="link48noteref-1119" id="link48noteref-1119">1119</SPAN> Yet the blind
son of Irene survived many years, oppressed by the court and forgotten by
the world; the Isaurian dynasty was silently extinguished; and the memory
of Constantine was recalled only by the nuptials of his daughter
Euphrosyne with the emperor Michael the Second.</p>
<p><SPAN name="link48note-1119" id="link48note-1119">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
1119 (<SPAN href="#link48noteref-1119">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Gibbon has been
attacked on account of this statement, but is successfully defended by
Schlosser. B S. Kaiser p. 327. Compare Le Beau, c. xii p. 372.—M.]</p>
<p>The most bigoted orthodoxy has justly execrated the unnatural mother, who
may not easily be paralleled in the history of crimes. To her bloody deed
superstition has attributed a subsequent darkness of seventeen days;
during which many vessels in midday were driven from their course, as if
the sun, a globe of fire so vast and so remote, could sympathize with the
atoms of a revolving planet. On earth, the crime of Irene was left five
years unpunished; her reign was crowned with external splendor; and if she
could silence the voice of conscience, she neither heard nor regarded the
reproaches of mankind. The Roman world bowed to the government of a
female; and as she moved through the streets of Constantinople, the reins
of four milk-white steeds were held by as many patricians, who marched on
foot before the golden chariot of their queen. But these patricians were
for the most part eunuchs; and their black ingratitude justified, on this
occasion, the popular hatred and contempt. Raised, enriched, intrusted
with the first dignities of the empire, they basely conspired against
their benefactress; the great treasurer Nicephorus was secretly invested
with the purple; her successor was introduced into the palace, and crowned
at St. Sophia by the venal patriarch. In their first interview, she
recapitulated with dignity the revolutions of her life, gently accused the
perfidy of Nicephorus, insinuated that he owed his life to her
unsuspicious clemency, and for the throne and treasures which she
resigned, solicited a decent and honorable retreat. His avarice refused
this modest compensation; and, in her exile of the Isle of Lesbos, the
empress earned a scanty subsistence by the labors of her distaff.</p>
<p>Many tyrants have reigned undoubtedly more criminal than Nicephorus, but
none perhaps have more deeply incurred the universal abhorrence of their
people. His character was stained with the three odious vices of
hypocrisy, ingratitude, and avarice: his want of virtue was not redeemed
by any superior talents, nor his want of talents by any pleasing
qualifications. Unskilful and unfortunate in war, Nicephorus was
vanquished by the Saracens, and slain by the Bulgarians; and the advantage
of his death overbalanced, in the public opinion, the destruction of a
Roman army. <SPAN href="#link48note-1011" name="link48noteref-1011" id="link48noteref-1011">1011</SPAN> His son and heir Stauracius escaped from
the field with a mortal wound; yet six months of an expiring life were
sufficient to refute his indecent, though popular declaration, that he
would in all things avoid the example of his father. On the near prospect
of his decease, Michael, the great master of the palace, and the husband
of his sister Procopia, was named by every person of the palace and city,
except by his envious brother. Tenacious of a sceptre now falling from his
hand, he conspired against the life of his successor, and cherished the
idea of changing to a democracy the Roman empire. But these rash projects
served only to inflame the zeal of the people and to remove the scruples
of the candidate: Michael the First accepted the purple, and before he
sunk into the grave the son of Nicephorus implored the clemency of his new
sovereign. Had Michael in an age of peace ascended an hereditary throne,
he might have reigned and died the father of his people: but his mild
virtues were adapted to the shade of private life, nor was he capable of
controlling the ambition of his equals, or of resisting the arms of the
victorious Bulgarians. While his want of ability and success exposed him
to the contempt of the soldiers, the masculine spirit of his wife Procopia
awakened their indignation. Even the Greeks of the ninth century were
provoked by the insolence of a female, who, in the front of the standards,
presumed to direct their discipline and animate their valor; and their
licentious clamors advised the new Semiramis to reverence the majesty of a
Roman camp. After an unsuccessful campaign, the emperor left, in their
winter-quarters of Thrace, a disaffected army under the command of his
enemies; and their artful eloquence persuaded the soldiers to break the
dominion of the eunuchs, to degrade the husband of Procopia, and to assert
the right of a military election. They marched towards the capital: yet
the clergy, the senate, and the people of Constantinople, adhered to the
cause of Michael; and the troops and treasures of Asia might have
protracted the mischiefs of civil war. But his humanity (by the ambitious
it will be termed his weakness) protested that not a drop of Christian
blood should be shed in his quarrel, and his messengers presented the
conquerors with the keys of the city and the palace. They were disarmed by
his innocence and submission; his life and his eyes were spared; and the
Imperial monk enjoyed the comforts of solitude and religion above
thirty-two years after he had been stripped of the purple and separated
from his wife.</p>
<p><SPAN name="link48note-1011" id="link48note-1011">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
1011 (<SPAN href="#link48noteref-1011">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ The Syrian
historian Aboulfaradj. Chron. Syr. p. 133, 139, speaks of him as a brave,
prudent, and pious prince, formidable to the Arabs. St. Martin, c. xii. p.
402. Compare Schlosser, p. 350.—M.]</p>
<p>A rebel, in the time of Nicephorus, the famous and unfortunate Bardanes,
had once the curiosity to consult an Asiatic prophet, who, after
prognosticating his fall, announced the fortunes of his three principal
officers, Leo the Armenian, Michael the Phrygian, and Thomas the
Cappadocian, the successive reigns of the two former, the fruitless and
fatal enterprise of the third. This prediction was verified, or rather was
produced, by the event. Ten years afterwards, when the Thracian camp
rejected the husband of Procopia, the crown was presented to the same Leo,
the first in military rank and the secret author of the mutiny. As he
affected to hesitate, "With this sword," said his companion Michael, "I
will open the gates of Constantinople to your Imperial sway; or instantly
plunge it into your bosom, if you obstinately resist the just desires of
your fellow-soldiers." The compliance of the Armenian was rewarded with
the empire, and he reigned seven years and a half under the name of Leo
the Fifth. Educated in a camp, and ignorant both of laws and letters, he
introduced into his civil government the rigor and even cruelty of
military discipline; but if his severity was sometimes dangerous to the
innocent, it was always formidable to the guilty. His religious
inconstancy was taxed by the epithet of Chameleon, but the Catholics have
acknowledged by the voice of a saint and confessors, that the life of the
Iconoclast was useful to the republic. The zeal of his companion Michael
was repaid with riches, honors, and military command; and his subordinate
talents were beneficially employed in the public service. Yet the Phrygian
was dissatisfied at receiving as a favor a scanty portion of the Imperial
prize which he had bestowed on his equal; and his discontent, which
sometimes evaporated in hasty discourse, at length assumed a more
threatening and hostile aspect against a prince whom he represented as a
cruel tyrant. That tyrant, however, repeatedly detected, warned, and
dismissed the old companion of his arms, till fear and resentment
prevailed over gratitude; and Michael, after a scrutiny into his actions
and designs, was convicted of treason, and sentenced to be burnt alive in
the furnace of the private baths. The devout humanity of the empress
Theophano was fatal to her husband and family. A solemn day, the
twenty-fifth of December, had been fixed for the execution: she urged,
that the anniversary of the Savior's birth would be profaned by this
inhuman spectacle, and Leo consented with reluctance to a decent respite.
But on the vigil of the feast his sleepless anxiety prompted him to visit
at the dead of night the chamber in which his enemy was confined: he
beheld him released from his chain, and stretched on his jailer's bed in a
profound slumber. Leo was alarmed at these signs of security and
intelligence; but though he retired with silent steps, his entrance and
departure were noticed by a slave who lay concealed in a corner of the
prison. Under the pretence of requesting the spiritual aid of a confessor,
Michael informed the conspirators, that their lives depended on his
discretion, and that a few hours were left to assure their own safety, by
the deliverance of their friend and country. On the great festivals, a
chosen band of priests and chanters was admitted into the palace by a
private gate to sing matins in the chapel; and Leo, who regulated with the
same strictness the discipline of the choir and of the camp, was seldom
absent from these early devotions. In the ecclesiastical habit, but with
their swords under their robes, the conspirators mingled with the
procession, lurked in the angles of the chapel, and expected, as the
signal of murder, the intonation of the first psalm by the emperor
himself. The imperfect light, and the uniformity of dress, might have
favored his escape, whilst their assault was pointed against a harmless
priest; but they soon discovered their mistake, and encompassed on all
sides the royal victim. Without a weapon and without a friend, he grasped
a weighty cross, and stood at bay against the hunters of his life; but as
he asked for mercy, "This is the hour, not of mercy, but of vengeance,"
was the inexorable reply. The stroke of a well-aimed sword separated from
his body the right arm and the cross, and Leo the Armenian was slain at
the foot of the altar. A memorable reverse of fortune was displayed in
Michael the Second, who from a defect in his speech was surnamed the
Stammerer. He was snatched from the fiery furnace to the sovereignty of an
empire; and as in the tumult a smith could not readily be found, the
fetters remained on his legs several hours after he was seated on the
throne of the Caesars. The royal blood which had been the price of his
elevation, was unprofitably spent: in the purple he retained the ignoble
vices of his origin; and Michael lost his provinces with as supine
indifference as if they had been the inheritance of his fathers. His title
was disputed by Thomas, the last of the military triumvirate, who
transported into Europe fourscore thousand Barbarians from the banks of
the Tigris and the shores of the Caspian. He formed the siege of
Constantinople; but the capital was defended with spiritual and carnal
weapons; a Bulgarian king assaulted the camp of the Orientals, and Thomas
had the misfortune, or the weakness, to fall alive into the power of the
conqueror. The hands and feet of the rebel were amputated; he was placed
on an ass, and, amidst the insults of the people, was led through the
streets, which he sprinkled with his blood. The depravation of manners, as
savage as they were corrupt, is marked by the presence of the emperor
himself. Deaf to the lamentation of a fellow-soldier, he incessantly
pressed the discovery of more accomplices, till his curiosity was checked
by the question of an honest or guilty minister: "Would you give credit to
an enemy against the most faithful of your friends?" After the death of
his first wife, the emperor, at the request of the senate, drew from her
monastery Euphrosyne, the daughter of Constantine the Sixth. Her august
birth might justify a stipulation in the marriage-contract, that her
children should equally share the empire with their elder brother. But the
nuptials of Michael and Euphrosyne were barren; and she was content with
the title of mother of Theophilus, his son and successor.</p>
<p>The character of Theophilus is a rare example in which religious zeal has
allowed, and perhaps magnified, the virtues of a heretic and a persecutor.
His valor was often felt by the enemies, and his justice by the subjects,
of the monarchy; but the valor of Theophilus was rash and fruitless, and
his justice arbitrary and cruel. He displayed the banner of the cross
against the Saracens; but his five expeditions were concluded by a signal
overthrow: Amorium, the native city of his ancestors, was levelled with
the ground and from his military toils he derived only the surname of the
Unfortunate. The wisdom of a sovereign is comprised in the institution of
laws and the choice of magistrates, and while he seems without action, his
civil government revolves round his centre with the silence and order of
the planetary system. But the justice of Theophilus was fashioned on the
model of the Oriental despots, who, in personal and irregular acts of
authority, consult the reason or passion of the moment, without measuring
the sentence by the law, or the penalty by the offense. A poor woman threw
herself at the emperor's feet to complain of a powerful neighbor, the
brother of the empress, who had raised his palace-wall to such an
inconvenient height, that her humble dwelling was excluded from light and
air! On the proof of the fact, instead of granting, like an ordinary
judge, sufficient or ample damages to the plaintiff, the sovereign
adjudged to her use and benefit the palace and the ground. Nor was
Theophilus content with this extravagant satisfaction: his zeal converted
a civil trespass into a criminal act; and the unfortunate patrician was
stripped and scourged in the public place of Constantinople. For some
venial offenses, some defect of equity or vigilance, the principal
ministers, a praefect, a quaestor, a captain of the guards, were banished
or mutilated, or scalded with boiling pitch, or burnt alive in the
hippodrome; and as these dreadful examples might be the effects of error
or caprice, they must have alienated from his service the best and wisest
of the citizens. But the pride of the monarch was flattered in the
exercise of power, or, as he thought, of virtue; and the people, safe in
their obscurity, applauded the danger and debasement of their superiors.
This extraordinary rigor was justified, in some measure, by its salutary
consequences; since, after a scrutiny of seventeen days, not a complaint
or abuse could be found in the court or city; and it might be alleged that
the Greeks could be ruled only with a rod of iron, and that the public
interest is the motive and law of the supreme judge. Yet in the crime, or
the suspicion, of treason, that judge is of all others the most credulous
and partial. Theophilus might inflict a tardy vengeance on the assassins
of Leo and the saviors of his father; but he enjoyed the fruits of their
crime; and his jealous tyranny sacrificed a brother and a prince to the
future safety of his life. A Persian of the race of the Sassanides died in
poverty and exile at Constantinople, leaving an only son, the issue of a
plebeian marriage. At the age of twelve years, the royal birth of
Theophobus was revealed, and his merit was not unworthy of his birth. He
was educated in the Byzantine palace, a Christian and a soldier; advanced
with rapid steps in the career of fortune and glory; received the hand of
the emperor's sister; and was promoted to the command of thirty thousand
Persians, who, like his father, had fled from the Mahometan conquerors.
These troops, doubly infected with mercenary and fanatic vices, were
desirous of revolting against their benefactor, and erecting the standard
of their native king but the loyal Theophobus rejected their offers,
disconcerted their schemes, and escaped from their hands to the camp or
palace of his royal brother. A generous confidence might have secured a
faithful and able guardian for his wife and his infant son, to whom
Theophilus, in the flower of his age, was compelled to leave the
inheritance of the empire. But his jealousy was exasperated by envy and
disease; he feared the dangerous virtues which might either support or
oppress their infancy and weakness; and the dying emperor demanded the
head of the Persian prince. With savage delight he recognized the familiar
features of his brother: "Thou art no longer Theophobus," he said; and,
sinking on his couch, he added, with a faltering voice, "Soon, too soon, I
shall be no more Theophilus!"</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />