<h2><span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_57" id="Page_57">[57]</SPAN></span><SPAN name="CHAPTER_V" id="CHAPTER_V"></SPAN>CHAPTER V.</h2>
<p class="summary long">THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CONSPIRATORS ON THE DISCOVERY
OF THE PLOT—THEIR CAPTURE AT HOLBEACH—THE
MEETING OF PARLIAMENT.</p>
<p class="newsection"><span class="smcap">It</span> will now be necessary to look back a little on the movements
of the other conspirators. Fawkes remained to fire
the train and was secured, as is detailed in the last chapter.
On Tuesday morning, November 5th, as early as five o’clock,
one of the Wrights called on Thomas Winter, assuring
him that the whole plot was discovered. Wright stated,
that a nobleman had called on Lord Monteagle, bidding
him rise to accompany him to the earl of Northumberland’s,
where it was probably expected that Percy would be found.
This was only an hour after the return of the searching
party to Whitehall. Some of the conspirators were on the
watch in various parts of the town; and Wright chanced
to obtain the important information, which he communicated
to Winter. He heard the nobleman, who called
up Lord Monteagle, say, <i>The matter is discovered</i>. At
Winter’s request, Wright went back to Essex gate to learn
something further: in a short space he returned, adding, <i>All
is lost</i>. He found a man on horseback at Essex door, who
immediately rode at full gallop up Fleet Street. Winter
was conscious that they were seeking for Percy; and he
requested Wright to make him acquainted with all that had
taken place, in order that he might effect his escape.
Winter then quitted his lodging, being determined to ascertain
the worst. He went first to the court gates, which
were so guarded that no one could enter: he proceeded
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_58" id="Page_58">[58]</SPAN></span>onward towards the parliament house, but was prevented
from passing by the guard, which was posted in King
Street. As he came back he heard a person in the street
observe to another, that a treason was just discovered, in
which the king and the lords were to have been blown up
by gunpowder. Winter was now convinced that all was
discovered, and therefore he rode off into the country.
The two Wrights appear to have quitted London at the
same time.</p>
<p>Catesby, the leader of the conspirators, had left London
the preceding evening, in order that he might be prepared
to execute their project relative to the Princess Elizabeth
as soon as the blow should be struck. Percy also had departed
from London that morning as early as four o’clock,
probably from having received some information respecting
the discovery. They made the best of their way into
Warwickshire, where they had previously agreed to meet.</p>
<p>London was all in commotion as the day dawned: the
streets were thronged with spectators, all eagerly inquiring
what had taken place during the night. It was soon ascertained,
that a conspiracy had been providentially discovered,
and that one of the traitors was already in custody. The
satisfaction of the people was great at the intelligence, that
no danger now existed, and that the king and the parliament
were safe.</p>
<p>Fawkes was kept strictly guarded; and in a few days
made a confession of the principal circumstances of the
conspiracy.</p>
<p>The conspirators who had quitted London, previous to
the fifth of November, proceeded to the place of meeting
in Warwickshire. On Wednesday morning Grant and certain
others seized upon some horses, which had been
placed under the care of a riding-master. These horses
were to be used at the <i>hunting match</i> appointed by Digby.
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_59" id="Page_59">[59]</SPAN></span>Their object was to assemble large numbers of people under
the pretence of <i>hunting</i>, and then seize upon the Princess
Elizabeth. Having the princess in their possession, they
hoped to be able to succeed in effecting a complete change
in the government of the country. Had the plot succeeded
in London, most of the Papists would have joined them.
On Wednesday evening the conspirators who resided in the
country, as well as those who had quitted London before
the discovery, met at Sir Everard Digby’s according to
their previous arrangement.</p>
<p>It was now known that the plot was discovered; for
those who had left London on Tuesday morning brought
with them the intelligence. The question now agitated
related to their future movements; and it was determined
to make an attempt at open rebellion. This attempt shows
the desperate character of the men; for they could not
reasonably indulge in the expectation of success. They
accordingly mustered as many forces as they were able,
intending to await the issue of an encounter with the civil
power, and hoping, amid the confusion consequent upon
the discovery of the treason, to induce many members of
the church of Rome to join them. In one of the letters of
Sir Everard Digby, referred to in a subsequent page, a
clear and succinct account of their intended movements is
given:—“If the design had taken place, there could have
been no doubt of other success; for that night, before any
other could have brought the news, we should have known
it by Mr. Catesby, who should have proclaimed the heir
apparent at Charing-cross as he came out of town: to which
purpose there was a proclamation drawn: if the duke had
not been in the House then, there was a certain way laid for
the possessing him; but in regard of the assurance, they
should have been there, therefore the greatest of our business
stood in the possessing the Lady Elizabeth, who lying
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_60" id="Page_60">[60]</SPAN></span>within eight miles of Dunchurch, we would have easily surprised
before the knowledge of any doubt—this was the
cause of my being there.” They mustered to the number
of eighty persons only. From Warwickshire they passed
to the borders of Staffordshire. Sir Richard Verney, the
high sheriff of Warwickshire, pursued them. As they
rambled through the country, they seized upon such arms
and ammunition as fell in their way. On Friday, the 8th of
November, the conspirators reached the house of Stephen
Littleton, at Holbeach, in Staffordshire. The sheriff of
Worcestershire sent a trumpeter commanding them to surrender,
thinking that they were merely guilty of an ordinary
riot, for he had not yet heard of the conspiracy. In
those days intelligence was not so rapidly communicated,
from one part of the country to another, as in modern
times. The discovery took place on Tuesday morning
very early: and the assemblage at Littleton’s house was on
the Friday after; and yet the sheriff of Worcestershire had
received no information respecting the discovery of the
plot. The traitors, however, were not aware that the
sheriff was ignorant of their proceedings in London: on
the contrary, they imagined that he was sent after them by
a special order from the court. They prepared, therefore, to
defend themselves, being resolved to sell their lives as
dearly as possible.</p>
<p>The sheriff promised to intercede with his majesty in
their favour, on the condition of their surrendering themselves,
being unacquainted with their treason. Several
proclamations had been sent into the country after the conspirators,
in which the necessity of preserving Percy alive
was strongly urged. But in those days a hundred miles
were not soon travelled over. It is stated by contemporary
authorities that the roads were very bad at the time; while
another reason assigned for the slow travelling of the messengers,
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_61" id="Page_61">[61]</SPAN></span>who had carried the proclamations, is the shortness
of the days. It appears that travelling by night at that
time was never contemplated. Thus on the third day after
the discovery of the treason—the day on which the conspirators
met at Holbeach—the authorities in the counties, in
which the traitors were assembled, had received no tidings
even of the existence of a plot.</p>
<p>While they were occupied in making their preparations
in the house, a spark of fire dropped on about two pounds
of gunpowder, which had been laid on a plate near the
chimney, for the purpose of being dried. One of the party
chanced to throw a log of wood on the fire; this raised
the sparks, one of which fell on the powder, causing an explosion,
by which the roof of the house was blown off, and
the persons of Catesby, Rookwood, and Grant blackened
and scorched. It was remarkable that a bag of gunpowder,
of considerable size, which was lying in the room at the
time of the explosion, was blown into the court-yard without
being ignited, or none of the conspirators could have survived,
and thus the whole of the plot would have been for
ever enveloped in mystery. Catesby, Rookwood, and Grant
were partly disabled by the explosion, “so bearing in their
bodies,” says Fuller, “not στιγματα, <i>the marks of the Lord
Jesus Christ</i>, but the print of their own impieties.” As
the house had caught fire it was deemed necessary to open
the doors and attempt to escape; but when the bars of the
outer gates were removed to permit the conspirators to rush
forth, the sheriff's men rushed in, so that escape was impossible.
The battle now raged in the court-yard of the
house with great violence. Catesby and Percy placed
themselves back to back, and fought, though the former
had been partly disabled by the explosion, with desperate
courage. One of the sheriff’s men levelled his piece across
a wall, taking deliberate aim at Catesby and Percy, both of
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_62" id="Page_62">[62]</SPAN></span>whom fell by the same ball, the former dead on the spot,
and the latter mortally wounded<SPAN name="FNanchor_16_16" id="FNanchor_16_16"></SPAN><SPAN href="#Footnote_16_16" class="fnanchor">[16]</SPAN>. The two Wrights also
were slain, during the encounter in the court of Littleton’s
house; Rookwood and one of the Winters were wounded;
and the rest were taken prisoners.</p>
<p>As soon as possible after the struggle, the conspirators
were lodged by the sheriff in the county gaol. In a short
space they were removed to London: and during the
journey, and especially as they approached the metropolis,
the people came in vast crowds to obtain a sight of men,
who had concocted and almost executed so desperate a
treason. Every one wished to see the faces of men, whose
names and whose deeds were now resounded from one end
of the country to the other.</p>
<p>Tresham remained in London during the commotion
consequent upon the discovery of the plot. He was taken
in a short time and lodged in prison. Robert Winter
evaded the search that was made for him during a short
space, but at length was apprehended. Sir Everard Digby
was also taken. The actual conspirators were thirteen in
number; four were slain in the conflict at Holbeach; the
rest were all taken soon after the discovery of the plot.
Tresham confessed in prison his share in the transaction.
He died before the day appointed for their trial. Eight of
them were brought to trial early in the next year, as will
be noticed in a subsequent chapter.</p>
<p>On the 9th of November the parliament assembled.
The king addressed them on the occasion in a lengthened
speech, in which he dwelt on the proceedings of the traitors,
and on the policy of the measures which had been enacted
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_63" id="Page_63">[63]</SPAN></span>against recusants. James took a sort of review of all the
dangers to which he had been exposed, alluding especially
to the Gowry conspiracy. The speech abounds in good
sense, and sensible and judicious remarks are scattered over
all its parts. Alluding to the characters of the conspirators,
he very wisely observes, that there was nothing to induce
them to enter into this conspiracy, except a mistaken zeal
for their religion. He tells the lords and commons, that
as soon as the letter was shewn to him, he interpreted certain
expressions, contrary to the ordinary laws of grammar,
to refer to some explosion of gunpowder. Having
heard the speech from the throne, the parliament was adjourned
until the 21st of the ensuing January.</p>
<p>When the discovery of the plot was known on the Continent,
several of the sovereigns sent to congratulate the
king on his escape. In the case of some of these sovereigns,
their congratulations were sincere; but in other
cases the language of deceit must have been used. The
king of Spain and the pope, were among the most forward
to congratulate his majesty; and yet with great inconsistency
they sheltered and protected some of those individuals who
fled from their own country, and were privy to the conspiracy.
Osborn assures us, however, that the pope could
not refrain from laughing in the face of <i>Cardinal D’Ossat</i>,
when he informed him, that the Spanish monarch had sent
a special messenger to the English court for that express
purpose. Indeed, all these congratulations were hollow and
insincere; but they would have been exposed to censure as
men and as sovereigns, if they had not so far acted the part
of hypocrites as to pretend to rejoice at the escape of the
English monarch.</p>
<p>That the pope and the king of Spain, and some other
papal sovereigns, would have rejoiced at the success of the
plot, can scarcely be doubted, since their subsequent actions,
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_64" id="Page_64">[64]</SPAN></span>as will be noticed in another chapter, proved that they
favoured those who were privy to the conspiracy. It can
scarcely indeed be doubted that the Spanish sovereign, and
his holiness, and perhaps some other sovereigns, were
acquainted with the designs of the conspirators; at all
events, if they were not aware of the particulars of the
plot, they knew that some conspiracy was in agitation,
which was intended to be executed during that winter.
Many of the Romanists on the Continent knew that some
great deed was to be attempted, though they did not know
the particulars.</p>
<p>The parliament did not meet on the 5th of November;
but the following entry stands on the journals of the House
of Commons under that date:—“This last night the upper
house of parliament was searched by Sir Thomas Knevett;
and one <i>Johnson</i>, servant to Mr. Thomas Percye, was there
apprehended, who had placed thirty-six barrels of gunpowder
in the vault under the house, with a purpose to
blow up the king and the whole company when they should
there assemble. Afterwards, divers other gentlemen were
discovered to be of the plot<SPAN name="FNanchor_17_17" id="FNanchor_17_17"></SPAN><SPAN href="#Footnote_17_17" class="fnanchor">[17]</SPAN>.”</p>
<p>On the 21st of January, the two houses assembled according
to the previous arrangement, when a committee was formed
“to consider the laws already in force, that tend to the
preservation of religion—what defects are in the execution
of them, or what new laws may be thought needful<SPAN name="FNanchor_18_18" id="FNanchor_18_18"></SPAN><SPAN href="#Footnote_18_18" class="fnanchor">[18]</SPAN>.” The
lord chancellor gave special directions to the clerk to notice
the peers who should fail to attend in their places; for
there was a suspicion that certain Roman Catholic lords
were implicated in the treason. Some were in consequence
imprisoned and fined. In the House of Commons the same
subject was discussed the first day of the session. The
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_65" id="Page_65">[65]</SPAN></span>minds of men indeed could dwell on nothing else; nor is it
surprising that such was the case; for a most horrible plot
had been discovered, and the traitors were already in prison
awaiting the sentence of the law. At length a committee
was appointed to decide upon some course to be taken
against <i>jesuits</i>, <i>seminaries</i>, and other <i>papal agents</i>.</p>
<p>The conspirators were tried and convicted at common
law, as will be related in the next chapter; but the parliament
seemed anxious to award some new punishment, beyond
that which was ordinarily inflicted on traitors, on such
culprits, for the purpose of marking their sense of their
crime. Accordingly a committee was appointed in the lords
to consider what extraordinary punishments should be inflicted.
While they were engaged in this business, it was
reported to the house, that it was not convenient to delay
longer the trial of the conspirators, and therefore the matter
dropped. The commons were no less anxious on the subject
than the lords. The question was debated at some
length; but at last it was determined, that the conspirators
should be left to the ordinary courts of justice. On the
25th of January, however, the commons framed and passed
a bill, which was sent up to the lords, entitled, <i>“An Act
for Appointing a Thanksgiving to Almighty God every
year on the Fifth of November.”</i> When the bill was
carried to the lords, the messengers stated, “that the whole
body of the commons having entered into consideration of
the great blessing of God, in the happy preservation of his
majesty and the state, from the late most dangerous treason
intended to have been attempted by the instigation of
<i>jesuits</i>, <i>seminaries</i>, and <i>Romish priests</i>, had framed and
passed the said bill in their house, as the first fruits of their
labours, in this session of parliament, which they did very
earnestly recommend to their lordships.” The lords read
and passed the bill in three days, without even going into a
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_66" id="Page_66">[66]</SPAN></span>committee. This act is, therefore, the <i>first</i> in the printed
statutes of the session. Several bills were passed against
recusants and as a protection to the Protestant religion. On
the 27th of May the session was terminated<SPAN name="FNanchor_19_19" id="FNanchor_19_19"></SPAN><SPAN href="#Footnote_19_19" class="fnanchor">[19]</SPAN>.</p>
<p>It may be mentioned, that the ceremony of examining
the vaults is performed at the commencement of every
session. Whether indeed it has been continued since the
destruction of the two houses by fire, I am unable to determine;
but as the cellar must still remain, I should imagine
that the ceremony is still repeated. At all events, such
was the case prior to the fire. The cellar is still designated
Guy Fawkes’s Cellar.</p>
<div class="footnotes"><p class="footnotetitle">Footnotes:</p>
<div class="footnote"><p><SPAN name="Footnote_16_16" id="Footnote_16_16"></SPAN><SPAN href="#FNanchor_16_16"><span class="label">[16]</span></SPAN> “Never,” says Fuller, “were two bad men’s deaths more generally
lamented of all good men: only on this account, that they lived
no longer to be forced to a further discovery of their secret associates.”—Book
x. 36.</p>
</div>
<div class="footnote"><p><SPAN name="Footnote_17_17" id="Footnote_17_17"></SPAN><SPAN href="#FNanchor_17_17"><span class="label">[17]</span></SPAN> <i>Parl. Hist.</i> v. 125.</p>
</div>
<div class="footnote"><p><SPAN name="Footnote_18_18" id="Footnote_18_18"></SPAN><SPAN href="#FNanchor_18_18"><span class="label">[18]</span></SPAN> Ibid. v. 141.</p>
</div>
<div class="footnote"><p><SPAN name="Footnote_19_19" id="Footnote_19_19"></SPAN><SPAN href="#FNanchor_19_19"><span class="label">[19]</span></SPAN> During this session an Act was passed, by which every one was
obliged to take the oath of allegiance—“a very moderate test,” says
Hume, “since it decided no controverted points between the two
religions, and only engaged the persons who took it to abjure the
pope’s power of dethroning kings.” Mr. Hallam’s testimony is
equally conclusive: “We cannot wonder that a parliament so narrowly
rescued from personal destruction, endeavoured to draw the
cord still tighter round these dangerous enemies. The statute passed
on this occasion is by no means more harsh than might be expected.”—<i>Const.
Hist.</i> i. 554-5.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />