<p><SPAN name="c2-3" id="c2-3"></SPAN> </p>
<p> </p>
<h3>CHAPTER III.</h3>
<h4>RETROSPECTIVE.—SECOND YEAR.<br/> </h4>
<p>The next year passed almost more uncomfortably for George Bertram and
for the ladies at Littlebath than had the latter months of the last
year. Its occurrences can, I hope, be stated less in detail, so that
we may get on without too great delay to the incidents of the period
which is to be awhile for us the present existing time.</p>
<p>This year was Harcourt's great year. In January and February and
March he did great things in Chancery. In April he came into
Parliament. In May and June and July, he sat on committees. In August
he stuck to his work till London was no longer endurable. In the
latter part of autumn there was an extraordinary session, during
which he worked like a horse. He studied the corn-law question as
well as sundry legal reforms all the Christmas week, and in the
following spring he came out with his great speech on behalf of Sir
Robert Peel. But, nevertheless, he found time to devote to the cares
and troubles of Miss Baker and Miss Waddington.</p>
<p>In the spring Bertram paid one or two visits to Littlebath; but it
may be doubted whether he made himself altogether agreeable there. He
stated broadly that he was doing little or nothing at his profession:
he was, he said, engaged on other matters; the great excitement to
work, under which he had commenced, had been withdrawn from him; and
under these circumstances he was not inclined to devote himself
exclusively to studies which certainly were not to his taste. He did
not condescend again to ask Caroline to revoke her sentence; he
pressed now for no marriage; but he made it quite apparent that all
the changes in himself for the worse—and there had been changes for
the worse—were owing to her obstinacy.</p>
<p>He was now living a life of dissipation. I do not intend that it
should be understood that he utterly gave himself up to pleasures
disgraceful in themselves, that he altogether abandoned the reins,
and allowed himself to live such a life as is passed by some young
men in London. His tastes and appetites were too high for this. He
did not sink into a slough of despond. He did not become filthy and
vicious, callous and bestial; but he departed very widely astray from
those rules which governed him during his first six months in London.</p>
<p>All this was well known at Littlebath; nor did Bertram at all
endeavour to conceal the truth. Indeed, it may be said of him, that
he never concealed anything. In this especial case he took a pride in
letting Caroline know the full extent of the evil she had done.</p>
<p>It was a question with them whether he had not now given up the bar
as a profession altogether. He did not say that he had done so, and
it was certainly his intention to keep his terms, and to be called;
but he had now no longer a legal Gamaliel. Some time in the April of
this year, Mr. Die had written to him a very kind little note,
begging him to call one special morning at the chambers in Stone
Buildings, if not very inconvenient to him. Bertram did call, and Mr.
Die, with many professions of regard and regret, honestly returned to
him his money paid for that year's tutelage. "It had been," he said,
"a pleasure and a pride to him to have Mr. Bertram in his chambers;
and would still be so to have him there again. But he could not take
a gentleman's money under a false pretence; as it seemed to be no
longer Mr. Bertram's intention to attend there, he must beg to refund
it." And he did refund it accordingly. This also was made known to
the ladies at Littlebath.</p>
<p>He was engaged, he had said, on other matters. This also was true.
During the first six months of his anger, he had been content to be
idle; but idleness did not suit him, so he sat himself down and wrote
a book. He published this book without his name, but he told them at
Littlebath of his authorship; and some one also told of it at Oxford.
The book—or bookling, for it consisted but of one small demy-octavo
volume—was not such as delighted his friends either at Littlebath or
at Oxford, or even at those two Hampshire parsonages. At Littlebath
it made Miss Baker's hair stand on end, and at Oxford it gave rise to
a suggestion in some orthodox quarters that Mr. Bertram should be
requested to resign his fellowship.</p>
<p>It has been told how, sitting on the Mount of Olives, he had been
ready to devote himself to the service of the church to which he
belonged. Could his mind have been known at that time, how proud
might one have been of him! His mind was not then known; but now,
after a lapse of two years, he made it as it were public, and Oriel
was by no means proud of him.</p>
<p>The name of his little book was a very awful name. It was called the
"Romance of Scripture." He began in his first chapter with an earnest
remonstrance against that condemnation which he knew the injustice of
the world would pronounce against him. There was nothing in his book,
he said, to warrant any man in accusing him of unbelief. Let those
who were so inclined to accuse him read and judge. He had called
things by their true names, and that doubtless by some would be
imputed to him as a sin. But it would be found that he had gone no
further in impugning the truth of Scripture than many other writers
before him, some of whom had since been rewarded for their writings
by high promotion in the church. The bishops' bench was the reward
for orthodoxy; but there had been a taste for liberal deans. He had
gone no further, he said, than many deans.</p>
<p>It was acknowledged, he went on to say, that all Scripture statements
could not now be taken as true to the letter; particularly not as
true to the letter as now adopted by Englishmen. It seemed to him
that the generality of his countrymen were of opinion that the
inspired writers had themselves written in English. It was forgotten
that they were Orientals, who wrote in the language natural to them,
with the customary grandiloquence of orientalism, with the poetic
exaggeration which, in the East, was the breath of life. It was
forgotten also that they wrote in ignorance of those natural truths
which men had now acquired by experience and induction, and not by
revelation. Their truth was the truth of heaven, not the truth of
earth. No man thought that the sun in those days did rise and set,
moving round the earth, because a prolongation of the day had been
described by the sun standing still upon Gibeon. And then he took the
book of Job, and measured that by the light of his own candle—and so
on.</p>
<p>The book was undoubtedly clever, and men read it. Women also read it,
and began to talk, some of them at least, of the blindness of their
mothers who had not had wit to see that these old chronicles were
very much as other old chronicles. "The Romance of Scripture" was to
be seen frequently in booksellers' advertisements, and Mr. Mudie told
how he always had two thousand copies of it on his shelves. So our
friend did something in the world; but what he did do was
unfortunately not applauded by his friends.</p>
<p>Harcourt very plainly told him that a man who scribbled never did any
good at the bar. The two trades, he said, were not compatible.</p>
<p>"No," said George, "I believe not. An author must be nothing if he do
not love truth; a barrister must be nothing if he do." Harcourt was
no whit annoyed by the repartee, but having given his warning, went
his way to his work.</p>
<p>It was very well known that the "Romance of Scripture" was Bertram's
work, and there was a comfortable row about it at Oxford. The row was
all private, of course—as was necessary, the book having been
published without the author's name. But much was said, and many
letters were written. Bertram, in writing to the friend at Oriel who
took up the cudgels in his defence, made three statements. First,
that no one at Oxford had a right to suppose that he was the author.
Second, that he was the author, and that no one at Oxford had a right
to find fault with what he had written. Thirdly, that it was quite a
matter of indifference to him who did find fault. To this, however,
he added, that he was ready to resign his fellowship to-morrow if the
Common-room at Oriel wished to get rid of him.</p>
<p>So the matter rested—for awhile. Those who at this time knew Bertram
best were confident enough that his belief was shaken, in spite of
the remonstrance so loudly put forth in his first pages. He had
intended to be honest in his remonstrance; but it is not every man
who exactly knows what he does believe. Every man! Is there, one may
almost ask, any man who has such knowledge? We all believe in the
resurrection of the body; we say so at least, but what do we believe
by it?</p>
<p>Men may be firm believers and yet doubt some Bible statements—doubt
the letter of such statements. But men who are firm believers will
not be those to put forth their doubts with all their eloquence. Such
men, if they devote their time to Scripture history, will not be
arrested by the sun's standing on Gibeon. If they speak out at all,
they will speak out rather as to all they do believe than as to the
little that they doubt. It was soon known to Bertram's world that
those who regarded him as a freethinker did him no great injustice.</p>
<p>This and other things made them very unhappy at Littlebath. The very
fact of George having written such a book nearly scared Miss Baker
out of her wits. She, according to her own lights, would have placed
freethinkers in the same category with murderers, regicides, and
horrid mysterious sinners who commit crimes too dreadful for women to
think of. She would not believe that Bertram was one of these; but it
was fearful to think that any one should so call him. Caroline,
perhaps, would not so much have minded this flaw in her future
husband's faith if it had not been proof of his unsteadiness, of his
unfitness for the world's battle. She remembered what he had said to
her two years since on the Mount of Olives; and then thought of what
he was saying now. Everything with him was impulse and enthusiasm.
All judgment was wanting. How should such as he get on in the world?
And had she indissolubly linked her lot to that of one who was so
incapable of success? No; indissolubly she had not so linked it; not
as yet.</p>
<p>One night she opened her mind to her aunt, and spoke very seriously
of her position. "I hardly know what I ought to do," she said. "I
know how much I owe him; I know how much he has a right to expect
from me. And I would pay him all I owe; I would do my duty by him
even at the sacrifice of myself if I could plainly see what my duty
is."</p>
<p>"But, Caroline, do you wish to give him up?"</p>
<p>"No, not if I could keep him; keep him as he was. My high hopes are
done with; my ambition is over; I no longer look for much. But I
would fain know that he still loves me before I marry him. I would
wish to be sure that he means to live with me. In his present mood,
how can I know aught of him? how be sure of anything?"</p>
<p>Her aunt, after remaining for some half-hour in consideration, at
last and with reluctance gave her advice.</p>
<p>"It all but breaks my heart to say so; but, Caroline, I think I would
abandon it: I think I would ask him to release me from my promise."</p>
<p>It may well be imagined that Miss Waddington was not herself when she
declared that her high hopes were done with, that her ambition was
over. She was not herself. Anxiety, sorrow, and doubt—doubt as to
the man whom she had pledged herself to love, whom she did love—had
made her ill, and she was not herself. She had become thin and pale,
and was looking old and wan. She sat silent for awhile, leaning with
her head on her hand, and made no answer to her aunt's suggestion.</p>
<p>"I really would, Caroline; indeed, I would. I know you are not happy
as you are."</p>
<p>"Happy!"</p>
<p>"You are looking wretchedly ill, too. I know all this is wearing you.
Take my advice, Caroline, and write to him."</p>
<p>"There are two reasons against it, aunt; two strong reasons."</p>
<p>"What reasons, love?"</p>
<p>"In the first place, I love him." Aunt Mary sighed. She had no other
answer but a sigh to give to this. "And in the next place, I have no
right to ask anything of him."</p>
<p>"Why not, Caroline?"</p>
<p>"He made his request to me, and I refused it. Had I consented to
marry him last year, all this would have been different. I intended
to do right, and even now I do not think that I was wrong. But I
cannot impute fault to him. He does all this in order that I may
impute it, and that then he may have his revenge."</p>
<p>Nothing more was said on the matter at that time, and things went on
for awhile again in the same unsatisfactory state.</p>
<p>Early in the summer, Miss Waddington and her aunt went up for a few
weeks to London. It had been Miss Baker's habit to spend some days at
Hadley about this time of the year. She suggested to Caroline, that
instead of her doing so, they should both go for a week or so to
London. She thought that the change would be good for her niece, and
she thought also, though of this she said nothing, that Caroline
would see something of her lover. If he were not to be given up, it
would be well—so Miss Baker thought—that this marriage should be
delayed no longer. Bertram was determined to prove that marriage was
necessary to tame him; he had proved it—at any rate to Miss Baker's
satisfaction. There would now be money enough to live on, as uncle
Bertram's two thousand pounds had been promised for this summer. On
this little scheme Miss Baker went to work.</p>
<p>Caroline made no opposition to the London plan. She said nothing
about George in connection with it; but her heart was somewhat
softened, and she wished to see him.</p>
<p>Miss Baker therefore wrote up for rooms. She would naturally, one
would say, have written to George, but there were now little
jealousies and commencements of hot blood even between them. George,
though still Caroline's engaged lover, was known to have some bitter
feelings, and was believed perhaps by Miss Baker to be more bitter
than he really was. So the lodgings were taken without any reference
to him. When they reached town they found that he was abroad.</p>
<p>Then Miss Waddington was really angry. They had no right, it is true,
to be annoyed in that he was not there to meet them. They had not
given him the opportunity. But it did appear to them that,
circumstanced as they were, considering the acknowledged engagement
between them, he was wrong to leave the country without letting them
have a word to say whither he was going or for how long. It was
nearly a fortnight since he had written to Caroline, and, for
anything they knew, it might be months before she again heard from
him.</p>
<p>It was then that they sent for Harcourt, and at this period that they
became so intimate with him. Bertram had told him of this foreign
trip, but only a day or two before he had taken his departure. It was
just at this time that there had been the noise about the "Romance of
Scripture." Bertram had defended himself in one or two newspapers,
had written his defiant letter to his friend at Oxford, and then
started to meet his father at Paris. He was going no further, and
might be back in a week. This however must be uncertain, as his
return would depend on that of Sir Lionel. Sir Lionel intended to
come to London with him.</p>
<p>Mr. Harcourt was very attentive to them—in spite of his being at
that time so useful a public man. He was very attentive to both,
being almost as civil to the elder lady as he was to the younger,
which, for an Englishman, showed very good breeding. By degrees they
both began to regard him with confidence—with sufficient confidence
to talk to him of Bertram; with sufficient confidence even to tell him
of all their fears. By degrees Caroline would talk to him alone, and when
once she permitted herself to do so, she concealed nothing.</p>
<p>Harcourt said not a word against his friend. That friend himself
might perhaps have thought that his friend, speaking of him behind
his back, might have spoken more warmly in his praise. But it was
hard at present to say much that should be true in Bertram's praise.
He was not living in a wise or prudent manner; not preparing himself
in any way to live as a man should live by the sweat of his brow.
Harcourt could not say much in his favour. That Bertram was clever,
honest, true, and high-spirited, that Miss Waddington knew; that Miss
Baker knew: what they wanted to learn was, that he was making prudent
use of these high qualities. Harcourt could not say that he was doing
so.</p>
<p>"That he will fall on his legs at last," said Harcourt once when he
was alone with Caroline, "I do not doubt; with his talent, and his
high, honest love of virtue, it is all but impossible that he should
throw himself away. But the present moment is of such vital
importance! It is so hard to make up for the loss even of twelve
months!"</p>
<p>"I am sure it is," said Caroline; "but I would not care for that so
much if I <span class="nowrap">thought—"</span></p>
<p>"Thought what, Miss Waddington?"</p>
<p>"That his disposition was not altered. He was so frank, so candid,
so—so—so affectionate."</p>
<p>"It is the manner of men to change in that respect. They become,
perhaps, not less affectionate, but less demonstrative."</p>
<p>To this Miss Waddington answered nothing. It might probably be so. It
was singular enough that she, with her ideas, should be complaining
to a perfect stranger of an uncaressing, unloving manner in her
lover; she who had professed to herself that she lived so little for
love! Had George been even kneeling at her knee, her heart would have
been stern enough. It was only by feeling a woman's wrong that she
found herself endowed with a woman's privilege.</p>
<p>"I do not think that Bertram's heart is changed," continued Harcourt;
"he is doubtless very angry that his requests to you last summer were
not complied with."</p>
<p>"But how could we have married then, Mr. Harcourt? Think what our
income would have been; and he as yet without any profession!"</p>
<p>"I am not blaming you. I am not taking his part against you. I only
say that he is very angry."</p>
<p>"But does he bear malice, Mr. Harcourt?"</p>
<p>"No, he does not bear malice; men may be angry without bearing
malice. He thinks that you have shown a want of confidence in him,
and are still showing it."</p>
<p>"And has he not justified that want of confidence?"</p>
<p>To this Harcourt answered nothing, but he smiled slightly.</p>
<p>"Well, has he not? What could I have done? What ought I to have done?
Tell me, Mr. Harcourt. It distresses me beyond measure that you
should think I have been to blame."</p>
<p>"I do not think so; far from it, Miss Waddington. Bertram is my dear
friend, and I know his fine qualities; but I cannot but own that he
justified you in that temporary want of confidence which you now
express."</p>
<p>Mr. Harcourt, though a member of Parliament and a learned pundit, was
nevertheless a very young man. He was an unmarried man also, and a
man not yet engaged to be married. It may be surmised that George
Bertram would not have been pleased had he known the sort of
conversations that were held between his dear friend and his
betrothed bride. And yet Caroline at this period loved him better
than ever she had done.</p>
<p>A week or ten days after this three letters arrived from Bertram, one
for Caroline, one for Miss Baker, and one for Harcourt. Caroline and
her aunt had lingered in London, both doubtless in the hope that
Bertram would return. There can be little doubt now that had he
returned, and had he been anxious for the marriage, Miss Waddington
would have consented. She was becoming ill at ease, dissatisfied,
what the world calls heart-broken. Now that she was tried, she found
herself not to be so strong in her own resolves. She was not sick
from love alone; her position was altogether wretched—though she was
engaged, and persisted in adhering to her engagement, she felt and
often expressed to her aunt a presentiment that she and Bertram would
never be married.</p>
<p>They waited for awhile in the hope that he might return; but instead
of himself, there came three letters. Harcourt, it seemed, had
written to him, and hence arose these epistles. That to Miss Baker
was very civil and friendly. Had that come alone it would have
created no complaint. He explained to her that had he expected her
visit to London, he would have endeavoured to meet her; that he could
not now return, as he had promised to remain awhile with his father.
Sir Lionel had been unwell, and the waters of Vichy had been
recommended. He was going to Vichy with Sir Lionel, and would not be
in London till August. His plans after that were altogether
unsettled, but he would not be long in London before he came to
Littlebath. Such was his letter to Miss Baker.</p>
<p>To Harcourt he wrote very shortly. He was obliged to him for the
interest he took in the welfare of Miss Waddington, and for his
attention to Miss Baker. That was nearly all he said. There was not
an angry word in the letter; but, nevertheless, his friend was able
to deduce from it, short as it was, that Bertram was angry.</p>
<p>But on the head of his betrothed he poured out the vial of his wrath.
He had never before scolded her, had never written in an angry tone.
Now in very truth he did so. An angry letter, especially if the
writer be well loved, is so much fiercer than any angry speech, so
much more unendurable! There the words remain, scorching, not to be
explained away, not to be atoned for by a kiss, not to be softened
down by the word of love that may follow so quickly upon spoken
anger. Heaven defend me from angry letters! They should never be
written, unless to schoolboys and men at college; and not often to
them if they be any way tender hearted. This at least should be a
rule through the letter-writing world: that no angry letter be posted
till four-and-twenty hours shall have elapsed since it was written.
We all know how absurd is that other rule, that of saying the
alphabet when you are angry. Trash! Sit down and write your letter;
write it with all the venom in your power; spit out your spleen at
the fullest; 'twill do you good; you think you have been injured; say
all that you can say with all your poisoned eloquence, and gratify
yourself by reading it while your temper is still hot. Then put it in
your desk; and, as a matter of course, burn it before breakfast the
following morning. Believe me that you will then have a double
gratification.</p>
<p>A pleasant letter I hold to be the pleasantest thing that this world
has to give. It should be good-humoured; witty it may be, but with a
gentle diluted wit. Concocted brilliancy will spoil it altogether.
Not long, so that it be tedious in the reading; nor brief, so that
the delight suffice not to make itself felt. It should be written
specially for the reader, and should apply altogether to him, and not
altogether to any other. It should never flatter. Flattery is always
odious. But underneath the visible stream of pungent water there may
be the slightest under-current of eulogy, so that it be not seen, but
only understood. Censure it may contain freely, but censure which in
arraigning the conduct implies no doubt as to the intellect. It
should be legibly written, so that it may be read with comfort; but
no more than that. Caligraphy betokens caution, and if it be not
light in hand it is nothing. That it be fairly grammatical and not
ill spelt the writer owes to his schoolmaster; but this should come
of habit, not of care. Then let its page be soiled by no business;
one touch of utility will destroy it all.</p>
<p>If you ask for examples, let it be as unlike Walpole as may be. If
you can so write it that Lord Byron might have written it, you will
not be very far from high excellence.</p>
<p>But, above all things, see that it be good-humoured.</p>
<p>Bertram's letter to the lady that he loved was by no means one of
this sort. In the first place, it was not good-humoured; it was very
far from being so. Had it been so, it would utterly have belied his
feelings. Harcourt had so written to him as to make him quite clearly
understand that all his sins and—which was much more to him—all his
loves had been fully discussed between his friend and Miss
Waddington—between his Caroline and another man. To the pride of his
heart nothing could be more revolting. It was as though his dearest
possession had been ransacked in his absence, and rifled and
squandered by the very guardian to whom he had left the key. There
had been sore misgivings, sore differences between him and Caroline;
but, nevertheless, she had had all his heart. Now, in his absence,
she had selected his worldly friend Harcourt, and discussed that
possession and its flaws with him! There was that in all this of
which he could not write with good-humour. Nevertheless, had he kept
his letter to the second morning, it may probably be said that he
would have hesitated to send it.</p>
<p>"My dearest Caroline," it began. Now I put it to all lovers whether,
when they wish to please, they ever write in such manner to their
sweethearts. Is it not always, "My own love?" "Dearest love?" "My own
sweet pet?" But that use of the Christian name, which is so delicious
in the speaking during the first days of intimacy, does it not always
betoken something stern at the beginning of a lover's letter? Ah, it
may betoken something very stern! "My dearest Jane, I am sorry to say
it, but I could not approve of the way in which you danced with Major
Simkins last night." "My dearest Lucy, I was at Kensington-garden
gate yesterday at four, and remained absolutely till five. You really
ought—." Is not that always the angry lover's tone?</p>
<p>I fear that I must give Bertram's letter entire to make the matter
sufficiently clear.<br/> </p>
<blockquote>
<p>My dearest Caroline,</p>
<p>I learn from Mr. Harcourt that you and Miss Baker are in
town, and I am of course sorry to miss you. Would it not
have been better that I should have heard this from
yourself?</p>
<p>Mr. Harcourt tells me that you are dissatisfied; and I
understand from his letter that you have explained your
dissatisfaction very fully to him. It might have been
better, I think, that the explanation should have been
made to me; or had you chosen to complain, you might have
done so to your aunt, or to your grandfather. I cannot
think that you were at liberty to complain of me to Mr.
Harcourt. My wish is, that you have no further
conversation with him on our joint concerns. It is not
seemly; and, if feminine, is at any rate not ladylike.</p>
<p>I am driven to defend myself. What is it of which you
complain, or have a right to complain? We became engaged
more than twelve months since, certainly with no
understanding that the matter was to stand over for three
years. My understanding was that we were to be married as
soon as it might reasonably be arranged. You then took on
yourself to order this delay, and kindly offered to give
me up as an alternative. I could not force you to marry
me; but I loved you too well, and trusted too much in your
love to be able to think that that giving up was
necessary. Perhaps I was wrong.</p>
<p>But the period of this wretched interval is at my own
disposal. Had you married me, my time would have been
yours. It would have been just that you should know how it
was spent. Each would then have known so much of the
other. But you have chosen that this should not be; and,
therefore, I deny your right now to make inquiry. If I
have departed from any hopes you had formed, you have no
one to blame but yourself.</p>
<p>You have said that I neglect you. I am ready to marry you
to-morrow; I have been ready to do so any day since our
engagement. You yourself know how much more than ready I
have been. I do not profess to be a very painstaking
lover; nay, if you will, the life would bore me, even if
in our case the mawkishness of the delay did not do more
than bore. At any rate, I will not go through it. I loved,
and do love you truly. I told you of it truly when I first
knew it myself, and urged my suit till I had a definite
answer. You accepted me, and now there needs be nothing
further till we are married.</p>
<p>But I insist on this, that I will not have my affairs
discussed by you with persons to whom you are a stranger.</p>
<p>You will see my letter to your aunt. I have told her that
I will visit her at Littlebath as soon as I have returned
to England.</p>
<p class="ind8">Yours ever affectionately,</p>
<p class="ind15">G. B.<br/> </p>
</blockquote>
<p>This letter was a terrible blow to Caroline. It seemed to her to be
almost incredible that she, she, Caroline Waddington, should be
forced to receive such a letter as that under any circumstances and
from any gentleman. Unseemly, unfeminine, unladylike! These were the
epithets her lover used in addressing her. She was told that it bored
him to play the lover; that his misconduct was her fault; and then
she was accused of mawkishness! He was imperative, too, in laying his
orders to her. "I insist on this!" Was it incumbent on her to comply
with his insistings?</p>
<p>Of course she showed the letter to her aunt, whose advice resulted in
this—that it would be better that she should pocket the affront
silently if she were not prepared to give up the engagement
altogether. If she were so prepared, the letter doubtless would give
her the opportunity.</p>
<p>And then Mr. Harcourt came to her while her anger was yet at the
hottest. His manner was so kind, his temper so sweet, his attention
so obliging, that she could not but be glad to see him. If George
loved her, if he wished to guide her, wished to persuade her, why was
not he at her right hand? Mr. Harcourt was there instead. It did not
bore him, multifold as his duties were, to be near her.</p>
<p>Then she committed the first great fault of which in this history she
will be shown as being guilty. She showed her lover's letter to Mr.
Harcourt. Of course this was not done without some previous converse;
till he had found out that she was wretched, and inquired as to her
wretchedness; till she had owned that she was ill with sorrow, beside
herself, and perplexed in the extreme. Then at last, saying to
herself that she cared not now to obey Mr. Bertram, she showed the
letter to Mr. Harcourt.</p>
<p>"It is ungenerous," said Harcourt.</p>
<p>"It is ungentlemanlike," said Caroline. "But it was written in
passion, and I shall not notice it." And so she and Miss Baker went
back again to Littlebath.</p>
<p>It was September before Bertram returned, and then Sir Lionel came
with him. We have not space to tell much of what had passed between
the father and the son; but they reached London apparently on good
terms with each other, and Sir Lionel settled himself in a bedroom
near to his son's chambers, and near also to his own club. There was,
however, this great ground of disagreement between them. Sir Lionel
was very anxious that his son should borrow money from Mr. Bertram,
and George very resolutely declined to do so. It was now clear enough
to Sir Lionel that his son could not show his filial disposition by
advancing on his own behalf much money to his father, as he was
himself by no means in affluent circumstances.</p>
<p>He went down to Littlebath, and took his father with him. The meeting
between the lovers was again unloverlike; but nothing could be more
affectionate than Sir Lionel. He took Caroline in his arms and kissed
her, called her his dear daughter, and praised her beauty. I believe
he kissed Miss Baker. Indeed, I know that he made an attempt to do
so; and I think it not at all improbable that in the overflowing of
his affectionate heart, he made some overture of the same kind to the
exceedingly pretty parlour-maid who waited upon them. Whatever might
be thought of George, Sir Lionel soon became popular there, and his
popularity was not decreased when he declared that he would spend the
remainder of the autumn, and perhaps the winter, at Littlebath.</p>
<p>He did stay there for the winter. He had a year's furlough, during
which he was to remain in England with full pay, and he made it known
to the ladies at Littlebath that the chief object of his getting this
leave was to be present at the nuptials of dear Caroline and his son.
On one occasion he borrowed thirty pounds from Miss Baker; a
circumstance which their intimacy, perhaps, made excusable. He
happened, however, to mention this little occurrence casually to his
son, and George at once repaid that debt, poor as he was at the time.</p>
<p>"You could have that and whatever more you chose merely for the
asking," said Sir Lionel on that occasion, in a tone almost of
reproach.</p>
<p>And so the winter passed away. George, however, was not idle. He
fully intended to be called to the bar in the following autumn, and
did, to a certain extent, renew his legal studies. He did not return
to Mr. Die, prevented possibly by the difficulty he would have in
preparing the necessary funds. But his great work through the winter
and in the early spring was another small volume, which he published
in March, and which he called, "The Fallacies of Early History."</p>
<p>We need not give any minute criticism on this work. It will suffice
to say that the orthodox world declared it to be much more heterodox
than the last work. Heterodox, indeed! It was so bad, they said, that
there was not the least glimmer of any doxy whatever left about it.
The early history of which he spoke was altogether Bible history, and
the fallacies to which he alluded were the plainest statements of the
book of Genesis. Nay, he had called the whole story of Creation a
myth; the whole story as there given: so at least said the rabbis of
Oxford, and among them outspoke more loudly than any others the
outraged and very learned rabbis of Oriel.</p>
<p>Bertram however denied this. He had, he said, not called anything a
myth. There was the printed book, and one might have supposed that it
would be easy enough to settle this question. But it was far from
being so. The words myth and mythical were used half a dozen times,
and the rabbis declared that they were applied to the statements of
Scripture. Bertram declared that they were applied to the appearance
those statements must have as at present put before the English
world. Then he said something not complimentary to the translators,
and something also very uncivil as to want of intelligence on the
part of the Oxford rabbis. The war raged warmly, and was taken up by
the metropolitan press, till Bertram became a lion—a lion, however,
without a hide, for in the middle of the dispute he felt himself
called on to resign his fellowship.</p>
<p>He lost that hide; but he got another in lieu which his friends
assured him was of a much warmer texture. His uncle had taken
considerable interest in this dispute, alleging all through that the
Oxford men were long-eared asses and bigoted monks. It may be
presumed that his own orthodoxy was not of a high class. He had never
liked George's fellowship, and had always ridiculed the income which
he received from it. Directly he heard that it had been resigned, he
gave his nephew a thousand pounds. He said nothing about it; he
merely told Mr. Pritchett to arrange the matter.</p>
<p>Sir Lionel was delighted. As to the question of orthodoxy he was
perfectly indifferent. It was nothing to him whether his son called
the book of Genesis a myth or a gospel; but he had said much, very
much as to the folly of risking the fellowship; and more, a great
deal more, as to the madness of throwing it away. But now he was
quite ready to own himself wrong, and did do so in the most
straightforward manner. After all, what was a fellowship to a man
just about to be married? In his position Bertram had of course been
free to speak out. If, indeed, there had been any object in holding
to the college, then the expression of such opinions, let alone their
publication, would not have been judicious.</p>
<p>As it was, however, nothing could have been more lucky. His son had
shown his independence. The rich uncle had shown the warm interest
which he still took in his nephew, and Sir Lionel was able to borrow
two hundred and fifty pounds, a sum of money which, at the present
moment, was very grateful to him. Bertram's triumph was gilded on all
sides; for the booksellers had paid him handsomely for his infidel
manuscript. Infidelity that can make itself successful will, at any
rate, bring an income.</p>
<p>And this brings us to the period at which we may resume our story.
One word we must say as to Caroline. During the winter she had seen
her lover repeatedly, and had written to him repeatedly. Their
engagement, therefore, had by no means been broken. But their
meetings were cold, and their letters equally so. She would have
married him at once now if he would ask her. But he would not ask
her. He was quite willing to marry her if she would herself say that
she was willing so far to recede from her former resolution. But she
could not bring herself to do this. Each was too proud to make the
first concession to the other, and therefore no concession was made
by either.</p>
<p>Sir Lionel once attempted to interfere; but he failed. George gave
him to understand that he could manage his own affairs himself. When
a son is frequently called on to lend money to his father, and that
father is never called on to repay it, the parental authority is apt
to grow dull. It had become very dull in this case.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />