<SPAN name="2H_PART2"></SPAN>
<h2> PART II. CAUSES OF FORCE IN LANGUAGE WHICH DEPEND UPON ECONOMY OF THE MENTAL SENSIBILITIES. </h2>
<SPAN name="2H_4_0009"></SPAN>
<h2> i. The Law of Mental Exhaustion and Repair. </h2>
<p>§ 58. A few paragraphs only, can be devoted to a second division of our subject that here presents itself. To pursue in
detail the laws of effect, as applying to the larger features of composition, would carry us beyond our limits. But
we may briefly indicate a further aspect of the general principle hitherto traced out, and hint a few of its wider
applications.</p>
<p>§ 59. Thus far, then, we have considered only those causes of force in language which depend upon economy of the mental
<i>energies:</i> we have now to glance at those which depend upon economy of the mental <i>sensibilities.</i> Questionable though
this division may be as a psychological one, it will yet serve roughly to indicate the remaining field of investigation.
It will suggest that besides considering the extent to which any faculty or group of faculties is tasked in receiving
a form of words and realizing its contained idea, we have to consider the state in which this faculty or group of
faculties is left; and how the reception of subsequent sentences and images will be influenced by that state. Without
going at length into so wide a topic as the exercise of faculties and its reactive effects, it will be sufficient here
to call to mind that every faculty (when in a state of normal activity) is most capable at the outset; and that
the change in its condition, which ends in what we term exhaustion, begins simultaneously with its exercise. This
generalization, with which we are all familiar in our bodily experiences, and which our daily language recognizes as
true of the mind as a whole, is equally true of each mental power, from the simplest of the senses to the most complex
of the sentiments. If we hold a flower to the nose for long, we become insensible to its scent. We say of a very
brilliant flash of lightning that it blinds us; which means that our eyes have for a time lost their ability to
appreciate light. After eating a quantity of honey, we are apt to think our tea is without sugar. The phrase "a
deafening roar," implies that men find a very loud sound temporarily incapacitates them for hearing faint ones. To a
hand which has for some time carried a heavy body, small bodies afterwards lifted seem to have lost their weight. Now,
the truth at once recognized in these, its extreme manifestations, may be traced throughout. It may be shown that alike
in the reflective faculties, in the imagination, in the perceptions of the beautiful, the ludicrous, the sublime, in
the sentiments, the instincts, in all the mental powers, however we may classify them-action exhausts; and that in
proportion as the action is violent, the subsequent prostration is great.</p>
<p>§ 60. Equally, throughout the whole nature, may be traced the law that exercised faculties are ever tending to resume
their original state. Not only after continued rest, do they regain their full power not only do brief cessations
partially reinvigorate them; but even while they are in action, the resulting exhaustion is ever being neutralized.
The two processes of waste and repair go on together. Hence with faculties habitually exercised—as the senses of all
persons, or the muscles of any one who is strong—it happens that, during moderate activity, the repair is so nearly
equal to the waste, that the diminution of power is scarcely appreciable; and it is only when the activity has been long
continued, or has been very violent, that the repair becomes so far in arrear of the waste as to produce a perceptible
prostration. In all cases, however, when, by the action of a faculty, waste has been incurred, <i>some</i> lapse of time
must take place before full efficiency can be reacquired; and this time must be long in proportion as the waste has been
great.</p>
<SPAN name="2H_4_0010"></SPAN>
<h2> ii Explanation of Climax, Antithesis, and Anticlimax. </h2>
<p>§ 61. Keeping in mind these general truths, we shall be in a condition to understand certain causes of effect in
composition now to be considered. Every perception received, and every conception realized, entailing some amount of
waste—or, as Liebig would say, some change of matter in the brain; and the efficiency of the faculties subject to this
waste being thereby temporarily, though often but momentarily, diminished; the resulting partial inability must affect
the acts of perception and conception that immediately succeed. And hence we may expect that the vividness with which
images are realized will, in many cases, depend on the order of their presentation: even when one order is as convenient
to the understanding as the other.</p>
<p>§ 62. There are sundry facts which alike illustrate this, and are explained by it. Climax is one of them. The marked
effect obtained by placing last the most striking of any series of images, and the weakness—often the ludicrous
weakness—produced by reversing this arrangement, depends on the general law indicated. As immediately after looking
at the sun we cannot perceive the light of a fire, while by looking at the fire first and the sun afterwards we can
perceive both; so, after receiving a brilliant, or weighty, or terrible thought, we cannot appreciate a less brilliant,
less weighty, or less terrible one, while, by reversing the order, we can appreciate each. In Antithesis, again, we may
recognize the same general truth. The opposition of two thoughts that are the reverse of each other in some prominent
trait, insures an impressive effect; and does this by giving a momentary relaxation to the faculties addressed. If,
after a series of images of an ordinary character, appealing in a moderate degree to the sentiment of reverence, or
approbation, or beauty, the mind has presented to it a very insignificant, a very unworthy, or a very ugly image; the
faculty of reverence, or approbation, or beauty, as the case may be, having for the time nothing to do, tends to resume
its full power; and will immediately afterwards appreciate a vast, admirable, or beautiful image better than it would
otherwise do. Conversely, where the idea of absurdity due to extreme insignificance is to be produced, it maybe greatly
intensified by placing it after something highly impressive: especially if the form of phrase implies that something
still more impressive is coming. A good illustration of the effect gained by thus presenting a petty idea to a
consciousness that has not yet recovered from the shock of an exciting one, occurs in a sketch by Balzac. His hero
writes to a mistress who has cooled towards him the following letter:</p>
<p>"Madame, Votre conduite m'étonne autant qu'elle m'afflige Non contente de me déchirer le coeur par vos dédains vous avez
l'indélicatesse de me retenir une brosse à dents, que mes moyens ne me permettent pas de remplacer, mes propriétés etant
grevées d'hypothèques</p>
<p>"Adieu, trop, belle et trop ingrate ainie! Puissions nous nous revoir dans un monde meilleur!</p>
<p>"Charles Edouard"</p>
<p>§ 63. Thus we see that the phenomena of Climax, Antithesis, and Anticlimax, alike result from this general principle.
Improbable as these momentary variations in susceptibility may seem, we cannot doubt their occurrence when we
contemplate the analogous variations in the susceptibility of the senses. Referring once more to phenomena of vision,
every one knows that a patch of black on a white ground looks blacker, and a patch of white on a black ground looks
whiter, than elsewhere. As the blackness and the whiteness must really be the same, the only assignable cause for this
is a difference in their actions upon us, dependent upon the different states of our faculties. It is simply a visual
antithesis.</p>
<SPAN name="2H_4_0011"></SPAN>
<h2> iii. Need of Variety. </h2>
<p>§ 64. But this extension of the general principle of economy—this further condition to effective composition, that the
sensitiveness of the faculties must be continuously husbanded—includes much more than has been yet hinted. It implies
not only that certain arrangements and certain juxtapositions of connected ideas are best; but that some modes of
dividing and presenting a subject will be more striking than others; and that, too, irrespective of its logical
cohesion. It shows why we must progress from the less interesting to the more interesting; and why not only the
composition as a whole, but each of its successive portions, should tend towards a climax. At the same time, it forbids
long continuity of the same kind of thought, or repeated production of like effects. It warns us against the error
committed both by Pope in his poems and by Bacon in his essays—the error, namely, of constantly employing forcible
forms of expression: and it points out that as the easiest posture by and by becomes fatiguing, and is with pleasure
exchanged for one less easy, so, the most perfectly-constructed sentences will soon weary, and relief will be given by
using those of an inferior kind.</p>
<p>§ 65. Further, we may infer from it not only that we should avoid generally combining our words in one manner, however
good, or working out our figures and illustrations in one way, however telling; but that we should avoid anything like
uniform adherence, even to the wider conditions of effect. We should not make every section of our subject progress
in interest; we should not always rise to a climax. As we saw that, in single sentences, it is but rarely allowable to
fulfill all the conditions to strength; so, in the larger sections of a composition we must not often conform entirely
to the law indicated. We must subordinate the component effect to the total effect.</p>
<p>§ 66. In deciding how practically to carry out the principles of artistic composition, we may derive help by bearing in
mind a fact already pointed out—the fitness of certain verbal arrangements for certain kinds of thought. That
constant variety in the mode of presenting ideas which the theory demands, will in a great degree result from a skilful
adaptation of the form to the matter. We saw how the direct or inverted sentence is spontaneously used by excited
people; and how their language is also characterized by figures of speech and by extreme brevity. Hence these may with
advantage predominate in emotional passages; and may increase as the emotion rises. On the other hand, for complex
ideas, the indirect sentence seems the best vehicle. In conversation, the excitement produced by the near approach to
a desired conclusion, will often show itself in a series of short, sharp sentences; while, in impressing a view already
enunciated, we generally make our periods voluminous by piling thought upon thought. These natural modes of
procedure may serve as guides in writing. Keen observation and skilful analysis would, in like manner, detect further
peculiarities of expression produced by other attitudes of mind; and by paying due attention to all such traits, a
writer possessed of sufficient versatility might make some approach to a completely-organized work.</p>
<SPAN name="2H_4_0012"></SPAN>
<h2> iv. The Ideal Writer. </h2>
<p>§ 67. This species of composition which the law of effect points out as the perfect one, is the one which high genius
tends naturally to produce. As we found that the kinds of sentences which are theoretically best, are those generally
employed by superior minds, and by inferior minds when excitement has raised them; so, we shall find that the ideal
form for a poem, essay, or fiction, is that which the ideal writer would evolve spontaneously. One in whom the powers of
expression fully responded to the state of feeling, would unconsciously use that variety in the mode of presenting
his thoughts, which Art demands. This constant employment of one species of phraseology, which all have now to strive
against, implies an undeveloped faculty of language. To have a specific style is to be poor in speech. If we remember
that, in the far past, men had only nouns and verbs to convey their ideas with, and that from then to now the growth
has been towards a greater number of implements of thought, and consequently towards a greater complexity and variety in
their combinations; we may infer that we are now, in our use of sentences, much what the primitive man was in his use
of words; and that a continuance of the process that has hitherto gone on, must produce increasing heterogeneity in our
modes of expression. As now, in a fine nature, the play of the features, the tones of the voice and its cadences, vary
in harmony with every thought uttered; so, in one possessed of a fully developed power of speech, the mould in which
each combination of words is cast will similarly vary with, and be appropriate to the sentiment.</p>
<p>§ 68. That a perfectly endowed man must unconsciously write in all styles, we may infer from considering how styles
originate. Why is Johnson pompous, Goldsmith simple? Why is one author abrupt, another rhythmical, another concise?
Evidently in each case the habitual mode of utterance must depend upon the habitual balance of the nature. The
predominant feelings have by use trained the intellect to represent them. But while long, though unconscious, discipline
has made it do this efficiently, it remains from lack of practice, incapable of doing the same for the less active
feelings; and when these are excited, the usual verbal forms undergo but slight modifications. Let the powers of speech
be fully developed, however—let the ability of the intellect to utter the emotions be complete; and this fixity of
style will disappear. The perfect writer will express himself as Junius, when in the Junius frame of mind; when he feels
as Lamb felt, will use a like familiar speech; and will fall into the ruggedness of Carlyle when in a Carlylean mood.
Now he will be rhythmical and now irregular; here his language will be plain and there ornate; sometimes his sentences
will be balanced and at other times unsymmetrical; for a while there will be considerable sameness, and then again great
variety. His mode of expression naturally responding to his state of feeling, there will flow from his pen a composition
changing to the same degree that the aspects of his subject change. He will thus without effort conform to what we have
seen to be the laws of effect. And while his work presents to the reader that variety needful to prevent continuous
exertion of the same faculties, it will also answer to the description of all highly organized products, both of man and
of nature: it will be not a series of like parts simply placed in juxtaposition, but one whole made up of unlike parts
that are mutually dependent.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />
1 of 2
2 of 2
Previous
Next
Update Required
To play the media you will need to either update your browser to a recent version or update your Flash plugin.