<h4><SPAN name="XIX" id="XIX" />XIX</h4>
<h4>AGENT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN LONDON</h4>
<p><ANTIMG src="images/block-o.jpg" class="floatLeft" alt=
"block-O" />UR new governor, Captain Denny, brought over for me the
before mentioned medal from the Royal Society, which he presented
to me at an entertainment given him by the city. He accompanied it
with very polite expressions of his esteem for me, having, as he
said, been long acquainted with my character. After dinner, when
the company, as was customary at that time, were engag'd in
drinking, he took me aside into another room, and acquainted me
that he had been advis'd by his friends in England to cultivate a
friendship with me, as one who was capable of giving him the best
advice, and of contributing most effectually to the making his
administration easy; that he therefore desired of all things to
have a good understanding with me, and he begged me to be assured
of his readiness on all occasions to render me every service that
might be in his power. He said much to me, also, of the
proprietor's good disposition towards the province, and of the
advantage it might be to us all, and to me in particular, if the
opposition that had been so long continu'd to his measures was
dropt, and harmony restor'd between him and the people; in
effecting which, it was thought no one could be more serviceable
than myself; and I might depend on adequate acknowledgments and
recompenses, etc., etc. The drinkers, finding we did not return
immediately to the table, sent us a decanter of Madeira, which the
governor made liberal use of, and in proportion became more profuse
of his solicitations and promises.</p>
<p>My answers were to this purpose: that my circumstances, thanks
to God, were such as to make proprietary favours unnecessary to me;
and that, being a member of the Assembly, I could not possibly
accept of any; that, however, I had no personal enmity to the
proprietary, and that, whenever the public measures he propos'd
should appear to be for the good of the people, no one should
espouse and forward them more zealously than myself; my past
opposition having been founded on this, that the measures which had
been urged were evidently intended to serve the proprietary
interest, with great prejudice to that of the people; that I was
much obliged to him (the governor) for his professions of regard to
me, and that he might rely on everything in my power to make his
administration as easy as possible, hoping at the same time that he
had not brought with him the same unfortunate instruction his
predecessor had been hampered with.</p>
<p>On this he did not then explain himself; but when he afterwards
came to do business with the Assembly, they appear'd again, the
disputes were renewed, and I was as active as ever in the
opposition, being the penman, first, of the request to have a
communication of the instructions, and then of the remarks upon
them, which may be found in the votes of the time, and in the
Historical Review I afterward publish'd. But between us personally
no enmity arose; we were often together; he was a man of letters,
had seen much of the world, and was very entertaining and pleasing
in conversation. He gave me the first information that my old
friend Jas. Ralph was still alive; that he was esteem'd one of the
best political writers in England; had been employed in the
dispute<SPAN name="FNanchor_111" id="FNanchor_111" /><SPAN href=
"#Footnote_111" class="fnanchor">[111]</SPAN> between Prince Frederic
and the king, and had obtain'd a pension of three hundred a year;
that his reputation was indeed small as a poet, Pope having damned
his poetry in the <i>Dunciad</i>,<SPAN name="FNanchor_112" id=
"FNanchor_112" /><SPAN href="#Footnote_112" class="fnanchor">[112]</SPAN>
but his prose was thought as good as any man's.</p>
<p>The Assembly finally finding the proprietary obstinately
persisted in manacling their deputies with instructions
inconsistent not only with the privileges of the people, but with
the service of the crown, resolv'd to petition the king against
them, and appointed me their agent to go over to England, to
present and support the petition. The House had sent up a bill to
the governor, granting a sum of sixty thousand pounds for the
king's use (ten thousand pounds of which was subjected to the
orders of the then general, Lord Loudoun), which the governor
absolutely refus'd to pass, in compliance with his
instructions.</p>
<p>I had agreed with Captain Morris, of the packet at New York, for
my passage, and my stores were put on board, when Lord Loudoun
arriv'd at Philadelphia, expressly, as he told me, to endeavour an
accommodation between the governor and Assembly, that his majesty's
service might not be obstructed by their dissensions. Accordingly,
he desir'd the governor and myself to meet him, that he might hear
what was to be said on both sides. We met and discussed the
business. In behalf of the Assembly, I urged all the various
arguments that may be found in the public papers of that time,
which were of my writing, and are printed with the minutes of the
Assembly; and the governor pleaded his instructions, the bond he
had given to observe them, and his ruin if he disobey'd, yet seemed
not unwilling to hazard himself if Lord Loudoun would advise it.
This his lordship did not chuse to do, though I once thought I had
nearly prevail'd with him to do it; but finally he rather chose to
urge the compliance of the Assembly; and he entreated me to use my
endeavours with them for that purpose, declaring that he would
spare none of the king's troops for the defense of our frontiers,
and that, if we did not continue to provide for that defense
ourselves, they must remain expos'd to the enemy.</p>
<p>I acquainted the House with what had pass'd, and, presenting
them with a set of resolutions I had drawn up, declaring our
rights, and that we did not relinquish our claim to those rights,
but only suspended the exercise of them on this occasion thro'
<i>force</i>, against which we protested, they at length agreed to
drop that bill, and frame another conformable to the proprietary
instructions. This of course the governor pass'd, and I was then at
liberty to proceed on my voyage. But, in the meantime, the packet
had sailed with my sea-stores, which was some loss to me, and my
only recompense was his lordship's thanks for my service, all the
credit of obtaining the accommodation falling to his share.</p>
<p>He set out for New York before me; and, as the time for
dispatching the packet-boats was at his disposition, and there were
two then remaining there, one of which, he said, was to sail very
soon, I requested to know the precise time, that I might not miss
her by any delay of mine. His answer was, "I have given out that
she is to sail on Saturday next; but I may let you know, <i>entre
nous</i>, that if you are there by Monday morning, you will be in
time, but do not delay longer." By some accidental hindrance at a
ferry, it was Monday noon before I arrived, and I was much afraid
she might have sailed, as the wind was fair; but I was soon made
easy by the information that she was still in the harbor, and would
not move till the next day. One would imagine that I was now on the
very point of departing for Europe. I thought so; but I was not
then so well acquainted with his lordship's character, of which
<i>indecision</i> was one of the strongest features. I shall give
some instances. It was about the beginning of April that I came to
New York, and I think it was near the end of June before we sail'd.
There were then two of the packet-boats, which had been long in
port, but were detained for the general's letters, which were
always to be ready to-morrow. Another packet arriv'd; she too was
detain'd; and, before we sail'd, a fourth was expected. Ours was
the first to be dispatch'd, as having been there longest.
Passengers were engaged in all, and some extremely impatient to be
gone, and the merchants uneasy about their letters, and the orders
they had given for insurance (it being war time) for fall goods;
but their anxiety avail'd nothing; his lordship's letters were not
ready; and yet whoever waited on him found him always at his desk,
pen in hand, and concluded he must needs write abundantly.</p>
<p>Going myself one morning to pay my respects, I found in his
antechamber one Innis, a messenger of Philadelphia, who had come
from thence express with a packet from Governor Denny for the
general. He delivered to me some letters from my friends there,
which occasion'd my inquiring when he was to return, and where he
lodg'd, that I might send some letters by him. He told me he was
order'd to call to-morrow at nine for the general's answer to the
governor, and should set off immediately. I put my letters into his
hands the same day. A fortnight after I met him again in the same
place. "So, you are soon return'd, Innis?" "<i>Return'd</i>! no, I
am not <i>gone</i> yet." "How so?" "I have called here by order
every morning these two weeks past for his lordship's letter, and
it is not yet ready." "Is it possible, when he is so great a
writer? for I see him constantly at his escritoire." "Yes," says
Innis, "but he is like St. George on the signs, <i>always on
horseback, and never rides on</i>." This observation of the
messenger was, it seems, well founded; for, when in England, I
understood that Mr. Pitt<SPAN name="FNanchor_113" id=
"FNanchor_113" /><SPAN href="#Footnote_113" class="fnanchor">[113]</SPAN>
gave it as one reason for removing this general, and sending
Generals Amherst and Wolfe, <i>that the minister never heard from
him, and could not know what he was doing</i>.</p>
<p>This daily expectation of sailing, and all the three packets
going down to Sandy Hook, to join the fleet there, the passengers
thought it best to be on board, lest by a sudden order the ships
should sail, and they be left behind. There, if I remember right,
we were about six weeks, consuming our sea-stores, and oblig'd to
procure more. At length the fleet sail'd, the general and all his
army on board, bound to Louisburg, with the intent to besiege and
take that fortress; all the packet-boats in company ordered to
attend the general's ship, ready to receive his dispatches when
they should be ready. We were out five days before we got a letter
with leave to part, and then our ship quitted the fleet and steered
for England. The other two packets he still detained, carried them
with him to Halifax, where he stayed some time to exercise the men
in sham attacks upon sham forts, then altered his mind as to
besieging Louisburg, and returned to New York, with all his troops,
together with the two packets above mentioned, and all their
passengers! During his absence the French and savages had taken
Fort George, on the frontier of that province, and the savages had
massacred many of the garrison after capitulation.</p>
<p>I saw afterwards in London Captain Bonnell, who commanded one of
those packets. He told me that, when he had been detain'd a month,
he acquainted his lordship that his ship was grown foul, to a
degree that must necessarily hinder her fast sailing, a point of
consequence for a packet-boat, and requested an allowance of time
to heave her down and clean her bottom. He was asked how long time
that would require. He answered, three days. The general replied,
"If you can do it in one day, I give leave; otherwise not; for you
must certainly sail the day after to-morrow." So he never obtain'd
leave, though detained afterwards from day to day during full three
months.</p>
<p>I saw also in London one of Bonnell's passengers, who was so
enrag'd against his lordship for deceiving and detaining him so
long at New York, and then carrying him to Halifax and back again,
that he swore he would sue him for damages. Whether he did or not,
I never heard; but, as he represented the injury to his affairs, it
was very considerable.</p>
<p>On the whole, I wonder'd much how such a man came to be
intrusted<SPAN name="FNanchor_114" id="FNanchor_114" /><SPAN href=
"#Footnote_114" class="fnanchor">[114]</SPAN> with so important a
business as the conduct of a great army; but, having since seen
more of the great world, and the means of obtaining, and motives
for giving places, my wonder is diminished. General Shirley, on
whom the command of the army devolved upon the death of Braddock,
would, in my opinion, if continued in place, have made a much
better campaign than that of Loudoun in 1757, which was frivolous,
expensive, and disgraceful to our nation beyond conception; for,
tho' Shirley was not a bred soldier, he was sensible and sagacious
in himself, and attentive to good advice from others, capable of
forming judicious plans, and quick and active in carrying them into
execution. Loudoun, instead of defending the colonies with his
great army, left them totally expos'd while he paraded idly at
Halifax, by which means Fort George was lost, besides, he derang'd
all our mercantile operations, and distress'd our trade, by a long
embargo on the exportation of provisions, on pretence of keeping
supplies from being obtain'd by the enemy, but in reality for
beating down their price in favour of the contractors, in whose
profits, it was said, perhaps from suspicion only, he had a share.
And, when at length the embargo was taken off, by neglecting to
send notice of it to Charlestown, the Carolina fleet was detain'd
near three months longer, whereby their bottoms were so much
damaged by the worm that a great part of them foundered in their
passage home.</p>
<p>Shirley was, I believe, sincerely glad of being relieved from so
burdensome a charge as the conduct of an army must be to a man
unacquainted with military business. I was at the entertainment
given by the city of New York to Lord Loudoun, on his taking upon
him the command. Shirley, tho' thereby superseded, was present
also. There was a great company of officers, citizens, and
strangers, and, some chairs having been borrowed in the
neighborhood, there was one among them very low, which fell to the
lot of Mr. Shirley. Perceiving it as I sat by him, I said, "They
have given you, sir, too low a seat." "No matter," says he, "Mr.
Franklin, I find <i>a low seat</i> the easiest."</p>
<p><SPAN name="pg308" id="pg308" />While I was, as afore mention'd,
detain'd at New York, I receiv'd all the accounts of the
provisions, etc., that I had furnish'd to Braddock, some of which
accounts could not sooner be obtain'd from the different persons I
had employ'd to assist in the business. I presented them to Lord
Loudoun, desiring to be paid the balance. He caus'd them to be
regularly examined by the proper officer, who, after comparing
every article with its voucher, certified them to be right; and the
balance due for which his lordship promis'd to give me an order on
the paymaster. This was, however, put off from time to time; and
tho' I call'd often for it by appointment, I did not get it. At
length, just before my departure, he told me he had, on better
consideration, concluded not to mix his accounts with those of his
predecessors. "And you," says he, "when in England, have only to
exhibit your accounts at the treasury, and you will be paid
immediately."</p>
<p>I mention'd, but without effect, the great and unexpected
expense I had been put to by being detain'd so long at New York, as
a reason for my desiring to be presently paid; and on my observing
that it was not right I should be put to any further trouble or
delay in obtaining the money I had advanc'd, as I charged no
commission for my service, "O, Sir," says he, "you must not think
of persuading us that you are no gainer; we understand better those
affairs, and know that every one concerned in supplying the army
finds means, in the doing it, to fill his own pockets." I assur'd
him that was not my case, and that I had not pocketed a farthing;
but he appear'd clearly not to believe me; and, indeed, I have
since learnt that immense fortunes are often made in such
employments. As to my balance, I am not paid it to this day, of
which more hereafter.</p>
<p>Our captain of the packet had boasted much, before we sailed, of
the swiftness of his ship; unfortunately, when we came to sea, she
proved the dullest of ninety-six sail, to his no small
mortification. After many conjectures respecting the cause, when we
were near another ship almost as dull as ours, which, however,
gain'd upon us, the captain ordered all hands to come aft, and
stand as near the ensign staff as possible. We were, passengers
included, about forty persons. While we stood there, the ship
mended her pace, and soon left her neighbour far behind, which
prov'd clearly what our captain suspected, that she was loaded too
much by the head. The casks of water, it seems, had been all plac'd
forward; these he therefore order'd to be mov'd further aft, on
which the ship recover'd her character, and proved the best sailer
in the fleet.</p>
<p>The captain said she had once gone at the rate of thirteen
knots, which is accounted thirteen miles per hour. We had on board,
as a passenger, Captain Kennedy, of the Navy, who contended that it
was impossible, and that no ship ever sailed so fast, and that
there must have been some error in the division of the log-line, or
some mistake in heaving the log.<SPAN name="FNanchor_115" id=
"FNanchor_115" /><SPAN href="#Footnote_115" class="fnanchor">[115]</SPAN>
A wager ensu'd between the two captains, to be decided when there
should be sufficient wind. Kennedy thereupon examin'd rigorously
the log-line, and, being satisfi'd with that, he determin'd to
throw the log himself. Accordingly some days after, when the wind
blew very fair and fresh, and the captain of the packet, Lutwidge,
said he believ'd she then went at the rate of thirteen knots,
Kennedy made the experiment, and own'd his wager lost.</p>
<p>The above fact I give for the sake of the following observation.
It has been remark'd, as an imperfection in the art of
ship-building, that it can never be known, till she is tried,
whether a new ship will or will not be a good sailer; for that the
model of a good-sailing ship has been exactly follow'd in a new
one, which has prov'd, on the contrary, remarkably dull. I
apprehend that this may partly be occasion'd by the different
opinions of seamen respecting the modes of lading, rigging, and
sailing of a ship; each has his system; and the same vessel, laden
by the judgment and orders of one captain, shall sail better or
worse than when by the orders of another. Besides, it scarce ever
happens that a ship is form'd, fitted for the sea, and sail'd by
the same person. One man builds the hull, another rigs her, a third
lades and sails her. No one of these has the advantage of knowing
all the ideas and experience of the others, and, therefore, cannot
draw just conclusions from a combination of the whole.</p>
<p>Even in the simple operation of sailing when at sea, I have
often observ'd different judgments in the officers who commanded
the successive watches, the wind being the same. One would have the
sails trimm'd sharper or flatter than another, so that they seem'd
to have no certain rule to govern by. Yet I think a set of
experiments might be instituted; first, to determine the most
proper form of the hull for swift sailing; next, the best
dimensions and properest place for the masts; then the form and
quantity of sails, and their position, as the wind may be; and,
lastly, the disposition of the lading. This is an age of
experiments, and I think a set accurately made and combin'd would
be of great use. I am persuaded, therefore, that ere long some
ingenious philosopher will undertake it, to whom I wish
success.</p>
<div class="figcenter"><ANTIMG width-obs="60%" src= "images/illus-034-red.jpg" alt="Sailboat" title="Sailing ship" /></div>
<p>We were several times chas'd in our passage, but out-sail'd
every thing, and in thirty days had soundings. We had a good
observation, and the captain judg'd himself so near our port,
Falmouth, that, if we made a good run in the night, we might be off
the mouth of that harbor in the morning, and by running in the
night might escape the notice of the enemy's privateers, who often
cruis'd near the entrance of the channel. Accordingly, all the sail
was set that we could possibly make, and the wind being very fresh
and fair, we went right before it, and made great way. The captain,
after his observation, shap'd his course, as he thought, so as to
pass wide of the Scilly Isles; but it seems there is sometimes a
strong indraught setting up St. George's Channel, which deceives
seamen and caused the loss of Sir Cloudesley Shovel's squadron.
This indraught was probably the cause of what happened to us.</p>
<p>We had a watchman plac'd in the bow, to whom they often called,
"<i>Look well out before there</i>," and he as often answered,
"<i>Ay, ay</i>"; but perhaps had his eyes shut, and was half asleep
at the time, they sometimes answering, as is said, mechanically;
for he did not see a light just before us, which had been hid by
the studding-sails from the man at the helm, and from the rest of
the watch, but by an accidental yaw of the ship was discover'd, and
occasion'd a great alarm, we being very near it, the light
appearing to me as big as a cartwheel. It was midnight, and our
captain fast asleep; but Captain Kennedy, jumping upon deck, and
seeing the danger, ordered the ship to wear round, all sails
standing; an operation dangerous to the masts, but it carried us
clear, and we escaped shipwreck, for we were running right upon the
rocks on which the lighthouse was erected. This deliverance
impressed me strongly with the utility of lighthouses, and made me
resolve to encourage the building more of them in America if I
should live to return there.</p>
<p>In the morning it was found by the soundings, etc., that we were
near our port, but a thick fog hid the land from our sight. About
nine o'clock the fog began to rise, and seem'd to be lifted up from
the water like the curtain at a play-house, discovering underneath,
the town of Falmouth, the vessels in its harbor, and the fields
that surrounded it. This was a most pleasing spectacle to those who
had been so long without any other prospects than the uniform view
of a vacant ocean, and it gave us the more pleasure as we were now
free from the anxieties which the state of war occasion'd.</p>
<p>I set out immediately, with my son, for London, and we only
stopt a little by the way to view Stonehenge<SPAN name="FNanchor_116" id="FNanchor_116" /><SPAN href="#Footnote_116" class=
"fnanchor">[116]</SPAN> on Salisbury Plain, and Lord Pembroke's house
and gardens, with his very curious antiquities at Wilton. We
arrived in London the 27th of July, 1757.<SPAN name="FNanchor_117" id=
"FNanchor_117" /><SPAN href="#Footnote_117" class=
"fnanchor">[117]</SPAN></p>
<p>As soon as I was settled in a lodging Mr. Charles had provided
for me, I went to visit Dr. Fothergill, to whom I was strongly
recommended, and whose counsel respecting my proceedings I was
advis'd to obtain. He was against an immediate complaint to
government, and thought the proprietaries should first be
personally appli'd to, who might possibly be induc'd by the
interposition and persuasion of some private friends, to
accommodate matters amicably. I then waited on my old friend and
correspondent, Mr. Peter Collinson, who told me that John Hanbury,
the great Virginia merchant, had requested to be informed when I
should arrive, that he might carry me to Lord Granville's,<SPAN name=
"FNanchor_118" id="FNanchor_118" /><SPAN href="#Footnote_118" class=
"fnanchor">[118]</SPAN> who was then President of the Council and
wished to see me as soon as possible. I agreed to go with him the
next morning. Accordingly Mr. Hanbury called for me and took me in
his carriage to that nobleman's, who receiv'd me with great
civility; and after some questions respecting the present state of
affairs in America and discourse thereupon, he said to me: "You
Americans have wrong ideas of the nature of your constitution; you
contend that the king's instructions to his governors are not laws,
and think yourselves at liberty to regard or disregard them at your
own discretion. But those instructions are not like the pocket
instructions given to a minister going abroad, for regulating his
conduct in some trifling point of ceremony. They are first drawn up
by judges learned in the laws; they are then considered, debated,
and perhaps amended in Council, after which they are signed by the
king. They are then, so far as they relate to you, the <i>law of
the land</i>, for the king is the <span class="smcap">Legislator of
the Colonies</span>,"<SPAN name="FNanchor_119" id="FNanchor_119" /><SPAN href="#Footnote_119" class="fnanchor">[119]</SPAN> I told his lordship
this was new doctrine to me. I had always understood from our
charters that our laws were to be made by our Assemblies, to be
presented indeed to the king for his royal assent, but that being
once given the king could not repeal or alter them. And as the
Assemblies could not make permanent laws without his assent, so
neither could he make a law for them without theirs. He assur'd me
I was totally mistaken. I did not think so, however, and his
lordship's conversation having a little alarm'd me as to what might
be the sentiments of the court concerning us, I wrote it down as
soon as I return'd to my lodgings. I recollected that about 20
years before, a clause in a bill brought into Parliament by the
ministry had propos'd to make the king's instructions laws in the
colonies, but the clause was thrown out by the Commons, for which
we adored them as our friends and friends of liberty, till by their
conduct towards us in 1765 it seem'd that they had refus'd that
point of sovereignty to the king only that they might reserve it
for themselves.</p>
<p>With his keen insight into human nature and his consequent
knowledge of American character, he foresaw the inevitable result
of such an attitude on the part of England. This conversation with
Grenville makes these last pages of the <i>Autobiography</i> one of
its most important parts.</p>
<p>After some days, Dr. Fothergill having spoken to the
proprietaries, they agreed to a meeting with me at Mr. T. Penn's
house in Spring Garden. The conversation at first consisted of
mutual declarations of disposition to reasonable accommodations,
but I suppose each party had its own ideas of what should be meant
by <i>reasonable</i>. We then went into consideration of our
several points of complaint, which I enumerated. The proprietaries
justify'd their conduct as well as they could, and I the
Assembly's. We now appeared very wide, and so far from each other
in our opinions as to discourage all hope of agreement. However, it
was concluded that I should give them the heads of our complaints
in writing, and they promis'd then to consider them. I did so soon
after, but they put the paper into the hands of their solicitor,
Ferdinand John Paris, who managed for them all their law business
in their great suit with the neighbouring proprietary of Maryland,
Lord Baltimore, which had subsisted 70 years, and wrote for them
all their papers and messages in their dispute with the Assembly.
He was a proud, angry man, and as I had occasionally in the answers
of the Assembly treated his papers with some severity, they being
really weak in point of argument and haughty in expression, he had
conceived a mortal enmity to me, which discovering itself whenever
we met, I declin'd the proprietary's proposal that he and I should
discuss the heads of complaint between our two selves, and refus'd
treating with anyone but them. They then by his advice put the
paper into the hands of the Attorney and Solicitor-General for
their opinion and counsel upon it, where it lay unanswered a year
wanting eight days, during which time I made frequent demands of an
answer from the proprietaries, but without obtaining any other than
that they had not yet received the opinion of the Attorney and
Solicitor-General. What it was when they did receive it I never
learnt, for they did not communicate it to me, but sent a long
message to the Assembly drawn and signed by Paris, reciting my
paper, complaining of its want of formality, as a rudeness on my
part, and giving a flimsy justification of their conduct, adding
that they should be willing to accommodate matters if the Assembly
would send out <i>some person of candour</i> to treat with them for
that purpose, intimating thereby that I was not such.</p>
<div class="figcenter"><SPAN name="p318" id="p318" /> <SPAN href= "images/illus-035-red.jpg"><ANTIMG src="images/illus-035thumb.jpg" alt= "We now appeared very wide, and so far from each other in our opinions as to discourage all hope of agreement"
title=
"We now appeared very wide, and so far from each other in our opinions as to discourage all hope of agreement" /></SPAN></div>
<div class="center_caption">"We now appeared very wide, and so far
from each other in our opinions as to discourage all hope of
agreement"</div>
<p>The want of formality or rudeness was, probably, my not having
address'd the paper to them with their assum'd titles of True and
Absolute Proprietaries of the Province of Pennsylvania, which I
omitted as not thinking it necessary in a paper, the intention of
which was only to reduce to a certainty by writing, what in
conversation I had delivered <i>viva voce</i>.</p>
<p>But during this delay, the Assembly having prevailed with Gov'r
Denny to pass an act taxing the proprietary estate in common with
the estates of the people, which was the grand point in dispute,
they omitted answering the message.</p>
<p>When this act however came over, the proprietaries, counselled
by Paris, determined to oppose its receiving the royal assent.
Accordingly they petitioned the king in Council, and a hearing was
appointed in which two lawyers were employ'd by them against the
act, and two by me in support of it. They alledg'd that the act was
intended to load the proprietary estate in order to spare those of
the people, and that if it were suffer'd to continue in force, and
the proprietaries, who were in odium with the people, left to their
mercy in proportioning the taxes, they would inevitably be ruined.
We reply'd that the act had no such intention, and would have no
such effect. That the assessors were honest and discreet men under
an oath to assess fairly and equitably, and that any advantage each
of them might expect in lessening his own tax by augmenting that of
the proprietaries was too trifling to induce them to perjure
themselves. This is the purport of what I remember as urged by both
sides, except that we insisted strongly on the mischievous
consequences that must attend a repeal, for that the money,
£100,000, being printed and given to the king's use, expended
in his service, and now spread among the people, the repeal would
strike it dead in their hands to the ruin of many, and the total
discouragement of future grants, and the selfishness of the
proprietors in soliciting such a general catastrophe, merely from a
groundless fear of their estate being taxed too highly, was
insisted on in the strongest terms. On this, Lord Mansfield, one of
the counsel, rose, and beckoning me took me into the clerk's
chamber, while the lawyers were pleading, and asked me if I was
really of opinion that no injury would be done the proprietary
estate in the execution of the act. I said certainly. "Then," says
he, "you can have little objection to enter into an engagement to
assure that point." I answer'd, "None at all." He then call'd in
Paris, and after some discourse, his lordship's proposition was
accepted on both sides; a paper to the purpose was drawn up by the
Clerk of the Council, which I sign'd with Mr. Charles, who was also
an Agent of the Province for their ordinary affairs, when Lord
Mansfield returned to the Council Chamber, where finally the law
was allowed to pass. Some changes were however recommended and we
also engaged they should be made by a subsequent law, but the
Assembly did not think them necessary; for one year's tax having
been levied by the act before the order of Council arrived, they
appointed a committee to examine the proceedings of the assessors,
and on this committee they put several particular friends of the
proprietaries. After a full enquiry, they unanimously sign'd a
report that they found the tax had been assess'd with perfect
equity.</p>
<p>The Assembly looked into my entering into the first part of the
engagement, as an essential service to the Province, since it
secured the credit of the paper money then spread over all the
country. They gave me their thanks in form when I return'd. But the
proprietaries were enraged at Governor Denny for having pass'd the
act, and turn'd him out with threats of suing him for breach of
instructions which he had given bond to observe. He, however,
having done it at the instance of the General, and for His
Majesty's service, and having some powerful interest at court,
despis'd the threats and they were never put in execution....
[unfinished]</p>
<div class="footnote">
<p><SPAN name="Footnote_111" id="Footnote_111" /><SPAN href=
"#FNanchor_111"><span class="label">[111]</span></SPAN> Quarrel
between George II and his son, Frederick, Prince of Wales, who died
before his father.</p>
</div>
<div class="footnote">
<p><SPAN name="Footnote_112" id="Footnote_112" /><SPAN href=
"#FNanchor_112"><span class="label">[112]</span></SPAN> A satirical
poem by Alexander Pope directed against various contemporary
writers.</p>
</div>
<div class="footnote">
<p><SPAN name="Footnote_113" id="Footnote_113" /><SPAN href=
"#FNanchor_113"><span class="label">[113]</span></SPAN> William Pitt,
first Earl of Chatham (1708-1778), a great English statesman and
orator. Under his able administration, England won Canada from
France. He was a friend of America at the time of our
Revolution.</p>
</div>
<div class="footnote">
<p><SPAN name="Footnote_114" id="Footnote_114" /><SPAN href=
"#FNanchor_114"><span class="label">[114]</span></SPAN> This relation
illustrates the corruption that characterized English public life
in the eighteenth century. (See page <SPAN href="#pg308">308</SPAN>). It
was gradually overcome in the early part of the next century.</p>
</div>
<div class="footnote">
<p><SPAN name="Footnote_115" id="Footnote_115" /><SPAN href=
"#FNanchor_115"><span class="label">[115]</span></SPAN> A piece of
wood shaped and weighted so as to keep it stable when in the water.
To this is attached a line knotted at regular distances. By these
devices it is possible to tell the speed of a ship.</p>
</div>
<div class="footnote">
<p><SPAN name="Footnote_116" id="Footnote_116" /><SPAN href=
"#FNanchor_116"><span class="label">[116]</span></SPAN> A celebrated
prehistoric ruin, probably of a temple built by the early Britons,
near Salisbury, England. It consists of inner and outer circles of
enormous stones, some of which are connected by stone slabs.</p>
</div>
<div class="footnote">
<p><SPAN name="Footnote_117" id="Footnote_117" /><SPAN href=
"#FNanchor_117"><span class="label">[117]</span></SPAN> "Here
terminates the <i>Autobiography</i>, as published by Wm. Temple
Franklin and his successors. What follows was written in the last
year of Dr. Franklin's life, and was never before printed in
English."—Mr. Bigelow's note in his edition of 1868.</p>
</div>
<div class="footnote">
<p><SPAN name="Footnote_118" id="Footnote_118" /><SPAN href=
"#FNanchor_118"><span class="label">[118]</span></SPAN> George
Granville or Grenville (1712-1770). As English premier from 1763 to
1765, he introduced the direct taxation of the American Colonies
and has sometimes been called the immediate cause of the
Revolution.</p>
</div>
<div class="footnote">
<p><SPAN name="Footnote_119" id="Footnote_119" /><SPAN href=
"#FNanchor_119"><span class="label">[119]</span></SPAN> This whole
passage shows how hopelessly divergent were the English and
American views on the relations between the mother country and her
colonies. Grenville here made clear that the Americans were to have
no voice in making or amending their laws. Parliament and the king
were to have absolute power over the colonies. No wonder Franklin
was alarmed by this new doctrine.</p>
</div>
<div class="figcenter"><ANTIMG width-obs="25%" src= "images/illus-036-red.jpg" alt= "Medal with inscription: BENJ. FRANLIN NATUS BOSTON XVII, JAN. MDCCVI." title=
"Medal with inscription: BENJ. FRANLIN NATUS BOSTON XVII, JAN. MDCCVI." /></div>
<hr style="width: 65%;" />
<h3>APPENDIX</h3>
<hr style="width: 65%;" />
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />