<p><SPAN name="link472HCH0002" id="link472HCH0002"></SPAN></p>
<h2> Chapter XLVII: Ecclesiastical Discord.—Part II. </h2>
<p>The prize was not unworthy of his ambition. At a distance from the court,
and at the head of an immense capital, the patriarch, as he was now
styled, of Alexandria had gradually usurped the state and authority of a
civil magistrate. The public and private charities of the city were
blindly obeyed by his numerous and fanatic parabolani, <SPAN href="#link47note-24" name="link47noteref-24" id="link47noteref-24">24</SPAN>
familiarized in their daily office with scenes of death; and the praefects
of Egypt were awed or provoked by the temporal power of these Christian
pontiffs. Ardent in the prosecution of heresy, Cyril auspiciously opened
his reign by oppressing the Novatians, the most innocent and harmless of
the sectaries. The interdiction of their religious worship appeared in his
eyes a just and meritorious act; and he confiscated their holy vessels,
without apprehending the guilt of sacrilege. The toleration, and even the
privileges of the Jews, who had multiplied to the number of forty
thousand, were secured by the laws of the Caesars and Ptolemies, and a
long prescription of seven hundred years since the foundation of
Alexandria. Without any legal sentence, without any royal mandate, the
patriarch, at the dawn of day, led a seditious multitude to the attack of
the synagogues. Unarmed and unprepared, the Jews were incapable of
resistance; their houses of prayer were levelled with the ground, and the
episcopal warrior, after-rewarding his troops with the plunder of their
goods, expelled from the city the remnant of the unbelieving nation.
Perhaps he might plead the insolence of their prosperity, and their deadly
hatred of the Christians, whose blood they had recently shed in a
malicious or accidental tumult.</p>
<p>Such crimes would have deserved the animadversion of the magistrate; but
in this promiscuous outrage, the innocent were confounded with the guilty,
and Alexandria was impoverished by the loss of a wealthy and industrious
colony. The zeal of Cyril exposed him to the penalties of the Julian law;
but in a feeble government and a superstitious age, he was secure of
impunity, and even of praise. Orestes complained; but his just complaints
were too quickly forgotten by the ministers of Theodosius, and too deeply
remembered by a priest who affected to pardon, and continued to hate, the
praefect of Egypt. As he passed through the streets, his chariot was
assaulted by a band of five hundred of the Nitrian monks his guards fled
from the wild beasts of the desert; his protestations that he was a
Christian and a Catholic were answered by a volley of stones, and the face
of Orestes was covered with blood. The loyal citizens of Alexandria
hastened to his rescue; he instantly satisfied his justice and revenge
against the monk by whose hand he had been wounded, and Ammonius expired
under the rod of the lictor. At the command of Cyril his body was raised
from the ground, and transported, in solemn procession, to the cathedral;
the name of Ammonius was changed to that of Thaumasius the wonderful; his
tomb was decorated with the trophies of martyrdom, and the patriarch
ascended the pulpit to celebrate the magnanimity of an assassin and a
rebel. Such honors might incite the faithful to combat and die under the
banners of the saint; and he soon prompted, or accepted, the sacrifice of
a virgin, who professed the religion of the Greeks, and cultivated the
friendship of Orestes. Hypatia, the daughter of Theon the mathematician,
<SPAN href="#link47note-25" name="link47noteref-25" id="link47noteref-25">25</SPAN>
was initiated in her father's studies; her learned comments have
elucidated the geometry of Apollonius and Diophantus, and she publicly
taught, both at Athens and Alexandria, the philosophy of Plato and
Aristotle. In the bloom of beauty, and in the maturity of wisdom, the
modest maid refused her lovers and instructed her disciples; the persons
most illustrious for their rank or merit were impatient to visit the
female philosopher; and Cyril beheld, with a jealous eye, the gorgeous
train of horses and slaves who crowded the door of her academy. A rumor
was spread among the Christians, that the daughter of Theon was the only
obstacle to the reconciliation of the praefect and the archbishop; and
that obstacle was speedily removed. On a fatal day, in the holy season of
Lent, Hypatia was torn from her chariot, stripped naked, dragged to the
church, and inhumanly butchered by the hands of Peter the reader, and a
troop of savage and merciless fanatics: her flesh was scraped from her
bones with sharp cyster shells, <SPAN href="#link47note-26"
name="link47noteref-26" id="link47noteref-26">26</SPAN> and her quivering
limbs were delivered to the flames. The just progress of inquiry and
punishment was stopped by seasonable gifts; but the murder of Hypatia has
imprinted an indelible stain on the character and religion of Cyril of
Alexandria. <SPAN href="#link47note-27" name="link47noteref-27" id="link47noteref-27">27</SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN name="link47note-24" id="link47note-24">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
24 (<SPAN href="#link47noteref-24">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ The Parabolani of
Alexandria were a charitable corporation, instituted during the plague of
Gallienus, to visit the sick and to bury the dead. They gradually
enlarged, abused, and sold the privileges of their order. Their outrageous
conduct during the reign of Cyril provoked the emperor to deprive the
patriarch of their nomination, and to restrain their number to five or six
hundred. But these restraints were transient and ineffectual. See the
Theodosian Code, l. xvi. tit. ii. and Tillemont, Mem. Eccles. tom. xiv. p.
276—278.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link47note-25" id="link47note-25">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
25 (<SPAN href="#link47noteref-25">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ For Theon and his
daughter Hypatia. see Fabricius, Bibliothec. tom. viii. p. 210, 211. Her
article in the Lexicon of Suidas is curious and original. Hesychius
(Meursii Opera, tom. vii. p. 295, 296) observes, that he was persecuted;
and an epigram in the Greek Anthology (l. i. c. 76, p. 159, edit. Brodaei)
celebrates her knowledge and eloquence. She is honorably mentioned (Epist.
10, 15 16, 33—80, 124, 135, 153) by her friend and disciple the
philosophic bishop Synesius.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link47note-26" id="link47note-26">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
26 (<SPAN href="#link47noteref-26">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Oyster shells were
plentifully strewed on the sea-beach before the Caesareum. I may therefore
prefer the literal sense, without rejecting the metaphorical version of
tegulae, tiles, which is used by M. de Valois ignorant, and the assassins
were probably regardless, whether their victim was yet alive.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link47note-27" id="link47note-27">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
27 (<SPAN href="#link47noteref-27">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ These exploits of St.
Cyril are recorded by Socrates, (l. vii. c. 13, 14, 15;) and the most
reluctant bigotry is compelled to copy an historian who coolly styles the
murderers of Hypatia. At the mention of that injured name, I am pleased to
observe a blush even on the cheek of Baronius, (A.D. 415, No. 48.)]</p>
<p>Superstition, perhaps, would more gently expiate the blood of a virgin,
than the banishment of a saint; and Cyril had accompanied his uncle to the
iniquitous synod of the Oak. When the memory of Chrysostom was restored
and consecrated, the nephew of Theophilus, at the head of a dying faction,
still maintained the justice of his sentence; nor was it till after a
tedious delay and an obstinate resistance, that he yielded to the consent
of the Catholic world. <SPAN href="#link47note-28" name="link47noteref-28" id="link47noteref-28">28</SPAN> His enmity to the Byzantine pontiffs <SPAN href="#link47note-29" name="link47noteref-29" id="link47noteref-29">29</SPAN>
was a sense of interest, not a sally of passion: he envied their fortunate
station in the sunshine of the Imperial court; and he dreaded their
upstart ambition. which oppressed the metropolitans of Europe and Asia,
invaded the provinces of Antioch and Alexandria, and measured their
diocese by the limits of the empire. The long moderation of Atticus, the
mild usurper of the throne of Chrysostom, suspended the animosities of the
Eastern patriarchs; but Cyril was at length awakened by the exaltation of
a rival more worthy of his esteem and hatred. After the short and troubled
reign of Sisinnius, bishop of Constantinople, the factions of the clergy
and people were appeased by the choice of the emperor, who, on this
occasion, consulted the voice of fame, and invited the merit of a
stranger.</p>
<p>Nestorius, <SPAN href="#link47note-30" name="link47noteref-30" id="link47noteref-30">30</SPAN> native of Germanicia, and a monk of Antioch,
was recommended by the austerity of his life, and the eloquence of his
sermons; but the first homily which he preached before the devout
Theodosius betrayed the acrimony and impatience of his zeal. "Give me, O
Caesar!" he exclaimed, "give me the earth purged of heretics, and I will
give you in exchange the kingdom of heaven. Exterminate with me the
heretics; and with you I will exterminate the Persians." On the fifth day
as if the treaty had been already signed, the patriarch of Constantinople
discovered, surprised, and attacked a secret conventicle of the Arians:
they preferred death to submission; the flames that were kindled by their
despair, soon spread to the neighboring houses, and the triumph of
Nestorius was clouded by the name of incendiary. On either side of the
Hellespont his episcopal vigor imposed a rigid formulary of faith and
discipline; a chronological error concerning the festival of Easter was
punished as an offence against the church and state. Lydia and Caria,
Sardes and Miletus, were purified with the blood of the obstinate
Quartodecimans; and the edict of the emperor, or rather of the patriarch,
enumerates three-and-twenty degrees and denominations in the guilt and
punishment of heresy. <SPAN href="#link47note-31" name="link47noteref-31" id="link47noteref-31">31</SPAN> But the sword of persecution which Nestorius
so furiously wielded was soon turned against his own breast. Religion was
the pretence; but, in the judgment of a contemporary saint, ambition was
the genuine motive of episcopal warfare. <SPAN href="#link47note-32"
name="link47noteref-32" id="link47noteref-32">32</SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN name="link47note-28" id="link47note-28">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
28 (<SPAN href="#link47noteref-28">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ He was deaf to the
entreaties of Atticus of Constantinople, and of Isidore of Pelusium, and
yielded only (if we may believe Nicephorus, l. xiv. c. 18) to the personal
intercession of the Virgin. Yet in his last years he still muttered that
John Chrysostom had been justly condemned, (Tillemont, Mem. Eccles. tom.
xiv. p. 278—282. Baronius Annal. Eccles. A.D. 412, No. 46—64.)]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link47note-29" id="link47note-29">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
29 (<SPAN href="#link47noteref-29">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ See their characters in
the history of Socrates, (l. vii. c. 25—28;) their power and
pretensions, in the huge compilation of Thomassin, (Discipline de
l'Eglise, tom. i. p. 80-91.)]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link47note-30" id="link47note-30">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
30 (<SPAN href="#link47noteref-30">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ His elevation and
conduct are described by Socrates, (l. vii. c. 29 31;) and Marcellinus
seems to have applied the eloquentiae satis, sapi entiae parum, of
Sallust.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link47note-31" id="link47note-31">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
31 (<SPAN href="#link47noteref-31">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Cod. Theodos. l. xvi.
tit. v. leg. 65, with the illustrations of Baronius, (A.D. 428, No. 25,
&c.,) Godefroy, (ad locum,) and Pagi, Critica, (tom. ii. p. 208.)]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link47note-32" id="link47note-32">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
32 (<SPAN href="#link47noteref-32">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Isidore of Pelusium,
(l. iv. Epist. 57.) His words are strong and scandalous. Isidore is a
saint, but he never became a bishop; and I half suspect that the pride of
Diogenes trampled on the pride of Plato.]</p>
<p>In the Syrian school, Nestorius had been taught to abhor the confusion of
the two natures, and nicely to discriminate the humanity of his master
Christ from the divinity of the Lord Jesus. <SPAN href="#link47note-33"
name="link47noteref-33" id="link47noteref-33">33</SPAN> The Blessed Virgin he
revered as the mother of Christ, but his ears were offended with the rash
and recent title of mother of God, <SPAN href="#link47note-34"
name="link47noteref-34" id="link47noteref-34">34</SPAN> which had been
insensibly adopted since the origin of the Arian controversy. From the
pulpit of Constantinople, a friend of the patriarch, and afterwards the
patriarch himself, repeatedly preached against the use, or the abuse, of a
word <SPAN href="#link47note-35" name="link47noteref-35" id="link47noteref-35">35</SPAN>
unknown to the apostles, unauthorized by the church, and which could only
tend to alarm the timorous, to mislead the simple, to amuse the profane,
and to justify, by a seeming resemblance, the old genealogy of Olympus. <SPAN href="#link47note-36" name="link47noteref-36" id="link47noteref-36">36</SPAN>
In his calmer moments Nestorius confessed, that it might be tolerated or
excused by the union of the two natures, and the communication of their
idioms: <SPAN href="#link47note-37" name="link47noteref-37" id="link47noteref-37">37</SPAN> but he was exasperated, by contradiction, to
disclaim the worship of a new-born, an infant Deity, to draw his
inadequate similes from the conjugal or civil partnerships of life, and to
describe the manhood of Christ as the robe, the instrument, the tabernacle
of his Godhead. At these blasphemous sounds, the pillars of the sanctuary
were shaken. The unsuccessful competitors of Nestorius indulged their
pious or personal resentment, the Byzantine clergy was secretly displeased
with the intrusion of a stranger: whatever is superstitious or absurd,
might claim the protection of the monks; and the people were interested in
the glory of their virgin patroness. <SPAN href="#link47note-38"
name="link47noteref-38" id="link47noteref-38">38</SPAN> The sermons of the
archbishop, and the service of the altar, were disturbed by seditious
clamor; his authority and doctrine were renounced by separate
congregations; every wind scattered round the empire the leaves of
controversy; and the voice of the combatants on a sonorous theatre
reechoed in the cells of Palestine and Egypt. It was the duty of Cyril to
enlighten the zeal and ignorance of his innumerable monks: in the school
of Alexandria, he had imbibed and professed the incarnation of one nature;
and the successor of Athanasius consulted his pride and ambition, when he
rose in arms against another Arius, more formidable and more guilty, on
the second throne of the hierarchy. After a short correspondence, in which
the rival prelates disguised their hatred in the hollow language of
respect and charity, the patriarch of Alexandria denounced to the prince
and people, to the East and to the West, the damnable errors of the
Byzantine pontiff. From the East, more especially from Antioch, he
obtained the ambiguous counsels of toleration and silence, which were
addressed to both parties while they favored the cause of Nestorius. But
the Vatican received with open arms the messengers of Egypt. The vanity of
Celestine was flattered by the appeal; and the partial version of a monk
decided the faith of the pope, who with his Latin clergy was ignorant of
the language, the arts, and the theology of the Greeks. At the head of an
Italian synod, Celestine weighed the merits of the cause, approved the
creed of Cyril, condemned the sentiments and person of Nestorius, degraded
the heretic from his episcopal dignity, allowed a respite of ten days for
recantation and penance, and delegated to his enemy the execution of this
rash and illegal sentence. But the patriarch of Alexandria, while he
darted the thunders of a god, exposed the errors and passions of a mortal;
and his twelve anathemas <SPAN href="#link47note-39" name="link47noteref-39" id="link47noteref-39">39</SPAN> still torture the orthodox slaves, who adore
the memory of a saint, without forfeiting their allegiance to the synod of
Chalcedon. These bold assertions are indelibly tinged with the colors of
the Apollinarian heresy; but the serious, and perhaps the sincere
professions of Nestorius have satisfied the wiser and less partial
theologians of the present times. <SPAN href="#link47note-40"
name="link47noteref-40" id="link47noteref-40">40</SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN name="link47note-33" id="link47note-33">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
33 (<SPAN href="#link47noteref-33">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ La Croze (Christianisme
des Indes, tom. i. p. 44-53. Thesaurus Epistolicus, La Crozianus, tom.
iii. p. 276—280) has detected the use, which, in the ivth, vth, and
vith centuries, discriminates the school of Diodorus of Tarsus and his
Nestorian disciples.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link47note-34" id="link47note-34">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
34 (<SPAN href="#link47noteref-34">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Deipara; as in zoology
we familiarly speak of oviparous and viviparous animals. It is not easy to
fix the invention of this word, which La Croze (Christianisme des Indes,
tom. i. p. 16) ascribes to Eusebius of Caesarea and the Arians. The
orthodox testimonies are produced by Cyril and Petavius, (Dogmat. Theolog.
tom. v. l. v. c. 15, p. 254, &c.;) but the veracity of the saint is
questionable, and the epithet so easily slides from the margin to the text
of a Catholic Ms]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link47note-35" id="link47note-35">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
35 (<SPAN href="#link47noteref-35">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Basnage, in his
Histoire de l'Eglise, a work of controversy, (tom l. p. 505,) justifies
the mother, by the blood, of God, (Acts, xx. 28, with Mill's various
readings.) But the Greek Mss. are far from unanimous; and the primitive
style of the blood of Christ is preserved in the Syriac version, even in
those copies which were used by the Christians of St. Thomas on the coast
of Malabar, (La Croze, Christianisme des Indes, tom. i. p. 347.) The
jealousy of the Nestorians and Monophysites has guarded the purity of
their text.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link47note-36" id="link47note-36">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
36 (<SPAN href="#link47noteref-36">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ The Pagans of Egypt
already laughed at the new Cybele of the Christians, (Isidor. l. i. epist.
54;) a letter was forged in the name of Hypatia, to ridicule the theology
of her assassin, (Synodicon, c. 216, in iv. tom. Concil. p. 484.) In the
article of Nestorius, Bayle has scattered some loose philosophy on the
worship of the Virgin Mary.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link47note-37" id="link47note-37">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
37 (<SPAN href="#link47noteref-37">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ The item of the Greeks,
a mutual loan or transfer of the idioms or properties of each nature to
the other—of infinity to man, passibility to God, &c. Twelve
rules on this nicest of subjects compose the Theological Grammar of
Petavius, (Dogmata Theolog. tom. v. l. iv. c. 14, 15, p 209, &c.)]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link47note-38" id="link47note-38">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
38 (<SPAN href="#link47noteref-38">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ See Ducange, C. P.
Christiana, l. i. p. 30, &c.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link47note-39" id="link47note-39">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
39 (<SPAN href="#link47noteref-39">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Concil. tom. iii. p.
943. They have never been directly approved by the church, (Tillemont.
Mem. Eccles. tom. xiv. p. 368—372.) I almost pity the agony of rage
and sophistry with which Petavius seems to be agitated in the vith book of
his Dogmata Theologica]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link47note-40" id="link47note-40">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
40 (<SPAN href="#link47noteref-40">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Such as the rational
Basnage (ad tom. i. Variar. Lection. Canisine in Praefat. c. 2, p. 11—23)
and La Croze, the universal scholar, (Christianisme des Indes, tom. i. p.
16—20. De l'Ethiopie, p. 26, 27. The saur. Epist. p. 176, &c.,
283, 285.) His free sentence is confirmed by that of his friends Jablonski
(Thesaur. Epist. tom. i. p. 193—201) and Mosheim, (idem. p. 304,
Nestorium crimine caruisse est et mea sententia;) and three more
respectable judges will not easily be found. Asseman, a learned and modest
slave, can hardly discern (Bibliothec. Orient. tom. iv. p. 190—224)
the guilt and error of the Nestorians.]</p>
<p>Yet neither the emperor nor the primate of the East were disposed to obey
the mandate of an Italian priest; and a synod of the Catholic, or rather
of the Greek church, was unanimously demanded as the sole remedy that
could appease or decide this ecclesiastical quarrel. <SPAN href="#link47note-41" name="link47noteref-41" id="link47noteref-41">41</SPAN>
Ephesus, on all sides accessible by sea and land, was chosen for the
place, the festival of Pentecost for the day, of the meeting; a writ of
summons was despatched to each metropolitan, and a guard was stationed to
protect and confine the fathers till they should settle the mysteries of
heaven, and the faith of the earth. Nestorius appeared not as a criminal,
but as a judge; he depended on the weight rather than the number of his
prelates, and his sturdy slaves from the baths of Zeuxippus were armed for
every service of injury or defence. But his adversary Cyril was more
powerful in the weapons both of the flesh and of the spirit. Disobedient
to the letter, or at least to the meaning, of the royal summons, he was
attended by fifty Egyptian bishops, who expected from their patriarch's
nod the inspiration of the Holy Ghost. He had contracted an intimate
alliance with Memnon, bishop of Ephesus. The despotic primate of Asia
disposed of the ready succors of thirty or forty episcopal votes: a crowd
of peasants, the slaves of the church, was poured into the city to support
with blows and clamors a metaphysical argument; and the people zealously
asserted the honor of the Virgin, whose body reposed within the walls of
Ephesus. <SPAN href="#link47note-42" name="link47noteref-42" id="link47noteref-42">42</SPAN> The fleet which had transported Cyril from
Alexandria was laden with the riches of Egypt; and he disembarked a
numerous body of mariners, slaves, and fanatics, enlisted with blind
obedience under the banner of St. Mark and the mother of God. The fathers,
and even the guards, of the council were awed by this martial array; the
adversaries of Cyril and Mary were insulted in the streets, or threatened
in their houses; his eloquence and liberality made a daily increase in the
number of his adherents; and the Egyptian soon computed that he might
command the attendance and the voices of two hundred bishops. <SPAN href="#link47note-43" name="link47noteref-43" id="link47noteref-43">43</SPAN>
But the author of the twelve anathemas foresaw and dreaded the opposition
of John of Antioch, who, with a small, but respectable, train of
metropolitans and divines, was advancing by slow journeys from the distant
capital of the East. Impatient of a delay, which he stigmatized as
voluntary and culpable, <SPAN href="#link47note-44" name="link47noteref-44" id="link47noteref-44">44</SPAN> Cyril announced the opening of the synod
sixteen days after the festival of Pentecost. Nestorius, who depended on
the near approach of his Eastern friends, persisted, like his predecessor
Chrysostom, to disclaim the jurisdiction, and to disobey the summons, of
his enemies: they hastened his trial, and his accuser presided in the seat
of judgment. Sixty-eight bishops, twenty-two of metropolitan rank,
defended his cause by a modest and temperate protest: they were excluded
from the councils of their brethren. Candidian, in the emperor's name,
requested a delay of four days; the profane magistrate was driven with
outrage and insult from the assembly of the saints. The whole of this
momentous transaction was crowded into the compass of a summer's day: the
bishops delivered their separate opinions; but the uniformity of style
reveals the influence or the hand of a master, who has been accused of
corrupting the public evidence of their acts and subscriptions. <SPAN href="#link47note-45" name="link47noteref-45" id="link47noteref-45">45</SPAN>
Without a dissenting voice, they recognized in the epistles of Cyril the
Nicene creed and the doctrine of the fathers: but the partial extracts
from the letters and homilies of Nestorius were interrupted by curses and
anathemas: and the heretic was degraded from his episcopal and
ecclesiastical dignity. The sentence, maliciously inscribed to the new
Judas, was affixed and proclaimed in the streets of Ephesus: the weary
prelates, as they issued from the church of the mother of God, were
saluted as her champions; and her victory was celebrated by the
illuminations, the songs, and the tumult of the night.</p>
<p><SPAN name="link47note-41" id="link47note-41">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
41 (<SPAN href="#link47noteref-41">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ The origin and progress
of the Nestorian controversy, till the synod of Ephesus, may be found in
Socrates, (l. vii. c. 32,) Evagrius, (l. i. c. 1, 2,) Liberatus, (Brev. c.
1—4,) the original Acts, (Concil. tom. iii. p. 551—991, edit.
Venice, 1728,) the Annals of Baronius and Pagi, and the faithful
collections of Tillemont, (Mem. Eccles. tom. xiv p. 283—377.)]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link47note-42" id="link47note-42">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
42 (<SPAN href="#link47noteref-42">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ The Christians of the
four first centuries were ignorant of the death and burial of Mary. The
tradition of Ephesus is affirmed by the synod, (Concil. tom. iii. p.
1102;) yet it has been superseded by the claim of Jerusalem; and her empty
sepulchre, as it was shown to the pilgrims, produced the fable of her
resurrection and assumption, in which the Greek and Latin churches have
piously acquiesced. See Baronius (Annal. Eccles. A.D. 48, No. 6, &c.)
and Tillemont, (Mem. Eccles. tom. i. p. 467—477.)]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link47note-43" id="link47note-43">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
43 (<SPAN href="#link47noteref-43">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ The Acts of Chalcedon
(Concil. tom. iv. p. 1405, 1408) exhibit a lively picture of the blind,
obstinate servitude of the bishops of Egypt to their patriarch.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link47note-44" id="link47note-44">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
44 (<SPAN href="#link47noteref-44">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Civil or ecclesiastical
business detained the bishops at Antioch till the 18th of May. Ephesus was
at the distance of thirty days' journey; and ten days more may be fairly
allowed for accidents and repose. The march of Xenophon over the same
ground enumerates above 260 parasangs or leagues; and this measure might
be illustrated from ancient and modern itineraries, if I knew how to
compare the speed of an army, a synod, and a caravan. John of Antioch is
reluctantly acquitted by Tillemont himself, (Mem. Eccles. tom. xiv. p. 386—389.)]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link47note-45" id="link47note-45">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
45 (<SPAN href="#link47noteref-45">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Evagrius, l. i. c. 7.
The same imputation was urged by Count Irenaeus, (tom. iii. p. 1249;) and
the orthodox critics do not find it an easy task to defend the purity of
the Greek or Latin copies of the Acts.]</p>
<p>On the fifth day, the triumph was clouded by the arrival and indignation
of the Eastern bishops. In a chamber of the inn, before he had wiped the
dust from his shoes, John of Antioch gave audience to Candidian, the
Imperial minister; who related his ineffectual efforts to prevent or to
annul the hasty violence of the Egyptian. With equal haste and violence,
the Oriental synod of fifty bishops degraded Cyril and Memnon from their
episcopal honors, condemned, in the twelve anathemas, the purest venom of
the Apollinarian heresy, and described the Alexandrian primate as a
monster, born and educated for the destruction of the church. <SPAN href="#link47note-46" name="link47noteref-46" id="link47noteref-46">46</SPAN>
His throne was distant and inaccessible; but they instantly resolved to
bestow on the flock of Ephesus the blessing of a faithful shepherd. By the
vigilance of Memnon, the churches were shut against them, and a strong
garrison was thrown into the cathedral. The troops, under the command of
Candidian, advanced to the assault; the outguards were routed and put to
the sword, but the place was impregnable: the besiegers retired; their
retreat was pursued by a vigorous sally; they lost their horses, and many
of their soldiers were dangerously wounded with clubs and stones. Ephesus,
the city of the Virgin, was defiled with rage and clamor, with sedition
and blood; the rival synods darted anathemas and excommunications from
their spiritual engines; and the court of Theodosius was perplexed by the
adverse and contradictory narratives of the Syrian and Egyptian factions.
During a busy period of three months, the emperor tried every method,
except the most effectual means of indifference and contempt, to reconcile
this theological quarrel. He attempted to remove or intimidate the leaders
by a common sentence, of acquittal or condemnation; he invested his
representatives at Ephesus with ample power and military force; he
summoned from either party eight chosen deputies to a free and candid
conference in the neighborhood of the capital, far from the contagion of
popular frenzy. But the Orientals refused to yield, and the Catholics,
proud of their numbers and of their Latin allies, rejected all terms of
union or toleration. The patience of the meek Theodosius was provoked; and
he dissolved in anger this episcopal tumult, which at the distance of
thirteen centuries assumes the venerable aspect of the third oecumenical
council. <SPAN href="#link47note-47" name="link47noteref-47" id="link47noteref-47">47</SPAN> "God is my witness," said the pious prince,
"that I am not the author of this confusion. His providence will discern
and punish the guilty. Return to your provinces, and may your private
virtues repair the mischief and scandal of your meeting." They returned to
their provinces; but the same passions which had distracted the synod of
Ephesus were diffused over the Eastern world. After three obstinate and
equal campaigns, John of Antioch and Cyril of Alexandria condescended to
explain and embrace: but their seeming reunion must be imputed rather to
prudence than to reason, to the mutual lassitude rather than to the
Christian charity of the patriarchs.</p>
<p><SPAN name="link47note-46" id="link47note-46">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
46 (<SPAN href="#link47noteref-46">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ After the coalition of
John and Cyril these invectives were mutually forgotten. The style of
declamation must never be confounded with the genuine sense which
respectable enemies entertain of each other's merit, (Concil tom. iii. p.
1244.)]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link47note-47" id="link47note-47">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
47 (<SPAN href="#link47noteref-47">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ See the acts of the
synod of Ephesus in the original Greek, and a Latin version almost
contemporary, (Concil. tom. iii. p. 991—1339, with the Synodicon
adversus Tragoediam Irenaei, tom. iv. p. 235—497,) the
Ecclesiastical Histories of Socrates (l. vii. c. 34) and Evagrius, (l i.
c. 3, 4, 5,) and the Breviary of Liberatus, (in Concil. tom. vi. p. 419—459,
c. 5, 6,) and the Memoires Eccles. of Tillemont, (tom. xiv p. 377-487.)]</p>
<p>The Byzantine pontiff had instilled into the royal ear a baleful prejudice
against the character and conduct of his Egyptian rival. An epistle of
menace and invective, <SPAN href="#link47note-48" name="link47noteref-48" id="link47noteref-48">48</SPAN> which accompanied the summons, accused him as
a busy, insolent, and envious priest, who perplexed the simplicity of the
faith, violated the peace of the church and state, and, by his artful and
separate addresses to the wife and sister of Theodosius, presumed to
suppose, or to scatter, the seeds of discord in the Imperial family. At
the stern command of his sovereign. Cyril had repaired to Ephesus, where
he was resisted, threatened, and confined, by the magistrates in the
interest of Nestorius and the Orientals; who assembled the troops of Lydia
and Ionia to suppress the fanatic and disorderly train of the patriarch.
Without expecting the royal license, he escaped from his guards,
precipitately embarked, deserted the imperfect synod, and retired to his
episcopal fortress of safety and independence. But his artful emissaries,
both in the court and city, successfully labored to appease the
resentment, and to conciliate the favor, of the emperor. The feeble son of
Arcadius was alternately swayed by his wife and sister, by the eunuchs and
women of the palace: superstition and avarice were their ruling passions;
and the orthodox chiefs were assiduous in their endeavors to alarm the
former, and to gratify the latter. Constantinople and the suburbs were
sanctified with frequent monasteries, and the holy abbots, Dalmatius and
Eutyches, <SPAN href="#link47note-49" name="link47noteref-49" id="link47noteref-49">49</SPAN> had devoted their zeal and fidelity to the
cause of Cyril, the worship of Mary, and the unity of Christ. From the
first moment of their monastic life, they had never mingled with the
world, or trod the profane ground of the city. But in this awful moment of
the danger of the church, their vow was superseded by a more sublime and
indispensable duty. At the head of a long order of monks and hermits, who
carried burning tapers in their hands, and chanted litanies to the mother
of God, they proceeded from their monasteries to the palace. The people
was edified and inflamed by this extraordinary spectacle, and the
trembling monarch listened to the prayers and adjurations of the saints,
who boldly pronounced, that none could hope for salvation, unless they
embraced the person and the creed of the orthodox successor of Athanasius.
At the same time, every avenue of the throne was assaulted with gold.
Under the decent names of eulogies and benedictions, the courtiers of both
sexes were bribed according to the measure of their power and
rapaciousness. But their incessant demands despoiled the sanctuaries of
Constantinople and Alexandria; and the authority of the patriarch was
unable to silence the just murmur of his clergy, that a debt of sixty
thousand pounds had already been contracted to support the expense of this
scandalous corruption. <SPAN href="#link47note-50" name="link47noteref-50" id="link47noteref-50">50</SPAN> Pulcheria, who relieved her brother from the
weight of an empire, was the firmest pillar of orthodoxy; and so intimate
was the alliance between the thunders of the synod and the whispers of the
court, that Cyril was assured of success if he could displace one eunuch,
and substitute another in the favor of Theodosius. Yet the Egyptian could
not boast of a glorious or decisive victory. The emperor, with
unaccustomed firmness, adhered to his promise of protecting the innocence
of the Oriental bishops; and Cyril softened his anathemas, and confessed,
with ambiguity and reluctance, a twofold nature of Christ, before he was
permitted to satiate his revenge against the unfortunate Nestorius. <SPAN href="#link47note-51" name="link47noteref-51" id="link47noteref-51">51</SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN name="link47note-48" id="link47note-48">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
48 (<SPAN href="#link47noteref-48">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ I should be curious to
know how much Nestorius paid for these expressions, so mortifying to his
rival.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link47note-49" id="link47note-49">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
49 (<SPAN href="#link47noteref-49">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Eutyches, the
heresiarch Eutyches, is honorably named by Cyril as a friend, a saint, and
the strenuous defender of the faith. His brother, the abbot Dalmatus, is
likewise employed to bind the emperor and all his chamberlains terribili
conjuratione. Synodicon. c. 203, in Concil. tom. iv p. 467.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link47note-50" id="link47note-50">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
50 (<SPAN href="#link47noteref-50">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Clerici qui hic sunt
contristantur, quod ecclesia Alexandrina nudata sit hujus causa turbelae:
et debet praeter illa quae hinc transmissa sint auri libras mille
quingentas. Et nunc ei scriptum est ut praestet; sed de tua ecclesia
praesta avaritiae quorum nosti, &c. This curious and original letter,
from Cyril's archdeacon to his creature the new bishop of Constantinople,
has been unaccountably preserved in an old Latin version, (Synodicon, c.
203, Concil. tom. iv. p. 465—468.) The mask is almost dropped, and
the saints speak the honest language of interest and confederacy.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link47note-51" id="link47note-51">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
51 (<SPAN href="#link47noteref-51">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ The tedious
negotiations that succeeded the synod of Ephesus are diffusely related in
the original acts, (Concil. tom. iii. p. 1339—1771, ad fin. vol. and
the Synodicon, in tom. iv.,) Socrates, (l. vii. c. 28, 35, 40, 41,)
Evagrius, (l. i. c. 6, 7, 8, 12,) Liberatus, (c. 7—10, 7-10,)
Tillemont, (Mem. Eccles. tom. xiv. p. 487—676.) The most patient
reader will thank me for compressing so much nonsense and falsehood in a
few lines.]</p>
<p>The rash and obstinate Nestorius, before the end of the synod, was
oppressed by Cyril, betrayed by the court, and faintly supported by his
Eastern friends. A sentiment or fear or indignation prompted him, while it
was yet time, to affect the glory of a voluntary abdication: <SPAN href="#link47note-52" name="link47noteref-52" id="link47noteref-52">52</SPAN>
his wish, or at least his request, was readily granted; he was conducted
with honor from Ephesus to his old monastery of Antioch; and, after a
short pause, his successors, Maximian and Proclus, were acknowledged as
the lawful bishops of Constantinople. But in the silence of his cell, the
degraded patriarch could no longer resume the innocence and security of a
private monk. The past he regretted, he was discontented with the present,
and the future he had reason to dread: the Oriental bishops successively
disengaged their cause from his unpopular name, and each day decreased the
number of the schismatics who revered Nestorius as the confessor of the
faith. After a residence at Antioch of four years, the hand of Theodosius
subscribed an edict, <SPAN href="#link47note-53" name="link47noteref-53" id="link47noteref-53">53</SPAN> which ranked him with Simon the magician,
proscribed his opinions and followers, condemned his writings to the
flames, and banished his person first to Petra, in Arabia, and at length
to Oasis, one of the islands of the Libyan desert. <SPAN href="#link47note-54"
name="link47noteref-54" id="link47noteref-54">54</SPAN> Secluded from the
church and from the world, the exile was still pursued by the rage of
bigotry and war. A wandering tribe of the Blemmyes or Nubians invaded his
solitary prison: in their retreat they dismissed a crowd of useless
captives: but no sooner had Nestorius reached the banks of the Nile, than
he would gladly have escaped from a Roman and orthodox city, to the milder
servitude of the savages. His flight was punished as a new crime: the soul
of the patriarch inspired the civil and ecclesiastical powers of Egypt;
the magistrates, the soldiers, the monks, devoutly tortured the enemy of
Christ and St. Cyril; and, as far as the confines of Aethiopia, the
heretic was alternately dragged and recalled, till his aged body was
broken by the hardships and accidents of these reiterated journeys. Yet
his mind was still independent and erect; the president of Thebais was
awed by his pastoral letters; he survived the Catholic tyrant of
Alexandria, and, after sixteen years' banishment, the synod of Chalcedon
would perhaps have restored him to the honors, or at least to the
communion, of the church. The death of Nestorius prevented his obedience
to their welcome summons; <SPAN href="#link47note-55" name="link47noteref-55" id="link47noteref-55">55</SPAN> and his disease might afford some color to
the scandalous report, that his tongue, the organ of blasphemy, had been
eaten by the worms. He was buried in a city of Upper Egypt, known by the
names of Chemnis, or Panopolis, or Akmim; <SPAN href="#link47note-56"
name="link47noteref-56" id="link47noteref-56">56</SPAN> but the immortal
malice of the Jacobites has persevered for ages to cast stones against his
sepulchre, and to propagate the foolish tradition, that it was never
watered by the rain of heaven, which equally descends on the righteous and
the ungodly. <SPAN href="#link47note-57" name="link47noteref-57" id="link47noteref-57">57</SPAN> Humanity may drop a tear on the fate of
Nestorius; yet justice must observe, that he suffered the persecution
which he had approved and inflicted. <SPAN href="#link47note-58"
name="link47noteref-58" id="link47noteref-58">58</SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN name="link47note-52" id="link47note-52">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
52 (<SPAN href="#link47noteref-52">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Evagrius, l. i. c. 7.
The original letters in the Synodicon (c. 15, 24, 25, 26) justify the
appearance of a voluntary resignation, which is asserted by Ebed-Jesu, a
Nestorian writer, apud Asseman. Bibliot. Oriental. tom. iii. p. 299, 302.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link47note-53" id="link47note-53">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
53 (<SPAN href="#link47noteref-53">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ See the Imperial
letters in the Acts of the Synod of Ephesus, (Concil. tom. iii. p. 1730—1735.)
The odious name of Simonians, which was affixed to the disciples of this.
Yet these were Christians! who differed only in names and in shadows.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link47note-54" id="link47note-54">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
54 (<SPAN href="#link47noteref-54">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ The metaphor of islands
is applied by the grave civilians (Pandect. l. xlviii. tit. 22, leg. 7) to
those happy spots which are discriminated by water and verdure from the
Libyan sands. Three of these under the common name of Oasis, or Alvahat:
1. The temple of Jupiter Ammon. 2. The middle Oasis, three days' journey
to the west of Lycopolis. 3. The southern, where Nestorius was banished in
the first climate, and only three days' journey from the confines of
Nubia. See a learned note of Michaelis, (ad Descript. Aegypt. Abulfedae,
p. 21-34.) * Note: 1. The Oasis of Sivah has been visited by Mons.
Drovetti and Mr. Browne. 2. The little Oasis, that of El Kassar, was
visited and described by Belzoni. 3. The great Oasis, and its splendid
ruins, have been well described in the travels of Sir A. Edmonstone. To
these must be added another Western Oasis also visited by Sir A.
Edmonstone.—M.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link47note-55" id="link47note-55">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
55 (<SPAN href="#link47noteref-55">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ The invitation of
Nestorius to the synod of Chalcedon, is related by Zacharias, bishop of
Melitene (Evagrius, l. ii. c. 2. Asseman. Biblioth. Orient. tom. ii. p.
55,) and the famous Xenaias or Philoxenus, bishop of Hierapolis, (Asseman.
Bibliot. Orient. tom. ii. p. 40, &c.,) denied by Evagrius and Asseman,
and stoutly maintained by La Croze, (Thesaur. Epistol. tom. iii. p. 181,
&c.) The fact is not improbable; yet it was the interest of the
Monophysites to spread the invidious report, and Eutychius (tom. ii. p.
12) affirms, that Nestorius died after an exile of seven years, and
consequently ten years before the synod of Chalcedon.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link47note-56" id="link47note-56">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
56 (<SPAN href="#link47noteref-56">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Consult D'Anville,
(Memoire sur l'Egypte, p. 191,) Pocock. (Description of the East, vol. i.
p. 76,) Abulfeda, (Descript. Aegypt, p. 14,) and his commentator
Michaelis, (Not. p. 78—83,) and the Nubian Geographer, (p. 42,) who
mentions, in the xiith century, the ruins and the sugar-canes of Akmim.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link47note-57" id="link47note-57">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
57 (<SPAN href="#link47noteref-57">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Eutychius (Annal. tom.
ii. p. 12) and Gregory Bar-Hebraeus, of Abulpharagius, (Asseman, tom. ii.
p. 316,) represent the credulity of the xth and xiith centuries.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link47note-58" id="link47note-58">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
58 (<SPAN href="#link47noteref-58">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ We are obliged to
Evagrius (l. i. c. 7) for some extracts from the letters of Nestorius; but
the lively picture of his sufferings is treated with insult by the hard
and stupid fanatic.]</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />