<p><SPAN name="link402HCH0004" id="link402HCH0004"></SPAN></p>
<h2> Chapter XL: Reign Of Justinian.—Part IV. </h2>
<p>Dishonor might be ultimately reflected on the character of Justinian; but
much of the guilt, and still more of the profit, was intercepted by the
ministers, who were seldom promoted for their virtues, and not always
selected for their talents. <SPAN href="#link40note-91"
name="link40noteref-91" id="link40noteref-91">91</SPAN> The merits of
Tribonian the quaestor will hereafter be weighed in the reformation of the
Roman law; but the economy of the East was subordinate to the Praetorian
praefect, and Procopius has justified his anecdotes by the portrait which
he exposes in his public history, of the notorious vices of John of
Cappadocia. <SPAN href="#link40note-92" name="link40noteref-92" id="link40noteref-92">92</SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN href="#link40note-921" name="link40noteref-921" id="link40noteref-921">921</SPAN>
His knowledge was not borrowed from the schools, <SPAN href="#link40note-93"
name="link40noteref-93" id="link40noteref-93">93</SPAN> and his style was
scarcely legible; but he excelled in the powers of native genius, to
suggest the wisest counsels, and to find expedients in the most desperate
situations. The corruption of his heart was equal to the vigor of his
understanding. Although he was suspected of magic and Pagan superstition,
he appeared insensible to the fear of God or the reproaches of man; and
his aspiring fortune was raised on the death of thousands, the poverty of
millions, the ruins of cities, and the desolation of provinces. From the
dawn of light to the moment of dinner, he assiduously labored to enrich
his master and himself at the expense of the Roman world; the remainder of
the day was spent in sensual and obscene pleasures, <SPAN href="#link40note-931" name="link40noteref-931" id="link40noteref-931">931</SPAN>
and the silent hours of the night were interrupted by the perpetual dread
of the justice of an assassin. His abilities, perhaps his vices,
recommended him to the lasting friendship of Justinian: the emperor
yielded with reluctance to the fury of the people; his victory was
displayed by the immediate restoration of their enemy; and they felt above
ten years, under his oppressive administration, that he was stimulated by
revenge, rather than instructed by misfortune. Their murmurs served only
to fortify the resolution of Justinian; but the resentment of Theodora,
disdained a power before which every knee was bent, and attempted to sow
the seeds of discord between the emperor and his beloved consort. Even
Theodora herself was constrained to dissemble, to wait a favorable moment,
and, by an artful conspiracy, to render John of Coppadocia the accomplice
of his own destruction. <SPAN href="#link40note-932" name="link40noteref-932" id="link40noteref-932">932</SPAN> At a time when Belisarius, unless he had
been a hero, must have shown himself a rebel, his wife Antonina, who
enjoyed the secret confidence of the empress, communicated his feigned
discontent to Euphemia, the daughter of the praefect; the credulous virgin
imparted to her father the dangerous project, and John, who might have
known the value of oaths and promises, was tempted to accept a nocturnal,
and almost treasonable, interview with the wife of Belisarius. An
ambuscade of guards and eunuchs had been posted by the command of
Theodora; they rushed with drawn swords to seize or to punish the guilty
minister: he was saved by the fidelity of his attendants; but instead of
appealing to a gracious sovereign, who had privately warned him of his
danger, he pusillanimously fled to the sanctuary of the church. The
favorite of Justinian was sacrificed to conjugal tenderness or domestic
tranquility; the conversion of a praefect into a priest extinguished his
ambitious hopes: but the friendship of the emperor alleviated his
disgrace, and he retained in the mild exile of Cyzicus an ample portion of
his riches. Such imperfect revenge could not satisfy the unrelenting
hatred of Theodora; the murder of his old enemy, the bishop of Cyzicus,
afforded a decent pretence; and John of Cappadocia, whose actions had
deserved a thousand deaths, was at last condemned for a crime of which he
was innocent. A great minister, who had been invested with the honors of
consul and patrician, was ignominiously scourged like the vilest of
malefactors; a tattered cloak was the sole remnant of his fortunes; he was
transported in a bark to the place of his banishment at Antinopolis in
Upper Egypt, and the praefect of the East begged his bread through the
cities which had trembled at his name. During an exile of seven years, his
life was protracted and threatened by the ingenious cruelty of Theodora;
and when her death permitted the emperor to recall a servant whom he had
abandoned with regret, the ambition of John of Cappadocia was reduced to
the humble duties of the sacerdotal profession. His successors convinced
the subjects of Justinian, that the arts of oppression might still be
improved by experience and industry; the frauds of a Syrian banker were
introduced into the administration of the finances; and the example of the
praefect was diligently copied by the quaestor, the public and private
treasurer, the governors of provinces, and the principal magistrates of
the Eastern empire. <SPAN href="#link40note-94" name="link40noteref-94" id="link40noteref-94">94</SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN name="link40note-91" id="link40note-91">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
91 (<SPAN href="#link40noteref-91">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ One of these,
Anatolius, perished in an earthquake—doubtless a judgment! The
complaints and clamors of the people in Agathias (l. v. p. 146, 147) are
almost an echo of the anecdote. The aliena pecunia reddenda of Corippus
(l. ii. 381, &c.,) is not very honorable to Justinian's memory.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link40note-92" id="link40note-92">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
92 (<SPAN href="#link40noteref-92">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ See the history and
character of John of Cappadocia in Procopius. (Persic, l. i. c. 35, 25, l.
ii. c. 30. Vandal. l. i. c. 13. Anecdot. c. 2, 17, 22.) The agreement of
the history and anecdotes is a mortal wound to the reputation of the
praefct.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link40note-921" id="link40note-921">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
921 (<SPAN href="#link40noteref-921">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ This view,
particularly of the cruelty of John of Cappadocia, is confirmed by the
testimony of Joannes Lydus, who was in the office of the praefect, and
eye-witness of the tortures inflicted by his command on the miserable
debtors, or supposed debtors, of the state. He mentions one horrible
instance of a respectable old man, with whom he was personally acquainted,
who, being suspected of possessing money, was hung up by the hands till he
was dead. Lydus de Magist. lib. iii. c. 57, p. 254.—M.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link40note-93" id="link40note-93">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
93 (<SPAN href="#link40noteref-93">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ A forcible expression.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link40note-931" id="link40note-931">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
931 (<SPAN href="#link40noteref-931">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Joannes Lydus is
diffuse on this subject, lib. iii. c. 65, p. 268. But the indignant virtue
of Lydus seems greatly stimulated by the loss of his official fees, which
he ascribes to the innovations of the minister.—M.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link40note-932" id="link40note-932">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
932 (<SPAN href="#link40noteref-932">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ According to Lydus,
Theodora disclosed the crimes and unpopularity of the minister to
Justinian, but the emperor had not the courage to remove, and was unable
to replace, a servant, under whom his finances seemed to prosper. He
attributes the sedition and conflagration to the popular resentment
against the tyranny of John, lib. iii. c 70, p. 278. Unfortunately there
is a large gap in his work just at this period.—M.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link40note-94" id="link40note-94">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
94 (<SPAN href="#link40noteref-94">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ The chronology of
Procopius is loose and obscure; but with the aid of Pagi I can discern
that John was appointed Praetorian praefect of the East in the year 530—that
he was removed in January, 532—restored before June, 533—banished
in 541—and recalled between June, 548, and April 1, 549. Aleman. (p.
96, 97) gives the list of his ten successors—a rapid series in a
part of a single reign. * Note: Lydus gives a high character of Phocas,
his successor tom. iii. c. 78 p. 288.—M.]</p>
<p>V. The edifices of Justinian were cemented with the blood and treasure of
his people; but those stately structures appeared to announce the
prosperity of the empire, and actually displayed the skill of their
architects. Both the theory and practice of the arts which depend on
mathematical science and mechanical power, were cultivated under the
patronage of the emperors; the fame of Archimedes was rivalled by Proclus
and Anthemius; and if their miracles had been related by intelligent
spectators, they might now enlarge the speculations, instead of exciting
the distrust, of philosophers. A tradition has prevailed, that the Roman
fleet was reduced to ashes in the port of Syracuse, by the burning-glasses
of Archimedes; <SPAN href="#link40note-95" name="link40noteref-95" id="link40noteref-95">95</SPAN> and it is asserted, that a similar expedient
was employed by Proclus to destroy the Gothic vessels in the harbor of
Constantinople, and to protect his benefactor Anastasius against the bold
enterprise of Vitalian. <SPAN href="#link40note-96" name="link40noteref-96" id="link40noteref-96">96</SPAN> A machine was fixed on the walls of the city,
consisting of a hexagon mirror of polished brass, with many smaller and
movable polygons to receive and reflect the rays of the meridian sun; and
a consuming flame was darted, to the distance, perhaps of two hundred
feet. <SPAN href="#link40note-97" name="link40noteref-97" id="link40noteref-97">97</SPAN> The truth of these two extraordinary facts is
invalidated by the silence of the most authentic historians; and the use
of burning-glasses was never adopted in the attack or defence of places.
<SPAN href="#link40note-98" name="link40noteref-98" id="link40noteref-98">98</SPAN>
Yet the admirable experiments of a French philosopher <SPAN href="#link40note-99" name="link40noteref-99" id="link40noteref-99">99</SPAN>
have demonstrated the possibility of such a mirror; and, since it is
possible, I am more disposed to attribute the art to the greatest
mathematicians of antiquity, than to give the merit of the fiction to the
idle fancy of a monk or a sophist. According to another story, Proclus
applied sulphur to the destruction of the Gothic fleet; <SPAN href="#link40note-100" name="link40noteref-100" id="link40noteref-100">100</SPAN>
in a modern imagination, the name of sulphur is instantly connected with
the suspicion of gunpowder, and that suspicion is propagated by the secret
arts of his disciple Anthemius. <SPAN href="#link40note-101"
name="link40noteref-101" id="link40noteref-101">101</SPAN> A citizen of
Tralles in Asia had five sons, who were all distinguished in their
respective professions by merit and success. Olympius excelled in the
knowledge and practice of the Roman jurisprudence. Dioscorus and Alexander
became learned physicians; but the skill of the former was exercised for
the benefit of his fellow-citizens, while his more ambitious brother
acquired wealth and reputation at Rome. The fame of Metrodorus the
grammarian, and of Anthemius the mathematician and architect, reached the
ears of the emperor Justinian, who invited them to Constantinople; and
while the one instructed the rising generation in the schools of
eloquence, the other filled the capital and provinces with more lasting
monuments of his art. In a trifling dispute relative to the walls or
windows of their contiguous houses, he had been vanquished by the
eloquence of his neighbor Zeno; but the orator was defeated in his turn by
the master of mechanics, whose malicious, though harmless, stratagems are
darkly represented by the ignorance of Agathias. In a lower room,
Anthemius arranged several vessels or caldrons of water, each of them
covered by the wide bottom of a leathern tube, which rose to a narrow top,
and was artificially conveyed among the joists and rafters of the adjacent
building. A fire was kindled beneath the caldron; the steam of the boiling
water ascended through the tubes; the house was shaken by the efforts of
imprisoned air, and its trembling inhabitants might wonder that the city
was unconscious of the earthquake which they had felt. At another time,
the friends of Zeno, as they sat at table, were dazzled by the intolerable
light which flashed in their eyes from the reflecting mirrors of
Anthemius; they were astonished by the noise which he produced from the
collision of certain minute and sonorous particles; and the orator
declared in tragic style to the senate, that a mere mortal must yield to
the power of an antagonist, who shook the earth with the trident of
Neptune, and imitated the thunder and lightning of Jove himself. The
genius of Anthemius, and his colleague Isidore the Milesian, was excited
and employed by a prince, whose taste for architecture had degenerated
into a mischievous and costly passion. His favorite architects submitted
their designs and difficulties to Justinian, and discreetly confessed how
much their laborious meditations were surpassed by the intuitive knowledge
of celestial inspiration of an emperor, whose views were always directed
to the benefit of his people, the glory of his reign, and the salvation of
his soul. <SPAN href="#link40note-102" name="link40noteref-102" id="link40noteref-102">102</SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN name="link40note-95" id="link40note-95">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
95 (<SPAN href="#link40noteref-95">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ This conflagration is
hinted by Lucian (in Hippia, c. 2) and Galen, (l. iii. de Temperamentis,
tom. i. p. 81, edit. Basil.) in the second century. A thousand years
afterwards, it is positively affirmed by Zonaras, (l. ix. p. 424,) on the
faith of Dion Cassius, Tzetzes, (Chiliad ii. 119, &c.,) Eustathius,
(ad Iliad. E. p. 338,) and the scholiast of Lucian. See Fabricius,
(Bibliot. Graec. l. iii. c. 22, tom. ii. p. 551, 552,) to whom I am more
or less indebted for several of these quotations.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link40note-96" id="link40note-96">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
96 (<SPAN href="#link40noteref-96">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Zonaras (l. xi. c. p.
55) affirms the fact, without quoting any evidence.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link40note-97" id="link40note-97">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
97 (<SPAN href="#link40noteref-97">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Tzetzes describes the
artifice of these burning-glasses, which he had read, perhaps, with no
learned eyes, in a mathematical treatise of Anthemius. That treatise has
been lately published, translated, and illustrated, by M. Dupuys, a
scholar and a mathematician, (Memoires de l'Academie des Inscriptions, tom
xlii p. 392—451.)]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link40note-98" id="link40note-98">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
98 (<SPAN href="#link40noteref-98">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ In the siege of
Syracuse, by the silence of Polybius, Plutarch, Livy; in the siege of
Constantinople, by that of Marcellinus and all the contemporaries of the
vith century.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link40note-99" id="link40note-99">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
99 (<SPAN href="#link40noteref-99">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Without any previous
knowledge of Tzetzes or Anthemius, the immortal Buffon imagined and
executed a set of burning-glasses, with which he could inflame planks at
the distance of 200 feet, (Supplement a l'Hist. Naturelle, tom. i. 399—483,
quarto edition.) What miracles would not his genius have performed for the
public service, with royal expense, and in the strong sun of
Constantinople or Syracuse?]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link40note-100" id="link40note-100">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
100 (<SPAN href="#link40noteref-100">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ John Malala (tom. ii.
p. 120—124) relates the fact; but he seems to confound the names or
persons of Proclus and Marinus.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link40note-101" id="link40note-101">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
101 (<SPAN href="#link40noteref-101">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Agathias, l. v. p.
149—152. The merit of Anthemius as an architect is loudly praised by
Procopius (de Edif. l. i. c. 1) and Paulus Silentiarius, (part i. 134,
&c.)]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link40note-102" id="link40note-102">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
102 (<SPAN href="#link40noteref-102">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ See Procopius, (de
Edificiis, l. i. c. 1, 2, l. ii. c. 3.) He relates a coincidence of
dreams, which supposes some fraud in Justinian or his architect. They both
saw, in a vision, the same plan for stopping an inundation at Dara. A
stone quarry near Jerusalem was revealed to the emperor, (l. v. c. 6:) an
angel was tricked into the perpetual custody of St. Sophia, (Anonym. de
Antiq. C. P. l. iv. p. 70.)]</p>
<p>The principal church, which was dedicated by the founder of Constantinople
to St. Sophia, or the eternal wisdom, had been twice destroyed by fire;
after the exile of John Chrysostom, and during the Nika of the blue and
green factions. No sooner did the tumult subside, than the Christian
populace deplored their sacrilegious rashness; but they might have
rejoiced in the calamity, had they foreseen the glory of the new temple,
which at the end of forty days was strenuously undertaken by the piety of
Justinian. <SPAN href="#link40note-103" name="link40noteref-103" id="link40noteref-103">103</SPAN> The ruins were cleared away, a more
spacious plan was described, and as it required the consent of some
proprietors of ground, they obtained the most exorbitant terms from the
eager desires and timorous conscience of the monarch. Anthemius formed the
design, and his genius directed the hands of ten thousand workmen, whose
payment in pieces of fine silver was never delayed beyond the evening. The
emperor himself, clad in a linen tunic, surveyed each day their rapid
progress, and encouraged their diligence by his familiarity, his zeal, and
his rewards. The new Cathedral of St. Sophia was consecrated by the
patriarch, five years, eleven months, and ten days from the first
foundation; and in the midst of the solemn festival Justinian exclaimed
with devout vanity, "Glory be to God, who hath thought me worthy to
accomplish so great a work; I have vanquished thee, O Solomon!" <SPAN href="#link40note-104" name="link40noteref-104" id="link40noteref-104">104</SPAN>
But the pride of the Roman Solomon, before twenty years had elapsed, was
humbled by an earthquake, which overthrew the eastern part of the dome.
Its splendor was again restored by the perseverance of the same prince;
and in the thirty-sixth year of his reign, Justinian celebrated the second
dedication of a temple which remains, after twelve centuries, a stately
monument of his fame. The architecture of St. Sophia, which is now
converted into the principal mosch, has been imitated by the Turkish
sultans, and that venerable pile continues to excite the fond admiration
of the Greeks, and the more rational curiosity of European travellers. The
eye of the spectator is disappointed by an irregular prospect of
half-domes and shelving roofs: the western front, the principal approach,
is destitute of simplicity and magnificence; and the scale of dimensions
has been much surpassed by several of the Latin cathedrals. But the
architect who first erected and aerial cupola, is entitled to the praise
of bold design and skilful execution. The dome of St. Sophia, illuminated
by four-and-twenty windows, is formed with so small a curve, that the
depth is equal only to one sixth of its diameter; the measure of that
diameter is one hundred and fifteen feet, and the lofty centre, where a
crescent has supplanted the cross, rises to the perpendicular height of
one hundred and eighty feet above the pavement. The circle which
encompasses the dome, lightly reposes on four strong arches, and their
weight is firmly supported by four massy piles, whose strength is
assisted, on the northern and southern sides, by four columns of Egyptian
granite.</p>
<p>A Greek cross, inscribed in a quadrangle, represents the form of the
edifice; the exact breadth is two hundred and forty-three feet, and two
hundred and sixty-nine may be assigned for the extreme length from the
sanctuary in the east, to the nine western doors, which open into the
vestibule, and from thence into the narthex or exterior portico. That
portico was the humble station of the penitents. The nave or body of the
church was filled by the congregation of the faithful; but the two sexes
were prudently distinguished, and the upper and lower galleries were
allotted for the more private devotion of the women. Beyond the northern
and southern piles, a balustrade, terminated on either side by the thrones
of the emperor and the patriarch, divided the nave from the choir; and the
space, as far as the steps of the altar, was occupied by the clergy and
singers. The altar itself, a name which insensibly became familiar to
Christian ears, was placed in the eastern recess, artificially built in
the form of a demi-cylinder; and this sanctuary communicated by several
doors with the sacristy, the vestry, the baptistery, and the contiguous
buildings, subservient either to the pomp of worship, or the private use
of the ecclesiastical ministers. The memory of past calamities inspired
Justinian with a wise resolution, that no wood, except for the doors,
should be admitted into the new edifice; and the choice of the materials
was applied to the strength, the lightness, or the splendor of the
respective parts. The solid piles which contained the cupola were composed
of huge blocks of freestone, hewn into squares and triangles, fortified by
circles of iron, and firmly cemented by the infusion of lead and
quicklime: but the weight of the cupola was diminished by the levity of
its substance, which consists either of pumice-stone that floats in the
water, or of bricks from the Isle of Rhodes, five times less ponderous
than the ordinary sort. The whole frame of the edifice was constructed of
brick; but those base materials were concealed by a crust of marble; and
the inside of St. Sophia, the cupola, the two larger, and the six smaller,
semi-domes, the walls, the hundred columns, and the pavement, delight even
the eyes of Barbarians, with a rich and variegated picture. A poet, <SPAN href="#link40note-105" name="link40noteref-105" id="link40noteref-105">105</SPAN>
who beheld the primitive lustre of St. Sophia, enumerates the colors, the
shades, and the spots of ten or twelve marbles, jaspers, and porphyries,
which nature had profusely diversified, and which were blended and
contrasted as it were by a skilful painter. The triumph of Christ was
adorned with the last spoils of Paganism, but the greater part of these
costly stones was extracted from the quarries of Asia Minor, the isles and
continent of Greece, Egypt, Africa, and Gaul. Eight columns of porphyry,
which Aurelian had placed in the temple of the sun, were offered by the
piety of a Roman matron; eight others of green marble were presented by
the ambitious zeal of the magistrates of Ephesus: both are admirable by
their size and beauty, but every order of architecture disclaims their
fantastic capital. A variety of ornaments and figures was curiously
expressed in mosaic; and the images of Christ, of the Virgin, of saints,
and of angels, which have been defaced by Turkish fanaticism, were
dangerously exposed to the superstition of the Greeks. According to the
sanctity of each object, the precious metals were distributed in thin
leaves or in solid masses. The balustrade of the choir, the capitals of
the pillars, the ornaments of the doors and galleries, were of gilt
bronze; the spectator was dazzled by the glittering aspect of the cupola;
the sanctuary contained forty thousand pounds weight of silver; and the
holy vases and vestments of the altar were of the purest gold, enriched
with inestimable gems. Before the structure of the church had arisen two
cubits above the ground, forty-five thousand two hundred pounds were
already consumed; and the whole expense amounted to three hundred and
twenty thousand: each reader, according to the measure of his belief, may
estimate their value either in gold or silver; but the sum of one million
sterling is the result of the lowest computation. A magnificent temple is
a laudable monument of national taste and religion; and the enthusiast who
entered the dome of St. Sophia might be tempted to suppose that it was the
residence, or even the workmanship, of the Deity. Yet how dull is the
artifice, how insignificant is the labor, if it be compared with the
formation of the vilest insect that crawls upon the surface of the temple!
<SPAN name="link40note-103" id="link40note-103">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
103 (<SPAN href="#link40noteref-103">return</SPAN>)<br/> [Among the crowd of
ancients and moderns who have celebrated the edifice of St. Sophia, I
shall distinguish and follow, 1. Four original spectators and historians:
Procopius, (de Edific. l. i. c. 1,) Agathias, (l. v. p. 152, 153,) Paul
Silentiarius, (in a poem of 1026 hexameters, and calcem Annae Commen.
Alexiad.,) and Evagrius, (l. iv. c. 31.) 2. Two legendary Greeks of a
later period: George Codinus, (de Origin. C. P. p. 64-74,) and the
anonymous writer of Banduri, (Imp. Orient. tom. i. l. iv. p. 65—80.)3.
The great Byzantine antiquarian. Ducange, (Comment. ad Paul Silentiar. p.
525—598, and C. P. Christ. l. iii. p. 5—78.) 4. Two French
travellers—the one, Peter Gyllius, (de Topograph. C. P. l. ii. c. 3,
4,) in the xvith; the other, Grelot, (Voyage de C. P. p. 95—164,
Paris, 1680, in 4to:) he has given plans, prospects, and inside views of
St. Sophia; and his plans, though on a smaller scale, appear more correct
than those of Ducange. I have adopted and reduced the measures of Grelot:
but as no Christian can now ascend the dome, the height is borrowed from
Evagrius, compared with Gyllius, Greaves, and the Oriental Geographer.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link40note-104" id="link40note-104">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
104 (<SPAN href="#link40noteref-104">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Solomon's temple was
surrounded with courts, porticos, &c.; but the proper structure of the
house of God was no more (if we take the Egyptian or Hebrew cubic at 22
inches) than 55 feet in height, 36 2/3 in breadth, and 110 in length—a
small parish church, says Prideaux, (Connection, vol. i. p. 144, folio;)
but few sanctuaries could be valued at four or five millions sterling! *
Note *: Hist of Jews, vol i p 257.—M]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link40note-105" id="link40note-105">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
105 (<SPAN href="#link40noteref-105">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Paul Silentiarius, in
dark and poetic language, describes the various stones and marbles that
were employed in the edifice of St. Sophia, (P. ii. p. 129, 133, &c.,
&c.:)</p>
<p class="foot">
1. The Carystian—pale, with iron veins.</p>
<p class="foot">
2. The Phrygian—of two sorts, both of a rosy hue; the one with a
white shade, the other purple, with silver flowers.</p>
<p class="foot">
3. The Porphyry of Egypt—with small stars.</p>
<p class="foot">
4. The green marble of Laconia.</p>
<p class="foot">
5. The Carian—from Mount Iassis, with oblique veins, white and red.
6. The Lydian—pale, with a red flower.</p>
<p class="foot">
7. The African, or Mauritanian—of a gold or saffron hue. 8. The
Celtic—black, with white veins.</p>
<p class="foot">
9. The Bosphoric—white, with black edges. Besides the Proconnesian
which formed the pavement; the Thessalian, Molossian, &c., which are
less distinctly painted.]</p>
<p>So minute a description of an edifice which time has respected, may attest
the truth, and excuse the relation, of the innumerable works, both in the
capital and provinces, which Justinian constructed on a smaller scale and
less durable foundations. <SPAN href="#link40note-106"
name="link40noteref-106" id="link40noteref-106">106</SPAN> In Constantinople
alone and the adjacent suburbs, he dedicated twenty-five churches to the
honor of Christ, the Virgin, and the saints: most of these churches were
decorated with marble and gold; and their various situation was skilfully
chosen in a populous square, or a pleasant grove; on the margin of the
sea-shore, or on some lofty eminence which overlooked the continents of
Europe and Asia. The church of the Holy Apostles at Constantinople, and
that of St. John at Ephesus, appear to have been framed on the same model:
their domes aspired to imitate the cupolas of St. Sophia; but the altar
was more judiciously placed under the centre of the dome, at the junction
of four stately porticos, which more accurately expressed the figure of
the Greek cross. The Virgin of Jerusalem might exult in the temple erected
by her Imperial votary on a most ungrateful spot, which afforded neither
ground nor materials to the architect. A level was formed by raising part
of a deep valley to the height of the mountain. The stones of a
neighboring quarry were hewn into regular forms; each block was fixed on a
peculiar carriage, drawn by forty of the strongest oxen, and the roads
were widened for the passage of such enormous weights. Lebanon furnished
her loftiest cedars for the timbers of the church; and the seasonable
discovery of a vein of red marble supplied its beautiful columns, two of
which, the supporters of the exterior portico, were esteemed the largest
in the world. The pious munificence of the emperor was diffused over the
Holy Land; and if reason should condemn the monasteries of both sexes
which were built or restored by Justinian, yet charity must applaud the
wells which he sunk, and the hospitals which he founded, for the relief of
the weary pilgrims. The schismatical temper of Egypt was ill entitled to
the royal bounty; but in Syria and Africa, some remedies were applied to
the disasters of wars and earthquakes, and both Carthage and Antioch,
emerging from their ruins, might revere the name of their gracious
benefactor. <SPAN href="#link40note-107" name="link40noteref-107" id="link40noteref-107">107</SPAN> Almost every saint in the calendar acquired
the honors of a temple; almost every city of the empire obtained the solid
advantages of bridges, hospitals, and aqueducts; but the severe liberality
of the monarch disdained to indulge his subjects in the popular luxury of
baths and theatres. While Justinian labored for the public service, he was
not unmindful of his own dignity and ease. The Byzantine palace, which had
been damaged by the conflagration, was restored with new magnificence; and
some notion may be conceived of the whole edifice, by the vestibule or
hall, which, from the doors perhaps, or the roof, was surnamed chalce, or
the brazen. The dome of a spacious quadrangle was supported by massy
pillars; the pavement and walls were incrusted with many-colored marbles—the
emerald green of Laconia, the fiery red, and the white Phrygian stone,
intersected with veins of a sea-green hue: the mosaic paintings of the
dome and sides represented the glories of the African and Italian
triumphs. On the Asiatic shore of the Propontis, at a small distance to
the east of Chalcedon, the costly palace and gardens of Heraeum <SPAN href="#link40note-108" name="link40noteref-108" id="link40noteref-108">108</SPAN>
were prepared for the summer residence of Justinian, and more especially
of Theodora. The poets of the age have celebrated the rare alliance of
nature and art, the harmony of the nymphs of the groves, the fountains,
and the waves: yet the crowd of attendants who followed the court
complained of their inconvenient lodgings, <SPAN href="#link40note-109"
name="link40noteref-109" id="link40noteref-109">109</SPAN> and the nymphs
were too often alarmed by the famous Porphyrio, a whale of ten cubits in
breadth, and thirty in length, who was stranded at the mouth of the River
Sangaris, after he had infested more than half a century the seas of
Constantinople. <SPAN href="#link40note-110" name="link40noteref-110" id="link40noteref-110">110</SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN name="link40note-106" id="link40note-106">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
106 (<SPAN href="#link40noteref-106">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ The six books of the
Edifices of Procopius are thus distributed the first is confined to
Constantinople: the second includes Mesopotamia and Syria the third,
Armenia and the Euxine; the fourth, Europe; the fifth, Asia Minor and
Palestine; the sixth, Egypt and Africa. Italy is forgot by the emperor or
the historian, who published this work of adulation before the date (A.D.
555) of its final conquest.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link40note-107" id="link40note-107">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
107 (<SPAN href="#link40noteref-107">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Justinian once gave
forty-five centenaries of gold (180,000 L.) for the repairs of Antioch
after the earthquake, (John Malala, tom. ii p 146—149.)]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link40note-108" id="link40note-108">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
108 (<SPAN href="#link40noteref-108">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ For the Heraeum, the
palace of Theodora, see Gyllius, (de Bosphoro Thracio, l. iii. c. xi.,)
Aleman. (Not. ad. Anec. p. 80, 81, who quotes several epigrams of the
Anthology,) and Ducange, (C. P. Christ. l. iv. c. 13, p. 175, 176.)]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link40note-109" id="link40note-109">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
109 (<SPAN href="#link40noteref-109">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Compare, in the
Edifices, (l. i. c. 11,) and in the Anecdotes, (c. 8, 15.) the different
styles of adulation and malevolence: stripped of the paint, or cleansed
from the dirt, the object appears to be the same.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link40note-110" id="link40note-110">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
110 (<SPAN href="#link40noteref-110">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Procopius, l. viii.
29; most probably a stranger and wanderer, as the Mediterranean does not
breed whales. Balaenae quoque in nostra maria penetrant, (Plin. Hist.
Natur. ix. 2.) Between the polar circle and the tropic, the cetaceous
animals of the ocean grow to the length of 50, 80, or 100 feet, (Hist. des
Voyages, tom. xv. p. 289. Pennant's British Zoology, vol. iii. p. 35.)]</p>
<p>The fortifications of Europe and Asia were multiplied by Justinian; but
the repetition of those timid and fruitless precautions exposes, to a
philosophic eye, the debility of the empire. <SPAN href="#link40note-111"
name="link40noteref-111" id="link40noteref-111">111</SPAN> From Belgrade to
the Euxine, from the conflux of the Save to the mouth of the Danube, a
chain of above fourscore fortified places was extended along the banks of
the great river. Single watch-towers were changed into spacious citadels;
vacant walls, which the engineers contracted or enlarged according to the
nature of the ground, were filled with colonies or garrisons; a strong
fortress defended the ruins of Trajan's bridge, <SPAN href="#link40note-112"
name="link40noteref-112" id="link40noteref-112">112</SPAN> and several
military stations affected to spread beyond the Danube the pride of the
Roman name. But that name was divested of its terrors; the Barbarians, in
their annual inroads, passed, and contemptuously repassed, before these
useless bulwarks; and the inhabitants of the frontier, instead of reposing
under the shadow of the general defence, were compelled to guard, with
incessant vigilance, their separate habitations. The solitude of ancient
cities, was replenished; the new foundations of Justinian acquired,
perhaps too hastily, the epithets of impregnable and populous; and the
auspicious place of his own nativity attracted the grateful reverence of
the vainest of princes. Under the name of Justiniana prima, the obscure
village of Tauresium became the seat of an archbishop and a praefect,
whose jurisdiction extended over seven warlike provinces of Illyricum; <SPAN href="#link40note-113" name="link40noteref-113" id="link40noteref-113">113</SPAN>
and the corrupt appellation of Giustendil still indicates, about twenty
miles to the south of Sophia, the residence of a Turkish sanjak. <SPAN href="#link40note-114" name="link40noteref-114" id="link40noteref-114">114</SPAN>
For the use of the emperor's countryman, a cathedral, a place, and an
aqueduct, were speedily constructed; the public and private edifices were
adapted to the greatness of a royal city; and the strength of the walls
resisted, during the lifetime of Justinian, the unskilful assaults of the
Huns and Sclavonians. Their progress was sometimes retarded, and their
hopes of rapine were disappointed, by the innumerable castles which, in
the provinces of Dacia, Epirus, Thessaly, Macedonia, and Thrace, appeared
to cover the whole face of the country. Six hundred of these forts were
built or repaired by the emperor; but it seems reasonable to believe, that
the far greater part consisted only of a stone or brick tower, in the
midst of a square or circular area, which was surrounded by a wall and
ditch, and afforded in a moment of danger some protection to the peasants
and cattle of the neighboring villages. <SPAN href="#link40note-115"
name="link40noteref-115" id="link40noteref-115">115</SPAN> Yet these military
works, which exhausted the public treasure, could not remove the just
apprehensions of Justinian and his European subjects. The warm baths of
Anchialus in Thrace were rendered as safe as they were salutary; but the
rich pastures of Thessalonica were foraged by the Scythian cavalry; the
delicious vale of Tempe, three hundred miles from the Danube, was
continually alarmed by the sound of war; <SPAN href="#link40note-116"
name="link40noteref-116" id="link40noteref-116">116</SPAN> and no unfortified
spot, however distant or solitary, could securely enjoy the blessings of
peace. The Straits of Thermopylae, which seemed to protect, but which had
so often betrayed, the safety of Greece, were diligently strengthened by
the labors of Justinian. From the edge of the sea-shore, through the
forests and valleys, and as far as the summit of the Thessalian mountains,
a strong wall was continued, which occupied every practicable entrance.
Instead of a hasty crowd of peasants, a garrison of two thousand soldiers
was stationed along the rampart; granaries of corn and reservoirs of water
were provided for their use; and by a precaution that inspired the
cowardice which it foresaw, convenient fortresses were erected for their
retreat. The walls of Corinth, overthrown by an earthquake, and the
mouldering bulwarks of Athens and Plataea, were carefully restored; the
Barbarians were discouraged by the prospect of successive and painful
sieges: and the naked cities of Peloponnesus were covered by the
fortifications of the Isthmus of Corinth. At the extremity of Europe,
another peninsula, the Thracian Chersonesus, runs three days' journey into
the sea, to form, with the adjacent shores of Asia, the Straits of the
Hellespont. The intervals between eleven populous towns were filled by
lofty woods, fair pastures, and arable lands; and the isthmus, of thirty
seven stadia or furlongs, had been fortified by a Spartan general nine
hundred years before the reign of Justinian. <SPAN href="#link40note-117"
name="link40noteref-117" id="link40noteref-117">117</SPAN> In an age of
freedom and valor, the slightest rampart may prevent a surprise; and
Procopius appears insensible of the superiority of ancient times, while he
praises the solid construction and double parapet of a wall, whose long
arms stretched on either side into the sea; but whose strength was deemed
insufficient to guard the Chersonesus, if each city, and particularly
Gallipoli and Sestus, had not been secured by their peculiar
fortifications. The long wall, as it was emphatically styled, was a work
as disgraceful in the object, as it was respectable in the execution. The
riches of a capital diffuse themselves over the neighboring country, and
the territory of Constantinople a paradise of nature, was adorned with the
luxurious gardens and villas of the senators and opulent citizens. But
their wealth served only to attract the bold and rapacious Barbarians; the
noblest of the Romans, in the bosom of peaceful indolence, were led away
into Scythian captivity, and their sovereign might view from his palace
the hostile flames which were insolently spread to the gates of the
Imperial city. At the distance only of forty miles, Anastasius was
constrained to establish a last frontier; his long wall, of sixty miles
from the Propontis to the Euxine, proclaimed the impotence of his arms;
and as the danger became more imminent, new fortifications were added by
the indefatigable prudence of Justinian. <SPAN href="#link40note-118"
name="link40noteref-118" id="link40noteref-118">118</SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN name="link40note-111" id="link40note-111">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
111 (<SPAN href="#link40noteref-111">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Montesquieu observes,
(tom. iii. p. 503, Considerations sur la Grandeur et la Decadence des
Romains, c. xx.,) that Justinian's empire was like France in the time of
the Norman inroads—never so weak as when every village was
fortified.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link40note-112" id="link40note-112">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
112 (<SPAN href="#link40noteref-112">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Procopius affirms (l.
iv. c. 6) that the Danube was stopped by the ruins of the bridge. Had
Apollodorus, the architect, left a description of his own work, the
fabulous wonders of Dion Cassius (l lxviii. p. 1129) would have been
corrected by the genuine picture Trajan's bridge consisted of twenty or
twenty-two stone piles with wooden arches; the river is shallow, the
current gentle, and the whole interval no more than 443 (Reimer ad Dion.
from Marsigli) or 5l7 toises, (D'Anville, Geographie Ancienne, tom. i. p.
305.)]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link40note-113" id="link40note-113">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
113 (<SPAN href="#link40noteref-113">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Of the two Dacias,
Mediterranea and Ripensis, Dardania, Pravalitana, the second Maesia, and
the second Macedonia. See Justinian (Novell. xi.,) who speaks of his
castles beyond the Danube, and on omines semper bellicis sudoribus
inhaerentes.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link40note-114" id="link40note-114">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
114 (<SPAN href="#link40noteref-114">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ See D'Anville,
(Memoires de l'Academie, &c., tom. xxxi p. 280, 299,) Rycaut, (Present
State of the Turkish Empire, p. 97, 316,) Max sigli, (Stato Militare del
Imperio Ottomano, p. 130.) The sanjak of Giustendil is one of the twenty
under the beglerbeg of Rurselis, and his district maintains 48 zaims and
588 timariots.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link40note-115" id="link40note-115">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
115 (<SPAN href="#link40noteref-115">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ These fortifications
may be compared to the castles in Mingrelia (Chardin, Voyages en Perse,
tom. i. p. 60, 131)—a natural picture.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link40note-116" id="link40note-116">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
116 (<SPAN href="#link40noteref-116">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ The valley of Tempe
is situate along the River Peneus, between the hills of Ossa and Olympus:
it is only five miles long, and in some places no more than 120 feet in
breadth. Its verdant beauties are elegantly described by Pliny, (Hist.
Natur. l. iv. 15,) and more diffusely by Aelian, (Hist. Var. l. iii. c.
i.)]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link40note-117" id="link40note-117">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
117 (<SPAN href="#link40noteref-117">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Xenophon Hellenic. l.
iii. c. 2. After a long and tedious conversation with the Byzantine
declaimers, how refreshing is the truth, the simplicity, the elegance of
an Attic writer!]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link40note-118" id="link40note-118">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
118 (<SPAN href="#link40noteref-118">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ See the long wall in
Evagarius, (l. iv. c. 38.) This whole article is drawn from the fourth
book of the Edifices, except Anchialus, (l. iii. c. 7.)]</p>
<p>Asia Minor, after the submission of the Isaurians, <SPAN href="#link40note-119" name="link40noteref-119" id="link40noteref-119">119</SPAN>
remained without enemies and without fortifications. Those bold savages,
who had disdained to be the subjects of Gallienus, persisted two hundred
and thirty years in a life of independence and rapine. The most successful
princes respected the strength of the mountains and the despair of the
natives; their fierce spirit was sometimes soothed with gifts, and
sometimes restrained by terror; and a military count, with three legions,
fixed his permanent and ignominious station in the heart of the Roman
provinces. <SPAN href="#link40note-120" name="link40noteref-120" id="link40noteref-120">120</SPAN> But no sooner was the vigilance of power
relaxed or diverted, than the light-armed squadrons descended from the
hills, and invaded the peaceful plenty of Asia. Although the Isaurians
were not remarkable for stature or bravery, want rendered them bold, and
experience made them skilful in the exercise of predatory war. They
advanced with secrecy and speed to the attack of villages and defenceless
towns; their flying parties have sometimes touched the Hellespont, the
Euxine, and the gates of Tarsus, Antioch, or Damascus; <SPAN href="#link40note-121" name="link40noteref-121" id="link40noteref-121">121</SPAN>
and the spoil was lodged in their inaccessible mountains, before the Roman
troops had received their orders, or the distant province had computed its
loss. The guilt of rebellion and robbery excluded them from the rights of
national enemies; and the magistrates were instructed, by an edict, that
the trial or punishment of an Isaurian, even on the festival of Easter,
was a meritorious act of justice and piety. <SPAN href="#link40note-122"
name="link40noteref-122" id="link40noteref-122">122</SPAN> If the captives
were condemned to domestic slavery, they maintained, with their sword or
dagger, the private quarrel of their masters; and it was found expedient
for the public tranquillity to prohibit the service of such dangerous
retainers. When their countryman Tarcalissaeus or Zeno ascended the
throne, he invited a faithful and formidable band of Isaurians, who
insulted the court and city, and were rewarded by an annual tribute of
five thousand pounds of gold. But the hopes of fortune depopulated the
mountains, luxury enervated the hardiness of their minds and bodies, and
in proportion as they mixed with mankind, they became less qualified for
the enjoyment of poor and solitary freedom. After the death of Zeno, his
successor Anastasius suppressed their pensions, exposed their persons to
the revenge of the people, banished them from Constantinople, and prepared
to sustain a war, which left only the alternative of victory or servitude.
A brother of the last emperor usurped the title of Augustus; his cause was
powerfully supported by the arms, the treasures, and the magazines,
collected by Zeno; and the native Isaurians must have formed the smallest
portion of the hundred and fifty thousand Barbarians under his standard,
which was sanctified, for the first time, by the presence of a fighting
bishop. Their disorderly numbers were vanquished in the plains of Phrygia
by the valor and discipline of the Goths; but a war of six years almost
exhausted the courage of the emperor. <SPAN href="#link40note-123"
name="link40noteref-123" id="link40noteref-123">123</SPAN> The Isaurians
retired to their mountains; their fortresses were successively besieged
and ruined; their communication with the sea was intercepted; the bravest
of their leaders died in arms; the surviving chiefs, before their
execution, were dragged in chains through the hippodrome; a colony of
their youth was transplanted into Thrace, and the remnant of the people
submitted to the Roman government. Yet some generations elapsed before
their minds were reduced to the level of slavery. The populous villages of
Mount Taurus were filled with horsemen and archers: they resisted the
imposition of tributes, but they recruited the armies of Justinian; and
his civil magistrates, the proconsul of Cappadocia, the count of Isauria,
and the praetors of Lycaonia and Pisidia, were invested with military
power to restrain the licentious practice of rapes and assassinations. <SPAN href="#link40note-124" name="link40noteref-124" id="link40noteref-124">124</SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN name="link40note-119" id="link40note-119">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
119 (<SPAN href="#link40noteref-119">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Turn back to vol. i.
p. 328. In the course of this History, I have sometimes mentioned, and
much oftener slighted, the hasty inroads of the Isaurians, which were not
attended with any consequences.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link40note-120" id="link40note-120">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
120 (<SPAN href="#link40noteref-120">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Trebellius Pollio in
Hist. August. p. 107, who lived under Diocletian, or Constantine. See
likewise Pancirolus ad Notit. Imp. Orient c. 115, 141. See Cod. Theodos.
l. ix. tit. 35, leg. 37, with a copious collective Annotation of Godefroy,
tom. iii. p. 256, 257.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link40note-121" id="link40note-121">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
121 (<SPAN href="#link40noteref-121">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ See the full and wide
extent of their inroads in Philostorgius (Hist. Eccles. l. xi. c. 8,) with
Godefroy's learned Dissertations.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link40note-122" id="link40note-122">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
122 (<SPAN href="#link40noteref-122">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Cod. Justinian. l.
ix. tit. 12, leg. 10. The punishments are severs—a fine of a hundred
pounds of gold, degradation, and even death. The public peace might afford
a pretence, but Zeno was desirous of monopolizing the valor and service of
the Isaurians.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link40note-123" id="link40note-123">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
123 (<SPAN href="#link40noteref-123">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ The Isaurian war and
the triumph of Anastasius are briefly and darkly represented by John
Malala, (tom. ii. p. 106, 107,) Evagrius, (l. iii. c. 35,) Theophanes, (p.
118—120,) and the Chronicle of Marcellinus.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link40note-124" id="link40note-124">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
124 (<SPAN href="#link40noteref-124">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Fortes ea regio (says
Justinian) viros habet, nec in ullo differt ab Isauria, though Procopius
(Persic. l. i. c. 18) marks an essential difference between their military
character; yet in former times the Lycaonians and Pisidians had defended
their liberty against the great king, Xenophon. (Anabasis, l. iii. c. 2.)
Justinian introduces some false and ridiculous erudition of the ancient
empire of the Pisidians, and of Lycaon, who, after visiting Rome, (long
before Aeenas,) gave a name and people to Lycaoni, (Novell. 24, 25, 27,
30.)]</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />