<h2>CHAPTER XXIX—ENGLAND UNDER EDWARD THE SIXTH</h2>
<p>Henry the Eighth had made a will, appointing a council of
sixteen to govern the kingdom for his son while he was under age
(he was now only ten years old), and another council of twelve to
help them. The most powerful of the first council was the
<span class="smcap">Earl of Hertford</span>, the young
King’s uncle, who lost no time in bringing his nephew with
great state up to Enfield, and thence to the Tower. It was
considered at the time a striking proof of virtue in the young
King that he was sorry for his father’s death; but, as
common subjects have that virtue too, sometimes, we will say no
more about it.</p>
<p>There was a curious part of the late King’s will,
requiring his executors to fulfil whatever promises he had
made. Some of the court wondering what these might be, the
Earl of Hertford and the other noblemen interested, said that
they were promises to advance and enrich <i>them</i>. So,
the Earl of Hertford made himself <span class="smcap">Duke of
Somerset</span>, and made his brother <span class="smcap">Edward
Seymour</span> a baron; and there were various similar
promotions, all very agreeable to the parties concerned, and very
dutiful, no doubt, to the late King’s memory. To be
more dutiful still, they made themselves rich out of the Church
lands, and were very comfortable. The new Duke of Somerset
caused himself to be declared <span class="smcap">Protector</span> of the kingdom, and was, indeed,
the King.</p>
<p>As young Edward the Sixth had been brought up in the
principles of the Protestant religion, everybody knew that they
would be maintained. But Cranmer, to whom they were chiefly
entrusted, advanced them steadily and temperately. Many
superstitious and ridiculous practices were stopped; but
practices which were harmless were not interfered with.</p>
<p>The Duke of Somerset, the Protector, was anxious to have the
young King engaged in marriage to the young Queen of Scotland, in
order to prevent that princess from making an alliance with any
foreign power; but, as a large party in Scotland were
unfavourable to this plan, he invaded that country. His
excuse for doing so was, that the Border men—that is, the
Scotch who lived in that part of the country where England and
Scotland joined—troubled the English very much. But
there were two sides to this question; for the English Border men
troubled the Scotch too; and, through many long years, there were
perpetual border quarrels which gave rise to numbers of old tales
and songs. However, the Protector invaded Scotland; and
<span class="smcap">Arran</span>, the Scottish Regent, with an
army twice as large as his, advanced to meet him. They
encountered on the banks of the river Esk, within a few miles of
Edinburgh; and there, after a little skirmish, the Protector made
such moderate proposals, in offering to retire if the Scotch
would only engage not to marry their princess to any foreign
prince, that the Regent thought the English were afraid.
But in this he made a horrible mistake; for the English soldiers
on land, and the English sailors on the water, so set upon the
Scotch, that they broke and fled, and more than ten thousand of
them were killed. It was a dreadful battle, for the
fugitives were slain without mercy. The ground for four
miles, all the way to Edinburgh, was strewn with dead men, and
with arms, and legs, and heads. Some hid themselves in
streams and were drowned; some threw away their armour and were
killed running, almost naked; but in this battle of Pinkey the
English lost only two or three hundred men. They were much
better clothed than the Scotch; at the poverty of whose
appearance and country they were exceedingly astonished.</p>
<p>A Parliament was called when Somerset came back, and it
repealed the whip with six strings, and did one or two other good
things; though it unhappily retained the punishment of burning
for those people who did not make believe to believe, in all
religious matters, what the Government had declared that they
must and should believe. It also made a foolish law (meant
to put down beggars), that any man who lived idly and loitered
about for three days together, should be burned with a hot iron,
made a slave, and wear an iron fetter. But this savage
absurdity soon came to an end, and went the way of a great many
other foolish laws.</p>
<p>The Protector was now so proud that he sat in Parliament
before all the nobles, on the right hand of the throne.
Many other noblemen, who only wanted to be as proud if they could
get a chance, became his enemies of course; and it is supposed
that he came back suddenly from Scotland because he had received
news that his brother, <span class="smcap">Lord Seymour</span>,
was becoming dangerous to him. This lord was now High
Admiral of England; a very handsome man, and a great favourite
with the Court ladies—even with the young Princess
Elizabeth, who romped with him a little more than young
princesses in these times do with any one. He had married
Catherine Parr, the late King’s widow, who was now dead;
and, to strengthen his power, he secretly supplied the young King
with money. He may even have engaged with some of his
brother’s enemies in a plot to carry the boy off. On
these and other accusations, at any rate, he was confined in the
Tower, impeached, and found guilty; his own brother’s name
being—unnatural and sad to tell—the first signed to
the warrant of his execution. He was executed on Tower
Hill, and died denying his treason. One of his last
proceedings in this world was to write two letters, one to the
Princess Elizabeth, and one to the Princess Mary, which a servant
of his took charge of, and concealed in his shoe. These
letters are supposed to have urged them against his brother, and
to revenge his death. What they truly contained is not
known; but there is no doubt that he had, at one time, obtained
great influence over the Princess Elizabeth.</p>
<p>All this while, the Protestant religion was making
progress. The images which the people had gradually come to
worship, were removed from the churches; the people were informed
that they need not confess themselves to priests unless they
chose; a common prayer-book was drawn up in the English language,
which all could understand, and many other improvements were
made; still moderately. For Cranmer was a very moderate
man, and even restrained the Protestant clergy from violently
abusing the unreformed religion—as they very often did, and
which was not a good example. But the people were at this
time in great distress. The rapacious nobility who had come
into possession of the Church lands, were very bad
landlords. They enclosed great quantities of ground for the
feeding of sheep, which was then more profitable than the growing
of crops; and this increased the general distress. So the
people, who still understood little of what was going on about
them, and still readily believed what the homeless monks told
them—many of whom had been their good friends in their
better days—took it into their heads that all this was
owing to the reformed religion, and therefore rose, in many parts
of the country.</p>
<p>The most powerful risings were in Devonshire and
Norfolk. In Devonshire, the rebellion was so strong that
ten thousand men united within a few days, and even laid siege to
Exeter. But <span class="smcap">Lord Russell</span>, coming
to the assistance of the citizens who defended that town,
defeated the rebels; and, not only hanged the Mayor of one place,
but hanged the vicar of another from his own church
steeple. What with hanging and killing by the sword, four
thousand of the rebels are supposed to have fallen in that one
county. In Norfolk (where the rising was more against the
enclosure of open lands than against the reformed religion), the
popular leader was a man named <span class="smcap">Robert
Ket</span>, a tanner of Wymondham. The mob were, in the
first instance, excited against the tanner by one <span class="smcap">John Flowerdew</span>, a gentleman who owed him a
grudge: but the tanner was more than a match for the gentleman,
since he soon got the people on his side, and established himself
near Norwich with quite an army. There was a large oak-tree
in that place, on a spot called Moushold Hill, which Ket named
the Tree of Reformation; and under its green boughs, he and his
men sat, in the midsummer weather, holding courts of justice, and
debating affairs of state. They were even impartial enough
to allow some rather tiresome public speakers to get up into this
Tree of Reformation, and point out their errors to them, in long
discourses, while they lay listening (not always without some
grumbling and growling) in the shade below. At last, one
sunny July day, a herald appeared below the tree, and proclaimed
Ket and all his men traitors, unless from that moment they
dispersed and went home: in which case they were to receive a
pardon. But, Ket and his men made light of the herald and
became stronger than ever, until the Earl of Warwick went after
them with a sufficient force, and cut them all to pieces. A
few were hanged, drawn, and quartered, as traitors, and their
limbs were sent into various country places to be a terror to the
people. Nine of them were hanged upon nine green branches
of the Oak of Reformation; and so, for the time, that tree may be
said to have withered away.</p>
<p>The Protector, though a haughty man, had compassion for the
real distresses of the common people, and a sincere desire to
help them. But he was too proud and too high in degree to
hold even their favour steadily; and many of the nobles always
envied and hated him, because they were as proud and not as high
as he. He was at this time building a great Palace in the
Strand: to get the stone for which he blew up church steeples
with gunpowder, and pulled down bishops’ houses: thus
making himself still more disliked. At length, his
principal enemy, the Earl of Warwick—Dudley by name, and
the son of that Dudley who had made himself so odious with
Empson, in the reign of Henry the Seventh—joined with seven
other members of the Council against him, formed a separate
Council; and, becoming stronger in a few days, sent him to the
Tower under twenty-nine articles of accusation. After being
sentenced by the Council to the forfeiture of all his offices and
lands, he was liberated and pardoned, on making a very humble
submission. He was even taken back into the Council again,
after having suffered this fall, and married his daughter, <span class="smcap">Lady Anne Seymour</span>, to Warwick’s eldest
son. But such a reconciliation was little likely to last,
and did not outlive a year. Warwick, having got himself
made Duke of Northumberland, and having advanced the more
important of his friends, then finished the history by causing
the Duke of Somerset and his friend <span class="smcap">Lord
Grey</span>, and others, to be arrested for treason, in having
conspired to seize and dethrone the King. They were also
accused of having intended to seize the new Duke of
Northumberland, with his friends <span class="smcap">Lord
Northampton</span> and <span class="smcap">Lord Pembroke</span>;
to murder them if they found need; and to raise the City to
revolt. All this the fallen Protector positively denied;
except that he confessed to having spoken of the murder of those
three noblemen, but having never designed it. He was
acquitted of the charge of treason, and found guilty of the other
charges; so when the people—who remembered his having been
their friend, now that he was disgraced and in danger, saw him
come out from his trial with the axe turned from him—they
thought he was altogether acquitted, and sent up a loud shout of
joy.</p>
<p>But the Duke of Somerset was ordered to be beheaded on Tower
Hill, at eight o’clock in the morning, and proclamations
were issued bidding the citizens keep at home until after
ten. They filled the streets, however, and crowded the
place of execution as soon as it was light; and, with sad faces
and sad hearts, saw the once powerful Protector ascend the
scaffold to lay his head upon the dreadful block. While he
was yet saying his last words to them with manly courage, and
telling them, in particular, how it comforted him, at that pass,
to have assisted in reforming the national religion, a member of
the Council was seen riding up on horseback. They again
thought that the Duke was saved by his bringing a reprieve, and
again shouted for joy. But the Duke himself told them they
were mistaken, and laid down his head and had it struck off at a
blow.</p>
<p>Many of the bystanders rushed forward and steeped their
handkerchiefs in his blood, as a mark of their affection.
He had, indeed, been capable of many good acts, and one of them
was discovered after he was no more. The Bishop of Durham,
a very good man, had been informed against to the Council, when
the Duke was in power, as having answered a treacherous letter
proposing a rebellion against the reformed religion. As the
answer could not be found, he could not be declared guilty; but
it was now discovered, hidden by the Duke himself among some
private papers, in his regard for that good man. The Bishop
lost his office, and was deprived of his possessions.</p>
<p>It is not very pleasant to know that while his uncle lay in
prison under sentence of death, the young King was being vastly
entertained by plays, and dances, and sham fights: but there is
no doubt of it, for he kept a journal himself. It is
pleasanter to know that not a single Roman Catholic was burnt in
this reign for holding that religion; though two wretched victims
suffered for heresy. One, a woman named <span class="smcap">Joan Bocher</span>, for professing some opinions
that even she could only explain in unintelligible jargon.
The other, a Dutchman, named <span class="smcap">Von
Paris</span>, who practised as a surgeon in London. Edward
was, to his credit, exceedingly unwilling to sign the warrant for
the woman’s execution: shedding tears before he did so, and
telling Cranmer, who urged him to do it (though Cranmer really
would have spared the woman at first, but for her own determined
obstinacy), that the guilt was not his, but that of the man who
so strongly urged the dreadful act. We shall see, too soon,
whether the time ever came when Cranmer is likely to have
remembered this with sorrow and remorse.</p>
<p>Cranmer and <span class="smcap">Ridley</span> (at first Bishop
of Rochester, and afterwards Bishop of London) were the most
powerful of the clergy of this reign. Others were
imprisoned and deprived of their property for still adhering to
the unreformed religion; the most important among whom were <span class="smcap">Gardiner</span> Bishop of Winchester, <span class="smcap">Heath</span> Bishop of Worcester, <span class="smcap">Day</span> Bishop of Chichester, and <span class="smcap">Bonner</span> that Bishop of London who was
superseded by Ridley. The Princess Mary, who inherited her
mother’s gloomy temper, and hated the reformed religion as
connected with her mother’s wrongs and sorrows—she
knew nothing else about it, always refusing to read a single book
in which it was truly described—held by the unreformed
religion too, and was the only person in the kingdom for whom the
old Mass was allowed to be performed; nor would the young King
have made that exception even in her favour, but for the strong
persuasions of Cranmer and Ridley. He always viewed it with
horror; and when he fell into a sickly condition, after having
been very ill, first of the measles and then of the small-pox, he
was greatly troubled in mind to think that if he died, and she,
the next heir to the throne, succeeded, the Roman Catholic
religion would be set up again.</p>
<p>This uneasiness, the Duke of Northumberland was not slow to
encourage: for, if the Princess Mary came to the throne, he, who
had taken part with the Protestants, was sure to be
disgraced. Now, the Duchess of Suffolk was descended from
King Henry the Seventh; and, if she resigned what little or no
right she had, in favour of her daughter <span class="smcap">Lady
Jane Grey</span>, that would be the succession to promote the
Duke’s greatness; because <span class="smcap">Lord Guilford
Dudley</span>, one of his sons, was, at this very time, newly
married to her. So, he worked upon the King’s fears,
and persuaded him to set aside both the Princess Mary and the
Princess Elizabeth, and assert his right to appoint his
successor. Accordingly the young King handed to the Crown
lawyers a writing signed half a dozen times over by himself,
appointing Lady Jane Grey to succeed to the Crown, and requiring
them to have his will made out according to law. They were
much against it at first, and told the King so; but the Duke of
Northumberland—being so violent about it that the lawyers
even expected him to beat them, and hotly declaring that,
stripped to his shirt, he would fight any man in such a
quarrel—they yielded. Cranmer, also, at first
hesitated; pleading that he had sworn to maintain the succession
of the Crown to the Princess Mary; but, he was a weak man in his
resolutions, and afterwards signed the document with the rest of
the council.</p>
<p>It was completed none too soon; for Edward was now sinking in
a rapid decline; and, by way of making him better, they handed
him over to a woman-doctor who pretended to be able to cure
it. He speedily got worse. On the sixth of July, in
the year one thousand five hundred and fifty-three, he died, very
peaceably and piously, praying God, with his last breath, to
protect the reformed religion.</p>
<p>This King died in the sixteenth year of his age, and in the
seventh of his reign. It is difficult to judge what the
character of one so young might afterwards have become among so
many bad, ambitious, quarrelling nobles. But, he was an
amiable boy, of very good abilities, and had nothing coarse or
cruel or brutal in his disposition—which in the son of such
a father is rather surprising.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />