<h3>DIALOGUE XXXI.</h3>
<p><span class="smcap">Aristides</span>—<span class="smcap">Phocion</span>—<span class="smcap">Demosthenes</span>.</p>
<p><i>Aristides</i>.—How could it happen that Athens, after having
recovered an equality with Sparta, should be forced to submit to the
dominion of Macedon when she had two such great men as Phocion and Demosthenes
at the head of her State?</p>
<p><i>Phocion</i>.—It happened because our opinions of her interests
in foreign affairs were totally different; which made us act with a
constant and pernicious opposition the one to the other.</p>
<p><i>Aristides</i>.—I wish to hear from you both (if you will
indulge my curiosity) on what principles you could form such contrary
judgments concerning points of such moment to the safety of your country,
which you equally loved.</p>
<p><i>Demosthenes</i>.—My principles were the same with yours,
Aristides. I laboured to maintain the independence of Athens against
the encroaching ambition of Macedon, as you had maintained it against
that of Persia. I saw that our own strength was unequal to the
enterprise; but what we could not do alone I thought might be done by
a union of the principal states of Greece—such a union as had
been formed by you and Themistocles in opposition to the Persians.
To effect this was the great, the constant aim of my policy; and, though
traversed in it by many whom the gold of Macedon had corrupted, and
by Phocion, whom alone, of all the enemies to my system, I must acquit
of corruption, I so far succeeded, that I brought into the field <!-- page 184--><SPAN name="page184"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span>of
Chæronea an army equal to Philip’s. The event was
unfortunate; but Aristides will not judge of the merits of a statesman
by the accidents of war.</p>
<p><i>Phocion</i>.—Do not imagine, Aristides, that I was less
desirous than Demosthenes to preserve the independence and liberty of
my country. But, before I engaged the Athenians in a war not absolutely
necessary, I thought it proper to consider what the event of a battle
would probably be. That which I feared came to pass: the Macedonians
were victorious, and Athens was ruined.</p>
<p><i>Demosthenes</i>.—Would Athens not have been ruined if no
battle had been fought? Could you, Phocion, think it safety to
have our freedom depend on the moderation of Philip? And what
had we else to protect us, if no confederacy had been formed to resist
his ambition?</p>
<p><i>Phocion</i>.—I saw no wisdom in accelerating the downfall
of my country by a rash activity in provoking the resentment of an enemy,
whose arms, I foretold, would in the issue prove superior, not only
to ours, but to those of any confederacy we were able to form.
My maxim was, that a state which cannot make itself stronger than any
of its neighbours, should live in friendship with that power which is
the strongest. But the more apparent it was that our strength
was inferior to that of Macedon, the more you laboured to induce us,
by all the vehemence of your oratory, to take such measures as tended
to render Philip our enemy, and exasperate him more against us than
any other nation. This I thought a rash conduct. It was
not by orations that the dangerous war you had kindled could finally
be determined; nor did your triumphs over me in an assembly of the people
intimidate any Macedonian in the field of Chæronea, or stop you
yourself from flying out of that field.</p>
<p><i>Demosthenes</i>.—My flight from thence, I must own, was
ignominious to me; but it affects not the question we are agitating
now, whether the counsels I gave to the people of <!-- page 185--><SPAN name="page185"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span>Athens,
as a statesman and a public minister, were right or wrong. When
first I excited them to make war against Philip, the victories gained
by Chabrias, in which you, Phocion, had a share (particularly that of
Naxos, which completely restored to us the empire of the sea), had enabled
us to maintain, not only our own liberty, but that of all Greece, in
the defence of which we had formerly acquired so much glory, and which
our ancestors thought so important to the safety and independence of
Athens. Philip’s power was but beginning, and supported
itself more by craft than force. I saw, and I warned my countrymen
in due time, how impolitic it would be to suffer his machinations to
be carried on with success, and his strength to increase by continual
acquisitions, without resistance. I exposed the weakness of that
narrow, that short-sighted policy, which looked no farther than to our
own immediate borders, and imagined that whatsoever lay out of those
bounds was foreign to our interests, and unworthy of our care.
The force of my remonstrances roused the Athenians to a more vigilant
conduct. Then it was that the orators whom Philip had corrupted
loudly inveighed against me, as alarming the people with imaginary dangers,
and drawing them into quarrels in which they had really no concern.
This language, and the fair professions of Philip, who was perfectly
skilled in the royal art of dissembling, were often so prevalent, that
many favourable opportunities of defeating his designs were unhappily
lost. Yet sometimes, by the spirit with which I animated the Athenians
and other neighbouring states, I stopped the progress of his arms, and
opposed to him such obstacles as cost him much time and much labour
to remove. You yourself, Phocion, at the head of fleets and armies
sent against him by decrees which I had proposed, vanquished his troops
in Eubæa, and saved from him Byzantium, with other cities of our
allies on the coasts of the Hellespont, from which you drove him with
shame.</p>
<p><!-- page 186--><SPAN name="page186"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span><i>Phocion</i>.—The
proper use of those advantages was to secure a peace to Athens, which
they inclined him to keep. His ambition was checked, but his forces
were not so much diminished as to render it safe to provoke him to further
hostilities.</p>
<p><i>Demosthenes</i>.—His courage and policy were indeed so superior
to ours that, notwithstanding his defeats, he was soon in a condition
to pursue the great plan of conquest and dominion which he had formed
long before, and from which he never desisted. Thus, through indolence
on our side and activity on his, things were brought to such a crisis
that I saw no hope of delivering all Greece from his yoke, but by confederating
against him the Athenians and the Thebans, which league I effected.
Was it not better to fight for the independence of our country in conjunction
with Thebes than alone? Would a battle lost in Bœotia be
so fatal to Athens as one lost in our own territory and under our own
walls?</p>
<p><i>Phocion</i>.—You may remember that when you were eagerly
urging this argument I desired you to consider, not where we should
fight, but how we should be conquerors; for, if we were vanquished,
all sorts of evils and dangers would be instantly at our gates.</p>
<p><i>Aristides</i>.—Did not you tell me, Demosthenes, when you
began to speak upon this subject, that you brought into the field of
Chæronea an army equal to Philip’s?</p>
<p><i>Demosthenes</i>.—I did, and believe that Phocion will not
contradict me.</p>
<p><i>Aristides</i>.—But, though equal in number, it was, perhaps,
much inferior to the Macedonians in valour and military discipline.</p>
<p><i>Demosthenes</i>.—The courage shown by our army excited the
admiration of Philip himself, and their discipline was inferior to none
in Greece.</p>
<p><i>Aristides</i>.—What then occasioned their defeat?</p>
<p><i>Demosthenes</i>.—The bad conduct of their generals.</p>
<p><!-- page 187--><SPAN name="page187"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span><i>Aristides</i>.—Why
was the command not given to Phocion, whose abilities had been proved
on so many other occasions? Was it offered to him, and did he
refuse to accept it? You are silent, Demosthenes. I understand
your silence. You are unwilling to tell me that, having the power,
by your influence over the people, to confer the command on what Athenian
you pleased, you were induced, by the spirit of party, to lay aside
a great general who had been always successful, who had the chief confidence
of your troops and of your allies, in order to give it to men zealous
indeed for your measures and full of military ardour, but of little
capacity or experience in the conduct of a war. You cannot plead
that, if Phocion had led your troops against Philip, there was any danger
of his basely betraying his trust. Phocion could not be a traitor.
You had seen him serve the Republic and conquer for it in wars, the
undertaking of which he had strenuously opposed, in wars with Philip.
How could you then be so negligent of the safety of your country as
not to employ him in this, the most dangerous of all she ever had waged?
If Chares and Lysicles, the two generals you chose to conduct it, had
commanded the Grecian forces at Marathon and Platæa we should
have lost those battles. All the men whom you sent to fight the
Macedonians under such leaders were victims to the animosity between
you and Phocion, which made you deprive them of the necessary benefit
of his wise direction. This I think the worst blemish of your
administration. In other parts of your conduct I not only acquit
but greatly applaud and admire you. With the sagacity of a most
consummate statesman you penetrated the deepest designs of Philip, you
saw all the dangers which threatened Greece from that quarter while
they were yet at a distance, you exhorted your countrymen to make a
timely provision for their future security, you spread the alarm through
all the neighbouring states, you combined the most powerful in a confederacy
with Athens, you carried the war out of Attica, <!-- page 188--><SPAN name="page188"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span>which
(let Phocion say what he will) was safer than meeting it there, you
brought it, after all that had been done by the enemy to strengthen
himself and weaken us, after the loss of Amphipolis, Olynthus, and Potidæa,
the outguards of Athens, you brought it, I say, to the decision of a
battle with equal forces. When this could be effected there was
evidently nothing so desperate in our circumstances as to justify an
inaction which might probably make them worse, but could not make them
better. Phocion thinks that a state which cannot itself be the
strongest should live in friendship with that power which is the strongest.
But in my opinion such friendship is no better than servitude.
It is more advisable to endeavour to supply what is wanting in our own
strength by a conjunction with others who are equally in danger.
This method of preventing the ruin of our country was tried by Demosthenes.
Nor yet did he neglect, by all practicable means, to augment at the
same time our internal resources. I have heard that when he found
the Public Treasure exhausted he replenished it, with very great peril
to himself, by bringing into it money appropriated before to the entertainment
of the people, against the express prohibition of a popular law, which
made it death to propose the application thereof to any other use.
This was virtue, this was true and genuine patriotism. He owed
all his importance and power in the State to the favour of the people;
yet, in order to serve the State, he did not fear, at the evident hazard
of his life, to offend their darling passion and appeal against it to
their reason.</p>
<p><i>Phocion</i>.—For this action I praise him. It was,
indeed, far more dangerous for a minister at Athens to violate that
absurd and extravagant law than any of those of Solon. But though
he restored our finances, he could not restore our lost virtue; he could
not give that firm health, that vigour to the State, which is the result
of pure morals, of strict order and civil discipline, of integrity in
the old, and <!-- page 189--><SPAN name="page189"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span>obedience
in the young. I therefore dreaded a conflict with the solid strength
of Macedon, where corruption had yet made but a very small progress,
and was happy that Demosthenes did not oblige me, against my own inclination,
to be the general of such a people in such war.</p>
<p><i>Aristides</i>.—I fear that your just contempt of the greater
number of those who composed the democracy so disgusted you with this
mode and form of government, that you were as averse to serve under
it as others with less ability and virtue than you were desirous of
obtruding themselves into its service. But though such a reluctance
proceeds from a very noble cause, and seems agreeable to the dignity
of a great mind in bad times, yet it is a fault against the highest
of moral obligations—the love of our country. For, how unworthy
soever individuals may be, the public is always respectable, always
dear to the virtuous.</p>
<p><i>Phocion</i>.—True; but no obligation can lie upon a citizen
to seek a public charge when he foresees that his obtaining of it will
be useless to his country. Would you have had me solicit the command
of an army which I believed would be beaten?</p>
<p><i>Aristides</i>.—It is not permitted to a State to despair
of its safety till its utmost efforts have been made without success.
If you had commanded the army at Chæronea you might possibly have
changed the event of the day; but, if you had not, you would have died
more honourably there than in a prison at Athens, betrayed by a vain
confidence in the insecure friendship of a perfidious Macedonian.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />