<h2>CHAPTER XII—ENGLAND UNDER HENRY THE SECOND</h2>
<h3>PART THE FIRST</h3>
<p>Henry Plantagenet, when he was but twenty-one years old,
quietly succeeded to the throne of England, according to his
agreement made with the late King at Winchester. Six weeks
after Stephen’s death, he and his Queen, Eleanor, were
crowned in that city; into which they rode on horseback in great
state, side by side, amidst much shouting and rejoicing, and
clashing of music, and strewing of flowers.</p>
<p>The reign of King Henry the Second began well. The King
had great possessions, and (what with his own rights, and what
with those of his wife) was lord of one-third part of
France. He was a young man of vigour, ability, and
resolution, and immediately applied himself to remove some of the
evils which had arisen in the last unhappy reign. He
revoked all the grants of land that had been hastily made, on
either side, during the late struggles; he obliged numbers of
disorderly soldiers to depart from England; he reclaimed all the
castles belonging to the Crown; and he forced the wicked nobles
to pull down their own castles, to the number of eleven hundred,
in which such dismal cruelties had been inflicted on the
people. The King’s brother, <span class="smcap">Geoffrey</span>, rose against him in France, while
he was so well employed, and rendered it necessary for him to
repair to that country; where, after he had subdued and made a
friendly arrangement with his brother (who did not live long),
his ambition to increase his possessions involved him in a war
with the French King, Louis, with whom he had been on such
friendly terms just before, that to the French King’s
infant daughter, then a baby in the cradle, he had promised one
of his little sons in marriage, who was a child of five years
old. However, the war came to nothing at last, and the Pope
made the two Kings friends again.</p>
<p>Now, the clergy, in the troubles of the last reign, had gone
on very ill indeed. There were all kinds of criminals among
them—murderers, thieves, and vagabonds; and the worst of
the matter was, that the good priests would not give up the bad
priests to justice, when they committed crimes, but persisted in
sheltering and defending them. The King, well knowing that
there could be no peace or rest in England while such things
lasted, resolved to reduce the power of the clergy; and, when he
had reigned seven years, found (as he considered) a good
opportunity for doing so, in the death of the Archbishop of
Canterbury. ‘I will have for the new
Archbishop,’ thought the King, ‘a friend in whom I
can trust, who will help me to humble these rebellious priests,
and to have them dealt with, when they do wrong, as other men who
do wrong are dealt with.’ So, he resolved to make his
favourite, the new Archbishop; and this favourite was so
extraordinary a man, and his story is so curious, that I must
tell you all about him.</p>
<p>Once upon a time, a worthy merchant of London, named <span class="smcap">Gilbert à Becket</span>, made a pilgrimage
to the Holy Land, and was taken prisoner by a Saracen lord.
This lord, who treated him kindly and not like a slave, had one
fair daughter, who fell in love with the merchant; and who told
him that she wanted to become a Christian, and was willing to
marry him if they could fly to a Christian country. The
merchant returned her love, until he found an opportunity to
escape, when he did not trouble himself about the Saracen lady,
but escaped with his servant Richard, who had been taken prisoner
along with him, and arrived in England and forgot her. The
Saracen lady, who was more loving than the merchant, left her
father’s house in disguise to follow him, and made her way,
under many hardships, to the sea-shore. The merchant had
taught her only two English words (for I suppose he must have
learnt the Saracen tongue himself, and made love in that
language), of which <span class="smcap">London</span> was one,
and his own name, <span class="smcap">Gilbert</span>, the
other. She went among the ships, saying, ‘London!
London!’ over and over again, until the sailors understood
that she wanted to find an English vessel that would carry her
there; so they showed her such a ship, and she paid for her
passage with some of her jewels, and sailed away.
Well! The merchant was sitting in his counting-house in
London one day, when he heard a great noise in the street; and
presently Richard came running in from the warehouse, with his
eyes wide open and his breath almost gone, saying, ‘Master,
master, here is the Saracen lady!’ The merchant
thought Richard was mad; but Richard said, ‘No,
master! As I live, the Saracen lady is going up and down
the city, calling Gilbert! Gilbert!’ Then, he
took the merchant by the sleeve, and pointed out of window; and
there they saw her among the gables and water-spouts of the dark,
dirty street, in her foreign dress, so forlorn, surrounded by a
wondering crowd, and passing slowly along, calling Gilbert,
Gilbert! When the merchant saw her, and thought of the
tenderness she had shown him in his captivity, and of her
constancy, his heart was moved, and he ran down into the street;
and she saw him coming, and with a great cry fainted in his
arms. They were married without loss of time, and Richard
(who was an excellent man) danced with joy the whole day of the
wedding; and they all lived happy ever afterwards.</p>
<p>This merchant and this Saracen lady had one son, <span class="smcap">Thomas à Becket</span>. He it was who
became the Favourite of King Henry the Second.</p>
<p>He had become Chancellor, when the King thought of making him
Archbishop. He was clever, gay, well educated, brave; had
fought in several battles in France; had defeated a French knight
in single combat, and brought his horse away as a token of the
victory. He lived in a noble palace, he was the tutor of
the young Prince Henry, he was served by one hundred and forty
knights, his riches were immense. The King once sent him as
his ambassador to France; and the French people, beholding in
what state he travelled, cried out in the streets, ‘How
splendid must the King of England be, when this is only the
Chancellor!’ They had good reason to wonder at the
magnificence of Thomas à Becket, for, when he entered a
French town, his procession was headed by two hundred and fifty
singing boys; then, came his hounds in couples; then, eight
waggons, each drawn by five horses driven by five drivers: two of
the waggons filled with strong ale to be given away to the
people; four, with his gold and silver plate and stately clothes;
two, with the dresses of his numerous servants. Then, came
twelve horses, each with a monkey on his back; then, a train of
people bearing shields and leading fine war-horses splendidly
equipped; then, falconers with hawks upon their wrists; then, a
host of knights, and gentlemen and priests; then, the Chancellor
with his brilliant garments flashing in the sun, and all the
people capering and shouting with delight.</p>
<p>The King was well pleased with all this, thinking that it only
made himself the more magnificent to have so magnificent a
favourite; but he sometimes jested with the Chancellor upon his
splendour too. Once, when they were riding together through
the streets of London in hard winter weather, they saw a
shivering old man in rags. ‘Look at the poor
object!’ said the King. ‘Would it not be a
charitable act to give that aged man a comfortable warm
cloak?’ ‘Undoubtedly it would,’ said
Thomas à Becket, ‘and you do well, Sir, to think of
such Christian duties.’ ‘Come!’ cried the
King, ‘then give him your cloak!’ It was made
of rich crimson trimmed with ermine. The King tried to pull
it off, the Chancellor tried to keep it on, both were near
rolling from their saddles in the mud, when the Chancellor
submitted, and the King gave the cloak to the old beggar: much to
the beggar’s astonishment, and much to the merriment of all
the courtiers in attendance. For, courtiers are not only
eager to laugh when the King laughs, but they really do enjoy a
laugh against a Favourite.</p>
<p>‘I will make,’ thought King Henry the second,
‘this Chancellor of mine, Thomas à Becket,
Archbishop of Canterbury. He will then be the head of the
Church, and, being devoted to me, will help me to correct the
Church. He has always upheld my power against the power of
the clergy, and once publicly told some bishops (I remember),
that men of the Church were equally bound to me, with men of the
sword. Thomas à Becket is the man, of all other men
in England, to help me in my great design.’ So the
King, regardless of all objection, either that he was a fighting
man, or a lavish man, or a courtly man, or a man of pleasure, or
anything but a likely man for the office, made him Archbishop
accordingly.</p>
<p>Now, Thomas à Becket was proud and loved to be
famous. He was already famous for the pomp of his life, for
his riches, his gold and silver plate, his waggons, horses, and
attendants. He could do no more in that way than he had
done; and being tired of that kind of fame (which is a very poor
one), he longed to have his name celebrated for something
else. Nothing, he knew, would render him so famous in the
world, as the setting of his utmost power and ability against the
utmost power and ability of the King. He resolved with the
whole strength of his mind to do it.</p>
<p>He may have had some secret grudge against the King
besides. The King may have offended his proud humour at
some time or other, for anything I know. I think it likely,
because it is a common thing for Kings, Princes, and other great
people, to try the tempers of their favourites rather
severely. Even the little affair of the crimson cloak must
have been anything but a pleasant one to a haughty man.
Thomas à Becket knew better than any one in England what
the King expected of him. In all his sumptuous life, he had
never yet been in a position to disappoint the King. He
could take up that proud stand now, as head of the Church; and he
determined that it should be written in history, either that he
subdued the King, or that the King subdued him.</p>
<p>So, of a sudden, he completely altered the whole manner of his
life. He turned off all his brilliant followers, ate coarse
food, drank bitter water, wore next his skin sackcloth covered
with dirt and vermin (for it was then thought very religious to
be very dirty), flogged his back to punish himself, lived chiefly
in a little cell, washed the feet of thirteen poor people every
day, and looked as miserable as he possibly could. If he
had put twelve hundred monkeys on horseback instead of twelve,
and had gone in procession with eight thousand waggons instead of
eight, he could not have half astonished the people so much as by
this great change. It soon caused him to be more talked
about as an Archbishop than he had been as a Chancellor.</p>
<p>The King was very angry; and was made still more so, when the
new Archbishop, claiming various estates from the nobles as being
rightfully Church property, required the King himself, for the
same reason, to give up Rochester Castle, and Rochester City
too. Not satisfied with this, he declared that no power but
himself should appoint a priest to any Church in the part of
England over which he was Archbishop; and when a certain
gentleman of Kent made such an appointment, as he claimed to have
the right to do, Thomas à Becket excommunicated him.</p>
<p>Excommunication was, next to the Interdict I told you of at
the close of the last chapter, the great weapon of the
clergy. It consisted in declaring the person who was
excommunicated, an outcast from the Church and from all religious
offices; and in cursing him all over, from the top of his head to
the sole of his foot, whether he was standing up, lying down,
sitting, kneeling, walking, running, hopping, jumping, gaping,
coughing, sneezing, or whatever else he was doing. This
unchristian nonsense would of course have made no sort of
difference to the person cursed—who could say his prayers
at home if he were shut out of church, and whom none but <span class="smcap">God</span> could judge—but for the fears and
superstitions of the people, who avoided excommunicated persons,
and made their lives unhappy. So, the King said to the New
Archbishop, ‘Take off this Excommunication from this
gentleman of Kent.’ To which the Archbishop replied,
‘I shall do no such thing.’</p>
<p>The quarrel went on. A priest in Worcestershire
committed a most dreadful murder, that aroused the horror of the
whole nation. The King demanded to have this wretch
delivered up, to be tried in the same court and in the same way
as any other murderer. The Archbishop refused, and kept him
in the Bishop’s prison. The King, holding a solemn
assembly in Westminster Hall, demanded that in future all priests
found guilty before their Bishops of crimes against the law of
the land should be considered priests no longer, and should be
delivered over to the law of the land for punishment. The
Archbishop again refused. The King required to know whether
the clergy would obey the ancient customs of the country?
Every priest there, but one, said, after Thomas à Becket,
‘Saving my order.’ This really meant that they
would only obey those customs when they did not interfere with
their own claims; and the King went out of the Hall in great
wrath.</p>
<p>Some of the clergy began to be afraid, now, that they were
going too far. Though Thomas à Becket was otherwise
as unmoved as Westminster Hall, they prevailed upon him, for the
sake of their fears, to go to the King at Woodstock, and promise
to observe the ancient customs of the country, without saying
anything about his order. The King received this submission
favourably, and summoned a great council of the clergy to meet at
the Castle of Clarendon, by Salisbury. But when the council
met, the Archbishop again insisted on the words ‘saying my
order;’ and he still insisted, though lords entreated him,
and priests wept before him and knelt to him, and an adjoining
room was thrown open, filled with armed soldiers of the King, to
threaten him. At length he gave way, for that time, and the
ancient customs (which included what the King had demanded in
vain) were stated in writing, and were signed and sealed by the
chief of the clergy, and were called the Constitutions of
Clarendon.</p>
<p>The quarrel went on, for all that. The Archbishop tried
to see the King. The King would not see him. The
Archbishop tried to escape from England. The sailors on the
coast would launch no boat to take him away. Then, he again
resolved to do his worst in opposition to the King, and began
openly to set the ancient customs at defiance.</p>
<p>The King summoned him before a great council at Northampton,
where he accused him of high treason, and made a claim against
him, which was not a just one, for an enormous sum of
money. Thomas à Becket was alone against the whole
assembly, and the very Bishops advised him to resign his office
and abandon his contest with the King. His great anxiety
and agitation stretched him on a sick-bed for two days, but he
was still undaunted. He went to the adjourned council,
carrying a great cross in his right hand, and sat down holding it
erect before him. The King angrily retired into an inner
room. The whole assembly angrily retired and left him
there. But there he sat. The Bishops came out again
in a body, and renounced him as a traitor. He only said,
‘I hear!’ and sat there still. They retired
again into the inner room, and his trial proceeded without
him. By-and-by, the Earl of Leicester, heading the barons,
came out to read his sentence. He refused to hear it,
denied the power of the court, and said he would refer his cause
to the Pope. As he walked out of the hall, with the cross
in his hand, some of those present picked up rushes—rushes
were strewn upon the floors in those days by way of
carpet—and threw them at him. He proudly turned his
head, and said that were he not Archbishop, he would chastise
those cowards with the sword he had known how to use in bygone
days. He then mounted his horse, and rode away, cheered and
surrounded by the common people, to whom he threw open his house
that night and gave a supper, supping with them himself.
That same night he secretly departed from the town; and so,
travelling by night and hiding by day, and calling himself
‘Brother Dearman,’ got away, not without difficulty,
to Flanders.</p>
<p>The struggle still went on. The angry King took
possession of the revenues of the archbishopric, and banished all
the relations and servants of Thomas à Becket, to the
number of four hundred. The Pope and the French King both
protected him, and an abbey was assigned for his residence.
Stimulated by this support, Thomas à Becket, on a great
festival day, formally proceeded to a great church crowded with
people, and going up into the pulpit publicly cursed and
excommunicated all who had supported the Constitutions of
Clarendon: mentioning many English noblemen by name, and not
distantly hinting at the King of England himself.</p>
<p>When intelligence of this new affront was carried to the King
in his chamber, his passion was so furious that he tore his
clothes, and rolled like a madman on his bed of straw and
rushes. But he was soon up and doing. He ordered all
the ports and coasts of England to be narrowly watched, that no
letters of Interdict might be brought into the kingdom; and sent
messengers and bribes to the Pope’s palace at Rome.
Meanwhile, Thomas à Becket, for his part, was not idle at
Rome, but constantly employed his utmost arts in his own
behalf. Thus the contest stood, until there was peace
between France and England (which had been for some time at war),
and until the two children of the two Kings were married in
celebration of it. Then, the French King brought about a
meeting between Henry and his old favourite, so long his
enemy.</p>
<p>Even then, though Thomas à Becket knelt before the
King, he was obstinate and immovable as to those words about his
order. King Louis of France was weak enough in his
veneration for Thomas à Becket and such men, but this was
a little too much for him. He said that à Becket
‘wanted to be greater than the saints and better than St.
Peter,’ and rode away from him with the King of
England. His poor French Majesty asked à
Becket’s pardon for so doing, however, soon afterwards, and
cut a very pitiful figure.</p>
<p>At last, and after a world of trouble, it came to this.
There was another meeting on French ground between King Henry and
Thomas à Becket, and it was agreed that Thomas à
Becket should be Archbishop of Canterbury, according to the
customs of former Archbishops, and that the King should put him
in possession of the revenues of that post. And now,
indeed, you might suppose the struggle at an end, and Thomas
à Becket at rest. <span class="smcap">No</span>, not
even yet. For Thomas à Becket hearing, by some
means, that King Henry, when he was in dread of his kingdom being
placed under an interdict, had had his eldest son Prince Henry
secretly crowned, not only persuaded the Pope to suspend the
Archbishop of York who had performed that ceremony, and to
excommunicate the Bishops who had assisted at it, but sent a
messenger of his own into England, in spite of all the
King’s precautions along the coast, who delivered the
letters of excommunication into the Bishops’ own
hands. Thomas à Becket then came over to England
himself, after an absence of seven years. He was privately
warned that it was dangerous to come, and that an ireful knight,
named <span class="smcap">Ranulf de Broc</span>, had threatened
that he should not live to eat a loaf of bread in England; but he
came.</p>
<p>The common people received him well, and marched about with
him in a soldierly way, armed with such rustic weapons as they
could get. He tried to see the young prince who had once
been his pupil, but was prevented. He hoped for some little
support among the nobles and priests, but found none. He
made the most of the peasants who attended him, and feasted them,
and went from Canterbury to Harrow-on-the-Hill, and from
Harrow-on-the-Hill back to Canterbury, and on Christmas Day
preached in the Cathedral there, and told the people in his
sermon that he had come to die among them, and that it was likely
he would be murdered. He had no fear, however—or, if
he had any, he had much more obstinacy—for he, then and
there, excommunicated three of his enemies, of whom Ranulf de
Broc, the ireful knight, was one.</p>
<p>As men in general had no fancy for being cursed, in their
sitting and walking, and gaping and sneezing, and all the rest of
it, it was very natural in the persons so freely excommunicated
to complain to the King. It was equally natural in the
King, who had hoped that this troublesome opponent was at last
quieted, to fall into a mighty rage when he heard of these new
affronts; and, on the Archbishop of York telling him that he
never could hope for rest while Thomas à Becket lived, to
cry out hastily before his court, ‘Have I no one here who
will deliver me from this man?’ There were four
knights present, who, hearing the King’s words, looked at
one another, and went out.</p>
<p>The names of these knights were <span class="smcap">Reginald
Fitzurse</span>, <span class="smcap">William Tracy</span>, <span class="smcap">Hugh de Morville</span>, and <span class="smcap">Richard Brito</span>; three of whom had been in the
train of Thomas à Becket in the old days of his
splendour. They rode away on horseback, in a very secret
manner, and on the third day after Christmas Day arrived at
Saltwood House, not far from Canterbury, which belonged to the
family of Ranulf de Broc. They quietly collected some
followers here, in case they should need any; and proceeding to
Canterbury, suddenly appeared (the four knights and twelve men)
before the Archbishop, in his own house, at two o’clock in
the afternoon. They neither bowed nor spoke, but sat down
on the floor in silence, staring at the Archbishop.</p>
<p>Thomas à Becket said, at length, ‘What do you
want?’</p>
<p>‘We want,’ said Reginald Fitzurse, ‘the
excommunication taken from the Bishops, and you to answer for
your offences to the King.’ Thomas à Becket
defiantly replied, that the power of the clergy was above the
power of the King. That it was not for such men as they
were, to threaten him. That if he were threatened by all
the swords in England, he would never yield.</p>
<p>‘Then we will do more than threaten!’ said the
knights. And they went out with the twelve men, and put on
their armour, and drew their shining swords, and came back.</p>
<p>His servants, in the meantime, had shut up and barred the
great gate of the palace. At first, the knights tried to
shatter it with their battle-axes; but, being shown a window by
which they could enter, they let the gate alone, and climbed in
that way. While they were battering at the door, the
attendants of Thomas à Becket had implored him to take
refuge in the Cathedral; in which, as a sanctuary or sacred
place, they thought the knights would dare to do no violent
deed. He told them, again and again, that he would not
stir. Hearing the distant voices of the monks singing the
evening service, however, he said it was now his duty to attend,
and therefore, and for no other reason, he would go.</p>
<p>There was a near way between his Palace and the Cathedral, by
some beautiful old cloisters which you may yet see. He went
into the Cathedral, without any hurry, and having the Cross
carried before him as usual. When he was safely there, his
servants would have fastened the door, but he said <span class="smcap">No</span>! it was the house of God and not a
fortress.</p>
<p>As he spoke, the shadow of Reginald Fitzurse appeared in the
Cathedral doorway, darkening the little light there was outside,
on the dark winter evening. This knight said, in a strong
voice, ‘Follow me, loyal servants of the King!’
The rattle of the armour of the other knights echoed through the
Cathedral, as they came clashing in.</p>
<p>It was so dark, in the lofty aisles and among the stately
pillars of the church, and there were so many hiding-places in
the crypt below and in the narrow passages above, that Thomas
à Becket might even at that pass have saved himself if he
would. But he would not. He told the monks resolutely
that he would not. And though they all dispersed and left
him there with no other follower than <span class="smcap">Edward
Gryme</span>, his faithful cross-bearer, he was as firm then, as
ever he had been in his life.</p>
<p>The knights came on, through the darkness, making a terrible
noise with their armed tread upon the stone pavement of the
church. ‘Where is the traitor?’ they cried
out. He made no answer. But when they cried,
‘Where is the Archbishop?’ he said proudly, ‘I
am here!’ and came out of the shade and stood before
them.</p>
<p>The knights had no desire to kill him, if they could rid the
King and themselves of him by any other means. They told
him he must either fly or go with them. He said he would do
neither; and he threw William Tracy off with such force when he
took hold of his sleeve, that Tracy reeled again. By his
reproaches and his steadiness, he so incensed them, and
exasperated their fierce humour, that Reginald Fitzurse, whom he
called by an ill name, said, ‘Then die!’ and struck
at his head. But the faithful Edward Gryme put out his arm,
and there received the main force of the blow, so that it only
made his master bleed. Another voice from among the knights
again called to Thomas à Becket to fly; but, with his
blood running down his face, and his hands clasped, and his head
bent, he commanded himself to God, and stood firm. Then
they cruelly killed him close to the altar of St. Bennet; and his
body fell upon the pavement, which was dirtied with his blood and
brains.</p>
<p>It is an awful thing to think of the murdered mortal, who had
so showered his curses about, lying, all disfigured, in the
church, where a few lamps here and there were but red specks on a
pall of darkness; and to think of the guilty knights riding away
on horseback, looking over their shoulders at the dim Cathedral,
and remembering what they had left inside.</p>
<h3>PART THE SECOND</h3>
<p>When the King heard how Thomas à Becket had lost his
life in Canterbury Cathedral, through the ferocity of the four
Knights, he was filled with dismay. Some have supposed that
when the King spoke those hasty words, ‘Have I no one here
who will deliver me from this man?’ he wished, and meant
à Becket to be slain. But few things are more
unlikely; for, besides that the King was not naturally cruel
(though very passionate), he was wise, and must have known full
well what any stupid man in his dominions must have known,
namely, that such a murder would rouse the Pope and the whole
Church against him.</p>
<p>He sent respectful messengers to the Pope, to represent his
innocence (except in having uttered the hasty words); and he
swore solemnly and publicly to his innocence, and contrived in
time to make his peace. As to the four guilty Knights, who
fled into Yorkshire, and never again dared to show themselves at
Court, the Pope excommunicated them; and they lived miserably for
some time, shunned by all their countrymen. At last, they
went humbly to Jerusalem as a penance, and there died and were
buried.</p>
<p>It happened, fortunately for the pacifying of the Pope, that
an opportunity arose very soon after the murder of à
Becket, for the King to declare his power in Ireland—which
was an acceptable undertaking to the Pope, as the Irish, who had
been converted to Christianity by one Patricius (otherwise Saint
Patrick) long ago, before any Pope existed, considered that the
Pope had nothing at all to do with them, or they with the Pope,
and accordingly refused to pay him Peter’s Pence, or that
tax of a penny a house which I have elsewhere mentioned.
The King’s opportunity arose in this way.</p>
<p>The Irish were, at that time, as barbarous a people as you can
well imagine. They were continually quarrelling and
fighting, cutting one another’s throats, slicing one
another’s noses, burning one another’s houses,
carrying away one another’s wives, and committing all sorts
of violence. The country was divided into five
kingdoms—<span class="smcap">Desmond, Thomond</span>, <span class="smcap">Connaught</span>, <span class="smcap">Ulster</span>, and <span class="smcap">Leinster</span>—each governed by a separate
King, of whom one claimed to be the chief of the rest. Now,
one of these Kings, named <span class="smcap">Dermond Mac
Murrough</span> (a wild kind of name, spelt in more than one wild
kind of way), had carried off the wife of a friend of his, and
concealed her on an island in a bog. The friend resenting
this (though it was quite the custom of the country), complained
to the chief King, and, with the chief King’s help, drove
Dermond Mac Murrough out of his dominions. Dermond came
over to England for revenge; and offered to hold his realm as a
vassal of King Henry, if King Henry would help him to regain
it. The King consented to these terms; but only assisted
him, then, with what were called Letters Patent, authorising any
English subjects who were so disposed, to enter into his service,
and aid his cause.</p>
<p>There was, at Bristol, a certain <span class="smcap">Earl
Richard de Clare</span>, called <span class="smcap">Strongbow</span>; of no very good character; needy
and desperate, and ready for anything that offered him a chance
of improving his fortunes. There were, in South Wales, two
other broken knights of the same good-for-nothing sort, called
<span class="smcap">Robert Fitz-Stephen</span>, and <span class="smcap">Maurice Fitz-Gerald</span>. These three, each
with a small band of followers, took up Dermond’s cause;
and it was agreed that if it proved successful, Strongbow should
marry Dermond’s daughter <span class="smcap">Eva</span>,
and be declared his heir.</p>
<p>The trained English followers of these knights were so
superior in all the discipline of battle to the Irish, that they
beat them against immense superiority of numbers. In one
fight, early in the war, they cut off three hundred heads, and
laid them before Mac Murrough; who turned them every one up with
his hands, rejoicing, and, coming to one which was the head of a
man whom he had much disliked, grasped it by the hair and ears,
and tore off the nose and lips with his teeth. You may
judge from this, what kind of a gentleman an Irish King in those
times was. The captives, all through this war, were
horribly treated; the victorious party making nothing of breaking
their limbs, and casting them into the sea from the tops of high
rocks. It was in the midst of the miseries and cruelties
attendant on the taking of Waterford, where the dead lay piled in
the streets, and the filthy gutters ran with blood, that
Strongbow married Eva. An odious marriage-company those
mounds of corpse’s must have made, I think, and one quite
worthy of the young lady’s father.</p>
<p>He died, after Waterford and Dublin had been taken, and
various successes achieved; and Strongbow became King of
Leinster. Now came King Henry’s opportunity. To
restrain the growing power of Strongbow, he himself repaired to
Dublin, as Strongbow’s Royal Master, and deprived him of
his kingdom, but confirmed him in the enjoyment of great
possessions. The King, then, holding state in Dublin,
received the homage of nearly all the Irish Kings and Chiefs, and
so came home again with a great addition to his reputation as
Lord of Ireland, and with a new claim on the favour of the
Pope. And now, their reconciliation was
completed—more easily and mildly by the Pope, than the King
might have expected, I think.</p>
<p>At this period of his reign, when his troubles seemed so few
and his prospects so bright, those domestic miseries began which
gradually made the King the most unhappy of men, reduced his
great spirit, wore away his health, and broke his heart.</p>
<p>He had four sons. <span class="smcap">Henry</span>, now
aged eighteen—his secret crowning of whom had given such
offence to Thomas à Becket. <span class="smcap">Richard</span>, aged sixteen; <span class="smcap">Geoffrey</span>, fifteen; and <span class="smcap">John</span>, his favourite, a young boy whom the
courtiers named <span class="smcap">Lackland</span>, because he
had no inheritance, but to whom the King meant to give the
Lordship of Ireland. All these misguided boys, in their
turn, were unnatural sons to him, and unnatural brothers to each
other. Prince Henry, stimulated by the French King, and by
his bad mother, Queen Eleanor, began the undutiful history,</p>
<p>First, he demanded that his young wife, <span class="smcap">Margaret</span>, the French King’s daughter,
should be crowned as well as he. His father, the King,
consented, and it was done. It was no sooner done, than he
demanded to have a part of his father’s dominions, during
his father’s life. This being refused, he made off
from his father in the night, with his bad heart full of
bitterness, and took refuge at the French King’s
Court. Within a day or two, his brothers Richard and
Geoffrey followed. Their mother tried to join
them—escaping in man’s clothes—but she was
seized by King Henry’s men, and immured in prison, where
she lay, deservedly, for sixteen years. Every day, however,
some grasping English noblemen, to whom the King’s
protection of his people from their avarice and oppression had
given offence, deserted him and joined the Princes. Every
day he heard some fresh intelligence of the Princes levying
armies against him; of Prince Henry’s wearing a crown
before his own ambassadors at the French Court, and being called
the Junior King of England; of all the Princes swearing never to
make peace with him, their father, without the consent and
approval of the Barons of France. But, with his fortitude
and energy unshaken, King Henry met the shock of these disasters
with a resolved and cheerful face. He called upon all Royal
fathers who had sons, to help him, for his cause was theirs; he
hired, out of his riches, twenty thousand men to fight the false
French King, who stirred his own blood against him; and he
carried on the war with such vigour, that Louis soon proposed a
conference to treat for peace.</p>
<p>The conference was held beneath an old wide-spreading green
elm-tree, upon a plain in France. It led to nothing.
The war recommenced. Prince Richard began his fighting
career, by leading an army against his father; but his father
beat him and his army back; and thousands of his men would have
rued the day in which they fought in such a wicked cause, had not
the King received news of an invasion of England by the Scots,
and promptly come home through a great storm to repress it.
And whether he really began to fear that he suffered these
troubles because à Becket had been murdered; or whether he
wished to rise in the favour of the Pope, who had now declared
à Becket to be a saint, or in the favour of his own
people, of whom many believed that even à Becket’s
senseless tomb could work miracles, I don’t know: but the
King no sooner landed in England than he went straight to
Canterbury; and when he came within sight of the distant
Cathedral, he dismounted from his horse, took off his shoes, and
walked with bare and bleeding feet to à Becket’s
grave. There, he lay down on the ground, lamenting, in the
presence of many people; and by-and-by he went into the Chapter
House, and, removing his clothes from his back and shoulders,
submitted himself to be beaten with knotted cords (not beaten
very hard, I dare say though) by eighty Priests, one after
another. It chanced that on the very day when the King made
this curious exhibition of himself, a complete victory was
obtained over the Scots; which very much delighted the Priests,
who said that it was won because of his great example of
repentance. For the Priests in general had found out, since
à Becket’s death, that they admired him of all
things—though they had hated him very cordially when he was
alive.</p>
<p>The Earl of Flanders, who was at the head of the base
conspiracy of the King’s undutiful sons and their foreign
friends, took the opportunity of the King being thus employed at
home, to lay siege to Rouen, the capital of Normandy. But
the King, who was extraordinarily quick and active in all his
movements, was at Rouen, too, before it was supposed possible
that he could have left England; and there he so defeated the
said Earl of Flanders, that the conspirators proposed peace, and
his bad sons Henry and Geoffrey submitted. Richard resisted
for six weeks; but, being beaten out of castle after castle, he
at last submitted too, and his father forgave him.</p>
<p>To forgive these unworthy princes was only to afford them
breathing-time for new faithlessness. They were so false,
disloyal, and dishonourable, that they were no more to be trusted
than common thieves. In the very next year, Prince Henry
rebelled again, and was again forgiven. In eight years
more, Prince Richard rebelled against his elder brother; and
Prince Geoffrey infamously said that the brothers could never
agree well together, unless they were united against their
father. In the very next year after their reconciliation by
the King, Prince Henry again rebelled against his father; and
again submitted, swearing to be true; and was again forgiven; and
again rebelled with Geoffrey.</p>
<p>But the end of this perfidious Prince was come. He fell
sick at a French town; and his conscience terribly reproaching
him with his baseness, he sent messengers to the King his father,
imploring him to come and see him, and to forgive him for the
last time on his bed of death. The generous King, who had a
royal and forgiving mind towards his children always, would have
gone; but this Prince had been so unnatural, that the noblemen
about the King suspected treachery, and represented to him that
he could not safely trust his life with such a traitor, though
his own eldest son. Therefore the King sent him a ring from
off his finger as a token of forgiveness; and when the Prince had
kissed it, with much grief and many tears, and had confessed to
those around him how bad, and wicked, and undutiful a son he had
been; he said to the attendant Priests: ‘O, tie a rope
about my body, and draw me out of bed, and lay me down upon a bed
of ashes, that I may die with prayers to God in a repentant
manner!’ And so he died, at twenty-seven years
old.</p>
<p>Three years afterwards, Prince Geoffrey, being unhorsed at a
tournament, had his brains trampled out by a crowd of horses
passing over him. So, there only remained Prince Richard,
and Prince John—who had grown to be a young man now, and
had solemnly sworn to be faithful to his father. Richard
soon rebelled again, encouraged by his friend the French King,
<span class="smcap">Philip the Second</span> (son of Louis, who
was dead); and soon submitted and was again forgiven, swearing on
the New Testament never to rebel again; and in another year or
so, rebelled again; and, in the presence of his father, knelt
down on his knee before the King of France; and did the French
King homage: and declared that with his aid he would possess
himself, by force, of all his father’s French
dominions.</p>
<p>And yet this Richard called himself a soldier of Our
Saviour! And yet this Richard wore the Cross, which the
Kings of France and England had both taken, in the previous year,
at a brotherly meeting underneath the old wide-spreading elm-tree
on the plain, when they had sworn (like him) to devote themselves
to a new Crusade, for the love and honour of the Truth!</p>
<p>Sick at heart, wearied out by the falsehood of his sons, and
almost ready to lie down and die, the unhappy King who had so
long stood firm, began to fail. But the Pope, to his
honour, supported him; and obliged the French King and Richard,
though successful in fight, to treat for peace. Richard
wanted to be Crowned King of England, and pretended that he
wanted to be married (which he really did not) to the French
King’s sister, his promised wife, whom King Henry detained
in England. King Henry wanted, on the other hand, that the
French King’s sister should be married to his favourite
son, John: the only one of his sons (he said) who had never
rebelled against him. At last King Henry, deserted by his
nobles one by one, distressed, exhausted, broken-hearted,
consented to establish peace.</p>
<p>One final heavy sorrow was reserved for him, even yet.
When they brought him the proposed treaty of peace, in writing,
as he lay very ill in bed, they brought him also the list of the
deserters from their allegiance, whom he was required to
pardon. The first name upon this list was John, his
favourite son, in whom he had trusted to the last.</p>
<p>‘O John! child of my heart!’ exclaimed the King,
in a great agony of mind. ‘O John, whom I have loved
the best! O John, for whom I have contended through these
many troubles! Have you betrayed me too!’ And
then he lay down with a heavy groan, and said, ‘Now let the
world go as it will. I care for nothing more!’</p>
<p>After a time, he told his attendants to take him to the French
town of Chinon—a town he had been fond of, during many
years. But he was fond of no place now; it was too true
that he could care for nothing more upon this earth. He
wildly cursed the hour when he was born, and cursed the children
whom he left behind him; and expired.</p>
<p>As, one hundred years before, the servile followers of the
Court had abandoned the Conqueror in the hour of his death, so
they now abandoned his descendant. The very body was
stripped, in the plunder of the Royal chamber; and it was not
easy to find the means of carrying it for burial to the abbey
church of Fontevraud.</p>
<p>Richard was said in after years, by way of flattery, to have
the heart of a Lion. It would have been far better, I
think, to have had the heart of a Man. His heart, whatever
it was, had cause to beat remorsefully within his breast, when he
came—as he did—into the solemn abbey, and looked on
his dead father’s uncovered face. His heart, whatever
it was, had been a black and perjured heart, in all its dealings
with the deceased King, and more deficient in a single touch of
tenderness than any wild beast’s in the forest.</p>
<p>There is a pretty story told of this Reign, called the story
of <span class="smcap">Fair Rosamond</span>. It relates how
the King doted on Fair Rosamond, who was the loveliest girl in
all the world; and how he had a beautiful Bower built for her in
a Park at Woodstock; and how it was erected in a labyrinth, and
could only be found by a clue of silk. How the bad Queen
Eleanor, becoming jealous of Fair Rosamond, found out the secret
of the clue, and one day, appeared before her, with a dagger and
a cup of poison, and left her to the choice between those
deaths. How Fair Rosamond, after shedding many piteous
tears and offering many useless prayers to the cruel Queen, took
the poison, and fell dead in the midst of the beautiful bower,
while the unconscious birds sang gaily all around her.</p>
<p>Now, there <i>was</i> a fair Rosamond, and she was (I dare
say) the loveliest girl in all the world, and the King was
certainly very fond of her, and the bad Queen Eleanor was
certainly made jealous. But I am afraid—I say afraid,
because I like the story so much—that there was no bower,
no labyrinth, no silken clue, no dagger, no poison. I am
afraid fair Rosamond retired to a nunnery near Oxford, and died
there, peaceably; her sister-nuns hanging a silken drapery over
her tomb, and often dressing it with flowers, in remembrance of
the youth and beauty that had enchanted the King when he too was
young, and when his life lay fair before him.</p>
<p>It was dark and ended now; faded and gone. Henry
Plantagenet lay quiet in the abbey church of Fontevraud, in the
fifty-seventh year of his age—never to be
completed—after governing England well, for nearly
thirty-five years.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />