<p><SPAN name="link432HCH0004" id="link432HCH0004"></SPAN></p>
<h2> Chapter XLIII: Last Victory And Death Of Belisarius, Death Of Justinian.—Part IV. </h2>
<p>About two years after the last victory of Belisarius, the emperor returned
from a Thracian journey of health, or business, or devotion. Justinian was
afflicted by a pain in his head; and his private entry countenanced the
rumor of his death. Before the third hour of the day, the bakers' shops
were plundered of their bread, the houses were shut, and every citizen,
with hope or terror, prepared for the impending tumult. The senators
themselves, fearful and suspicious, were convened at the ninth hour; and
the praefect received their commands to visit every quarter of the city,
and proclaim a general illumination for the recovery of the emperor's
health. The ferment subsided; but every accident betrayed the impotence of
the government, and the factious temper of the people: the guards were
disposed to mutiny as often as their quarters were changed, or their pay
was withheld: the frequent calamities of fires and earthquakes afforded
the opportunities of disorder; the disputes of the blues and greens, of
the orthodox and heretics, degenerated into bloody battles; and, in the
presence of the Persian ambassador, Justinian blushed for himself and for
his subjects. Capricious pardon and arbitrary punishment imbittered the
irksomeness and discontent of a long reign: a conspiracy was formed in the
palace; and, unless we are deceived by the names of Marcellus and Sergius,
the most virtuous and the most profligate of the courtiers were associated
in the same designs. They had fixed the time of the execution; their rank
gave them access to the royal banquet; and their black slaves <SPAN href="#link43note-65" name="link43noteref-65" id="link43noteref-65">65</SPAN>
were stationed in the vestibule and porticos, to announce the death of the
tyrant, and to excite a sedition in the capital. But the indiscretion of
an accomplice saved the poor remnant of the days of Justinian. The
conspirators were detected and seized, with daggers hidden under their
garments: Marcellus died by his own hand, and Sergius was dragged from the
sanctuary. <SPAN href="#link43note-66" name="link43noteref-66" id="link43noteref-66">66</SPAN> Pressed by remorse, or tempted by the hopes
of safety, he accused two officers of the household of Belisarius; and
torture forced them to declare that they had acted according to the secret
instructions of their patron. <SPAN href="#link43note-67"
name="link43noteref-67" id="link43noteref-67">67</SPAN> Posterity will not
hastily believe that a hero who, in the vigor of life, had disdained the
fairest offers of ambition and revenge, should stoop to the murder of his
prince, whom he could not long expect to survive. His followers were
impatient to fly; but flight must have been supported by rebellion, and he
had lived enough for nature and for glory. Belisarius appeared before the
council with less fear than indignation: after forty years' service, the
emperor had prejudged his guilt; and injustice was sanctified by the
presence and authority of the patriarch. The life of Belisarius was
graciously spared; but his fortunes were sequestered, and, from December
to July, he was guarded as a prisoner in his own palace. At length his
innocence was acknowledged; his freedom and honor were restored; and
death, which might be hastened by resentment and grief, removed him from
the world in about eight months after his deliverance. The name of
Belisarius can never die but instead of the funeral, the monuments, the
statues, so justly due to his memory, I only read, that his treasures, the
spoil of the Goths and Vandals, were immediately confiscated by the
emperor. Some decent portion was reserved, however for the use of his
widow: and as Antonina had much to repent, she devoted the last remains of
her life and fortune to the foundation of a convent. Such is the simple
and genuine narrative of the fall of Belisarius and the ingratitude of
Justinian. <SPAN href="#link43note-68" name="link43noteref-68" id="link43noteref-68">68</SPAN> That he was deprived of his eyes, and reduced
by envy to beg his bread, <SPAN href="#link43note-6811"
name="link43noteref-6811" id="link43noteref-6811">6811</SPAN> "Give a penny
to Belisarius the general!" is a fiction of later times, <SPAN href="#link43note-69" name="link43noteref-69" id="link43noteref-69">69</SPAN>
which has obtained credit, or rather favor, as a strange example of the
vicissitudes of fortune. <SPAN href="#link43note-70" name="link43noteref-70" id="link43noteref-70">70</SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN name="link43note-65" id="link43note-65">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
65 (<SPAN href="#link43noteref-65">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ They could scarcely be
real Indians; and the Aethiopians, sometimes known by that name, were
never used by the ancients as guards or followers: they were the trifling,
though costly objects of female and royal luxury, (Terent. Eunuch. act. i.
scene ii Sueton. in August. c. 83, with a good note of Casaubon, in
Caligula, c. 57.)]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link43note-66" id="link43note-66">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
66 (<SPAN href="#link43noteref-66">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ The Sergius (Vandal. l.
ii. c. 21, 22, Anecdot. c. 5) and Marcellus (Goth. l. iii. c. 32) are
mentioned by Procopius. See Theophanes, p. 197, 201. * Note: Some words,
"the acts of," or "the crimes cf," appear to have false from the text. The
omission is in all the editions I have consulted.—M.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link43note-67" id="link43note-67">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
67 (<SPAN href="#link43noteref-67">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Alemannus, (p. quotes
an old Byzantian Ms., which has been printed in the Imperium Orientale of
Banduri.)]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link43note-68" id="link43note-68">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
68 (<SPAN href="#link43noteref-68">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Of the disgrace and
restoration of Belisarius, the genuine original record is preserved in the
Fragment of John Malala (tom. ii. p. 234—243) and the exact
Chronicle of Theophanes, (p. 194—204.) Cedrenus (Compend. p. 387,
388) and Zonaras (tom. ii. l. xiv. p. 69) seem to hesitate between the
obsolete truth and the growing falsehood.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link43note-6811" id="link43note-6811">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
6811 (<SPAN href="#link43noteref-6811">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Le Beau, following
Allemannus, conceives that Belisarius was confounded with John of
Cappadocia, who was thus reduced to beggary, (vol. ix. p. 58, 449.) Lord
Mahon has, with considerable learning, and on the authority of a yet
unquoted writer of the eleventh century, endeavored to reestablish the old
tradition. I cannot acknowledge that I have been convinced, and am
inclined to subscribe to the theory of Le Beau.—M.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link43note-69" id="link43note-69">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
69 (<SPAN href="#link43noteref-69">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ The source of this idle
fable may be derived from a miscellaneous work of the xiith century, the
Chiliads of John Tzetzes, a monk, (Basil. 1546, ad calcem Lycophront.
Colon. Allobrog. 1614, in Corp. Poet. Graec.) He relates the blindness and
beggary of Belisarius in ten vulgar or political verses, (Chiliad iii. No.
88, 339—348, in Corp. Poet. Graec. tom. ii. p. 311.) This moral or
romantic tale was imported into Italy with the language and manuscripts of
Greece; repeated before the end of the xvth century by Crinitus, Pontanus,
and Volaterranus, attacked by Alciat, for the honor of the law; and
defended by Baronius, (A.D. 561, No. 2, &c.,) for the honor of the
church. Yet Tzetzes himself had read in other chronicles, that Belisarius
did not lose his sight, and that he recovered his fame and fortunes. *
Note: I know not where Gibbon found Tzetzes to be a monk; I suppose he
considered his bad verses a proof of his monachism. Compare to Gerbelius
in Kiesling's edition of Tzetzes.—M.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link43note-70" id="link43note-70">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
70 (<SPAN href="#link43noteref-70">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ The statue in the villa
Borghese at Rome, in a sitting posture, with an open hand, which is
vulgarly given to Belisarius, may be ascribed with more dignity to
Augustus in the act of propitiating Nemesis, (Winckelman, Hist. de l'Art,
tom. iii. p. 266.) Ex nocturno visu etiam stipem, quotannis, die certo,
emendicabat a populo, cavana manum asses porrigentibus praebens, (Sueton.
in August. c. 91, with an excellent note of Casaubon.) * Note: Lord Mahon
abandons the statue, as altogether irreconcilable with the state of the
arts at this period, (p. 472.)—M.]</p>
<p>If the emperor could rejoice in the death of Belisarius, he enjoyed the
base satisfaction only eight months, the last period of a reign of
thirty-eight years, and a life of eighty-three years. It would be
difficult to trace the character of a prince who is not the most
conspicuous object of his own times: but the confessions of an enemy may
be received as the safest evidence of his virtues. The resemblance of
Justinian to the bust of Domitian, is maliciously urged; <SPAN href="#link43note-71" name="link43noteref-71" id="link43noteref-71">71</SPAN>
with the acknowledgment, however, of a well-proportioned figure, a ruddy
complexion, and a pleasing countenance. The emperor was easy of access,
patient of hearing, courteous and affable in discourse, and a master of
the angry passions which rage with such destructive violence in the breast
of a despot. Procopius praises his temper, to reproach him with calm and
deliberate cruelty: but in the conspiracies which attacked his authority
and person, a more candid judge will approve the justice, or admire the
clemency, of Justinian. He excelled in the private virtues of chastity and
temperance: but the impartial love of beauty would have been less
mischievous than his conjugal tenderness for Theodora; and his abstemious
diet was regulated, not by the prudence of a philosopher, but the
superstition of a monk. His repasts were short and frugal: on solemn
fasts, he contented himself with water and vegetables; and such was his
strength, as well as fervor, that he frequently passed two days, and as
many nights, without tasting any food. The measure of his sleep was not
less rigorous: after the repose of a single hour, the body was awakened by
the soul, and, to the astonishment of his chamberlain, Justinian walked or
studied till the morning light. Such restless application prolonged his
time for the acquisition of knowledge <SPAN href="#link43note-72"
name="link43noteref-72" id="link43noteref-72">72</SPAN> and the despatch of
business; and he might seriously deserve the reproach of confounding, by
minute and preposterous diligence, the general order of his
administration. The emperor professed himself a musician and architect, a
poet and philosopher, a lawyer and theologian; and if he failed in the
enterprise of reconciling the Christian sects, the review of the Roman
jurisprudence is a noble monument of his spirit and industry. In the
government of the empire, he was less wise, or less successful: the age
was unfortunate; the people was oppressed and discontented; Theodora
abused her power; a succession of bad ministers disgraced his judgment;
and Justinian was neither beloved in his life, nor regretted at his death.
The love of fame was deeply implanted in his breast, but he condescended
to the poor ambition of titles, honors, and contemporary praise; and while
he labored to fix the admiration, he forfeited the esteem and affection,
of the Romans.</p>
<p>The design of the African and Italian wars was boldly conceived and
executed; and his penetration discovered the talents of Belisarius in the
camp, of Narses in the palace. But the name of the emperor is eclipsed by
the names of his victorious generals; and Belisarius still lives, to
upbraid the envy and ingratitude of his sovereign. The partial favor of
mankind applauds the genius of a conqueror, who leads and directs his
subjects in the exercise of arms. The characters of Philip the Second and
of Justinian are distinguished by the cold ambition which delights in war,
and declines the dangers of the field. Yet a colossal statue of bronze
represented the emperor on horseback, preparing to march against the
Persians in the habit and armor of Achilles. In the great square before
the church of St. Sophia, this monument was raised on a brass column and a
stone pedestal of seven steps; and the pillar of Theodosius, which weighed
seven thousand four hundred pounds of silver, was removed from the same
place by the avarice and vanity of Justinian. Future princes were more
just or indulgent to his memory; the elder Andronicus, in the beginning of
the fourteenth century, repaired and beautified his equestrian statue:
since the fall of the empire it has been melted into cannon by the
victorious Turks. <SPAN href="#link43note-73" name="link43noteref-73" id="link43noteref-73">73</SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN name="link43note-71" id="link43note-71">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
71 (<SPAN href="#link43noteref-71">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ The rubor of Domitian
is stigmatized, quaintly enough, by the pen of Tacitus, (in Vit. Agricol.
c. 45;) and has been likewise noticed by the younger Pliny, (Panegyr. c.
48,) and Suetonius, (in Domitian, c. 18, and Casaubon ad locum.) Procopius
(Anecdot. c. 8) foolishly believes that only one bust of Domitian had
reached the vith century.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link43note-72" id="link43note-72">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
72 (<SPAN href="#link43noteref-72">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ The studies and science
of Justinian are attested by the confession (Anecdot. c. 8, 13) still more
than by the praises (Gothic. l. iii. c. 31, de Edific. l. i. Proem. c. 7)
of Procopius. Consult the copious index of Alemannus, and read the life of
Justinian by Ludewig, (p. 135—142.)]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link43note-73" id="link43note-73">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
73 (<SPAN href="#link43noteref-73">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ See in the C. P.
Christiana of Ducange (l. i. c. 24, No. 1) a chain of original
testimonies, from Procopius in the vith, to Gyllius in the xvith century.]</p>
<p>I shall conclude this chapter with the comets, the earthquakes, and the
plague, which astonished or afflicted the age of Justinian. I. In the
fifth year of his reign, and in the month of September, a comet <SPAN href="#link43note-74" name="link43noteref-74" id="link43noteref-74">74</SPAN>
was seen during twenty days in the western quarter of the heavens, and
which shot its rays into the north. Eight years afterwards, while the sun
was in Capricorn, another comet appeared to follow in the Sagittary; the
size was gradually increasing; the head was in the east, the tail in the
west, and it remained visible above forty days. The nations, who gazed
with astonishment, expected wars and calamities from their baleful
influence; and these expectations were abundantly fulfilled. The
astronomers dissembled their ignorance of the nature of these blazing
stars, which they affected to represent as the floating meteors of the
air; and few among them embraced the simple notion of Seneca and the
Chaldeans, that they are only planets of a longer period and more
eccentric motion. <SPAN href="#link43note-75" name="link43noteref-75" id="link43noteref-75">75</SPAN> Time and science have justified the
conjectures and predictions of the Roman sage: the telescope has opened
new worlds to the eyes of astronomers; <SPAN href="#link43note-76"
name="link43noteref-76" id="link43noteref-76">76</SPAN> and, in the narrow
space of history and fable, one and the same comet is already found to
have revisited the earth in seven equal revolutions of five hundred and
seventy-five years. The first, <SPAN href="#link43note-77"
name="link43noteref-77" id="link43noteref-77">77</SPAN> which ascends beyond
the Christian aera one thousand seven hundred and sixty-seven years, is
coeval with Ogyges, the father of Grecian antiquity. And this appearance
explains the tradition which Varro has preserved, that under his reign the
planet Venus changed her color, size, figure, and course; a prodigy
without example either in past or succeeding ages. <SPAN href="#link43note-78"
name="link43noteref-78" id="link43noteref-78">78</SPAN> The second visit, in
the year eleven hundred and ninety-three, is darkly implied in the fable
of Electra, the seventh of the Pleiads, who have been reduced to six since
the time of the Trojan war. That nymph, the wife of Dardanus, was unable
to support the ruin of her country: she abandoned the dances of her sister
orbs, fled from the zodiac to the north pole, and obtained, from her
dishevelled locks, the name of the comet. The third period expires in the
year six hundred and eighteen, a date that exactly agrees with the
tremendous comet of the Sibyl, and perhaps of Pliny, which arose in the
West two generations before the reign of Cyrus. The fourth apparition,
forty-four years before the birth of Christ, is of all others the most
splendid and important. After the death of Caesar, a long-haired star was
conspicuous to Rome and to the nations, during the games which were
exhibited by young Octavian in honor of Venus and his uncle. The vulgar
opinion, that it conveyed to heaven the divine soul of the dictator, was
cherished and consecrated by the piety of a statesman; while his secret
superstition referred the comet to the glory of his own times. <SPAN href="#link43note-79" name="link43noteref-79" id="link43noteref-79">79</SPAN>
The fifth visit has been already ascribed to the fifth year of Justinian,
which coincides with the five hundred and thirty-first of the Christian
aera. And it may deserve notice, that in this, as in the preceding
instance, the comet was followed, though at a longer interval, by a
remarkable paleness of the sun. The sixth return, in the year eleven
hundred and six, is recorded by the chronicles of Europe and China: and in
the first fervor of the crusades, the Christians and the Mahometans might
surmise, with equal reason, that it portended the destruction of the
Infidels. The seventh phenomenon, of one thousand six hundred and eighty,
was presented to the eyes of an enlightened age. <SPAN href="#link43note-80"
name="link43noteref-80" id="link43noteref-80">80</SPAN> The philosophy of
Bayle dispelled a prejudice which Milton's muse had so recently adorned,
that the comet, "from its horrid hair shakes pestilence and war." <SPAN href="#link43note-81" name="link43noteref-81" id="link43noteref-81">81</SPAN>
Its road in the heavens was observed with exquisite skill by Flamstead and
Cassini: and the mathematical science of Bernoulli, Newton <SPAN href="#link43note-8111" name="link43noteref-8111" id="link43noteref-8111">8111</SPAN>,
and Halley, investigated the laws of its revolutions. At the eighth
period, in the year two thousand three hundred and fifty-five, their
calculations may perhaps be verified by the astronomers of some future
capital in the Siberian or American wilderness.</p>
<p><SPAN name="link43note-74" id="link43note-74">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
74 (<SPAN href="#link43noteref-74">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ The first comet is
mentioned by John Malala (tom. ii. p. 190, 219) and Theophanes, (p. 154;)
the second by Procopius, (Persic. l. ii. 4.) Yet I strongly suspect their
identity. The paleness of the sun sum Vandal. (l. ii. c. 14) is applied by
Theophanes (p. 158) to a different year. Note: See Lydus de Ostentis,
particularly c 15, in which the author begins to show the signification of
comets according to the part of the heavens in which they appear, and what
fortunes they prognosticate to the Roman empire and their Persian enemies.
The chapter, however, is imperfect. (Edit. Neibuhr, p. 290.)—M.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link43note-75" id="link43note-75">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
75 (<SPAN href="#link43noteref-75">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Seneca's viith book of
Natural Questions displays, in the theory of comets, a philosophic mind.
Yet should we not too candidly confound a vague prediction, a venient
tempus, &c., with the merit of real discoveries.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link43note-76" id="link43note-76">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
76 (<SPAN href="#link43noteref-76">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Astronomers may study
Newton and Halley. I draw my humble science from the article Comete, in
the French Encyclopedie, by M. d'Alembert.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link43note-77" id="link43note-77">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
77 (<SPAN href="#link43noteref-77">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Whiston, the honest,
pious, visionary Whiston, had fancied for the aera of Noah's flood (2242
years before Christ) a prior apparition of the same comet which drowned
the earth with its tail.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link43note-78" id="link43note-78">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
78 (<SPAN href="#link43noteref-78">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ A Dissertation of
Freret (Memoires de l'Academie des Inscriptions, tom. x. p. 357-377)
affords a happy union of philosophy and erudition. The phenomenon in the
time of Ogyges was preserved by Varro, (Apud Augustin. de Civitate Dei,
xxi. 8,) who quotes Castor, Dion of Naples, and Adastrus of Cyzicus—nobiles
mathematici. The two subsequent periods are preserved by the Greek
mythologists and the spurious books of Sibylline verses.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link43note-79" id="link43note-79">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
79 (<SPAN href="#link43noteref-79">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Pliny (Hist. Nat. ii.
23) has transcribed the original memorial of Augustus. Mairan, in his most
ingenious letters to the P. Parennin, missionary in China, removes the
games and the comet of September, from the year 44 to the year 43, before
the Christian aera; but I am not totally subdued by the criticism of the
astronomer, (Opuscules, p. 275 )]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link43note-80" id="link43note-80">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
80 (<SPAN href="#link43noteref-80">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ This last comet was
visible in the month of December, 1680. Bayle, who began his Pensees sur
la Comete in January, 1681, (Oeuvres, tom. iii.,) was forced to argue that
a supernatural comet would have confirmed the ancients in their idolatry.
Bernoulli (see his Eloge, in Fontenelle, tom. v. p. 99) was forced to
allow that the tail though not the head, was a sign of the wrath of God.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link43note-81" id="link43note-81">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
81 (<SPAN href="#link43noteref-81">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Paradise Lost was
published in the year 1667; and the famous lines (l. ii. 708, &c.)
which startled the licenser, may allude to the recent comet of 1664,
observed by Cassini at Rome in the presence of Queen Christina,
(Fontenelle, in his Eloge, tom. v. p. 338.) Had Charles II. betrayed any
symptoms of curiosity or fear?]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link43note-8111" id="link43note-8111">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
8111 (<SPAN href="#link43noteref-8111">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Compare Pingre,
Histoire des Cometes.—M.]</p>
<p>II. The near approach of a comet may injure or destroy the globe which we
inhabit; but the changes on its surface have been hitherto produced by the
action of volcanoes and earthquakes. <SPAN href="#link43note-82"
name="link43noteref-82" id="link43noteref-82">82</SPAN> The nature of the
soil may indicate the countries most exposed to these formidable
concussions, since they are caused by subterraneous fires, and such fires
are kindled by the union and fermentation of iron and sulphur. But their
times and effects appear to lie beyond the reach of human curiosity; and
the philosopher will discreetly abstain from the prediction of
earthquakes, till he has counted the drops of water that silently filtrate
on the inflammable mineral, and measured the caverns which increase by
resistance the explosion of the imprisoned air. Without assigning the
cause, history will distinguish the periods in which these calamitous
events have been rare or frequent, and will observe, that this fever of
the earth raged with uncommon violence during the reign of Justinian. <SPAN href="#link43note-83" name="link43noteref-83" id="link43noteref-83">83</SPAN>
Each year is marked by the repetition of earthquakes, of such duration,
that Constantinople has been shaken above forty days; of such extent, that
the shock has been communicated to the whole surface of the globe, or at
least of the Roman empire. An impulsive or vibratory motion was felt:
enormous chasms were opened, huge and heavy bodies were discharged into
the air, the sea alternately advanced and retreated beyond its ordinary
bounds, and a mountain was torn from Libanus, <SPAN href="#link43note-84"
name="link43noteref-84" id="link43noteref-84">84</SPAN> and cast into the
waves, where it protected, as a mole, the new harbor of Botrys <SPAN href="#link43note-85" name="link43noteref-85" id="link43noteref-85">85</SPAN>
in Phoenicia. The stroke that agitates an ant-hill may crush the
insect-myriads in the dust; yet truth must extort confession that man has
industriously labored for his own destruction. The institution of great
cities, which include a nation within the limits of a wall, almost
realizes the wish of Caligula, that the Roman people had but one neck. Two
hundred and fifty thousand persons are said to have perished in the
earthquake of Antioch, whose domestic multitudes were swelled by the
conflux of strangers to the festival of the Ascension. The loss of Berytus
<SPAN href="#link43note-86" name="link43noteref-86" id="link43noteref-86">86</SPAN>
was of smaller account, but of much greater value. That city, on the coast
of Phoenicia, was illustrated by the study of the civil law, which opened
the surest road to wealth and dignity: the schools of Berytus were filled
with the rising spirits of the age, and many a youth was lost in the
earthquake, who might have lived to be the scourge or the guardian of his
country. In these disasters, the architect becomes the enemy of mankind.
The hut of a savage, or the tent of an Arab, may be thrown down without
injury to the inhabitant; and the Peruvians had reason to deride the folly
of their Spanish conquerors, who with so much cost and labor erected their
own sepulchres. The rich marbles of a patrician are dashed on his own
head: a whole people is buried under the ruins of public and private
edifices, and the conflagration is kindled and propagated by the
innumerable fires which are necessary for the subsistence and manufactures
of a great city. Instead of the mutual sympathy which might comfort and
assist the distressed, they dreadfully experience the vices and passions
which are released from the fear of punishment: the tottering houses are
pillaged by intrepid avarice; revenge embraces the moment, and selects the
victim; and the earth often swallows the assassin, or the ravisher, in the
consummation of their crimes. Superstition involves the present danger
with invisible terrors; and if the image of death may sometimes be
subservient to the virtue or repentance of individuals, an affrighted
people is more forcibly moved to expect the end of the world, or to
deprecate with servile homage the wrath of an avenging Deity.</p>
<p><SPAN name="link43note-82" id="link43note-82">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
82 (<SPAN href="#link43noteref-82">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ For the cause of
earthquakes, see Buffon, (tom. i. p. 502—536 Supplement a l'Hist.
Naturelle, tom. v. p. 382-390, edition in 4to., Valmont de Bomare,
Dictionnaire d'Histoire Naturelle, Tremblemen de Terre, Pyrites,) Watson,
(Chemical Essays, tom. i. p. 181—209.)]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link43note-83" id="link43note-83">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
83 (<SPAN href="#link43noteref-83">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ The earthquakes that
shook the Roman world in the reign of Justinian are described or mentioned
by Procopius, (Goth. l. iv. c. 25 Anecdot. c. 18,) Agathias, (l. ii. p.
52, 53, 54, l. v. p. 145-152,) John Malala, (Chron. tom. ii. p. 140-146,
176, 177, 183, 193, 220, 229, 231, 233, 234,) and Theophanes, (p. 151,
183, 189, 191-196.) * Note *: Compare Daubeny on Earthquakes, and Lyell's
Geology, vol. ii. p. 161 et seq.—M]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link43note-84" id="link43note-84">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
84 (<SPAN href="#link43noteref-84">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ An abrupt height, a
perpendicular cape, between Aradus and Botrys (Polyb. l. v. p. 411.
Pompon. Mela, l. i. c. 12, p. 87, cum Isaac. Voss. Observat. Maundrell,
Journey, p. 32, 33. Pocock's Description, vol. ii. p. 99.)]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link43note-85" id="link43note-85">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
85 (<SPAN href="#link43noteref-85">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Botrys was founded
(ann. ante Christ. 935—903) by Ithobal, king of Tyre, (Marsham,
Canon. Chron. p. 387, 388.) Its poor representative, the village of
Patrone, is now destitute of a harbor.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link43note-86" id="link43note-86">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
86 (<SPAN href="#link43noteref-86">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ The university,
splendor, and ruin of Berytus are celebrated by Heineccius (p. 351—356)
as an essential part of the history of the Roman law. It was overthrown in
the xxvth year of Justinian, A. D 551, July 9, (Theophanes, p. 192;) but
Agathias (l. ii. p. 51, 52) suspends the earthquake till he has achieved
the Italian war.]</p>
<p>III. Aethiopia and Egypt have been stigmatized, in every age, as the
original source and seminary of the plague. <SPAN href="#link43note-87"
name="link43noteref-87" id="link43noteref-87">87</SPAN> In a damp, hot,
stagnating air, this African fever is generated from the putrefaction of
animal substances, and especially from the swarms of locusts, not less
destructive to mankind in their death than in their lives. The fatal
disease which depopulated the earth in the time of Justinian and his
successors, <SPAN href="#link43note-88" name="link43noteref-88" id="link43noteref-88">88</SPAN> first appeared in the neighborhood of
Pelusium, between the Serbonian bog and the eastern channel of the Nile.
From thence, tracing as it were a double path, it spread to the East, over
Syria, Persia, and the Indies, and penetrated to the West, along the coast
of Africa, and over the continent of Europe. In the spring of the second
year, Constantinople, during three or four months, was visited by the
pestilence; and Procopius, who observed its progress and symptoms with the
eyes of a physician, <SPAN href="#link43note-89" name="link43noteref-89" id="link43noteref-89">89</SPAN> has emulated the skill and diligence of
Thucydides in the description of the plague of Athens. <SPAN href="#link43note-90" name="link43noteref-90" id="link43noteref-90">90</SPAN>
The infection was sometimes announced by the visions of a distempered
fancy, and the victim despaired as soon as he had heard the menace and
felt the stroke of an invisible spectre. But the greater number, in their
beds, in the streets, in their usual occupation, were surprised by a
slight fever; so slight, indeed, that neither the pulse nor the color of
the patient gave any signs of the approaching danger. The same, the next,
or the succeeding day, it was declared by the swelling of the glands,
particularly those of the groin, of the armpits, and under the ear; and
when these buboes or tumors were opened, they were found to contain a
coal, or black substance, of the size of a lentil. If they came to a just
swelling and suppuration, the patient was saved by this kind and natural
discharge of the morbid humor. But if they continued hard and dry, a
mortification quickly ensued, and the fifth day was commonly the term of
his life. The fever was often accompanied with lethargy or delirium; the
bodies of the sick were covered with black pustules or carbuncles, the
symptoms of immediate death; and in the constitutions too feeble to
produce an irruption, the vomiting of blood was followed by a
mortification of the bowels. To pregnant women the plague was generally
mortal: yet one infant was drawn alive from his dead mother, and three
mothers survived the loss of their infected foetus. Youth was the most
perilous season; and the female sex was less susceptible than the male:
but every rank and profession was attacked with indiscriminate rage, and
many of those who escaped were deprived of the use of their speech,
without being secure from a return of the disorder. <SPAN href="#link43note-91" name="link43noteref-91" id="link43noteref-91">91</SPAN>
The physicians of Constantinople were zealous and skilful; but their art
was baffled by the various symptoms and pertinacious vehemence of the
disease: the same remedies were productive of contrary effects, and the
event capriciously disappointed their prognostics of death or recovery.
The order of funerals, and the right of sepulchres, were confounded: those
who were left without friends or servants, lay unburied in the streets, or
in their desolate houses; and a magistrate was authorized to collect the
promiscuous heaps of dead bodies, to transport them by land or water, and
to inter them in deep pits beyond the precincts of the city. Their own
danger, and the prospect of public distress, awakened some remorse in the
minds of the most vicious of mankind: the confidence of health again
revived their passions and habits; but philosophy must disdain the
observation of Procopius, that the lives of such men were guarded by the
peculiar favor of fortune or Providence. He forgot, or perhaps he secretly
recollected, that the plague had touched the person of Justinian himself;
but the abstemious diet of the emperor may suggest, as in the case of
Socrates, a more rational and honorable cause for his recovery. <SPAN href="#link43note-92" name="link43noteref-92" id="link43noteref-92">92</SPAN>
During his sickness, the public consternation was expressed in the habits
of the citizens; and their idleness and despondence occasioned a general
scarcity in the capital of the East.</p>
<p><SPAN name="link43note-87" id="link43note-87">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
87 (<SPAN href="#link43noteref-87">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ I have read with
pleasure Mead's short, but elegant, treatise concerning Pestilential
Disorders, the viiith edition, London, 1722.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link43note-88" id="link43note-88">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
88 (<SPAN href="#link43noteref-88">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ The great plague which
raged in 542 and the following years (Pagi, Critica, tom. ii. p. 518) must
be traced in Procopius, (Persic. l. ii. c. 22, 23,) Agathias, (l. v. p.
153, 154,) Evagrius, (l. iv. c. 29,) Paul Diaconus, (l. ii. c. iv. p. 776,
777,) Gregory of Tours, (tom. ii. l. iv. c. 5, p 205,) who styles it Lues
Inguinaria, and the Chronicles of Victor Tunnunensis, (p. 9, in Thesaur.
Temporum,) of Marcellinus, (p. 54,) and of Theophanes, (p. 153.)]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link43note-89" id="link43note-89">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
89 (<SPAN href="#link43noteref-89">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Dr. Friend (Hist.
Medicin. in Opp. p. 416—420, Lond. 1733) is satisfied that Procopius
must have studied physic, from his knowledge and use of the technical
words. Yet many words that are now scientific were common and popular in
the Greek idiom.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link43note-90" id="link43note-90">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
90 (<SPAN href="#link43noteref-90">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ See Thucydides, l. ii.
c. 47—54, p. 127—133, edit. Duker, and the poetical
description of the same plague by Lucretius. (l. vi. 1136—1284.) I
was indebted to Dr. Hunter for an elaborate commentary on this part of
Thucydides, a quarto of 600 pages, (Venet. 1603, apud Juntas,) which was
pronounced in St. Mark's Library by Fabius Paullinus Utinensis, a
physician and philosopher.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link43note-91" id="link43note-91">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
91 (<SPAN href="#link43noteref-91">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Thucydides (c. 51)
affirms, that the infection could only be once taken; but Evagrius, who
had family experience of the plague, observes, that some persons, who had
escaped the first, sunk under the second attack; and this repetition is
confirmed by Fabius Paullinus, (p. 588.) I observe, that on this head
physicians are divided; and the nature and operation of the disease may
not always be similar.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link43note-92" id="link43note-92">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
92 (<SPAN href="#link43noteref-92">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ It was thus that
Socrates had been saved by his temperance, in the plague of Athens, (Aul.
Gellius, Noct. Attic. ii. l.) Dr. Mead accounts for the peculiar salubrity
of religious houses, by the two advantages of seclusion and abstinence,
(p. 18, 19.)]</p>
<p>Contagion is the inseparable symptom of the plague; which, by mutual
respiration, is transfused from the infected persons to the lungs and
stomach of those who approach them. While philosophers believe and
tremble, it is singular, that the existence of a real danger should have
been denied by a people most prone to vain and imaginary terrors. <SPAN href="#link43note-93" name="link43noteref-93" id="link43noteref-93">93</SPAN>
Yet the fellow-citizens of Procopius were satisfied, by some short and
partial experience, that the infection could not be gained by the closest
conversation: <SPAN href="#link43note-94" name="link43noteref-94" id="link43noteref-94">94</SPAN> and this persuasion might support the
assiduity of friends or physicians in the care of the sick, whom inhuman
prudence would have condemned to solitude and despair. But the fatal
security, like the predestination of the Turks, must have aided the
progress of the contagion; and those salutary precautions to which Europe
is indebted for her safety, were unknown to the government of Justinian.
No restraints were imposed on the free and frequent intercourse of the
Roman provinces: from Persia to France, the nations were mingled and
infected by wars and emigrations; and the pestilential odor which lurks
for years in a bale of cotton was imported, by the abuse of trade, into
the most distant regions. The mode of its propagation is explained by the
remark of Procopius himself, that it always spread from the sea-coast to
the inland country: the most sequestered islands and mountains were
successively visited; the places which had escaped the fury of its first
passage were alone exposed to the contagion of the ensuing year. The winds
might diffuse that subtile venom; but unless the atmosphere be previously
disposed for its reception, the plague would soon expire in the cold or
temperate climates of the earth. Such was the universal corruption of the
air, that the pestilence which burst forth in the fifteenth year of
Justinian was not checked or alleviated by any difference of the seasons.
In time, its first malignity was abated and dispersed; the disease
alternately languished and revived; but it was not till the end of a
calamitous period of fifty-two years, that mankind recovered their health,
or the air resumed its pure and salubrious quality.</p>
<p>No facts have been preserved to sustain an account, or even a conjecture,
of the numbers that perished in this extraordinary mortality. I only find,
that during three months, five, and at length ten, thousand persons died
each day at Constantinople; that many cities of the East were left vacant,
and that in several districts of Italy the harvest and the vintage
withered on the ground. The triple scourge of war, pestilence, and famine,
afflicted the subjects of Justinian; and his reign is disgraced by the
visible decrease of the human species, which has never been repaired in
some of the fairest countries of the globe. <SPAN href="#link43note-95"
name="link43noteref-95" id="link43noteref-95">95</SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN name="link43note-93" id="link43note-93">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
93 (<SPAN href="#link43noteref-93">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Mead proves that the
plague is contagious from Thucydides, Lacretius, Aristotle, Galen, and
common experience, (p. 10—20;) and he refutes (Preface, p. 2—13)
the contrary opinion of the French physicians who visited Marseilles in
the year 1720. Yet these were the recent and enlightened spectators of a
plague which, in a few months, swept away 50,000 inhabitants (sur le Peste
de Marseille, Paris, 1786) of a city that, in the present hour of
prosperity and trade contains no more then 90,000 souls, (Necker, sur les
Finances, tom. i. p. 231.)]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link43note-94" id="link43note-94">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
94 (<SPAN href="#link43noteref-94">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ The strong assertions
of Procopius are overthrown by the subsequent experience of Evagrius.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link43note-95" id="link43note-95">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
95 (<SPAN href="#link43noteref-95">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ After some figures of
rhetoric, the sands of the sea, &c., Procopius (Anecdot. c. 18)
attempts a more definite account; that it had been exterminated under the
reign of the Imperial demon. The expression is obscure in grammar and
arithmetic and a literal interpretation would produce several millions of
millions Alemannus (p. 80) and Cousin (tom. iii. p. 178) translate this
passage, "two hundred millions:" but I am ignorant of their motives. The
remaining myriad of myriads, would furnish one hundred millions, a number
not wholly inadmissible.]</p>
<p><br/></p>
<hr />
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />